Why is kindness often viewed as a sign of naïveté?
I try to be kind, upbeat, etc in my interactions with other people, especially at work. I want to treat others well, work together peacefully, and leave the project happy. I’ve noticed that some people (particularly more curmudgeonly folks) seem to read that attitude as naïveté, and feel like they can walk all over me or treat me like I don’t know what I’m talking about. Why is that?
203
Comments76
People sometimes have difficulty walking the line between being nice and being a doormat and let people take advantage of their kindness. This bitters some people and they start to see their own kindness as a weakness.
When this happens they tend to think people who are kind just haven't had that bad experience yet and that they're naive about the way the world "really works".
It’s funny, but I feel like I strive to be kind because I’m aware of how the world really works. Like, I’ve been let down by reality and know the world can be a nightmare already, so why would I want to pile even more on someone and make their life harder, you know?
“Hello babies. Welcome to Earth. It's hot in the summer and cold in the winter. It's round and wet and crowded. On the outside, babies, you've got a hundred years here. There's only one rule that I know of, babies-"God damn it, you've got to be kind.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
You sound very sweet, OP. Never change. A lot of people are just miserable themselves and want company being miserable.
Oh, sweet summer child
/s
I think there might be a kind of tragedy of the commons thinking there, as in "Somebody is going to take advantage of this naive person, it may as well be me."
Some people were taught that being an asshole is good; hence, being nice is bad.
Finna git mine. 💰💵🌐🪣🦀🔪🔫
I support your endeavours!
You seem to be a nice person. Don’t give up. I hope you find your people and I’d be happy to have positive people like you around me. Do you read about Buddhism and metta at all? When the whole world can show love and respect to themselves and others it will be a better place, and you seem to be there already.
Thank you 😊
I actually was very into Buddhism a few years ago. I had a better meditation practice then, and I did a lot of reading, some on metta, but moreso insight. I don’t think I’d consider myself a Buddhist, but they have a lot of good ideas!
I'd bet that there is a lot of overlap between "people who are kind" and "people who are easily taken advantage of".
But the converse is true as well, for example the political situation in the UK with Brexit and USA with Republicans showed, that there is also a big overlap between "people who are assholes" and "people who are easily taken advantage of".
So I think it's rather humans are easily taken advantage of, if you know how.
And also thus them being stupid.
People think you are either (a) nice and let people walk all over you, or (b) you have to be evil to be strong. But the truth is you can be in between, you can be both nice and retaliatory in case others are evil to you first.
Its actually the best game-theory strategy, called "Tit-for-Tat", you be nice to others, but don't be afraid to retaliate when they start being evil. Because if you don't retaliate, they will take advantage of you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mScpHTIi-kM
With a slight addendum, tit for tat is best, while also allowing for an appropriate amount of forgiveness in case of mistakes
Also this short game showcases the concept well https://ncase.me/trust/
I think the term for this is assertive. At least that's how I've been defining it. You can be compassionate while also setting boundaries to prevent people from walking all over you.
The best example from my life I can recall is when I was managing the weekend shift for a help desk and one of the techs got a call from a lady who had had a TBI and could not regulate her emotions. She needed some information that was not in our wheelhouse and when this kid told her shed have to call the other department on Monday she went off on him. I took over the call and was eventually able to talk her down and get her to understand that we could not help her and we were not just refusing to by going back and forth with her and keeping my voice even and setting boundaries when she started to get pissed. She was happy with the resolution I came up with by the end of the call. It took like an hour and I felt like I was breaking a horse to get therethough.
actual real humans in reality also have this amazing ability to "talk" to each other, allowing them to communicate and say things like "hey you're being a dick, stop being a dick and we can help each other instead, if you don't stop then me and everyone i know will throw you into the ocean"
Assholes like to rationalise their assholery by painting their victims as weak and somehow deserving it. You can very much see that in present day politics but you'll also meet people like that in real life.
Classic wolf vs sheep paranoid reality of toxic individualism.
These people cannot fathom humanity being bigger than “strong kill weak” or “predator / prey / competitor” classifications.
Many men hold this worldview as their reality as the bro culture and toxic masculinity plays right into it.
They see it as a vulnerability they can exploit to get what they want. This is a reminder to use strong boundaries. You can be kind but also strong.
Knowing when to set boundaries and sticking to them is not one of my strong suits, admittedly. But it’s something I’m working on.
How do you know when to set a boundary? How do you enforce it without feeling like an asshole?
