Spyke
politics·politics byMicroWave

Trump threatens to pull unemployment benefits from all states for the first time in history

Donald Trump’s administration is threatening to withdraw federal funding for unemployment assistance in all 50 states as part of the president’s nationwide campaign against “fraud” in government spending.

In a letter to the governors of 53 states and territories, acting Labor Secretary Keith Sonderling warned that the federal government would use “every available tool” to combat “waste, fraud and abuse” within state-run unemployment insurance programs, including “withholding administrative funds from states” for the first time in history.

There is no single national program for unemployment support, though the federal government partners with state agencies to support temporary financial assistance to out-of-work Americans. Nearly 2 million people are currently receiving those benefits, while roughly 229,000 people are filing initial jobless claims every week, according to the Labor Department.

Trump threatens to pull unemployment benefits from all states for the first time in historyhttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-unemployment-benefits-fraud-b2997881.htmlOpen linkView original on lemmy.world

Vote for him, places you in financial stress, he pisses the money away, takes more of your money for undefined reasons.

13
ryperreply
lemmy.ca

They could have been thinking of the House part of Congress, since they only listed the Senate.

17

The house is part of congress, the other half being the senate, there was ambiguity and I ran with it

6
PattyMcBreply
lemmy.world

Yes... the white house... exactly... that's the "joke"

0

The house is part of congress, the other half being the senate, there was ambiguity and I ran with it

4
piefed.ca

“The American people will no longer tolerate the blatant waste, fraud and abuse of their hard-earned tax dollars — no state should allow it either,”

Excuse me? If anything, the 2024 election made it crystal clear that the American people will, in fact, tolerate the blatant waste, fraud, and abuse of our hard-earned tax dollars. 77 million people actually voted for it.

165
DokPsyreply
lemmy.world

But they super promised they never even heard of it or was going to use it. Then installed its writers in key positions. Purely by happenstance.

36
lemmy.world

One of the things I hated so much about the 2024 election was all the fucking gaslighting about it, too. There were plenty saying "isn't that just a liberal conspiracy theory" and bullshit about "blue maga" (lol, whatever) and lots of the corporate media doing that sort of collective shrug about a documented plan.

16
lemmy.world

yuuup. so fucking gross - hey we're getting the fascist back in the white house, let's make a list of horrors he can execute!

and the idiots ignored it. the media shrugged. Everyone I know was screaming about it but that tells you a lot about my peers - otherwise, the country just kinda shrugged and said "Yeah but harris slept her way to the top so-"

like, dude, if KH had such a magic vagina that the concept was even conceivable, even then, fuck you, she's way more competent and they are WAY FEWER FASCIST PLAYBOOKS WAITING FOR HER you goddamned dolts

10
lemmy.world

Amen to all that. Also, I forgot about all the "Heels Up Harris" nonsense....a certain type of individual will do almost anything not to vote for a woman, though.

4

yup. or POC. it's amazing the gymnastics they'll go through to justify voting for their grifting cult leader

3
lemmy.world

oops did a bunch of fascism. whoopsie.

the question is in november, how much pain can they put on all the fucks that made this happen? I want to see dems showing up with receipts, blowtorches and pliers

3
GuyFawkesVreply
lemmy.world

My biggest fear is that even if we somehow manage to defeat all the cheating Dems STILL won’t take it far enough when it comes to punishing these assholes. They need to be treated like Confederates but actually held to account.

5

They need to be treated like Confederates but actually held to account.

for real, there must be consequences.

4
DokPsyreply
lemmy.world

But you see, we have to heal and reach across the aisle or something

3

Yeah and what about that $300B in taxpayer dollars we're giving to Iran? Seems like the definition of waste, fraud, and abuse.

13

And you know what happens? This makes the next group of people, i.e. middle class, the next poors! Guess what they want to do to the new poors?

22
bagsyreply
lemmy.world

They don't want to kill the poor, but they don't care if they die. What they want are tons of poor, desperate voters and workers.

