Spyke
asklemmy·Ask LemmybySolarBoy

What skills did almost everybody have 50 years ago, but few people have today?

I suppose it would be mostly practical skills, cooking, fixing things. Usually had to be done by people themselves.

Maybe also mental things like navigating (with or without paper map) and remembering their daily and weekly agendas.

What other things would be a big difference with the people today?

View original on slrpnk.net
lemmy.world

Navigating a paper map.

You want to drive to a suburb of a big city. You have an address. The internet doesn't exist.

How do you get there? Well. You use a map. Almost every glove box would have a local and state map, if not a full map book like a Thomas brothers.

122
piefed.social

Even more scarce is the ability to navigate a city by simply understanding it's road system. Give me an address in my home city (a labyrinthine nightmare to visitors) and I can just drive there without looking at a map. It's practically a party trick now that I can tell where people live by just hearing their address. Which sounds absurd until you realize they no one ever needs to do that anymore.

27
lemmy.nz

Road networks in most cities in my country are like someone just dropped a pot of spaghetti. The oldest urban areas here are at most 150 years old too, so it's not like we can blame the Romans.

16

Me living in a city with Roman walls:
Are you saying I can blame the Romans for not knowing an address? Cool.

Actually, it's a rather small city. It's hard to get lost when you can easily walk from one end to the other.

5

You should become a cabbie in London. They all have to memorise 320 routes, 25,000 streets and 20,000 places of interest, e.g. hotels, stations, tourist attractions and so on. It's called The Knowledge. There's some evidence that mastering The Knowledge actually alters the structure of the brain!

14

I used to do this when I delivered pizza.bMy phone wasn't playing well with the GPS because I had put a custom ROM on it that happened to be too much for the thing, plus aging, but the ROM was too good in every other aspect. So I just studied the map on the same computer we clicked through orders on, remembered my route, and in a couple of weeks I didn't even need to look at the map before going around our zone.

Still helps me navigate cities to this day, even now that I don't drive at all.

Although living in a post-Soviet country helps with city/road design, making it rather predictable in ways lol

5

I was so confused by this comment until I remembered that US-american streets are planned and numbered. Because while I grew up in a village in the 90s, I wouldn't be able to tell you where the "Primrosestreet" or the "Blackbird street" is unless I had friends who lived there.

2
Mirshereply
lemmy.world

This only works in cities with naming schema that work that way. For my city, if I wanted to go to my old college, I'd drive to Columbia Parkway and have to take Martin Luther King Jr Boulevard all the way in, or divert through downtown to Victory Parkway otherwise. Some places in the city are named logically or you know where they are, but outside of downtown, you abandon the 5th/6th/7th sort of scheme in many cities in America that weren't initially Planned Cities.

Now, you can do this in a handful of American cities (Indianapolis, for instance), but not most of them.

1

You can still learn where the streets are. Seattle is one of the worst planned cities in America and you can still navigate it by route if you've spent twenty years learning it.

1
SolarBoyreply
slrpnk.net

I wonder if it took quite a bit longer for people to reach their destination. Because not everyone would be as good at reading maps (compared to simply following gps instructions) Maybe that made it more common for people to arrive at different times. or plan longer trips because the driving would take up a bigger part of it.

Also, when driving alone, I can't imagine holding your map. So you would still have to stop from time to time for long trips. And actually memorize the big lines of how to get to your destination.

7

I wonder if it took quite a bit longer for people to reach their destination. Because not everyone would be as good at reading maps (compared to simply following gps instructions) Maybe that made it more common for people to arrive at different times. or plan longer trips because the driving would take up a bigger part of it.

Oh it absolutely did. You would regularly have to stop (often after a turn or if you felt like you missed one) and reconsult the map. You just accounted for that additional time. Longer trips are often less of an issue, because its usually, you get to a big main highway and its cruise most of the rest of the way.

And plenty of times, you might get lost/ not be able to find yourself on the map. You'd have to pull over and ask for help/ directions. You might write the directions down on a piece of paper, but that doesn't do you much good if you missed a turn and didn't know it.

12
piefed.social

Depends on the area and how familiar it is and how hostile it is to navigation. I can beat the Google maps time 9 out if 10 times in Seattle because Google sends you through some seriously dumb intersections.

7

In Minneapolis, Google maps almost always tells me to leave the parking lot from work, go down the road, and turn left onto a highway during rush hour. No lights.

The way I actually go is to turn 1 block "early" and wait at the stoplight.

Sure, in theory it would be faster to take Google's way if there's no traffic, but again -- this is when I'm leaving work!

4

As someone who travelled for work before and after smartphones, absolutely. You couldn't just open Google Maps, search a business and go there, the problem wasn't going city to city, but finding a specific place in or outside a city. If you got a request to go to X business either you already knew how to get there, or it would take some planning.

Nowadays my company can receive a request from a customer in another country, and in 1 hour they can plan the trip, reserve the rental car, book a plane, book an hotel for the night. That just wasn't possible in the past.

