Does anyone else miss traditional forums?
I miss traditional message boards. No karma, no sorting algorithms, you just get new topics on top and replies are sorted oldest to newest.
You can have forum threads that go on for decades, but Lemmy's default sorting system quickly sweeps older content away. I'm aware you can mimic the forum format by selecting the "chat" option in a thread and sorting by old, and you can sort posts by "latest comment" which replicates the old-school forum experience pretty well, but nobody does it that way, so the community behaves in the manner facilitated by the default sorting algorithm that prioritizes new content over old but still relevant content.
I also notice that I don't pay attention to usernames on Lemmy (or Reddit back when I was on it). They're just disembodied thoughts floating through the ether. On message boards, I get to know specific users, their personalities and preferences and ups and downs. I notice when certain users don't post for a while and miss them if they're gone for too long.
EDIT: given this is my most upvoted post on here to date I'd say the answer is yes.
Bump..
u just necro'd this post bro
I find it interesting how thread necromancy can be encouraged on some forums but discouraged on others depending on the local culture. On the pro necro side I can see people wanting to maintain and consolidate discussions rather than constantly rehash them. On the anti necro side I can see how necroing a controversial thread could re-ignite a long extinguished flame war.
The other day i necrod a nearly 3 year old forumthread with some new information. A few hours later the person from 3 years ago came back and thanked me because the new information helped them. Sometimes nercomancy is good :)
If old discussions have no value, then the forum is topical and shallow. If old discussions have value then they are deep and go beyond today's thought-pablum.
I just learned a whole terminology and subculture based on this comment alone
I am split on this.
If you allow it, then you get eevblog sort of posts where there are 1000+ comments over 5 years in 50 pages that switch topics so regularly that every 2-5 pages should be entirely seperate posts and reading them because of wanting to find information on the title topic is completely useless.
On the other hand, sometimes an issue will become stale and someone will comment with an update or solution to a problem and get chastised for "necroing" and sometimes their comment with a solution deleted.
Life is a grave... dig it.
Found Macho Man's alt
I'm confused, this post shows as just 20hrs old for me?
It's not to be taken literally - like other posts in the thread, it's just using language and terminology that was common in the late 90s and early 00s when bulletin boards and forums were in their heyday 😊
I understand the language and meaning, I may just be in a whoosh.
Reported.
First.
Mod immediately locks post down
I like this better.
The threaded conversations allow a useful interesting discussion to continue, even after some random person's comment details half the participants.
Yeah. The way forums threaded made things impossible to follow.
Me, following several forums and the topics within: uh
Like, a forum, at least in the default view, is like a waterfall of conversation. This is because every topic is single threaded.
When you have subconversations and quotes that form, the entire conversation history gets bumped along with the reply. It ends up being like... an avalanche of text.
Threading, like we have here, means I don't get barraged by a wall of text if we have a long conversation. Its nested and makes coherent sense, and doesn't overwhelm.
Its a major improvement.
I'd counter that point though, and say 'then you should be/stay on topic' and not forking the discussion into other topics. It's certainly not difficult to create a new topic about a related discussion, and if it interests the original posters then yay, they might join in, but either way you aren't cluttering up the original discussion.
I see forums as more... professional? Whereas layouts like we have here are much more 'lol memes'. The two types serve two different users.
I spent a good chunk of my teen years on forums and it was definitely a direct, 'here is A Thing and I want to discuss A Thing' conversations. Lemmy/reddit comments are like 'I have this one thought of a kinda-tangible idea for A Thing 2' and it's just... It's not 'bad', but it's most definitely scatterbrain thoughts, just shared for other wandering thoughts to collide. Scribbled brainstorming vs careful planning, I guess? I dunno.
Maybe I'm just old. Blah.
Yeah, if you want to chat off-topic take it to AIM.
A/S/L?
14/f/cali, obvs
If youre reading from the top though, you have all the references of what people would be responding to (especially with quotes), and youre reading in order of reply.
I still prefer threaded conversations, but I can recognize the appeal of single thread conversations.
The image board style works well for forums, ala 4chan, but the issue with some of those is mainly the lack of any moderation. I feel like there could be a Fediverse version of image board forums that work really well.
Namely, they should not have anonymous posting/commenting and should have active moderation.
Imo, image boards were pretty peak for memes and generating original content, when there was any semblance of moderation.
Like others I also appreciate threaded comments here.
But for many niches - forums still abound. I regularly participate in four for specific interests.
On the flip side I loathe the attempt to replace forums not with Lemmy/reddit-like tools but with Discord.
Ugh.
Ugh indeed! Discord is an information black hole, where information enters never to be found again by search engines or even its members
I can understand replacing IRC with Discord, but using Discord as a forum is madness
Discord is even more ephemeral than Lemmy/Reddit. Conversations fly by in minutes or seconds. Discord as a specific platform is starting to enshittify as well.
I cannot fathom the popularity of Discord. It's IRC with rich media support - what good is that as a replacement for non-ephemeral communities?
It certainly scales like shit, but Discord has a very smooth text chat/video sharing features that work extremely well for smaller numbers of people. Like for me and a dozen friends it is the perfect social space, but anything bigger than that and I bounce off hard.
It's incredibly simple. No one has to host a server, and it works well enough for everything you might try to use it for. Try to get someone to use something different, like teamspeak, mumble, ventrilo, or the copycats akin to matrix, and you will get endless bitching about some little thing that doesn't get done (usually screen sharing).
It's a chat client, not a community building tool. It's the round peg square hole thing that baffles me.
Ease of use and screen sharing. It's incredibly easy to share your screen with others in the call/room which I haven't seen replicated to the same quality elsewhere.
I have a lot of other issues with discord though, I strongly dislike that people have started to use it as a replacement for traditional forums
It was the forum replacement thing that baffles me.
Oh yeah, Discord isn't a forum replacer at all - it's a Skype/IRC/Chatroom replacer.
Precisely! It's not half bad for that but the way people use it does my head in 😂
Iirc it evolved from Teamspeak to facilitate/coordinate game play
Yes that was my understanding of its original purpose, as a real-time communication service for gaming. It has since been put to broader use but isn't suited to this broader purpose.
Everyone here saying they still exist.
That’s not the point.
The variety and quantity have all been replaced by spaces like Facebook, Youtube, Discord, and Reddit. Heck, I used to help run two gaming phpBB forums and participate in several others. They’re all gone or the groups have moved to Discord or whatever. PhpBB forums were usually run by private individuals, modded by those with shared interest, and subsisted on donations to run if the owner didn’t just pay for it out of pocket. It was still a little bit of the “old internet” where anyone could create their own slice of it for next to nothing.
