Spyke
feddit.uk

Yeah, it a temporary measure due to people leaving. Microsoft will not change. Linux is far better

117
ColeSlothreply
discuss.tchncs.de

I have one gaming PC and it's on windows 10 till kike October or so of this year when security updates go away. Waiting to see if steam OS officially drops for PC so I don't have to switch OS more than once. Already have it running on amd processor and GPU for an easy Linux switch, and been running Linux on my laptop for a while now.

8
JoshCodesreply
programming.dev

I really do suggest using Bazzite if you don't want to wait for steamOS.

I previously used Mint, haven't had to install an nvidia graphics driver or new kernel since moving to Bazzite and I'm now learning distrobox so I can make my usual bad computing decisions in a safe space. Its a very stable base, and with container tech layered on, you can have all the fuck around you want with minimal find out.

5
sopuli.xyz

Is it true? I've been lately looking out for a new atomic distro but I've heard it seems it's not developer friendly with the sandboxing and extra efforts to get apt/rpm working. I am relatively new to Linux and stuck with Mint for now so I can't add anything to it.

0

Depends what you want to do.

On distrobox, I installed a containerised version of Ubuntu that can interact with my host, sort of like WSL on windows. Anything I put in it remains isolated so I can't install packages that break my system - and I can use apt to install whatever in want rather than rpm.

You could develop in a VM or container like distrobox, and tbh, the host can be whatever you need it to be. You dont actually have to move off Mint.

That being said, I dont see why you couldn't just develop on Bazzite/atomic distros of your choice using flatpaks for IDEs. I believe it has c++ installed and you'd be able to layer whatever language you needed onto your atomic distro of choice.

2
Katana314reply
lemmy.world

This has been a common sentiment, enough that I've thought of making a video about it.

Running a desktop OS, catering to everything people need from their PC, from printing to fringe drivers to VPNs to package management, is a big task. I have long doubted that Valve is personally interested in taking on that task. They write SteamOS for the deck and machine, since their only real responsibility is playing games. People who try to install that OS for other things will see some Flatpak friction - but that's fine, it wasn't built for that.

I'd strongly recommend looking at some other distributions with broader group support. My recommendation is CachyOS. Bazzite has worked great for others, but as a general desktop user I sort of bounced off of it - installing some unusual apps ended up getting a lot of friction against its emulation layers. I believe both are based off the same sort of origins as SteamOS, so that may be the safest thing.

3

I think you personally don't know what you're talking about and are just guessing at what Valve wants.

If we're speculating, I'll speculate that you're completely wrong and that most things that are up and running on Arch are going to run on SteamOS. GabeN has dumped a massive amount of time and effort into making Linux Arch viable and good for gaming. He also has enough clout that it will quickly become the most popular distro, or at least one of the most popular. To say it won't get much compatibility for things like printer drivers is just silly.

1
20dogsreply
feddit.uk

If it has an AMD GPU you can just install it now, no waiting. But it's not good at much more than just playing games, if you want a more general purpose machine I'd install something mainstream like Mint, Ubuntu or Fedora.

2

It does have amd, but I'm in no big hurry. Couple online games I won't be playing after the windows dump and I'm not interested in dual booting. I have a laptop running Linux for work\office things already. The desktop is just gaming and media.

1

Best comment.

I am very thankful to Microsoft, without them I wouldn't have made the switch to Linux.

I really loving it. So much better, faster and powerful + no Spying.

46
cabbagereply
piefed.social

When I started using Linux in 2009 it had around 0.6 percent market share on desktop. Windows had 95%.

Today Windows is measured below 68%, and Linux has been measured above 4% by statcounter.com.

These things move faster the more people make the change. Linux only reached 1% in 2013, 2% in 2021, 3% in 2023, and 4% was somehow first measured already in 2024. For every single person making the switch it becomes easier for others to do the same, and companies consider Linux support to be a little bit more important. One can only wonder at which percentage of market share it will be offered as a mainstream alternative when buying a new computer, but it seems pretty clear that we're getting there.

I guess my point is that we all won when you ditched Windows. Thanks for that.

34
glimsereply
lemmy.world

10% market share is when I expect it to be impossible to ignore and I think we're gonna get there fast like you alluded to.

But...mainly for games. The corporate crowd will stay on Windows because they benefit from propping up other corporations. PC/laptop manufacturers will still push Windows for the same reason

27

I don't understand how my coworkers are using windows. Like, they routinely have issues where it randomly reboots or gets sluggish. And it's just flat out unfit for software development, unless you're targeting windows specific stuff. They can't even run our code locally.

Maybe some of the problems are janky security stuff to try to lock it down

12
Buelldozerreply
lemmy.today

The corporate crowd will stay on Windows because they benefit from propping up other corporations.

