If they really want to sell tickets for that UFC fight, they should make a couch shaped like a peacock and have Tate and Vance battle for the right to fuck it.
I always love when people make the connection with ducks for example. Like have you seen a female duck? Yeah they aren't as colorful, but their pattern is way more interesting and they are absolutely beatiful in their own right.
Also, idk, I think that what an ape thinks looks good has little bearing on what avians find attractive. For all we know male ducks think that bright plumage is unattractive.
Like for real, would parrots looking at us understand what we see in permanent large breasts? Or would they look at our other comically oversized sex characteristic (large, exposed penises without a baculum) as the primary showy mating display. Or would they see us as a species where sexual selection has resulted in both parties having a display to show off? Would they think that from their perspective it's obvious which looks better?
Wait, how does this work? I love big strong hairy men. Does this actually make me straight? How am I going to explain this to my mum after all these years
Guess they've never seen all of the statues of Athena, Artemis and Aphrodite. You don't get as many nude female statues because it was usually considered obscene for women to be naked in public.
But the Greek male statues were fully nude and depicted ripped mortal men because they were made in line with Aristotle's idea of good art being educational. Those were arguably the marble version of "git gud, scrub".
If there were more male "perfect" body statues at the time, which we can't establish because many have been lost over the millennia, it might actually be evidence that men were considered less attractive and they needed more body shaming to fix it?
Also they're depicted with small pps because that body part was associated with savagery iirc. If we had the same trend today they would probably all have underwear with a huge bulge because that's where puritanism and male beauty standards are currently.
The penis thing is pretty hotly debated, but savagery comes pretty close to my understanding of the theory you mention. It's not a hugely different concept from some of the manosphere stuff you find today though.
Basically the idea was (it's theorized) that thinking with your dick leads to making hasty and bad decisions, but you want to be like the cool smart intellectual philosopher rhetorician dudes ruling society who are strong enough to control their urges. You want to be the civilized powerful master strategist, not the uncivilized weak-willed destructive glutton. So... because art needs to be about reality and be educational (there's no place for that creative abstract shit), we're going to de-emphasize the body part associated with urges that are difficult to control. These are powerful rational dudes afterall.
The biggest difference with modern manosphere bullshit is maybe the part where they shrunk the pps on the ripped marble dudes to make that point. Instead we get... social media statue and peacock "science" analogies.
Phrasing. But yes, some of them - they seemed to prefer making plaster and metal fig leaves thankfully. Michelangelo wasn't thrilled about being told to change his work either. Some of them were whacked off earlier than the Catholics, and some were whacked off by the Vatican even as late as the 1850s in "The Great Castration".
Many of the lost appendages were accidental though, natural disasters and the like did a lot of amputation and decapitation, to the point where there are entire catalogue methods for mismatched heads on statues.
I think Nemesis is Roman, but probably a copy of a Greek statue. I might have chosen to forget because the "restoration" work on her head breaks my heart - but I know that's a common problem. Such a pity because the drapery is gorgeous.
Looking at this Diana/Artemis, who was much luckier than most statues by having her original head reattached, you can see how different it is. The proportions make much more sense.
Image text description below image:
Photo of a marble statue of Artemis (aka Diana), which lives at the Louvre. Artemis is mid-step reaching for an arrow in the quiver on her back. In her other hand she's pulling on the antlers of a small deer that she has caught. She's wearing a short and practical belted tunic (chiton) appropriate for hunting, functional sandals, and an equally pragmatic hairstyle with her wavy locks in an up-do. Her arms and legs are neither skinny nor super muscly, they're very average looking. But, being a goddess, she's got a tiara. Not an ostentatious tiara, a simple solid tiara. A utility tiara, if you will. And being a female goddess, you can still see her nips pushing on the intricate drapery of her chiton. She's clearly got some sex appeal carved in, but the statue is of a capable person who is independently getting shit done.
I love her because she basically looks like the kind of woman a modern conservative commentator would condemn for subverting gender roles. Also with a proportional head.
the hardest part of conservation is learning how to do it. like, i play saxophone and the instruments literally die and need expensive if you go too long without playing. how to take care of a sax? make sure your mouth is clean (like, rinse it out with water at least) before you play. ABSOLUTELY do not eat anything or drink anything other than water (not even flavored water bullshit) while playing unless you want to go brush your teeth before picking your sax up again. don't leave your spit swab in while it's in the case even though it fits so perfect in there, and play it regularly (like at least once a week but once a day is better) to make sure the cork doesn't literally die. so sax conservation boils down to playing often and keeping your mouth clean.
guess how i ruined my first sax dudes. it was not doing this shit above.
