Spyke
lemmy.world

"Your printer has detected 3rd party antimatter. Please only refill with Genuine HP(tm) AntiMatter cartridges. Authorities have been notified and are enroute to your residence."

49

nah, they'll just let you print antimatter ink on matter paper, and then claim that the explosion was your fault for counterfeiting

7
Infynisreply
midwest.social

Planes have to stop at the equator so everyone can get their matter jars ready to switch before they convert naturally

10

Ackshually, the plane is the matter jar. It's just super uncomfortable for the passengers if the pilot doesn't get the maneuver just right in the air, so they land and do it there instead. Sometimes they'll fly along the equator and do it slowly if they're going across the Pacific, e.g. USA -> Australia, instead of USA -> Chile

3
MudManreply
fedia.io

It's a subscription model for the artificial stuff. The natural version is dirt cheap. It's always the middle man with these modern services, I tell you.

27

These days it's all part of the Adobe Standard Model Suite. Can't even get it separately.

1
midwest.social

Why do people post things like this? And who cares? It doesn't matter; it antimatters.

49

This is just an irresponsible post.

Be careful putting matter and antimatter so close in a sentence.

You'll kill us all.

15
rockSlayerreply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

The reason why it's called antimatter is because the polarity of the nucleus and electrons are reversed. There are also antineutrons that have a neutral charge. It all still has mass, but will obliterate upon contact with regular matter

31

There are also anti neutrons that have a neutral charge

Expanding onto this, it raises the question: how is a neutron different to an anti-neutron?

A neutron can be though of a particle composed of 2 down and 1 up quarks and lot of gluon's that keep everything together. The gluon is its own antiparticle, so the antineutron has 2 anti-down quarks, 1 anti-up quarks and gluons. This way it becomes a different particle despite also being of neutral charge.

12

yes, its the same as normal, its just the "Spin of the particles that are opposite", if you get down deeper, the quarks are opposite.

5
Quilotoareply
lemmy.ca

That's a good question. Maybe it has antimass?

1

It doesn't, but if it did that'd explain why there isn't much of it around.

2
lemmy.world

1 gram of antimatter stored? Forget the explosion—imagine the insurance premium on that thing.

20

I don't know what to tell you buddy, because AI are trained on how people write on the internet?

3
0x0reply
infosec.pub

More important question, why do you think like one?

3

Just wait until we start having it manufactured in a cheap labor market. The prices will plummet! It'll likely be mostly fake, but that's the price we pay for cheap antimatter.

16

I thought it was HP inkjet printer cartridges? I think that's around $60 trillion per gram, isn't it?

16

That's so stupid: You can make antimatter at home for tree fiddy. Just buy a bunch of bananas and wait for the potassium to decay into positrons. EZ

15

Tree fid- WAIT THIS AINT NO SCIENCE MAN ITS THE GOD DAMN LOCH NESS MONSTER

4

This leads to a modified version of the uncertainty principle: either you have a banana and can know the size of something or you have positrons and are unable to measure size.

2

I didn't even know we could get a gram of anti-matter, cause don't they make it proton by proton, and they also don't exist for that long?

13
lemmy.ca

I thought element 118 was like $60 quadrillion a gram because they only manged to make like 3 atoms of it.

Edit:

  • 2.05x10^21 atoms in a gram of element 118
  • 5 atoms synthesized so far

Assuming they somehow managed to spend only $1 making every atom, that's $2,050,000,000,000,000,000,000 per gram.

8

That will be a nice addition to my periodic elements collection.

2

You're paying way too much for antimatter, man. Who's your antimatter guy?

2

Ah, that's why we haven't used it in weapons yet.

I figured because any amount of usedul antimatter annihilateing causes gamma rays that cook the planet, but $60T makes it a bit more prohibitive

5

That's just the price to get it.

The burn rate of storing it would be similarly astronomical, but reoccurring, cost.

And I can't even imagine the cost of transporting it

2
Gustephanreply
lemmy.world

Fun fact; the standard model actually allows for spontaneous particle-antiparticle pair generation, so long as the pair mutually annihilate within some hbar defined time limit and conservation laws aren't broken at a macro scale. This is the mechanism behind hawking radiation too; some of the energy given off by black holes is caused by spontaneous pair generation that happens such that one of the pair is created beyond the event horizon and the other member is created before the event horizon, causing one to be trapped and the other to be jettisoned into space.

I know that doesn't really relate to your comment about containing antimatter but I counter with the following: I'm profoundly autistic and the standard model has been a special interest of mine before. I couldn't resist the chance to infodump a bit

10

By itself no, but you could form metals from antimatter.

4

Typically when people refer to antimatter they're talking about anti-hydrogen. Theoretically you can have any anti-element, as far as I know

3