There's nuance. Obviously, vote for the liberal over the fascist, it's not even close. However, the fascists are absolutely represented in government, while there's no leftist candidates to speak of. Leftists have to plug their nose and vote liberal, while fascists gleefully vote republican.
Voting is entirely for loss prevention, because ultimately it absolutely impacts minority groups and people who stand to lose a great deal by a republican victory. However, leftists will not be able to move America to the left by voting.
That's why grassroots movements and building up of parallel structures are so important for leftism, it cannot work within the confines of a 2 party Capitalist state, and must be built from the bottom up.
You said there’s nuance but then went on to explain that there isn’t nuance and the only reasonable vote is for Biden. And you’re not wrong. There are a lot of folks pretending to be on the left acting like there’s a whole lot of nuance here, and that voting for someone other than Biden, or not voting at all, is an acceptable option.
None of this precludes advocating for your positions or doing other praxis, but when it comes to voting the answer is clear
That is true, but not voting or casting a protest vote right now ensures fascism, under which there will be literally no choice at all.
At least under a democracy there are chances to improve things, like replacing FPTP with a better voting system that will actually allow the left a seat at the table. That’s already happening in some places and there’s a movement (supported by democrats and vehemently opposed by republicans) to enact alternative voting methods.
Unfortunately there’s been so much apathy for decades that the fascists have got their foot solidly in the door. There was nuance years ago, but we squandered it. There’s little point debating left vs liberal when fascism has taken hold. That must be stopped first.
There’s no such thing as moral neutrality in this environment, and as much as it sucks, not voting against fascism is the same as voting for fascism.
Hence my original point, leftists must vote for liberals, even if it isn't ever going to improve the system, and must work themselves to build up leftist structures without hoping for help from liberals. If they don't vote, then fascists take power, and leftists lose the chance to build leftist structures at all.
I do think you're too hopeful that a 2 party Capitalist state designed to change as little as possible would meaningfully improve from within, rather than under pressure from without, but it would be great if you were right about that.
I’m not that hopeful that the left can change the system from within, to be honest, I’m just certain it’s too late to think about that because under fascist rule, not only will things not improve, but many of us will face genocide.
The time for leftist change was 20 years ago, or with any luck, 8 or so years from now after the fascist threat has been quashed. Right now we have to think about unifying like it’s 1932.
Only thing I disagree with is the idea that leftist change was more possible 20 years ago, Capitalism's instability and inherent structural flaws only make themselves more apparent and severe as time goes on, and with that comes potential for change. The left is larger than ever before, and is constantly growing.
That’s already happening in some places and there’s a movement (supported by democrats and vehemently opposed by republicans) to enact alternative voting methods.
eta: I’m on mobile so searching and linking is hard, but you can find people running for office who support these efforts by googling the office (senator, mayor, or whatever) and ‘free vote initiative’ or some synonyms. There are some (mostly local) republicans, substantially more democrats, and a huge majority of 3rd party candidates for obvious reasons).
I strongly recommend bringing it up with your representatives. 3rd party and democrats have been teaming up for this, and republicans have been fighting it because FPTP greatly benefits them and they know it.
Reread the original comment. It's absolutely important to vote as loss prevention, but you're never going to get meaningful systemic change towards the left via voting.
Vote to protect, actually make grassroots movements like unionizing and organizing to move to the left.
Reread the original comment. It's absolutely important to vote as loss prevention, but you're never going to get meaningful systemic change towards the left via voting.
Vote to protect, actually make grassroots movements like unionizing and organizing to move to the left.
I suppose it might look that way if you aren't a minority or a woman or gay. If nothing meaningful has changed in the last 100 years, then we could go back to the policies of the 1900s-1920s without any difference. And I very much doubt anyone wants to do that, because there are very big differences.
"Am I so out of touch? No, it's the voters who are wrong."
No, it's more like "LOL you have to vote for me, or the fascist will win". Democrats love opponents like Trump, because he helps them fundraise like crazy.
Voting for someone other than Biden or not voting is an absolutely acceptable option, and I’m not pretending to be a leftist when I do so. I have Ranked Choice Voting in my state, but even if I didn’t, I would vote for who I most want in office because I have no faith in either democrats or republicans to fix the most important issues currently plaguing 99% of the people. Vilifying people for voting third party — when third parties are currently the only viable presidential and congressional solution apart from a violent revolution — is misguided.
Democrats are not your friends; you deserve better.
Leftist 3rd parties split votes between leftists and the more conservative liberals (who are the vast majority), increasing the chance of a Republican victory. I fully support right-wing people voting Libertarian though :)
With the politics of the U.S. population, and violent revolution would likely be fascist.
Just a random note: Most proper libertarians (not those weird tea party fucks) make Democrats look positively authoritarian on social issues. Economics, no, but social? Absolutely.
True. I considered myself a libertarian when I was in high school (mostly for cannabis legalization and guns, lol). Then, some of my first job experiences were pretty bad (persistent wage theft on multiple jobs, an owner coercing sex from minors, etc), and started becoming more of a leftist.
I get that. Libertarians have a bad habit of downplaying economic hardship by saying that markets will solve themselves. Maybe there's a world in which that might work, but it isn't this one.
I do think that some progressive influencers know that the DNC is much closer to the GOP on social issues. Attacking libertarians is, in my opinion, a calculated lie designed to distract from that fact.
This is very well written and well said. If we want change that doesn't come from working within the Democrats, we have to build our own robust party across all 50 states, drawing on strong local support. No one outside of the two parties is currently trying to do this, which speaks volumes about the Green and Libertarian Parties.
Leftists really have no choice other than to vote Democrat. We have to protect people who would be targeted by Republicans. We fundamentally go against left wing values if we don't. I cannot call myself liberal or leftist or wherever in-between if I sit out an election where innocent people will suffer if one of the candidates wins.
I like how you've phrased this -- voting for Biden isn't because you necessarily like his policies or viewpoints, but because you want to protect people from Trump and the Republicans. I'd love if we didn't have to worry about fascists, but we don't have that luxury. As long as they're a hair's breadth away from power, we pick the option that opposes them.
Exactly. There's one terminally online radlib here that I blocked because they were just shit-slinging for daring to suggest both voting Biden and unionizing, organizing, protesting, etc. As a leftist, we must work from without the Democratic party.
Speaking purely from a leftist perspective, I'm actually of the opinion that Anarchist principles of building up parallel structures actually may be more applicable to the American political climate, even if you're more of a Council Communist, Libertarian Socialist, Marxist-Leninist, etc. The US is seeing rising Unionization, and dramatic impacts from it, so I think Syndicalism actually has some revolutionary potential, unlike waiting for a Vanguard Party a la MLism.
It's funny, I thought that unions had passed their usefulness, and we needed a new structure to effectively push CEOs. And then the UAW and SAG proved me completely wrong, and I'm glad for it.
