People angry that Superman represents kindness are outright admitting that they don't want to be good people
How is kindness a bad thing? I thought that was universally agreed to be a good message to have in a piece of media. I guess the excuse is they don't want media to have messages at all but like, how would you even have a movie where the hero has no values that they stand for?
989
Comments208
Superman fighting the klan didn't work because adults laughed at their hand signs and shit that were disclosed...
It's because it got a generation of kids to see the klan as the bad guys
If Superman hated you, how the fuck were you going to indoctrinate your kid into the klan?
That's why they're always bitching about media. The people doing it are ignorant, but the ones telling them what to be mad about it are picking logical targets to fufil longterm goals.
It's why fighting fascism is like losing weight, you can't reach a goal and stop giving a fuck, it's a lifestyle.
Can confirm. 330lbs I said "I'll reach 320."
At 320 I said I'll reach 310.
At 310 I said 300.
At 300 I said 290.
Then 280.
Then 270.
Then 260.
Then 250.
Then 240.
I went back up to 250. Oh no no no no no. Fuck that shit. I'm going to see 240. And when I do, it'll set my sights on 230.
And when I see 230, I will hug someone. Because that will be 100lb.
Which means I'll look to 220.
And then 210.
And 200.
I don't know where my weight loss journey ends. I don't know when I'll feel at a healthy weight.
I just know I hope my journey brings me to a day when I get to punch a nazi.
Because nazi lives DON'T matter!
You're gonna do it brudduh, don't stop bettering yourself :)
The last thing you said is why I got one of my bans on Reddit. Fuck Reddit.
The horrible thing about it all is that saying you should always punch Nazis was an uncontroversial statement even as recently as three years ago.
The only reason it's now considered a terroristic threat is because powerful figures have started openly identifying with fascism.
We need to be saying it more, not less.
Well. Your journey took real strength. Ain't that something? Keep fighting the good fight.
I mean Hitler did kill Hitler.
Just don't think of it as a diet or oppressive. Make it a lifestyle. I'm still around 220 after 11 years of mostly stuck in bed. 16 years ago I was 350. A part of me wishes I was still 190 at 7%, but it is super hard for me to get that low. I just don't have that kind of pain tolerance to deal with being light headed and hungry 24/7 while counting calories, eating constantly, but never meals or more than a few bites of dry salad or chicken. Without racing and riding like 400+ miles a week, I'm just not that kind of motivated. I'd much rather be lazy and eat meals with way too many calories at once but still far fewer than most people. I have no desire to binge or eat processed food of any kind any more. Avoiding dairy has also been super helpful too because that is a good excuse to avoid most junk people make, fast food, or restaurants the few chances I ever get.
Send a text when you hit 0!
The only good fascist is the one buried in the earth.
Wait are you saying that Hitler is good?
Well he did do one good thing in his life. He killed Hitler.
Holy shit you're right.
Fighting for freedom never ends.
I completely agree it's like loosing weight, at a certain point it becomes actively harmful.
For all the right wingers who think woke, pro immigrant superman is a new concept, reminder that this is a poster from the 1950s
Interestingly enough zero black people depicted, or any other races but white - just one dude with a dark orange complexion like the Mango Mussolini.
from this article:
Another story from 1953 called “People are People” has a Black youngster holding off an escaped lion until Superman can capture the animal. The owner of the circus the lion has escaped from wants to congratulate a white boy for his (nonexistent) heroism until Superman points out that the heroic young man was Black, and that the circus owner only wanted to congratulate the white boy because he was prejudiced.
Ethnicities. “Race” is a shit expression.
Agreed, but 'ethnicity' means something else, closer to 'national origin' mentioned on the poster. All the white people pictured may well be of different ethnicities, for example. 'Ancestries', perhaps? 'Different skin color'?
Colour palette.
Yeah you got the crux of the problem here! Let‘s correct people that are saying the same with a bit of arrogance to have a dopamine kick and then let’s make a fight about this so we are pushing the other person away
God why everything has to be so divisive these days?!
Interesting article about the history of 'socialist superman' during the depression and the ideological evolution.
Propaganda is powerful. You convince your followers that some classes of people don't deserve kindness, you convince them that everything out of Hollywood is part of a leftist agenda, and once they believe both of those statements it's very easy to spin this as further proof of the narrative they've already bought into.
But what if you kill them with kindness?
Just be sure to make it look like an accident.
Like Bob Ross, just a happy accident.