3

The main maps I used for driving (back in the day, UK, 1986) were 'books' rather than large fold out maps. At local level, an A to Z. At national level, an AA road map, this has the format of a small newspaper, however in thicker paper.

2
Dasusreply
lemmy.world

Actually a much better way was to use a street directory if you know your way around the town even a bit.

Better even, and how we actually did it was giving instructions. "200m after the large tree by the field, drive on for about 400m, there's 2 junctions before and mines the third one."

But I also know orienteering ofc as a Finn

6
stoyreply
lemmy.zip

Swede here, how would using a street directory help you navigate without a map?

Sure, I know that at least here in Stockholm and it's suburbs that when a new area is being developed, they name the streets after a similar theme.

But knowing that Sommarvägen in Täby is located within the district of Hägernäs doesn't get you very far.

5

Ugh I hate those new suburbs with themed street names. They are always a maze and I get turned around in them. My mate Martin used to live in one of those where all of the streets were some variation of grass. We would be in the car and ask amongst ourselves: "Where does Martin live again? What was the street? Wasn't it grass something or other?". Only to get to that suburb and get really confused as all of those streets were named grass something and then we really couldn't remember.

But back then before GPS was a common thing and before we had cellphones, we had a sort of vibe navigation system. Getting to the correct city was easy, even if you didn't know where it was, there would always be signs. But then when we got near our destination, you'd sorta drive in a direction that felt right. You'd be amazed how often we just found the right place like that. Only rarely did we have to check our navigation book tucked under the seat or fold out a big map on the dash. Never did we need to ask for directions, that simply wasn't done.

3
Dasusreply
lemmy.world

You look up a street name. That entry tells you which street it begins from. If you don't know that, then you look up one further. And repeat until you get to such a main road you'd know it even after looking at a map.

So basically you'd look up the street and then browse back and after you'd have a sort of gps like instructions. "main road until you see X street, then turn there, then drive until you see Y road" etc.

I had several in the car I drove, for all the nearby cities/towns. Many in same covers. So it'd cover the main city and outlying towns. Never had to use a map. (Although again, I can if needed.)

2
stoyreply
lemmy.zip

I don't think I have ever even seen a street directory like that, only a street register showing the placement on a map.

2

"You wanna go down Three Oak lane, I forget what its 'proper' name is, but there used to be a farm there called Three Oak Farm, so that's what we all call the lane round here. 'Course the farm's gone. And so have the oaks. Anyway, go along there until you get to the field where the unexploded bomb was found back in '68, and turn right. Then left past the field where the cows got sick last year. If you reach shagger's hill, you've gone too far. Now there's a ford down that way, so you can't miss it. Except, I suppose, in this weather since it hasn't rained in a month and the ford's probably dried up. Most important thing though, you don't want to start from here."

3

Actually a much better way was to use a street directory if you know your way around the town even a bit.

You generally only had a street directory of your OWN town, outside of specific professional settings.

2

I had a few big atlases in my car. One for my city, one for my state, and if I went somewhere else on vacation or for business, I'd get an atlas for that area as well. After a while you have a library of them in a box in the trunk.

Driving and flipping through an atlas was the pre-GPS version of texting and driving.

1

I feel like it's still important to remember the numbers of some important contacts, so you can actually call them using somebody elses phone if yours dies or breaks. But I suppose not many people would bother

15
lemmy.world

Mmmm, interesting, can you list off that data along with your mother's maiden name? It's uh for a friend...

10

Sure it's [data expunged] and [data expunged] and [Error: Security Clearence not found]


Lol, sorry, you seem to lack the credentials. It's "need-to-know basis" only. :P

Seriously tho, my family is so like... idk I guess "emmeshed"? Like everything is so entangled.

Like my mom literally use my brother's legal identity to take out loans... and also some assets are put under his name

Also like mom used to not even have a screen lock on the phone until someone robbed her so now there'a a screen lock.

And like I have access to their phones... and sometimes messed with settings and mom got mad at me.

I don't even have any legal papers in my physical posession except like my state ID, cuz my mom wanted to "keep it safe" for me...

To be fair: I held on to my first US passport as a teen, and I kinda damaged it lol (got it just to make sure my Citizenship status is properly documented in the legal system), never even had a chance to actually use it since parents were so busy all the time.

If there is ever a family issue... oh shit we all know each other's info, we could theoretically do so much damage to each other like a family "civil war".

4

Same here. I even still remember my phone number from 40 years ago, living as a child in Tehran, Iran. Numbers just stick in my brain.

2
lemmy.dbzer0.com

We didn't memorise numbers! We just remembered them after having to manually dial them a hundred times.

7

That skill morphed into remembering user names and passwords.

5

Eh even before the Internet people had other tools to help with this. Physical books with people's addresses and phone numbers. Specialized holders for various business cards. Yellow pages and white pages. I suppose a lot of incidental memorization is lost but I don't think it's really a skill lost so much as the tool changed.