I wouldn't be so sure. An interesting indicator of the shift that many of you wouldn't see is how many vendors of management and security software have put out Linux versions in the past 12 months. I'm talking about stuff like RMM (Remote Monitoring & Management), EDR / MDR (Endpoint Detection & Response / Managed Detection & Response) client side DNS filtering software, and other things.

This tooling is for managing and securing endpoints used by companies, either by internal IT or by MSPs. These vendors wouldn't be making and releasing these tools unless they were being asked for them AND there was going to be stead long term demand.

Turns out that once a companies stuff is in the cloud its users really don't need MS Windows anymore so as long as you can centrally manage and secure it Linux makes a perfectly fine endpoint OS.

11
piefed.ca

There is one last major bit once you have RMM and EDR in place - centralized identify. Until Okta, Ping, Azure, and Google all have a pam module that allows for remote identity management without depending on LDAP, enterprise endpoints are restricted to desktop/server machines (or orgs where you can get a waiver and only have local login).

6
Buelldozerreply
lemmy.today

Yep but...

Here's Microsoft - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/identity/devices/sso-linux?tabs=debian-install%2Cdebian-update%2Cdebian-uninstall

Google has a variety of IDM methods including Ubuntu Authd and Secure Cloud LDAP. There's also 3rd party tools like JumpCloud, ScaleOrange, etc.

Okta appears to have ASA and OPA although I'm not familiar with either of them. Ping has PingID and Ping Federate, although again I haven't used either of them.

So depending on your cloud and needs the IdM / IAM is either available NOW or it will be very soon. 😀

4
piefed.ca

Ohh that's super exciting. I haven't realized Microsoft made one.

Okta's offering was garbage last I attempted to poke it. And 3rd party IAM tooling can be completely hit or miss (and let's not even start about LDAP over the web...)

4

I dunno if it's exciting but I do have and use an Entra joined and InTune managed Linux Mint laptop with a full security stack loaded as described above. It works.

1
Riskablereply
programming.dev

Total market share is irrelevant. What matters more is total users.

If you make a product and there's a million people on a platform who could buy it, the costs to port that product (and support it) need to be low for it to be worthwhile.

If the total number of people on that platform increases to 10 million, now the cost to port/support becomes more like a minuscule expense rather than a difficult decision.

When you reach 100 million there's no excuse. There's a lot of money to be made!

For reference, the current estimated amount of desktop Linux users globally is somewhere between 60-80 million. In English-speaking countries, the total is around 19-20 million.

It's actually a lot more complicated than this, but you get the general idea: There's a threshold where any given software company (including games) is throwing money away by not supporting Linux.

Also keep in mind that even if Linux had 50% market share, globally, Tim Sweeney would still not allow Epic to support it. I bet he'd rather start selling their own consoles that run Windows instead!

5

For reference, the current estimated amount of desktop Linux users globally is somewhere between 60-80 million. In English-speaking countries, the total is around 19-20 million.

That sounds about right when comparing Microsoft's claim of "1 billion" Windows devices. 5% of a billion is 50 million(not a perfect comparison as 5% Linux is total including MacOS/others from statcounter but you get the idea). So 50 million to 100 million Linux users globally sounds about right.

2

Some OEMs with some models here in the USA also offer it. HP and Dell offer it. I think Dell gives Fedora and Ubuntu? And it takes off ~$130 USD or so from the price, so it's the full Windows license cost.

Personally if I have that option I'm taking it and just reinstalling whatever I want anyway, but it's nice having that option.

Also if I'm going to spend $2k+ on a new laptop and they don't give me a non-Windows/blank OS option then I'd go to support and request a special product link. Otherwise I'll find another brand or buy used.

7
jdr8reply
lemmy.world

Tuxedo laptops seem like they have a solid build.

Nice design and I think they are based in Germany.

They even provide their own OS which is based on Ubuntu.

6
addiereply
feddit.uk

Yes, very happy with mine. Started it up to see the preinstalled version of Linux and then restarted it to install Arch btw instead, but it's a great wee machine, exactly what I wanted and will be replacing it with another like it when the time comes.

6

My M1 MacBook Air is still alive and kicking (although I dislike being an American brand - bought it before the whole American mess).

But if I was in the market looking for a laptop, definitely would be a Tuxedo.

3

I had no idea - that's really cool!

Germans also seem to be privacy oriented people, I can imagine this combined with recent developments could have a real impact.

3

It will be really interesting to see the figures at the end of 2026, when Windows 10 has truly reached end of life, and a whole bunch of people are going to be forced to choose.

2
artyomreply
piefed.social

I wish you were right, but that growth does not appear fast nor steady.