I miss them because is was a concentration of each niche and there usually wasn’t much competition. No competition for “likes” or whatever. More of a conversation. If you were into something like old tractor restoration (this one still exists as a forum), you could find a wealth of knowledge in text and photo form, videos, if any, are short and generally to the point without deliberate monetization. I absolutely cannot stand YT as a “information” source because of the constant fluff generation to extend the video for adspace and groveling for subscribers. But that’s a whole different rant.
Anyway, yeah…some forums do still exist. Thankfully they’re generally pretty good at what they do. The others have vanished or moved to corporate social media platforms.
Yeah, forums exist but they have a real hard time growing their userbase these days. It's just more deliberate to visit a particular forum's website, then usually click on a subforum, then look at a thread, and then see its contents. Then you might be on page 37 of a thread and people are all discussing that post from page 33. It's slow compared to something like Reddit/Lemmy or Xitter style sites that put the content right in your face without having to look around.
I'm prone to falling for this myself even as I lament forums growing quiet. But I guess the best thing to do is link directly to forum threads from other social media and hope enough users trickle in.
What I REALLY hate is Discord servers replacing forums for things like video game FAQs and it's really hard to find the latest announcement, bug workaround, or whatever without butting into the conversation and asking (you're the 48th person to ask today and people are a little annoyed).
Discord’s format 100% absolutely sucks. It’s like they took one look at how forums normally work and decided to do the exact opposite and mix it with IRC to boot. I almost never use it.
I'm just confused by the notion that discord could replace forums. To me it's always been a messaging service first and foremost. You can have something resembling a forum discussion on some servers, but that's really just allowing users on a specific server to make a channel with a specific subject for live discussion to happen at, it just happens that since it's so niche that people leave messages and come back to it later forum style.
And that's not even to mention how discord's search functionality is garbage, or how anything on a discord server is basically non-existent to search engines.
I love discord but that’s probably because I don’t use it that way. It’s just a casual chat space for me. I would probably go nuts if I tried to use it like a forum substitute.
:-/
It kinda is, though. "I'm here, rather than over there, because I'd rather product content complaining about a lack of a thing than adding to the content of the thing I say I wish I had".
I think its easy to mis-remember the past. But the idea that people on forums weren't competing for attention, or that whole communities weren't competing for degrees of participation, is a product of nostalgia. Jump over to 4chan - a very Old Internet relic - if you don't believe me.
The thing you remember was the fun you had in your younger days doing a thing you were passionate about. And the thing you hate about Social Media is largely the absence of fun.
I'll tell you what was good about the old school forums. Once you got up the right combination of browser add-ons, there were no ads. I go on Instagram now and I'm getting 2-3 ads for any given real post. I'm getting a flood of click-bait "Suggested For You" content I didn't subscribe to or ask for. I'm getting pop-ins and notices and updates and reminders shoved on me. That's what fucking sucks in Web 2.0/3.0 Just a deluge of corporate shit raining on you at every interaction.
But this dogged insistence that the newer model of forum organization - the Reddit or Wikipedia content ranking formula, rather than the traditional Groups organized by Last Update - is somehow ruining the internet... I just don't see it. What I see with the newer model is more images and videos, which would have sunk an old school dial-up powered forum 30 years ago.
And I think what old-heads are really asking for is a community that doesn't use thumbnails/images/videos in the feed. And I'm sympathetic to that. I'm just not nostalgic for fucking WoW forums or SomethingAwful posters or 90s-era content rings. Just like with the modern internet, that era was choked with shitty posters, bot posters, and endless scams. Those things just weren't memorable in the same way as the fun stuff.
When someone says “I miss the old forums” I think they probably know they still exist and are lamenting the lack of the ubiquity of them and not a total disappearance.
As for the rest, yeah. The internet has always been that way. Shitty mods, trolls, whatever.
Yeah, threaded conversations based on replying to comments and sorted by a recency/popularity algo are less usable, in some ways. But the forum format of sorting everything by most recent reply and only being able to append to the end of a conversation has it's own issues. So I don't think one is worse than the other, it's more like the difference between how threading and replies work on email vs. IM, they each have their uses and their drawbacks.
I prefer and always have preferred a vote system like we have here. Forums made paralel conversations impossible to follow, gave a bigger voice to trolls and made finding information in big threads difficult. I absolutely hated the common answer to a question being "search the forum". I already have Jared, the search function is trash and the information is scattered and outdated.
What aspect I do miss is the fact that threads stayed relevant for more than 24hrs. I think a combination of the two systems would work for a forum 2.0, where ranking is based on activity and votes, so a post gets pushed back up in ranking if it's still active and relevant, instead of just taking raw votes and age in considerarion, but also the comments within are grouped in conversations based on who replied to who and can move up and down based on activity and age.
Yeah, I dare anyone to try digging through this thread and still claim afterwards that it's better than branched comments.
Exactly, threads that get new activity should be bumped. Maybe they don't need to be super-visible for people who ignored the thread in the first place, but they could at least go to the top-50 posts.
I think it would be cool if conversations that link to the same URL are all automatically grouped, so that reposts just become bumps with a new context/title.
You can sort posts on Lemmy by "latest comment" which mirrors the bumping method of forums. That's how I do it. My complaint was that people always use the default so the community never grows around the style facilitated by the older forum method. Maybe if individual communities could force a default or at least have a community specific default that could be changed per user that would help.
Cool! Community-specific defaults is actually not a bad idea.
Except vote systems are abused to hell. Dissenting opinions are down voted into oblivion and we end up with the echo chamber.
I spent a lot of time on the ebaumsworld forums in the early 2000s, and it was your classic shitshow. Not a huge amount of traffic, though, so you could have conversations, but you'd leave, and come back the next day, and sometimes you'd have pages of nonsense to read through.
Then, they introduced rep, and it was such a shitshow. Users conspired together to abuse it, because that's how it goes, except now, instead of late night Skype sessions, it's bots, and marketing, and PR.
I guess the problem was and always is, when there's too many people, it ruins things.
This is the thing when people talk about the Fediverse's traffic compared to Reddit. To me it's very much a feature. I don't think trying to get everyone and their dog on the same platform is a particularly good idea!
Yeah. And it's a give and take for sure, because it being dead isn't great either, but there's definitely sometimes too many dicks on the dancefloor.
Forums were cool. They often had their own culture and in-jokes. People would become well-known on the forum. There's a couple names I recognize on here, but it's mostly transient. (On the other hand, I've probably had a vicious argument with someone and then a nice chat with them later, without realizing it was the same person).