I think either way, you have the perfect viewpoint on this. Voting won't work to create change, but that doesn't mean you just ignore voting. You use it to protect what we have from fascists while initiating change from a new organization built from the ground up.
I'm extremely anticapitalist, and Unions are currently the best way for Workers to protect their own interests within current structures, and have the potential to replace current Capitalist ownership. A full replacement of Capitalist structures will be necessary eventually, but Unionization can be an arm to muscle that change through.
We have to protect people who would be targeted by Republicans.
How's that going? Republicans are enacting all manner of bigoted policy. What are the Democrats doing to reverse their hateful shit at the federal level?
I’d love if we didn’t have to worry about fascists, but we don’t have that luxury. As long as they’re a hair’s breadth away from power, we pick the option that opposes them.
We don't have that option. We have Democrats, who will always care more about decorum and procedural bullshit than they ever will about protecting anyone.
They don't have the numbers in Congress necessary to take federal action. It's a vicious circle -- people don't think they're doing enough, so they don't vote for them. As a result, they don't have the numbers necessary to actually affect change. And then people don't think they're doing enough, and so forth. The justice department is suing states at least, but I agree that's nowhere near enough.
If you have a way to get 60 Senate votes to protect minorities (or 50-51 who also are willing to overturn the filibuster) and the House majority, I'm all for it, and you have my support. In the absence of that, any action we take will be inadequate, no matter who is in office.
And Democrats may not be perfect, but a vote that doesn't go to fascists is a win in my book. I also think we should try to maintain norms and decorum for as long as possible -- if we can beat back fascism without compromising on our institutions, we emerge as a much stronger democracy than if we have to break the rules. If that's what it takes to stop fascists though, then so be it. I just worry that you end up in a French Revolution type situation where there's no stable governance because everyone's given up on the rules.
We're not going to get rid of the two party system without switching to a proportional representation system. I have my preference for America (5 seat districts with proportional approval voting) but any reasonable proportional system will do.
That's why you pull a reverse Sinema. Lie your ass off and pretend to be the most corporate corpodem that ever sold out. You'll only have to fight one major party instead of both of them to get elected, then you can move as far to the left as you want, so long as you avoid small aircraft.
Even there, though, even as a president, you can't meaningfully move much without the support of the party. The difference for fascists is that the Republican party legitimately has a ton of actual fascists, so fascist presidents are extremely dangerous. If a Socialist led the DNC, it would be spoiled and wouldn't have much of a chance to move left.
If I was a fascist, I'd vote Dem - fascism just gets more traction with liberals in the Waffle House, and Dems are utterly ineffective at actually doing anything to stop fascism anyway. It was Trump whipping the fascists into a froth while a lib was in the Waffle House that brought antifa into the streets - not Trump actually humiliating himself on a daily basis in the Offal Office.
Fascists just gets more from a Dem regime - the Dems are doing a fine job strengthening fascist institutions. If Pig City was being constructed under Trump, the resistance to it would be ten times stronger.
None of this means you are wrong, of course (you're not) - but if voting can stop fascists it simply means the political institutions aren't ready to hand power over to them just yet. They are working on it, though.
but there legitimately are fascists in the republican party.
Doesn't matter. The actual fascists doesn't matter. The thing to be concerned about isn't the fascists themselves - what matters is the liberals that will hand power to the fascists if their precious status quo is threatened enough.
The thing about fascists that nobody except leftists seem to understand is that fascists serve a very distinct purpose in the classical liberal nation-state - they don't exist in a vacuum as some kind of "aberration". Fascism cannot exist without threatened capitalists funding them. Fascism cannot exist without liberals handing power to them to maintain their precious "Law & Order."
There is no such thing as "grass-roots fascism" - it's all coming from above.
It makes sense, but I think the downvotes are from people feeling like this is victim blaming as opposed to recognizing what you're actually saying.
It's not Johnny Democrat going to the polls that's allowing fascists to take power, it's Joe Manchin protecting his own wealth by "allowing" a "friendly fascist" to take power, or pass a bill, if it means stopping a Bernie Sanders from taking office or stopping a popular bill that would cost him potential profit. Unless I'm the one who's misunderstanding lol
No, you're not. If voting could undo fascism it wouldn't exist. If the wants of the majority of people in the US actually counted the US would be a place we couldn't even imagine in this reality - and so would the rest of the world.
downvotes are from people
I got the exact same response in 2016 as well... even leftists who should have known better hysterically accused me of "accelerationsim" for stating that a Trump presidency would energize the left - which it did (mysteriously, without any "accelerationism" on my part at all).
I don't blame them... people are grasping at straws. It was the same in 2016.
yes, we could have preserved basic human rights for women by just voting for them directly when we had the chance, but it's much more entertaining for me if a bunch of people suffer needlessly to achieve the same goal
How fucking privileged can you be? This isn't a fucking game. Grow the fuck up.
millions of people will die if Trump wins a second term.
Probably. And if the US political establishment actually manages to dig out a competent fascist, many, many more than that will die or have their lives destroyed (which has never been an unusual thing in the US at all - or anywhere the US does "foreign policy").
Your problem isn't Trump. There's a lot more (and much viler) where he came from. Your problem is the political establishment that allows his existence - will they be allowing you to vote on that any time soon?
The problem is a contingent of poorly educated small brained white trash who very incorrectly believe trump can help them out of their sorry economic conditions (in fact he actually helped make them poorer). The problem is lack of education and lack of humanity that is very evident in the responses posted on this forum.l
The problem is a contingent of poorly educated small brained white trash
Oh... so you are placing the blame for the failure of your faux-democratic capitalism on white people who have the least economic power of all white people in the US?
I wonder... if we were to look at the socio-economic background of the average alt-right supporter - what would we find, liberal?
Trump has plainly stated he will destroy anyone who doesn't cast a vote for him this time around. If that isn't frightening, you need to check your pulse.
Well according to recent articles in USA Today and the local Tribune, we do have the votes now. The current polling shows Biden way ahead among the popular votes. We are entitled to everyone of them, thanks for agreeing with me on that.
Lol! It's quite hysterical - the one minute I'm arguing with people who don't believe anything in the US could possibly be fascist, the next I'm arguing with people who believe fascism can be stopped through voting.
No - the fascists don't matter as far as your actual vote is concerned. You can't "establish" fascism through voting. How much power the fascists get depends completely on the political establishment regardless of how the voting goes. You've had four years of Biden and the fascists haven't grown any weaker, have they?
When you vote for a liberal you are basically voting for them because they pinky-swore that they won't hand more and more power to the fascists (never mind them actually doing something about the fascists because they won't) - but they don't need your permission to do so. You have to understand that they, being political elites, will inevitably be incentivized to do so.
There's a good reason we call US "formal" politics a glorified "good cop/bad cop" routine.
