Spyke

Some changes, and Boosters vs Doomers

I want to apologize for changing the description without telling people first. After reading arguments about how AI has been so overhyped, I'm not that frightened by it. It's awful that it hallucinates, and that it just spews garbage onto YouTube and Facebook, but it won't completely upend society. I'll have articles abound on AI hype, because they're quite funny, and gives me a sense of ease knowing that, despite blatant lies being easy to tell, it's way harder to fake actual evidence.

I also want to factor in people who think that there's nothing anyone can do. I've come to realize that there might not be a way to attack OpenAI, MidJourney, or Stable Diffusion. These people, which I will call Doomers from an AIHWOS article, are perfectly welcome here. You can certainly come along and read the AI Hype Wall Of Shame, or the diminishing returns of Deep Learning. Maybe one can even become a Mod!

Boosters, or people who heavily use AI and see it as a source of good, ARE NOT ALLOWED HERE! I've seen Boosters dox, threaten, and harass artists over on Reddit and Twitter, and they constantly champion artists losing their jobs. They go against the very purpose of this community. If I hear a comment on here saying that AI is "making things good" or cheering on putting anyone out of a job, and the commenter does not retract their statement, said commenter will be permanently banned. FA&FO.

View original on lemmy.world

For Starters

Alright, I just want to clarify that I've never modded a Lemmy community before. I just have the mantra of "if nobody's doing the right thing, do it yourself". I was also motivated by the decision from u/spez to let an unknown AI company use Reddit's imagery. If you know how to moderate well, please let me know. Also, feel free to discuss ways to attack AI development, and if you have evidence of AIBros being cruel and remorseless, make sure to save the evidence for people "on the fence". Remember, we don't know if AI is unstoppable. AI uses up loads of energy to be powered, and tons of circuitry. There may very well be an end to this cruelty, and it's up to us to begin that end.

View original on lemmy.world

Why Amazon Dropped Its OpenAI Movie; Data Center Workers Are Fighting Back [Podcast][32mins]

This week, the team discusses Amazon’s controversial decision to drop Luca Guadagnino’s film about OpenAI’s Sam Altman — which reportedly did not paint him in a favorable light. Alongside Google DeepMind’s $75 million brand new partnership with indie film studio A24, how much of a dent is AI actually having in the films we see? They also discuss the recent upheaval of workers — from electricians to software engineers — against data centers. Plus: Meta’s program to track employees’ data gets paused after a massive leak, and Anthropic is now getting along with the government thanks to CEO Dario Amodei no longer being in the room.

Why Amazon Dropped Its OpenAI Movie; Data Center Workers Are Fighting Back [Podcast][32mins]https://play.prx.org/listen?ge=prx_5901_8a8c1566-bbd5-4d63-bef1-8641d7c03771&uf=https%3A%2F%2Fpublicfeeds.net%2Ff%2F5901%2Fgadget-labOpen linkView original on lemmy.dbzer0.com
fuck_ai·Fuck AIbyBrownie

Research in AI

I've been very fed up with AI for about past 6 months, completely started to boycott it, discuss it with people of all kinds of different views, and I found joy and pride once again in my own work.

But the world issues coming from AI, and even more so from the billionaires and empires behind it seem to further pile up to insane heights. I've been trying to learn more and more about it, and after my bachelor and masters I am considering pursuing phd and research surrounding AI, especially from the critical perspective, which seems to be deeply neglected in the research pov.

This is still a few years in the future, and lot could change, but I am curious what do people here think about pursuing such a thing, and if in current academic world it is even something that would be possible doing, given lot of the grants and funding of AI research comes from these companies that just want to gain even more power through it.

As I said, I am already trying to know as much as possible about it, but I would like to look more deeply into its impact on society, impact on students etc.

Do you think this would be a worthwile endevaour? And if not, where do you think I should be heading to make change about this while not completely starving to death?

View original on lemmy.zip

I sat behind someone on a plane who was using ChatGPT to write the materials and remarks for a sustainability and climate conference.

I tried to post this to Reddit but for some reason it keeps getting removed by filters. I normally just lurk on Lemmy but I decided to make an account because I’m so over that stupid platform.

ANYWAY

Last night on my flight home I noticed that the person in front of me was using ChatGPT. I got nosy so I looked closer and found out that they were actually using ChatGPT to write the content for a program of a sustainability and climate conference. They specifically included a section about “dirty” energy sources and the harm that results from energy producers supplying data centers. I was floored.

I am not sure if this was the final product or just a draft, but I find it pretty gross and ironic that the AI that is fueling the climate crisis and responsible for the rapid development of data centers that are doing irreparable damage to local communities and ecosystems is being employed to create the materials for a sustainability conference. Maybe start with looking in the mirror first?

I looked up the company, and turns out this program might be part of a Keynote Livestream that is featuring the Mayor of San Fransisco lol.

View original on lemmy.world

Data center that vowed to avoid Colorado River water is now suing for 260 million gallons per year

Questions are mounting around a proposed artificial intelligence data center in California's Imperial Valley because its developer is now seeking Colorado River water, despite earlier saying the project would avoid drawing from the drought-stressed river.

KPBS reported that Imperial Valley Computer Manufacturing has gone to court to secure 260 million gallons of water per year from the Imperial Irrigation District — about 750,000 gallons a day — for a planned artificial intelligence complex in the desert.

Data center that vowed to avoid Colorado River water is now suing for 260 million gallons per yearhttps://www.thecooldown.com/green-business/ai-data-center-imperial-valley-water-demand/Open linkView original on lemmy.dbzer0.com