It's possible that it is a more modern idea that we've attributed to being much earlier, that does happen a lot, but I'm inclined to think it's not entirely baseless.
We know for example that the nude Aphrodite of Knidos by Praxiteles caused enough of a stir to become a tourist destination, and even she had a conveniently positioned hand covering her goods. Kore statues always had clothes on too, unlike their male counterparts.
I could maybe buy the possibility that almost all of the nude women sculptures were stolen and later destroyed, either intentionally or accidentally, but that doesn't quite work either. To not find any older nude sculptures in modern times, plus the odd detail that none of the nude ones we do have (copies, admittedly, and I don't know all the statues either) have anything other than Barbie-smooth instead of even a delicate line suggesting labia... seems odd for an art culture that progressively got more caught up with hyper realism.
They did get nuder and more realistic with time, but we've got nothing from the archaic period without at least a skirt on, usually more.
Can't say for sure. It wouldn't change that all these people are trash. Let's see, if true it's sad that their stuck in a world that tells them it's not on to be who they are. And thus feeling like being shit stains of a human is the better than loving the right person. If false someone else is lieing, these guys are horrible people, no lies necessary.
I thought the same thing, and tried to find the 2 replies. In the grand scheme of things, it does not matter though, because all three of these ghouls would say whatever gets more attention because they are amorphous blobs of shite.
There was a quote I saw recently that said something along the lines of the idea that if your satire becomes indistinguishable from that which you’re satirizing it ceases to be a joke and just becomes more fuel for your target.
During high school I was friend with a guy from a village known for their conservative takes. And while this guy certainly wasn't as left as some of my other friends, he liked to fuck with his football teammates by making the take that gay sex is manly.
Why? Because it involves two men. Hetero sex wasn't as manly because it involves a girl, and lesbian sex was as girly as it got. His teammates really didn't get that he was fucking with their worldview.
Now he definitely had very idiotic takes himself, but this one always stuck with me because it's just so easy to troll any insecure right winger with
As a lesbian I've definitely seen plenty of gay interactions that are so gendered that I feel most people of the other gender wouldn't be comfortable participating, especially conservative straight people. It's really funny to me how this stereotype of gay people as less gender conforming (while it absolutely carries a lot of truth to it) results in people not even considering that sometimes gay sex is just two really masculine men going at it in a manly way or two women being extremely feminine together.
Beefing is when you're getting fucked in the arse so hard that your partner manages to get some air up there, so you fart. Like queefing, but with none of that gay vagina stuff.
can't they finally just come out of the closet. Guys its 2026, its totally fine to be gay, no need to be a fascist idiot just because you're trying to hide that.
Is this real? Did asmongold really say "thats why women need makeup"? Women need makeup because there is an entire insldustry dedicated to making them feel bad about their looks so they can sell makeup that makes women feel better. The makeup cause damage to their skin that can only be covered up by more makeup. It is instilled in them from a young age and perpetuated by older generations influencing younger generations.
What am i saying. Of course he said that. He is a fucking moron.
I mean it's not like any of these men have ever listened to women, much less read any feminist theory with an open mind. And gods forbid they notice that unshaved women who don't wear makeup can be gorgeous.
It happens everywhere, but especially when blasting famous people, Lemmy is rife with AIgen / photoshop jokes. The whole "fucking women is gay" bit is a popular 4chan joke, so I feel fairly comfortable assuming this is a creative work.
These don't usually get me, but I constantly fall for the ones about fake technological advancements. I just want to believe!
Right, but worn by men and women alike. Makeup today is targeted at women and filled with harmful chemicals that close up the pores on your skin, cause greasy spotty skin that cracks with time and make makeup a necessity not a choice.
In fact in the victorian era it was widely regarded by both sexes to be Vulgar, primarily associated with sex workers.
It is a very recent thing that has pushed for marketing it at women specifically. Within Last 100 years or so. Especially post ww2.
I've heard something about the writers complaining that writing got more difficult because life was getting even weirder than the series or something like that.
There was that meme where a guy said he was the most straight person ever because in college, he blew a guy, and then had sex with him, and both times, he hated it.
So he was 100% confident that he was straight. So if you never had gay sex, you'll never know and so you're just a uncertain straight.
