Spyke

Replies

Comment on

Amazon is reportedly training humanoid robots to deliver packages

So, from what little research I did the robots cost from 5000$ to 500000$, as most articles point out the advanced robots cost 200000-300000$. In a lot of places around the world that's like paying a human for 8-10 years. Humans are easily "replaceable", where those robots have maintenance cost additional to the initial "investment". How is that feasible in the eyes of the big money oligarchs? I genuinely don't understand the end goal here.

Comment on

protec the poor mull!

Reply in thread

I think we are too far gone... If you can't do it with all the free weapons you have on hand, how do you think it's going to work in Europe? America and the rest of the world is equally screwed. Maybe some 3rd world countries will be fine as they have greater issues than "some" privacy concerns:)

Comment on

Exclusive: Amazon plans thousands more corporate job cuts next week

Reply in thread

Don't you worry, they will make a hard cap for you and me, but politicians, billionaires, CEO, etc. will be excluded from that... People just need to watch all the anti-humans participating and speaking at the World economic forum, which is unofficial world changing platform that nobody had elected to do so, just because they are rich and powerful. Those anti-humans need to be separated from their heads.

fuck_ai

Comment on

Windows 12 Reportedly Set for Release This Year as a Fully Modular, Subscription-Based, AI-Focused OS

Reply in thread

When I started 3 years ago I was distrohopping almost every week... For gaming on Nvidia+Intel combo - arch Linux distros with kde is where I found peace... Started with endeavouros and now I use cachyos with kde plasma. Both are quite good. I have installed limine+ Snapper and this does system snapshot on each update. Never needed it though and every time I am updating irresponsibly. Gl, install any Linux.

Comment on

The GUARD Act Isn’t Targeting Dangerous AI—It’s Blocking Everyday Internet Use

Reply in thread

While you have a right, I don't agree with your statement. It is literally written at the front of most chatbots that they they can make mistakes and are for entertainment purposes only, but people still go and off themselves or spiral into psychotic episodes.

So something needs to be done obviously and it is not the age verification that they are trying to push.

Comment on

*Permanently Deleted*

Reply in thread

I was also thinking the same, but they don't really need to enforce it proactively. By making it "illegal", they can just pick up people they don't like and force them to unlock it. If they don't - believe it or not, straight to jail. Basically what is happening now in many countries, but legal.

You reached the end