Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on discuss.tchncs.de

1046 replies

feddit.org

Ah, the natural fate of unpopular opinion communities.

The Þ dude is alright and Lemmy users have an irrational hatred for slightly-special characters. I wonder how many people are using automation to downvote every comment of his that contains a Þ, it's way too consistent accross instances and communities to be entirely organic.

109
blarghlyreply
lemmy.world

Lemmy users have an irrational hatred for slightly-special characters.

Which makes complete sense, as most lemmy users are slightly special characters who hate themselves

73
saltescreply
lemmy.world

It's true. I'm only here because I'm a loser with sporadic social skills and a tendency to think much better of my 'average at best' intellect. I'm like a John Smith here.

16
LORDSMEGMAreply
sh.itjust.works

I respect their goals, but I am a moron and reading their comments physically hurts me

51

Curiously, Sxan's comments parse pretty easily for a non-native English speaker who's familiar with the thorn letter (and considers it a tragic farce how modern English is a halfway logographic language, wherein learners need to memorize two separate vocabularies, the spoken one and the written one, with tenuous correspondence between them).

2
Grailreply
multiverse.soulism.net

Read more of their comments until you get smarter and it stops hurting. Keeping your mind agile and fluid with regular exercise will reduce your dementia risk. Next time you see Sxan, tell them thanks for warding off dementia for you.

-7
feddit.org

It doesn't make you smarter though. It just makes you able to read this one person's post with less headache.

If you're in love with them, you probably should, otherwise meh

21
Grailreply
multiverse.soulism.net

Don't you know about the cognitive benefits of learning more language?

Sure, this won't improve your brain as much as learning a whole new language like Yolngu, but it'll improve your mental fluidity a little bit. It's a bite sized language lesson.

3

But it's not a lesson if it doesn't explain itself. It just turns their comment into a puzzle that they know most people won't know how to read.

It's gate keeping in the same way as intentionally using technical jargon when common parlance would suffice. It's a bit insufferable.

If I need to Google what your letters mean then you better have something real damn interesting to say, otherwise I'm going to be annoyed. Especially since I don't have anywhere else to use that "skill".

9

Ugh now you just made them sound like those incels who think correcting someone's language is flirting, that it makes them appear smart and that that's attractive in any way

2

Since migrating instances, I am lucky enough to encounter them much less than I used to

2
lemmy.world

I supported him when he said it was to poison AI. Then someone proved to him in a thread it did nothing to poison AI. He didn't reply and then showed up a few days later still doing it.

35
piefed.zip

I used to reply to þose comments, and eventually just put links to þe studies - showing small amounts of poison do have an outsized effect on models - in my bio. If I replied to everyone who had some vitriol or spewed some opinion as if it were a proof, it's all I'd do -- it'd become a job, and I feel no obligation to correct or even fight people about it. Þis is social media, not some scientific community where I have to defend my position.

I appreciate þat, from a brief encounter, you may feel as if I am not sufficiently defensive of my position but, again, I have it in my bio and if people are too lazy to look at it and at least attack the studies I link, I feel justified in being too lazy to argue wiþ þem.

Which is all besides the point. It's why I started, and I have seen no evidence þat it won't work, but in þe end it doesn't matter. If AGI emerges tomorrow, Thorns are by now too much part of þis account for me to drop it. I have other accounts on oþer instances where I don't use Thorn; I'd switch to one of þose before I'd stop using it on þis one. Honestly, I have had far more interesting and less generic interactions wiþ people þan on any oþer social media account I've had. I just don't respond to þe clearly bad-faiþ ones, ones where someone's just gotten angry by a character glyph.

4

showing small amounts of poison do have an outsized effect on models

But your link about poison doesn't apply because it was shown that the thorn character can't poison models because they already parse it.

I have seen no evidence þat it won’t work

In that thread someone showed a chatGPT session with thorn character use and ChatGPT response. They proved it didn't work to you.

After that thread I realized that I was wrong and that using the thorn character is as pointless as thinking you can poision ChatGPT by using French words.

5
piefed.zip

It's a proper name, like Thomas, which I don't mangle out of respect. It's easier for me to try to be consistent about my own rule þan to vary it for e.g. Thorn, Eth, Earth, Thanos, North.

I'm a fan of your work, BTW

5
feddit.org

I don't believe Þat it does anything against AI, eiÞer. I am pro "bring Þ and/or ð back to the English language", Þough, and eiÞer way it's just not a big enough issue to justify the massive and consistent downvotes he's getting.

-10
PineRunereply
lemmy.world

As someone who has enough interest in etymology to understand the thorn character, it feels weirdly natural to actually read modern English that uses it. Count me as part of the pro-"bring Þ and/or ð back to the English language" group.

That said, it's not practical to use it at this point because most people would freak out and get upset when they see anything they don't understand, and most people (at least in the U.S.) can barely read at a level comparable to younger children.

15

I understand them (and even if I didn't I could work it out from context), but it absolutely wrecks my reading speed, since I basically have to sound it out in my head instead of just reading the word. I hate SMS-style phonetic abbreviations for the same reason.

10
Grailreply

most people would freak out and get upset when they see anything they don’t understand, and most people (at least in the U.S.) can barely read at a level comparable to younger children.

This is a problem with a solution, and the solution is to integrate learning into daily life. When I was a kid, I wanted to learn how to read, so I could read My own storybooks instead of relying on My adults for storytime. These days, kids want to learn to read so they can post on social media. That's good.

Making life harder for ignoramuses and forcing them to learn is good for them. Complying with their desire to remain ignorant is bad for them.

4

Look, I have looked up what those characters mean every time these comments come up, but no one else cares or uses them. Including me. So I forget what they are, because it's not important to me. Then it comes up again in a comment on here and nowhere else and I just can't be fucked to bother looking it up again. So I don't read those comments anymore.

I'm not mad, or stupid. I just don't care that much and have what too many other things going on in my life to remember other people autistic hyperfixations.

This is likely the most common way people intereract with your comments. So if you want to turn every interaction into either a fight over those characters or only have it read by other etymology autists then sure, Have at it. I, however, want to be understood when I talk. It bothers me when people don't understand me. To me the point of language is to get ideas across through any means necessary. By that standard I really don't see the point in putting any effort to bringing these characters back. They do not help language to be better understood or clearer and that's all I care about.

And in my experience, trying to force changes like that through use will just get tiring and not actually change anyone else. This kind of change in language would take tremendous effort. Even if I thought there was a point to it, I would call it a pipe dream to make it standard.

3

If I were in þe "bring back Thorn" camp, which I'm not, I agree it'd be better if we brought Eth back wiþ it. Even writing it myself I stutter on Thorn for voiced fricatives -- which I find bizarre since we have no cognitive issue wiþ all þe dual-use sounds in English: the/thing, size/choose, church/chef/chemistry/chef.

1
pawb.social

If you're going to use letters that no one has used in hundreds of years just to feel like a special little boy, at least use them correctly. Thorn is unvoiced th, as in thorn. Eth is voiced th, as in either.

3

Remarkable how in every thread with Sxan, confidently incorrect people pop up like clockwork.

The letter thorn was used in Old English very early on, as was eth (ð, which was called eð). Unlike eth, thorn remained in common use through most of the Middle English period. Both letters were used for the phoneme /θ/, sometimes by the same scribe. This sound was regularly realised in Old English as the voiced fricative [ð] between voiced sounds, but either letter could be used to write it; the modern use of [ð] in phonetic alphabets is not the same as the Old English orthographic use.

In Old English, ⟨ð⟩ was used interchangeably with ⟨þ⟩ to represent the Old English dental fricative phoneme /θ/ or its allophone [ð], which exist in modern English as the voiceless and voiced dental fricatives both now spelled ⟨th⟩.

