Spyke
Klearreply
quokk.au

So if I'm getting it right, gobject is short for gnugnu(...)gnuimptklibobject.

103
marcosreply
lemmy.world

Following the modern C conventions, the text following the series of (gnu) doesn't matter and you can write anything you want there.

15

It is front recursive so it's really "...is not unix is not unix is not unix is not unix image manipulation program tool kit object" and that first g doesn't exist.

12

It's recursive so it's more like gnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnugnu...

4

Now you need to write a layer of typedefs to map the expanded names back to their original types.

3
sh.itjust.works

I think this is sarcasm, but just in case it isn't... GNU is a recursive acronym for "GNU's Not Unix".

32

My guess for why they chose the letter g is that gnu can be phonetically the same as just nu, but keeps people from interpreting the name of the project as a dumb spelling of "new".

2
mercreply
sh.itjust.works

Yeah, they missed the best part.

GNU stands for GNU's Not Unix, which is a recursive acronym. And, when pronounced properly (like the animal) the G is silent. The entire Linux ecosystem has words that start with G based on an acronym where G essentially comes from nowhere, and isn't actually pronounced.

21
rocnatreply
lemmy.world

Well, I dont wanna start a debate, but the official website of GNU indicate that the "g" in GNU isn't silent.

So it depends on whether you want to pronounce it "properly" or as it was intended.

The name “GNU” is a recursive acronym for “GNU's Not Unix!”; it is pronounced as one syllable with a hard g, like “grew” but with the letter n instead of r.

https://www.gnu.org/gnu/pronunciation.en.html

17
mercreply
sh.itjust.works

Well, I dont wanna start a debate, but the official website of GNU indicate that the "g" in GNU isn't silent.

Yeah, but that's wrong. It's named after the animal, and the animal is pronounced without a G sound. I'm not going to mangle the pronunciation because they screwed up.

-3
zqwzzlereply
lemmy.ca

Jnu enough to stoke an ancient flame war for my personal entertainment.

44
Klearreply
quokk.au

You can easily answer this for yourself by looking up what the G stands for.

Wait...

19
floofloofreply
lemmy.ca

The G in GIF stands for Graphical, but the G in Graphical stands for Graham Crackers, the G in Graham Crackers stands for God, and the G in God stands for Gnu. From there it's Gnus all the way down. Also, God pronounces "Graphical" with a soft G as in Jod.

29
iegodreply
lemmy.zip

Also, God pronounces “Graphical” with a soft G as in Jod.

🤣

10

That is why large companies don't want you to find where it is. The application of proprietary condoms to GNU licensed body parts would taint them with gpl license.

2
lemmy.world

gnusnotuniximagemanipulationtoolkitlibraryobject

51

Sequel to The Satanarchaeolidealcohellish Notion Potion by Michael Ende nobody asked for.

7

Just a regular German word. Please keep walking, nothing to see here.

2
lemmy.world

In case you were wondering the 'w' in 'wine' stands for 'wine', and the full acronym is 'Wine Is Not an Emulator'. What do you think the 'w' in 'Wine Is Not an Emulator' stands for?

40
toynbeereply
lemmy.world

I once tried to play "PHP" in Scrabble and argued that it should be infinite points.

The opponent didn't agree.

19

It's personal home page and I don't care if they retconed it

8

As a younger teen trying to get starcraft running on my linux box, my parents were definitely upset when they saw me browsing "winehq". They thought I was trying to get booze shipped to our house :D

17

It originally did not. Then it did for a time. Now it does not.

4

I remember a time when almost every category of tool had something named "Yet Another [Thing]" because there were already so many options to choose from when they decided to make their own.

28
lemmy.world

I.......I lost track of what just happened. G stands for......something, I imagine.

28

Well it kind of stands for nothing, because at the center of this onion is GNU, which is recursive. It stands for "GNU's Not UNIX", so the G in GNU stands for GNU.

18
lemmy.cafe

And this really exposes a major challenge with FOSS.

Names have meaning - it's why Office is called Office.

This gnu naming isn't much of an issue, because this is stuff only technical folks handle. But if we want end-users to embrace things, we need meaningful names - meaningful to them.

Whenever I tell my friends or family to install Jellyfin so they can access my media, the look on their face says it all.

MediaMonkey - alright, I get it (yea, not FOSS)

Plex? OK, if someone then says "think MultiPlex Theaters", you get it. (Also not FOSS)

Jellyfin? What is that? Jam on a sharkfin?

These work really well:

Resilio SYNC (Yeah, not FOSS, but the name makes sense)

SyncThing (FOSS)

FolderSync (not FOSS)

Notice a trend here?

I have a printed spreadsheet for all the software I use - if I haven't touched a service for a couple months, I'll forget the meaningless name.

17
BlueKeyreply
fedia.io

Counterarguments:

  • Chrome
  • Edge
  • Sky
  • Adobe Acrobat
  • Outlook

All wellknown programs or services where the name has no relation to the purpose.