And those tools pre-date the invention of the telephone, so it's not like people spent hundreds of years memorizing phone numbers before writing was invented.

3
sopuli.xyz

If you knew how to drive, you most likely knew how to use a manual transmission.

57
SolarBoyreply
slrpnk.net

This one depends on where you live, I suppose. In some european countries it's still quite common to learn to drive with a manual.

26

Quite common as in, I've only met one person here in my life who can only drive automatic. Electric cars being more mainstream means many more people are driving automatic, but if you do your licence in an automatic you are not allowed to drive a manual car. So I'd wager over 99% of people can drive a manual. This is in Belgium btw.

8

Yes, true here in Denmark for example, but it is slowly changing on account of the rising number of EVs.

1
sorghumreply
sh.itjust.works

Lots of semi truck drivers know how to drive a manual and semi truck driver is one of the most common occupations in the US. Everyone at my company's location knows how even though we have an all automatic fleet.

Edit: Just to address the premise of the question only a couple of us were driving 50 years ago.

7

You likely already know this but if anybody else reading is interested, this is because if you test for your commercial license in an automatic then you're restricted to only automatics. The schools are still teaching manual, so it doesn't make any sense to learn that then test in an automatic and get that restriction.

7
sorghumreply
sh.itjust.works

Yeah it really is. Most everyone trained before the last 15 years were likely trained on an asynchronous manual transmission.

In good weather? Only the first few times. In bad weather? I'm on high alert like a dog who knows the mailman is delivering a vacuum cleaner. Take it slow, make sure the brakes work, and know where the runaway ramps are. A manual transmission is usually preferable for mountains for better control or for at least the illusion.

2
feddit.uk

Almost every adult in the UK learns on manual - I've known about three people in my life who learned on automatic and are only licensed to drive automatics - but with the rise of electric cars (and an increase in automatics generally) I wonder if my kids will learn.

What I never learned, but which my parents did was exactly when and to use the choke on a car. I know fuel injection made chokes unnecessary and I've never driven a car that had one.

6

I don't think so. Oh, wait, I have a petrol strimmer / bushcutter that has a choke! So, yes!

2
gigachadreply
piefed.social

In Germany nowadays everybody who has a license also know how to drive manual.

5

I have to add that you're 99.9% correct, there are rare people who only learned automatic and may only drive those. I know exactly one person, so it might well be 0.1% 😁

3
Kairosreply
lemmy.today

This is such a good thing. Whenever I look at cursive writing it's indecipherable. It being included in school curriculums really feels like someone went "no I'm good at writing! Cursive writing is good! Children need to learn it, in fact."

16
pelespiritreply
sh.itjust.works

Do you mean that you can't read it at all? It's really close to lettering, it's just got swoopies attached to most letters. There are only around 4 that you have to know how they're different, but the rest are super similar.

17
SolarBoyreply
slrpnk.net

This is definitely dependent on the person writing. Some cursive is illegible, others is totally fine.

17

That's true. I learned cursive first, but never really properly. Then learned print instead. Now my writing is a mashup of cursive and print, with the same letter in a single sentence sometimes using different writing styles. Great!

5

There's a bunch of different systems that vary how close they are to standard print

3

I've tried to read 19 century cursive journals and other historical documents. It's impossible, and I'm old enough to have learned it at school.

There's a reason engineers and technical disciplines used block/print letters.

2
jet
hackertalks.com

Meeting up with people, no phone. You arrange a place and a time, and you show up, if the other person isn't there... You wait.

It was super important not to leave people hanging

45
caurvoreply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Recently I have started having to ask hours before a plan is meant to execute, whether the other parties are still attending. Three times out of four I've been cancelled on - forgot, too busy, whatever the reasons were.

When was I meant to find out? When I called you asking how far away you are, only to find you're not coming at all?

13

Basically, those people were not going with you. I wouldn't consider them your friends. Friends would at least tell you they are bailing so you don't go

16

Sometimes I'll be getting myself ready to do the thing, but if someone reaches out and gives me an out... Yeah I might just take them up on it. I'm big on canceling plans

1

1975 is a weird place for that, actually. During and right after WWII motivations for fighting it were mixed. Obviously most white Southerners shipping off to Europe weren't anti-racist. Obviously Einstein was. The sanitised, mythologised version that people think back to today really got going in the 80's.

I remember last rememberance day in Canada, our public broadcaster did a live interview with a veteran. He was an actor involved in recruiting, and just casually mentioned it was a blackface act.

7

I worked in a private library that still had it's card catalogue up until 2005. People were always ripping out the cards (there was something like a metal knitting needle that passed through a punched hole in each card to stop idiots from destroying the catalogue, so the gobshites ripped them out instead).

The early digital catalogues weren't great so the old card system persisted.

10
SolarBoyreply
slrpnk.net

I never learned this. I always just browsed around and read what caught my attention. Maybe if I was doing research, I would have had to learn it.