Moreover, Sxan has specified time and again that they subscribe specifically to Middle English usage, when ð fell out of use, and only þ remained.

4

Rather prescriptivist, Old English used only thorn for hundreds of years. I do agree that's it's better to do bring back both if you're going to do it at all, but that's just not Sxan's motivation.

1
literature.cafe

I started squinting real hard at the tesseract dev (before the controversy) when I saw a tesseract patch note that said something about getting rid of Þ (in some form, idr exactly, just that there was no mention of an option to turn it off). I think it's nice to have a few instantly-recognizable posters in the community, esp. when what they're doing is harmless.

30
feddit.org

That's certainly in character. Icelandic users be like "Fuck me, right!?"

14
lemmy.world

Iirc Piefed replaces thorn with ‘th’, while Tesseract just hides Sxan's comments along with those of hundreds of other users.

Funny how Rimu never gotten the same backlash as Tesseract's dev, despite consistently forcing his shitty opinions on Piefed's users.

5
feddit.org

At least Rimu doesn't actively hide his opinion-pushing, and occasionally listens to community input ... plus his opinions are not quite as unpalatable as Admiral Patrick's. But yeah, different threadiverse implementations feel like choosing between devil and beelzebub nowadays ...

2

his opinions are not quite as unpalatable as Admiral Patrick's

I've seen it mentioned that he apparently also had a blacklist of users, namely those who criticized him. But the linked post about it had an image as the central piece of content, which image was giving me 404 by the time I gotten to it — so can't confirm if that's really true.

1
Phunterreply
lemmy.zip

I think it's annoying but I just don't read their comments and move on. Same with people who use baby talk or overly refer to themselves in third person. It's not for me and I know I'm not gonna enjoy reading it, but yeah they're harmless.

8

Yeah that's totally fair. I'm not a big fan of all of them, but I'm ok with them doing their own thing.

5
lemmy.today

Sxan! I love his whimsie and really don't understand the flak they catch. It's a nice departure from the hate/doom feed. I have to actually intentionally read individual words. It's like unexpected brain cardio.

22
Grailreply
multiverse.soulism.net

Normies hate brain cardio, they want everything to be convenient and effortless. You and Me like having fat, moist, wrinkly brains. These people want smooth, dry, hard brains.

-2
feddit.org

People who consider themselves "more intelligent than normies" do exactly fit my assumption of who is into that shit

7
feddit.org

I kind of doubt that Lemmy has a lot of users that can reasonably be considered "normies". Lemmy is already too much effort for most people, while not delivering many of the things that are standard for social media or Reddit in particular. Plus, Lemmy is literally made by commies.

3

I didn't want to get into that discussion right away, but IMO they're tankies aka red fascists. Though most normies probably think that that IS what communism is.

1

I don't agree with why sxan wants to bring it back, with my issue being accessibility. Screen readers, people with dyslexia, and whatnot. It does nothing to better our communication with each other.

But they're a part of our community and respect that as their quirk. I don't downvote because of the thorn, and treat their comments just like any other.

13

My turn for an unpopular opinion:

I'm not going to self-police myself for anyone, and I don't think they should have to either.

7
Axolotlreply
feddit.it

What they do is useless as fuck and harm people that have reading disablities or problems with reading, eg: dyslexic people

Edit:

5
feddit.org

Valid complaint, but I doubt that most Lemmy users actually care this much about dyslexic people, they're just reacting negatively to someone who's acting a little different.

6
Axolotlreply
feddit.it

Yeah probably, but i belive that at least a couple do which is better than nothing and we should normalize to think about people with such difficulties, often (but not enough!) we think about disabled people but forget about neurodivergences and such in general, i spread this meme everytime i see Sxan in the comments and hope someone follow my example

3
feddit.org

I mean, there's a nonzero chance that Sxan themself is neurodivergent ... TBH a likely assumption for your average Lemmy user.

2

TBH a likely assumption for your average Lemmy user.

XD

2
dingusreply
lemmy.world

One thing that my brain is bothered by for whatever reason is that he uses the same character for both voiced and unvoiced forms of "th". That may very well be the proper usage, but for some reason my brain doesn't like it! Dunno why!

5

It's probably consistent with historic English usage, but the two places that still officially use it (þ and ð in Icelandic, ð in IPA (which uses a different character in place of þ) do it like ðat so we might as well learn from ðem! Also, Þ is a capital letter, most English words would use the lower case þ.

But boþ of ðose only matter if you do it for spelling reform reasons, which is not Sxan's stated goal.

5
Grailreply
multiverse.soulism.net

You should start using thetas and eths in your comments and show ðem how it's done! Brag about being ðe better user of θorns and θetas and eθs!

3
feddit.org

IMO þ is preferable because it's consistent with Icelandic and somewhat consistent with Old English (OE used only þ for a long time) and many oðer old Germanic languages. Is there a language ðat's actually used today ðat uses theta?

3
lemmy.world

Is there a language ðat's actually used today ðat uses theta?

Odd question, considering that it's famously a Greek letter.

In Ancient Greek, θ originally represented the aspirated voiceless dental plosive IPA: [t̪ʰ], but it later became a voiceless dental fricative IPA: [θ], which is the value it retains in Modern Greek.

Latin theta, based on the lowercase letter theta from the Greek alphabet, is used in Cypriot Arabic, Gros Ventre, Comox, Fox, Thompson, Tuscarora, Halkomelem, Wakhi, Yavapai, Havasupai–Hualapai, and Romani.

2

IMO it's a valid question, considering the large amount of differences between Ancient Greek and Modern Greek. I don't know many specifics about Modern Greek, for all I know they could have completely dropped the sound like many other languages did. The existence of theta in Ancient Greek tells us about as much about modern Greek as the existence of the runic letter that þ is based on tells us about modern Germanic languages.

Thanks for the info, anyway.

1

I think it's fun and it's led me down a couple of wikiholes about the changes in the alphabet over the years and I like learning things.

2

It's because it's annoying af to read and it's never gonna gain enough traction to justify it.

At this point it just feels like it's a way to differentiate themselves from everyone else which is valid, be who you want to be, but sometimes that comes with consequences and you can't really complain about it when you're the one deliberately going out of your way to do it.

You're free to be whoever you want and the rest of us are free to be annoyed by it ¯_(ツ)_/¯

2
TootSweetreply
lemmy.world

What does @[email protected] have to do with this thread? Are you thinking they post an outsized number of posts on unpopular opinion communities or something?

I'm not sure I remember running across any of their posts more than a couple of times, but their post history doesn't seem to intersect with unpopular opinion communities very much. (At least not as far back as I've scrolled.)

Or maybe you're talking about someone else or I'm just not following.

1
feddit.org

Most of his comments have a lot of downvotes (usually only the ones that contain a thorn), and he doesn't really post anything controversial beyond Þe orthography. This indicates that hating his Þ comments is popular, and Þus liking them unpopular.

20

Ah. Thanks. Yeah, you and YiddishMcSquidish explained and that makes sense.

4
lemmy.today

I think they are saying that the popular opinion on lemmy is to not like sxan. But they do like sxan. So their positive opinion of them is unpopular.

11
sopuli.xyz

What's wrong with ſlightly ſpecial characters? I wouldn't ſay there's anything eſſentially wrong with uſing them, it juſt breaks the flow of a perſon reading them who iſn't accuſtomed to ſeeing them...

-1
sopuli.xyz

アイ アム ゴイング ツ トライ ライツィング イングリッシュ イン カタカナ、、

イト ワークス!

2

You don’t even get that many downvotes before it stops being visible here. I once got something -1,000 on spez’s shitty site.

Then go in another thread and get like a dozen upvotes and you’re chillin

16
sh.itjust.works

I feel like deep down we all know this:

The Devil’s fiddle solo in “The Devil Went Down to Georgia” was actually better than Johnny’s.