-2
cabbagereply
piefed.social

0 to 1 percent: 22 years
1 to 2 percent: 8 years
2 to 3 percent: 2 years
3 to 4 percent: more unstable, but between 1 and 3 years

I would say it's an encouraging trend.

14

I had the opposite take as that guy. I already knew that Linux usage in desktops was growing, but I'm pleasantly surprised seeing the dramatic acceleration behind it! I'm being optimistic here, but we could reach the point that we start going up a percentage point in a matter of months in the next few years.

6

I switched to Linux in December, and it was a remarkable feeling. I don't think I had really noticed how oppressive or depressive Windows had become (and I hadn't even switched to Win 11, just using win 10), or how much I was actually personally affected by, but that feeling of suddenly being free when I booted up my linux was quite surprising and exhilarating.

It was like a massive weight had been lifted off of my shoulders.

2
lemmy.world

The title of the article is very misleading. Microsoft has not said they'll be removing AI features already deployed on Windows. All it says is they're reevaluating AI features going forward and streamlining the experience whatever that means. It sounds like they're looking to rename unpopular unwanted feature like Recall instead of scrapping it. The whole thing is just a PR move to placate the disgruntled masses. Also they said nothing about intrusive ads, telemetry, or rapidly declining stability of overall system. Recent update literally broke windows explorer, task bar and start menu. One thing for certain, Microsoft will not stop using Copilot to develop their software in house. That would be admitting Ai tools are useless and that would sink Microsoft stock even further than it already has.

179

You mean a company founded on lies, by a good friend of Epstein, is misleading the public! It's not like he's trying to treat us for his std...

26
Kissakireply
feddit.org

Honestly it's good engineering practice to not be stuck in your own product.

You want them to be using only copilot?

3
lemmy.zip

It's amazing that America somehow is destroying trust in itself from so many different directions right now, almost seems like a planned demolition, but I think it's more of a chaotic tragedy of errors due to horrible judgement. It's like the whole country got drunk on "American exceptionalism" (ie hubris) over the last 20 years, and here comes the hangover of the century.

38
hectorreply
lemmy.today

It was absolutely planned, if not expressly planned for destroying trust. Planned for maximizing revenue, minimizing costs, for oppressing and dividing the population to exploit them and prevent a challenge to their corrupt systems, and so forth.

22
lemmy.zip

Thinking all of that can be controlled would fall under hubris IMO. The powers have done nothing but stoke resistance and rebellion against their hierarchies, or perhaps I'm just taking the bait...?

10
Doomsiderreply
lemmy.world

Reading too much into it. It is simply their self-interest (the wealthy) conflicts with your self-interest. They are just grabbing as much money as they can and creating as many distractions along the way to confuse and obfuscate.

6
Soupreply
lemmy.world

I think you over-estimate the wealthy. These aren’t terribly intelligent people, they just have enough money to force what they want. The other commenter is correct, it’s largely just hubris and them believing they’re gods because they had the money things that aren’t terribly complicated but are otherwise out of reach for normal people. Everything they do that’s a trick is only clever to to those who are easily fooled. No one intelligent is confused, they just lack power to do anything especially with so many of the aforementioned fools supporting the rich.

10

I think this is it.

I think, for example, that a lot of the conspiracy theories that exist around 9/11 being planned from the "inside" are the actual conspiracy that's meant to mask the fallibility of the ruling class by creating stories about them being all powerful in the wake of a weakening attack.The one complex thing the rich do have the power to control is the stories we're told. The stories we internalize establish our place in the world and convince us of our rolls. They project a virtual reality of illusions around us, through algorithms and media, because "control is an illusion" is a double entedre.

4

Also there's a big part of this that is intentional sabotage and manipulation by a wide network of chaos-creators that mostly seem to lead back to Putin. When a former-KGB kleptocrat steals and controls everything in the world's largest country and becomes effectively probably one of the world's richest men, and then starts playing 4d chess with all the world's other richest men, I guess it turns out you can probably cause a lot of chaos and quite possibly completely destroy the international global order.

I'm willing to bet that is one of Putin's goals, but it's not his only goal, and just because he's evidently accomplished it with gusto still doesn't mean Putin is actually capable of accomplishing all his other goals of building or being part of any sort of new world order, because this chaos only destroys and tears things down. He's got destruction down to a science, and I'm sure he thinks he can leverage that to create what he wants in the world, but he's failed at that and will continue to fail. But he has proven he can fuck things up pretty badly for the rest of us, whether we want to admit it or not, so, personally I'm willing to give him credit where credit is due.