If Pig City was being constructed under Trump, the resistance to it would be ten times stronger.
I think I once would have believed this but I do not anymore, and I wouldn't be willing to bet the lives of all people who aren't white, heterosexual cis-men on a resistance suddenly appearing. If anything, it seems like people are more willing to normalize, or at least look away from, atrocities than I would have ever imagined in the past.
Feels like for months all we heard about was kids in cages and how terrible it was (under Trump). Now nobody says a gd thing (under Biden). Seems like it's only acceptable to fight against fascism when it's "the other team."
and I wouldn’t be willing to bet the lives of all people who aren’t white, heterosexual cis-men on a resistance suddenly appearing
You won't get the chance to bet on it - it is simply the direction in which the US political establishment is careening. By all means, vote your conscience - hell, I'll vote with you - but don't be surprised when that doesn't alter the course much... or even at all.
If anything, it seems like people are more willing to normalize, or at least look away from, atrocities than I would have ever imagined in the past.
Certainly - but then, again... a lot of us always have. That's how we ended up here in the first place, isn't it?
If you were intelligent and you're not, you would already be voting Democratic. That you can't tell who are the bad from the good guys in this scenario just speaks to how illiterate and unintelligent you right wingers truly are.
No democrat has ever helped "strengthen" a fascist institution. It's possible you're just idiotic and haven't had any education. In fact, I'd say you just proved it beyond all question.
And frankly I'd rather have democratic fascists anyway. Whatever that looks like - I'll take it over a repuglican one anyday.
A great example of what I mean. Fund the police, not the facists. Which is a police I totally agree with. Only the dimmest of dimwits would want to see the police go unfunded.
No democrat has ever helped “strengthen” a fascist institution.
Biden literally had a pig for a running mate, genius - what did you think the police really is?
I bet you can't tell me what the first police department in the world was called or why they were created, eh?
Like all "enlightened centrists," you don't even know - and don't want to know - the history of the institutions you are so desperate to normalize. Like all "enlightened centrists," you don't want to see the brutal violence that upholds your precious status quo. It's only when it shows up on your doorstep that you start ineffectively whining about it.
It's true what the leftists say - fascism is just colonialism coming home to roost. And it's only the "coming home" part that you have a problem with.
And frankly I’d rather have democratic fascists anyway
Oh, I know what those look like - I grew up in Apartheid-era South Africa. They were pretty "democratic" - and their "democracy" would be quite compatible with your batshit liberal conception of it.
The US is about as "democratic" as the USSR was "socialist" - ie, they never were and never will be. You couldn't handle actual democracy, Clyde - your understanding of politics is too constrained to even recognize it when it happens and instead you feel threatened by it.
So go... vote "harder." But when (not if) the faux "democrats" you put your faith in delivers you onto the fascists do remember - somebody tried to explain to you why.
Fucking thank you! I read so much bullshit about this group or that one saying they're not gonna support Biden because of whatever, it makes me want to scream
It really depends on what fields you're comparing. For example, in terms of climate change, both parties, policies will result in the destruction of the planet. Period.
When people say that, they're saying we need radical change to stop the problems right in front of us, and neither party is doing that.
Ok so you DEFINITELY don't know what you're talking about then. Climate change is one of the issues that they're furthest apart on. One has repeatedly made efforts to work with the international community to expand green energy and reduce emissions, and the other believes it's a lie and wants to double down on fossil fuel production and consumption. Just because it's not the immediate, drastic, quasi-legal action that you'd like to see, doesn't mean it isn't happening.
Except it does matter. If you can keep opposition at bay, slow change can very quickly turn into drastic change if you allow it to compound. The problem has always been people turning back any change made. So long as people still exist to enact change, we're not out of time. Climate change is like riding an elevator down to hell, you can get off whenever you like, but the longer you wait the further you have to climb back up, there is no rock bottom but extinction. Defeatists like yourself are functionally no different than the deniers because you are discouraging action.
Or maybe people plugging their ears and pretending everything is some giant misinformation campaign against their home team because they think they deserve the win without trying are being shocked to find they don't have the support they think is owed to them for simply not being fascists.
If everything you hear is just some fake person with no real problems you miss the people actually complaining about their legitimate ones and feel forgotten about and at best don't vote and at worst vote for the side that agrees that it would be fun to pick on the people perceived as above them.
Biden should at least run debates or else people are just going to be in exactly their own bubble of awareness and have his results of his presidency to work with and hopes and dreams of the other and people suck at objective looks at reality and are much more willing to believe in fairy tales than you think.
And I know my statement makes everyone foam at theouth cause "How dare I say this!" But it is what it is. You must look reality in the face of you want to have any hope controlling it.
Without arguments like these in 2016, women in the south would still be able to have abortions. If you want change, find local elections with candidates you agree with. Their campaigns typically pay well, in my experience, or you can volunteer if the pay doesn’t matter to you. It’s more fruitful than throwing your hands in the air and shouting about disenfranchisement.
Without arguments like these in 2016, women in the south would still be able to have abortions
Yeah the blame for them never codifying Roe into law, their carcass in the supreme court refusing to retire, them running a terrible candidate against the will of their own voters and that candidate running an awful campaign is the fault of... people arguing on the internet
I do too, which was why I fiercely advocated for literally any other candidate in 2016. I held my nose and voted for her, but I absolutely called it. Too many people just ignored the base, and it bit all of us in the butt.
She did win the popular vote, for whatever good that does us. But what prevented a Clinton presidency was Russia seeding propaganda about her on the internet topped off with the FBI being used as a political tool. The 2016 Green Party candidate flying off to Russia last year is still a funny little sign of how absolutely fucked we are when it comes to asymmetrical information warfare.
Without arguments like these in 2016, women in the south would still be able to have abortions.
What the heck? What's the logic on that? People pointing out bad candidates is why they lost? Like seriously how on earth do you blame the weather man for the rain?
Seriously though I point out that blindly refusing to interact with conversation that makes people uncomfortable means not being prepared and the response was that this caused large standing issues with the governmental bodies that have been plaguing this country for longer than a single election?
2016 wasn't the sole deciding factor and everyone is being very emotional and really fucking stupid in here. The push to volunteer is a really good one but doesn't just make up for the idea that people talking are the issue. The share of ideas and push for betterment is necessary and sticking fingers I your ears and blindly blaming anyone that tries to point it out makes you just as fucking blind and ignorant as the people you call lesser.
It's really fucking pathetic. It's like being mad at a doctor who tells you to stop eating sugar cause you are diabetic.
Real simple. I could shut up and you would see no change. Just not hear the conversation about it directly. If you think I or any of the tiny percentage of the real world impact the Internet has is gonna be the changing factor you are incorrectly assuming and overconfidently ascribing power to what happens here. In this fraction of a fraction of a percentage.
Good luck with that prank though. Sounds like a banger of an own.