Edit: thanks to these responses I’m gaining a whole new appreciation for the musical and spiritual symbolism in this song.

75
otacon239reply
lemmy.world

I mean he absolutely cheated by having a band to assist. Of course it was going to sound better. Thankfully, he realized it wasn’t as good without the band included.

19
gigastasioreply
sh.itjust.works

I’m pretty sure that CDB meant for the Devil’s solo to sound discordant and unmemorable. What I hear though sounds aggressive, passionate, and daring compared to Johnny’s “safe” catchy, melodic solo. Also they gave Johnny a call-and-response with vocalists so I’m not gonna hold the Devil’s backup band against him. Either way the Devil gave up that contest way to easily.

32
Carlreply
anarchist.nexus

You’re correct about the first part. The intent was for the devil’s part to be technically correct, but discordant and forgettable.

The call and response was because they were references to other famous tunes. Fire On The Mountain was an old folk tune. House Of The Rising Sun was an old folk tune. Etc… They were meant to be familiar and melodic snippets that people from his area would recognize, to contrast the devil’s forgettable solo.

11
eronthreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I always felt like surely the devil intentionally surrendered and gave the golden fiddle for some future nefarious reasons

6

Because with the contest itself he's already got Johnny caught on pride and greed, and now Johnny will go around telling other people they can beat the devil, making his job easier down the line. The only winning move was not to play.

2
wiesonreply
feddit.org

Giving him a golden fiddle (that probably sounds bad) cursed his soul with greed

9

I happened to notice in the Primus video that Johnny takes the golden fiddle and punts it away.

4

Given the Devil’s history, he really should have had him sign a legally binding (and easily misinterpreted) contract in blood and he would have had it easy.

6

On a technical level sure, but it was a fiddle contest not a technical contest. Johnny is the better fiddler since he knows the music the people like and dance to (a bunch of the lyrics are references to other songs). If the devil played his music to a barn full of dancers, the whole event would likely crumble.

9

If the devil played his music to a barn full of dancers, the whole event would likely crumble

devil: mission accomplished

1
squarereply
lemmy.zip

The devil won because he led him down the path of pride and claimed his soul in the end.

2

Debatable at best. The sequel takes place a decade later with the devil still furious that he lost the duel, and deciding to challenge Johnny again.

It isn't pride if you're actually the best there's ever been

2

There's a sweet spot. Unpopular opinions that get upvoted need to be trivial enough to not make anybody uncomfortable or angry.

Something like "Toilet paper orientation doesn't matter" is far more likely to be upvoted by somebody who disagrees with it than "Everything bad that happens to your children is your fault because you knew it was a possibility and had them anyway".

69

Human euthanasia should be legalized and normalized, both medically assisted suicide and euthanasia when the person is suffering but unable to make decisions for themselves. If it's an act of mercy to euthanize a pet who is suffering, then we should be able to have the same compassion for our fellow humans.

62

Are you ready for a super unpopular opinion? No holds barred? You asked for it:

Dogs suck. I don't like them. Glad if you do, please enjoy. But they slobber, shed, smell and are generally mostly a nuisence. They can be fun for brief periods, but they're way more work and hassle than they're worth. My brother is thinking of getting a big dog and I hope he doesn't because it would make me reluctant to spend a weekend at his place. I can't believe the number of people who seriously admit to loving their dogs more than their kids. I can't believe people consider themselves their pet's "parent". I can't believe how forcefully the online community backlashes to the idea of kids or judgemental of "ill-mannered" and neurodiverse kids, yet will happily say "it is never a dog's" fault, no matter how "bad" the dog is.

Cats can sometimes be ok, if they're not noisy and don't shed too much. But generally having animals in the house isn't great at all.

Thank you for your attention. Future Lemmings will look back at my comment history from unrelated threads and judge me for this, even though I've posted in the context of the current thread.

58
lemmy.world

Creating ANY kind of smoke should be banned in public. By public I don't mean just bus stops and trains and shit. Literally anywhere but maybe your house. And smoking indoors is even more disgusting. Smoking in your garden? Is there anyone living within ~20 feet? Forbidden. Smoke machines on concerts may have an exemption.

I also fucking had enough of people making fires every fucking time the weather gets too hot for me to keep my windows closed. Then my bedroom smells like the great fire of London and good luck having a good night's sleep like that.

53
Dicskareply
lemmy.world

Well, this is an unpopular opinion discussion. It does.

I knew BBQ would be a touchy one, especially among US users. I think it should be possible to have them, but preferably at places that can organise them in parks, or something.

31
Dicskareply
lemmy.world

I guess you just offended a BBQ lover. There's 8 billion of us, I don't see why one would downvote someone for having different preferences. Claiming it overrated was a bold move, though.

5

Oh I enjoy a good BBQ, but the sheer emphasis many put on them is... really weird.

I think many who would downvote me conflate the social aspects with the "BBQ" part. Just throw a damn party! I don't care what you cook but the point is it doesn't NEED to include one of the most wasteful and silly forms of cooking.

Again, not bashing BBQ as an actual cooking practice: A BBQ house restaurant is a beautiful thing if they're not fucking it up. Though that doesn't mean every John Doe needs a BBQ in their back yard for a party! It's about how weirdly popular they are in the US.

Not about how viable or tasty they are.

2
Dicskareply
lemmy.world

Good question. I don't see why people would keep their engine running for an extended period at home, so why not. Exempt on the roads of course.

10
tyrannyreply
crazypeople.online

i thought this was unpopular opinions! 'everyone should be allowed to drive on roads' doesn't sound unpopularto me!

3
Beaconreply
fedia.io

iirc smoke machines actually produce water as fog, not smoke. But i could be misremembering

8
Dicskareply
lemmy.world

I don't get the downvote, it's in fact an interesting question. However, sorry, I'm keeping it unpopular: healthy or not (research has shown it has antimicrobial effects), it's still an annoyance for everyone else.

I can walk around with a water pistol filled with vitamin water, shooting people in the face. Just because it contains vitamins (IT'S GOT ELECTROLYTES!) it doesn't magically make it non-annoying.

5

I have literally never met anyone who was annoyed by the smoke from smoking ceremonies. I've seen headlines in the news about racist people angry that smoking ceremonies were held at football games, but that was because the white people objected to the political meaning of the ceremony. Smoking ceremonies are held at special events, advertised ahead of time, and I've never seen the smoke go beyond the boundaries of the event to a visible degree. I've attended and been blessed at two smoking ceremonies, and they were both really positive experiences.

2

Omg please ban camp fires at national parks. I came here to breath the fresh air of the mountains and the forest, not to feel like I’m a coal miner in West Virginia.

3
Roliversreply
discuss.tchncs.de

I think smoking should be made prohibitively expensive. So much that nobody wants it anymore.

1

I think smoking should be made prohibitively expensive. So much that nobody wants it anymore.

Places have tried that. People just switch to cheaper and tax free contraband cigarettes.

1
Dicskareply
lemmy.world

I wish such a price existed... Unlike parking violations which are just parking fees for the rich.

1

This is one of the things that the Netherlands is doing well. There's a huge extra tax on cigarettes. I think one cigarette costs about 50-75 euro cents. It should be more imo but it's in the right direction.

2

How real are we getting?

::: spoiler CW There is such a thing as rational suicide. :::

52

Professional Wrestling is stupid but the wrestlers are Oscar level performers. When the stunt category at the Academy Awards matures, watch pro wrestlers repeatedly win.

41

The Fediverse doesn't need to become wildly popular with billions of users, and if it ever does, that will probably end up ruining it somehow.

41

Religion is for people who would rather be told what to do than figure life out themselves.