Most internet users seem bland, and just congeal onto youtube, discord, twitch, and other nightmares.
Upvote/Downvote/likes is the cancer that ruined it all. Before that one actually had to speak in support or against any given ideas. Now people can assume anything is true/false based on an arbitrary engagement number.
That lead to a lot more back and forth arguments as people had to get in the last word or people chiming in with agreements because that was the only way to see if multiple people agreed.
I like forums for informational discussions that don't have a ton of back and forth. Forums are better for hobbies in my experience.
Upvote-downvote is a great reaction to all the trolls. combined withan algorithm they can surface the good stuff and alert moderators to garbage. Algorithms are wrong in many places, but that is the implementation that is bad not the idea itself
Lemmys culture of downvoting well written things you disagree with is a problem though. So long as nothing is done about that you can't make a good algorithm. idealy you would have the guts to upvote things you disagree with, but at least we need people to stop using downvote to disagree - respond with reason if you disagree.
A well written post that is completely wrong, possibly offensive, and a net negative to the conversation doesn't deserve immunity to down votes just because of how it was written.
A down vote conveys disagreement and if everyone who disagrees responds then there will be complaints of people getting dog piled. Down votes means letting off some steam for some people, sometimes as a counter to a crappy post or comment getting positive votes they don't think it deserves.
There are also a very tiny number of times that I have seen down votes on something that didn't deserve it. Overall the vast, vast majority of votes are up votes even for stuff that doesn't deserve it and a few down votes doesn't ruin anything. The system works extremely well, even if people have a wide variety of thresholds for up voting and down voting.
What else should a downvote be if not for showing disagreement (Factual or sentiment) with a post?
I got downvotes for typos. Yes grammar nazis exist.
I upvote things I disagree with if they contribute to the discourse in some way.
Is entirely too vague and subjective.
It's vague on purpose, what contributes is entirely contextual. It would take a lot to explain in detail and I don't see a reason to spend the time when a high level summary gets the idea across.
They create a similarly big problem though. Every group has a natural tendency towards members increasingly feeling like they are walking on eggshells with ever more precise purity tests, and any dissent gets hidden.
Well written is subjective. Something can be long and filled with evidence and still be gibberish or in bad faith.
You also have to have a limit of how much effort you are willing to spend in any given conflict.
Furthermore, trying to change human behaviour in that way rather than finding a system that better accomplishes the goal seems like an impossible goal.
You're thinking moderators.
If only we had a system where anyone could report anyone... Maybe have a link that says 'report'... And we could have it on every topic, and every reply, so it would be easy to do... And after a number of reports by users of sufficient account age and in good standing, the reported comment would be moved to a quarantine so if the admins are unavailable, the forum can operate on autopilot to keep the users safe...
Ah well, nobody would ever implement that wild idea... sigh
Moderators universally suuuuuuuuck.
I remember a couple forums had a "thank" feature or something similar that would show, with your username, your approval for a post without having to make an additional post about it. No downvotes though, you had to speak up to be a hater. I think that was a fine middle ground.
Yes, I also think the voting system can make things worse in some ways. On a traditional forum the one and only way to show you like or dislike something was to leave a reply. With a voting system a lot of the "engagement" is just a number that moves up or down. It's also way too easy to slip into the unhealthy mindset of mining karma because monkey brain like number go up. Granted on Lemmy it's a bit better since you don't have a single cumulative score.
Id argue nested comments are equally as bad as voting. Nesting comments just encourages bickering without any breaks in the chain at all and allow you to attack or even dogpile one specific person and comment instead of having to make your own point on your own comment and see if that has any conversarional merit other than tearing down someone else.
It absolutely does. Your post gets hidden, and you have a higher likelyhood of moderator interaction. It is less punishing though.
It does punish you for downvoting, though, and sometimes even upvoting. Just by upvoting what you like or think is important and downvoting what you think is bullshit on All, you can collect quite a few bans. Which is bullshit IMO.
Unrelated but does anyone know how to fix my gpu drivers?
Never responds again
I fixed it!
never responds again, especially if it's a issue no one know the answer for
I fixed it here is a screenshot with the instructions (which is on a external file hoster)
Picture can't be displayed because it has reached the maximum view count.
I used to mod for a forum. I would not do that again.
Also, isn't this interface just forum+?
I used to be a forum admin. My God.
Still miss forums, though.
I miss forum signatures. The best you can usually get these days is a tiny little piece of flair. It would be fun if Lemmy or something supported forum signatures, though I suppose the moderation for that could be annoying.
I just really liked that level of expression.
I miss them too. I used to love designing little banners, and choosing the most appropriate quote to communicate my teenage angst.
Couldn't agree more. I don't miss getting information from forums. A voting system for posts and comments makes it easier to filter out the bullshit and get straight to the answers. It also encourages people to make more helpful replies so that they get upvoted. Definitely don't miss the days of going through pages and pages of dumb, pointless replies, just to get to the one comment with the helpful response.
What I miss is the same thing you do: the fun part of forums. The signatures, avatars, ranks and titles. The sense of community, because everyone knows each other and they all post regularly. You don't get the same sense of community on a social media platform like Lemmy. Just strangers sharing their opinions and nobody remembers anyone.
Signatures were so silly but fun. I doubt you could do something similar today. Too many people are so cynical and would dismiss it as stupid. Back then you could be more silly on the internet without immediate backlash of people putting you down.
Animated signature banners were fun
I always hated the UX of forums. It was incredibly difficult to follow long threads with loads of pages. Personally I prefer the format we have here on Lemmy where comments are nested off the main post.
Yes, for one particular reason: I've always favored longer, slower posting - structured responses to earlier posts with multiple paragraphs to propose a point, explain, and support it. Including the ability to quote / link back to multiple different posts in a thread if needed. The... for lack of a better way to put it, "Reddit-esque" style of branched comments to a post (which includes Lemmy) is nice because it allows multiple parallel discussions rather than one dominating one, but it also seems to discourage longer, more in-depth responses. It also means that interesting ongoing discussions which I'd love to get into can get buried down later in the comments.
Like OP, I recognize that there's nothing actually stopping me from doing this on Lemmy. There's chat and sort-by-new, and of course I can link as many other comments as I want. But the overwhelming trend is towards shorter, snappier answers before you move on to the next comment chain or post; discussions rarely last more than a few hours, whereas forum threads used to be able to keep them going for days.