Feels wrong to hide it.
https://www.local10.com/news/2019/01/14/florida-man-threatens-to-kill-man-with-kindness-uses-machete-named-kindness/
Whatever gets the job done.
I disagree. Every person on this earth deserves happiness, and to avoid suffering. They also deserve kindnesa. That, however, does NOT mean they can do whatever they want. "Hey fascist, you do not get to tell people that kindness is bad" is not an unkind statement. You can have boundaries while still being kind. I really don't believe we're ever going to win the fight against fascism with more hate. Hate breeds hates. Kill them with kinds is a saying for a reason. If you tell a hateful person that you love them in spite of their hate, they don't know what to do. They want people to hurt because they are hurt. If you accept their hurt, they will stop trying to hurt you (disclaimer this isn't always black and white for each individual person, this is a philosophy that applies to humanity)
I'm just baffled because not only is it way easier to not hate people, it's way more beneficial for everyone.
These people are taking two mile hikes to find the perfect deer shit to shove down their throats.
That's fully understood, we're talking about propaganda, and I'm talking about who that propaganda affects.
You're not wrong though at all. Arm yourself, convince anyone you can to do the same.
Only war is class war and I aim to win this bitch
Probably the same idiots who thought Homelander was a hero.
I've been wondering if there are Trump supporters watching The Handmaid's Tale and siding with Gilead
I’m sure they have watched it and made lots of notes.
Yes there are
too many words, not enough explosions
Homelander is a hero, just not to the public.
You didn't even upvote your own comment. That's how stupid it is.
i think he is analyzing how maga thinks not being a maga himself... but i could be wrong.
Conservatives are still mad that Superman fought the kkk.
Which is admitting they side with the kkk, isn't it
Well, yeah. They aren't exactly trying to hide their white supremacist tendencies anymore.
If Superman were real, he 100% would have melted a lot of those racist fucks.
If you haven't, I highly recommend reading "Superman Smashes the Klan." An all-timer, based on a radio story from 1946, which was honestly its own kind of ballsy.
I really don't know how to convince people they should care about others.
I don't know how to teach empathy.
People care about their in-group. Make being human their main identity.
we can purge those filthy xenos from the galaxy!
Captain Archer had some good ideas. Turns out he really doesn't like bullies.
A few slaps on the butt (assisted by a carpet beater when the occasion demands it) will usually do it. At least that's how my mom did it with us.
"You! Have! To be! Good! To! Your! Sister/neighbor/dog!"
(EDIT: /s if not clear)
By exercising it at a young age in public schools.
And judging those without more harshly.
If you can't learn empathy, learn to spite the enemies of empathy
There's an underlying care instinct that needs to be activated. Its emotional; you can't explain it, they have to experience it.. There was a post years ago supposedly describing the empathic awakening of a white supremacist, which occurred as he was waiting to harm or harass a father and son on a bus, and the moment of awakening happened as he witnessed the father expressing his love for his son and something clicked for him, probably because he wanted that sort of affection from his dad and never got it.
That's the thing, isn't it? You either have empathy, or you are the other species. The one that can't comprehend that there is anything wrong with them, but the world would be better off without them.
Well, I have neither empathy or sympathy for those anymore. They dehumanized me first, after all.
I am absolutely with you.
Also people should learn the difference between empathy and sympathy, the latter not as fatiguing and difficult to develop and often more useful.
Empathy can be developed over time by MOST people.
Also, performative empathy can be developed.
But then ALSO, anti empathy seems to be developing in society? Which is wild.
Oh fuck off would ya? Every time I test my empathy, I am basically shown to be simply unemphatetic. Doesn't make me a monster - simply instead of feeling something is wrong, I have to think shit through.
And trust me, it's even easier that way. Would I like someone to kick me? Maim me? Deport me? Does the net good outweight both the general consequence and the consequence for the other party? No? Then don't fucking do it. Whether I like other party doesn't take part in the process, which isn't true for empathy.
I like the Nathan Fillion comment during some red carpet interview when the interviewer was trying to egg him into saying something that would get rage clicks from one side or the other of the current political trash fire.
"its just a movie guys"
Superman was not a brooding edge lord until Snyder's take outside of specific story runs, and it is obvious that a lot of people don't know that.
Captain Hammer best superhero, who's with me on this
I so want a sequel to the sing along blog.
Dr Horrible has become obsessed with reviving Penny by turning back time. He doesn't care how many people need to die, because he believes he can "fix" things. But the risk of time travel is the destruction of the universe...