I mean, that kind of makes sense. I have tried with ladies and it really doesn't feel like sex, it's not off-putting, I could do it like a performance but it's not a turn on either. I don't think experimenting means you are bi.
Well he's part of a huge disinformation campaign funded by Palantir so his opinion about anything will be confusing & nonsense. In fact all of this is disinformation because one of Palantir's objectives is to reduce world population, and trying to turn everyone into homosexuals is one of their strategies.
You know around 20 years ago it was basically a crass joke/insult to just say that these kind of people are ... their entire personality is a performance to avoid confronting latent homosexual tendencies.
Me? Yeah, I'm bi, I kissed a dude and I liked it.
Maybe a little more than that eheheheh, ahem.
But I can also guarantee I'd fucked more women than Asmongold and Nick Fuentes, 100% guarantee. Individually, and also likely combined.
Maybe/hopefully not more than Tate as the dude is literally the master of a sex rape dungeon you're not allowed to leave.
... these fucking people.
These fucking people.
They're infinitely more gay than I am, Jesus fucking Christ.
Just... they're cult leaders of an anti-reality cult.
Gay is Straight, if you think about, bro.
... I want to tear these people apart, limb from limb.
Do they all just want to suck each other off? I mean fine if that's what you want to do but don't be hateful to everybody else because you're into it? Such weirdos
If you haven't noticed there's a huge agenda in the media (which is run by billionaire elites) to turn everyone into homosexuals in order to cull world population.
It's hard to believe only a few years ago, we had this concept known as "parody horizon". People used to say super wacky shit and you had to use your brain power to figure out if they were Beyond the Parody Horizon. Are they saying hilariously stupid shit for sarcasm points, or are they saying weird shit that is just telling?
Unfortunately, the horizon is dead. These people are just... too gone. They can say stupidly telling shit from time to time, but what the hell are we supposed to do about that? Nothing's gonna work.
Is he also calling all the men (main characters) sexy in videogames?
I saw a very insightful video about this topic.
Women apparently do not find these game characters sexy (nor gay men apparently) and then the straight men who think they are and strive to look that way will say that the women are laying.
That made me wonder who they want to impress, other men? Themselves? Or they are just in disbelief that they put so much work into something that only attracts other straight men?
I shouldn't take this serious but it is funnier that way haha
Honestly, that is just overcomplicating something very basic for the sake of polarization, views and manufactured rage. People want esthetically pleasing things, and that doesn't need to mean sexy.
Do I find some male videogame characters sexy? Yes, very. But most importantly, we just want our ape brains to go "Engagement and dopamine, yay".
Do men need to devote days to unlock mirror mode in the latest Mario Kart? Nope, but in a world this depressive and bleak it is an achievement, and sexy doesn't even factor there.
That made me wonder who they want to impress, other men?
Yes.
Fucking people and looking like you fuck people are two different categories, and frankly, women being allowed to choose the winners here has always been very frustrating for them.
But they don't. They don't get to choose how men want to look. And they don't choose who they like, this is something two people chooses. otherwise it's a serious crime.
Its just people and sometimes they are awful, sometimes they are great.
Culture also varies a lot in different countries or different regions even, and therefore also people and how they act and feel. It's quite possible you would vibe a lot better with men in another country. Something fresh and interesting and not so god damn boring. :)
I like Italian women for example, full of life. But not when they become fat. That's a big issue for me personally and it just kills attraction.
I think taking care of the body is essential, and if you don't, it will look like crap when you get older. I go to the gym and lift weights and its absolutely necessary to stay fit, in combination with eating food that is good for the body.
For sure. You can look good at 50 too, its just about how you eat and exercise and if you stare into screens all day.
Im 51 soon and I just did 60 min at the gym and then a 90 minute walk in the forest. Of course I dont have to work which makes it a lot easier. I was constantly tired when working and watched Netflix, ate bad food etc.
So its not about discipline, it's just about collecting money while working and then being able to stop working when you have enough. I worked 25 years. Felt like that was enough. :)
Huh. I have worked 40 years and raised a bunch of kids, not as much leisure but holding up fine. I do work at a sports company though, people take long lunches to go for a run and we have a gym too. So there is both the flexibility and resources to stay fit. Really nice perk.
Honestly don't mind working now, it was harder when I was younger with kids at home and not as much seniority at work.