39

Veganism is a morally correct choice despite it not being perfect but many online vegans are insufferable

Most people here don't know shit about China

America deserves Donald Trump

36

Pedofiles, those that think and do not act, deserve more compassion by society. They can’t help the way they feel. Acting on it is obviously extremely harmful but they can’t even talk about it, even to therapists, for fear of persecution. The current methods of suppression are harmful and akin to conversion therapy for lgbt folks. We need to allow them to have a voice and access to non harmful animated CP with all consenting adult voice actors or AI. In out current society they are akin to trans people in the 1950s

36

unpopular opinion: AI can be extremely useful for programming and productivity if you use it in moderation

35

I know every generation says it about the next but gen Z is just fucking weak. Some great people and an admittedly, dealt a shitty hand.

But.

I'm going back to school as an elder millennial and my God, some of the craziness I've heard. A buddy teaches a film theory course a lot of kids use to satisfy early arts requirements at universities and he quickly realized if he didn't show the movie in class, 2/3 of the class wouldn't watch it despite being available through the school website. So, essentially, these kids (or their parents) are paying hundreds of dollars to watch movies instead of engaging.

The degree for which I'm going back recommends only 4 courses a tern with no work.I knew engineers who rocked 6 or 7, worked and were party animals.

Every advisor with whom I've spoke has basically said "look, if you're going to treat it as an adult with adult work habits, you can handle 5 courses without trouble." But they have all these disclaimers because kids and their parents go nuts when Johnny, who was just streaming hockey highlights all class somehow didn't get a good grade.

34

Driving a motorcycle doesn’t make you special and you should have to follow the same rules that cars follow.

If I can’t do it in a car, you can’t do it on a motorcycle

33

Here's an unpopular opinion for people to upvote because we're supposed to upvote the opinion we think is unpopular:

Linux sucks more than the users want to admit and it's fans are the worst.

If you have to learn to program stuff to fix something in your OS, then it's not a good OS. This isn't the case for most modern Linux, but there's many examples of just having to learn all sorts of crap just to make it functional. With the other two mainstream OS they are plug and play. Lately they have done shitty choices with AI and everything so that's not as much of the case, but at least there you don't have to go in and fix the code to make something functional.

If Linux was that great, you wouldn't have to do any of that. I find it's a weird parallel to owning a crown vic, where you have to pile sandbags in the back so it'll drive in literally any snow, and then when you talk about it people say it's a skill issue because they are hardcore fans of a dumb cop car. If you have to do something special to make something functional, that's not a feature, that's a bug.

And then, ye gods, the Linux fans. I know of someone who was berated for almost an hour over not using Linux. The person getting yelled at was like, 7. They are the smug Internet atheists of the tech world. They won't shut up about Linux. Their solution to anyone looking up how to fix something with their computer is to uninstall everything and switch to Linux, even if it's unrelated. If someone has a criticism for Linux they have a meltdown. They feel smug and superior in their choice of OS, euphoric and enlightened with their own intelligence.

That being said I'm probably going to switch to Linux anyway. Because fuck the changes windows made.

32

Anime is 95% shit and is only popular because it's from Japan.

31

The fediverse and lemmy in particular is a series of echo chambers.

lemmy.world in particular has a very homogeneous user base.

The "unpopular" part of this opinion is that on a variety of topics, any opinions which do not conform are heavily downvoted.

29

your tattoos "telling a story" is like a mandatory meeting that should have been an email about something I'm not involved with, and in fact, couldn't care less about. You think enduring pain makes you seem tough, but it just makes you seem like someone who makes poor fiscal decisions in this shitty economy. And, (as an aside) ink was supposed to make you stand out because it was supposed to be a rare thing than not many people did. Now not many people have no ink at all so, if you were looking to be "unique..." (I mean, just sayin.')

29
lemmy.world

My unpopular opinion is that /c/unpopularopinion is fine the way it is.

28
Beaconreply
fedia.io

My unpopular opinion is that /c/unpopularopinion is a garbage topic for a community, and it amplifies bad takes because even if people refute it in the comments a lot of people just read titles of posts and never look into the comments

15

Post that over there and see if the universe ceases to exist.

12

i cant believe theres people that tell autists to just "drop their mask". sure i understand it's tiring to keep it on, but as nice as dropping it sounds, i don't wanna die alone thank you very much.

26

You want unpopular? I'll give you unpopular. No-kill animal shelters are ultimately more harmful to animals than kill shelters.

Instead of euthanizing one violent or chronically ill or old or otherwise unadoptable animal, you spend your limited space and resources keeping it alive while you turn away a dozen perfectly healthy and well-behaved animals who could have been adopted but were instead let loose on the street or were euthanized elsewhere.

Even euthanizing otherwise adoptable animals is a net positive, because there are more companion animals in need of homes than there are homes willing and able to take them in.

As long as it's legal to make your animals make more animals, culling their populations will remain an ecological necessity. Which brings me to unpopular opinion #2: it should be straight up flat out illegal to own a pet that isn't spayed or neutered, no exceptions. I don't care if you think your munchkin cat's fucked up tiny legs are cute. The state should be able to seize your animals and have them fixed with or without your consent.

26

People should be allowed to have and grow all the plants on this planet. All drugs should be allowed without prescription. Prescription should be suggestion not permission.

26

It's too bitter for me to enjoy. Unless it's been made into kimchi. Then it's my favorite part.

8

I think the whole unpopularopinion stuff is stale and a bit unnecessary. Some opinions are unpopular for a reason and don't really deserve a podium.

21

People who use doordash and food delivery apps extensively, without a disability, are some lazy ass people, who deserve the shitty experience and high price it costs. Just go fucking get it yourself if you want it hot and fresh and not thrown on the ground.

18

That "modern" architectural style where you get houses that often have flat roofs, blocky structures, large glass walls and the rest usually white plaster or unpainted wood (idk the name but I think most people have seen it and I see people hating on it more often than not. I dont mean brutalism since what im talking about doesn't usually have unpainted concrete everywhere but it looks maybe related) looks pretty good actually. Not every example sure, but in general I find the aesthetic pleasantly futuristic looking.

17
feddit.org

I, too, enjoy blocky architecture. Though it's kind of impractical, large glass walls are a large issue in the summer (assuming they're not on the north side) and AFAIK flat roofs have relatively expensive upkeep.

6

Large glass walls are better applied if they have photogrey technology built in so that when light hits them from one side, they tint. I have only ever seen this in hotel lobbies.

4
lemmy.today

those apartment/houses are so ugly and bland, plus constantly building these types of buildings prices people out eventually

2

Is the architectural style inherently more expensive than houses with traditional roofs, or is it just that people who build expensive houses often choose this style?

2

I think you're describing neomodern architecture, which basically continues what has been established by the 1980s corporate style. However, the term seems to mostly be used for office buildings and such, rather than apartments and houses.

1

Are you ready for a super unpopular opinion? No holds barred? You asked for it:

Kids suck. I don't like them. Glad if you do, please enjoy. But they slobber, shed, smell and are generally mostly a nuisance. They can be fun for brief periods, but they're way more work and hassle than they're worth. My brother is thinking of getting a kid and I hope he doesn't because it would make me reluctant to spend a weekend at his place. I can't believe the number of people who seriously admit to loving their kids more than their dogs. I can't believe people consider themselves their kid's "parent". I can't believe how forcefully the online community backlashes to the idea of dogs or judgemental of "ill-mannered" and neurodiverse dogs, yet will happily say "it is never a kid's" fault, no matter how "bad" the kid is.

Thank you for your attention. Future Lemmings will look back at my comment history from unrelated threads and judge me for this, even though I've posted in the context of the current thread.

17

I enjoy cleaning the gross hair and gunk out from the shower drain, especially after I've moved into a new place. I am easily grossed out, so I find it stomach turning, but it feels so cathartic. The grossness is a part of that, I think. And then you have the immediate satisfaction of things draining much better.

