And how about you? Do you have the hard originals of every book? Why do you suddenly care only now that books are being copied?? They've been getting scanned for half a century now. You only care now to be outraged about it something for today

"let them eat horse"

where did you put that pesky guillotine?

And we used copiers and voice recorders for that since before computers. That has been used since the 70s. Even earlier.

scanning that and adding it to the common knowledge and making it accessible is something we've been doing since computers were a thing decades before today.

Students now still use recordings that can be parsed into text.

Suddenly it's an issue now because someone needs so badly to be outraged by literally everything that can be distorted into a rage bait title like this one.

"gullible"

hurry, you better take up reading books to learn the meaning of these words you're using before the AI 'destroys' the useless copy you never wanted nor thought about until now.

Humans have been scanning books for decades. All books created today exist electronically before (a copy) gets physically printed of a book that remains existing.

Type writers are a museum piece. not a utility anymore. Calm down.

so your idea is installing a system is pushing for classism and hoping to furthering socioeconomic downturn on the landscape of select neighbourhoods with select individuals with large populations that are struggling, paying the most taxes, yet expected to travel for lower wage jobs and you want to make their travel to work harder.

how bigotted.

Read it again. Post says AI. all AI not just LLM.

like i said: shallow political opinions. just so you idiots can rage bait. this is pathetic.

destroying (A) physical copy. in order to copy the (1) copy of a book(which most new already exist as pdf). kinda like how people do it when they scan the book. which has been happening for decades now to make knowledge permanent.

far cry from "destroying all books" which these rage bait titles suggest. we arent standing around a pit of fire.

bigger tragedy is how humans seem shittier at communication as AI learns. probably a more accurate title.

Safety? They constantly put innocent victims at risk by misidentifying them as the criminals!!!

Odd description of 'safety'

holy fuck i know trump apparently doesnt do drugs but what the fuck is that choad smokin

more users but not more bots like redbot

I see. So using it to cure cancer has to be stopped in its tracks now cuz you had a shallow political opinion.

s...so he's saying it wasnt worth getting poor and broken just to pown the dems? like maybe his best interests in his vote were a little off?

so the next step canada goes is full french?

zzzzZzzZzz

this logic asssumes more road == population growth

sure, and telescopes created all the stars in the sky.

and yet that is not denying i made a good point. the mistake you made here is you think i care about getting a rando internet stranger's approval over my parameters of how i must survive and succeed. and boy did i hand you a good one if all your comeback here was just about how much i didnt kiss your specific ass enough.

so if perverts are not allowed on school property and it is considered private space for that reason...

so who is enforcing that law?

the fuck happened to this society? everyone just seems to be victims all the time. no doers.

yes i think it belongs in the same category as hoarders. the moment you go over the means you need to survive/accumulsting more than you can use in a lifetime it should be considered a mental illness and should be treated as such.

tax the rich btw