Its ok to be more hot for men you don't have to perform a mental gymnastics excuse and cite biology man just lick dicks it is very easy to ask men for a lick
Tate looks like a potato you forgot in the back of a cabinet and started to grow
Don't insult the potatoes. You plant them and grow more potatoes.
Wtf does Tate have to offer?
To be fair Tate grew a lot more tates.
At least potatoes are nutritious and respect women.
Alright that's it, I'm calling his fans "taters" from now on
Boil em, mash em, stick em in a stew
Tater tots, has a ring to it.
Like the potato, if you plant him under the ground, the world becomes a better place.
You make an excellent point. We have never buried Tate underground to test this. Maybe he can do the same as the potato.
Let's at least give him reasonable doubt and bury him. Then after 3 or 4 months we'll have our answer
And risk he'll actually sprout and multiply?
To run a fair test, we need to divide a body into different sections each containing an eye. Or part of an eye.
potatoes are actually useful and quintessential
They are hardy and are a great source of starch. Love the potato.
Now you listen here! You got a problem with potatoes you got a problem with me and I suggest you let that one marinate
Marinate... In butter?
prostitution and sex trafficking. But besides that not much...
oh wait I forgot, he doesn't support the independence of women; just sex trafficking.
Tater
What's manosphere, precious?
"Your dad's a good wrestler. But I'm better."
"Human males are more attractive, look at peacocks"
"Also this isn't gay at all, just look at ancient Greece!"
I looked at all of them in the straightest of ways.
Rumour has it Tate fucked a peacock
allegedly
folks are saying it was a sick peacock
If they really want to sell tickets for that UFC fight, they should make a couch shaped like a peacock and have Tate and Vance battle for the right to fuck it.
I always love when people make the connection with ducks for example. Like have you seen a female duck? Yeah they aren't as colorful, but their pattern is way more interesting and they are absolutely beatiful in their own right.
Also, idk, I think that what an ape thinks looks good has little bearing on what avians find attractive. For all we know male ducks think that bright plumage is unattractive.
Like for real, would parrots looking at us understand what we see in permanent large breasts? Or would they look at our other comically oversized sex characteristic (large, exposed penises without a baculum) as the primary showy mating display. Or would they see us as a species where sexual selection has resulted in both parties having a display to show off? Would they think that from their perspective it's obvious which looks better?
Ducks think? Do they quack in their dreams?
Tate’s looking at cocks all right, someone are probably pea’in
"Human males are more attractive, look at cocks!"
It's not gay, it's science.
I find women so attractive that I don't care if they have a dick or not. Damn
💯
Guys, is it gay to be attracted to women?
very
Shit, I must be really gay then, because I like soft, cuddly women.
That’s so gay.
Wait, how does this work? I love big strong hairy men. Does this actually make me straight? How am I going to explain this to my mum after all these years
The post literally says so.
I asked 3 women in my vacinity abs they said "yes"... Maybe they're onto something 🤔
Depends, are you a woman?
Can't argue with the math
The Greeks invented sex but the Romans finetuned the concept by finding out you could also have sex with women.
The original copypasta uses "orgies". Since, you know, you can't invent something that has existed before even humans.
Dude I heard that joke in the 80s. There's a million variations.
Guess they've never seen all of the statues of Athena, Artemis and Aphrodite. You don't get as many nude female statues because it was usually considered obscene for women to be naked in public.
But the Greek male statues were fully nude and depicted ripped mortal men because they were made in line with Aristotle's idea of good art being educational. Those were arguably the marble version of "git gud, scrub".
If there were more male "perfect" body statues at the time, which we can't establish because many have been lost over the millennia, it might actually be evidence that men were considered less attractive and they needed more body shaming to fix it?
Also they're depicted with small pps because that body part was associated with savagery iirc. If we had the same trend today they would probably all have underwear with a huge bulge because that's where puritanism and male beauty standards are currently.
Also one of the most significant statues of that era is a female figure...
The penis thing is pretty hotly debated, but savagery comes pretty close to my understanding of the theory you mention. It's not a hugely different concept from some of the manosphere stuff you find today though.
Basically the idea was (it's theorized) that thinking with your dick leads to making hasty and bad decisions, but you want to be like the cool smart intellectual philosopher rhetorician dudes ruling society who are strong enough to control their urges. You want to be the civilized powerful master strategist, not the uncivilized weak-willed destructive glutton. So... because art needs to be about reality and be educational (there's no place for that creative abstract shit), we're going to de-emphasize the body part associated with urges that are difficult to control. These are powerful rational dudes afterall.