The real question is, are we going to accept that what came before is irretrievably broken, and if we are willing to do that, what are we going to build in its place? Because with chaos comes opportunity, but those opportunities are few and limited. The chaos will continue, and the chaos can worsen. Significantly. If we're going to turn this around, we have to be smart about it. There are a lot of paths that lead to very bad places, and only a few that have good endings. And you'd better believe that Putin and other forces of chaos are still going be trying to sabotage those too, even more aggressively as they realize their own dreams will never come to fruition.

I think we've got to start by rooting out all the elements of corruption that have allowed this to happen, or else anything we try to build in its place will be built on quicksand. What exactly those are? I have a bunch of opinions, but that's where the debate will start to happen, and I think we're going to need to start having those conversations before we can really address this. We need to establish our philosophical foundations and values, agree that we all value human life, that we value all lived human experiences, and that all humans are created equal, and I think we can go from there to try to define and refine exactly what those things mean and how we're going to implement those values into building a civilization that we actually want to live in and that other people want to live in too, where we can all agree on these things and find ways to pursue equality and happiness for all.

6
orclevreply
lemmy.world

It's not the whole country, it's the perfect storm of the absolute worst people who spent the last few decades working to seize power combined with the death throws of late stage capitalism. The political and economic elite in America (and most other countries) have merged and corrupted each other beyond redemption, but the ultra capitalist systems of the US means there are few if any effective checks to their power. In a properly functioning country the government checks the power of corporations via regulations and laws and in turn is checked by the will of the public but in the US the incessant corporate propaganda has convinced a depressingly large chunk of the population that government regulations are inherently bad and that everything works better when corporations are free to do whatever they want. That combined with the absolutely blatant bribery and corruption in US politics means that corporations control the US government rather than the other way around.

The whole thing worked for a little while while the corporations were at least pretending to somewhat care about consumers and things like anti-monopoly regulations, but now that Trump has shown the government is very loudly and publicly for sale to the highest bidder they've all gone mask off and are just doing whatever they want. The problem of course is that they're also run by morons that either don't see the cliff they're all collectively racing towards or just don't care because they're planning to bail out with all the profits while the greater US economy burns.

Ultimately this is the sprouting of the seed that was planted back in the 50s from an amalgam of the cold war anti-communism propaganda and the latent racism that was never properly dealt with following the civil war.

10
lemmy.zip

I'm Canadian. When we say "Americans" or "America" we mean people from the US.

2

History shows Americans will.

They trusted Microsoft after they were successfully sued by a DoJ (when it used to investigate corruption and monopolies) for being dicks, but David boies rejected breaking up the company in 2001.

0
ramble81reply
lemmy.zip

“Windows Personal Assistant Control (WPA Supplicant)” - don’t forget you need the WPA supplicant enabled to connect to the network!

4
ramble81reply
lemmy.zip

I know. I was making a joke that they would purposely obfuscate an existing acronym to try to confuse people into using it.

7
lemmy.world

As usual with all of these companies: only believe when you see the changes

68

As usual with any company, fuck em! They only care about bleeding you of your wealth, not making the world a better place. They can eat shit and die.

11
lemmy.ml

Won? They will do it again. The only winning move is not to play their game. Choose Free Software.

61
poopkinsreply
lemmy.world

Genuine question: What do you recommend? I want to replace Windows 10 on a 8-year-old midrange laptop with something that works reasonably well in terms of performance with a connected 4K monitor.

I've already tried Ubuntu, but unfortunately the experience has been marred by bugs such as poor performance, visual glitches, windows jumping around when attempting to move them, and DPI settings not being able to be applied per screen.

10

Linux is definitely the route. A lot of people use Mint or Ubuntu. But they are usually running out of date drivers.

I'd recommend looking into distros based on Fedora Workstation. It stays up to date but not as much as Arch so that it's stable.

My recommendation is any of the Universal Blue images that fit your need. They are based off of the Fedora Atomic image with added quality of life features.

10

I've had more luck with Mint, thanks to its Windows-adjacent GUI and user-friendly on ramp. Still encountered a few issues (a couple of peripherals that didn't support Linux drivers). But on the whole, it's improved system performance over Win10 and synced smoothly with my workstation.

6
aussie.zone

If you identify your laptop (including model number) someone who has the same hardware might be able to make a solid recommendation.

6

I can't say I've had those issues myself, so my recommendation may not be valid in your case. I'd say maybe give Fedora with KDE Plasma a try, and try switching between X11 and Wayland sessions if issues persist.

I personally don't like Ubuntu, but that's mostly because of Canonical making the occasional sketchy decision.

On the whole, distro choice doesn't matter quite as much these days, as most distros should work fine out of the box. Whatever issues you have should technically be solvable with a bit of troubleshooting.

Sometimes Linux just doesn't play well with your setup. Good luck, and I hope you find something that works for you!