I recently spent a year crashing in a friend's spare room, and I found myself weirdly satisfied that, being a household of 3, the shower drain would need cleaning much more often than when I lived alone. The fact that it's a gross chore that's rarely thought about until it starts getting quite bad means that I liked being able to handle this chore. Who else would be weird enough to enjoy the task, even as they're trying not to puke?

17

there should be a weight category/points system for vehicles on the road, for balance reasons. The lighter your vehicle the more heavy weapon slots you should be allowed to take so that you can punch up when returning fire while changing lanes

16

The US should have compulsory military service, once the Dem Socialists are in charge.

No buying your way out, no exemptions unless you're in a vegetative state.

Everyone has to do it for 2 years.

It will build more generational solidarity than anyone realizes.

If the rich kid has to serve alongside the poor kids, maybe he'll get a sense of what real life is like, especially if he's the dude taking care of the toilets, or recycling milk containers.

That and making congress like jury duty, one 4 year term for everyone

15

all money should be physical

currently only 1 of every 10 USD is physical and the rest are digital. I don't know how that works so I don't like it.

(hey you asked for unpopular opinions not good ones 😆)

15

Privilaged people should be sent to a third world country for a year or two so they'll realize what birthplace lottery is, how good their life is. Ofc I'm talking about the people who think they aren't privilaged but in reality they are.

14

Hydration. Until 30 years ago, humans had no problem hydrating themselves when water was available. Note available. It’s called being thirsty. All of a sudden, you must hydrate, you must hydrate. Somehow, all the executives at all the big drink companies got together and said let’s just use the word hydration and hope for potluck on which product of ours they buy. Of course everyone jumped on the corporate bandwagon and they are now completely converted to this weird idea that humans don’t know how to hydrate when they need to so they can sell their sugar laden crap.

14

As much as I understand the anti-car movement, people who ride bikes on the road instead of the adjacent bike-legal path are assholes

14

This community doesn't contain any actual shitposts, it's just a crosspost target for the 10 other linked communities in the rules, which means it's just another c/memes clone.

13

The people saying "extroverts need to shut up" are often the same ones posting "you are fine just the way you are, no matter how your brain is wired."

13

Money is imaginary.

It's an arbitrary point system that distorts real wealth and minimizes the real value of labor and time in the favor of the ruling class. Without the distortion of value money inflicts on wealth, there could be no institutionalized slavery, no billionaires, and no housing crisis. The "invisible hand of the market' claimed by economists is actually the very visible hand of Wall Street, the Federal Reserve and other central banks around the world actively selecting which types of wealth have value.

Source: Worked in the Stock Market in the 90s on the Options Floor. Watched market makers inflate their wealth by millions by calling down to the trading floor and starting rumors. Insider trading was rampant - I knew PeopleSoft was going to split three months before it did. Thirty years ago it turned my stomach to realize that every element of how we value wealth in this world is defined by drunken ex-frat boys hopped up on coke and Jack Daniels, breaking every rule meant to contain them and laughing when they had to pay the fine.

Today I can't even look at a stock ticker without feeling nauseous.

13

Many Lemmy users' (understandable) hatred of AI seems to have stunted their abilities to keep up with AI advancements. Some of them even sound like they're at least a year behind.

This is probably fine for most of them (sometimes I envy that, tbh), but some of them might be setting themselves up to be blindsided.


BTW, for people who absolutely hate the idea of learning AI, but might have to: I get it. I did too. Maybe I can offer a weird perspective after being forced to cross over to the "dark side"...

::: spoiler Weird perspective from the other side

(This might not apply to most people, so I tucked it away here to take less space.)

Do you find it really satisfying to "dial in" something? Anything. Maybe dialing in your home espresso shots, calibrating a 3D printer you built or modded, setting up a guitar to get the action and intonation right, getting an old motorcycle's carburetors in sync, iteratively tweaking a recipe to perfection – whatever might scratch that itch for you.

If you're way into that kind of thing (and maybe pretty tech-oriented), you might actually enjoy building AI agent "skills" (basically instruction files for specific tasks). On the first run of a skill, it might get some things wrong. But as you run it through each round of evaluations and improvements, it gets better and better.

LLMs' results are probabilistic, not deterministic. So to build something on AI that actually works well, it needs to be "dialed in". It scratches that kind of itch, for me.

(BTW, if that ever starts to feel too easy: Try doing it with a small model running on your consumer-grade hardware 😈. That's hard mode)

:::

13

I am pan as fuck which is how I know my penis has this power.

3

Lemmy is an anti-capitalist echo chamber and you will never good a good defense of capitalism here.

13

Wow that escalated fast. Did you not detect sarcasm in my comment? I apologize.

It is well documented and in books about heavy metal, and by music historians and other experts, that they all say that heavy metal was invented by the beatles via their song helter skelter. Of course there is controversy and not everyone agrees with this. But you have to admit it is a good song. It is a banger to me and many other people. This is a common opinion. So that is why I said the unpopular opinion that it is not.

2

"she's so heavy" released before black Sabbath was recorded.

1

Most comments complaining about vibe-coding are just butt-hurt programmers who are annoyed that Joe Schmoe can produce a decent looking website in about 20 minutes without having had to waste their formative years nerding out on forums and chasing stray semicolons.

Every time someone on here says "hey, I made a cool (but harmless) interactive tool/map/website" the top comment is always "this looks vibecoded as hell" or "whats with claude.md, asshole?". I'm all for the democratization of the economy so that social welfare, de-growth, environmental regulation and technological caution are rewarded instead of punished- including halting the datacenters and LLM proliferation for a few decades at least. But ya'll sound like professional chefs complaining that the neighbour bought a microwave and a thermomix.. or whining that they pimped out a cake mix instead of baking one from scratch. Just chill and maybe try to be helpful instead.

12

The universe (or at least Earth) is a factory that produces endless suffering, and it would be better off deleted.

12

Every conversation about the high incidence of SA experienced by women in our society devolves into whataboutism and scenarios where men were victims of false accusations or a bad divorce with accusations and the women being honest or discussing women’s trauma gets downvoted. I thought lemmy would be better but it’s really not

12

Honestly think that some gatekeeping is good, just memorize the lore, be chill, be respectful and don’t be immature, not everything is for everyone

11

The "running man" hypothesis -- the idea that our ancestors a million or two years ago were casually jogging after prey animals until they dropped from exhaustion due to our supposedly superior endurance -- is utter nonsense. It's absurd on its face and there is absolutely no evidence of any kind supporting it, yet it has become generally accepted as an incontrovertible fact about our past.

The man who initially proposed this idea in the 1960s (Grover Krantz) has become utterly forgotten and is never referenced by the idea's modern proponents, and for good reason: he was better-known as a staunch believer in the existence of Bigfoot. Also, for no reason I've ever been able to figure out, his skeleton and the skeleton of his favorite dog are on display at the Smithsonian.

11

We need to bring back testing to vote. No, not the intentionally obtuse Jim Crow kind. Basic civics knowledge like what year it is, what are the branches of government, etc...

10

they should eliminate the way jurors are selected, mostly because its poisoned fruit from the tree. because people are inconvenienced the moment they get the summons(ripping away from your jobs, and your income).

they should have a jury hiring selection instead, paid an actual wage of that state to be a juror, but have alot of them to prevent biases and its volunteering not "conscripted" by rotating between groups, because alot of retired people, or people who want to be on jurors never get CHOSEN. at the moment most jurors are biased asf in most cases, of the types they choose.

i also liked another countries method of jurors, having judges to determine the case and decide like a juror would instrad, because they know a layperson is going to be more biased regardless of how they are chosen in a juror pool.

10

We should try a worldwide intermediary period of 25 years where men would be barred from participating in politics. No mandates, no votes.