Yes, this format is quicker. It's quick responses to quick topics, and you don't get the in depth ongoing conversations. Back in the day you used to get really interesting, ongoing debates, I've not seen one of those ONCE in this format.
While I miss forums and "old internet" in general, reddit-style threads is a zillion times better.
I think what people actually miss is pre-corporate, pre-botted internet, where everything felt more real, personal, and insightful.
Good point. Ads weren't anything like as constant as they are now, everything was less commercial and more authentic. I do miss the format as well, but I'd forgo the format if I could lose the constant problems
The absolute pain of opening an old forum thread with an exact solution/guide and all of the images are long gone.
Of course asking for the same solution on reddit will get you a 300 long chain of useless comments.
Photobucket image not found 🚫
I miss the individuality of the old internet. Websites, communities, and users being themselves.
ShitNugget9000 on one forum might be SirReginald79 on another.
Policies set for the community, not the leaseholder.
The internet controlled by a hegemony sucks.
Absolutely agree. I don't think anything I've said or done online is particularly damning, but it's not what I think that matters. It's about what people think 15 years from now when I'm running for mayor or interviewing for a new job. I also know in real life you talk and act in different ways depending on who you're with. I use different vocabulary at work vs when I'm on Discord with my friends vs when I'm talking to parents or siblings. Having a single monolithic entity hosting all possible content, heaven forbid associated with your real name, makes anonymity impossible.
you can do that here too.
No you can't. Only the top level comments are sorted, not the nested ones.
I'm using Thunder (android app) and the sorting does apply to nested comments
"I know"
And I point that out in the OP, but my point is it's not the default so the community culture doesn't encourage long term discussion. I've tried making a single megathread for all my content on a particular community but it never went anywhere because, to everyone else who wasn't sorting posts and comments as described above, the post just dropped off the front page after a day or two never to be seen again.
think of it this way: your post would drop off eventually no matter what. But if you write a great post, it will be seen by far more people than would have normally seen it.
hmmm I hadn't thought of avatars and sigs being part of it but you have a point. Did Reddit even have Avatars before they started pushing their profile pic customizer thing? Even then they're pretty small, likewise on Lemmy, so there's not much room for personality, and as can be seen here a lot of people just don't bother.
That forum structure worked for nice forums with like a hundred active users, it doesn't work when it's tens of thousands of people. I mean I miss old time BBS forums, for what it's worth, but the "reddit style" system is much better in my opinion.
Nested comments aren't the problem, at least I don't think they are. It's how posts/topics are sorted by default that creates a strong bias toward recent content, rather than older content that is still active.
I think there are pros and cons to both nested and unnested systems. With a nested comment structure you pretty much can't have a single comment that replies to multiple upper comments, you can only reply to one comment at a time. But nested comments allow for branching conversations that don't derail the main topic.
I feel like forums sucked too because of the lack of sorting.
They just don't scale well to many users. Once you hit a certain number of users, without some method to sort, its just information overload.
Hell, forum threads that are too long inevitably go completely off the rails and become off topic troves.
I think there has to be a better intermediate format, like perhaps a mix of systems, but I think the main thing that makes reddit-likes suck, is their systems of governance.
Something I realized very quickly with lemmy for instance, is that its the not at all benevolent dictator positions that are the big problem. The main incentives for people choosing to spend their time in mod positions still remains to impose their will, whether that be their opinion or power over others speech.
There is something at its core which is wrong with this system at scale. It allows for mods to collect up critical masses of people before then knowing that due to that critical mass they have captive audiences where there is high friction to leave or start something else.
Lemmy has a very bandaid "solution" for this in that there can be multiple of any given community/subreddit, but they all suffer from the fact that whatever a moderator wants is what happens, and even in the worst case scenarios, that is just moved up one layer to admins, who are incentived to appear as hands off as possible on moderators, lest they get turned on by the people who "help" them.
Reddit sucks because of a lot of other profit driven reasons, but I think this is the main structural problem and lemmy shares in this.
Forums have this problem too by the way, but its just that forums are so separate and so bad at handling massive amounts of casual users, that they run into this far less.
I miss the community. I was a member of a community forum for about 18 years. You knew everyone and it was generally nice.
I miss the annonimity of them, and the lack of robots crawling them
I definitely miss being able to search the internet for helpful forum posts. The fact that most things are on discord now and not internet searchable is extremely annoying and only going to get worse.
No. I feel like reddit/lemmy is a good progression for forums, and I absolutely hate discord when used for technical stuff
I still use some forums like xda-developers and I don't enjoy it as much a I did 10-15 years ago
I absolutely do. I've often dreamed of setting up a forum for my immediate friend group but I don't think the idea would get a lot of traction.
I miss them so badly
This is such a disappointing alternative
It seems a lot of people feel that way. Enough people to revive forum usage, I believe - we should put our heads together in places like https://lemmy.world/c/forums and promote forum usage, as well as shared different forums we've been posting on
They’re still alive and kicking.
But search engines try to steer you away instead of help you find them.
Any good ones? Was sad to see NeoGAF kicked the bucket
knockout.chat is great but small.
You guys are missing out on my badass image signatures.
I had a ton of great ones back in the day on fbody.com (if you're not a car person, it's not what you think.)
They still exist, they're just kind of rare. There's even federated forums like NodeBB. I actively read stuff on SpaceBattles, Sufficient Velocity, etc. It's admittedly difficult to find something with absolutely no like/karma system, but for instance the hellhole known as GameFAQs still exists.
Yeah, sure, but a number of them still exist. They're just mostly reliant on word of mouth now (or using something other than Google). There's some old Star Wars forums that seem to still be surviving, for example.
Oh GameFAQs! That was my first foray into the forum experience along with Gaia Online around 2003 or so. I've hung out on other forums that are sadly now defunct. If anyone remembers the first big cloud gaming service OnLive, I bought into the ecosystem for the few months it was relevant, and found a really fun fan forum that to this day exemplifies my platonic ideal of the message board. It was just a bunch of fans coming together to talk about the thing they loved. I also hung out on the Minecraft forum for a while. That one's still up but I don't think it's very active now surprisingly given the enduring popularity of the game.
For now I mostly hang out on a couple conlanging/worldbuilding forums using phpBB.
Personally I think that this Reddit style is an upgrade design wise. And as far as recognising people goes, I'm using an app that lets you tag users (Summit) and this has gone quite a long way. It's also made the start paying attention to other usernames to an extent, so if I notice that someone often posts content that vibes with me or whatever, I can give them a ⭐ or something.
