Fixed my mouse today
my 3d printed mouse broke - the click upper didn't up anymore. With a new 3d printed part, the click upper now ups again.
my 3d printed mouse broke - the click upper didn't up anymore. With a new 3d printed part, the click upper now ups again.
Make sure to pick up your diabetes cupcake today
Often maligned for the damage glucose spiking foods and seed oils have done. Saturated fat has been the whipping boy of observational based researchers since the 1960s. That vilification doesn't hold up if you use a unbiased eye to review the literature: Saturated Fat from animal sources is good for you!
::: spoiler saturate fat easy to read article Saturated fat and health risks: the evidence to date
convincing evidence for a direct link between saturated fat and heart disease is lacking.
:::
::: spoiler saturated fat published paper Saturated Fats and Health: A Reassessment and Proposal for Food-Based Recommendations: JACC State-of-the-Art Review
Most recent meta-analyses of randomized trials and observational studies found no beneficial effects of reducing SFA intake on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and total mortality, and instead found protective effects against stroke.
Whole-fat dairy, unprocessed meat, and dark chocolate are SFA-rich foods with a complex matrix that are not associated with increased risk of CVD. The totality of available evidence does not support further limiting the intake of such foods.
We have done a deep dive on this paper before: https://discuss.online/post/28134438
:::
The evidence against red meat is tenuous, relying on observational epidemiology (again), it doesn't hold up to unbiased examination.
::: spoiler animal protein easy to read article
What does the research show with respect to meat’s potential harm?
the data linking fat to cancer risk are inconsistent, incomplete, and unreliable.
The most consistent (albeit weak) associations between cancer risk and fat have been found over the years in observational studies looking at red meat and the risk of colorectal cancer. However, two more recent, important papers published in Annals of Internal Medicine make the case that available evidence from randomized controlled trials and observational studies does not support recommendations to lower red meat intake for prevention of cancer or heart disease.
For more on the science behind concerns about red meat and cancer, see our evidence based red meat guide.
Another question that has received much attention over the years is whether there is an association between fat intake and breast cancer. The Women’s Health Initiative (WHI), the largest randomized trial to address this issue, found no statistically significant reduction in breast cancer risk with a lower fat diet. In addition, a meta-analysis of seven prospective studies including 337,000 women likewise showed no association between fat intake and breast cancer risk
:::
::: spoiler animal protein published paper What is the role of meat in a healthy diet?
Despite claims by the World Health Organization (WHO) that eating processed meat causes colon cancer and red meat probably causes cancer, the observational data used to support the claims are weak, confounded by multiple unmeasured factors, and not supported by other types of research needed for such a conclusion. Although intervention studies are designed to test the validity of associations found in observational studies, two interventions of low-fat, low-meat diets in volunteers that failed to find a benefit on cancer were not considered in the WHO decision.
It is likely that the association of red-meat consumption with colon cancer is explained either by an inability of epidemiology to detect such a small risk or by combinations of other factors such as greater overweight, less exercise, lower vegetable or dietary fiber intake, and perhaps other habits that differentiate those who eat the most meat from those who eat the least.
We have done a deep dive on this paper before: https://discuss.online/post/25112884
:::
The key concept is a food source that has been consumed in abundance throughout all of recorded history is not the cause of modern chronic diseases that only have skyrocketed in the last 100 years.
Fat and Meat didn't cause type 2 diabetes, cancer, heart attacks, obesity to explode - something that happened in the last 100 years did.
::: spoiler What if I'm wrong?
I'm sure there are lots of people chomping at the bit to tell my why I'm wrong: and I'm open to that. I just ask any evidence you want to argue with you have actually read completely yourself
it would be nice if the counter evidence
just remember: observational data (even meta-analysis of observational data) cannot inform us of cause and effect. The problem with epidemiological studies
If a hypothesis relies only on observational data, it must account for observational data in the other direction. If a hypothesis doesn't account for discordant observational data, it isn't a good hypothesis and must be discarded. i.e. the anti-meat theory needs to account for meat positive observations
:::
::: spoiler Good faith guidelines for literature discussion
:::spoiler graphical flare :::
95% of every nutritional discussion on lemmy.
update - original art from https://poorlydrawnlines.com/comic/mad/
The problem with meat..... isn't the meat - it's the bad company it keeps
We are taught that meat is an unhealthy, artery-clogging, fattening, cholesterol-raising, heart-attack inducing, constipating, tumor-producing food that should be avoided like the plague, and that a plant-based diet is the holy grail of health.
To the best of my knowledge, the world has yet to produce a civilization which has eaten a vegan diet from childhood through death, whereas there are numerous examples throughout recorded history of people from a variety of cultural, ethnic and geographical backgrounds who have lived on mainly-meat diets for decades, lifetimes, generations. What exactly did these carnivorous cultures eat, and how healthy or unhealthy were they?
https://www.diagnosisdiet.com/full-article/all-meat-dietsOpen linkView original on hackertalks.comCancer is a mitochondrial metabolic disease driven by impaired respiration and compensatory glucose/glutamine fermentation, not primarily nuclear mutations. Management centers on press-pulse metabolic therapy: lowering glucose and glutamine, raising ketones, and combining diet, fasting, hyperbaric oxygen, and targeted drug pulses.