10

America was a terrible hegemony but better than the alternatives, as we'll soon learn.

10
lemmy.world

"Forrest Gump" is one of the most overrated movies in recent decades.

10
Glemekreply
lemmy.world

Might be an unpopular opinion that the 90s aren't recent decades anymore

21

Ok then, “Forrest Gump” is one of the most overrated movies in history. Honestly I hated everything about it and I never will understand peoples reverence for it. Shawshank is an infinitely better movie.

2

I would say if people are alive from that era its recent. Humans don't live long.

2

The Shawshank Redemption should have won Best Picture that year. The only reason it didn't is because it's a sad story and people like happy stories more.

8

I was a long time android user, 20+ years maybe, I don’t know. Anyway, I Switched to iPhone a few months ago so I could easily share calendars with family and use location tracking and AirTags. The phones are basically the same as Android. Different but the same and not as big a difference as I thought. Less different than moving from windows to Linux or gnome to kde or pen to pencil.

Rally against Apple or Google or whomever but I was able to just move on with my life and have a bit more convenience with my family. It’s fine.

10

Nirvana and The Beatles are super over rated and are only well known because they sold out/were promoted at the right place time so that record industry fat cats could use them to cash in on counter cultures.

Also Elvis/Led Zeppelin/Eminem stole music from black people and made money by making it ok for rich white kids to listen to.

Also, Drake is a pussy ass wannabe rich kid from the suburbs.

Sometimes it's painful to be this brave, but the truth must be shared. /S

9

Alien 3 was a better film than Aliens. Also, killing off Newt and Hicks was the right move to bring the film back to its bleak horror roots.

8

Angelica Pickles from rugrats is the victim of Parental Neglect and her parents deserve more hate than her.

8
lemmy.world

The biggest road block getting in the way of bike activism and expanded safety and spread of non-car transportation is the bike activists themselves behaving inconsistently and demanding strange, contradictory rulesets and concessions.

8
feddit.org

Bigger than the anti-bike lobbyism backed by multi-billion $ corporations? Also, which country? I'd be surprised if bike activists showed such consistent behavior across national borders.

17

Honestly, if you told me bike lobbyists were putting in spoilers to advocate for nonsense instead of clear common sense solutions I would believe you.

1

I'm probably gonna disagree with you once I read your other comment expanding on your views, but right now, I agree. The Vehicular Cycling style advocated by John Forester has been a huge detriment to cycling safety. Here's a 90 minute video essay expanding on how John Forester ruined cycling in America: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRPduRHBhHI

5
Tidespherereply
lemmy.world

Like, a lot of their behavior seems to be centered around gaining respect and focusing on having car drivers defer to bikes, while bikes slough off responsibility and behave dangerously.

For example, bike lanes. I, as a person who primarily drives a car, believe that what should happen is that the curb should be extended into the road, and bike lanes put up, on the curb, next to the sidewalk. If the goal is mitigating harm in the event of accident, then placing bikes beyond the curb will be the safest movement, rather than having them be a dedicated lane literally in the road. Having them be, ideally, up on the curb in their own dedicated lane is the safest solution we can come up with. The second, is that if there is no dedicated lane, they should be on the sidewalk not on the street.

We can do the math on collisions. A soft body going under 15 miles per hour with high alertness and high reaction time (a biker) is less likely to collide with another soft body going under 5 miles per hour with high alertness and high reaction time (a pedestrian), and if they do happen to collide, the injury will be very minimal.

But a soft body going under 15 miles per hour colliding with a 2 ton metal machine going 30 mph with lower reaction time (a car) is going to be more likely and lead to far more intense injuries for the biker.

But for some reason bike advocates don't want the safer option, they want to be in the road. They want to be in the road with the cars while cars give them deference and while also completely ignoring traffic laws that vehicles on the road are meant to be following, including them.

I live in a large metro area, and I have not once seen a biker follow any kind of traffic laws. They don't stop at stop signs, they don't indicate turns, they don't even stop at stop lights. They swerve out of the bike lane, into the crosswalk so that they can count as 'pedestrians' and then swerve back into the bike lane once they've gotten to the other side.

And given that, legally speaking, if there is any collision between my car and a biker, I am automatically considered at fault because I'm operating a motor vehicle, I want there to be as little chance of that as possible.

Like, I've got a long rant going here, but don't get me wrong, what I want is for my town to be safer for bicycle travel, and for all of us to reduce our dependency on cars for travel, but when I see the way bikers behave it makes it hard for me to believe that that's what they want.

6
Grailreply
multiverse.soulism.net

Yeah nah you're pretty much right. What you're seeing is I think the vehicular cycling style that John Forester advocated to his MAMIL cult. Cyclists only do that on Turtle Island. You should watch some videos of cycling in the Netherlands, it's exactly how you describe there, except on streets where the speed limit is 30km (19M) per hour and few cars drive.

On Turtle Island, a lot of what you're seeing is a practical response to poor infrastructure. Does the bike lane continue into the intersection? Do bikes get the same right of way as pedestrians in the intersection? Do drivers know that bikes have right of way in the intersection? Cause if bikes have to become pedestrians in order to not be cars, bikes will become pedestrians. That's just safety, that's just making the laws as they practically exist in terms of compliance work for them. I bet those cyclists would love a protected bike lane with raised crossings through intersections.

8
lemmy.blahaj.zone

I'm sorry... What? I've never met a cyclist who was on the road for any reason other than "it's literally against the law to ride on the sidewalk", assuming there even is a path for pedestrians to begin with. You've got it backwards lol. The people that design our infrastructure in the US are lobbied heavily by the car industry and incentivised to favor them while placating the poors on bikes by painting some shitty lines by the curb and calling it a day. Proper bike infrastructure doesn't have the issues you mentioned.

8
MrQuallzinreply

Selection bias. Just because you don't see it in your area doesn't mean it doesn't happen. I've certainly seen it

0

The more appropriate term would have been confirmation bias, but I'm not sure if it does go both ways.

In this context, we have both confirmed our individual experiences in response to if we've seen rude bike riders (horrible over-simplification of the comment but I hope you get what I mean). A premise was proposed, you said it's not possible since it's not something you've personally seen, and I confirmed that it is possible because I have seen it.

You having not seen it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It sounds like it's better where you are, and that's great! Hopefully the rest of the world can catch up to that.

1
Phunterreply
lemmy.zip

That's gotta be hyperbole or confirmation bias if you've literally never seen a cyclist behave well. Or maybe the bike culture where you live is terrible. My primary experience with cyclists is either seeing them in bike lanes and thus not interacting with them or being stuck going slowly behind them until I can safely pass because they lack bike lanes or sidewalks that aren't full of tree root bumps.

6

You know, it probably is confirmation bias, being honest. Though the culture could be terrible. But I honestly for the life of me cannot remember the last time I ever saw a biker stop at a stop sign, or a light. Though I do remember a hand turn signal a time or two though.

2
schnapsmanreply
feddit.org

I think you've hit the nail on the head with wanting bike traffic to be separated for everyone's sake. However, riding a bike on a sidewalk instead of in the road isn't safer for anyone, which is why it's illegal in many if not most US cities. I know it's counterintuitive. Reading up about it might help curb some of your frustration though.

3

I could definitely do that, and I probably should.

Also, haha, curb your frustration.

2

Do most bike advocacy groups actually advocate for not following traffic laws, or is that just something that a lot of bicyclists do because they think they can get away with it?

2

I agree that separating automobiles from cyclists is far more important for safety. I really like protected bike lanes for that reason. The barrier occupies a little space, but I think it's a win both for drivers and cyclists.

I've also seen photos of some interesting bike lanes that were elevated above the road, but also below the sidewalk level (between the two).