What I do miss from the days when forums were dominant is that people stayed in their lanes a little more. A particular forum or board or even thread is for a particular topic, and people who derailed or came along just to insult and shit on everything were dealt with, without this crying about 'free speech'.
Current day social media has spawned a bunch of people who feel entitled to say whatever they want to whoever they want in any space they want, and cry about blue haired SJWs or something if there's consequences. And they act like the internet used to be this place where forum moderators didn't rule with an iron fist, or like the 'real world' is somewhere that you can behave this way without being punched in the face.
I just think a lot of problems could be solved if jocks went back to discussing sportsball and cars and stayed in their lanes, instead of considering themselves to be experts on biology and sociology and vaccines. There's a fine line between 'free speech' and letting the inmates run the asylum, and the last 10 years have proven that.
Basically what I miss from the forum days is that back then, the conspiracy theorist idiots would've probably been banned, and would've stayed in the fringes of society instead of going mainstream.
Block them. Why do you need someone or something else to do this work for you? Curate your feed. If you arent seeing what you like... thats a you problem.
Lmao way to turn that on me, good one. I'm literally talking about the people who can't just scroll past or block something without needing to act like it was forced on them. The people who campaign to cancel Netflix over 1 show out of 1000s that they could've just scrolled past. The people who live in an era where you can follow exactly what you want online, and watch and listen to exactly what you want on streaming, but still complain about having the wOkE aGeNdA shoved down their throats because they're incapable of wiping their asses (or they think it's gay).
Trust me, I'm not the one with the problem of inserting my business everywhere that I don't belong. I'm not going anywhere near incel forums, or manosphere support groups, or to tell people how fucking stupid their hobbies are. And knowing these people, I'd get banned quickly if I did because they're the biggest pearl clutchers of all. This problem is entirely one sided and caused by certain types of people who are more emboldened than ever these days.
I hate the notion that fringe lunatics have opinions that are just as valuable as anyone else's. Push that fucking Overton Window back to somewhere sane. We do need people shutting these disruptive idiots down. The answer is not just to act like they're not there.
Has that approach worked on any bully ever?
If someone shows up at a party and starts shit the answer isn't to expect the other partygoers to put in earplugs.
I like forums, but maybe I'm part of the problem. I've read a forum obsessively for years without registering an account. Even when I have an account, I rarely post/comment. I've been reading Lemmy almost daily for over a year before registering an account and don't reply much even with an account. Decentralization starts with individuals, so I'm going to try to add signal to the fediverse.
I generally prefer the traditional flat forum UI with oldest first, but that's mostly a client issue. The problem though is if others are using a different UI the conversation may flow differently (think threaded vs flat forums).
RE karma, a lot of forums show post counts and like counts next to their forum profile, which is often included in every reply, so in some ways, the likes (karma) was a little more in your face. I think there was less astro turfing due to scope of benefit. What I mean is that while traditional forums were decentralized, so was the account and its reputation, so karma (like/post count) farming was isolated to that specific forum/community and if you were astro turfing, you'd get banned and lose that and could not transsfer that to other forums. Services like reddit effectively make this transferrable between forums. I'm concerned about how this will play out as decentralized platforms grow. It could be worse than reddit. I've been trying to come up with ways to handle this, but I can find flaws in every idea I've had so far.
Yes, that's exactly what I mean. You CAN recreate the message board experience on Lemmy pretty faithfully by sorting posts by latest comment (like the bumping system of forums) and setting comments to "chat" which flattens the comment tree, and sorting oldest to newest, but nobody does that so the community doesn't develop around it.
Get on some Linux forums.
Do we have a list of not death forums in 2025, I have been eyeing the following (Spanish forums) and even logged in again!
Emudesc.com Elotrolado.net Forosdz.club
As I only frequented forums as a kid and I didn't know the English language back then, Spanish forums is the only sweet memory that I have, but now I can be part of English forums too, the sad part is they are no longer mainstream 😅
There's a big Italian eMule piracy forum, I don't know if it's a good idea to link it here, but it starts with dd and ends with unlimited. It's based on old-school PhpBB.
Speaking of piracy, another Italian forum is MIR followed by "crew", they share torrents over there.
If you can manage the language barrier, there's a lot of good content over there (usually with double language: Italian + original).
I'm not sure if this is a Lemmy-wide thing or if it's just because I use the Connect app, but I can add User Notes that function as a little tag next to people's usernames. Since I started doing that I've noticed just how small Lemmy is, or at least how few people actually are posting content.
Most of my notes are just to let me know not to bother getting into arguments with them on stuff. Conservative trolls, tankies, AI slop enthusiasts,, people who steal content from others, etc. But occasionally I'll mark someone down as a notable quality poster.
Gimme a good tag and I promise I'll always upvote you and support your views comrade 🤝
I wish there was a way to sync those comments between apps and devices.
I remember back in 2007,2008 etc I had an app on my phone that had tons of forums on it. I spent years on that app reading, learning, screen shorting, so much information. It was my favorite app. Few years later I get a new phone and can’t find that app anymore. There was a woodworking forum, electricians forum, welding forum, weed forum, and so many others. All in one single app.
Couldn’t find any of the forums. Depressing.
I'm probably wrong, but the first app that comes to mind is Tapatalk
That might be the same app I used, but I think it was a different name back then. Maybe that’s why I couldn’t find it.
Depending on the topics, Whirlpool is still pretty active: https://forums.whirlpool.net.au/
Lmao I totally thought it was a forum of hot tub enthusiasts.
If you spend enough time and effort in selected communities on Lemmy you can get a similar experience.
And of course the necro-haters when you reply to something that is older than a week. So the spirit of old times is still there.
I miss them, too. I was a member of a writing forum. There were maybe 30-40 very active members. You'd come to know them even if you didn't know their real names. But you'd read from Flower123 in one post and then there was always a category for smalltalk and you'd recognize Flower123 when they wrote about being sick or their hobby. We even had regional meetings for a big poetry forums where 10/15 came to a café. There was just a feeling of being a community.
Unfortunately I am not sure if this would even work today, even if we replicated the forumstructure 1:1. People are more used to consuming media online. You can see that here in Lemmy, too. Many people complain about the lack of content, but not many post or engage. People want to consume, not take an active role in a community. The only reason reddit still kind of works, apart from the bot content, is that it has a giant, international user base so it still feels like a lot of content even if only 10% are very active.
