Spyke

Replies

Comment on

Is this true?

I think sequence breaking is fun, and it works better in open world games. IME many modern open world games avoid this by tightly tying loot to levels or stats that you increase by leveling or even advancing the main story, which kinda defeats the point of open world games IMO.

Though honestly, I do enjoy having at least an illusion of choice, very linear games that don't even maintain an illusion of openness feel really restricting to me. Modern open world RPGs just took it way too far while getting some of the important details wrong.

Comment on

Picked the wrong day to start a Red Dead Redemption 2 replay rule

Reply in thread

Medieval societies already had some division of labor, even actual medieval medicine experts generally knew enough to treat small cuts. Since it's a relatively high-magic world (Divinity's Rivellon), chances are decent that they have actual healing magic, too (whether that's actually accessible to peasants and random foreigners is another matter TBF). So I'm not saying the medicine I could access would necessarily be great from a rich western country's perspective, but trying to survive there for a year isn't exactly a death sentence, either. Lots of other game worlds would be way worse.

Comment on

Picked the wrong day to start a Red Dead Redemption 2 replay rule

Game I've been playing the last couple of days is high-ish-magic medieval-style fantasy, which isn't the worst world to live in. Question is whether the protagonists have been through the area yet, otherwise there's nonzero risk of dying from supernatural creature attack or evil cults, on top of goblins and orcs which probably aren't any worse than historic "barbarian" attacks but deadly all the same.

Comment on

Do not use ai

Reply in thread

The tech bro goons don’t own the technology.

They do own ChatGPT and other commercial LLM services, though, which is what most AI users use, and they made the hardware to run local AI models prohibitively expensive for a lot of people.

Comment on

[WP] An atheist in a world where gods are objectively real and there's proof.

Definitely been done, though. There are lots of fantasy worlds where divine beings are objective fact, which is often directly experienced by protagonists. AFAIK in those cases, the claim by in-universe atheists tends to be that those are just powerful beings, not gods, which kind of seems like a distinction without a difference to me.

Though it does become philosophical. What IS a "god", and if we accept these beings as gods, should you worship them? Are they worship-worthy, and are they going to punish people who refuse to worship them? The last part is kind of independent of whether they're really gods, even a powerful being who is literally just a mundane human (e.g. a king) can still make your life hell if you refuse their demands.