3

It was a fairly regular part of our public school education

6

Doing nothing. That might be the biggest loss in the last decades.
There is just this overtone of restlessness and tension that didn't seem to be present prior.

Also connection with your local community. 50 years ago, it was basically a given. It was part of life.
Now, not so much.

13
bambooreply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

I heard an anecdote that one of the reasons older structures last longer than newer buildings was until the days of using Log Tables, engineers had to round up to the nearest values to match the values in the log table when calculating complex forces, and this rounding compounded when multiplied against other rounded values. Once computers were being used with design, you could calculate the forces exactly to minimize material costs.

16

I've got a log table in the back of one of my reference manuals. The results go up to 6 digits. You aren't going to get appreciable material savings after 2 digits.

And in some cases like structural steel, the built up members were far more optimized 100 years ago compared to today because the labor required to build the optimized structure was that much cheaper.

1

I think being good at estimations and having some intuition when something doesn't match up for a restaurant bill or grocery shop is helpful though. And I don't think a lot of people would get out their phone to double check the calculation.

But yeah, having this magic rectangle in our pockets is pretty nice.

2

Skill most people had:

  • Sewing, at least basic sewing. Tailors were expensive, and if you just needed to shorten a pant leg, or fix a hole, you just sewed it. Nowadays mending clothes is almost pointless, given they're basically made to get holes in them immediately.
  • Speaking quickly to avoid collect call fees. People would call home from a hospital phone, which would charge the receiver's bill if they accepted the call. The phone would ask for your name, and you'd say your message quickly, which lead to your parents at home getting a call from "Baby's a healthy boy" and then hanging up.

Difference: The whole world doesn't smell like cigarette smoke anymore. Even when I was a kid in the early 00s, it still smelled of cigarettes basically everywhere.

So y'know. We can't sew a patch on, or speed rap to avoid collect call fees, but at least drunk driving is illegal, and we have seatbelts

28
Starya67reply
lemmy.world

Still taught everywhere in Europe.

Fun fact: taking notes by hand helps you learn better than typing them.

11
xavier666reply
lemmy.umucat.day

I use a graphical tablet (wacom) to write my notes. If i write my notes, i remember them much better.

5

I would type my notes in class because it's faster, then rewrite them by hand to study off of. except by the time I finished rewriting them, I usually wouldn't need to study off them any more

4
Wilcoreply
lemmy.zip

They stopped teaching it here in the US, which makes me wonder what people will use for a signature.

3
Steggetreply
lemmy.world

Not entirely, my son still had to have lessons on it in elementary school for some reason.

1
Starya67reply
lemmy.world

Because it's better to take notes by hand, and you need cursive for that. Bonus: your writing looks like that of an adult. Bonus 2: you can read other people's writing (mostly).

0

I've been able to take plenty of notes by hand without cursive. It's a preference, not a prerequisite.

1
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Definitely more than 50 years ago, but this little piece of Americana is interesting

Families often had small nail-manufacturing setups in their homes; during bad weather and at night, the entire family might work at making nails for their own use and for barter. Thomas Jefferson wrote in a letter: "In our private pursuits it is a great advantage that every honest employment is deemed honorable. I am myself a nail maker."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nail_(fastener)#History/

22

Ah ha, that one I did not know. I guess slavery is also Americana, though a whole lot less quaint than the thought of industrious households making their own nails

3

I like the preceding lines

Nails were expensive and difficult to obtain in the American colonies, so that abandoned houses were sometimes deliberately burned down to allow recovery of used nails from the ashes. This became such a problem in Virginia that a law was created to stop people from burning their houses when they moved.

9

People should definitely do this more often. Makes it so much nicer to receive an actual physical card from someone.

Postcrossing also still exists, nice to send some postcards to random people around the world.

5

I still write thank you cards. People really like getting them. In my mind, it's worth the [small] investment of my time and effort to show my appreciation for something.

2
lemmy.world

Operating a slide rule. Managing a menstruation belt. Navigating adult life without having your own bank account (if you were a woman in the US). Mending clothes, ironing clothes, making clothes.

22
lemmy.world

Before adhesive pads were invented to stick to your underwear, you had to wear a climbing harness and use safety pins to keep your pad in place.

12

This seems like a skill that deserves to die. Adhesive pads, cups, tampons, etc. seem way better.

7
lemmy.zip

I remember seeing this among my grandma's belongings when I was a kid. It was... grimy.
I didn't have the faintest idea what it was.

2

The slide rule thing is real. Some of those guys didn't move to calculators when they came out because they could use them faster than typing.

2

Reading card files in libraries.

Servicing and repairing many things in the house, but devices were far more easily diagnosed and repairable due to not being computerized. Really the “it’s broke and I gotta fix it” ability across age groups has really dried up. Doesn’t matter if it’s changing a tire on a car, or a kid having to fix a punctured tube on a bike tire to get to their friend’s house. They don’t ride anywhere for that matter. Changing brake pads. Changing the air filter in the home HVAC. People don’t do this stuff anymore.