Right, people who are “Biden is genocide!!” while republicans would be worse about Palestine and trump is calling for genocide against Central Americans.
If Biden wants those groups to stop being detractors, there is a very easy solution - simply hold a primary for DNC president, and let them cast their “other” vote there. Then Dems can galvanize support for the winning candidate in ‘24.
Unfortunately they know this won’t work due to how massively unpopular Biden is, and so they refuse. So, the problem is that DNC doesn’t want a democratically elected president, they want to try to force a genocidal dinosaur down our throats and somehow at the same time claim that the end of democracy is voting for the other guy. It’s a lose-lose for America - thanks, Biden.
Precisely. The claims of at least trying to protect civilian lives might be believable if the US wasn’t blocking every single effort at the UN to send in peacekeepers to stop the genocide. Or, you know, not approving $14Bn more taxpayer dollars to go towards sending them even more bombs to drop.
Biden’s lies to provide cover for Israel’s war crimes are boldfaced, undeniable, and disgustingly cowardly.
Biden has to earn my vote, just like every other candidate. If you want me to vote for Biden, convince me. What do you like about his platform? Can you convince me to vote for Biden without bringing up Trump?
That doesn't make any sense. You're basically saying that you refuse to look at a suite of potential consequences of your vote. That's not responsible at all.
Can you convince me to vote for Biden without bringing up Trump?
What would be the point in that when Trump is the only other candidate who has a chance of winning? The rational thing to do is to compare and contrast them.
If you're not going to vote for either of them, you might as well not vote at all. You're not going to have an effect. Decades of people voting third party have not gotten any third party anywhere. Not even when Ross Perot tried it and he actually had a decent chance.
Woah woah. Biden is definitely the getting punched in the face candidate less we remember that Trump will happily send innocent people to jail for calling him names.
He tear gassed a protest to get a photo of him as supreme leader with his upside down borrowed ǝlqı𐐒.
He will happily roll back any regulations and protections and enrich anyone and any country that makes his erection harder.
Trump is absolutely the getting shot option and it's in the leg and you think it may have nicked an artery.
The rail union thing...that was a hard one, but ultimately, 3/4 of the unions involved had already approved the deal the government forced. A strike could have cost 750k jobs across the entire economy, and we'd be in full-on recession mode right now.
On immigration... We stopped forcibly removing kids from their families and have been working to reunite the families Trump separated. They're currently working on reestablishing judicial discretion (which the Trump admin removed) and fired a bunch of the Trump-appointed immigration judges. The system still really sucks, but that's a legislative issue, not an executive one. At this point, the alternative is talking about immigrants poisoning the blood of our country.
Joe ain't left-wing, that's for sure, but he's the best candidate in the batch at this point (that can win the presidency while we're locked into a 2 party system).
3/4 of the unions involved had already approved the deal the government forced
Nowhere near 3/4 of the union MEMBERS, though. The ones that had already caved were a lot of smaller unions with much less bargaining power than the bigger ones who were able to hold on until Biden pulled the rug from under them.
A strike could have cost 750k jobs across the entire economy
Not without corporations doing the actual firing. Like Biden, you're acting like mass layoffs are just a natural consequence of workers demanding fair pay and decent conditions.
It isn't. It's the result of giant corporations CHOOSING to destroy lives to save their equivalent of pocket change that they could easily spare.
Joe ain't left-wing, that's for sure
True.
he's the best by far least awful candidate in the batch at this point (that can win the presidency while we're locked into a 2 party system).
Biden made the best of a bad situation with the railway union issue. He worked pretty hard and without any need for adulation behind the scenes to continue resolving the strikers needs.
Allowing the railways to collapse would have been financially devastating.
Kinda. By Lauren McFerran of the NLRB and other unsung pro-labor heroes cleaning up the mess Biden made to get much worse deals than they would have been able to if the president hadn't strongarmed Congress into taking their rights away.
The only positive things Biden has done for unions and workers in general is appoint people who are more pro-labor than he is to relevant positions. Usually on the advice of yet other people who are also much more pro-labor than The Senator from MBNA.
And no, that doesn't mean that I'd advise anyone to not vote for him next year.
Being punched in the face is still almost infinitely better than being shot in the genitals and left to die in agony from the resulting blood loss.
Just once, though, it would be LOVELY to have a helping hand to vote for rather than a fist or a bullet.
I don't want Trump to get another term. And Biden putting on his big boy pants and doing popular things is our best chance to preventing a second Trump term. It's retail politics, not rocket science.
There are tons of popular things he's not doing. For one, he could just straight up order the decriminalization of marijuana at the federal level. And by that, I mean, banning enforcement of the law.
Biden literally instructed the DEA to reschedule cannabis already. This kind of rulemaking requires actual policy studies, as the courts have repeatedly stated that it can't be done capriciously.
It's crazy how people know every fucking awful thing the government does but never the stuff they ostensibly support. I'll say it again - the biggest problem with progressive US politics is the cynicism and engagement gap
I specifically said he could decriminalize it at the federal level today. He ordered for it to be looked at potentially, but it has not happened, and there is nothing that stops him from ordering it definitively right now.
The user I responded to specifically said that he already ordered the decriminalization of it.
I get that the FDA could reclassify marijuana, but the real issue i think is that Congress needs to get on the ball and deal with legalizing it . There are laws on the books that have to be dealt with regarding sale and distribution and banking issues.
Couldnt that be done after decriminalization. Decrim will stop ruining lives and filling jails in an immediate way. People first, then economics would go a long way.
A lot of decriminalization has started with justice department changes. But honestly don't we want something that will stick and not be taken away as soon as a different party is in charge?
It's neat watching "Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good" and "Politics is the art of the possible" become "I don't want to do it, so nothing is good enough."
The president is in charge of the executive branch, he can decide to decriminalize it overnight and fire any prosecutor that challenges him. Who is going to stop him, conservative judges ruling by decree in Texas? Hahaha.
I mean yeah. That's how it has been working for the last few years. Some conservative lower judge decides to kill an executive order and it works its way to the SCOTUS and they kill it.
Agencies within the executive branch have quite a bit of independence, which is a very good thing, because if they didn't, Trump would have done vastly more damage than he did.
A second Trump term is everything you hate about Biden plus more shit. Biden still the lesser of two evils, you should vote for him.
But I will say Biden is a fucking moron for doing so many unpopular things late in his term. I guess some of these geriatric Dems would rather punch down on the left than secure democracy against it's biggest threat in decades. I get the frustration.
Who is running third party for folks to rally behind? Moreover, who is running that would somehow overcome both major parties' candidates by drawing enough away from them to win or in some way effect a change in process?
Let me know when there's a third party candidate worth my time. Jill Stein has done nothing to earn my vote, and unless she addresses her anti science remarks, she'll never get it.
Everybody needs to vote for who they honestly think the best candidate is. If that's Biden, vote Biden. If that's Jill Stein or Cornel West or whoever the Libertarians are running, then vote for them.