1

i see that, thats what happened in the west coast. now they dont need to adhere to red lights and get ticketed, or they become annoying and ride very slow in the middle of a street, and gets mad if you get close to them while stopping. also they dont slow down when pedestrians in the way too. bicycle advocacy groups definitely makes roads less pleasant to travel.

2

I got heavily downvoted on my post on c/unpopularopinion about Lemmy's absolute disdain of AI and not acknowledging its potential so it really is unpopular.

7

I hate the cranberries. They don't have a single song I like, and are responsible for the song that I like the least.

7

People take the "extrovert" and "introvert" way to far. Instead of being an observation of behavior, they take it to extremes, try turning it into a "quirky" personality and then role-play it everywhere. All due to social media. They talk about it like people who believe in astrology talk about astrology. And then they pretend they're super happy, when they're actually miserable and depressed but refuse to think their "introvert" persona is the issue.

7
lemmy.world

Scalping only works because that’s already the market rate, if the venue charged that price to begin with then scalping wouldn’t work.

7

Ticketmaster's real job isn't selling tickets. It's being the bad guy, so fans hate them instead of hating the band or venue.

20

Doesn't ticketmaster now allow you to re-list the tickets for sale within the Ticketmaster app? It would be smart if they did, because they would get a cut of the resale without taking the risk of the tickets not selling at high prices.

3

for things like trading cards(like pokemon), they can increase the pull rates to reduce/eliminate scalping because theres no need to hold on to the chase packs. but TCPi/jpan in thier infinite wisdom arnt doing that.

1

Scalping only works when supply is limited. Scalping will always work when demand ia greater than supply.

1

Sending humans to Mars is morally wrong.

There is a small chance that there is some other independent origin of life. Sending humans there with our clouds of microbes would make it impossible to discover.

We should wait until we've properly inspected it with sterilized robots. I figure this might take a few hundred years, but there's no hurry. It's not like Mars is going away.

7

If you're looking for intelligent conversation with people in a niche community, you're better off looking on Reddit than Lemmy.

7

Watching porn is morally problematic.

Most people aren’t paying for their porn. They’re watching stuff uploaded, for free/pirated, often without the involvement or approval of the people involved.

Porn also normalizes extreme acts - things like choking, which is more dangerous than actually whipping someone.

7

Social media treats Asian racism as highly offensive. All because a restaurant puts a sign that says they can't come in.

The US has racism where they threaten your life. They pull out guns, call police, chase you out. Sundown towns still exist. I would rather have a sign than sit down only to be told "We don't serve your kind" any day.

Edit: ah there's the downvotes for my unpopular opinion

7

Not sure if this is an unpopular opinion or not but IMO the whole concept of "support the visibility of opinions you don't like" was doomed from the start because you can't force people to play along with an alternate vote meaning (and the version this is an alternate to also wasn't the intention behind the voting system, so there already was a drive to use votes as support of the idea rather than the discussion).

Also, if posts make it to all, then there will be voters who don't even realize the community wants votes to work differently, even if they care about what the community wants.

6

I like that most of these have single-digit upvotes on a relatively high engagement thread. Y'all really brought your shittiest opinions :D

6

Rust is an "industry plant" language. There's an active campaign to shield it from criticism, by claiming no part of the language has any drawbacks, and that all haters are Brian Lunduke fans angry about trans people. In reality, it is being pushed onto things where its strengths are more often shortcomings, such as game development, where it's causing active harm, especially as you'd need something with an actual C++ interop, and not just a trendy language written by someone who got angry for management forcing them to write FactoryFactory classes for stuff that could been a single function. I get that Functional Programming is "mathematically correct", but it shouldn't be the only tool, and you just go back being the person who forced you to write the FactoryFactory class, just because they read Uncle Bob.

6

In order to protect students in school, students should be allowed to have guns. Obviously not all students, like not dweebs or DnD players, but popular kids like the QB.

6

Democrats AND Republicans suck shit.

Tankies are as bad if not worse than the alt-right

6

Daniel Radcliffe isnt as talented or even remotely attractive as everyone says.

JK Rowling is a POS shrew and all and she deserves to be prosecuted for her many actions but generally I think Daniel Radcliffe is a very mediocre at best actor and a complete sellout that would put Shane Gillis and Metallica to shame.

Also he's considering letting his own son watch the HBO Harry Potter show without even hesitation, he's pretty much a Judas to trans people.

Doubling down on your beliefs and giving money to terfs is no ethical way to entertain you own kid.

News source: https://www.ign.com/articles/watching-it-with-your-dad-would-be-less-cool-daniel-radcliffe-delighted-his-son-gets-to-watch-harry-potter-reboot-tv-series-without-him-in-it

5

AOC is a spineless milquetoast establishment liberal who voted to continue arming Israel (or more accurately, voted against a measure to discontinue funding).

5

The reverence for artists in our society is way overdone. I’m not just talking about the Andy Worhols and Taylor Swifts that make WAY too much money for what they give to society. I’m talking about the every day artists. People are way too excited for people who make art as a career, and many of them who complain that they are underpaid are wrong. Art is a fun thing that everyone enjoys doing. Be grateful you are able to monetize it at all.

5

Epstein didn’t kill himself.

There is a conspiracy. The fact that he was taken off suicide watch, nobody was watching him, and he was given the tools to kill himself was 100% deliberate. That’s the conspiracy.

I think most conspiracies are stupid, people stepping over $20 to pick up a dime. There are background actions driving events that they ignore but instead people look for UFOs, assassinations, or “second shooters” like they’ve got it all figured out.

5

I posted an unpopular opinion there and people just downvoted it and got mad, lol.

Basically I said that complaining about a paywalled article in comments is annoying and contributes nothing, especially if it's from an independent long form writer. If someone links to paid media and you don't want to pay, the post isn't for you. Just go away. (Or participate in the comments anyway, people don't read the articles most of the time regardless.)

Some people said "nooo if you make a post and I can't see the content without paying you're being a meanie because I can't participate"

Not every post is for everyone.

5

I dropped a very reasonable and unpopular opinion there and they totally roasted and downvoted despite that I played by the rules. Eff those kids.

4

Isn't that kind of just a problem with an upvote system being used for unpopular things?

Also I'll drop mine in here for the sake of it, although I get the sense that lemmy in particular will be more likely to agree with me than the broader population: I hate meta progression in roguelites. I still end up playing a lot of games with them because unfortunately that seems to be what sells in that market compared to more traditional roguelikes and if the game is good enough, I can try to look past the system. However, I do think that they just strictly make the games they're in worse. I could get into a whole rant about them, but maybe not here.

4

Lemmy tends to stigmatize usage if AI because of environmental impact.

I think using AI casually to shorten search for information (always double check it) or to create an image to be amused of or to use as reference to create my own art is perfectly acceptable.

Shit, each day I'm playing videogames, which burns much more electricity than a request to AI which translates to calculation of a function on several matrices. This is nowhere near calculating thousands of textured polygons 144 times a second.

I won't pay for AI tho if it becomes payed or subscription-only. Fuck it.

Also I'm a programmer and I've never used AI to write code for me, and I think it's terrible idea because it will make me too relaxed and dumb, leeching all the skill from me. Also it is useless for anything relatively complex as it will create more problems (bugs) than it solves, and it will be unable to fix them. Treat this as a side note and not an addition to my unpopular opinion about AI, because this part I think is popular.

4

I never liked /r/unpopularopinions because it was just a way to use otherwise downvoted thoughts to farm karma. On Lemmy, the karma is even more useless than it is on Reddit, and a majority of the posts in the comm are just dumbass rage bait.

4

Of you listen to some of Hitlers speeches with the mindset of someone not already rich in early 1930's Germany with what they have been going through, what he is proposing and who he is blaming doesn't actually sound all that insane.