Check in with yourself during/after interactions and explore your feelings/thoughts that came up. If you experience negative emotions after an interaction, ask yourself why. Did they say or do something that made you feel uncomfortable - ie: being controlling or physically being too close. Keep a list of this and update it. This will tell you what kind of boundaries you need to set and which people violate those boundaries. Then you can decide how you want to set the boundary - the boundary could be imposed on you (ie: you leave the room), the boundary could be imposed on the other person (ie: you tell them how you feel and tell them the consequences). The latter really depends on the kind of relationship you have with the other person.
I was in the same situation as the OP and I have done both the things you have suggested and guess what they didn't change anything. Yes the day I told them what I felt and walked out of the room, felt reliving, as I did what I wanted to do and the next few days felt different too. But things came back to being bad as they were before.
And this made me think that, I shouldn't have been the nice/doormat guy I was from the beginning itself and be more open about my views and opinions which would make me look like a strong character. First impression is everything and you really can't do anything after they're set.
You cannot control other people. And as I said, bouandry setting with others is a case by case situation. The next step would be to limit your interaction with them - this could be from changing your routine to something more drastic like changing jobs/going no contact.
To add to what others have said, boundary-setting is a skill we develop over many social interactions. It may feel awkward or mean setting a boundary initially, but it's essential to maintain one's "social battery" and priorities/sanity.
Speaking of priorities, those are a good indication as to when setting boundaries is helpful. For example, you have an important appointment to get to, but a family member/friend is asking your help with something at around the same time. Communicating you have a prior engagement at the time of your appointment while being willing to help out after, or giving them suggestion on how else they can get the help they need, is you setting a boundary of what you can do with your time.
When we have concerns of feeling like an asshole, we want to consider from where that originates. Sometimes we've been raised around family members or "friends" who take advantage of another's kindness and treat people maintaining boundaries as the villain (e.g. "Why are you leaving us hanging?/ Why couldn't you help me/your Old Man out this one time?"). This is often a sign of emotional immaturity/ poor insight, empathy, and/or self-awareness. Healthy connections will respect your boundaries and maybe check in later if a raincheck is suggested. When interacting with people who don't respect "no" as a full sentence and answer, sometimes reminding them of our limits and empathizing with the person's situation can disarm them.
Because the world is ruled by sociopaths.
Due to the inherently competitive nature of living in a society that competes for resources, many people assume that a kind, upbeat person will be easy prey for someone tough and pushy. They lack the emotional intelligence to understand that you can be both kind and assertive.
In reality, you catch more flies with honey. Pretty much every study of game theory concludes that nice but assertive is the optimal strategy in any ongoing interaction. A nice person with a backbone is likely to have healthier boundaries, lower stress, and better relationships with people.
Than with vinegar.
Because many people mistake selfishness for strength and intelligence.
However, not matter how wrong they are and how deep in denial they go, at the end of the day mean selfish people are bad people and kind people are good ones.
And these bad people look very stupid when they think they can get away with their bad behavior and the kind not naïve person, just say no and don't back down.
Because the world is run by narcissists and psychopaths
I mean the reason you have to ask is kind of... why
We're in mostly a capitalistic world. Capitalism makes utilitarianism seem easy since it becomes easy to assign a "value" to everything. That kind of thinking quickly gets you to naive cynicism. We're conditioned to think certain things are more valuable than others - mental wellbeing and community have been steadily devalued.
There's a saying "behind every cynic there's a disappointed idealist". We're in a world where a lot of people grew up in a time of amazing technological advancement, but have been bitterly disappointed by how the world is today. These people are now getting to that age where they may have been working the same job for a while (if they got lucky with job security) and they just want to get the job done and not exert any more effort than necessary (since by their experience, it doesn't "pay off").
Let them be them, you do your thing. They don't owe you any kind of behavior really, though it would be expected and polite of them to keep things at professional level of course. You don't owe them either so you don't have to let them bring you down. Don't take it personally though because it really, really isn't.
Obvs just my view. If you really want to know, you can try to just ask what they value and if you can work in a way that aligns with that while not disregarding your own values.
They think you're easy to take advantage of. If you assume that humans are innately evil (which I don't agree with), you'd also have to assume that kindness is a weakness.
IMO it's just propaganda, it's as simple as that. Evil people with no empathy want everyone to turn off their own empathy, so they can use their positions of power to exploit everyone else.
If people (sensibly) think that we should strive to be as kind as possible, it exposes the evil people as being obviously evil when they exploit others, and because we're trying to be as nice as possible we then wouldn't tolerate that and we'd take away their power so they can't exploit people any more.
Abusers try to stigmatize sympathy and empathy, because as long as it is a stigma then people won't talk to each other about their own abuse, then the abuser gets away with it. But no matter how strong and powerful an abuser is, even a fairly small number of dedicated, close-knit victims and their supporters can make the abusers lives extremely difficult, if not tip over their power completely.
