He didn't say the service was "not so exciting". He said "I didn't think it was a good service, no" and "they could do much better" (source). I know it's not a huge deal, but I'm fucking tired of the media misreporting and softening his statements.

Unrelated to the message - that's a bad use of the meme, doesn't fit at all.

You never brush your teeth? It's not only good for health dude

biologically speaking, the children of rich parents are much more likely to be born rich themselves

Bro, what? Biologically speaking? What are you talking about?
The kids of rich people are rich because their parents are rich. They grow up to be rich because they have their parents wealth, which they either use to create more, or just stay rich.
The fact that they're rich has nothing to do with their "biology".

What are you proposing anyway? That only rich people procreate and then somehow eventually everyone will be rich? If you can do simple math like addition and subtraction, you'll realize that that scenario is not possible.

Spreading defeatist comments and pessimism, saying that this won't accomplish anything anyway and undermining the power of the collective is exactly what killed this movement in Croatia.

The movement started with a general spending boycott on fridays (so no money transactions - no stores, bars, gas stations, bank transactions etc), and a week long boycott of three supermarket chains that had the most egregious prices compared to other countries (those chains operate all over Europe, and their prices in other countries are far cheaper for the exact same products - despite lower operational costs in Croatia). After that, we switched to boycotting one chain every week.

The boycott was very effective. On the first friday of the boycott, the state financial department reported a 43% decrease in sales volume in the country. Just think about that for a second. And no - there has not been an increase in spending in the days before or after the boycott. In fact, they were still lower compared to the weeks before and the sales volume decreased in the following week by about 10%.

But like I said, unfortunately it died out over the next 4-5 weeks, with each boycott achieving lower decreases. And it died out exactly because of trolls that spread this defeatist attitude thinking they're so smart for seeing the "real" picture. Laughable.
Of course, the astroturfing has been insane, they really went berserk after the first friday. There's been an insane amount of bots posting comments that this doesn't work, that we should be protesting the government instead (as if holding signs in front of government buildings hurts them more than 50% less money flowing into the state piggy bank), that this hurts the citizens more than the conglomerates, that this will cause them to increase the prices to cover the losses etc etc. Just ridiculous claims all over social media.
And yeah, people got deflated and the movement died out.

Thanks idiots.

They trusted America too. Fatal mistake.

I mean, bikes are great for a lot of things and cities should definitely have the infrastructure to support their usage, but let's not pretend that they can easily replace cars in every use case.
Cars are faster, cover long distances which are just infeasible for bikes, are more comfortable, can be used in bad weather, and are needed for people with disabilities. Granted, all of those use cases should be covered by a good public transport system, but that's exactly why cars are considered to be the symbol of freedom - not depending on the bus/train schedules, weather, distance etc.

So funny the way he ends the call with "okay great, great, okay bye bye", like he's talking to an aunt or something lol

When I was a kid, they were common on summer nights. But I don't see them at all anymore, it must have been like 15 years since I saw them last. What is driving them extinct?

Same thing that happened with Canada. This man is so stupid it's coming full circle

Weird to hear tartare described as "adventurous" food lol.

It's pretty standard in Europe. Like my dad made it a couple of times at home for us.

slightly worst off

worse* off

Same

I seriously can't deal with google search anymore, I swear I can't find anything.
It's like it replaces my search terms with something more common (sometimes even completely unrelated) and runs the search with that. It's fucking ridiculous. Keyword search doesn't work at all anymore, and writing fucking sentences like it suggests you to leads to completely shit results. I just don't get it.
I noticed a change like this some 10 or so years ago. It used to be pretty simple, just an index search. And it was pretty reliable, you just had to get the hang of it. But I noticed they changed something because that didn't work so well anymore, so I switched up my search style to be more like you would expect people new to computers to have. Kinda annoying, and not as effective, especially for edge cases (some obscure searches) but for those it seemed to somewhat fall back to the old method.
But now, nothing works anymore. Honestly it fucking infuriates me sometimes, I can't find anything. If you want something specific, fucking forget it. More than three specifications and it shows you just 5 results??? What the fuck is with that? And not good results mind you. any less specific and it shows you generic, not applicable answers. I tried everything, it's useless beyond the most general questions.