The whole internet culture has shifted from a light-hearted playground to a consumption-based minefield. People use the internet for different reasons. It's a huge difference if I come home from school, ask my parents to use the internet for an hour, go on that one poetry forum that is 80% of my internet activities and interact with the same 30-40 people every day or if I have the internet with me every second of the day and have an endless supply of consumable content that is enjoyable without interacting. People don't really feel like they can/should be an active participant in the discourse anymore unless it's by posting their own, standalone content on platforms like tiktok. And then it's not really an interaction with other people, it's more like everybody is yelling into nothingness.
I still use them, because they're awesome.
They're not gone, although there are quite a bit fewer than some time ago.
The people demands names !
We Australians are blessed to have Whirlpool. They've been around for nearly three decades and are still thriving.
The forums have diversified a bit from just broadband reviews too.
What about https://www.kiaevforums.com/?
As you can see it's a kind of niche forum for EV made by Kia, but there are several of these niche forums.
Most often they're not very crowded, but I like them being more calm than some other places on the internet.
I have some more of these, but they are really only helpful/interesting, if you fit into that niche and in that case you'll find them easily through search engines.
Wake me up when Usenet comes back around.
I still use a few
Same. Lostcity.rs is the best RuneScape forum
I still use a traditional forum, so in that sense I don't miss them, no 😁
Oh so do I, but the consolidation of social media has left forums dying. Now everyone's on Reddit or (maybe not so much now) Facebook.
Yeah, true.
I don't care much about karma (that would be up and downvotes, around here) but I do miss the old forums not being centralized and/or owned by a single entity or authority or, more exactly, not being the only space available no matter who owned it.
This allowed for a lot more divergence of opinions and dissent. There was no such thing with the advent of centralized social media. Which is the reason why I was so happy to jump onboard the fediverse when I heard about it: no more owerpowered centralized/unique owner and censor. Worst thing happening around here, I would still be free to move to another instance, or even create my own. To me, even though I don't think I will ever need it, it's great.
Another thing I miss of back then are blogs. They still exist, but I miss the thriving (and exciting) communities that existed around them, with its engagement(s).
Blogs sometimes allowed for incredibly interesting conversations, between very different persons expressing their various and oftentimes conflicting opinions. It's something I think is badly needed today more than it ever was. Something that would help a lot of us rediscover the true meaning of the word 'discussion' (which is not to agree with one another singing Kumbaya) and would help us re-learn/rediscover the importance of being able to debate with people we disagree with without calling for them to be censored or worse... That neutering logic of the 'either you agree with us/me, or you're out of here' (or, I insist, worse).
That variety (and healthy tension in debating), I miss. It still exists online, but it's rare. It's much simpler to find it offline, irl while having discussions with close friends who are not afraid to speak freely. And inside books... those books whose authors are challenging to read at least. Which sadly means avoiding not all but a large chunk of the contemporary production to focus on long gone writers, classics or not, who trusted/expected their readers to be smart enough to be able to read even the most disturbing ideas without immediately suing them or calling for their cancellation.
Ah, the good old days of the internet. Yes, I miss them. There are still a few around, like the Linux Mint forum, and some other tech-related ones. But it used to be you could find any topic you were interested in and your account and username were specific to it, and they were separate domains (in the normal, non-tech sense of the word). So you might show one aspect of your personality in one forum and a different aspect in a different kind of forum. Just like you would with different friend or acquaintance groups.
I went back to blacksmithforums.com just now, to my surprise, they changed their software. Now I can't find all the posts that I saved about historical researches...
There are still quite many game developers' forums, but what bothers me a little bit is that sometimes the long living ones periodically lost their past.
That's an unfortunate consequence of being a smaller community with fewer hosting resources. The older a forum is, the bigger the backend database hosting all those posts, and the more it will chug running queries.
I really miss the shit-talking forum on one of my old pirate BBS systems. You could just go a post something with the intent of having a mini flame war with someone… blow off steam. Good fun ☺️
I do miss them, but at least Something Awful is still around
gb2gbs
RIP Blizzhackers
I do it that way, at least on posts with a manageable amount of comments where I actually care about the content of the comments (e.g. threads about someone asking how to do something).
Tremendously. Forums give me a social boost, social media and Reddit-alikes don't. As you say - disembodied voices.
I detest the deliberately ephemeral nature of modern platforms.
Yep I had a proper online friendship group and a real community on message boards. It's waayyy better on lemmy than Facebook or reddit but still not quite there
Yeah, I get a bit of it through Mastodon and I've been to a meetup there which was delightful (Jeff Minter bought me fish & chips!). I think a bit more emphasis on user profiles (bigger avatars, signatures, stuff like that) would help a lot.
I've run forums and been part of them. At the moment I don't really have time but I expect I will again in future. I keep using stuff like Lemmy but it just doesn't make my brain happy like forums did.
The asynchronous nature of them helped a great deal. Here I feel like threads have a lifespan of a day or two at most. I don't want to have to engage immediately in order to take part.
I also don't like the whole upvote/downvote thing. I'm good at it but it colours every interaction in a way I find deeply problematic.
Old-school forum with under a hundred people and a couple mods that give a shit is peak but does have problems with stagnation and over-specialization. Casual chat rooms or a -chan style board are a good counterbalance and nobody should exist in only one social space. Reddit et al. is a weird in-between and Discord feels like worse IRC.
Still on a forum for sports
I took a career aptitude test and it told me I should have been a software engineer and idk if that has anything to do with this, but...
Tl;dr: I got high and there's got to be a way to do it in this here vote-time continuum!
On a superficial level, couldn't you get creative with lemmy community settings (using a new sister community) and create only pinned posts/threads (may be subject to mod approval) which are then autosorted by new comments using some scripty pinned post reordering logic? That probably could only apply to a single community though...
The extent of my web design knowledge is limited to fuckin around with myspace html buuut, with more lemmy UI settings, could users elect that certain posts are "forum" worthy? As in, "this is a meme teehee" or "this is a topic worthy of revisiting over a greater period of time" kind of thing. And barring any weird astroturfing, these posts get "pinned" to be revived at the top of the community whenever some reply or top level comment threshold is passed. Inversely, pinned posts could fall away into an archived state after a certain period of no activity, much like the rest of lemmy that's over a week old (whether it's actually no longer active or not).
Getting pinned (hehe) would probably require meeting various straightforward thresholds (like relative or absolute vote value and/or the ratio of upvotes to "pins"). That could determine a sep for how long a post/thread remains subject to revival by reply.
If this configuration were applied to lemmy in general, I think to encourage participation, I'd say it should be an opt-out situation when visiting a specific community (do you want to see community-pinned posts?) and an opt-in situation when choosing to include "active archives" content in a homepage feed.