5

I am more impressed you got windows 10 to work well on 8 year old computers ngl. I had an HP pavillion around that age and it had torturingly low startup speed.

Definetely try mint-cinnamon and mint-xfce4, latter one uses xfce4 which has very good performance.

A lot of experienced users will find linux run without bugs for them but that's because it's an OS that gets better as you learn more.

In my case battery life was 2 hours on windows and 1.5 hours on linux. But once I past the skill-curve I tweaked it to be 6 hours because I knew how to find what caused the problem and fix it.

Either that or there is the IT-guy effect going on where once an experienced user shows up the aura just makes computers work normal again lmao.

2
lemmy.zip

Modern corpo playbook.

  1. Go too far with something wildly unpopular on purpose
  2. Everyone complains
  3. Dial it back slightly
  4. "We won!"
56
lemmy.world

They keep claiming that and then proceeding anyways with maybe a short period of backtracking. I'll believe them when they've actually stayed backed off until the end of the ai bs. That said I'm never going back. I switched to Linux over 2 years ago in part because of the initial recall scandal.

43

Same here. Switched to Mint, now on Fedora. I've gotten used to the ecosystem and I much prefer it to Windows. Will never go back now.

12

Yeah this is what these companies do every time they get some heat. They never actually listen and fix their shit, they just back off and wait a couple of months until people are outraged about something else, then add it back in when they think nobody's looking. Rinse and repeat until everyone's too sick of hearing about it/tired of fighting it to continue.

6
sh.itjust.works

I am kinda glad they went to shit so quickly. If it were slow, I probably would never have gone fully Linux. Now, I have all 5 of my machines free of corporate spyware. I am having fun again configuring and learning. Thanks microslop! I needed the push.

40
Boshtreply
lemmy.world

Which distro has been working well for you? So for I have Mint and Bazzite on my list to try. Also do you have any pointers?

3
Pofskireply
lemmy.world

I'm using mint and loving the experience so far. My kids find it easy to use and even my wife, who was a bit worried having to switch to a new environment, came to realise that it works just as well if not better then windows.

8
sh.itjust.works

I use Mint on my laptops and I know it is not for everyone, but I started with Debian stable on my gaming desktop with an ARC B580 and upgraded the kernel, installed drivers, and added packages one at a time so I could see the difference. Debian stable on my server for many years, so I have some experience.

3
Boshtreply
lemmy.world

What makes you say Mint isn't for everyone? UI is weird?

2

Oh, I think Mint is one of the most accessible distros. I use Cinnamon desktop environment and that is very nice for new users. I was referring to starting with Debian stable, it is pretty baseline with no frills. Great for a server, but you will need to research what additional packages and repositories you want to get from it what you want. I just like how almost all software made for Linux has instructions for installing on Debian, that is not the case for most other distros.

2

I'm using CachyOS currently. It's fast, so far stable and suits me.

Best pointer I can give you loads them all onto a USB with Ventoy and test them all on the live environment. What works for others may not work for you so go ham, break shit and have fun while exploring

3
lemmy.today

Fedora workstation can be a real nice no trouble install.

Personally love to add pop-shell extension to GNOME - if you use big monitors, it's an awesome autotiler.

3

Good info as I have a huge monitor and has been part of my worry from a compatibility standpoint.

4
lemmy.zip

"Microsoft is walking back Windows 11’s AI overload — scaling down Copilot and rethinking Recall in a major shift" For Now.

Give them 6-8 months, they'll shove it back in quietly in a way you can't see it happening as easily.

37
tiramichureply
sh.itjust.works

Absolutely.

This just means "We pushed our crap too fast and people noticed, so we're letting things cool off slightly to quiet down the critics, and next time we'll boil the frog more slowly."

13
toynbeereply
lemmy.world

I think you've just neatly summarized, uh ...

... The world (such as we've incentivized it, anyway).

5
tiramichureply
sh.itjust.works

Sadly, yes.

What it comes down to is that any product or service with a profit incentive will inevitably betray you, no matter how good or how well-intentioned it started out.

Our only saviour is open source, self hosting, and federation.

It's why ownership rather than rental is the model we should all individually be pursuing.

7

Prolific cannibal promises to review their choice in seasonings to be more tactful as they continue to feast on PC users' privacy, freedom and last scraps of digital dignity on a global scale.

I am sure that this empty promise of change has everything to do with their user empathy and absolutely nothing to do with their recent financial results which indicated how hollow their AI-slop-bullshit revenue growth was last quarter.

34

The only thing they're rethinking is how to repackage this so people accept it. They learned a lot from this, but I promise you it wasn't the right lesson.

33

According to people familiar with Microsoft’s plans

Might as well get your information from psychedelic mushrooms.