4

Avocado is fucking disgusting, and no way would I pay a premium for it ruining my sandwich or burrito.

4

The EU is a trap. Once Russia and China are destroyed, the western Elite will also treat the average citizens like they treat Africans and third world Asians. The elite is only good to people they need and once they control everything they need nobody to fight for them.

4

I'm one of those that think that IA could be a real tool but sadly now capitalism greed made it shit. I think I could make a great game with an IA inside it and it would be successful.

3

No, they will get me killed.

One unpopular opinion which is safe for me to share is that we should all own less pets, and need to cultivate much more green space in our cities if we want to have them.

  • If you're American in the suburbs, this would mean people should not have lawns, but fill em with plants or crops.
  • where i live this would mean more pocket parks and room for wildlife to thrive. Which requires some houses and disused buildings going, or more roads closed up for pedestrianised greenspace.

One reason i believe this is because cats, for instance, slaughter loads of little creatures. Just imagine - if half the households on a street has their own pet cat, all the mice in the area are getting killed. They're actually so much better st getting mice than rats, too, so it barely has that benefit. Rats are huge.

Another reason is because dogs ... they should be working, and they should have access to interesting greenspace. Sorry if you have a dog and can't provide this, i just think it's so fucked up that we have more dogs in the world than we can actually take care of in this way. Would you force a human to live most of its life indoors with nothing to do? Dogs need more company than many people afford them - i remember reading that people returned their dogs after lockdown because they wouldn't be able to take care of them when working full time, etc cetera.

So I would only have a dog if I had a big garden for it or a huge park nearby. I would ideally have some sort of role sharing with neighbours or friends where we both take the dog on walks. And, best case scenario, I would only have a dog to perform a specific task e.g on a farm.

3

Punching up is mostly courageous rebellious and poetic satire on higher ups and their policies, Punching down is mainly spiteful and egregious hack comedy. But I think mixing them together to point out the deficiency and incompetence and straight up selfishness of some people and how people with power tend to manipulate and ridicule them while they cavern and bow down to their knees like with Always Sunny South Park and WKUK should classify as morally acceptable comedy.

Punch Up not down but if you do Punch Down make sure it also comes across as Punching up to the people in power and those less fortunate who either bow to them or think they're highly privileged and tend to punch down themselves.

Pretty sure that's what Don Rickles and George Carlin made their careers out of.

3

Charlie Kirk admitting that gun violence is a cost of mass gun ownership is the most honest thing that guy ever said. A factual assessment that every 2A supporter should recognize.

3

The debate over pineapple on pizza is old hat. It's played out. Boring, one might even say, though for the record I'm firmly on the pro side.

What's not played out is strawberries on pizza.

3

Politicians should not have security, if they are going to have security near them it should only be for the safety of the local environment and for non elected officials. My biggest problem with Jan 6th is that they were a bunch of filthy fascists and not that they wanted to lynch Congress, frankly speaking it'd be funny and politicians are easily replaceable even the ones I vaguely like.

Human life is cheap and in the case of politicians all but forfeited apon their oaths.

3

In 40 years, GenZ will be the new Boomers. They won't understand the new Generation D (for "dummy") that's too lazy to make their own bowl of cereal without a robot doing it for them. GenD will call GenZ out of touch because they choose to bathe themselves alone rather than shower with a bathing robot. GenZ will reminisce about the brief time they drove their own car, how this new generation just doesn't understand, and the few remaining GenX'ers will one-up them from the retirement home with talk about stick shifts. Oh, how that new lazy generation knows nothing about the hellscape of manually vacuuming the house. Or having a job. GenD will put down GenZ about not knowing how to live in a fully-automated world, while GenZ quips back about how they were the ones that built that fully-automated world. The big generational debate will be on whether or not to elect robots to Congress or just have AI run the country. And that GenD should liquidate and redistribute the wealth GenZ is hoarding. I hope I'm still around, and I hope there's popcorn!!! :-)

3

I believe in freedom but I also believe in accountability and responsibility

I believe in the second amendment but I also believe that gun permits, physiological testing, sanity tests, background checks and red flags laws

3

We need less beauty pageants and drag races.

Drag queens and Trans people are a way of life, and some of the talented, quirky and elegant individuals I've ever seen

RuPaul is a diva

3

Using "Hype moments & Aura" to defend a piece of media just proves your incapable of actually defending it with valid points

3

I'm leaning towards ending universal suffrage (right to vote) and instead implementing some form of 'transparent' epistoracy. World gets more complicated but people are getting dumber at an alarming rate. Idiocracy will likely manifest far earlier than 2500.

2

If you regularly use Amazon, Facebook, Instagram or ANY type of LLM, I think you're fucking stupid and should be dropped from the gene pool. I support Eugenics for AI users and people who order every bullshit, drop shipped item to their door.

1

Rap music is the least aesthetically appealing music genre in general. I simply can't stand rap songs with a lot of swear words in lyrics, supporting street chaos and sex activity in lyrics, fast and high pitched vocals. Just not my style at all.

1

Good mythical morning was never a good show. Rhett and Link are two of the worst examples of neurodivergence being repackaged as funny or quirky. Those two are both so disconnected from reality I'm honestly shocked there's not more industry gossip around working with them.

1

Nutrek is so bad, its not even palatable, but so many fans are defending it.(aside from LD and prodigy). just not good plot or writing, its more or less the same ending for each season.

1

Lets say music literally kills the art of playing music instruments. It won't, but lets pretend it does

So?

Really think about that. Music isn't gone, people just don't play instruments to make it anymore

OK, and?

1

People on lemmy are reactionary leftists ie they hate the right so much, they "reacted" against them by calling themselves leftists.

-4

My unpopular opinion? If you stand in the middle of a big city during Pride you get an idea of what Nazi Germany was like with the swastika flags.

Source I experienced this in the middle of Chicago a few years ago.

-5

The DSA, including AOC and Bernie to a (far) lesser extent, are becoming the caricature that fox news pretended democrats were. They endorsed not voting in 2016, 2020, and 2024. Mamdani is doing some great stuff, but endorsing some almost ML/tankie people who don't support Ukraine and essentially think the US could never and has never done any good ever.

Then they hide behind "guys we just want healthcare and workers rights" whenever they're criticized, which is just co-opting democrat messaging so they can shield themselves behind democrats and pretend their positions aren't so extreme.

-5

Apple users are technically inept morons

Men who drive giant pickup trucks are deeply insecure

People who want to live in HOAs are freedom-hating bootlickers

The only people who should be allowed to own trucks are laborers

Instragram users are all brain-dead

Privacy is important

People who do not learn how to fix or take care of the stuff in their lives are worthless

Men who watch sports, but do not nor have not ever played them are fat useless pathetic turds

Dogs that bite should all be euthanized, no second chances

Adults that buy and play with Legos suffer from arrested development and should do something useful with their lives

Your pedal bike is a stupid overpriced piece of junk, especially if it cost more than $400

If you wear sweats, crocs, pajamas or anything like that out in public you are a retard, go home and put on some pants

That ought to cover most things.

-5

Naloxone saves some decent people but on the whole its existence increases human suffering and is bad for society as a whole.

-7

Youre all radios picking-up a signal: there are no aliens, people who say they interact with aliens are crazed, the moon is natural, keep paying taxes goy

Whats stupid is that the "non-believers" mind has it so hard, they go haywire when confronted with this type of information. Why is that? Its not changing facts, its not re-writing history, its not costing them money, its not causing them pain

Aliens are here. They are disguised as humans. The moon is a base. The humans are a crop millions of years in the making. And they will absolutely destroy your life with invisible war & dream psychic attack when you find them out

-10

I love my car and it's way better and more convenient than even the best public transportation. Most of the people who hate cars can't even drive one or are too broke to own one. Yes, let the anger flow.

-11