So yeah, I kinda went off on a rant there, but the point of the comment is, is qwant (or any other alternative) similar to old google and can actually search by keywords?

Why would you restrict who's allowed to read the publications based on the "credibility" of the reader?

That's not the problem, the problem is that the journals legally restrict you from making your publication openly accessible.

Not "about Twitter" but "about as much as Twitter"

But doesn't this already exist? For most packages I get, I can choose to either have them delivered to my door or to a package station, where I put my delivery number in and it unlocks the compartment my package is in. Same for sending packages.

Here's an example:
.

I'm in Europe though, not sure if it's a thing in the US.

I honestly feel like I'm going crazy. Everybody is constantly telling me that LLMs are so good and capable, and a lot of people even consider them superior and talk about that like it's a known fact. But I just don't see it.

I tried to use them lot of times, but the results were simply not good and I always end up just wasting my time. And everybody is always like "well you have to write the right prompts, they have to be like this and this" or "well it might be that you're not using the right model, try this and this model" or whatever.

One guy even suggested that I might not be advanced enough to recognize it as good code, because again, LLMs are just so good and that's a fact. Which, to be fair, I fully admit to not being advanced or very experienced, especially in C++ which I am currently using and trying to learn. So I'm not rejecting this notion outright, it might actually be true. Although, I am experienced and I'd even say advanced in Python, and there I can say for sure that the code written by LLMs is just bad, convoluted, and unmaintainable.

A lot of times that I talk to people about this and explain my experience, and manage to convince them that I tried different prompts, models and everything, they always land on the same conclusion - that the code doesn't actually have to be readable and maintainable. LLMs are a new interface for coding, thus the code only has to be good enough for the LLM to be able to work with it.

And I honestly can't even say that this is such a ridiculous idea. That may very well be the path we're headed towards. And if that is the case, then my insisting on not using LLMs just puts me at a disadvantage since I'm much less productive (assuming that people who use LLMs are actually more productive - which I haven't seen conclusive studies about). I've read a little about this topic on reddit and stuff, and a lot of people really do agree with this - if you don't use LLMs, you're just too slow and it will only get worse. And this is coming from people who are (claiming to be) experienced software devs.

My situation is a little bit different though - I'm writing research code and I definitely DO have to be able to read and debug the code. If I don't, my results might be completely false and come from bugs or wrong functionalities. So I strongly reject using LLMs in my code, at least in the 95% of the code that actually implements my methodology.

But even still, I haven't had success with getting good code out of LLMs for the 5% that doesn't deal with the research, so what the hell is going on? I seriously feel like I'm going crazy since it seems to me like I'm the only one who isn't satisfied with the "capabilities" of LLMs. I can admit that my prompting needs work and that I don't exactly put much effort into it, but at some point, where do you draw the line? How many paragraphs do I have to write to ensure that the LLM does exactly what I want, before it becomes more work than actually doing it myself? I swear, some of the tips I get from people on prompting are crazy - writing .md files with instructions, writing out every single detail, explaining exactly how to do it and on and on and on. Its honestly easier and quicker just doing it myself.

And another thing - when did it happen that people stopped being embarrassed about heavily using LLMs to code?? Like this just flipped at some point and now people proudly talk about not having written a single line of code in a project (and I mean this literally, I've had multiple people tell me this). I cringe so hard every time in these conversations.

So I really have no idea what to think anymore. In any case, I won't be using LLMs in my research because the main goal is for me to actually learn something, as well as to produce reliable code and results. I'm still early in my research, so there's no problem with me doing that right now. But there will probably come a time where I will have learned enough about the topic to allow for "blackbox" code because I will be able to verify the functionalities and results, and I certainly expect higher pressure to use LLMs then. I have no idea what I'll do then.

But what about housing? If you live in a shoebox with no hope of getting a larger place, it's unlikely that you're gonna have kids.