47
roorooreply
feddit.org

These are all major commercial services that can afford advertising or are already more than established. Most FOSS doesn’t have these perks.

11
drosophilareply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

I don't even necessarily disagree, but I think that position is unfalsifiable because if the example is a highly popular program then "that doesn't count because it's big", and if it has a small user base then "of course it's small, it has a shitty name".

10

This.

Nobody's going to forget the name of the browser they use every single day. But if it's some niche tool that I have to look up every time I use it once every few years, that's more difficult.

7
schnurritoreply
discuss.tchncs.de

Compared to how Microsoft names things, FOSS naming is harmless on average.

Think of them naming the gaming app on Windows PCs "Xbox", or the distinction between "VS Code" and "Visual Studio Code", or "edit" (msedit), etc etc

14

Outlook (new) classic new new final (7). Teams (personal). Multiple products with wildly different appreance and somewhat different functionality. And then the whole 365-environment naming, starting from the platform itself.

8

I've always despised their naming schemes. I always thought I'd they ever started a car company they'd name their vehicle make as "car".

At least Xbox is original but now I'm sitting here wondering if they bought it off a small outfit

2
lemmy.world

GIMP is an acronym for what's arguably the most descriptive name possible: GNU Image Manipulation Program.

8
lemmy.world

But the acronym totally destroys the understandability of the program name and instead is understood as "an unpleasant or stupid person" (https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/gimp).

If you look at similar commercial software you get names like MS Paint, Photoshop or Lightroom.

They should have stuck with "GNU Image", "GNU Photo" or maybe "GNU PhotoEdit".

10

When I teach old people how to use GIMP, we all laugh at the name, I explain what it stands for, and then they don't forget it.

9

This is what confused me about OP, because I think of this as the application (ie program, or tool) not the library. So to put the name of the tool back into a library, seems backwards.

2
tylerreply
programming.dev

I mean you kind of break your point with Plex. I have no clue what MultiPlex theaters are, but I do know what jellyfin is. Lots of names have no meaning behind them, even for very popular things.

11
jaybonereply
lemmy.zip

If they had said cineplex would that have been more meaningful?

3

Sure but only because I’m old enough to understand that. It still would have zero meaning for anyone under 25-30. Like someone else said, multiplex only makes sense if you’re over 40 (which I’m not). So literally in 10 years you can go through two different naming conventions and have literally the next generation not know what you are talking about

Only choosing meaningful names really doesn’t work anymore. Stuff moves too fast, language moves too fast, and things change constantly.

2
lemmy.world

At least over here, Cineplexx is a really big movie theatre corporation. That makes it easy to understand what Plex is about.

3

I have no clue what MultiPlex theaters are

So back in the earlier days of cinema, you'd go to the Cineplex to see a movie. A Cineplex would only have a single screen for viewing movies while the multiplex would have multiple screens for seeing movies on. This started with the first duplex theatre in 1915 and later the first triplex in 1966, shortly followed by theatres with 6+ screens which is around when the term "multiplex" started being used. Basically for anyone born after the 80s (therefore anyone under the age of about 40) the term is largely obsolete since most theatres have at least 4 screens and qualify as multiplexes, plus the industry has seen so much consolidation that smaller independent theatres with 1-2 screens are pretty uncommon now

2
sh.itjust.works

It's called Jellyfin because "streaming" is something water does,

The rest of it is diffcult to know for sure but fins guide you and jelly is flexible, and Jellyfin is a fork of Emby - so maybe they were going with "[e]N comes after [e]M alphabetically?"

Here's where the service was named:

https://github.com/joshuaboniface/Emby/issues/2

6

Good explanation. I'd say that's still a lot of processing for our noggins to quickly adapt to a framework of mind to comprehend all that to make sense of it.

I still like the name and it does make since after it's all spelled out.

3

Nah, AI almost always gives the most anodyne, bland, wet-fart name ideas, because all it can think of is stuff that's already been thought of.

The only real use cases for AI are things that computers are good at: pattern recognition in large datasets, search, translation, sentiment analysis, natural language processing and synthesis, that sort of thing. When you can bring those strengths to bear on the problem you're in business. Sometimes a neural network is the right choice; more often (at least right now) you can do as well or better with a more "dumb" algorithm. Even when a neural network is the right choice (such as when you have a non-deterministic problem), using a small one selectively is almost always a better option than feeding the entire thing to a gigantic model.

Legitimate use cases for LLMs (beyond simple toys) are remarkably niche at the moment.

8
lemmy.world

As a former Windows user, it still is taking a long time to wrap my head around all this new terminology, functions, and systems.

This doesn't help. XD

13

Reminds me of an old joke about how everything in KDE has a k and it's very annoyink and irrtitatink bekause they have less laks user interface kuidelines than GNOME. (I haven't checked, they've probably vastly improved since then)

5

the g in gobject stands for glib, and the g in glib stands for gtk, and the g in gtk stands for gimp, however the g in gimp stands for gnu, so really the g in glib stands for gnu

So gobject is gnuimptklibobject

1