Captain Hammer, now knowing what pain is, has two choices, grow and overcome the pain, or continue to hide away...
And Penny. The multiple zombies, and clones, and computer simulations of Penny that were never "right". Well, she too has her parts to play.
That plot was already made by marvel, almost to a T
love it, but it won't happen.
Dr Horrible was released 17 years ago.
They don't have a movie but they have a show. Homelander is the perfect 'hero' for these people. Only even the dullest dullard in the magat pile fails to recognize the character is evil but they never consider they are the baddies. Edit: fixed spell check.
Highlander? I am not making the connection.
I fixed it. It was supposed to be Homelander.
There can be only one!
(I don't get it either. Maybe they're thinking of The Boys, with the character Homelander?)
They confirmed it was an error and indeed meant homelander—you were right. They corrected it. FYI.
Highlander being a hero for the conservatives is an interesting thought experiment though hahaha
If we're giving them all claymores and letting them have at it it seems okay to me.
Do these people exist? Is it just one troll, or a significant enough of a population to even give the slightest bit of thought?
Look at how many Americans would voluntarily die themselves just to prevent "unworthy" people from getting free health care.
These people exist.
Pain is the point for them
I frequent dive bars. I have met plenty of people who believe in kindness, and love, and Jesus and shit - but not for immigrants, not for non-white people, not for criminals of any level. I straight up have had these people say this to my non-white face and then say, "oh but you don't count because you have a job" or "you don't count because you aren't a drug addict". Etc. etc.
These people suck fucking dick and I want them all to die.
It's fucking ironic too when these same people talk about smoking weed, or stealing from big box stores self-checkouts, or vandalizing some dude's car.
"Rules for thee, not for me."
I read local obituaries solely to celebrate when I see some of these people die.
This is dark, but you fuckin do you gurl. Fuck em.
If only the circumstances that spawned them would change too...
I've met countless people who hate morals and will tell you you're an idiot if you treat other humans as equals
No way
Business school and working at large corps. You inevitably meet a lot of those trump and tate wannabes
yes way. I have seen it with my own father. And the saddest part is they got this from religious rightwing media and have never ever interacted or had an opportunity to interact with the out-group that they are told to fear. Oh and, I am not from the 1st world. This shit is everywhere.
humans are just resources to expend and exploit.
It's one guy making the propaganda right now, but I assure you, in a week, everyone in your family that you try not to talk to will be spouting this horseshit.
Cause Americans are obsessed with Rugged Individualism.
If you are in trouble, you don't accept help, much less ask for it. You pull yourself up by your bootstraps and turn your fortunes around with grit and determination using nothing more than the loose change in your pocket.
Thats how anyone that needs help became nothing more than social parasites leeching off the rugged individualistic success of their betters.
Thats why Americans, on the whole, have all but erased empathy and good will towards others.
Its why 1/3rd of the country actively votes for weak, pathetic fascists who poorly playact as strongmen. Its why 1/3rd of the country didnt bother voting, because they have no problem with fasciatic strongmen punishing the weak and the other.
The New Religion of the American Orthodoxy is basically "Fuck you, Got Mine".
You're reciting history through rose colored glasses. The whole American dream has been to come here get some land of your own and go do your own thing.
I don't want to livelihood we've been adapted". We were adapted to run through grass from tree group to tree group while avoiding large predators. Dying horrible and often gruesome deaths. Or slowly withering away in pain thanks to a simple infection. Society can not exist in the way that we evolved. Again. Rose colored glasses.
I’m curious how this movie is, I’m used to the older ones and a show called Smallvile.
I did not know there was some anger about this Superman movie. Anyone could quick give me a small summary?
Though bit bummed out that they keep remaking movies and shows instead of making new ones.
James Gunn commented that Superman is an immigrant, and conservatives are losing their minds
People on Facebook are telling me he isn't an immigrant, he's from outer space. I'm so confused as to what they think an immigrant is
Literally an illegal alien, and they refuse to see it.
The most illegal alien. Smallville had an episode where Clark helped hide an undocumented migrant. His mom tried to chastise him and he had to remind her his own paperwork is shady as hell.
illegal space alien.
So no Englishman from New York?
Does he like his toast done on one side..?
No no no, you see he's white! /s
"Strange visitor from another planet" is one of the first things most people learn about him, right after him being neither a bird nor a plane.
"he can't be! He isn't brown!"
Apparently there is a black version of Superman in some comics and they were making a movie of him. Sadly, the movie has been cancelled.