9

The Republicans have never cared if the poor die. That's a basic part of their ideology.

This is different though. Starting with DOGE and continuing unabated since, Trump and his Republican lackeys (and his fascist handlers) have clearly deliberately gone out of their way to arrange things not so that poor people might die but so that they will die.

What they want are tons of poor, desperate voters and workers.

Which is exactly what will be left over after they kill off as many "undesirables" as possible.

12
4amreply

What they want is riots so they can declare martial law and hold power indefinitely, Because people are still upset about martial law being declared so “antifa” must be out there still

11
TheFoganreply
programming.dev

Trump and the Republicans want to kill poor people.

Don't forget, he's also very stupid, and I honestly believe the narcisist thinks things are going really great right now, he just can't find a way to get the numbers to agree with him. Sadly, on a purely metric issue this might be a winning play. Unemployment numbers are counted based on how many people are collecting unemployment. Kick people off unemployment = they don't count as unemployed. In his narcisism he might actually believe that "fake unemployed people are making the job numbers worse". Secondly jobs numbers themselves. Take away unemployment, people will work shittier jobs that might delay homelessness, or possibly get food when they are homeless.

7
Nimrodreply
lemmy.world

Unemployment numbers are counted based on how many people are collecting unemployment.

Unemployment insurance claims aren’t used to measure the unemployment rate in the US. But I wouldn’t be surprised if Trump thinks they are… Nor would I be surprised if he tries (or is trying) to change the measure so that it is based on unemployment claims.

To be clear I’m not saying the US’s unemployment numbers are good—they are distorted to make the unemployment number look smaller than it is. One issue is that People must be actively looking for work to be considered “unemployed”, otherwise they aren’t part of the “labor force” and don’t count at all. It doesn’t matter if they are capable of work, want to work, and spent a year straight looking for work; if they aren’t actively looking now, they don’t count. Additionally, if a person is doing any work at all—even a few hours a week at minimum wage, or doing a bit of unpaid work for a family business—they are considered an employed member of the labor force. It doesn’t matter if they are broke, homeless, and desperately looking for a job; they count as an employed member of the labor force.

8
TheFoganreply
programming.dev

Interesting, but yeah I guess that still counts in the sense that still it's pushing say, software engineers that lost their jobs to AI, to absolutely have to take a minimum wage job to, possibly afford enough food to survive while getting evicted/foreclosed etc...

No matter how you slice it, it still does put more people... into a rush to get SOME form of employment. even at the cost of their time that they could be using to get... actually livable employment.

1
piefed.zip

blue collar worker looks up

"Homie, you think we have jobs for y'all?"

3

There's a republican solution for that as well... "lower/eliminate minimum wage so corporations can hire people to do things that are less useful". Think of it, we can pay people $2 an hour to have them stand in a park and tell people they should eat at mcdonalds, normally the conversion rate is too low, but at $2 an hour, if they can get one person to go every 2 hours, it's still profitable.

(and yes obviously this is horribly terrifyingly stupid... and honestly not that far from what many horrible politicians have pushed for).

7
WatDabneyreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Kick people off unemployment = they don’t count as unemployed.

Hmm...

Yes - this is true. And it's essentially 100% guaranted that unemployment, measured honestly, is going nowhere but up.

And with the midterms coming up...

Yes - this seems more likely to be the primary motivation.

6

It's the financial version of "if we stop counting COVID deaths, the numbers will go down"

14

In his narcissism he might actually believe that “fake unemployed people are making the job numbers worse”.

This would be on par for the guy who wanted to "Stop the Count" and figured you don't have a pandemic if you don't test.

3
jaybonereply
lemmy.zip

Who do they think the rich will live off of then?

Or maybe they haven’t thought that far ahead.

6

Oh, they're not planning on killing all of the poor people. Just the unemployed ones.

And with employment protections gone, their conception of undesirables - non-cis and/or non-white - will be over-represented among the unemployed.

