Spyke

Posts

unixporn·UnixpornbyDigit

Nothing to see here. Still in XFCE. But my st theme's still nice warm colours.

^ The Show

v The Tell

The Fetch

On the left pane, I issued

for i in (brl list | egrep -v bedrock) ; echo $i | toilet -f future -t $argv | lolcat ; strat -r $i neofetch ; end

(That's fish btw.)

(And yes, neofetch, because I don't yet know how to get fastfetch to respect the strata.)

IIRC, the details on this, a couple years old system since last reinstall of the OS: Hijacked MX, imported AntiX and Artix, fetched the gentoo, devuans and void... package counts not too misleading about what's getting used most, once looking past which came with a fatload preinstalled (MX & AntiX), and which split their packages more causing a bigger number (all the ones based on debians and devuans). Void's my first go-to for any package. Gentoo for when I want to get fussy (e.g. for Gimp or Emacs), the devuans generally for stability, and for what I can't get from void or gentoo. And artix just for the AUR... which I'm currently on pause from using, after being extra careful to gut out anything that could even be remotely afflicted by the recent several bursts of malware attacks. But, besides there being more devuan than gentoo this time (only the one active gentoo stratum? :O), this is a fairly typical daily driver setup for me... Frankly, it has not changed much for about a decade or more. I've got it dialled in, how I like it. With my 4 cornerstones. Void, Gentoo, Devuan, Artix.

The Font

And, before anyone has a [love, or hate] fit about the font (~ 6pixel in st, just for the screenshot to fit it all in ~ my eyes are not that good any more, bigger (12pix I think) in the date, top right), it's called nztt, and is my fave one of many I made a while ago, as part of what had became known as dbtfc ("Digit's Big Tiny Font Collection"). Maybe there are a silent indifferent majority, but most of what I hear are the reactions at the extremes, to nztt. It's genuinely my daily driver, most places. ... Not on web pages though... nztt's designed to maximise vertical space while still being comfortably readable (at least to my own peculiarity of dyslexia), and thus breaks the layout of a lot of websites expecting letters twice as tall with 10 times the vertical space wasted. It's ttf, not a true pixel font, but it is designed to best fit at 6, 12, 18, etc pixels size. Largely inspired by "clean" font, old 80s screen fonts, and my other explorations into tiny fonts.

The Rest

I'm still in XFCE on this T495 Thinkpad. I had intended to switch to using my wminizer script, populated with a standard 2 wmrotate scripts, the first populated with just xmonad, dwm, and herbstluftwm, and the other, the same, but also with openbox.

But I've always had things on here, never found a nice moment to interrupt things. ... The irony. This would be a non-issue with wminizer. But I've not yet done the first restart of X11 to get it running wminizer. So [even though I've already changed the config, ready to go] I'm stuck in that predicament that I wrote wminizer to be able to solve. XD

[PS, I'm burned out and left my repos in a terrible janky way, even by my scruffy standard... like the tagline on my codeberg profile says: "My stuff's scruffy. Don't use it."... ... though, if you don't mind fiddling around past my jank... wminizer is availing a very cool ability to have: Can change your wm without restarting X11, keeping everything running, and, can change the list of which wm you can switch to, too, keeping everything running uninterupted, without restarting X11.]

Nothing much fancy done to the XFCE. Didn't intend to stay. Made the bar nice and tight, how I like it. Only in recent days, (after months... years(!??) lingering in XFCE), I moved it to the top, to try, to see if that would be less annoying, fewer times of its pop ups from mouse overs on the taskbar buttons getting in the way of the things i want to click (e.g. active erc buffers listed in my mode-line in emacs). Should be fewer things up top that I'd want to be clicking where it shows. Mostly just the window bar there.

The Nothing To See Here.

And so, that's why there's nothing much to see here. In the typical eye-candy unix porn sense. But... the eagle eye'd may have spotted the one tid-bit of show-and-tell that may excite some, perhaps as much as 1-10% as much as it excites me, highlighted in the right pane. ... two things in a way. 1st, there's bpt! And 2nd (the main excitement for me), in bpt, there's the htop fork, with the stratum column!