To be fair, the cancelled movie would have been with Will Smith. I'm ok being without a Will Smith Superman movie. Steel did get his own movie, but without any Superman IP in it.
They already made a Will Smith Superman movie. He was a drunk hobo version of Superman.
oh yeah. It was ok.
But that's nothing new. In Smallville there is one episode in which Clark literally said to his mother Martha that he is an illegal alien too.
That’s all? That’s why they’re upset? Sigh, it’s as if someone accidentally farts and then they rage.
Isn’t he kinda right though? If I remember well, Superman came from another planet.
There are two plausible explanations:
People think immigrant refers to a person who chose to move. Since Superman didn't arrive on Earth by choice, he's not an immigrant. This is, of course, incorrect.
People think the term immigrant only refers to people who look "different" compared to what is common in the region. This is, of course, racist.
If they're okay with immigrants who didn't come by choice, then all the children who were brought to America illegally by their parents should be allowed to stay and everyone born in America should be allowed to stay citizens.
As for Superman not looking like an immigrant, it is actually a big coincidence in-universe that he happens to look like a white human. There's no Europe on Krypton.
Now I want an alternate-universe Superman who happens to be black, and lands in racist-as-hell-ville in the rural USA.
he would be a refugee.
Refugees are a type of immigrant though.
He also said that Superman is kind, and that bothered them too.
This movie won me over when I saw Krypto and the fortress Bots. That’s the kind of stuff I’ve always wanted, but then idiots like Bryan Singer and Christopher Nolan (who clearly hate and are embarrassed by the source material) show up and want to make everything dark and “realistic” so characters like krypto don’t make it to the movies. Fuck realism, im watching a movie about a super alien fighting monsters, i don’t want realism in my comic book movies
I don't think Christopher Nolan was embarrassed by Batman and he only made a standalone trilogy. If he was embarrassed by Batman, he wouldn't have included an homage to Adam West Batman.
Singer and Synder are just edgelords. You can find them at any comic book store arguing about something stupid, but tolerated longer then they should be because they spend the most money.
On the Synder track, 300 is just a really uncomfortable movie. It’s a propaganda movie for a hell-state.
Isn't that like the point? The whole movie is visualization of the propaganda speech that the narrator (Dilios) is making before the battle of Plataea.
Did anyone walk away from that movie thinking “this is an unreliable narrator story and we shouldn’t take the fash-y elements at face value” or was it “damn the Spartans were bad ass”?
I thought it was weird that the "Heroes" threw deformed babies off a cliff and then when one of the deformed babies who survived, took the opportunity to betray the Spartans. What did Miller and Snyder mean by that?
The infanticide was historically accurate - although probably at a scale less than the movie implies. But it is in sources.
But yeah - the way that the film portrays the treatment of disabled people is especially gross. Pay attention to who is in the court of Xerxes - the acceptance of disabled bodies is presented as akin to the sort of “decadence” of these evil Persians. (If a necromancer brought Edward Said back to life to watch 300, it would probably kill him again.)
The movie is basically a Triumph of the Will for Spartans and torture for anyone who’s actually researched Greek history (Leonidus calling the Athenians “boy lovers” is teeth gritting, part of a Spartan education was getting fucked by older men…)
I like realism. I also like fantasy. It's interesting to see different peoples takes on these characters imo. I think it would be boring if every time they make a new Superman franchise it was exactly like the last one.
I 100% expected this movie to suck and was even saying up to its release that it would flop.
I've seen all the Superman movies since the 80s. And all the TV shows.
This is my favorite movie.
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/48819895
Some conversations about it here. No spoilers, as of this writing.
The cinematic-repubLkan-universe kindness is weakness.. Good doesn't pretend to be evil. But evil does pretend to be good..ffs, 'the list is on my desk..."
I just came out of watching the new movie.
In the scene in which Clark gets interviewed, seen also in the trailer, it is transparent that Superman is with Francesca Albanese on a very current issue.
That's what they are mad about.
I guess WB/DC is gonna fall out of grace.
That makes me more interested in watching it honestly.
I am not an American and I have never been a Superman fan. I had fun, I felt represented, I was entertained, cannot wait for a sequel, am looking forward for Peacemaker S2 and whatever else is planned.
Warmly recommended. I really think all Americans should see it, as it may have a very good and stronger effect on them.
I'm out of the loop here. I've seen something about the most recent director or writer calling Superman an immigrant, and Dean Cain hating on that take and calling it "woke". But I haven't seen anyone expressing that Superman should not represent kindness.