Vote your hopes, not your fears. Or, as Jill Stein said, "Don't vote for the lesser evil. Vote for the greater good."
Vote Democrat, but remember they are chosen because they are marginally better, not because they are great.
Do everything in your power to end the rule of a stupid two-party system, for one party going full fascist allows the other to stop fighting for your rights the way it should.
If the DNC wanted to, it could pass ballot & electoral reform. It doesn’t, because FPTP/winner takes all benefits them doubly - either they lose and can fundraise off “red team bad” messaging, or they win power and get their turn at the levers of power.
If you’re politically homeless on the right, anything even slightly to the right of median is preferential to ‘conserve’ the world you’re clutching to. Slowing or preventing change is your mantra politically, because you like the status quo today/previously
If you’re politically homeless on the left, you’re bullied in liberal unity under big-tent centrism, even though it’ll never effectively serve your core interests like right wing unity would. There may be some overlap, but good luck with actual legislative movement on LGBTQ+, unionization, campaign finance reform, alternative policing, etc
Under a different system we’d actually have coalitions and better representation on issues- especially topics with entrenched left-right collusion like foreign policy.
Here's what I don't get about this. If you vote for Trump this time, you know what you're getting. He was already president, so you know what you're in for. Is there really anybody on the fence here? I mean, I understand hating both candidates and declining to vote for either one, but if you vote for Trump, then you agree with Trump.
Yeah it's a real moral conundrum. Do you vote for the fascists who want to destroy the country of America, or the other party who wants to bring people together and have some good social programs going. It's really a very tough and confusing choice.
The side the listener is on believes this to be true regardless of whichever perspective you're speaking from.
The left thinks the right are fascists without exception. The right thinks the left are fascists without exception.
How did those fringe minority opinions suddenly become mainstream as if you can paint a whole population with such a generalization.
I'm not saying both are the same, as one inherently requires the suffering of many to have their desires met. However, both sides will use this "team sport, win at all costs" mentality so long as it resonates with the population they try to reach.
The difference being Republicans have been saying that for... 60 years now?
Democrats have only started seriously saying that since Trump.
You can argue slightly for Bush and retaliation for 9/11. But nobody was thinking the state of American democracy was at stake lol.
Plenty of Democrats allowed nuance for misguided Republicans right up until they voted for Trump a second time. Or saying the quiet part out loud, or preferred convicted pedophiles over the other team.
It ripped the rose tinted glasses off. Most people who lean even slightly left know better now. What your average republican voters says means nothing if you continue voting in fascists lol.
The downvotes are because one side has attempted an insurrection, constantly attempts to subvert the outcome of elections, and is saying out loud they plan on weaponizing police against their opposition, while the other is the fucking Democrats. Saying "both sides think that" doesn't neutralize people's genuine concerns that a not insignificant amount of politicians in one fucking party are willing to completely throw out any election that doesn't suit them, which means they are already attempting to take over. Both sides may think that, but one side thinks it credibly while the other thinks it based on absolutely nothing.
My intention wasnt to say both sides think the same, it's exactly the opposite. It's that neither side thinks the way the other is painted.
While both extreme fringes are being sold as mainstream now, the majority of people are simply more complicated than that. People on the right need to recognize that their party has been taken over, and put aside the greed of short term wins to consider if they really back this ideology. You're instantly branded a RINO and tossed aside if you do, and fear arising from cultlike mob mentality is used to keep people at the fringes.
People on the right need to recognize that their party has been taken over, and put aside the greed of short term wins to consider if they really back this ideology.
Depending on how you want to count, they've had at least 6 years to consider this. Clearly their decision has been made.
It's also been 6 years of a concerted effort to sway their opinion towards the fringe through bad actors slowly and methodically moving the goalposts.
Some are in the deep end, but many are just blindly following like sheep because they're too busy simply trying to get by. They're not evil by nature, they're just stupid and have been weaponized. There needs to be work to bring them back in a manner that doesn't scare or shame them.
I understand all of that. The OP was just saying that both sides feel the same about each other. He was not saying that one side is better than the other, or that both sides are the same, they are clearly not the same.
The media demonizes everything it can about the other side while downplaying or denying everything their side has done wrong. Everyone sticks to their 'feed' or 'channel' and so only understands their weaponized story of events. There are teams of professionals spinning each of these stories to the best of their ability. There are extremely complex algorithms pulling people further and further over their side of the boat to maintain enngagement and sell ads.
If they only ever watch 'Fox News' then they'll only hear about the good stuff their party doing and fear mongering over the other party. If they happen to see a counter argument on 'CNN' or something they'll see it as fake/misleading/out of context/false. They'll go into their similar minded social media communities and discuss and rant with a group that they see as everybody, validating their concerns.
This is a media bubble, a worsening bipolar extermist movement driven my massive market forces. We have to acknowledge we are subject to the same media bubble effects as they are, the same market forces are being applied to us. Swap the positions of 'Fox News' and 'CNN' in the above paragraph and reread it.
Until people acknowledge this and learn to engage with their opposition in a productive manner, the political climate in this country will continue to worsen. The politicians and media will never engaged the opposition productively as it is against their interests to do so. This bipolar extremism works too well for improving votes, user engagement, donations, and merch sales. Yet in the end, it is us who they are competing over. De-escalation is the best path forward from this. While that effort is against the flow of the system, we are the only ones who can do it.
Democratic leadership and a literal few sane Republicans Representatives do indeed engage with their opposition at the detriment to how their base views either of them. They are a very fickle bridge currently holding our democracy together.
That doesn't mean that either base is incorrect on vehemently denying the others stances. Plenty of people see eye to eye on a multitude of issues. Only Republicans almost unanimously agrees with their opposition but still votes against their own wishes. That's what single issue voting and scare tactics gets you.
You're falsely conflating a Democrats ability to vote with confidence in their parties stances and a Republicans ability to vote against a democrats. The Republican view harshly belies their ability to find an olive branch.
Take an upvote, well said and i can't disagree with you.
My reason in speaking out is to hopefully promote positive change. I see too many people here giving in to the us vs them, 'deport them' mindset that the other side has maintained for so long. Positive change requires one side to act better than the other and engage with them positively.
I generally agree. There have always been far more bridges crossed with kindness and understanding than there have been in othering your neighbors.
However like we've said, the issues everyone disagrees on are also very real, visceral, and part of of an every growing divide that happens naturally in democratic environments.
Too many people forget that you can compromise on a lot, but once you've gone through everything, you end up with stances that cannot be budged on. They're antithetical to how your entire worldview may work. And that's fine to draw the line, but don't mistake it for something you can't whittle away at. Knowledge and understanding can get past a lot it, and sometimes, you never will. But it doesn't make it NOT the best avenue for non-violent change.