A few years back (I forget when... 2019?) I had been musing various ways (in my own janky limited-abilities-and-knowledge way) to get strata info on various system info tools [[[(see doodle drop down example)]]], and mentioning my own fledgling flailing failing efforts. And then paradigm surprised me one day, (iirc) simply saying "Happy Christmas", and presented a link to a version of htop (that he had made) that now had the stratum column. :) After a while, my continued use of it became contingent on me maintaining its old deps manually (~ and certainly, any efforts of mine to maintain patching for newer htop and deps, failed early fast and hard). And eventually, I failed managing to even maintain it... and so, for a few months or so, I'd become without htop with a stratum column. And so went back to trying to hack up my own solutions...

::: spoiler llm doodled another thing like that recently in the interim without it

function psbr2
    # 1. Snapshot the entire output exactly once
    set -l ps_data (ps aux)

    # 2. Print header with the new column
    echo "$ps_data[1] STRATUM"

    # 3. Process each process line
    for line in $ps_data[2..-1]
        # Split by whitespace, automatically collapsing multiple spaces
        set -l fields (string split -n ' ' $line)
        set -l pid $fields[2]
	# Resolve stratum for this specific PID
        set -l strat (brl which $pid 2>/dev/null || echo "-")
	# Append the stratum to the original line

    echo -n "$line" ; set_color red ; echo " $strat" ; set_color normal 
    end
end

Though, true to my ways of janky code, that runs slow.

[Actually... If I'd put my mind to it more, I'd have done better than the llm there, I see now, looking at that again. Jeez they do silly things. ... anyways... moving on... no spoons to mend it now. Code's spoon expensive. Rambling this drivel's fine. I am obeying burnout recovery protocol with this. Honest.]

Anyway, that's just to give the gist, of some system info tool getting strata info added to it.

:::

and then came paradigm again, now in 2026, with bpt this time, populated with... htop! (and 9 other packages, but meh, the htop with stratum column's the real highlight among the libs and other standard boring things).

So if your system is stratified, that may be handy for you. :)

That's the highlight here for me, main reason (besides boredom (while supposed to be resting from burnout)?) for posting:

htop with stratum column is back!

(But shshsh. Still linux's best kept secret. Hehe. You know what I mean if you know. If not [(or even if in the know, back to)]... ooh, look at the novel autumnal colour theme for the terminal, and, either "That font is base/sick/thegoat/wild/cool/snappy" or "Yeurgh. Do you actually use that font!? What's wrong with you!".)

Though this [intentionally buried lede] is exciting to me, it probably isn't exciting for anyone else, certainly not the majority... but isn't that the greatest glory of unix porn? Each their own.

... I better stop proof reading this before I keep adding more so much that it gets long. :3

View original on lemmy.wtf
MemesOfProduction·Seize The Memes of ProductionbyDigit

Agnotology VS Emancipatory Technologies

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.wtf/post/38893194

3rd time lucky finding a home for this?

(Leaving the former re-post's unnecessarily long preface and refutation diatribe intact, because, lazy, and posterity and such... the bold bit's maybe rousing enough to be worth a quick read. But really, this post's just for the meme pointing at the idea, critiquing all the "disclosure" hubbub (likely even more now there's a movie of that name), with the simple contrast to "provision", revealing mere "disclosure" still does not emancipate us, merely reveals those who've hoarded the means of production have indeed hoarded far more than they let on, and still they're in the position of power over us to continue to agnotologically abuse us. ... Or at least, that's the kind of thing it speak to me with. ... Maybe others don't catch on to the same depth and significance.)

[Reposting from an unfathomnably-reasoned "not political" removal from political memes @ lemmy world. (see my spoiler expansion for my reply refuting that). Political Memes seemed the best place to post it, but they removed it ("not political" ~wat). I hope [re]posting this here is at least seen as relevant to politics. Sorry it's a mere meme, but, I hope the relevant depth behind it can be readily seen, and it's acceptable here. [Edit: It fits with this community's "Posts must be related to Conflict, Politicians, Nation-states, Electoralism, or International Relations". If that's not immediately apparent how, I can elaborate and reason on that extensively (and have already, in the spoiler copy of the reasoning offered to mods of the politicalmemes community).]]

Over 20 years ago, patent office whistle blower Tom Valone already disclosed that by the year 2000 there had already been over 3000 free energy device patents, secreted.

Disclosure? That’s your political aspiration and protest?

Lets aim a little higher.

Lets avail and provision everybody with the best.

Star Trek replicators, interstellar travel, and more.

Free energy tech + energy-to-matter transfer tech = they can print gold from nothing.

No cull necessary. No resource wars necessary. No mineral mining necessary. No combustion necessary. We never needed rockets.