FWIW if you are looking at reviews for an upcoming or recently released movies, and a lot of the comments are calling it "too political" or "woke", give it a watch and come back with your own review. Those reviews are an indicator to me that it might be somewhat thought-provoking. (or also don't watch if you have no interest in the subject)
Yes, people are angry that the director talked about Superman being an immigrant (even though he has been from another planet since the character was concieved) and they are also angry about the director saying Superman represents kindness, because apparently just being nice to people is woke now
Sadly not a new issue for Superman. His backstory was even retconned in the comics for a bit to have his spaceship give birth to him so he could be born in America.
What? When? I'm not a Superman fan, but even I know he was born on Krypton or whatever his planet was, and his parents were royalty I think, and they sent him to Earth as a baby to survive, where he was raised by farmers to be a GOOD YOUNG AMERICAN WHITEBOY but then he discovers his powers and thankfully his parents were actually good people and not goddamned nazis and he goes around helping people and fighting his greatest enemy, Lex Luthor that bald guy that represents capitalism whose name is way too close to the Christian devil.
So he's an anchor baby? The reason we need to repeal birthright citizenship?
I'm seeing comments on Facebook telling me "he's not an immigrant, he's an alien from space". I'm so confused as to how they don't consider someone from a different planet to be an immigrant
What was that post from 4chan telling aliens to fuck off, and calling them space [REDACTED]s? Magats are so fucking stupid and evil, that they would tell Superman to fuck off.
Isn't the take more like "You think it's super-human to be kind?!?"
Did someone acctually expressed that thought?
Yeah, Dean Fucking Cain did.
The worst Superman in my lifetime.
I never watched his series, but there was a photo of Cain as Superman accompanying the article and he certainly seemed to be the most smug self-satisfied Superman out there.
I'm aware if him critiquing him being emigrant end "woke" - which is idiotic, sure. Not aware of him criticyzing Superman for being kind.
https://newrepublic.com/post/174950/christianity-today-editor-evangelicals-call-jesus-liberal-weak
this is what those people want.
Idk, I always thought Superman was cool, but a little boring and vanilla. I normally prefer Batman. Admittedly, I've never dived down the Superman lore pit, but I am aware that he gets a little darker sometimes. He's definitely one of the better role model heroes. Anyone that actually hates Superman, is a dipshit.
Batman is definitely cool. That just can't be disputed. He definitely spends a fuck ton of money on the city. His main obstacle, is the writing. Gotham City has to be awful. It has to be, or there is no story. He can't kill villains regularly, because of plot. If the problems were capable of being fixed, then he'd be on of the best possible people to solve them.
The problems are capable of being fixed. The people of Gotham take to crime to survive because they have been squeezed by the ruling class and it’s the only way to protect what remains of their material conditions.
The Waynes and people like them, the owning class, prop up a system of inequality that forces these conditions to endure.
Bruce Wayne, the richest and most powerful of all, is hurt back (his parents killed) and instead of solving the systemic issues, he doles out individualized corporal punishment as a vigilante.
It’s the ultimate extension of “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”: Rich people will never acknowledge that the very system that provides them power is the ultimate root of all the issues they intend to solve via violence. Batman is himself the ultimate villain of the story.
Tell that to Bludhaven. Nightwing > Batman.
Nah, Batman is definitely cooler than Dick. Which makes sense, he's been doing it for several more years. I don't know too much about Bludhaven. But I'm pretty sure that it's categorically less fucked up. Nightwing doesn't have to be as effective as Batman imo.
Dick used his money to turn it from resembling Gotham to resembling Metropolis. Cool is irrelevant, Dick is ridiculously more efficient and solution focused than Bruce, who is just obsessed with punishment and subjugation of people who have done wrong, Dick is objectively a better superhero for his city, and is focused on solving problems rather than punishment, he’s also not an asshole or a fascist.
Batman brained a guy so bad he lost his mind and became Calander Man, he is not solution oriented.
Okay, that's fair enough. Does he kill people?
Sadly, no, the no kill rule stuck with him.
Don’t get me wrong, though, I love Batman, I just think Dick has had the benefit of more modern writing and more progressive writers for his solo gig, Batman’s failings are more of a side effect of the era when he was created and the specific writers that have handled his canon more than anything else. Dick ended up being a lot more morally akin to Spider-Man than Batman, his reason for doing what he does is specifically to help people and improve things, as opposed to punishing villains and those who have done wrong. I see him as less of a crime fighter/authority figure and more of a public servant.
