Spyke
asklemmy·Ask Lemmybymarighost

You are given an opportunity to hard reset our universe (particularly, the Earth). You are also allowed to change one rule about the new universe. What rule would you change?

The rule could be anything, as funny or as serious as you want. The universe will progress in a similar way that it has up until this point, unless your changed rule prevented it from doing so.

Some examples might be:

  • The invention of currency is not allowed.
  • Iron is slightly less stable.
  • The Ancient Greeks are able to cultivate Silphium, which does not go extinct now.
View original on lemm.ee
lemmy.world

I'm going to keep this for when I have to explain non-Euclidean spaces during game night.

12
frankreply
sopuli.xyz

I always use Chess boards to describe non-Euclidean spaces when I "need" to (aka when I get even a narrow chance to)

3
lemmy.world

By all means, explain it to me! My best way so far was siting the chase in call of Cthulhu and really it's not a great example.

3
frankreply
sopuli.xyz

Heck yeah, I'll try my best!

So on a euclidian chess board, moving your king one space left would be 1 space, one space up would be 1 space, and one space diagonally would be √2 spaces (some simple trig gets us there).

Chess however, does not obey the laws of Euclidian geometry nor does its physical representation show us things to scale. A king's move diagonally is the same amount of space as a move side to side, 1 space.

It's silly, because spaces weren't directly supposed to represent distance or anything, but it's funny that it works out this way

5
lemmy.world

This is a problem I've always had with Square grids in D&D and it never occured to me that from character perspective a character is warping space to move slightly further for the same amount of movement.

4

Also non Euclidian! Hexagons (the bestagons) also tesselate and fix that problem nicely

6
fedia.io

It would change the topographical nature of the universe. We would probably have to exist in like the 3.1415th dimension or something to make it work.

9
lemmy.world

Instant karma. Weighted based on intent. E.g. If CEO cuts benefits to improve his stock value, then his balls explode. If a driver accidentally cuts someone off but feels bad about it, a full mosquito hits the windshield.

75
lunarulreply
lemmy.world

I assume a mosquito that just had a meal even though it wasn't hungry and only wanted to give someone malaria.

5

I mean, we've already got Elon musk we don't really need any more eunichs with nothing left to lose

1
lemmy.world

Greed is removed from the list of possible emotions/personality traits.

61
lemmy.ml

Native Americans are immune to European diseases.

45

My question is, do we get native American diseases that Europeans are immune to?

1
sh.itjust.works

Cats speak french, except in any situation where they can be recorded or transcribed, or when a french speaker can hear them. They also aren't very good at speaking french, but it's impossible for anyone to know that.

40

What if two English speakers are listening to a cat speak French, when suddenly they are joined by a third companion who speaks native French?

6
lemmy.world

All sentient beings have photographic memories and, through DNA, they can store and recall all of their previous ancestors' memories. All the way back to their oldest sentient ancestor.

37
lemmy.world

is born

immediate ptsd from the memory of my parents plowing passionately which ended with my creation

crawls to the roof and jumps

14

You don't want to know others memories; including those of your ancestors. Not photographically at least.

5

Sounding like Richard Rahl and The Sword of Truth now. (Please don't hate me the first 3-4 books were good...)

5
404reply

Or they upload to the resurrection ship

3
fedia.io

A necessary requirement for higher intelligence is proper, functioning empathy. If you lack this, you're just... Incapable of intelligent thought beyond that of a particularly stupid dog

29
Kairosreply
lemmy.today

Humans do generally have proper functioning empathy

16

a moral impetus, informed directly by empathy, that is so overwhelming that the feelings of others are tantamount to one’s own

I’m guessing this is their meaning. Sounds interesting. Maybe that version of humanity would have far fewer nukes and a lot more good sex.

5

The problem is that basic empathy only goes so far. But we [almost] all have it.

1
leftzeroreply
lemmynsfw.com

CEOs and similar psychopaths don't, though.