Follow the tech arc from Michael Faraday through to Nikola Tesla (and the many less loud and showy between)…

Spaceships for everybody.

::: spoiler Reply to original post removal from politicalmemes @ lemmy world, refuting the reason, quote, not political, unqoute.

Removed Post Agnotology VS Emancipatory Technologies reason: not political. also, a little conspiracy based (which in itself breaks no rules)

Not political?

Wat.

How so? I do not understand.

The socio-economic implications of disclosure [or even, provisioning] of suppressed technologies that can emancipate people is obviously very much in the realm of politics. Or is emancipation no longer considered a political issue? If so, that's beyond my fathoming.

There are plenty of politicians who talk about disclosure.

Even one who was most famous because of his involvement in emancipation. (Abraham Lincoln)

And many political philosophies are all up in the idea of provisioning resources, or availing the best to each and all.

a little conspiracy based (which in itself breaks no rules)

???

I... I don't even know where to begin with that portion of the reason this post was supposedly removed, according to the modlog [... yet I can still see it and reply...? Evidently I do not yet understand how Lemmy works.].

Is that use of "conspiracy" in the ratcheted newspeak of the psyop phrase "conspiracy theory" used to dissuade scrutiny?

As in presumed spurious falsehood misinfo? Of the whole idea that there are suppressed technologies?

If so, it may serve you [whoever attempted to remove this post] very well to look into the patent system, and agnotology. The patent system has several levels by which technologies that can be of benefit to each and all are suppressed. [For brief general outline] From corporations [1] buying patents, [2] buying patent extension rules through corruption of the legal system [and political systems], to sit on patents for technologies that would compete and even obsolete their cash-cow technologies, and even [3] outright secreting patents (e.g. under the spurious reasoning of "national security") [as highlighted by the first line of the post, about a patent office whistleblower's reveal]. The agnotology industry is vast. There are several good books [(~ I presume they're good~ I've not read them all yet)] about agnotology, the study of the creation of ignorance. When something gets classified to a higher level of secrecy, which seems to tend to happen on an over-cautious reflex, it almost never goes back the other way. [Edit: A couple good quotes about that [1]]

Further, even the choice of using Geordie LaForge from Star Trek TNG was due to the political implications.


So, given all that reasoning, surely it's easy to understand how I'm confounded by the appearance of this post in the modlog, with the reasoning given.

Removed Post Agnotology VS Emancipatory Technologies reason: not political. also, a little conspiracy based (which in itself breaks no rules)

What part of it, at all, was "not political"?

Disclosure, political issue, spoken of by politicians and other advocates and opponents.

Resource provisioning, political issue, arguably the core issue of all socio-economics.

Emancipation, political issue, of deep historical and contemporary importance.

Star Trek, Geordie La Forge, chosen because of the political insinuations/implications, that tie in with the message.

Whistleblowing about the patent system, a deeply politically entwined system, and a directly political action.

"Lets aim a little higher." & "Lets avail and provision everybody with the best." etc, an encouragement of a higher political aspiration.

"Free energy tech + energy-to-matter transfer tech = they can print gold from nothing." ... again, very obviously has political implications. Radically different economic system, where even gold can be printed like fiat.

"No cull necessary. No resource wars necessary. No mineral mining necessary. No combustion necessary. We never needed rockets." Political issue, political issue, political issue, political issue, political issue. Right to life, peace, environmentalism & resource management, environmentalism and right to roam freely without polluting rents, and freedom to leave and not be deceived to be kept down as a serf or slave, respectively. Just to keep it short about how each part of this is political. Can elaborate far longer on each part.

"Follow the tech arc from Michael Faraday through to Nikola Tesla (and the many less loud and showy between)…" again, highlights the broader poliltical implications here, with Nikola Tesla chosen as example with famous political implications with his idea of powering the world wirelessly for free at health affirming frequencies, and industry tycoons rejected his idea, with the famed line "where would we put the meter?", and Michael Faraday chosen as example to show how far back this goes, and to evoke curiosity of what and who, doing what, lays between these two towering examples of science and innovation that can (and has) changed the world, and radically shifted politics and empowerment of people and power alike.

Spaceships for everybody.

Highest political aspiration?

So, again, I'm baffled. How did this get flagged as not political? Every single bit of it is deeply political.