Not really sure about implementation, but to me it just becomes a secondary voting system as a means to value longevity of a topic, and various ways of incorporating those data into user sorts, community pages, and news feeds that might want to utilize.
Simple as that, right?
^heh^
Luckily there are still some interesting forums around for specific topics and old school games!
Visit cyberspace.online
I actually do really like that one. Has a cyber cafe exploring the forums vibe
I miss Livejournal, the original Livejournal where you were able to tell people intimate things about yourselves and make friends for life.
Kinda but in general, I miss when a online community wasn't a walled garden and is open to everyone. I prefer the format of Reddit/Lemmy as I find some forum thread to be difficult to read as there's few different conversation going on.
One of the things I love about forum is that I know that it can be find via online search. Something nice about finding answers from a smaller-niche website that's away from places like Reddit.
And the threads in old forums would just get longer and longer because people replied with quotes, so you'd have to scroll through walls of text of the same replies and quotes just to get to the bottom where some guy replies to all of it with "u r dumb", and then it keeps going from there. It's a bit messy.
I loooooved online debating back in the day you used to really get interesting and diverse conversations, they'd go on for pages and have a range of perspectives. On a good board you'd have well reasoned and well sourced arguments, and really learn a lot. All that's gone and sadly I don't see it coming back
I still mess around in some traditional forums and I do not miss them.
The time bias is much bigger. First comments are usually the only ones people read and replies. If there's a great comment in page 5 no one is going to see it. But if there's a troll comment in page one it is on everyone's faces. Karma system fixed that.
It's true the thing about usernames and avatars. But I prefer not to personalize a lot so for me that's also a plus, I can focus in the comment and not in who has written it.
I was just thinking, the optimal "reddit"-type site should have been just a big list of links to different forums, and nothing more
No, I never liked the interface with all the conversations mixed so you had to copy most of the thread for context just to add half a line.
I always found them tedious and confusing.
I miss dial-up BBSes that had nothing more than a wall of text, like SASSy was in Montreal. Single line system, no user names or logins, 7 bit ASCII, no colors, no sound, no files.
You just kept dialing until you got the line. Then you'd download all the lines from the last line you left off, then either typed in your stuff or pasted it. If you were super lucky, the sysop would barge in while you were typing.
It was great. Really felt like technology and people mixing well, we even eventually met IRL with "GT"s, Get Togethers.
I miss the sense of fun and adventure and my youth. Especially my youth.
I get the nostalgia, but I do like the thread format of modern forums. Sometimes I don't want to wade through subtopics that people are discussing. I'll just collapse the whole thing and focus on what I want to read. I think it's nicer this way.
Bodybuilding forums led to a notorious debate on the number of days in a week. I feel like a reddit format would water down the debate by not presenting replies as they are posted in real time.
I really want the full story
While the original is down the archive has it: https://web.archive.org/web/20150105082427/https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=107926751
Except for the fact that a lot do the "create an account to see the link". Aside from being annoying, encouraging dead accounts is a security risk, not for the forum but for the users.
Yes. I’m still on one or two but they’re definitely diminished. They had a bad habit of degenerating into factionalism, or losing their plurality of viewpoints due to popularist ideological purity purges.
there are still here, but not very prevelant as before. the problem with some is some mods are very uptight and when admonish you or ban at the slightest notion they think your violating some rule. Also other people giving you snide or condescending response might be harder to deal or report against, and sometimes you cant contradict someone who has older account who gatekeeps the subject of that forum. forum post also dont see much traffic either, usually its gets ignored pretty quickly.
I do too, but all the ones I used to visit have gone offline, and whenever I try looking for one on some relevant topic the most recent post is from 2017.
Have the same feeling, I actually thought about making an alternative threadiverse client in the style of phpBB. But I believe there should still be an option to display comments like threads, it is just easier to use I believe. Default should definitely be new though for comments and posts. Its surprising how well threadiverse would be compatible with message boards.
Which also brought up the question with the fediverse being so open how different people interact with it using different clients.
nodeBB is a message board server that has activitypub built in. Not sure what "threadiverse" means though I assume it's something to do with the Reddit-like format of nested comments. I can't remember if you can nest nodeBB comment chains, but it does have a voting system that can be disabled.
I put up a nodeBB server for a while earlier this year. Got cold feet about admin responsibilities. I know how to self-host but seeing a list of people's actual email and knowing I was responsible for keeping it secure scared me away.
Saw people on here calling the mbin, lemmy, piefed part of fediverse "threadiverse" so i have adopted it.
Also saw nodeBB but I didn't really like the style of it. And I believe that we already have the backend set with lemmy, its just a matter of how the data is being presented. 🤔
I like the anonymity, though.
Not OP, but I think forums were separate entities, so you could choose a different username on each one and have disconnected identities.
On Reddit, or even here, you have the same identity for all content you follow. People can easily trace out your profile.
I think the big problem/reason why people feel the need for anonymity is because of what I mention here. Basically, people always feel on pins and needles with regards to shitty moderation.
I actually think further than this, people in power are almost always too blood lusty and immediately jump to permanent bans all the time.
It results in chilling effects that create echo chambers.
Of course what you talk about doesn't help as it serves to make people even more trigger happy as real bad faith threats exist and you can't easily tell intent.
I feel like to have real conversations online, maybe a more ideal hypothetical platform would have any sort of legal binding to follow certain terms, they'd require being connected to a real id without storing said personal information in plain text, and would connect that to specific IDs to completely shut down (meaningfully) the botting, to have people actually talk.
People could then chat as themselves, or anonymously under a username, but there would never be confusion as to whether or not someone was real.
This is very half baked though and I already can think of tons of problems.
People suck. People especially suck when they get even a modicum of power.
You can still create for each topic a different account. One Lemmy account that is subscribed to game communites, another one for local news etc...
Yes, but who actually does that?
I honestly have two accounts, one for SFW content and another one on LemmyNSFW. But it's still a bit annoying to switch accounts.
Sorry, I just saw your reply. I was addressing the thing you said about forums, where people identify frequent posters; their profile picture is big, there is often a signature, a big nickname, etc. I like that we (here on Lemmy and similar sites) do not often read the little nickname above. I'm sure no one or almost no one can say which other comments I have made without going to my profile. There's nothing behind my words but my words: no reputation, no prejudice from an accounts' aesthetic, etc. I mean, my grammar betrays me, and someone might remember me from a previous encounter. But yeah, like I said, I'm like a blob for most people, and that's comfortable.