30

Understand that they're not doing this because of user feedback; they're doing this because shareholders got cold feet about the whole thing after the backlash (so indirectly it's still down to user feedback, but not really)

30
lemmy.zip

Stop using Windows any, it's a US company that's too large.

29
Katana314reply
lemmy.world

I mean by that logic, stop using Steam. It's (marginally) possible for a company to get big, and not do terrible things. Just keep an eye on them and don't become fully reliant on them.

3

And we should be wary of steam, or keep at least an eye out for dark patterns. Fortunately Steam is doesn't have to listen to shareholders, this might be a reason why they don't do those things, but that could all change if Gabe isn't there anymore.

1
pawb.social

I haven't won until Microslop is a company that is used in past tense.

26

Forever will be microslop. Scaling back doesn't mean removing. It's still essentially malware.

24
lemmy.world

Thats bad actually, the free advertising to linux was a good thing. Now Windows users will slip back into apathy.

23
lemmy.world

Windows will continue to degrade as Microsoft fires more of its professional staff and turns to "Vibes Coding" for increasingly delicate systems development. They'll keep pushing out the OS as a vector for unwanted third-party advertisements. They'll keep ratcheting user control of the OS away from the hardware owners. And they'll keep injecting bloatware into their applications and services.

This isn't the end of enshitification. It is a brief retreat and regrouping by a company that has invested tens of billions of dollars into the AI sunk cost.

10
Authreply
lemmy.world

I hope you're right because I am enjoying Microsoft's failures and I would like them to continue.

3

I wish these were proper failures. They're such an entrenched monopoly, a whole lot would have to change before a $3.2T company sees any kind of tangible penalties.

4

I wouldn't call this a victory. I'd call this a "re-evaluation". they've invested way too much into AI/LLMs to simply drop it because users don't like any of it. They're simply going to pivot and come at this shit from a different angle.

23
Dozzi92reply
lemmy.world

The piece of nuance every one of these threads seems to miss. I have software that literally only runs on windows. What do? Rather than talk about how to make Windows work better, the best you get is jump ship!

4
Holytimesreply
sh.itjust.works

Because the concept of make windows work better is a fallacy. You, me and everyone has no control or ability to do that. It's not a real option to anyone.

The only people that can do it are Microsoft themselves. So you get what you get. Either windows is EXACTLY what you want and your ok with that or you jump ship.

Those are your options.

3
Dozzi92reply
lemmy.world

Except that's not true. The little tweaks, remove onedrive, turn off copilot, use powertoys to reprogram the Copilot key to right control. Little, useful tips to improve user experience.

And the thing is, it's something we've been doing for as long as I can remember. I remember screwing around with windows 98 to improve my experience. It's been a fact of life with windows, and it's fine.

1
Katana314reply
lemmy.world

It maybe used to be more true, but these days even when someone posts a decent guide on de-bloating Windows, it can A) Miss something critical, leaving spyware telemetry running, or B) Become out of date one month later when a Windows Update manually re-enables all the things you turned off.

I would've appreciated it when I was on Windows, but now? I'm kind of just happy not to be constantly fighting my OS on things, even if I do get compatibility annoyances.

4

I appreciate what you're saying. I will agree 100% it's gotten worse. I use it because I have a software that will never work on anything else, and a piece of hardware that only has drivers for windows.

I just find the argument to be disingenuous that Linux is this - to use the Ron Popwil catchphrase - set it and forget it OS. And I'm not suggesting you made that, but I see it often.

And so because I'm stuck with my work software (which I will use until I die because retirement isn't real), I just don't feel like going over to Linux is going to somehow better my life. I get along more than fine on Windows, same as I always have. I do get the itch to try Linux though, just to see, and so the constant bombardment here on Lemmy might be working. I did try Red Hat briefly 20+ years ago, but that's about the limit of my experience. I wanted to take over a MUD that had gone extinct.

1
feddit.nl

Too little too late. I'm already over to Linux now. Shit's been going downhill even before this whole AI craze went off the rails. I hope Microsoft Windows crashes and burns

21

It mostly looks like a mild slow down of user-facing release and rebrand of unpopular features.

It is not a retreat. The marketing team is just trying to figure out how to reframe things that caused public backlash.

20

Oh, and only now am I re-reading it to see that's not what it actually said...

3

Windows is still constantly tracking you and stealing your data. If you trust MS at this point, that mistake is on you.

18

Na that’s ok. I’m happy now with Linux. I’ve adapted. And now I’m thriving. Game surveys will be happily filled out to up that statistic of Linux use. Windows can take a miserable dive off a cliff while riddled with Russian STDs.

16
lemmy.ca

According to the headline, all they're saying is, "we will bother you less (the degree of which, we aren't clear), and we'll maybe think about what to do with recall."