::: spoiler [1]

“We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects and it would take an act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity… anything you can imagine we already know how to do.” — Ben Rich, former Head of the Lockheed Skunk Works

“It is easier for us to pay a private contractor to re-invent something so it will come out at a lower classification level, than to try to declassify it.” – Bennett Hart, then Deputy Director of the National Reconnaissance Organization

View original on lemmy.wtf
globalpolitics·World PoliticsbyDigit

Agnotology VS Emancipatory Technologies

[Reposting from an unfathomnably-reasoned "not political" removal from political memes @ lemmy world. (see my spoiler expansion for my reply refuting that). Political Memes seemed the best place to post it, but they removed it ("not political" ~wat). I hope [re]posting this here is at least seen as relevant to politics. Sorry it's a mere meme, but, I hope the relevant depth behind it can be readily seen, and it's acceptable here. [Edit: It fits with this community's "Posts must be related to Conflict, Politicians, Nation-states, Electoralism, or International Relations". If that's not immediately apparent how, I can elaborate and reason on that extensively (and have already, in the spoiler copy of the reasoning offered to mods of the politicalmemes community).]]

Over 20 years ago, patent office whistle blower Tom Valone already disclosed that by the year 2000 there had already been over 3000 free energy device patents, secreted.

Disclosure? That’s your political aspiration and protest?

Lets aim a little higher.

Lets avail and provision everybody with the best.

Star Trek replicators, interstellar travel, and more.

Free energy tech + energy-to-matter transfer tech = they can print gold from nothing.

No cull necessary. No resource wars necessary. No mineral mining necessary. No combustion necessary. We never needed rockets.

Follow the tech arc from Michael Faraday through to Nikola Tesla (and the many less loud and showy between)…

Spaceships for everybody.

::: spoiler Reply to original post removal from politicalmemes @ lemmy world, refuting the reason, quote, not political, unqoute.

Removed Post Agnotology VS Emancipatory Technologies reason: not political. also, a little conspiracy based (which in itself breaks no rules)

Not political?

Wat.

How so? I do not understand.

The socio-economic implications of disclosure [or even, provisioning] of suppressed technologies that can emancipate people is obviously very much in the realm of politics. Or is emancipation no longer considered a political issue? If so, that's beyond my fathoming.

There are plenty of politicians who talk about disclosure.

Even one who was most famous because of his involvement in emancipation. (Abraham Lincoln)

And many political philosophies are all up in the idea of provisioning resources, or availing the best to each and all.

a little conspiracy based (which in itself breaks no rules)

???

I... I don't even know where to begin with that portion of the reason this post was supposedly removed, according to the modlog [... yet I can still see it and reply...? Evidently I do not yet understand how Lemmy works.].

Is that use of "conspiracy" in the ratcheted newspeak of the psyop phrase "conspiracy theory" used to dissuade scrutiny?

As in presumed spurious falsehood misinfo? Of the whole idea that there are suppressed technologies?

If so, it may serve you [whoever attempted to remove this post] very well to look into the patent system, and agnotology. The patent system has several levels by which technologies that can be of benefit to each and all are suppressed. [For brief general outline] From corporations [1] buying patents, [2] buying patent extension rules through corruption of the legal system [and political systems], to sit on patents for technologies that would compete and even obsolete their cash-cow technologies, and even [3] outright secreting patents (e.g. under the spurious reasoning of "national security") [as highlighted by the first line of the post, about a patent office whistleblower's reveal]. The agnotology industry is vast. There are several good books [(~ I presume they're good~ I've not read them all yet)] about agnotology, the study of the creation of ignorance. When something gets classified to a higher level of secrecy, which seems to tend to happen on an over-cautious reflex, it almost never goes back the other way. [Edit: A couple good quotes about that [1]]

Further, even the choice of using Geordie LaForge from Star Trek TNG was due to the political implications.


So, given all that reasoning, surely it's easy to understand how I'm confounded by the appearance of this post in the modlog, with the reasoning given.

Removed Post Agnotology VS Emancipatory Technologies reason: not political. also, a little conspiracy based (which in itself breaks no rules)

What part of it, at all, was "not political"?

Disclosure, political issue, spoken of by politicians and other advocates and opponents.

Resource provisioning, political issue, arguably the core issue of all socio-economics.

Emancipation, political issue, of deep historical and contemporary importance.

Star Trek, Geordie La Forge, chosen because of the political insinuations/implications, that tie in with the message.

Whistleblowing about the patent system, a deeply politically entwined system, and a directly political action.