Being bored.

Reading newspapers, books, magazines, etc. I don’t think people read as much anymore.

Hobbies. I think they’ve kinda died off, at least the physical ones. Model planes, trains, building stuff in your garage, cars, etc. Some of it’s been priced out of range or has gotten too technological for some, like cars, but manually creating something as a pastime has really disappeared.

Remembering a lot of phone numbers in your head.

I’m sure I’ll think of more, but it’s been a while since I was a kid and thought about pre-modern tech society.

21
stringerereply
sh.itjust.works

Ooh I just changed my air filter for the house the other day!

Maintenance in general does seem to be something lacking in an age of disposable and easily replaceable items. Often times it is less expensive to replace vs repair, which is an upside down paradigm for sustainability...unless the retired item is recycled or repurposed.

4
lemmy.world

Good for you.

DIY filter change? $25 give or take depending on the filter. Service company doing it? $100 for the luxury of them arriving, $30 filter, $150 min labor rate to maybe do a service check, then whatever $ for issues they find.

FWIW think it’s good to have pros check stuff once in a while, they’ll see things I won’t know to check.

2

Physical hobbies are alive and well, but kinda niche when compared to things like video games or tv/movies. I got into model building a couple years ago, and there are plenty of folks who are into it. I would argue the hobby is bigger than it's ever been. Same goes for other things like r/c and tabletop gaming.

Also, don't forget about 3d printing, which would definitely fit as a physical hobby. It also augments the previously mentioned hobbies, as well as many more.

2

...but manually creating something as a pastime has really disappeared.

Or have gone commercial. People are definitely still manually creating, but a lot of it has been made to be sold, either for personal gain or to be able to afford to live.

2
CanadaPlusreply
lemmy.sdf.org

I'm going to have to look up this card index thing.

Reading newspapers, books, magazines, etc. I don’t think people read as much anymore.

Depends, are you excluding reading on a screen? The hard numbers are that people do way, way more in text now, and are better readers and writers as a result.

1
lemmy.world

Not OP, but I believe there is a big difference between reading a book or longform article vs 3 paragraphs in a Fediverse thread. I certainly feel it when I sit down to read longform (but i still often read longform).

3

That hasn't been my experience. I guess I get more immersed in something longer, but basically, so what? Either will help with spelling and grammar, either can give new insight.

There's plenty of longform garbage, too. A helpful Lemmy post can definitely be worth more than a Rex Murphy op-ed or the entirety of Das Kapital.

1
lemmy.world

But what are they reading? Being a better reader or writer is only as good as the information exchanged. Is it memes? Clips? How about per capita?

1

Yeah, it's possible people are reading more crap now. Although there was definitely less-than-highbrow literature around then, as well.

1
SolarBoyreply
slrpnk.net

I'd like to learn this. I used to wear shoes for more than 5 years in the past, but nowadays they don't seem to last even a year. Maybe I should search for better brands. But replacing the sole should be inexpensive and that's usually the only part that really wears down much.

4

Most shoes aren't really built to be resoled these days, they're out there and if they can be they usually make it a selling point of that shoe, they're usually a good bit pricier than other comparable shoes as well, probably gonna be about $250usd at the low end

Coincidentally I actually just sent my hiking boots out to be resoled. I have a pair of Danners, they cost probably around $450 new, and I'm getting their full recrafting service, so new heel counter, shank, resole, goretex lining, and if my shoe had any broken hardware that'd get replaced too, cost I think $260. Just a simple resole would be cheaper of course, and if you have a decent local cobbler they could probably beat that price.

I've had them about 4 years, and at this point the sole is pretty well-worn-out but the uppers are still in pretty good shape. They've been worn pretty close to daily, and have some hard miles on them.

I definitely feel that I've gotten my money's worth, before these I probably got new boots every 2 years or so and usually spent about $200 on a pair, so if these last me another 4 years (and I don't have any reason to think they won't, but there's no guarantee what misadventures my boots might go through in the next 4 years) I'll have even come out a bit ahead on them vs buying cheaper boots.

These are hiking boots, so I'm not exactly keeping them mirror-polished or anything, so care is pretty minimal, clean them with saddle soap once in a while, wipe them down with mink oil or whatever your preferred leather conditioner/waterproofing stuff is a couple times a year (I generally try to do at least twice a year, maybe a bit more frequently if they're getting a lot of hard use- getting really dirty, worn in the winter or near the ocean where they may be getting salty, etc.)

Also not shilling specifically for Danners, I've been very happy with them so far, but there's plenty of other brands out there that are as good or better, and of course everyone has their personal preference. My next pair may or may not be danners, I do have my eye on some boots from higher-end manufacturers if my budget allows.

4
SolarBoyreply
slrpnk.net

I, for one, have a great attention span. I can easily spend several hours browsing lemmy shitposts.

16

What other things would be a big difference with the people today?