(Though those already tend to have the intelligence of a particularly stupid dog anyway, so I don't really see how this would change anything.)

3

I thought the thing about psychopaths is not that they don't have empathy or that it's something that's completely bizarre and alien to them, but rather that they have a switch where they can turn it off.

Like most of us would recoil in horror at watching a video of somebody being beheaded on the internet and many of us have had that unfortunate experience, but a psychopath has the ability to not feel anything at all about it if they don't want to.

1

Have to say this wouldn't affect me, not because I don't have any empathy but only cold, logical political solidarity, but also because I wouldn't really class myself as particularly intelligent. I'm just walking here

5

I feel like we would still have many of the same billionaires if not all

3
lemmy.world

Being bad or evil is literally bad for your health.

The better you act, the better your health - great teeth, good muscle, low fat, high fitness, good looks, and longevity (to a point), no addiction or mental health issues, selfless with no crazy ego. Ie Mother Teresa looks like a supermodel!

Health can fluctuate based on behavior but it always drops 3x faster than it improves. So if you fuck around on your wife, your teeth go bad, or you start balding etc. cheat on your taxes, or lie maliciously (excl. good lies like Santa) you start to get fat n ugly.

If you're a miserable prick who fires staff, scams people, bribes, hires children for sweatshops or harms people just to increase profit or boost share price you get cancer. But if you help those people then you may be cured provided you handle it really well and undo all the damage.

You attack someone, pedal harmful drugs or hoard unnecessary wealth, you go blind/deaf until you earn it back, more than once and it becomes permanent, each time after that you lose a limb for good.

You intentionally harm or kill someone via murder, drink driving, rape etc then it's game over via a slow, long, painful debilitating disease that's contagious to anyone you like or care about, ensuring you die alone.

To help identify the good/bad, your gut instincts are 10,000x more powerful and obvious to warn you of the dangers or benefits of each choice.

28
lemmy.world

How is "being bad" decided?

If it's decided internally ("bad" is what you believe is bad), then all the objectivists get a free pass for being assholes. Hitler is a supermodel, etc.

If it's decided externally (there's an universal definition of "bad"), how far into the future does it propagate? If I rescue from drowning someone who will genocide all the Dutch in the future, when do I go bald?

That said, beauty pageants would be much funnier, with trolley problems instead of talent competitions.

25
MehBlahreply
lemmy.world

This is why this one wouldn't work in any meaningful way. Good and bad is a human creation subject to the individuals perception.

12
fedia.io

I think they are saying that in their revised universe there would be an absolute humanity spanning moral code.

And the things that that moral code decide are bad are bad always for everyone regardless.

1

I think they are saying that in their revised universe there would be an absolute humanity spanning moral code.

I think what we have is something much better. A flexible morality which is taught from generation to generation and adapted as needed. An absolut moral code wouldn't work.

Funny enough, that's exactly the way it actually is. And I believe this system still works; not that we could change it anyway.

And the things that that moral code decide are bad are bad always for everyone regardless.

Still, this is how it is. It discourages immoral actions even when nobody sees them happening, because the person doing them still knows and feels bad/shame/worries.

1
leftzeroreply
lemmynsfw.com

Mother Teresa looks like a supermodel

Mother Theresa was a monster who got off on the suffering of others.

18

A disease that kills everyone a bad person knows, even if they don't do anything wrong, is a Bible level of justice.

5
lemmy.world

No quantum mechanics. Things have concrete properties even when no one's watching, and they can all be observed at the same time. The universe is complex but understandable.

Also, P=NP and π is 3.33 repeating, just for the lols.

26
lemm.ee

Base 36 counting becomes predominant.

0 1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 A B

C D E F G H

I J K L M N

O P Q R S T

U V W X Y Z

Also the point at which hundred changes over to thousand gets pushed back by a power, so 6KL2 is Sixty Kay Hundred Elty Two, while 8,A59G is Eight Thousand Ayty Five Hundred Ninety G. Same with the changeover to Millions, Billions, Trillions, etc.

