AI isn't alive. It's fancy if/else.

I build LLM models for a living, if you need my source

Fuck, this his hard. As a father of a gay child, and a trans child, our immediate plans are passports.

All you rich people who think you can break any law you want, let this be a warning roadmap

Jury nullification is an important logical conclusion of American jurist rules. This post will stay up.

My single favorite report was on this one.

Misleading title, it's not clear this is a parody post.

For those that don't know, it's a parody.

Comment was reported for

Misinformation and genocide denial

I'm leaving this up.

Rule 4: Shitposts and memes are allowed

This post stays up.

You incorrectly assume I'm intelligent.

Foreigners won't travel for tourism when they face imprisonment for traveling here? Who would have thunk?

Reported for:

Not a meme.

Yes it is.

I make ~$200K a year. As a father of 5, I wish I had not had a single one. I love them, but the stress of taking care of them coupled with the future of the planet makes me regret life choices.

Do you have any of the accounts doing the harassment? If you would, DM me those that you have, and I'll personally look into it, and reach out to instance admins with my findings.

My dad - who was an amazingly racist conspiracy theorist - gave all his money to 2 redhead women he started fucking after divorcing the woman he married after my mom died.

He chose not to leave me anything because I called him out for using the "n" word any time he talked about African Americans.

I'm out $150k

He is out having a legacy. My kids will never know his name, story, or hate.

sigh

The Nazis were not the first fascists. Italy was. There's been many since. Being fascists doesn't mean being a Nazi. Being a Nazi DOES mean you are a fascist. Not all hot tubs are Jacuzzi, but all Jacuzzis are hot tubs.

It's been said (paraphrasing) "Trying to define a fascist is like trying to nail jelly to a wall". This is because there are many distinct forms of fascism, but they do share some similarities.

As Jason Stanley said to define fascism at its core:

A cult of the leader who promises national restoration in the face of humiliation brought on by supposed communists, Marxists and minorities and immigrants who are supposedly posing a threat to the character and the history of a nation ... The leader proposes that only he can solve it and all of his political opponents are enemies or traitors.

Sound familiar?

Let's break down that definition:

1. A cult of the leader - MAGA, anybody?
2. ...who promises national restoration... - Literally what the letters in MAGA represent: "Make America Great Again"
3. ...in the face of humiliation brought on by supposed communists, Marxists and minorities and immigrants who are supposedly posing a threat to the character and the history of a nation ... - His attack on China. His attack on the idea of anti fascism. His attack on immigrants and RAMP UP on ICE and use of the military in democrat-led states
4. The leader proposes that only he can solve it and all of his political opponents are enemies or traitors. - This is literally his talking points every day.

I challenge you to prove otherwise.

This is why you were banned from politicalmemes.

Because there's not one definitive definition, and proving without a doubt someone shares ideals is almost impossible, you want to point at a vague idea and say "see, there's no way he's fascist!"

Now, it's time for me to be an adult and do my actual job. This is just volunteer work.

Post was reported for

troll/not unpopular

Seems like the picture was shitposting, but that's allowed. The post? I don't think it's trolling.

Leaving up.

This post has been reported as

Not relevant

It's an opinion. I'd hazard a guess it's unpopular. I see nothing wrong with this.

leaving it up.

The estate should file the claim. They wronged her, not the husband. By having the estate file suit, that would negate anything the husband may have done.

This is a rare exception to rule 6. Yes it's a video, but it does qualify as news.

I wonder if this will be the end of school mascots in Oklahoma

Compelling speech is a violation of the first amendment.

Yeah, I wish they could force it, but they can't. They might be able to come to an agreement between both parties that if the defendant did XYZ, the plaintiff would reduce damages by X amount.

I don't see that happening, though.