It does. Biden is able to get away with being toothless and doing things like continuing to build the border wall. It feels like his only redemption is he's not Trump. I will vote my mind during the primaries but if it's Biden, I'm gonna hate that I have to vote for him simply because the alternative is worse.
"Both parties are the same" is an obviously silly statement.
At the same time, "Vote for the man who says he can't avoid building Trump's wall, but can use executive power to sell weapons specifically to be used for genocide... Because the other guy is worse." is not a great way to raise voter turnout.
Some of the people criticizing others in this thread have been organizing against genocide. Have been calling their representatives, protesting in the street, etc.
If that's you; Great! My beef is not with you.
If not, and especially if you were telling people to vote for Biden in 2020 because we could "push him to the left"; Maybe work on getting Biden to stop funding genocide and generally push an agenda that will make people want to vote for him.
With current levels of partisanship, turnout is what makes the difference in elections.
Criticizing the very people you're trying to get to vote is at best counter-productive.
Like it or not, if you're campaigning for Biden then you're an embassador for the Democratic party. People notice what you spend your energy on, and what you don't. If you spend more time calling people on the left "stupid" than you do campaigning to end genocide? People will notice, and they will associate Biden supporters with hypocrites that don't actually care about them or people like them.
Being a dick is easier than actually organizing; But it won't achieve your stated goals.
I feel like his posts are usually just lukewarm takes on topics that many other people have already articulated (obviously with fewer f bombs). I rarely see him post anything that actually adds anything to the discourse. People have pointed out the ridiculousness of the "bOtH sIdEs" mindset plenty of times for a long time.
If this tweet had been in response to something specific it would be fine, but with no meaningful context it's just Jeff Tiedrich once again shouting "holy fucking shit [insert extremely common left wing opinion here] fuckity fuck" to his echo chamber of a follower list.
It's just sad that you can't vote for the party you agree with because then your vote loses any value. Americans probably can't imagine the amount of parties in other countries,
gee, who do I vote for, the guy who I sometimes don't agree with, or the fascist dictator-wannabe who warns about immigrants "poisioning the blood" of white people. what a fucking conundrum
When you use a service for years, multiple times per day, and all your contacts also use it, it's hard to switch even if you hate what the service has become.
With this behaviour and this thinking you'll be voting against "The Bigger Evil" for the rest of your life. Your kids will be bullied into voting for "The Lesser Evil" their whole life, your grandchildren will be reminded by their friendly AI legal expert to vote for anyone just not for "Evil Jeff".
Your whole political conscience revolves around a struggle that doesn't exist. You do no good voting for any of these manipulative racists, liars and/or genocidal clowns by listening to paid twitter jesters or hollywood stars. The eChoEs of these shouting matches are so loud now, normal spoken words don't have any weight.
If you put just a fraction of the energy, money or your thoughts into changing your fascist system instead of this useless reality show you call politics every four years (and the years in between), you might be able to die with a knowledge that your children and grandchildren could live in a (more) normal world.
Both men enable genocide. Trump is just worst. There is no winner here plus Dems constantly let themselves get punked out by GOP cultists. We have reached the end result of vote blue no matter who.
Most fucked up part is that that Turd is the reflection of republicans. ;/ Which means that half of the USA went crazy, not just one politician ;/
If electorates were decent human beings, republican party would be forced to offer a decent human being for presidency ;/ and not this anti-science Turd..
If it's a constant race to the bottom... who cares. I would rather see us bottom out so that there is a chance that I could see real change in my lifetime.
Just vote 3rd party. It takes enough people throwing their votes away to break this duopoly. Build new political parties and stop giving money to either republicans or dems. These people are only as powerful as we make them with our money.
I really think they need to run a primary against him just so that people can feel like he is at least the right decision to make even if it feels weak cause this aggressive "It's someone else's fault and I won't do anything about it unless I get exactly what I want!" Attitude is absolutely gonna make him lose the vote even if it pisses everyone off to hear.
Wow Democrats are eating each other alive at the realization that they may not win. I'm a bleeding heart leftist that would really love if we don't backslide into a fascist Cristo nationalist state but seriously this screaming anger that people aren't agreeing with the milquetoast forced pick is definitely not gonna help.
Everyone said that the Republican party would split but no. Democrats will lose again by being angry and not supporting people once again.
A party that looks willing to change to better support the requests of their people is a lot more attractive than one that just wants to push the tower back together and keep playing the same games. And when competing against someone who is able to pretend the rubble is is a castle if you just whip hard enough then you are gonna be against a wall that doesn't budge.
This look of spiteful anger isn't going to get people to back the old man and that's the hard truth that needs to be accepted.
Nobody will ever make me feel bad that Trump is going to win because I'm not going to vote for Biden. Just more blaming everyone but themselves.
One I saw how willing democrats are to sabotage candidates to push ahead "the safe pick" I just gave up. The Republicans went full steam behind their radical, won, committed hundreds of crimes, and are going to win again.
But Bernie sanders and Universal Healthcare? No fucking chance. We can deal with a little insurrection, just throw em in jail. But if everybody got Healthcare, stopped fighting each other, and were healthy enough to fight against the rich people? Can't stop that.
Well it's a year out and we are all just being reactionary to polling numbers but the more the sentiment sticks the more we shape the future. So I guess we just have to see when an election year actually starts instead of doing nothing and fighting about it.
Also can I just add: doing nothing and expecting the same outcome is insanity
The reason people are worried about the poll numbers right now is that now is the only chance we have to put up a different Democratic nominee. I'm not really sure we have a window of time to correct anything if we've already put them up as our nominee.
The window doesn't exist. No one wants to hear what makes them uncomfortable anymore. They are tired of the same but scared of anything different. And so down we will grind. Biden can win and delay this more but we will see and it won't be just because he is there like last election.
No, I'm not saying he's not in trouble or that they don't need to get hold of the message or change policies in key areas or whatever.
I'm saying that the argument that "shaming leftists for wanting to stay at home won't work" or that "spiteful anger is not going to get people to back" Biden doesn't track. We all spent a year in aggresively spiteful anger at a bunch of performative Berniebros all over social media who argued that they would never vote for Biden under the circumstances. Turns out either they showed up, they hadn't shown up before either or weren't that many. Because, again, Biden won.
This whole "why don't Democrats court us specifically" dejection is infuriating, especially because it tends to be a pre-electoral thing only. The way I see it, with the US's electoral system a leftist is at their most powerless around major elections. They get no choice. It's liberal centrists or active fascism.
The right time to apply political pressure to Biden or any other centrist democrat in power is during the term, when they need leftist votes to get past narrow majorities and there is a reasonable opportunity to trade reform for commonplace legislation and normal operation. But pressing before elections? All that gets you is the only one of the two factions you can influence in any way losing all power, and as a result you losing all power.
Vote for democrats and then apply pressure between terms or go start the revolution. But whining about Dems not caring about you just before an election is not it.