And not even all of them will die, but the survivors will have no safety net so will end up homeless, and with homelessness criminalized, they'll be sentenced to private prisons/workhouses and be corporate slave labor.

Basically, they want to cull the herd - just eliminate the people who won't serve an immediate purpose in their planned technofeudalism.

2

They also think that they will save money by letting people get poorer. Moving everyone a step down won’t have that effect.

2
lemmy.world

Waste and fraud… If only someone hadn’t started a war with Iran and then paid them $300B three months later to end it, gaining precisely nothing…

78
sns
lemmy.dbzer0.com

How do empires die?

Gradually then suddenly.

The US is in the latter stage.

67

Living through the fall of the US is the fucking worst but also fascinating. It isn't too often that folks get to see this kinda thing. I hate this so much, but I am very curious to see how shit plays out. I'm doing what I can to improve conditions, but I can only do so much

7

We effectively had our Hannibal moment getting locked into a stalemate with Iran.

3
lemmy.world

This stunt actually has nothing to do with "fraud" in government spending, but as someone with experience in government procurement, contracting is where the waste is. The government actually doesn't do too badly when we keep the work in-house. It's these multimillion dollar contracts to some private company that are where the waste, fraud, and abuse are. Go fucking audit SpaceX. Revisit those contracts. Bet we can save billions every year on just one companies stupid fucking defense contracts. Then go after the rest of these contractors. Threaten to bring the work back in house and see how they react. Follow through and actually bring the work back in house, build the public sector engineering and manufacturing expertise, and see where we are.

66

We’re in fascism these scam companies and the government are one in the same.

1
piefed.ca

I know it's easy to hate on everything Elon, but Falcon launches are about an order of magnitude cheaper than any other launch, primarily by virtue of the fact that launch vehicles aren't single-use. Starship hasn't done that well yet, but the estimates I've been able to work out put the total budget so far for that project to be as much or less than the cost of launching a single SLS launch, and it only has a lifespan of 5 launches before it gets dramatically more expensive. Falcon was cheaper to get into full operational mode than Starship, sure, but if you thought it would be easier to make one of the biggest rockets ever, then you would be mistaken.

-5

Jesus Christ, shut the fuck up already.

You really think suddenly taking millions of people off unemployment is just a distraction from something else?

This is life-ruining shit on a national scale.

Not everything is a "distraction" from the thing EVERYONE ALREADY FUCKING KNOWS ABOUT

7
lemmy.world

But by now, everyone either knows or refuses to acknowledge that the President is a notorious pedophile.

A sudden spike in unemployment followed by waves of debt default, foreclosure, and police actions on the unemployed would seem to be the more pressing issue.

This just feels like the Iran "Today's bombing a girl's school distracts from who the President was fucking in 1997" Epstein War bullshit.

16
Sunflierreply
lemmy.world

A sudden spike in unemployment followed by waves of debt default, foreclosure, and police actions on the unemployed would seem to be the more pressing issue.

He certainly doesn't think so from all the redactions to the disclosures to Congress and the sweetheart deal he gave Maxwell (the co-conspirator who is still in prison today for the crimes he committed and advances).

Today’s bombing a girl’s school distracts from who the President was fucking in 1997.

He had Epstein killed just 10 years ago, and there is no statute of limitations on murder.

Also, its not just him. He's surrounded by the Epstein class who all went in on raping children together.

2
lemmy.world

He had Epstein killed just 10 years ago

The line of people who potentially greenlit Epstein's murder goes down the road and around the block.

Not that it matters, because pedophilia is apparently legal - even encouraged - at this point in US history.

Also, its not just him.

That's been the joke of all these "Release the Epstein Files" folks tossing aside the orgy of evidence on the grounds that "it's not enough". We have a rogue's gallery of Epstein associates who remain untouchable. And the "Release" folks keep pretending there's some extra bit of evidence that's been held back that will finally bring the cops in to arrest everyone.