14

And we will start pushing it again in six months time when people have forgot about now.

5

No one's fucking asking for AI except other corporations. It's a very industry based circle jerk, consumers don't give a fuck though.

14

I've won when everybody gets the principles of free software philosophy, along with other essential freedoms, free roaming, free speech, free assembly, free press, free energy, free healthcare, etc.

It's the freedom.

Free to use, study, share, change.

The Free Software Definition

The free software definition presents the criteria for whether a particular software program qualifies as free software. From time to time we revise this definition, to clarify it or to resolve questions about subtle issues. See the History section below for a list of changes that affect the definition of free software.

The four essential freedoms

A program is free software if the program's users have the four essential freedoms: [1]

  • The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose (freedom 0).
  • The freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does your computing as you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
  • The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help others (freedom 2).
  • The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others (freedom 3). By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes. Access to the source code is a precondition for this.

A program is free software if it gives users adequately all of these freedoms. Otherwise, it is nonfree. While we can distinguish various nonfree distribution schemes in terms of how far they fall short of being free, we consider them all equally unethical.

In any given scenario, these freedoms must apply to whatever code we plan to make use of, or lead others to make use of. For instance, consider a program A which automatically launches a program B to handle some cases. If we plan to distribute A as it stands, that implies users will need B, so we need to judge whether both A and B are free. However, if we plan to modify A so that it doesn't use B, only A needs to be free; B is not pertinent to that plan.

^ from https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html

13

Oh, yes, I won. I've known for months. Microsoft have nothing to do with it anymore.

12

yeah nah. They're claiming a lot of shit. Whether or not it gets removed is another matter.

I fully expect their bullshit to stay everywhere, they're just gonna get quieter about it

12

But my left handed microscope scissors rat nail polishing encabrulator only works on windows 11 if it has AI! Whatever should I do?!!!

Rat flies out of the window nails, face ears all properly painted and polished.... Then the windows 11disk followed by the rest of the computer parts and the bat that did it all in.

10
Kangyreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I use boost. It has an ad free version.

Though you're making me wonder if I should change given your surprise haha

4
Authreply
lemmy.world

I got a popup on my work PC 5 mins ago advertising co pilot.

3

I think it will come back. Given that its using a system notification to suggest an app that is suggested to me in every app I open, pinned to my taskbar, pinned to my start menu and built into my keyboard.

3

Too late, trust is already gone and im old enough to know all of this is CEOs bullshit and pure marketing.

9

It will continue to dominate the market (along with apple) as long as it is the default OS on new pcs.

9
dandylionreply
lemmy.zip

might be, but fortunately switching to and getting used to linux is so easy nowadays.

5
reksasreply
sopuli.xyz

no matter how easy it is, so many people have locked themselves in into delusions that its hardest thing ever, be it based on truthful experiences or not.

0

I was one of them until 2 months ago. I am still far from being tech knowledgeable but thanks to modern distros it was surprisingly easy and I didnt regret the switch for even a second. I'm actually impressed and feel so much safer now

but yes, we won't have MOST microsoft users switch anytime soon - but there are lots of people switching over atm due to recent events

3

I thought I'd miss Windows more than I do, but there was no way in hell I was going to install 11.

Glad I switched. Literally, the only feature I miss is the big, multi-format preview pane in File Explorer. That was very handy.

9

No you didn't win, they are rebranding their enshitification and tweaking it, it will end in the same spot. Just like minneapolis "won" in getting the feds to somewhat back off of summary executions of citizens under false pretense for the moment. No one was charged, the state is deferring to the feds as if the 10th amendment didn't make it their duty to prosecute crimes whose precedent would allow federal agents to summarily execute a governor under similar false pretense, contrived altercation, and get away scot free. Or a county prosecutor.

8

After pushback from users? Or after realising how much it's costing them on the server end?

8

I won? Of course I did, I don't use Windows anymore, I've been using Linux for years now.

8
lemmy.world

This is not last time when we said we'd roll back Recall and then put it back in anyway. This time we'll roll back Recall (and, eventually, put it back in but please don't leave our platform!)

7

I mean... it wasn't exactly difficult to predict this outcome. How many of their employees actually found it useful outside of the C-suite (where they thought it was fantastic because it bullshits just like they do)?

7

Apart from using windows at work, it's considered dead to me. 

6
lemmy.world

It would be nice if they change the Office app back to its old name, rather than M365 Copilot or whatever insane nonsense they picked. They should also review their corporate culture, and how the way they set performance rewards leads to insane unintended consequences across the company.

6
lemmy.world

Office has been Microsoft 365 for five years now. They added "Copilot" to the name at some point last year, but it's been M365 for a while.