The biggest difference with modern manosphere bullshit is maybe the part where they shrunk the pps on the ripped marble dudes to make that point. Instead we get... social media statue and peacock "science" analogies.
Didn't the Vatican whack them all off with hammers?
Phrasing. But yes, some of them - they seemed to prefer making plaster and metal fig leaves thankfully. Michelangelo wasn't thrilled about being told to change his work either. Some of them were whacked off earlier than the Catholics, and some were whacked off by the Vatican even as late as the 1850s in "The Great Castration".
Many of the lost appendages were accidental though, natural disasters and the like did a lot of amputation and decapitation, to the point where there are entire catalogue methods for mismatched heads on statues.
I'm just thinking of the goonies. Oh no, the statue! Her favorite part!
If we had? We have sculptors. We have people making sculptures. You don't have to guess what they would make.. but yeah, it's bulges..
Don't forget nemesis:
I think Nemesis is Roman, but probably a copy of a Greek statue. I might have chosen to forget because the "restoration" work on her head breaks my heart - but I know that's a common problem. Such a pity because the drapery is gorgeous.
Looking at this Diana/Artemis, who was much luckier than most statues by having her original head reattached, you can see how different it is. The proportions make much more sense.
Image text description below image:
Photo of a marble statue of Artemis (aka Diana), which lives at the Louvre. Artemis is mid-step reaching for an arrow in the quiver on her back. In her other hand she's pulling on the antlers of a small deer that she has caught. She's wearing a short and practical belted tunic (chiton) appropriate for hunting, functional sandals, and an equally pragmatic hairstyle with her wavy locks in an up-do. Her arms and legs are neither skinny nor super muscly, they're very average looking. But, being a goddess, she's got a tiara. Not an ostentatious tiara, a simple solid tiara. A utility tiara, if you will. And being a female goddess, you can still see her nips pushing on the intricate drapery of her chiton. She's clearly got some sex appeal carved in, but the statue is of a capable person who is independently getting shit done.
I love her because she basically looks like the kind of woman a modern conservative commentator would condemn for subverting gender roles. Also with a proportional head.
Diane de Versailles - Louvre catalogue
Right they were "lost over time". You've got a bunch of ripped naked Greek guy statues in your basement don't you
I wish I had both any cool ancient things and any basement to put them in. I think the oldest thing I own is maybe 100 years at best.
I think I'd be terrified to own anything much older too, conservation is hard.
the hardest part of conservation is learning how to do it. like, i play saxophone and the instruments literally die and need expensive if you go too long without playing. how to take care of a sax? make sure your mouth is clean (like, rinse it out with water at least) before you play. ABSOLUTELY do not eat anything or drink anything other than water (not even flavored water bullshit) while playing unless you want to go brush your teeth before picking your sax up again. don't leave your spit swab in while it's in the case even though it fits so perfect in there, and play it regularly (like at least once a week but once a day is better) to make sure the cork doesn't literally die. so sax conservation boils down to playing often and keeping your mouth clean.
guess how i ruined my first sax dudes. it was not doing this shit above.
eh idk i'm pretty sure that's an opinion that started in england, much later, not in ancient greece
It's possible that it is a more modern idea that we've attributed to being much earlier, that does happen a lot, but I'm inclined to think it's not entirely baseless.
We know for example that the nude Aphrodite of Knidos by Praxiteles caused enough of a stir to become a tourist destination, and even she had a conveniently positioned hand covering her goods. Kore statues always had clothes on too, unlike their male counterparts.
I could maybe buy the possibility that almost all of the nude women sculptures were stolen and later destroyed, either intentionally or accidentally, but that doesn't quite work either. To not find any older nude sculptures in modern times, plus the odd detail that none of the nude ones we do have (copies, admittedly, and I don't know all the statues either) have anything other than Barbie-smooth instead of even a delicate line suggesting labia... seems odd for an art culture that progressively got more caught up with hyper realism.
They did get nuder and more realistic with time, but we've got nothing from the archaic period without at least a skirt on, usually more.
eh, check out these pictures
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khajuraho_Group_of_Monuments
india had them.
Sure, but they had an entirely different belief system, and those examples are up to a millennium later. Even the more voluptuous Graeco-Indian female statues from Gandhara got intricate drapery.
Would be funny if all this manosphere shit was just a ploy to turn more twinks gay, so Tate could finally have the harem of his dreams.
Is this actually for real?