It's a fantasy. Just like the Mueller Report shit libs were hung up on in 2019. Nobody is coming to arrest the President or any of his close confidants. No organized agency is coming for the billionaire class. There is no secret kabal waiting for that next shoe to drop. There is no X-Files esque revelation that's going to bring about societal change that we haven't already all passed around on social media.

6

I'd wager Trump could publicly do it again, livestream it, and gain more fans because he's "relatable" to those fans

2

They want you so desperate to cling to employment that you will no longer care about working conditions or fair wages or be willing to endanger said employment by being politically active.

48
lemmy.world

Yeah...

But they're idiots.

There's not enough jobs to go around, people won't quietly starve. And the only people with anything to steal from are the wealthy.

They just created a shit ton of people with literally nothing to lose.

22

And time to both think about that fact, and to do something.

10
4amreply

Perfect time to declare martial law and lock up anyone who doesn’t play by their rules and then hold power forever

2

Correct they are effectively rolling back as much as they can to before the New Deal

2
lemmy.ml

What he wants:

  • desperate people who work for scraps
  • riots, so he can call in the military and call off the election

What he (hopefully) gets:

  • a revolution

Seriously, why aren't billionaire villas burning? Why is Mar-a-Lagos still standing? I'm surprised how much the American people are willing to endure.

42
lemmy.world

Oh, just book a trip to Florida and burn down Mar-a-Lago. Why hadn't I thought of that before?

9
gdog05reply
lemmy.world

Surely no one will gun you down within 200 yards.

5

If they start shooting protesters things will escalate. That's how civil wars start.

0
Xerxosreply
lemmy.ml

Have you seen the French protest? I don't say one man should go to there and burn it down, but I would expect big, violent protests there.

1
gdog05reply
lemmy.world

The French only have to protest in France. Imagine the French protesting in Moscow. That's the distance from Utah to Florida. Utah isn't even the furthest point from Florida. Tell some Frenchmen to go march on Russia and protest until they get their way. Now picture that playing out.

6

Sure, America is too big for protests 🙄 That's why I didn't just mention M-a-L, but billionaire villas too. Protests at the closes place that makes sense. The white house, your local rich people quarter, Mar-a-Lagos, an ICE facility, the villa of the local Trump supporter,...

If you get enough people together it's hard to ignore. Make the rich fear the people again.

March when never possible, with as many people as possible. And if that fails? General strike.

Sure there were a few "no king" demos, but they ended too soon and protested the wrong places. The ultra rich and Trump himself should feel the heat.

0
DarkFuturereply
lemmy.world

I’m surprised how much the American people are willing to endure.

At this point I'm convinced we're the weakest generation of Americans in American history. And the fact that our history really isn't very long doesn't help make that feel any better.

6

IMHO it doesn't get any weaker and lower than exterminating indigenous people or owning slaves.

1
Jaxreply
sh.itjust.works

Armed revolution results in U.S. military drone strikes on blue states. I am not joking. This is Pete Hegseth's handpicked military; they're waiting for a revolution to crush.

I'm not necessarily saying a revolution should or shouldn't happen, but you should absolutely be aware of the circumstances on topics like these. Plus, people have tried to attack the president. So many times that it's seemed for a while that these are selected shooters. They've all failed thus far.

6
lemmy.ca

I mean, Trump's war of choice in Iran was an unmitigated disaster. I can't imagine how poorly they would respond to domestic guerrilla warfare

5
explodiclereply
sh.itjust.works

If it's like Iran, it looks like he'd try to fight this weaker force, lose anyways, and then push the cost on all Americans, which would just grow the insurgency. His incompetence extends to military strategy.

3
Jaxreply
sh.itjust.works

Except Iran actually has a military to fight back, not to mention support from China regarding drone supply. I think you're vastly overestimating the average American's capability for war. Especially when compared to the U.S. military.

1

What is the Strait of Hormuz equivalent that U.S. insurgents can control? Because that is quite literally the only reason Iran has a fighting chance.