Because the world is a horrible place full of horrible people that need to convince themselves that they're not horrible people.
Or that everyone else is just as horrible as they are, so they'd feel justified in being a sloppy fart of a person.
More and more I think it's this one. A lot of people have just convinced themselves that nobody's perfect so it's okay for them to be a massive piece of shit, too. There's a lot of people who are not trying to grow or improve
Likely because they were once upbeat and positive people too and it didn't get them what they want so they have changed their ways to be less positive.
So anybody who is still positive, in their experience, hasn't learned yet that that isn't going to get them what they want.
It might be a defense mechanism. They were taken advantage of when they were more open and positive.
It might just be bad learned behavior. The people who have what they want aren't very positive to them.
It is also not easy to stay positive so a lot of people choose not to. Sometimes we like to make excuses for why people are able to do the harder things that we're not doing. "Oh I would volunteer too if I had as much time as them.". "Oh I am just not naive enough to be that positive"
I was gonna say something similar, it's not so much about being nice, it's about being happy.
Its such a trope in movies and TV shows though. I call it the Khan trope. The narrative makes a huge deal about how unfathomably intelligent a villain is, and then when the villain is finally revealed they're like comically evil with the most superficial and pathetic philosophy. I think its just hard for dumb TV writers (no offense) to write intelligent villains.
To me a much better villain is someone who cares a great deal about something real, and is actually very intelligent and determined, but is just deeply confused about something. People like Tulsi Gabbard or Amy Coney Barret are good examples, they were raised in these weird cults and now they have no understanding of anything outside their narrow view, and have been conditioned to reject anything that contradicts their social beliefs. A lot of people think they are doing good, the people whom they love tell them all the time how proud they are, etc. But because of their intelligence and determination they just are all twisted up in knots inside a house of mirrors that they were forced into before they had the chance to question any of it.
And yeah these people may not be super intelligent, just opportunistic and smart/determined enough and groomed to take power. But it resembles actual intelligence more than "only the strong deserve to survive heh heh heh twirls moustache villainously" that we usually get from this slop.
I treat people being overly kind as deceptive.
Why is that?
Some people use kindness as deception.
Being overly kind or love bombing is manipulation tactic number one employed by a narcissist.
Oh, that makes sense, I suppose.
It's a common manipulation tactic and one unintelligent people tend to fall for hook, line, and sinker.
I use it all the time at work to lull people into a sense of safety to make them relax and fall back into the behavior I want to nail them for.
Oftentimes a person will do something they're not supposed to do, but won't do it around the manager. I'm the assistant manager and for whatever reason, people will do something they're NOT supposed to do around me and then wonder how the manager keeps finding out. I never let them know it was me and neither does my boss and people simply do not catch on for whatever reason.
I don't seek out people to report them, but I do have a duty to my manager and the company to make sure everyone does what they're supposed to. Even had one idiot stealing drinks and offer me one. Don't steal, it's not worth your job.
More like Dagwood_Snitchwich.
They're the assistant manager, it's literally their job to help manage the team. Don't do stupid shit in front of management and you won't get in shit, it's not rocket science.
I do my job. They do their job and there's no problem. My job is to take over for the manager when he's not there and to be his extra set of eyes and ears.
Rudeness is merely an expression of fear. People fear they won't get what they want. The most dreadful and unattractive person only needs to be loved, and they will open up like a flower.
There are different kinds of kindness. The people-pleasing kind may come across as being naive and triggers some people. Another kind of kindness is to actually care and be curious about others and that usually comes across better.
I’m a fan of the line from Ted Lasso: be curious, not judgmental. I try approach things from the perspective of “how can we solve this problem”, since I don’t see any good in finger pointing. You can’t change the past.
I’ll admit, I am a people pleaser at times, but it’s something I’ve worked on - identifying the line when I start to be too much of a pushover.
That's a good quote.
Also props for recognizing your own people-pleasing tendencies. And I'm glad to hear you've worked on it. It takes time to understand what causes us to be like that. It might be out of fear of rejection or some other unwanted outcome. And it could be based on some irrational assumptions or beliefs.
To be able to accept any outcome in any situation is very difficult, but a strong foundation for confidence and inner peace.
"Do not mistake my kindness as weakness"
Some of it is setting boundaries. If you don't stop certain behavior at the start, it just builds up, unintentionally aslo.
For example if your name is Robert, and you prefer Robert, correcting someone who called you "Bob" is the first action, otherwise they will keep doing it not knowing any better. Because if you wait til you're upset with it, they're going to take it as hostility because "you never said anything before" and you're probably pissed when you do correct them.