Would it change your opinion of these weirdos?
Yes. To be clear, all this makes them even stranger (and deeper in the closet?) than I previously knew.
Wait til you read up on Groypers and 'operatives'.
So… it’s not then?
A deepened disdain is different from general disdain, curse of knowledge and all that.
Can't say for sure. It wouldn't change that all these people are trash. Let's see, if true it's sad that their stuck in a world that tells them it's not on to be who they are. And thus feeling like being shit stains of a human is the better than loving the right person. If false someone else is lieing, these guys are horrible people, no lies necessary.
https://xcancel.com/Asmongold/status/2060392930695643535
Too many replies to verify the other two.
I am pretty sure at least one of these is not in the same thread or they have been reordered
I thought the same thing, and tried to find the 2 replies. In the grand scheme of things, it does not matter though, because all three of these ghouls would say whatever gets more attention because they are amorphous blobs of shite.
There was a quote I saw recently that said something along the lines of the idea that if your satire becomes indistinguishable from that which you’re satirizing it ceases to be a joke and just becomes more fuel for your target.
Only 'cause those ones are lost.
During high school I was friend with a guy from a village known for their conservative takes. And while this guy certainly wasn't as left as some of my other friends, he liked to fuck with his football teammates by making the take that gay sex is manly.
Why? Because it involves two men. Hetero sex wasn't as manly because it involves a girl, and lesbian sex was as girly as it got. His teammates really didn't get that he was fucking with their worldview.
Now he definitely had very idiotic takes himself, but this one always stuck with me because it's just so easy to troll any insecure right winger with
As a lesbian I've definitely seen plenty of gay interactions that are so gendered that I feel most people of the other gender wouldn't be comfortable participating, especially conservative straight people. It's really funny to me how this stereotype of gay people as less gender conforming (while it absolutely carries a lot of truth to it) results in people not even considering that sometimes gay sex is just two really masculine men going at it in a manly way or two women being extremely feminine together.
Was he wrong though?
The "on average"-qualifier in there working like a lifeboat on a plane falling from the sky over the Sahara
Also
Does this man actually know what "gay" means?
I begin to think he means that in original meaning...
"I dumno which rapper is beefing with which other rapper because I am not happy"
"I agree man are more attractive on average because I am not happy"
I think he doesn't know what beefing means
Well.....maybe he just thinks "beefing" means shoving their beef stick intothe others man hole.
If he thinks thats what beefing is, I could see why he thinks it's gay.
I mean, he's wrong either way, but that would explain where his viewpoint is.
Beefing is when you're getting fucked in the arse so hard that your partner manages to get some air up there, so you fart. Like queefing, but with none of that gay vagina stuff.
Why does this sound plausible
Because I am an expert in these matters.
source: am expert
Hey that's not true you're a Bigfoot
The "it's not gay if you're the top" attitude seems surprisingly common.
Similar to "it's not gay if you are raping/penetrating"
Alpha version males are buggy and barely work. Kinda useless.
can't they finally just come out of the closet. Guys its 2026, its totally fine to be gay, no need to be a fascist idiot just because you're trying to hide that.
You can't be fascist and gay though! There lies their problem, and their audience.
Is this real? Did asmongold really say "thats why women need makeup"? Women need makeup because there is an entire insldustry dedicated to making them feel bad about their looks so they can sell makeup that makes women feel better. The makeup cause damage to their skin that can only be covered up by more makeup. It is instilled in them from a young age and perpetuated by older generations influencing younger generations.
What am i saying. Of course he said that. He is a fucking moron.
I mean it's not like any of these men have ever listened to women, much less read any feminist theory with an open mind. And gods forbid they notice that unshaved women who don't wear makeup can be gorgeous.
Why would you read something with an open mind that wasn’t written in good faith?
eh, not all of it is bad. early feminist literature was really good, it turned to shit when it got mainstream
I don't think so.
It happens everywhere, but especially when blasting famous people, Lemmy is rife with AIgen / photoshop jokes. The whole "fucking women is gay" bit is a popular 4chan joke, so I feel fairly comfortable assuming this is a creative work.
These don't usually get me, but I constantly fall for the ones about fake technological advancements. I just want to believe!
Dunce... makeup has existed for thousands of years
Right, but worn by men and women alike. Makeup today is targeted at women and filled with harmful chemicals that close up the pores on your skin, cause greasy spotty skin that cracks with time and make makeup a necessity not a choice.