2

The US military hasn't won against an insurgent force since Vietnam. Big shiny weapons don't subjagate a populace, the USA doesn't have the numbers they need to control a population as large as ours, nor do they have enough to cover the amount of land they would need to control.

1

You can consider it a disaster because iranian drones drilled them a new one. But keep in mind these guys are sociopath with no value for human life besides their own. They would totally send soldiers kill as many as possible while suffering high losses without a second thought.

1
lemmy.ca

It’s like they are testing limits. They keep doing crazier shit week after week then say well no one is doing anything about it so let’s keep going.

37
D_Creply
sh.itjust.works

I'm a cynical bastard who hates that fat orange child raping corrupt disgusting blob of gonorrhoea to my very core and my first thoughts were this is one of two things.

Either corruption. Such as: "why give this money to those poor people when I can have it, I'll funnel it through numerous companies. Plus with that new ruling about me and my family not being investigated by the tax people then there's no way anyone will do anything about it"
Or a scare tactic. "Vote for me in the midterms or lose your benefits. By the time this gets to the courts and reversed you'll be starving or dead AND it's obvious that no one will do fuck all to me for doing this to you"

6

"why give this money to those poor LAZY people when I can have it, I'll funnel it through numerous companies...

I can imagine that in their minds it's fraud because they don't understand employment insurance and just see lazy unemployed people getting paid. They imagine that everyone who receives E.I. are welfare kings and queens.

5
lemmy.world

This is next distraction away from his complete failure in Iran and his green, moldy swimming pool. He's giving $300 billion to Iran in his total surrender, what's the total amount of assistance to be withheld in funding here?

36
lemmy.world

Nah, this is social safety net cutting. Don't you know that desperate people don't care what those above them are doing? (Also, truly desperate people turn to violence, which is casus belli for a nationwide crackdown)

Not everything is a distraction, most things are moves in and of themselves. It's just that it takes place inside so much noise that focusing on one thing loses everything else.

12
Snapzreply
lemmy.world

You're arguing a pont without purpose, it's both. They always have a hopper, packed full of bullshit, and constantly ready to deploy. It's definitely intentional timing, go read up on his relationship with roy cohn and bannon still advising from sidelines. This is how they operate

3

Oh! You think they plan things. Think tanks definitely have wish lists, but the admin just does whatever, switching as fast as possible between them so that news of one rides over the news of others.

The issue with framing it as just distraction is that that language feeds into the idea that this is a smokescreen for something else that's actually important. They're both important, just timed to take air from each other in the media space. It's like a magician robbing a guy and using the illegal demolition of a building he wanted destroyed as the distraction. Both acts are things that are important to the person making the decisions, but one is definitely going to be the bigger attention grabber.

3

"Lets do something fast and stupid so they stop talking about me starting and losing a war."

36

If they remember that, they remember I started the war to distract from my child prostitution ring.

11
lemmy.world

president’s nationwide campaign against “fraud” in government spending.

Projection much, huh?

34

It's rationale: how would anyone need unemployment benefit with the best economy the USA, the world, sorry: the Universe have seen since the US exist the creation of Earth by God??

2

Also privilege, Republicans see themselves as privileged, it's not fraud when they do it, they are allowed, it's fraud when others without sufficient privilege do it.

15
sh.itjust.works

Good do it. Let the states that still have a sense of sanity group up and implement a multistate unemployment assistance strategy. Seriously, perhaps its time blue states encourage the disempowerment of the federal government and transfer those programs to mutually aligned state initiatives. Leave out all the welfare red states and redirect that transfer of wealth from blue states to red states, back to their own ppl. Americas system of statehood and states rights is something dems should probably start proposing making more use of. If feds under Trump don't want social programs then build multistate programs that serve that function, leaving out the Maga central states altogether.

33
andros_rexreply
lemmy.world

The problem with leaving it to the states is that you can live in a place that just fucks you. I visited with a social worker recently about how I was going to pay for a hospital visit with no insurance, and she was like yeah there’s no help here.