The lack of cigarette smoke everywhere, at least in the US and probably most other developed nations. In 1965, around 43% of American adults smoked. Today, just over 11% do. You no longer have to sit in the "non-smoking" section of a restaurant that still smells strongly of stale cigarettes. They no longer put ash trays or cigarette lighters in vehicles, which were a standard feature up to at least the late 90's.

18
SolarBoyreply
slrpnk.net

Glad about that. I can't imagine living in that kind of environment for long

8

Having grown up on the cusp of smoke free legislation in my country I remember what it's like first hand.

It is sooOooOOoo much better now without smoking everywhere.

5

Glad about that. I can’t imagine living in that kind of environment for long

It wasn't bad. One of the skills lost since then was how not to be a fussy Felix Unger bloodhound. You didn't notice it. People are much more sensitive to smells today. Between the body spray and the air fresheners, the modern world still stinks, it just stinks pretty. The other nice thing was that there was a clear distinction between places that were uptight and relaxed. Today the smell of a church and the smell of a bar are almost the same.

Edit:

Also, one of the skills lost today is handling fire. Back then everybody lit a match or flicked their Bic 20+ times a day. Casually, effortlessly and elegantly handling flame was a skill almost every sophisticated adult had. Today seeing a 26 year old strike a match is like watching a 6 year old strike a match in the 80s. It's very apparent in films that are period pieces when the actor is kind of terrified of the match they just clumsily struck.

1
piefed.world

They no longer put [...] cigarette lighters in vehicles

I thought they still did? Just isn't referred as "Cigarette lighter" anymore?

5

Automotive cigarette lighters eventually developed a secondary use as an auxiliary power port. The modern ones don't actually function as a cigarette lighter though. They don't have the clips needed to hold the lighter coil in the socket.

7

I've been in 3 different people's cars that didn't even have the cigarette lighter hole, and I believe they stopped including the actual lighter in cars before they switched to just having USB outlets in cars

EDIT: The cars were 2015, 2020, and 2021 models. My old 2004 had the cigarette outlet

3
piefed.world

Ahhh. The cars I've been in (the most) are pre-2015 (2007 and 2014). Thanks!

2

My 2025 (urgh, humble brag) car has a "12V port" that can deliver up to 180W. It also has one in the boot/trunk too.

We use it to power an air pump for inflating inflatable camping things.

2
lemmy.cafe

Dialing in a TV station, with the different bands and antenna tweaking. Then keeping track what and when your shows come on.

Balancing your checkbook.

18

Dialing in a TV station, with the different bands and antenna tweaking.

That's what younger siblings were for. Holding the rabbit ears or turning the antenna mast.

4

I grew up reading analog clocks and it only clicked in the last year what top (the hour) and bottom (half hour) of the hour meant.

2
piefed.world

I have a few friends who know how to sew, and they all say it's an essential skill, and they did actu use that skill. I am also thinking of picking it up....

For context, me (and my friends) are all under 20

7

Its a great skill to have, if you fix something a bit janky, no one is going to notice.

Getting a basic sewing machine, while absolutely not required, opens the door to more efficient repairs or modifications. Like shortening sleeves or pants that are too long. (You also don't have to learn to do different stitches, you select one on the machine and let it do the hard part)

2

Surprising how fast it can change. I feel like knowing basic mending is still very useful today.

5

It's absolutely an essential skill. I have clothes going on 20 years old that still look quite nice because I am capable of mending them. Even if you don't ever use a sewing machine, hand-sewing basics are so useful.

3

Reading cursive writing (especially from the 18th century or earlier).

14

There is no significant loss in total skill with each newer generation. The paradigm is constantly shifting. Humans have always adapted and learned to manage whatever is readily available to them and how to maintain it. Your parents complain you don't know their vintage skills. You complain they aren't learning new skills. You complain younger people don't know your "necessary" (vintage) skills.

"The children now love luxury. They have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise" - some guy in 1907 summarizing Greek beliefs.

The generation that can navigate whatever it is kids navigate (flipper zero?) can't modify an OS. The generation that can modify an OS probably can't tune a carburetor. The generation that can tune a carburetor probably can't change a horse shoe. Your skills are based on what you have to do every day. As technology removes the need to manage those things, the skill is lost and new skills replace it.

13
lemmy.zip

Social skills. Everyone, especially the young, seem more inward focused than ever.

12
SolarBoyreply
slrpnk.net

Not sure I would say inward focused. That can be a good thing in a lot of situations.
I would say they are more outward focused, but not on other people, but rather the concepts, ideas, and beliefs that are pushed upon them by whatever is pushed on them by the social media platforms and news they engage with (instead of talking to actual people, or taking time to do introspection.)

3
CanadaPlusreply
lemmy.sdf.org

People talk a lot about the internet causing social corrosion various ways, but this might be the most real. Back in time, and still to some degree in rural areas, in-person organisations (churches, unions, clubs) had tons of political power. Getting a endorsement from them often meant more than your platform or soundbites or political brand.