A presentation by Professor Thomas Seyfried recorded during the March 2026 Grand Rounds of the Australasian Metabolic Health Society
::: spoiler summerizer Mitochondrial origin of cancer
Energy metabolism and tumor growth
Cancer hallmarks from damaged mitochondria
Metabolic management strategy
Preclinical evidence
Human and animal cases
Closing thesis
References
Josie talks about her journey on the carnivore diet. Josie Lieder spent 14 years vegan before developing severe ulcerative colitis, repeated bloody diarrhea, major health decline, and two hospitalizations. After introducing bone broth, then animal foods, then a carnivore diet, her digestion, skin, inflammation, weight stability, satiety, and mental health improved. She now maintains a mostly red-meat carnivore diet, avoids plant-food reintroductions that trigger symptoms
::: spoiler summerizer Early Health Alarm and Vegan Conversion
Fourteen Vegan Years and Illness
Breaking Point and Animal Foods
Identity and Social Response
Current Diet and Routine
Current Commitment and Advice
References
T-bones for breakfast, ground round for lunch, rib eyes for dinner. Does this sound like your dream menu — or your worst nightmare? Is a diet consisting of only animal products a simple, healing way to eat or an overly restrictive regimen that borders on an eating disorder?
A carnivore diet contains animal products only. It is plant-free. In its most extreme form, it includes only meat and water.
Read on to learn more about the zero-carb, carnivore way of eating. And find out the results — positive and negative — I experienced when I tried the diet for 30 days.
https://www.dietdoctor.com/low-carb/carnivoreOpen linkView original on hackertalks.comDr. Ede is a Harvard-trained psychiatrist and a pioneer in nutritional and metabolic psychiatry. With over two decades of clinical experience, she explores how dietary strategies—especially low-carb and ketogenic therapies—can profoundly impact mental health.
In this powerful session, Dr. Ede unpacks the science behind metabolic psychiatry and why it offers real hope for patients and practitioners alike.
::: spoiler summerizer Metabolic psychiatry and brain energy
Clinical evidence and active trials
Clinical use and ketone targets
Q&A applications
References
Mackenzie talks about her journey on the carnivore diet.
::: spoiler summerizer Diagnosis and first exposure to carnivore
Early lupus course and medications
First carnivore attempts
One-year result and recent flare scare
Daily eating and household routine
Family, work, and identity changes
Long-term plan and advice
References
This is a 3 hour 'live stream', with with the skill and ease of a drunk burnout who is barely hanging onto their AV club membership.
It doesn't really get started until 30m. It is fascinating, everyone was operating in good faith.
They did try to do zero carb, but they couldn't quite do it, so they still had 12% carbs every day - so this is a meat based low carb. This works out to about 100g of carbs per day, which probably kept them out of ketosis.
28 days is just about long enough to adapt to a new diet, but the results should only be of interest they would need more time to stabilize.
The vegan stayed vegan, and the carnivore stayed carnivore after.
::: spoiler summerizer Low-carb vs plant-based swap setup
Subjective outcomes
CBC, thyroid, vitamins, methylation
Insulin, hormones, inflammation
Lipids and particle markers
Experiment reading and next design
References
Conventional obesity treatment, based on the First Law of Thermodynamics, assumes that excess body fat gain is driven by overeating, and that all calories are metabolically alike in this regard. Hence, to lose weight one must ultimately eat less and move more. However, this prescription rarely succeeds over the long term, in part because calorie restriction elicits predictable biological responses that oppose ongoing weight loss. The carbohydrate-insulin model posits the opposite causal direction: overeating doesn't drive body fat increase; instead, the process of storing excess fat drives overeating. A diet high in rapidly digestible carbohydrates raises the insulin-to-glucagon ratio, shifting energy partitioning towards storage in adipose, leaving fewer calories for metabolically active and fuel sensing tissues. Consequently, hunger increases, and metabolic rate slows in the body's attempt to conserve energy. A small shift in substrate partitioning though this mechanism could account for the slow but progressive weight gain characteristic of common forms of obesity. From this perspective, the conventional calorie-restricted, low-fat diet amounts to symptomatic treatment, failing to target the underlying predisposition towards excess fat deposition. A dietary strategy to lower insulin secretion may increase the effectiveness of long-term weight management and chronic disease prevention.
Full Paper - https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0211
Some nutrition scientists and much of the public often consider epidemiologic associations of nutritional factors to represent causal effects that can inform public health policy and guidelines. However, the emerging picture of nutritional epidemiology is difficult to reconcile with good scientific principles. The field needs radical reform.
In recent updated meta-analyses of prospective cohort studies, almost all foods revealed statistically significant associations with mortality risk.1 Substantial deficiencies of key nutrients (eg, vitamins), extreme overconsumption of food, and obesity from excessive calories may indeed increase mortality risk. However, can small intake differences of specific nutrients, foods, or diet patterns with similar calories causally, markedly, and almost ubiquitously affect survival?
Paper (paywall)- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.11025
Full Paper on Anna's Archive.
When examining the scientific literature on plant-based versus animal-based dietary patterns, we often encounter headlines suggesting clear superiority of one approach over another. However, beneath these seemingly definitive conclusions lies a complex web of methodological limitations, statistical interpretations, and research constraints that warrant closer examination. Interestingly a recent video on YouTube used the ‘study’ to recommend swapping to eating more nuts but they did not disclose that much of the research was funded by the California Walnut Commission. They also did not make clear that the food swaps did not actually happen and that it was all theory. [More continued in article]
https://theukcarnivore.substack.com/p/the-nuance-behind-plant-vs-animal
If you prefer to listen to the audio version of this article - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbp9kOpWFrE
https://theukcarnivore.substack.com/p/the-nuance-behind-plant-vs-animalOpen linkView original on hackertalks.comScience thrives on questioning
Science is not a fixed set of truths; it is a process of continuous inquiry. Every landmark shift in medicine, from handwashing to randomized controlled clinical trials, began with someone daring to challenge accepted wisdom.
https://thenoakesfoundation.org/questioning-the-science-is-not-misinformation-its-the-essence-of-progress/Open linkView original on hackertalks.com