Spyke

Replies

Comment on

If your art trained the AI, MIT says you may never be able to prove it

Reply in thread

That’s not how AI works. It isn’t like copying and pasting previous patterns exactly. It is a compressed (kind of representation) of the original. Similar to how our memories work. Imagine the mona lisa, you can probably imagine key features, eyes, nose, hair smile. But you probably don’t remember every detail of the background. Models don’t store the exact original. So it isn’t technically plagiarism.

Now can you argue that it is? Maybe, but a model not trained to specifically recreate the mona lisa is very unlikely to produce a replica of it but it “knows” features of the mona lisa. So it could apply a similar smile or look to another “known” set of faces.

If a painter has seen a photograph and later blindly creates a similar image that isn’t plagiarism, is it? Maybe I am wrong.

Comment on

*Permanently Deleted*

The thing about quantum immortality is that as you age and you start running out of timelines, the circumstances for you to still be alive get weirder and weirder.

Imagine you are 90 and are about to die in all other timelines and the only way you survive is for aliens to show up with a cure for death.

funny

Comment on

Fixing her

I always imagined that women would make the best assassins. People tend to put their guard down when there is a pretty girl around. And they can get men alone. They all just so happen to get heart attacks around her. She’s that good!

fuck_ai

Comment on

Arizona students boo former Google CEO Eric Schmidt as he talks about AI during graduation speech

Glad he’s getting booed. In this clip he’s saying things that are potentially true about AI. The biggest problem though is that assholes like him will be the ones designing AI. They want to own the source of all information to shape the world as they wish it to be.

They already own the media, now their AI will be what they want it to be, say what they want it to say.