"Lets aim a little higher." & "Lets avail and provision everybody with the best." etc, an encouragement of a higher political aspiration.

"Free energy tech + energy-to-matter transfer tech = they can print gold from nothing." ... again, very obviously has political implications. Radically different economic system, where even gold can be printed like fiat.

"No cull necessary. No resource wars necessary. No mineral mining necessary. No combustion necessary. We never needed rockets." Political issue, political issue, political issue, political issue, political issue. Right to life, peace, environmentalism & resource management, environmentalism and right to roam freely without polluting rents, and freedom to leave and not be deceived to be kept down as a serf or slave, respectively. Just to keep it short about how each part of this is political. Can elaborate far longer on each part.

"Follow the tech arc from Michael Faraday through to Nikola Tesla (and the many less loud and showy between)…" again, highlights the broader poliltical implications here, with Nikola Tesla chosen as example with famous political implications with his idea of powering the world wirelessly for free at health affirming frequencies, and industry tycoons rejected his idea, with the famed line "where would we put the meter?", and Michael Faraday chosen as example to show how far back this goes, and to evoke curiosity of what and who, doing what, lays between these two towering examples of science and innovation that can (and has) changed the world, and radically shifted politics and empowerment of people and power alike.

Spaceships for everybody.

Highest political aspiration?

So, again, I'm baffled. How did this get flagged as not political? Every single bit of it is deeply political.

::: spoiler [1]

“We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects and it would take an act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity… anything you can imagine we already know how to do.” — Ben Rich, former Head of the Lockheed Skunk Works

“It is easier for us to pay a private contractor to re-invent something so it will come out at a lower classification level, than to try to declassify it.” – Bennett Hart, then Deputy Director of the National Reconnaissance Organization

View original on lemmy.wtf
UGEM·undergroundElectronicbyDigit

soffmi muhod [unknown genre... Drone? Zonk?] [2003(?)-2024(?)]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.wtf/post/36398305

[Additional, for UGEM cross post: Very Glad UnderGround Electronic Music community has started. Here's one post to get the ball rolling. Hoping to see much more lesser known electronic music here.]

[Original post to obscure music:]

So glad to have encountered this community. So much to explore. I love people's recommendations of obscure lesser-known music.

Here's mine: soffmi muhod.

Currently playing semble^1^, as I do a lot.

I keep saying I'm soffmi muhod's biggest fan. I've not had anyone attempt to challenge me on that yet. ... I may be soffmi muhod's only fan. That obscure enough?

Something like 20 albums [(and over 20 hours to listen to)] (at least on bandcamp) over the past 20 years or so. And as far as I know, only 1 fan.

I find it really difficult to describe, even to put into some genre category. "Audio art", it says. "Ambient", it says. "Experimental", it says. "Zonk"(?), it says. It even says Boards of Canada is its mother, and Autechre is its father, and that it is a "child of music". As someone put it "a union with a tone generator [and something ~ I forget what]".

Is this obscure enough for this "Obscure Music" community? :)

Surely.

It's the most obscure I know.

^1^ After semble, I'm hard pressed to pick a fave album (except not the first and last, the weakest). ... [Backspaced over a start of an attempt to describe some highlights, like everon, ripoonjadi, pHphimorphia, the enthusiast, both the "sides", lojg mucg, jymg kega, counterpart, mq7, opsyem, Qavykr, qysqam, uwkivj mkiriac, and "the orange album", because then I realise that's nearly all of them]

soffmi muhod [unknown genre... Drone?  Zonk?] [2003(?)-2024(?)]https://soffmimuhod.bandcamp.com/Open linkView original on lemmy.wtf
obscuremusic·Obscure MusicbyDigit

soffmi muhod [unknown genre... Drone? Zonk?] [2003(?)-2024(?)]

So glad to have encountered this community. So much to explore. I love people's recommendations of obscure lesser-known music.

Here's mine: soffmi muhod.

Currently playing semble^1^, as I do a lot.

I keep saying I'm soffmi muhod's biggest fan. I've not had anyone attempt to challenge me on that yet. ... I may be soffmi muhod's only fan. That obscure enough?

Something like 20 albums [(and over 20 hours to listen to)] (at least on bandcamp) over the past 20 years or so. And as far as I know, only 1 fan.