But Batman DOES uses his billions to help Gotham. The problem is that most of his rogues gallery is composed of high ranking rich mafia bosses, and the rest are completely insane individuals (or even sane people who just LIKE being evil for no reason like Scarecrow who literally gasses people until they die of fright just to study their reactions). You can't possibly think bribing the Joker with a billion dollars would stop him from bombing orphanages, gassing entire neighborhoods, or LITERALLY NUKING AN ENTIRE CITY.
Investing money into Gotham isn't gonna stop the Penguin or Black Mask from running protection rackets or bribing cops, it won't stop Poison Ivy from commiting literal ecoterrorism, and it won't stop Victor Zsasz from gutting people to death with knives, or Deadshot from assassinating people.
Oh, and another thing: the city is actually fucking cursed with evil black magic. That's not hyperbole. The city literally makes people evil.
Batman only is a vigilante because his work as Bruce Wayne is not enough.
You're missing OP's point. Depending on which Joker origin story you're looking at, then the man would never become the joker in the first place. Like if we go with the recent movie version of Joker's origin, he became the joker in large part because of an awful healthcare system and a horrible social safety net system. If he got good care and treatment all through his life then he never would become the Joker
Depends on the comic. Sometimes he has philanthropic initiatives that get attacked by the bad guys.
In fiction, hard agree; in reality, I'd summon super man over bat man pretty quick. I think he's boring because he doesn't leave much room for interesting conflict. irl, I don't want interesting conflict lol
I'd prefer benevolent god over tech wizard bdsm billionaire exceptionalism. The guy choosing to be small is far greater than the guy buying big shoes
Wouldn't say I hate him, he just bores me, his plots are kinda lame, and I don't like his personality. Invulnerable to everything but some supposedly rare rock that's actually everywhere apparently with how often he finds himself encountering it. They eventually added magic I guess because kryptonite showing up like table salt was getting old. Then has the whole goody two shoes paladin act going on. Just a yawn fest imo.
He has all the power in the world and chooses to be kind. That's awesome.
Yeah, it's amazing how many people think admitting to being an asshole is a flex.
This POS
You mean 5'10” tall Ben Shapiro? The guy that never talks about his height and is actually 5'6”? The self confident alpha male? Yeah fuck this guy.
Does alpha male mean closet gay?
Benny (“having a wet pussy is a sign of an infection, according to my doctor wife”) is just jealous of anyone who can pull off an acting career.
It still feels weird when people mention he has a wife.
Not just bcs he is misogynist, but he looks gay AF.
Stupidman.
They don't want Superman, they want Brightburn.
I enjoyed that movie, but the part at the end where they included Aquaman and Wonder Woman was stupid.
It seems like Superman is the hero we deserve to fight this fascist trash sitting in the White House and beyond.
We need more of these positive representations, and god I'm so glad that almost every hateful right-winger cannot be creative with something other than hate.
This movie gives me hope, but I cannot speak for you.
I haven't seen the new Superman yet. I'm going on Tuesday cause that's the cheap day where I live. I'm looking forward to it though. I found Captain America 4 cathartic, watching Captain America beat up an angry president. I think Superman will also be cathartic with what's going on in America
we all think we deserve superman, but we only deserve freiza.
Billionaires like Peter Thiel have thought long and hard about why they can’t get everything they want. He has effectively said that his own policies would be so unpopular that nobody would ever vote for them, but that he has found the internet to be an effective tool to sway populations.
So what about us makes the world so good that they can’t fulfil their darkest desires? Social cohesion, knowledge and empathy.
What have himself, Muskrat et all have inundated us with over the last few years is their “antidote” to that: stranger danger, disinformation and “empathy is weakness”. It’s the playbook of the billionaire psychopath and people don’t realise they are dancing to their tune.
Interesting point! I've recently started thinking about the core message of Christ. It's been misused and abused for millennia, but at its core it literally is "treat people like you would want them to treat you".
But if everyone thought that way, where would the support for war come from? How can we justify monstrous behavior for profit without figuring out ways to make the victims seem like different people than we are? Horrible people who deserve the violence!
People have this ability to take the most constructive, beneficial and altruistic ideas and bend them to create victims and justify violence.
This shit has been happening since the first person used a thunderclap to elicit a sacrifice. The new church is social media, and the new congregation is worldwide.