Where I live, unemployment is inaccessible. Housing assistance is inaccessible. Pretty much all social services have collapsed.

Is it my fault for being born in a state that hates me?

7

The problem with leaving it to the states is that you can live in a place that just fucks you.

Guess those places need to suffer enough under Republican leadership to learn their lesson and vote them out.

1

Thats not true. My state governor is also a criminal and is grifting on a state level too...

17
lemmy.world

Have to imagine this will disproportionately hurt red states and then they'll blame it on Obama or Biden or something. Really hoping some state will withhold federal taxes but I know our leaders are too spineless for that :[

25

California funds its own unemployment benefits, of course Trump is too stupid to know this.

16

Then, magically unemployment will go down and they'll call it a success. Even though all that's happened are fewer people qualifying for unemployment, and more than likely it will result in a net increase in unemployed people.

8

It says they will take funding from states that don't comply with their bullshit so I'm sure the red states will be fine

7

If you take the top 10 states by unemployment rate, half of them are red states. Top 20, almost 3/4.

5
lemmy.ca

That's the idea. Make it so the poor have no choice but commit crimes and then lock them up for it

10
A404reply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

What the fuck are they trying to do? Why would they wanna destabilize the country?

3

Same reason they rape children. They're raping the nation for short-term profits, and imagine themselves as warlords over the ruins of a fallen world.

1
lemmy.world

Peter Thiel and a bunch of the other billionaires want to carve the US up into city states, they’re not particularly secretive about it either. The point is to destroy the country

It’s a quiet revolution most aren’t even aware is going on

19

Because in its an excuse to send in soldiers, try to justify martial law, suspend elections, and otherwise drag the country deeper into authoritarianism. It's not quite a dictatorship yet, after all.

14
lemmy.today

He just had dinner at Versailles, home of Marie Antoinette.

He's had numerous "Let them eat cake moments," most recently his "I love the Inflation" moment, and sooner or later he's going to cross the wrong line when the timing is right, and he'll meet the same fate.

13

I think he said "these things happen" in relation to the price of tickets - possibly even more recently than the idiotic inflation comment.

2

I don’t know why this is a surprise to anyone. Trump is famous for not paying contractors and workers. He waits it out until they sue and his expensive lawyers beep the plaintiffs dry or settle for some fraction of the contract price.

21
lemmy.ca

So Trump is tanking the economy and burning through cash so bad he has to take money from people without jobs.

18

Technically this would boost "the economy" in the way these guys measure it by increasing corporate profits and stock values because companies will be able to squeeze there workers for more output with the greater threat of unaided unemployment.

But lowering wages would decrease consumer spending

A majority of consumer spending is now done by the top 20%, as long as this doesn't effect them the corporate overlords don't give a fuck.

8
lemmy.world

Jokes on them, it's basically impossible to get unemployment here to start with.

17
lemmy.world

Check me if I’m wrong but the only thing he can cut is the administration funding. The actual benefits are funded by a type of insurance companies pay into. Trump can’t take that away.
All this will do is make processing claims a bitch.

He’s such a dick.

17

Your employer pays into it, but most of that goes to the state.

But yeah, if they aren't going to pay out. Why should I keep paying it.

8

An actual traitor president and it looks like we're just gonna ride it out with our fingers crossed.

15

It doesn’t matter what it is, if it’s for working class, then it’s a terrible idea and needs to go.

Sesame Street FFS.

I do think this is Vought though. Trump is too addled at this point in time.

13

Wait, do we actually have unemployment assistance in the US? I thought it was just a slush fund for boondoggles I was forced to pay into. Every time I've tried to apply for it over the last 20 years I was rejected.

13
lemmy.world

Maybe it depends on what state you’re in, but I have used it between jobs after being laid off. I was actually very surprised how well it worked. This was durning Biden’s term.

9

I used to work for a ski shop. Almost everyone would get laid off in March, rehired in August, and collect seasonal unemployment between. The owner would argue that he doesn't give sick time or PTO because everyone already got four months off paid vacation per year.