In fact in the victorian era it was widely regarded by both sexes to be Vulgar, primarily associated with sex workers.
It is a very recent thing that has pushed for marketing it at women specifically. Within Last 100 years or so. Especially post ww2.
Who is the dunce?
Being gay is the manliest thing you can do
There is nothing as manly as gay sex.
It can only be performed by real men. If a women is involved, it isn't gay sex anymore.
If the sex is between two men and one woman, regardless of who is penetrating who than it is 66.66% gay.
And 100% hawt
I'd prefer two goth women dominating me. That would be awesome.
The Deep on “The Boys” wasn't as overblown as some people thought.
I've heard something about the writers complaining that writing got more difficult because life was getting even weirder than the series or something like that.
That's a dangerous level of internalized self-loathing repression
Tate knows this is nonsense. He gets more subscribers and more money every time there is outrage about something he said. Don't share.
Happy Pride, everyone!
Actually women are more attractive, especially to other women, it's science!
Our findings provide robust evidence for a gender attractiveness gap (GAP), with female faces rated more attractive than male faces across rater sexes, cultures, races and age groups. Surprisingly, the GAP is more pronounced among female raters, who rate other women substantially higher than male faces, while male faces receive similarly low ratings from both sexes
And yet WHEN I SAY it's weird for normal looking dudes to look like normal dudes deliberately, people get upset! It's objectively a bad look!
Matches my personal experience
Apparently being straight is gay lmfao
It's like an explanation of conservatism in one photo.
Well you know the old saying, "are you man enough to fuck another guy?"
There was that meme where a guy said he was the most straight person ever because in college, he blew a guy, and then had sex with him, and both times, he hated it.
So he was 100% confident that he was straight. So if you never had gay sex, you'll never know and so you're just a uncertain straight.
I mean, that kind of makes sense. I have tried with ladies and it really doesn't feel like sex, it's not off-putting, I could do it like a performance but it's not a turn on either. I don't think experimenting means you are bi.
Like my favorite video game says
This is huge if big
Actually, I'm pretty sure his is pretty small......wait, what are we talking about?
Pad kee mao keep up
Says the 3 ugliest people on the entire planet.
Just need clavicular to weigh in to complete the shitpile.
Well he's part of a huge disinformation campaign funded by Palantir so his opinion about anything will be confusing & nonsense. In fact all of this is disinformation because one of Palantir's objectives is to reduce world population, and trying to turn everyone into homosexuals is one of their strategies.
You can’t turn people into homosexuals 🙄you either are or aren’t.
No no... no.
This... no.
No no no no no, no.
This is waaaaay too on the nose.
You know around 20 years ago it was basically a crass joke/insult to just say that these kind of people are ... their entire personality is a performance to avoid confronting latent homosexual tendencies.
Me? Yeah, I'm bi, I kissed a dude and I liked it.
Maybe a little more than that eheheheh, ahem.
But I can also guarantee I'd fucked more women than Asmongold and Nick Fuentes, 100% guarantee. Individually, and also likely combined.
Maybe/hopefully not more than Tate as the dude is literally the master of a
sexrape dungeon you're not allowed to leave.... these fucking people.
These fucking people.
They're infinitely more gay than I am, Jesus fucking Christ.
Just... they're cult leaders of an anti-reality cult.
Gay is Straight, if you think about, bro.
... I want to tear these people apart, limb from limb.
I wish the Nazis would fuck each other and leave women alone. No really, you do you.
They just missed the fact that attractiveness is subjective.
Facts really aren’t their thing
More boobs for the rest of us I guess.
Now kiss.
Do they all just want to suck each other off? I mean fine if that's what you want to do but don't be hateful to everybody else because you're into it? Such weirdos
If you haven't noticed there's a huge agenda in the media (which is run by billionaire elites) to turn everyone into homosexuals in order to cull world population.
Least gay men on planet earth right here.
Satire?
Nope. 100% true. Those three in particular think cock is delicious.
/sI'm pretty sure that the Nazi at the bottom is gay, so you're not entirely wrong.
Edit: huh, he claims to be attracted to women, so I guess I'm wrong there.
pretty sure your intuition is correct tho
I can't tell if this is true, but I can believe it being true, which I find sad.
Big macho incels dream of peen.
The pinnacle of conservative values
Once again I'm reading something about these chuds and drowning in Poe's law
They really do be like that, no Poe needed.