I find it really difficult to describe, even to put into some genre category. "Audio art", it says. "Ambient", it says. "Experimental", it says. "Zonk"(?), it says. It even says Boards of Canada is its mother, and Autechre is its father, and that it is a "child of music". As someone put it "a union with a tone generator [and something ~ I forget what]".

Is this obscure enough for this "Obscure Music" community? :)

Surely.

It's the most obscure I know.

^1^ After semble, I'm hard pressed to pick a fave album (except not the first and last, the weakest). ... [Backspaced over a start of an attempt to describe some highlights, like everon, ripoonjadi, pHphimorphia, the enthusiast, both the "sides", lojg mucg, jymg kega, counterpart, mq7, opsyem, Qavykr, qysqam, uwkivj mkiriac, and "the orange album", because then I realise that's nearly all of them]

soffmi muhod [unknown genre... Drone?  Zonk?] [2003(?)-2024(?)]https://soffmimuhod.bandcamp.com/Open linkView original on lemmy.wtf
emacs·EmacsbyDigit

Who is the youngest emacs user?

The idea for this post started today when I saw in #emacs-til on libera.chat:

  • [2026-01-17 22:30:19] TIL emacs is just not for old boomers lol
  • [2026-01-17 22:31:53] also for younger boomers
  • [2026-01-17 22:33:10] haha that's me!
  • [2026-01-17 22:33:17] lil baby baby boomer
  • [2026-01-17 23:25:18] the Youth of Today love Emacs
  • [2026-01-17 23:25:29] I asked one of them back in... uh...
  • [2026-01-17 23:25:31] 1991?

So I did a websearch for the youngest emacs user, and, the websearch results couldn't help but all be about how old emacs users are.

So I ask Lemmy...

Who is the youngest emacs user?

[And no, before anyone thinks otherwise, that image is not real. I just put that together for whimsical illustration, from an image search or 3, with a relevant comment, an image from an article about a 2 year old who self-taught the alphabet, and an image of an emacs welcome screen pasted together with the help of the GIMP.]

Who is the youngest emacs user?

Anyone younger than 40? In 20s? Teens?? Younger??!

View original on lemmy.wtf

fin - fish extensible text editor written in fish

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.wtf/post/26550037 to [email protected] just for the attention of more fish users.

fin - fish extensible text editor written in fish

It's really just a novel proof of concept.

Just showing off how useful fish can be.

And I really liked the idea of my text editor being extensible in the language I'm most familiar with, fish, using it every day on the command line.

I burned out on it after the first month (and wrestling undo/redo to work how I wanted next month (or two)), so progress has stalled for a few months [~ so it's not yet up to the level of features [e.g. syntax highlighting] before I start bootstrapping its development, writing fin in fin, rather than in emacs]. :/ But it still does the job. :)

(And, FYI, fish fans, see the fishsticks branch for the more fish-centric version (fewer unixy-tool dependencies (than main branch) and less awk(wardness) (than arctictern branch))

Feel free to contribute or fork, if you like the fun idea. :D

PS, fin is tiny. Fewer lines of code than e.g. even just the git thing in the default fish prompt. And it's a whole text editor! :)

Started on a whim. Is actually useable.

fin - fish extensible text editor written in fishhttps://codeberg.org/Digit/finOpen linkView original on lemmy.wtf
anarchism·AnarchismbyDigit

Malarchy Masquerades

Rough idea made on a whim. Constructive and critical feedback welcome. Better memes depicting the idea even more welcome.

Image: A gloved hand peeling an Anarchy sticker off Malarchy.

Text: Malarchy masquerades as Anarchy, to look good, and make Anarchy look bad.

For one real world example among many, to consider stop falling for: Those palates of bricks that big money conveniently deliver to bank/capitalism protests.

Heh, I wonder how "over the target" this is, and gets heavily downvoted by agents and unwitting assets not liking the reveal or invite to scrutiny. ;)

[Edit: Since "Malarchy"'s not nearly as well known or as immediately understood as I imagined,

Mal-Archy, is a bit of a portmanteau made of:

mal

    1. Evil; disease.
    1. A prefix of Latin origin, through French (equivalent to dys- or caco- of Greek origin), meaning ‘bad,’ and implying usually imperfection or deficiency, and often simply a negative, as in malodor, a bad odor, malfeasance, bad- or wrong-doing, malformation, imperfect shape, maladroit, not adroit, malcontent, not content, etc. The prefix in this form occurs only in words taken from the French, or formed upon the analogies of such.