Probably wouldn't change that much practically, but it'd make "Ten" a square that's also the product of two prime squares, and it's divisible by a lot more ways than the current number base, and it makes "One Thousand" the square of "One Hundred" the same way "One Hundred" is the square of "Ten" and that "One Million" is the square of "One Thousand."

21
superkretreply
feddit.org

In our current world, people don't seem to have any ducks left to give, and that's a problem.

6
fedia.io

Silphium was recently rediscovered so it's no longer considered extinct just highly endangered.

Aside from that, I would make it so that instead of having mental illness you would have magical powers.

Schizophrenic? Nope you just talk to the Dead. Adhd? Nope, you're an elemental wizard. Bipolar? Nope, you're either a healer or a necromancer. Depressed? Nope, you're just low on mana. (Major depression means that you're suffering from a curse) Psychotic? Nope, you're suffering a mana storm Narcissistic? Nope, you are an illusionist. Autistic? Nope, you're an enchanter.

16
fedia.io

Maybe instead of schizophrenics talking to the dead they would just fit into the class of spiritualists and diviners, oracles and the like.

I'm open to interpretation.

5

After a little more thinking on this:

Gender dysphoria? Nope! Shapeshifter. Furry? Nope Werebeing

Basically, anything that is a deviation from bog standard human would have a magical reasoning behind it.

1
wabafeereply
lemmy.world

I guess that would mean we can travel faster between planets. Communication would be much faster also.

4
fedia.io

Good news! Internet would be technically faster.

Time would be faster also so you wouldn't be able to tell it but compared to us your internet would be faster

1

"It's not painful bro you just need to feel it for longer you'll get used to it. Ow.

9
sprackreply
lemmy.world

For the next 3.7E-13 zeptoseconds it’s yours. My gift to you.

10
lemmy.eco.br

One free wish for any and every person who achieves something truly outstanding for mankind as whole (only positive achievements).

13

Maybe also for a free "weaker" wish for personal achievements, like completing one's dream hobby project.

7
gassygiantreply
discuss.online

Yes, gravity is a theory. In scientific terms, theories are proven, repeatable, and accepted. It’s the most robust and strongest form of scientific “fact” we have (since new discoveries can change our understanding, we can’t honestly declare it indisputably factual).

When people say “I have a theory…” they usually mean “I have a hypothesis…” which is some idea or problem statement that is unproven, untested, unverified.

OP was playing off the conflation of those two things.

5

I think we are in the same page, I am just so sick of people confusing theory with hypothesis. Mostly because of christomaniac creationists saying "uhm actually evolution is a theory not a law" and shit like thar. That's the reason why I rejected OP's statement

2

If you eat a piece of cheese, you get to levitate for 10 seconds no more, no less. Doesn't matter the size of the cheese or the type (this includes lactose free).

12
feddit.org

Positions of power are filled by people who are not interested in holding power.

12
Yeatherreply
lemmy.ca

Granted, the vast majority of people are illiterate, as there are no longer competent teachers, we never make it out of the stone age, as there are no competent organizers.

3
feddit.org

I wouldn't classify "teacher" as a "position of power" in the sense that people who are mostly interested in holding power over others want the position for that reason.

There's a huge difference between "being interested in power" and "being interested in improving things for yourself and other people". The one is selfish in nature, the other isn't.

There is also a huge difference between wanting a position and being good at it.

1
Yeatherreply
lemmy.ca

And yet, instructors and teachers are in a position of power over there students. A bad teacher can ruin a subject for you, destroy your grades, and get you in trouble. I believe it fits within the definition.

1
wabafeereply
lemmy.world

Wonder what would be the advantages if it has mass?

6

The universe would have collapsed back into itself shortly after the big bang, which would avoid a lot of suffering.