2
Jankatarchreply
lemmy.world

Tbf 5 years ago is 2021 and I remember disliking Microsoft's decisions even back then.

1

Oh, absolutely--but back then it was just normal, ordinary platform decay, not the sparkling AI hellscape of today.

2
infosec.pub

Still planning time to test zorin on my machine along with mint and lubuntu.

6
lemmy.world

I didn't love zorin if I'm honest. Felt like mint but worse? Don't take my word for it but I'm surprised to see it recommended so frequently. Been thinking of trying catchy soon as I've seen it mentioned a lot lately and haven't been on a good distro hop in a minute

2

Thanks, I'll keep that in mind. I've been using lubuntu an a bunch of old laptops for ages. I'm definitely a fan, but am not sure about its support of my hardware. Much testing is needed. I've got to make some time for the task.

1

Any remnant of Copilot left anywhere on the operating system is still a loss for the user and their privacy. Microsoft still wants user data, so they're not going to be getting rid of Copilot any time soon.

4

Ok, so no Macroslop, just back to regular Microslop then.

4

Yeah so they will run all of it under the hood just hidden from users without possibility to opt out. Just wait few months.

4

I'd say too fucking late. Those who have had problems have already left. And the rest can't, for whatever reason. So walking back won't bring those who left back. Or even if some do come back, they'll leave on the first sign of shenanigans, cause now they know they have a choice and that it is doable.

3
lemmy.world

I love all the Linux folks that can't ignore a single windows news article :)

3

This is Linux territory MS, take your pedo CEO with you and leave, before we send our trans-hackers army after you.

3

Consumers cannot trust Microslop.

If you haven't already, download and keep O&O ShutUp on your PC if you're having to use Windows and run it regularly, because Windows updates will roll back any changes you've made to its invasive settings. It will also help you delete Copilot off your PC.

3
IMALlamareply
lemmy.world

As someone with a foot in Windows and Mac, they both suck for different reasons and you're trading pain in one for pain in the other.

Windows sucks because of all the stupid one drive and AI garbage. No, I don't want my desktop and tons of other directories in one drive, stop asking me. The constant migration of settings out of control panel is maddening. Windows 10 end of life is fine, but cutting off older PCs from windows 11 for "reasons" was an absolutely horrible choice.

Mac is fine if you do super basic computing, but if you want to do much of anything it's very annoying out of the box. Window management is annoying unless you get an app like magnet, the ribbon can't be displayed on dual monitors and there's no way of fixing the primary monitor, keyboard shortcuts are inconsistent across applications like command delete and keyboard shortcuts in general suck (command + shift + 3-5), the OS greatly dislikes network storage, etc etc. Macs were somewhat isolated from marketing needing a "new" OS every year until recently. Now they're in the change for the sake of things to list on the new OS page trap.

Linux isn't without fault, but my experience has been much more pleasant.

11
Samsyreply
lemmy.ml

Since I'm a Linux enthusiast, too. This is not correct. Pain free and easy to adopt has it only been in the last years.

2

Agreed. I could only get on it after it 1. Actually started running the vast majority of video games (Wine and Proton developments mainly post-pandemic) and 2. Had decent performance thanks to Wayland (to this day KDE on X11 using my older GT1030 has embarrassing performance, but I've switched to an RX9060 so :3)

2

The only windows pc I still have is my laptop, which has touchscreen and fingerprint scanner. I’m sure both of those things can be worked around (most distros seem capable of touch support at any rate) but I genuinely don’t know what I’m doing trying to make that happen so it stays for now. I use it for one and only one task, so it’s not the absolute worst but I’d like to be rid of it anyway because omfg why does it need updates every single time I go to use it??

My other three computers are on Ubuntu (gasp the horrors!) It’s what I started with back in 2018, and Debian is the only base I actually know any commands for even if it isn’t very many. Plus it’s stable and does what I want out of the box. Except it didn’t register the finger print scanner when I tried. Maybe it would with a bunch of tweaking, idk.

2

I'm gonna end microsoft as a company if I can't get my Realms world back that they claim is "past its extension."

1
feddit.nl

Like, even if they do listen to the community, it still isn't good enough for the Linux shills on here.

God, the Linux community is so uptight. It really doesn't do FOSS any favour acting like this.

It would be less bad if they could all agree to one recommended distro, but even that is an impossibility.

-10

Your problem with the Linux community is that there's a lot of options? I cannot understand how that's a bad thing. If there was only one distro it would be the same as now, but with less diversity.

The reason this isn't good enough is that it's a shallow capitulation by a company still massively over invested in AI. Nobody believes Microsoft is actually going to give up on shoving AI down people's throats, they're just gonna be more subtle about it now.

8