It's not just about the fucking Berniebros. It's about the silent majority of Americans who never say shit and just vote or don't. It's about the people that really matter and I'm trying to speak for them. The idiots who will eat up whatever confirms their current ideas of how everything is going that you get from being down on their level and talking to them.
Christ you pick your boogymen and stick to it and direct all your anger and energy at the people being vocal and not notice the everything else.
It's about giving those people an idea of a choice, it's why I have called for Biden to do some debates or make an effort to campaign a little and toot his own horn. Fuck I would love him to be rallied by a leftist and show that he gets more of the middle by being a slow and careful old curmudgeon but you stick to one stupidly flawed argument that it's about the people being vocal.
Whatever. The easy target is the one that puts it's head up to talk. This entire chat is full of people that are scared and simply screaming at the people that try to offer a conversation to point out ideas that they aren't thinking of. But stay with blinders on. Shut up the people that try to say anything and just be shocked and remember our names as the problem if it all goes sideways because someone has the audacity to say something you didn't want to hear.
But that's my point, the Berniebros were the ones saying that the silent majority would stay at home because they were being berated about Trump being an existential threat. Turns out, the silent majority did need the raised alarms and the sense that they needed to get off their ass, so the allegedly arrogant tand not constructive raised alarms were both effective and necessary.
Instead, a sector of the left assumes that the silent majority agrees with them specifically and doesn't get the ripples of people raising their voice to say that inaction based on mild dissatisfaction with liberals is a major, major mistake that may take the US past the point of no return. The left keeps making claims that actually no, it's about making people exicted and hopeful and stuff, which sounds great... except look at the other guy. It's not exciting and hopeful here, it's welcome to the rise of fascism, either you keep stomping them down every single time or it's the last time you get the chance. That's forever now, until the GOP solves their actual fascist problem. Somehow, this seems to be the centrist democrats' fault every time an election comes around, but not while the online left is in between bouts of blaming them for the rise of fascism.
So I say again, I am begging people on the left to rise up in between elections and deploy absolutely ruthless pressure to get structural reform that will lock fascists out of institutions. Once campaigning for major elections starts, though, you rally behind the leader, whoever it may be, and keep facists out with whatever tools are available.
And if you don't do that, then it's your fault as much as everybody else that is creating the scenario where fascists rule the country. Again. It's insane that we haven't learned this lesson yet.
I'm certainly not voting for Joe "I'm a Zionist" Biden.
Though to be fair, I'm in Florida so my vote means fuck all anyway. Maybe if I lived in a state he had an ass chance of winning I'd consider that "least harm" BS.
No, you shouldn't vote Democrat - both parties tend to have unimaginably negative foreign policy that perpetuates the American empire across the globe. This is the greatest source of evil in the world - not regressive immigration policy.
This is even why you should consider voting for Trump, regardless of what you think about him: he actually seems to endorse isolationism to some degree. I think they are probably the same concerning Israel, but it is not illogical to say that Trump would've done something else concerning the Ukraine, or that he would have be engaging with China very differently.
Anyone taking votes from Trump's top opponent is doing this country a disservice. We have a first past the post voting system. Voting 3rd party is a vote against your interests.
Imagine having the gall to run for office and take votes from the establishment because voters actually agree with your platform.
If you're not voting for the blue team you need to get our head out of your ass and show a little gratitude. You don't know what's in your best interest, so don't even think about any other party.
In fact, we should just ban all 3rd parties. That way nobody can be misled into thinking anyone other than Democrats are looking out for their best interest.
that's an undemocratic appeal to the "tactical vote". i respect anyone's choice on how they use theirs, but after having been manipulated years ago on that premise, i have refused to do it again
I'll respect the idea that they have a choice, I will judge them if their choice is stupidly anti-pragmatic, though.
The presidential race is fucked. We're not making it fair any time soon, especially not with a vote for a candidate who doesn't have a chance in hell of winning. The best we can do is ensure that the candidate who'll do the least damage wins. Anything else spells disaster.
In the mean time, vote for better candidates in state and local elections, where an outsider has a chance at winning. And if they do, they have a better chance at changing the system so it doesn't suck.
Man that still absolutely hurt but glad it's out there to show for why we have to be worried of well funded alternatives with not much tracing on how they rose or got the funds.
The Green party didn't even file all their paperwork for the last election and instead threw a tantrum about it. Pathetic that they are considered the closest to an 3rd party we might have.
i was. thanks for the reply, but what does that prove? i can get you dozens of photos of Biden or some other democratic personality in the same room with Putin
this whole thing about anyone who's not 100% for the DNC's choice of candidate must be a Putin puppet is paranoid
powerful people i don't like nor trust will benefit from Biden's election, and the same can be said about Trump. those are not the reasons to choose one over the other. the same applies to any other election
this whole attitude seems very obscurantist and very undemocratic to me
That’s not an option in US politics, unfortunately. But one candidate would probably say “nuke Palestine!” and want to send troops, or maybe not depending on what Putin tells him to do.
i naively believed the other lemming's statement but Cornel West's running. if Jill Stein wins her party's primary, that'll be two candidates with a history of condemning Israel's war on palestinians, both having described that state's actions as genocidal
And a vote for either is a vote for Trump. But if you want to bury your head in the sand and condemn the country to oblivion on principle, well hey, it's a free country for the next 12 months.
nope, a vote for some candidate is a vote for that candidate. i'm not burying my head in the sand because i'm not an american voter. i'm a foreigner that's been a victim of lying imperialist presidents from the bullshit land of the free fairyland for a long freaking time
you claim the US to be a free country for at least the next 12 months, and i think you have your head in the sand. just because i think Trump is way worse than Biden doesn't mean i don't know for a fact that he's really bad
i came here because @[email protected] falsely claimed that no one else is on the table
second, it seems to me that you're claiming i'm trying to influence US elections because i don't agree with you. i started typing in here because i was mislead by a lie, asked for clarification, and then added information for other readers to clarify that lie
you're comparing my posts to the actions of Cambridge Analytica (lol!!) that's really sensasionalist and manipulative
Okay so technically others are on the table, but realistically you only have two options. My country uses a representative parliament, your party needs to hold a certain amount of votes to enter parliament because each (literal) seat in parliament corresponds to a certain amount of votes. You obviously can't divide a person in two, so you need to clear the bar.
The U.S. has a singular winner. Unless for some reason a very large portion of voters decide to vote for a third party (and the same third party at that), you're unlikely to ever see a third party candidate actually win.
Yep. In fact I would even say the bird has already died on the ground and is incapable of being resurrected. As someone above said, it's time to hitch our balls to a new bird and start over.