14
feddit.nu

let's get rid of the inverse square law. falloff is now linear.

11

Every time you’re unreasonably rude to someone, you feel a pinprick inside your nostril. If you’re a right jerk it’s more of a stab. When you assault someone the pin is a kitchen knife. Murder and rape make you feel a lance of fire in your sinuses. It could work, nothing else has

3

As a dedicated asshole, I agree

No I'm not a masochist, just that most assholes are more asshole than I am and they fucking deserve it.

1

Oxygen now stably bonds with three hydrogen atoms, not two. The new formula for water is H3O.

Good luck with any kind of life form that we would recognize as being alive evolving.

9
Cataphractreply
lemmy.ml

maybe it would look like a reverse snowfall underwater if the ice is buoyant? I imagine if the ice stayed at the bottom it would be interesting evolution wise since most things survive the cold by being at the bottom.

4

Is it your cake day? What's the cake next to your name mean?

If so, happy cake day!

3

Ice fishing is now just called fishing.

It also becomes much easier to make perfectly clear ice at home: you pour the unfrozen, cloudy water right off the top of any partially frozen thing.

3

Around the time the pyramid of Giza is built, actual Aliens build a slightly smaller pyramid in modern day Tunisia. No one cares and all conspiracies still center on the ancient egyptian ones.

8
lemmy.world

But without a Joestar to do it for you, could you handle the Pillar Men yourself? 🤔

1

People have no imagination, or have literally all the answers and thus no free will in this world then?

Can't imagine a world where people don't create incorrect answers associated with a higher power

8

All physical constants are exact powers of ten; everything should be neat and organised.

8
lemmy.ml

Humans are peacefully with each other and only wage war against aliens or animals threatening to kill them.

8

Granted. Now there's no class war, and the rich fully exploit the poor knowing they are not in danger

(Sorry, some monkey's paw vibes)

5
lemmy.world

There is a normal integer between 4 and 5 but sapient beings are completely incapable of percieving it.

8

sounds a bit boring. how about -1, or pi, or i, or 42?

2

Is he just visibly floating around out there? Was he dead for all the bad shit, meaning maybe we try to resuscitate him? Mine him for minerals? What's the play?

1
lemmy.world

Honestly, i may be the most hardcore atheist, but it would be sweet if there was a God. You could know good and evil for sure, everyone gets what they deserve even if it's only in the afterlife, everything has a purpose...

I think it is objectively true that nature is chaos, we emerge from nature, and everything we believe in (currency, nations, laws, good and evil) are just social convention; all of that is the truth, and adapting to the truth helps me live a better life and make better decisions. But it's hard. It takes mental effort to accept that you're not the center of the universe and it's a disappointing thing to learn. I'm tired and i want someone to hand me meaning and purpose on a silver platter.

7
lemmy.world

You can make your own god, it's not that hard.

You don't have to believe in it, it's just a stepping stone to greater understanding.

Buddhism is a noble religion and people who follow it are in general significantly more compassionate and thoughtful than average, does it really matter that its creator is bones in earth and not a being in the sky?

2
lemmy.world

The reason i'm an atheist is not because i have rational evidence that religions are false, it's because i believe that the underlying mindset is false: objectivity, authority, absolutism, the idea that humans are at the center of the universe, a clear distinction between good and evil, the concept of good and evil itself, etc - none of that is true to me in the sense that it doesn't match reality as i see it. I crave the simplicity and ease of such a mindset, but i can't think my way into it, and i think i'd be further from truth if i did.

2

Ok, that's nice. You're poisoned by Christianity, I get that.

But that's not the only framework.

Your aversion to authority, absolutism, and human supremacy are good instincts, and I commend you for having that mentality, but the thing is you are really way too invested in ratheist dogma.

Objectively there is no good and evil other than what we label. There isn't a single particle associated with hatred, not a single force that aligns with bigotry.

Good and evil are labels we create to try and take our personal prejudices and convince others that they are objective.