3
lemmy.world

Currently on unemployment thanks to the tech industry. I wonder what my trump loving family members will think when I bring this up the next time they ask me how the job hunt is going.

13
lemmy.world

Knowing Trump fans, they're going to say it's a good thing, it'll make you get up and get a job sooner rather than laying around "wasting time on the government dime". Cause they all probably believe it's very easy to get another job.

13

Was going to say the same thing. Besides, if they know you don't support PEDOnald, they'll take it as your comeuppance.

I've had a conservative in-law tell me that maybe I should not be getting by financially, and that was implied as part of the problem under Biden - that I was doing okay. Because I went to college, etc. No, I should be doing less well and that would mean things were properly balanced or something. That somehow PEDOnald didn't "get" people like me the first time around and somehow harmed me and others like me (meaning, again, someone who went to college) - and maybe not only financially and that hopefully that would be different in his second term.

It's just as fucked as it sounds. Did this in-law think it through and realize it would harm not only my kids, but his direct blood relative? If he did, he didn't give a fuck, apparently.

If you aren't conservative and don't support Donvict, you deserve to suffer, in their worldview.

6

I wonder what my trump loving family members will think

Why do you still speak to them? They are traitors to our nation and vote to harm you.

1
lemmy.ca

Beating the wife and the kids at home when he got his ass kicked at the pub.

10

Fuck it, let him. I'm so sorry for all the innocents this will impact, but I'm so over this "I'm going to do something terrible to my own supporters, maybe." Shit.

Let him year down all the shit his supporters have become reliant on, but have no clue.

Fuck 'em all. Die mad and broke you pieces of shit.

8

Cool. Do it. I cannot wait to see what happens before he realizes that his base are beneficiaries of unemployment.

8
piefed.social

Do they like riots and open rebellion, because letting people starve is how you get riots and open rebellions…

8
lemmy.zip

At this piont, me too I guess. I don't like to be accelerationist, but what other options are there? There isn't enough coordination for a general strike, and they've been making moves this entire time to weaken voting rights and install their cohorts in positions of power over the voting system. What now?

3

Stop going to work. General strike. Stay home. Start a vegetable garden. Idk.

1

Let us revenge this with our pikes, ere we become rakes: for the gods know I speak this in hunger for bread, not in thirst for revenge.

3

The biggest waste in the USA right now is the oxygen keeping him alive.

7
lemmy.world

When he breaks California, I hope the red states will like living in cardboard boxes and eating dirt.

7
lemmy.today

Seriously. He wants to destroy the United States by having blue, wealthy, supportive states succeed. Then let's see how his supporters pull themselves up by their own boot straps and levitate.

4

All the fraud is in his home and with his friends. Even if all the people receiving benefits were making fraudulent claims, it would probably amount to less than he and his family are grifting from the US governemnt this year.

7

And still the population will sit behind their screens with their keyboards and sgare a few memes and generally be pissed off and oh look its the next scandal and they population will sit behind their screens and generally be pissed off and oh look its the next scandal of the week...

6
fedia.io

Make the masses even more desperate. Surely they won't resort to extrajudicial means to survive.

5

There's more of us than there are of them. All we need is the will to do the needful, regardless of how distasteful it is. Pushing people to the edge increases that will.

2
lemmy.world

If he’s worried about fraud in government he outta check his pockets.

5
lemmy.ca

Man, he is hell-bent on losing the midterms, isn't he? The only way Republicans are going to hold onto anything after the midterms, is if they cheat...hard.

5
lemmy.world

The only way Republicans are going to hold onto anything after the midterms, is if they cheat…hard.

Which is exactly what's going to happen. Not enough people are willing to "Make MAGA Afraid", they'd rather make it into something silly. The far-right and alt-right are not afraid of us, and that empowers them. MAGA needs to be truly terrified, then we'll win the midterms and the next presidential election. If MAGA is not scared, we won't have another presidential election.

Don't believe me, continue to keep doing what you're doing.