I don't know but sorry this is happening to you. Do not give up. It is certainly not naive, you can be most kind and firm with people, you can be kind and competent. You don't need to be an asshole to get things done (I'm sure you have figured that out already) and I find that seeing the best in people works out better more of the time, anyway.
Anger spreads. It hates everything that doesn't inflame it.
I mean no one walks over me but I do get the sorta. oh thats cute. Im not so sure im kind though as much as polite and looking at things in terms of what works and whats right.
Pessimists, like everyone else, feel that their way is the right way, and if you aren't as miserable as them, you must not be doing something right.
Reasons vary between people. It's not important. If you want to know, ask the people in question.
Don't think everyone SHOULD be doing it like you. If you feel like being upbeat, be upbeat. ACCEPT not everyone is but they don't get to force their view on you either.
It's naive to think one way is more "right" than the other.
That's just some Murican bullshit, it's what happens to people raised by reality tv
It's harder to do the right thing, it's tough to be truly kind.
Follow your heart and try to make a better world around you
People being dicks to each other is hardly an American phenomenon.
not what I said, but nice attempt at deflection
you will be seen as too trusting and people take advantage of it, and it can be your downfall. i know some people that are pushovers like that, can barely afford bills at this point.
Disagree. In my lived experience, the kindest person in the room is often the smartest.
the terrible awful no-good reality is that being kind is just objectively the most effective thing, and obviously the whole reason why us humans have become so powerful.
it's incredibly easy to show why: you have a tree with 1 apple within easy reach, do you A) give the other person a boost so they can reach all the other apples and then spend the evening gorging with your new friend, or B) FUCKING MURDER THEM and eat the one apple while you watch the life fade from their eyes?
A sane person obviously chooses A, and it's mind boggling that this has somehow become even remotely debatable.
I'd say it's seen more as a sign of insecurity and some people thrive on that. You need to set boundaries or they'll keep trying things.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoner%27s_dilemma
I think that attitude is a symptom of burnout, either with work or life as a whole. They've probably been taken advantage of and let down a number of times and have developed a mindset that good work doesn't get noticed, people don't get what they deserve, so why bother?
Not saying it's justified or healthy thinking. But when they see your attitude they might be saying internally "just wait til you've seen what I've seen"
i agree on that one very much. on my way into burnout my cynicism and sarcasm increased steadily (in a way i tried to get relief from my pressure in a socially acceptable way), and even tho colleagues found my sharp tongue funny, it was not a fun experience. I only stopped shortly before i broke down - i couldn't keep the facade up anymore, if i had tried i would have my breaking moment right there.
Some people have bad experiences where they lost trust in people and therefore treat the lack of trust as experience. That if you aren't as paranoid as they are, you don't know as much as they do.
Also, some people are bad to work with or are mediocre at their jobs, especially at communication. This is how they cover for themselves. It isn't their fault that they messed up, you didn't tell them something that they should have realized they should have asked but it is easier just to blame you.
There are many things at play in situations such as you describe. One of which is often a form of jealousy "I don't feel happy, so you shouldn't either". People often don't even realize they do this, sub conscious.
They probably don't intend to be negative, just haven't found a way to better be.
Here’s three ideas that come up:
This reminds me of the Fool’s Choice: you either lie and keep friends or you tell the truth and lose friends.
Similarly, I suppose that people who see kindness as a sign of naiveness have not learned how hostage negotiators do their work. A good hostage negotiator will act kindly, but they’re anything but naive.
Finally, I suppose whoever is deciding to ‘walk over kind people’ has lots of fears and a fragile identity they need to protect.
Let me know if you’re interested in learning about where these ideas come from.
Bullies (personality disordered) seek out the strong to "prove" themselves "strong", and perceived weak for laughs/external validation. They are afraid they have nothing of substance to offer (they don't), and rather than sit with themselves to find weaknesses and flaws (much too painful, either due to an over-indulgent -- or more often, a physically/verbally/sexually/financially abusive -- upbringing) and do the work to be better people (if they can correctly identify "better," because to them, abusive behavior seems safe and strong ["suckers and losers" = "bad, they deserve it"]).
You're going to have to be the one to protect you, I'm sorry to say. Most people don't want to risk being "trouble makers," lest they lose their jobs. You're going to have to start documenting everything, then either meet with your supervisor, but an anonymous email (not from the company device or account or connection) may be able to check that behavior. If it doesn't, you'll have to meet with your supervisor or HR. I'd strongly recommend trying to find something else, before that meeting, but have your notes photocopied to take to the meeting and try to use different language. Leave the original copy home, with a photocopy in a different place, in case one set of notes becomes lost or damaged.