For example, I personally believe that Drumpf is evil, because he is the 2nd most significant danger to our democracy, but he is really more just selfish, short-sighted, narcissistic sociopath that was traumatized into a manbaby by his eve more sociopathic father. I use the label 'evil' to galvanize others into being aware of the danger he poses to our country.

but i can’t think my way into it, and i think i’d be further from truth if i did.

sure you can! It's pretty easy actually. I can give you an exercise in how to create a god and you tell me if it is useful for you.

First you need a noble value or ideal that you hold dear that you want the world to be more aware of, a simple and stress free version of this is tree worship. Trees represent growth and endurance, patience, and fertility. These are all noble qualities that you may need more of in your life.

Let's say patience, because everyone could use more of that.

So next, you need to find the embodiment of your god. Look for trees that seem patient to you. I'm not sure how that would look from your eyes, but for me that would be things like a bonsai tree, or a tree that has sprouted out of a sidewalk or retaining wall. Now you need to make the area around your soon-to-be-god special, and what that means is up to you. I like to arrange a circle of interesting rocks, clean up the garbage in the area, burn a little incense but the purification ritual should be uniquely you and is more effective the more it is.

Once the area around the god-to-be is purified, now comes the honoring.

You honor it by first naming it, a name that is meaningful to you, and now boom you have a brand new nature god. Now that you have a name, call out to that name and praise a quality of that tree you want to enhance in your life, i.e. patience.

It will feel silly at first, praising a tree, but trees have a good amount of praiseworthy values. The more praiseworthy values you feel towards your new god, the better.

Now that you honored your new god, it is time for the sacrifice. Something small and personal to you. Something that hurts a little to lose but also represents the ideal of 'patience' that you are wishing to cultivate. Maybe it's a note from your grandma, or a sticker your old middle school friend gave you, or a drop of blood (but don't get stupid, other blood doesn't work no matter what the movies tell you), or even something as simple as a little bit of your lunch that you particularly wanted to eat. Offer that thing to your new god in exchange for their services.

Then thank the new god for their presence, maybe a little more praise (it never hurts), and then end the ritual and go about your day.

Now the next time you are in a situation where you know that being patient will be difficult but rewarding, you can cast your mind back to your new god, call upon them by name, and ask they grant you patience.

All that stuff you did during the ritual has convinced your brain that that tree is actually a person. Not as in, a human, but as in an entity with agency and internal thoughts (even though we both know it's just a clumsily decorated tree). That tree god has all the reality of a person whom you've never actually met but are aware of through the internet. I.e. they are a symbolic entity now that lives in your brain.

The thing is, now you can actually examine that mental symbol you have created for inspiration.

The real godwork:

So spend some time thinking about your tree, what qualities embody patience? Maybe for you it is the ability to split rocks over time. So then you think 'how does my tree god do this?' and you realize it is the buildup of millions of small growths that aggregate to slowly push through with the power of a hydraulic jack (which it kind of is biologically), and then you get the personal insight 'Wow, patience doesn't come from a single act, but from the aggregate buildup of tiny little growths within you as a person that add up to being more resistant to urgency and FOMO'.

So you start to think what those little acts may entail, purposely putting off eating a little longer than is comfortable, or denying yourself a little pleasure to take that time to improve your surroundings, and you start to see a growing range of actions and decisions that lead you towards your goal of becoming a more patient person.

And as your patience grows as you practice these little moments, be sure to thank your tree god for showing you ways to be patient that you did not expect.

Keep this up for a few years, add a few more gods as you go, and you're on your way to being a neoshaman.

Gods are tools our mind uses to tap into abilities we are too nervous to allow ourselves access to all the time. You've heard of the freak strength that mothers can call on when their children are in danger? We ALL have that ability, it is part of our wonderful physiology, but it is SUPREMELY unhealthy to use it, even once.

But imagine if you could call on it voluntarily?