I was going to end the comment there, but there are so many reasons why I prefer to be a blob, a little text box. First, traumatic experience. Second, when there's a reputation, it starts to weight on how people receive your messages and I hate that people misconstrue me (and I guess I'm easy to caricaturize). Third, no social drama, no social nothing. Peace... ᵃⁿᵈ ᵗʰᵒˢᵉ ᵃʳᵉ ᵗʰᵉ ᵐᵃⁱⁿ ʳᵉᵃˢᵒⁿˢ.
I feel unseen.
I think I recognize your avatar from [email protected] if that makes you feel any better.
You were the first username I recognized on lemmy, and remain the most visible.
Are there forums on Lemmy? I thought it was just memes.
You're in one right now. Lemmy is basically a forum: people can make posts and reply to them. The only difference is the points system.
Like I say in the OP, Lemmy and other Redditlikes have a default post sorting algorithm that prioritizes new posts over old but still active posts. This has a huge impact on the culture of the site. Topics are more ephemeral. Once they drop off the first page nobody will ever see them again.
On a forum, if a person wants to make frequent updates over a long period of time on a single topic, they can make a single megathread that stays visible as long as new replies keep coming. On Lemmy et al. the topic quickly drops off the radar no matter how many people reply, meaning if the OP wants to make frequent updates on a similar topic they have to keep making new posts if they expect people to reply.
Let's say I'm on a car enthusiast forum, for example (IDK anything about cars). And let's say I'm restoring an old car and want to share my progress over the course of months. I can make a single topic about my project and post replies to it with pics and updates about what's going on. As long as I keep updating or as long as people keep commenting on what's already there the topic remains relevant and more importantly visible, and could remain so for years or even decades.
Now let's imagine the same project on a Redditlike site like Lemmy. Yes I can do the same thing as above, make a single post and keep replying to it, and people can chime in with comments. But because the default sorting algorithm causes older posts, no matter how active, to drop off over time, I'll be replying to the void since nobody will see the post. In order to maintain the same level of visibility and interaction, I have to make new posts for each update. It's less likely that my project will become an enduring part of the community's history because it will either get swept away by new content if I use a single topic, or be scattered across several disparate posts.
Other differentiating factors that people have brought up are signatures and avatars. Avatars are really small on these sites and there are no sigs at all. These were modes of self-differentiation on forums, allowing individual users to be more recognizable and allowing connections between users to develop. On Redditlike sites you're just a username and maybe a little icon, making it harder to see anything but disembodied ideas floating in the ether.
Yes I can make Lemmy behave like a forum by sorting posts by latest comment and using the "chat" display option for comments, but nobody else does that so posts will get swept away by new ones for them even if they aren't for me, meaning the culture never grows around this system.
It's not what I would consider a forum. Traditionally forums were built around an interest or topic, Lemmy like Reddit is a conglomerate of communities or subreddits some of which I'd consider forums. Lemmy doesn't have the population to support nitch groups like Reddit does.
Might be handy if Lemmy allowed to hide karma altogether. You could still up-/downvote (depending on the instance, only upvoting allowed). Or places where karma is disabled by default.
Some apps, Mlem is one, allows you to hide scores. You can also remove the up/down vote buttons should you choose.
I definitely miss the sense of community and building relationships that I had in forums. In particular, one forum I was on was a great size, diverse members with a shared interest, but we rarely spoke about the topic except to reference it. The off-topic section was where we spent all out time.
Lemmy/reddit feel more distant. I like it but it's a different medium. There are people here I find so smart and funny, but interactions are akin to striking up a good convo while waiting in line at the store, wishing you were friends with them, but knowing you'll probably never see them again.
It's not like these platforms have been around that long. I hope one day a new platform/medium comes along that fills that need.
Single serving friends. I really don't like it.
No, because they haven't gone anywhere.
Not really. There are so many comments in a single Lemmy thread that continuing it would be a fools errand. Old forum threads were not much better besides often having more direct conversations with people. But I find that to be much better on Lemmy than on Reddit too.
Similarly to forums, Lemmy is small enough that you often recognize usernames and recognize who it is and what they've talked about recently. E.g you might kinda know what's going on in their lives.
Does anybody else miss Compuserve, Delphi, etc?
I can't miss them because I was too young when they were relevant, but I do love the early days of home computing specifically because I was technically alive and aware but not old enough to know what was going on. Anything from the 80s has a surreal dream-like quality for me. I'll hear a random word like "CompuServe" and instantly be transported back to the floor of the living room when I was knee-high to a grasshopper, when I heard the word on a TV commercial or overheard older kids or grownups mention it. Then I'd be like "Oh yeah that really did exist and wasn't just the product of my tiny baby brain." It's also why I like synthwave music and cassette futurism.
I want to write mails for mailinglists again :(
They're still around, even if they don't get as much traffic as they used to.
I miss UUCP style forums. They had threading that worked and the concept of 'i've alread read this so don't show it to me again'. Together those made it easy to see well thought out responses weeks latter.
All other forums are worse. They encourage writing something quick - long well thought writing won't be found because by the time someone gets it down the topic is dead.
though the original trolls were from such forums. It should be no surprise that everyone else has them - they change nothing.
obligatory RIP kongregate
in theory, yes; discussion threads, yes; no for questions and answers. people on modern-style platforms can be assholes, but i have wanted to punch a guy from 2007 more times than i can count.
Not particularly.
There was so much to deal with back then. So many different rule sets to follow, so many differences in each community, so many sign-up and on-boarding processes for posting or contributing each.
I miss the internet itself from that time period, and I realize that there is a certain community feel that is missing due to how congregated the current internet is, but I still don't really miss forums specifically all that much.
Mgl, not paying attention to subreddit names and treating everything like I'm swimming through a sea of floating ideas, when posting, is part of why I'm on Lemmy today. Reddit's sadistic mods didn't like it much.
I love the old school forums. I think folks were nicer in them. However, I just couldn't go back for good simply because the UI is not user friendly, and navigating the sub-forums is like going through the labyrinth. Reddit and Lemmy are better due to better UI.
Yes.
Forums have their place. They're the place if you want to talk to experts who will shit on you for not being an expert, get ignored, or get actual help a few days later if you're lucky.
Get the Discourse app and find a forum you like. Or start your own. It’s cheap, I’m spending less than 2 coffees a month to host one.
I actually tried this, with nodeBB rather than Discourse. Thing is I don't trust myself to secure people's PII, and I was kind of stepping on the toes of an already established community that I'm a part of and had no intention of fracturing. I just didn't like (and still don't tbh) their use of phpBB. I want to be able to use markdown instead of bbcode and I want a user mention feature. But the forum is the people, not the platform.