Do you wanna fight? Then "Make MAGA Afraid".

0
lemmy.today

It's really hard to really cheat in a Midterms. A presidential election comes down to one race in only seven states, it's fairly easy.

But there are too many Congressional districts, that are watched too closely by locals, to make it work. The best you can do is manipulate the election environment, and hope it causes enough chaos to benefit your side. But those strategies can often help the other side, too.

And no matter what you do, if you've just been raging shitheads for 2 years, you just piss off enough people that they overwhelm your cheating strategies, and win anyway.

1

So, interesting points. However, consider that just in the last few years:

  • A Trump ally bought Dominion, the largest producer of electronic ballot boxes and the ones used by a LOT of states. Several studies have shown that via a hardware-side injection, it would be quite easy for anyone with physical access to the...power strip, I think, could manipulate the ballot recording without leaving a significant trace.
  • DHS has asked for voter rolls from all states, and ICE/CBP have conducted raids on prominent voter activism groups.
  • The FBI has also normalized raiding election offices and has seized ballots from at least the 2020 election, and at least one sheriff's offices has also attempted to do the same in very similar fashion in California, with very similar warrants, looking for very similar "fraud", and have also attempted to seize ballots.

The big problem with fucking with a midterm isn't ease, it's just scale. When you have cops, the federal and a lot of state and even local DOJs, the President's personal goon squad (which has now been significantly inflated and equipped), and the FBI willing to harass, intimidate, or arrest voters, steal ballots, and challenge every single race, everywhere, all the time, all backed by think tanks and funding orgs that are backed by some of the richest people in the entire world, it suddenly becomes a lot easier to stop up the gears of democratic elections.

Sure, your locals can challenge the results. They can make noise. But at the end of the day, "move fast and break things" works surprisingly well as a governance tactic if your desired end result is maintaining power, because by the time people have untangled the knots you've woven, you're already ten steps ahead and "well it'd be REALLY HARD AND EXPENSIVE to run a special election (if your locality even has a legal way to do that - most don't).

3

Turns out bombing innocent fishermen, killing Americans in the street, destroying the whitehouse, crashing the economy, fucking up gas prices, letting disease run rampant, enslaving migrants, stopping production of physical cash, implementing a surveillance state, threatening to annex our neighbors, cutting any and all trade while alienating our allies didn't do the trick.

How long until they just blatantly start air striking entire states ya think?

8

Being AGAINST Fraud means NOT Taking Bribes! NOT giving Handouts to Illegal Immigrants that FIRED Hundreds of Thousands of Americans! NOT using Taxpayer Dollars on Vanity Projects! NOT giving my Friends Billions of Dollars in a Slush Fund! NOT giving Single moms Unemployment Benefits! And there's NO WAY this Backfires!

3

Loser loses a war and now the loser has to figure out how to pay for it.

Only fraud going on is coming from the White House.

3
lemmy.ca

Hahaha, do it. I'll get the pop corn.

2

Bro this is the most boring shit ever, trump does something crazy half the judges say it's fine half say it's not and we go back and forth until the next stupid scandal takes over the headlines

1
fedia.io

Kamala probably would have done the same thing, so we really didn't have a choice.

0

Harris would have started a war with Iran to boost her shitty poll numbers, gave them three hundred billion after losing that war then taken unemployment benefits to pay for it.

3

Based on what exactly? I don't care for her policies nor her as a person but explain the logic behind such a dumb statement

2
lemmy.wtf

Based on what exactly? I don't care for her policies nor her as a person but explain the logic behind such a dumb statement

1

Text is hard but this was pretty obviously sarcasm. Not enough vitriol to be genuine.

4
Lodespawnreply
aussie.zone

I can only assume you missed the loud WHOOOSH! as a giant s flew over your head ..

2
lemmy.wtf

Yeah maybe, last time I checked saracasm doesn't translate through text dumbass

-2
Trump threatens to pull unemployment benefits from all states for the first time in history | Spyke