Making a god can allow that, if you are dedicated enough.

We are amazing beings, with capabilities far FAR beyond what we think of ourselves. Making a god can be a way to program yourself around those limitations.

I'm not arguing for the existence of the supernatural, frankly I have zero confirmation on this, but I DO know for a fact and live it daily, that making gods as symbols for the positive changes I wanted in my life has been very effective at helping me transcend my limitations.

2
  • Platinum is now as plentiful as nickel. I'll let astrophysicists figure out the side effects
  • 2cm of solid wood completely blocks any sort of radiation.
  • Complete eradication of STDs
7

Complete eradication of STDs

It's little ones like this that have such insidious implications.
Even without a evil genie rule... No stds.

Which means that sex has no touching

Or

Everything is super fucked up - bacteria/viruses/fungi can no longer transfer from creature to creature through touch... I don't have the knowledgebase to even imagine what the results of this would be but I think somewhat catastrophic....

+-------+

Also wood would be dense as fuck. Damn.

6

"Let's see what scientists say about time if I remove entropy from the equation."

Also: Big Elden Ring vibes. This is basically what Marika does; alters reality and takes death out of it because she got access to the source code of the universe.

7

Everyone has 50% more empathy, with a minimum equal to the previous median amount.

6
shastaxcreply
lemm.ee

What if it is an accident? Do both parties just get erased from the universe? Or is all malice just gone from the human will?

4

No, it's more like

"teamplay": 1;
"coop": 1;

and then you punt your buddies into lava with the rocketlauncher.

1

What about going after the law of conservation of energy?😈

What if energy can be created, destroyed and conserved now? :)

6

Yeah but in this place nothingness creates energy.. so like mini big bangs going off everywhere? Or we talking like zero point energy? Which opens up a bag of worms in our dimension where particles exist and don't so they're coming and going from somewhere, maybe this energy dimension lol.

5
mander.xyz

Lol, I wanted to break this law so that we can have infinite energy sources (fun stuff) and to be able to destroy ~useless energy (like thermal energy which is a byproduct of probably all energy conversions), thus reducing entropy and other fun stuff.

3
lemm.ee

Yeah I was just teasing you. That actually seems like one of the more fun ones here... Though there's some frightening implications.

2

Haha thanks :)

And yeah, this could probably quickly either wipe us out (along with possibly everything else) or help us flourish (along with the rest of the world)

2
feddit.nl

Making the speed of light infinite one hundred times larger and the speed of sound the current speed of light. No more blue/redshifting! Faster communication!

5
Rednaxreply
lemmy.world

Since the speed is infinite, the wavelength is always zero, no matter the frequency. But a wavelength of zero at infinite speed means an infinite number of waves hit the eye in any constant amount of time. Hence, and infinite amount of energy hits the eye at practically the same moment. But assuming your eye (and all of the universe) does not incinerate instantly, you will not be able to see the difference between red and blue, since they are perceived to have the same wavelength (zero). So yeah, technically you no longer have blue/redshifting.

11

OK, I edited my comment. I hope you don't find any more scientific proof against that too!

2
lemmy.world

You both have to solve a new (to you) calculus problem to make a baby.

5

OP said the universe does a hard reset. Life would never evolve if that was a new rule

4
lemmy.world

Our solar system would have a greatly reduced speed of light so as to avoid being attacked by other sentient life.

5
NerfHerderreply
lemm.ee

No black domain for me thanks. Even with A-A around

7
lemm.ee

Explain to me please but also wouldn't that have to mean there was a black hole really nearby

3

It's a reference to a book. But essentially yes you would manipulate the curvature of the universe to put something similar to a black hole around the solar system so that nothing could escape. A Black Domain, or a Light Tomb.

4

Sentient dinosaurs that destroy their planet in a ecological catastrophe like in downer finale of the eponymous series?

1

Any and all personal gain becomes mutual gain.

