Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world

13 replies

fedia.io

Is this article slop? They say "As the Wall Street Journal reported..." and then link to the Washington Post.

18

Futurism's reporting is anti-AI to a fault (as in making outlandish headlines out of nothing) so that would surprise me.

4
lemmy.world

They can’t. He owns a controlling stake in the company. He could fire all of them.

8
fedia.io

He could, but then the stockholders would likely throw a costly lawsuit at the company for poor governance.

3

Which is why he won’t unless they try to force his hand. Instead he’ll play politics and maybe fire 1 if he needs to stop a rebellion.

4

It's almost like dual class stock structures that give founders perpetual veto power over their boards might not be the best idea.

7

It can go both ways.

Him having the control to do things like this and having the vision for it can allow for big breakthroughs. People might shut something down early rather than persever otherwise.

They can also fail spectacularly when they cant be stopped

1
lemmy.world

Didn't they just help him prepare to pay that one time billionaire tax? Parasites, all of them.

4

You reached the end

Behind the Scenes, Meta's Board Is Battling With Mark Zuckerberg Over His Out-of-Control AI Spending | Spyke