Comment on
It Took 23 Days for Lemmy Posts to Double from 1 Million to 2 Million
Impressive, I guess, but how many of those 2 million posts have a single comment? If 90% of these are just bots reposting things from Reddit with no further engagement…
Comment on
It Took 23 Days for Lemmy Posts to Double from 1 Million to 2 Million
Impressive, I guess, but how many of those 2 million posts have a single comment? If 90% of these are just bots reposting things from Reddit with no further engagement…
Comment on
Rule
Reply in thread
But aren’t jokes supposed to be like, funny or something?
Comment on
I wish people would write some descriptions for their communities
This was a problem on reddit too, and it looks like it’s carried over here. People make new communities and just assume that everyone in the future who finds it will just automatically know the purpose.
Comment on
Has vlemmy.net lost its domain name?
Dude, this sucks. I signed up for a couple of instances, but that was my main one.
So if it’s gone and unable to come back are all those comments and posts we made there just gone?
Comment on
Americans think the American dream is dying
Reply in thread
I disagree, back in the 60s it was totally possible to find a decent paying job, have a couple of kids, buy a house to store them in, get a new car every few years, send your kids off to school, go on vacations and retire at an age old enough to enjoy some time with the grandkids. Now that really isn’t a reality for the average person.
Comment on
What do you think is the best solution to having the same named communities on different instances?
Another kink to think about is what if you have different communities with the same name on different servers with completely different content. Like what if the trees subreddit came to a server and created a marijuana themed community called trees, but then another server wanted to discuss actual trees so they called theirs trees too. Wouldn’t want those two being grouped together automatically.
Comment on
Kevin Mitnick has died.
Reply in thread
updoot
Can that “word” please die with Reddit?
Comment on
Bail
Yeah, that’s not really what bail is and this will confuse people who don’t know.
Paying bail money doesn’t reduce time off your sentence, it makes it to where you don’t have to spend the duration of your trial in jail. After the trial, you’ll still have to spend the same amount of time in jail as you would have if you paid bail or not. Also, you get back your bail money at the end of trial as long as you don’t flee.
Comment on
What is this huge road (rail?) track seen from a flight somewhere near the New Mexico/Texas border? [SOLVED]
I used a reverse google image search and found out it’s the Goodyear proving grounds in San Angelo, TX
Comment on
Free In-flight WiFi and Internet (Tested: Southwest Airlines US)
Reply in thread
So you passed math but failed reading, eh?
Comment on
"Both parties are the same!"
Reply in thread
Of the two major parties, the GOP is far closer to what you’re describing. If it wasn’t for fear mongering, the GOP wouldn’t have anything at all to go off of. Bad things will happen like, immigrants flooding the borders, socialism raising your taxes, your kids being taught to be gay, etc. “Vote for us or bad things will happen” might as well be the official slogan of the GOP. Either that or “White Christians good, everyone else, bad”. Take your pick.
Comment on
Dear Lemmy, **why** Star Trek??
Reply in thread
hasn't been successfully brought into the mainstream
Wat?
Comment on
The elitist attitudes surrounding Apple products is so unbelievable.
I have an iPhone, and I don’t think I’m better than anyone else.
Well, except for people who judge other people based on what type of phone they carry. Those people are douchebags.
Comment on
Apple TV vs Firestick.
Apple TV doesn’t have ads at all. If that’s all you care about, I would say go for that.
The Firestick isn’t really jailbreakable per se, but it doesn’t really need to be. You can sideload things with extreme ease. There’s a pretty decent app that allows you to watch YouTube with no ads or sponsored content shown. That alone is worth the cost of a Firestick for me. It does have some ads in the menu, but they’re not super obtrusive and never bothered me much. Plus the cost is much lower. You used to be able to put a different launcher on the Firestick and never see any Amazon content at all (ads) but they fixed that a while back and I haven’t bothered to see if that works again, but for all I know it might.
Edit: it does.
Comment on
Has vlemmy.net lost its domain name?
Reply in thread
I just wish I could access my account settings, which look like they are stored on the server instead of the app I use. I had already blocked several hundred communities that I wasn’t interested in and I don’t look forward to re-blocking them again (ok, maybe I look forward to it just a little bit, I might have a problem)
Comment on
A Year Since Its Release, Sony Seems to Have Abandoned PlayStation VR2
Reply in thread
For the record, I only downvoted you because of the multiple edits whining about being downvoted.
That’s like watching porn with your parents level of cringe right there.
Comment on
87% Missing: the Disappearance of Classic Video Games | Video Game History Foundation
I feel like the term “completely unavailable” isn’t really the term they should be using here. Maybe “not currently being monetized” would be a better choice?
Comment on
Edit: Rule has been replaced.
Reply in thread
They’re so overused because there’s so many of you displaying that behavior.
But by all means, making it to where people can’t call you out on your shit is definitely the best way to deal with the problem. Full on head in the sand moment, right here.
Comment on
[Meta] Can we please chill with the "This is an old post from some other site" titles and actually use something descriptive about the meme itself?
Reply in thread
To clarify, the reposting doesn’t bother me at all. I have the memory of a goldfish when it comes to things like this and even when It’s something I know I’ve seen before, I still don’t mind unless it’s literally something I’ve seen dozens of times before and it’s been reposted within the last day or so. Reposting isn’t the problem here, and I disagree with your assessment that most communities frown upon them. Sure, you usually get 1-2 people whining about how they’ve seen this content before, but I have to think those people are in the slim minority. If this was a place for all new, never before seen, original content, that would be in the rules. It isn’t.
I also disagree when you say reposts aren’t creative, or I guess I disagree that all content posted here needs to be super creative. This site and Reddit are aggregators and exist solely for people to post things they found amusing or funny. There’s no reason to slam someone’s creativity just because they saw something they were amused by and wanted to share it with people who would likely be amused by it too. It doesn’t have to be any more complicated than that.
I just wanted some descriptive thread titles so I have an idea what I’ll be seeing when I click on something. I wasn’t trying to insult anyone’s effort by making that request and I apologize to any posters who thought that’s what I was doing.
Comment on
What is something that sounds 100% true but is actually 100% false?
Reply in thread
It depends on if you’re talking about left vs right politicians or left vs right political viewpoints. If you’re talking about viewpoints, I absolutely disagree with what you’re saying. If you’re talking about politicians, especially in the US, then sadly, you’re mostly correct. The left say they want to make tons of changes but when push comes to shove, there’s enough money in politics to stop any real changes from happening no matter which party is supposedly in charge.