It's hard to believe only a few years ago, we had this concept known as "parody horizon". People used to say super wacky shit and you had to use your brain power to figure out if they were Beyond the Parody Horizon. Are they saying hilariously stupid shit for sarcasm points, or are they saying weird shit that is just telling?
Unfortunately, the horizon is dead. These people are just... too gone. They can say stupidly telling shit from time to time, but what the hell are we supposed to do about that? Nothing's gonna work.
Not one person in the conversation has seen a naked woman, or regularly uses soap.
Andrew Tate is a convicted sex trafficker (of women). I'm pretty sure he's seen a naked woman.
Never seen a naked woman consensually*
The horseshoe theory of heterosexuality.
When your heterosexuality score causes a buffer overflow
Is he also calling all the men (main characters) sexy in videogames?
I saw a very insightful video about this topic.
Women apparently do not find these game characters sexy (nor gay men apparently) and then the straight men who think they are and strive to look that way will say that the women are laying.
That made me wonder who they want to impress, other men? Themselves? Or they are just in disbelief that they put so much work into something that only attracts other straight men?
I shouldn't take this serious but it is funnier that way haha
It's the sexy voice actors
Honestly, that is just overcomplicating something very basic for the sake of polarization, views and manufactured rage. People want esthetically pleasing things, and that doesn't need to mean sexy.
Do I find some male videogame characters sexy? Yes, very. But most importantly, we just want our ape brains to go "Engagement and dopamine, yay".
Do men need to devote days to unlock mirror mode in the latest Mario Kart? Nope, but in a world this depressive and bleak it is an achievement, and sexy doesn't even factor there.
Stares into mirror at Gordon Freeman goatee and fake glasses that I wear everyday.
Yes.
Fucking people and looking like you fuck people are two different categories, and frankly, women being allowed to choose the winners here has always been very frustrating for them.
But they don't. They don't get to choose how men want to look. And they don't choose who they like, this is something two people chooses. otherwise it's a serious crime.
Nah. You're gay.
Andrew Tate: "Having sex with women is for total homosexuals.
Me? As a true gangsta that I am, I give and take it up the ass.
I may be known here as Top G but in my cell in Romania I am known as the Bottom G."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhgLyvP0Y5A
Someone's in denial.
Why is this a shitpost? Is it fake?
Wait isnt it lesbian to be attracted to woman?
For those who thought cis men could never qualify as traps
If Blowfly were still with us he'd say that's what your bussy's made for
lolwut
To me it varies by age group.
Women are the prettiest in their 20-30th and men are their best looking in their 30th-50th. Men gain a lot of character by aging a little bit.
Its also common that women are attracted to older men, and men are attracted to younger women.
Seems natural and driven by biology.
Huh. I'm a straight lady but feel the opposite - as I get older I really wish I was bi, women around here hold up so much better than men.
I've met women who can turn a man gay too. :)
Its just people and sometimes they are awful, sometimes they are great.
Culture also varies a lot in different countries or different regions even, and therefore also people and how they act and feel. It's quite possible you would vibe a lot better with men in another country. Something fresh and interesting and not so god damn boring. :)
I like Italian women for example, full of life. But not when they become fat. That's a big issue for me personally and it just kills attraction.
I think taking care of the body is essential, and if you don't, it will look like crap when you get older. I go to the gym and lift weights and its absolutely necessary to stay fit, in combination with eating food that is good for the body.
I agree with that last paragraph. Am more than half a century old and it really becomes apparent who takes care of themselves.
For sure. You can look good at 50 too, its just about how you eat and exercise and if you stare into screens all day.
Im 51 soon and I just did 60 min at the gym and then a 90 minute walk in the forest. Of course I dont have to work which makes it a lot easier. I was constantly tired when working and watched Netflix, ate bad food etc.
So its not about discipline, it's just about collecting money while working and then being able to stop working when you have enough. I worked 25 years. Felt like that was enough. :)
Huh. I have worked 40 years and raised a bunch of kids, not as much leisure but holding up fine. I do work at a sports company though, people take long lunches to go for a run and we have a gym too. So there is both the flexibility and resources to stay fit. Really nice perk.
Honestly don't mind working now, it was harder when I was younger with kids at home and not as much seniority at work.
Yeah sounds like a good job for sure. :)
Its ok to be more hot for men you don't have to perform a mental gymnastics excuse and cite biology man just lick dicks it is very easy to ask men for a lick
Asmongold trolling all sides never gets old.
Which sides is he trolling here? Who are the victims?