Matthew 22:36-40 New International Version 36 “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?”
37 Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’[a] 38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[b] 40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.”
Word
Kidness is woke. And you know, woke is bad because reasons.
Why batman is the worst superhero, just another billionaire...
Ironman is another billionaire.
Hollywood whitewashing billionaires...
We won't see a poor superhero anytime soon
Spiderman was just some orphaned kid from Queens.
and look how they made him a lackey for Ironman in Marvel universe!
IronHeart. I don't know if Riri is dirt poor but her needing money to build tech is a major plot point.
And Republicans got mad and said it was disrespectful to Tony to acknowledge he needed money to build his tech.
Wasn't she just an incredibly horrible person though? I haven't seen it.
At least he invents his own stuff unlike batman.
Plenty of people want to inflict pain or see pain inflicted, as long as it's on the appropriate victims, and these people aren't all on the right. It's a common human trait.
Kill them with kindness.
nah, the rich has to be eaten
at that point you're calling for genocide
psychopathy is just as much an ethnicity as any religion
fine, would you rather I defend east Germany?
I have a theory of society that is 30-30-30 based around a narcissistic spectrum. 30% of the population at any given time is narcissistic to some extent. They are conceited in their interactions with society.
We live in a time of decline. This is creating stress throughout the population. How people react to this stress shows their true character. The narcissistic leaning people, during these times of stress, look for scapegoats. If we just eliminate these types of people, we can go back to the good times. They are the fascists throughout history. When fascism and mindless violence rises during times of decline, it is due to this latent population, which is always there but only activated by the stress of decline.
The other groups are the 30% who are altruistic and cooperative. They interact with society by seeing what can be built by all and the value of different types of people. They have won the day too throughout history, but a society the averts disaster by coming together and rebuilding is just a society that continued to be successful. They are little noted as they do not bring the great calamities and destruction that get written down in the history books.
The final group are the 30% who are ambivalent. They don't engage with politics in a meaningful way and have little willpower. They see life as a fate to be endured. Whichever way the wind blows, they will follow, or at least, endure it.
The balance determines which side wins. It is influenced by the power structures of the day, the zeitgeist and the strength of propaganda and the leaders of each side. It's fairly clear which side is winning now and I don't see the altruistic side coming to save the day any time soon.
Often times, when altruism does prevail, it is because someone with great courage that is a member of the existing power structure leads their cause. There are no such people at this time. Our power structure has explicitly embraced greed and sociopathy for 50 years now. Everyone who is successful now has been a part of that system and is thoroughly corrupted by it.
Good theory but the math is off, 30+30+30 only adds up to 90. What about the other 10%?
The balance. It ebbs and flows with the cultural landscape of the times. It determines which side prevails.
And just a hunch, I'd say it leans toward the ambivalent center most of the time. But as things get tough, it would become more activated and polarized.
Hard agree
Being selfless, kind and peaceful even when powerful quite literally goes against the Western ethos and to deny it is to deny not only history but contemporary Western societies as well (from the neverending colonization of the world, native American genocide included, to the recent "empathy is a sin" take, lol).
There are good people and bad people all around the world. The bad people sometimes tend to be a little bit louder than the good people and sometimes drown out the people that are kind and genuinely do care about others.
So while, no, I’m not going to tell you that there are not a lot of bad people in the world we live in. There are good people too. Pick and choose the people that you surround yourself with and surrounding your self with kind people can make a world of difference.
Their religion / tribal cult only wants to use the United States, forget about "Truth, Justice and the American way", they want US soldiers to pay with their blood.
https://odysee.com/@Brando:c/Secret-Identities---The-Jewish-Origins-of-Your-Favorite-Superheroes-(Pt-1):f
Yeah it’s really wild
People are angry about this?
I didn't even know he represented kindness.
I only watched a cam-rip and stopped after Louis Lane "interviews" Superman which was painful to watch. The typical reporter tearing and deliberately misrepresenting or framing things in the dominant world order, every question a cut and propaganda criticizing people who disagree. It was kinda gaslighting, like "why did you attack our ally unprovoked?! Also some people are saying you're an alien spy!". Instead of asking questions to get the truth, they are loaded questions that can't be answered without making yourself look bad.
What a total failures as a character introduction and makes her instantly an unlikeable removed. I mean holy shit is that bad storytelling. Or is that just me? If that is what you think a reporter should do, then don't do it as a friend / girlfriend, and if that is how you see the world that you are not worthy of being the girlfriend of a hero like Superman. Because in my opinion you're one of the villains in real life.