&

archy

    1. A suffix properly meaning a rule, ruling, as in monarchy, the rule of one only. Cf. -arch.

Archy, ruled by.

Mal, bad.

And it's like "Malarkey", deceptive foolishness too. But with more dominating unjust power overtones.

Malarchy. ]

PS, While I'm at it... Some relevant quotes:

"Governments have always used the pretext of ‘public safety’ to suppress dissent. They create the very chaos they claim to fight, so they can pose as saviors." -- Errico Malatesta

"The history of the State is the history of violence, but it is also the history of lies—lies told to the people to make them accept their own enslavement." -- Peter Kropotkin

"Every act of government violence is wrapped in the flag and sold as patriotism. The State’s greatest trick is making people believe that their oppressors are their protectors." -- Emma Goldman

"States don’t just respond to crises—they need crises. They need enemies, real or invented, to justify their existence. The ‘war on terror’ is just the latest version of a very old game." -- David Graeber

"The first revolutionist is the State itself. It revolts against its own principles, against its own lies, to better enslave us under new disguises." -- Mikhail Bakunin

"The most effective way to neutralize a radical idea is to take its symbols, drain them of meaning, and sell them back to the people as a commodity." -- David Graeber

"The worst enemies of anarchy are not its open opponents, but those who pretend to be anarchists while serving the interests of the powerful." -- Errico Malatesta

"Beware those who wrap themselves in the red flag to hide their betrayal." -- Gustave Lefrançais

"They fear our ideas, so they steal our symbols." -- Anonymous

"The State’s favorite anarchist is a fake one."

"Real anarchy threatens power. Fake anarchy is power."

"They wear our symbols like costumes… but their script is written by the State

"The State is nothing but a vast machine for the oppression of the masses, a machine that lives on lies and thrives on the ignorance of the people." -- Mikhail Bakunin

"Fascism and capitalism are not opposites—they are partners in the same crime. One gives the orders, the other provides the guns. Both rely on your fear, your confusion, and your obedience. Do not believe their lies. Do not obey their commands. Think for yourself, act for yourself, and trust only in solidarity." -- Errico Malatesta

[Edit: oh... I already added this to the end too... Why was that other responder requesting... "You can post 10000 quotes but not just tell us what you mean with “Malarchy”? "Oh... their intention was on the "just"... as in to rid the quotes... no wait, but why did they also say I can add 10,000 quotes... I'm very confused... their answer was already there... why were they~ ugh, never mind. Well, it's now added above as well as beneath the anarchists' quotes depicting malarchy; power/archy's deceitfulness. Surely there wont be a third responder asking what's malarchy now, since that's been well covered here at least 3 or 4 times now. Unless they're just up to more malarchy.]

mal noun

Evil; disease. A prefix of Latin origin, through French (equivalent to dys- or caco- of Greek origin), meaning ‘bad,’ and implying usually imperfection or deficiency, and often simply a negative, as in malodor, a bad odor, malfeasance, bad- or wrong-doing, malformation, imperfect shape, maladroit, not adroit, malcontent, not content, etc. The prefix in this form occurs only in words taken from the French, or formed upon the analogies of such. (Oh, I did not know that… “The prefix in this form occurs only in words taken from the French, or formed upon the analogies of such.” Interesting. And I dare say, fitting, what with all the revolutionary spirit in France.)

&

archy adjective

Arched. archy brows A suffix properly meaning a rule, ruling, as in monarchy, the rule of one only. Cf. -arch. Archy, ruled by.

Mal, bad.

View original on lemmy.wtf
leftymemes·Lefty MemesbyDigit

not my left

I love these three socialist lemmies. So I'm posting this here. Not sure how well or how mixed a reception this will get here. Not sure if the right place to post it. Plausibly shall step on some toes (with the bottommost instance of "not my left") a bit. And I imagine there may be some responses nitpicking that 3 of the "not my left"s are more left than "my left" ~ to which I say, misses the point. Anyhoo... enjoy, or don't. I strive to protect your freedom to receive things however you wish. Love that bitch called interpretation. ;D But I do hope it sparks some interesting thought, discussion, and maybe even is a useful tool. At the very least, it'll help (a bit) to explain what I mean when I keep saying "not my left", to those who misrepresent the authoritarian left as "the left", or even really really misrepresent by calling the nowadays so-called "liberal" (left side of authoritarian right) as "the left".

View original on lemmy.wtf