  • If you don't intend to cheat anyone, the party you're interacting with gains in a similar "amount" as you
  • If you achieve personal gain at the cost of someone else, their net gain will be even greater than yours
  • In case there's no direct party you're interacting with while gaining (such as you running a red light when no one's around to be inconvenienced), society as a whole gains
5
merari42reply
lemmy.world

You now have a hyper-technological hunter society like the star trek Hirogen (or the predator they are a ripoff of)

1

I was hoping we'd go for more of a wholistic biotech thing, like domesticating animals came with hunting, not agriculture. Agriculture just let us domesticate cattle and deer and goats.

Before then we had wolves and dogs and chickens and pigs, and I imagine 5k years of selective breeding coupled with modern degrees of research but in a different direction that by then we custom grow organisms from a caul for whatever our needs.

-1
lemm.ee

No suffering, no dis-pleasurable state, no undesirable reality exists. Everything that is, is deemed good by all beings that can judge it (if any). This has, as a consequence, no moral dilemmas, no conflict of wills and interests, no tragedies, etc.

4
Aabbccreply
lemm.ee

What happens if I light my head on fire

2

I can think of two scenarios. The first one is you do that and everyone, including you, feels it and perceives it in a good way. Which I guess could end up in weird situations. Geeky example, but do you know Magic the Gathering? There's a faction there called "The Rakdos Cult" with a demon and a lot of deranged characters that simply enjoy the bad things. The Rakdos cards often portray a little gorey scenes with people enjoying it, so I guess we could become kind of that but without victims, only enjoyers.

But the other scenario is that we wouldn't have a need to prove or try such things because we often do it out of negative feelings such as emptiness, pride, competitiveness, etc. We wouldn't feel those things so we wouldn't behave as erratically as we do now.

That if we exist at all, though... Maybe existence as we know it is incompatible with my first comment.

1

Then all life would have likely gone extinct long before they even developed spinal columns.

Remember, pain is a fantasy your brain creates to keep you from injuring yourself.

Getting rid of that will mean zero survival instinct.

2
lemmy.ca

No more Pauli exclusion principle. I'm not smart enough to describe what that world would look like... which is exactly why I would do it.

4

I'm pretty sure that would result in all matter compacting down to a single point again...

4

All shows from our current universe that " ended too soon" instead go 1+ season too long, all long running series end with fans craving more.

3

Instead of leap days time just runs backwards to keep the calendar in sync.

3

That whatever species ends up dominating the earth with tools and technology branches out from bonobos instead.

3

Every living creature is entitled to an equal portion of useful surface area of the earth proportional to their size and space requirements.

Not like that has anything to do with us possibly living out of a car next year if rent rises 30% again for the 3rd year running.

Fuck landlords hoarding property.

3

I will hard reset the universe. The new rule is that any sapient lifeform has the power to reset the universe.

Welcome to the crabbiest of crab bucket universes.

3
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Fell asleep thinking of a question similar last night. No colonialism. Colonizing other lands outside of your own established borders would be forbidden.

How different the world would be.

3
Ventreply
lemm.ee

In that scenario, how do you get established borders in the first place?

13

I thought on this also, and I suppose in my "rule" to adhere by I would have to choose a time in human history. I'd likely choose a time from year 0-1000 but would need to research and get input from folks smarter than I before choosing the time that rule would be implemented.

Of course, it only bans colonization. This is specifically the act of taking over lands from those who are indigenous to said lands, usually by force. If the governments of two lands what to trade or sell their lands in agreement without force, this would not be illegal.

I'm certain humans would still find a way to be horrible in some other new fun way.

1

Humans don't evolve, we bring noting to the table of life and dont want to share.

3
lemmy.world

Gravity doesn’t exist. All matter interactions are by electromagnetism and Ver Der Waals forces only.

2
Alleroreply
lemmy.today

Granted. Matter never collects in a way that would allow for life to be created.

3

Is hard to pick one.