I do suspect this plays into why some people disliked superman. What people seek in these troubled times is strength. And they hate what tears strength down, seeking to control or subdue it or put it in it's place in the proper order of things. They want someone to break things because deep down we all know the path we're on right now leads downward (economic inequality, enshittification of products, appliances and services, climate change and environment, rising tensions, news and social media, post truth world). The people voting aren't entirely wrong in just wanting to see the world burn.
There is a quote which I don't know where it came from or remember well: "The samurai valued strength above anything else, because that is where all other values flow from". Or differently: "The samurai believed that strength was the foundation of all values, as it enabled them to uphold honor, loyalty, and discipline."
But our liberal world order sees strength as something that has to be separated, atomized, means tested and distributed into channels to control. Controlled by laws, bureaucracy or better yet, the dictates of capitalism, because it's oh-so-efficient. I suspect right wingers like Homelander not because he's a corporate product, but because he breaks out of that and goes rogue, and also rejects the "we must not kill anyone and obey the laws or we will be like the villains!" bullshit.
The cult of personality or hero worship represents a desire of people that someone comes and fixes all this shit and cuts through the red tape. Someone who has strength and the courage to use that strength, despite all the clever fucking shitty arguments and conventions to the contrary. Because we've heard it all before and it sounds so good but it's clearly not working. Superhero movies are supposed to fulfill that wish and grand escapism into a world where our problems are magically solved. But recent movies (Marvel) failed to do that, instead pushing the failed real world fantasy of a liberal world order into the movies. Like the common trope of Washington and the government being fundamentally good and working well, except for a few bad apples, and as soon as you get the proof and give it to the good people or the newspapers, everything works out fine. Which is a painful reminder that it doesn't in real life.
I suspect the "reactionary backlash" is not just about racism, it's about the rejection of the distraction of identity politics - that if we only lean in more, if we accept different cultures, everything will be fine - because that is just distraction from the continued neoliberalism and disaster capitalism. But breaking things and bringing things to a head is also an opportunity - accelerationism.
These are just by jumbled thoughts on how this reflects on our culture war. Again, I haven't watched the movie or read any of the right wing critiques, only seen the "liberal backlash to the backlash". This controversy in itself is rather predictable and pisses me off. Like it's a distraction in itself, a pair of two anger memes that complement each other perfectly are tossed into the ether to continue to keep us occupied.
Also after I stopped the movie I read some (serious) reviews and it's also just a shitty movie.
Yeah the value of art is that it can express or show things about the world that are hard to express in words. And we desperately need a new way and clarity about the failure of the old ways, because that is what leads to the cynicism and hopelessness. So either keep politics out of it and produce harmless entertainment, or have a bloody brilliant take on politics that provides actual artistic value.
I quite like superhero movies as escapism, like a fantasy world where clear definitions of good vs evil exist. But I can't stomach biopics or docudramas that mix this fantasy with real world propaganda, like some nostalgic fantasy about US politics or journalism any more. It feels like they all want to recreate the beautiful fantasy of Sorkin's "The White House" or the classic thriller take of "a bad apple in a good system" but today that is a dangerous lie.
Nah kindness is Woke
Ok, I don't think kindness is a bad thing but I do think the type of hero who's all vanilla and too good to be true feels fake. I can't relate to someone who always makes the right choice without fail and who has near unlimited power. I also think it makes for a more boring story. I like stories where the heroes aren't perfect and need to learn to be better.
I kind of agree. I enjoy Superman but also prefer heroes who are more morally grey. But my post isn't about people who dislike Superman because he's a Mary Sue, it's about people who are angry that Superman values kindness
It doesn't have to be boring to make a story about people who always makes the right choice it's just more challenging to write. You need to write scenarios where it's not clear what the ethically correct choice is and have the the hero have to figure that out.
A large part of Star Trek (at least back when they had good writers) revolves around that. In fact movies like Captain America Civil War also revolve around a bunch of people wanting to do the right thing, just not agreeing on what that is.
When the writing is bad, stories about a character being bad then learning to be good can be just as boring as a story about someone being good from the beginning. It's just generally easier to write a story with character learning something because you don't need to do all that much world building to create an interesting ethical dilemma.
A. Not a shower thought.
B. literally people just complain to complain. The movie is like the highest rated superman film in a very long time. Man of steel was cool I guess. But this newest one is much much better.
A. I could definitely have this kind of thought when showering after an argument