The new way isn't bad per se, but it's not time-tested, and it's not looking very stable so far when imposed on 20th century institutions.

2

Having less power in those centralised organisations is definitely a good thing.

Online communities are helpful, and also sometimes necessary for those who are not able to easily participate in local communities, or who live in a place where nobody is interested in the same things as them.

And still I found it much better to interact with people in-person.
Even when their interests might not align perfectly with yours, it's just much more fulfilling than online-only interactions.

1

Navigation. You used to remember the way to all these places. Now it's just on the phone.

12
lemmy.world

Using a rotary phone. looking up a book in a card catalog. The ability to solve your own problems.

11
MehBlahreply
lemmy.world

They don't/cant learn that in today's world. They have abandoned learning and switched it out with answers to everything.

3
SolarBoyreply
slrpnk.net

I wish I was better at solving my own problems. But also depends on what you consider solving your own problems is, exactly.
I learned early not to rely on other people, so I tended to look up everything I need in books and online.

But some problems are not solved with research, or suggestions from others online.
Some problems are only solved by giving yourself time to process them yourself.

This is something I'm still lacking in, perhaps because I always searched outside of myself for solutions.
I'm amazed by the solutions some people can come up with without having access to information from books/online.

4

It sounds like you are better at it than most kids these days. I look up solutions all the time. No sense reinventing the wheel. I've also spent days on some problem without looking elsewhere for a solution. The dopamine from solving a problem myself is excellent.

3
angrystegoreply
lemmy.world

Was with you untill the solve your own probles thing. I know of way many people who did not solve their own problems 50 yrs ago, passing their problems to their children instead.

4
MehBlahreply
lemmy.world

When I was very young around 50 years ago I built a small flashlight using a plastic tick tack box, paper clips,a flashlight bulb and two AAA batteries. No one showed me how I just figured it out. So just because you couldn't see the problem solvers among you doesn't mean they were not there.

1
angrystegoreply
lemmy.world

Yep, and that is still true. I was thinking more of the what to make of your life, family and mental health problems solving though.

1
MehBlahreply
lemmy.world

I don't know if you are asking a question about my life choices but I see a therapist regularly. My children answer the phone when I call and when something breaks people come to me for a fix. I'm fine, better than most.

1

Oh, I meant it in general, wasn't talking about you specifically, I can see how my use of "you" could lead to confusion though. Anyway, it's nice to hear you're doing well :)

1

People got more practice solving their own problems, anyway. Education to use for that was unambiguously lower, though, and there was plenty of people just not solving problems.

1
fedia.io

Huh? Who doesn't know how to cook? It is easy and very common in mowt circles. I think you need to readjust your life if you think that is rare. eating out is not only expensive it is also unhealy most of the time.

10
SolarBoyreply
slrpnk.net

Well, that's what I thought too. My family used to, and still does cook almost every meal. Only eating out for special occasions. But asking around with colleagues in the place I live now. It's surprising how many order takeout or go to a local restaurant for dinner.

6

I used to know a guy at church who said he didn't know how to cook and went to the convenience store for every meal.

3
lemmy.world

And now men cook.....im pretty sure my grandpa never cooked a damn thing.

3
bluGillreply
fedia.io

From looking at history this seems confined to one generation - in 1950 the "ideal family" was a man going to work 9-5, and the women staying home to cook/clean. For a while it even worked out that way for a lot of people, but over the 1960s there was a culture revolution and women started working, while men learned to help. This process is continuing on.

Look longer over history though you see that in almost all cultures men would regularly get into situations where there were no women around to cook. Hunting, or working in the field all day often meant men and women were separated and so men had to cook for themselves if they were to eat. (women between 15 and 40 were regularly pregnant or nursing a baby - men cannot do these things, and they limit what a woman can do so some activities become men's work.) Not to mention war which typically was mostly men, though "camp followers" did cook for the army in some cases.

Which is to say, maybe your Grandpa didn't cook. However that men in his generation didn't cook was an outlier. Over history men and women both cooked.

2

There were a lot of older ladies sewing when I was growing up. I think nowadays we just throw clothing away and buy new stuff. At least until lately when there was a large middle-class. Typewriter repair was a thing in my town as well.

10

Want to say general automotive competency. As in you had to deal with carburetors on cold days so you had to adjust intake, spray starting fluid into it, know about oil pressure and warming it up, etc. Some people are barely able to conceptualize putting gas into the thing now.

Knowing the prices of typical appliances and such. Example, modern The Price is Right compared to the 80s and before. 50 years ago, people were more likely to know the prices for a multitude of reasons, one being there were more home owners in those generations who might be looking at replacements or upgrades. Now, home ownership is less and I couldn't begin to tell you the price of a washing machine being a renter.

9

Also, there were like 3 washing machines on sale. Now you have 50/manufacturer.