Altruism is the default instead of selfishness

Cancer doesn't exist

No harm could come to children. No one would have wicked thoughts towards them. They'd fully recover from any non-lethal injury. They could get sick.

2
lemm.ee

No more questions about “What would you do if you were suddenly given power over everybody else?”

All this what-if-you-were-god stuff is subconsciously programming us to lean in when given the opportunity to control others.

As AI, surveillance, and extended bureaucracy undermine the concept of “freedom” as an inherently good thing, there will be more and more opportunities to control other people.

Indulging in this kind of question — what would you force all people to do if you could? — is normalizing the actual usage of those systems as they come into existence.

2
LainTrainreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

AI is a good thing as long as it's open-source non-commercial used by normal people (not govcorp), nothing wrong with proompting some images in the same way there's nothing wrong with pirating some plugins and throwing a fun track in FL together or even a remix or forking a GitHub project and changing it etc etc. Corpos and/or closed source can fuck off though. Information wants to be free.

It's certainly not comparable to "extended bureaucracy" (read: regulations that protect people from predatory big tech corpos and far-right leaders of that industry like Musk) and surveillance, which you just kinda threw in there to fill out the buzzwords. Like that one is obviously a bad thing but has no rhyme or reason to be with the rest.

3
lemm.ee

AI enables all the telescreens to be watched all the time. I thought the connection was obvious.

0

Impossible; magic, by definition, is something not possible in this world. If we had what we consider magic, it would just be science.

1

So no us and perhaps some really weird disruptions to the fusion chain in stars.

4

My rule is: "greed causes incurable ear loss"

Clarification: I didn't say 'hearing'; I said 'ear'.

1

Nothing is explosively combustible. Gunpowder is inert, oil is just a lubricant. No guns, no gasoline.

1

Fusion makes a bomb like the sun.

Fission makes a bomb like chernobyl.

Seems similar, actually different. We're actually pretty good at fission, but fusion is way harder. The problem with fusion is that you need a huge amount of power to generate a slightly huger amount of power in return, and we are pretty crap at generating a big enough spike of energy to start the reaction and marginally worse at capturing said power after. All in all, pretty far away from practical fusion power.

Fission, by comparison, can happen when you have too many special minerals in a wrong shaped pile. We abuse this effect to boil water, and use that boiling water to make power.

2
Croquettereply
sh.itjust.works

We don't have fusion yet. Once we do, it should solve a lot of energy demands.

1

Nah we definitely have fusion, just not for anything other than bombs.

Fun fact: to set off a fusion reaction, hydrogen bombs actually have a smaller fission bomb inside it. Sometimes multiples of fission-fusion reactions all stacked inside of eachother like nesting dolls.

3

I believe both. Fusion bomb was made after the fission one. So ya, that's a tough one.

But I suppose as long as we're just making wishes, there's got to be one like things can't explode but you can still get harmless energy from them or something like that, so stars still work. Idk,this one might require a physicist to phrase it right lol.

1
lemmy.world

Any public service over $1m revenue needs to offer a childfree version.

0
WldFyrereply
lemm.ee

What do you mean? Do you have a couple examples?

3
WldFyrereply
lemm.ee

I don't understand, my wife and I are childfree but I don't get you or the other commenter are getting at

1

I'd create an actual god with morals of absolute good that rules over humans with an iron fist. Political debates? There's an objective answer and the god knows it. Do something wrong? Get warned. Do something very wrong? It's brainwash time.

-1
lemmy.world

Really cool one here: nothing capable of industrialization gets to exist.

-2

Ye. Also literally cool because global warming and all. It almost all ties together.

1
lemmy.world

Remove every soul that would ever become a parasite 1%, or a Wiccan. Both rotten to the core.

-4
marighostreply
lemm.ee

What's wrong with Wiccans? I know a few, they're fine people.

5

A lot of them are assholes in one way or another, at about the same distribution of every other social group

1