5

Doubt it. We like to think this becaus we only recall the smart ones. The stupid were left behind. We as society have way more exposure to each other now. Doesn't make people from 50 years ago any more clever. Especially with less education.

10
lemmy.nz

This is the origin of "phreaking". Tapping out the pulses (on the 'hang up button') on a rotary public payphone to make free calls.

6

Photo retouching as a physical trade. Colour photography and instant development killed the art of retouching black and white photos almost from one day to the next, because nobody could retouch colour photos and nobody wanted to pay for retouching black and white photos anymore, when Polaroids were easy to reshoot. My grandparents did it, but had to close the shop in the 1980s. I still have a few of their pens, but most of it ended up in a museum.

50 years ago was in the 1970s. I actually think more skills were lost just in the 20 years prior to that than after. This is due to mass production and plastic, which created the consumer products since the 1960s. Prior to that, you'd actually consider all products (except food) to be a purchase for life.

8

Learning how to do things yourself because you had to. Now people have an app for getting somone out to hang a picture

8
quokk.au

Chopping wood, managing a fire.

In the 80s we had to light a wood-fire hot water system. Chopping wood and managing the fire was one of our chores as kids. We had a wood stove in the kitchen too but never cooked with that because we had a gas oven as well.

8

First thing that came to my mind, as well. They say people reacted more intelligently to building fires in that past for the same reason. Not that it mattered much if you go all the way back before fire codes.

Way too often I see someone making a camp fire by just kind of stacking store-bought wood, and drenching it in accelerant, which is probably related. Bitch, if you just want quick heat without thinking about it, why not a space heater?

1

I always prided myself on driving a manual, never bothered paying for an auto. Then I bought and EV and dont even have a transmission any more

2
eightpixreply
lemmy.world

For those who don't understand these words, I'll translate: driving a motor vehicle (car, truck, van, or other) with a manual-shift or stick-shift transmission.

In an automatic transmission vehicle, you have steering, gas, and brakes. The car itself decides automatically which gear to be in based on several conditions. This is the form of driving to which most are accustomed.

The rest of us can actually drive.

-4
lemmy.nz

If we're going to gatekeep.

Then only those of us hand cranking the engine to start it model-T style can actually drive.

9
XeroxCoolreply
lemmy.world

Yes, when temperature management was a proper skill. Now we drive cars with such sufficient cooling systems they never overheat! Imagine, just putting it in gear and driving through to your destination, no matter the conditions or duration. And fuel management! Gas stations everywhere? A fuel gauge? A range calculator? So lazy. Whenever that commenter grew up was the absolute peak of skill. laughs in horse mechanic

7
lemmy.nz

If you're not driving a 0-0-2 steam locomotive are your even driving?

3

Ma'am, I'm going to have to ask you to please stop doing wheels in the locomotive and return it to a 4-4-2 configurarion

2
SolarBoyreply
slrpnk.net

I only know some basic knots.
What I do know are some shoelace knots, like this fastest shoe knot. (this website in general has a lot of interesting information on shoelacing)

1
Echolynxreply
lemmy.zip

That might be fast, but it doesn't look very secure... the surgeon's knot seems better for actually staying up.

2
SolarBoyreply
slrpnk.net

It actually holds up perfectly fine. Have been using it for more than 20 years, no issues.

2

I don't know why I spent a good minute looking at that, studying exactly how to do it. My shoes don't have shoelaces....

1
lemmy.zip

In this thread....many things I know how to do. I guess I'm an old soul, or something.

6
SolarBoyreply
slrpnk.net

I think it's good if you can do many of these things. No judgment if somebody can't. But I feel it's good to know these things.

And who knows, if things get more expensive and uncomfortable for a while, you will know how to deal with it easily.

5

No judgment if somebody can't.

Absolutely. Most of these that I know are down to either dumb luck or being blessed with too much free time when I was younger. And I guess being blessed with many hand-me-downs.

And who knows, if things get more expensive and uncomfortable for a while, you will know how to deal with it easily.

Yes. I'm really thankful for that.

I feel that I had it pretty easy, as a child; but sometimes I recognize that parts of the way I was raised are because of hard times seen by people who raised me.

4

What would you consider good judgement? Not that I disagree with you.
In some way, the current environment feels like it forces you to practice your judgement more so than was necessary in the past.

But I suppose many don't really bother.

3

Ah yes, the 1970's, a famously peaceful and rational time.

I kinda wonder if people are thinking back further than 50 years here.

1
lemmy.ml

Social Skills. Navigation. Do it yourself. Touching Grass.

5

If you consider them to be inversely proportional to social disorder, social skills would be at a nadir in 1975. But, there's other ways to look at it, of course.

2

Drinking and driving. Get blasted, put the kid on your lap, and park anywhere on the front yard.

3

-. --- ....... .-- .- -.-- --..-- ....... . ...- . .-. -.-- -... --- -.. -.-- ....... -.- -. --- .-- ... ....... -- --- .-. ... . ....... -.-. --- -.. . -.-.--

2