A giant douche or a turd sandwich, who will you choose?
edit: it's a south park reference people, chill. It's just recognizing that both candidates are shitty. Obviously in this case one is far worse than the other, and it doesn't mean you shouldn't vote... fucking vote
But that's my point, it's not relevant. It's a bOtH SiDeS sAmE enlightened centrist platitude that's just meant to ride the fence to avoid pissing anyone off. "Haha, both the candidates suck, I don't want to vote for either." That's neither insightful nor entertaining. There are real differences between the candidates, the parties, and the various sides of an issue, and pretending it doesn't matter is part of why the world is a fucking mess.
Honestly, for me it's just a reflection of the fact that there are always going to be 2 shitty candidates. It's not some centrist manifesto, obviously Biden is still the clear choice compared to a fucking fascist psychopath.
As someone who is neither centrist nor enamored of either party, it isn't ever "both sides are the same." It's "these two groups actively work together to prevent others from sharing the platform' and 'of all of the possible candidates, these are their best?'
Biden is better than Trump, point blank. Regardless, if Biden is polling poorly, then the Democrats should set aside their pride and pick a candidate that appeals to independents and proper progressives. The Democratic base will vote for whoever the DNC fields, so the real challenge is convincing those swing voters.
Attempting to shame people into voting for a problematic candidate is what got us Trump in the first place. Perhaps its time to listen to those seeking actual change.
Biden is better than Trump, point blank. Regardless, if Biden is polling poorly, then the Democrats should set aside their pride and pick a candidate that appeals to independents and proper progressives.
Or at the very least, fix their fucking messaging.
I'm suggesting that people who quote that line do so in order to imply that there isn't a difference. The whole episode is about how Stan doesn't care for either candidate, and resents being forced to choose.
You say that like it matters what a Democrat's position is. It doesn't. Not even when they have a supermajority in Congress and control the Supreme Court. They will not get things done.
Vote abstinence in situations where you dont like any candidate is a valid option and part of your civic duty in a democracy. Not voting for Biden isn't a vote for Trump, no matter how many times you people try to gaslight yourselves into believing otherwise.
And the Democrats vote for the Democratic candidate no matter what. That they have a better candidate is obvious, but pretending that the core would deviate from voting as they're told is not supported by their past behavior.
It's also essentially you declaring that you don't really mind if Trump gets in. If you were opposed to Trump, you'd actively try to stop him gaining power again. If you're not voting in a way where you try to prevent him gaining power, sure, you're not actively supporting him, but you're still willing to sit by while fascism rears its head. That is what people are judging you for.
To pick an extreme analogy: if there's a child drowning and you're in a position where you could easily save them but choose not to because you saw that child being mean to someone once, no-one's going to call you a child murderer but people are going to judge the hell out of you for being "the guy who doesn't save drowning children".
So yes, vote abstinence is an option. But I'd argue what's more a part of your "civic duty" is to prevent fascists rising to power when you personally have a say in preventing that.
Democrats and the DNC hold all of the power when it comes to who they field for the election. If their current chosen is polling poorly, if he's not energizing the people that the DNC needs to win, then they have the power to nominate someone who does. If they're willing to risk Trump getting in by fielding the candidate anyway, then they're indicating their willingness to put stubborn pride and the need for control over doing what they know needs to be done.
The Democrats hold all of the cards when it comes to who to run. If Trump gets in because they cling to stubborn pride, then they have only have themselves to blame.
"Maybe if the Republicans get elected on a platform of christofascist dictatorship and enact massive disenfranchisement and roll back civil rights, things will get more representative and we'll see more left leaning candidates in future elections somehow, rather than the people who have promised to ratfuck every election for eternity ratfucking every subsequent election." This is your ridiculous logic.
My logic: Democrats hold all of the cards. They are not required to run Biden and they have plenty of time to find a candidate that appeals to progressives outside of their core. If they choose to push forward with a mediocre candidate who is currently polling poorly and the worst possible person gets elected, they are responsible for the loss.
They actually don't have time. The first of the primary caucuses happen in less than a month. You're talking about putting a full slate of unvetted candidates in front of a national primary with less than a month before voters would have to choose.
The Democrats made an error. They thought the Republicans surely would nominate someone else. They didn't know Trump would quote Hitler a few days ago. They're trying to run in an election with an incumbent. That's how the parties have operated since.. maybe the beginning. I don't know that I know of a time when an eligible incumbent presidential candidate didn't run. Maybe Washington?
Democrats are making the same mistake that voters are. They're treating Trump like a beatable candidate, and expecting voters to act rationally. But yet, we see people saying the same irrational thing you are, that it's better to sit out and let Trump get elected again than it is to vote for a milquetoast candidate like Biden. That's it's better for the worst evil to be elected than to vote for the lesser evil. It's irrational. And yet, here we are, with someone thinking that the Dems can spin up a national primary for couple hundred million people in a couple of weeks.
Sadly the cynic in me thinks it's precisely the opposite. I think Democrats knew that they would run Donald Trump and just assume he's an easily beaten target. An impossibly high stakes gamble.
People aren't that smart and don't think like that. They think that they are hurting and don't like feeling forced and will look for who is "on their side and punishing up" or even just become apathetic. You are able to see the long picture and be rightfully scared of it but then it's up to us to point that out to the people who have power and ability to do something about it. And raise awareness where possible.
He, nor I, have any logical statement on how it will get better for it being worse just that reality is what is. It would be likely a lot worse should Republicans get everything they want, but the Democrats need to see they won't get votes just for whipping like the Republicans.
You are having an emotional response cause you are scared and shooting the messenger.
You know that as an american citizen, whoever gets voted in is someone you would have to deal with, right?
Domestically, that would be saying you are no further than "wag finger on a soapbox" towards allowing the voting in of someone who has attempted treason and has said he would go dictator if voted in, while doing speeches that can literally be pulled from Adolf Hitler.
If you are an american citizen, speak like this is your FUCKING PROBLEM
Because not voting for Biden is absolutely not the same as voting for Trump. That I agree with. Not voting at all though is voting for either. Only by showing up and literally voting for neither is the only way to vote for neither of them.
Trump is literally saying that immigrants are polluting the blood of the country. He's calling his political opponents vermin and saying he wants to be dictator (don't worry, just one day!) How much clearer could the stakes be?
I sure hope not. In my opinion, the right is splintering off into a fascism regime and more people who once were undecided are voting democratic (per USA Today) than in any prior year.
There's nuance. Obviously, vote for the liberal over the fascist, it's not even close. However, the fascists are absolutely represented in government, while there's no leftist candidates to speak of. Leftists have to plug their nose and vote liberal, while fascists gleefully vote republican.
Voting is entirely for loss prevention, because ultimately it absolutely impacts minority groups and people who stand to lose a great deal by a republican victory. However, leftists will not be able to move America to the left by voting.
That's why grassroots movements and building up of parallel structures are so important for leftism, it cannot work within the confines of a 2 party Capitalist state, and must be built from the bottom up.
You said there’s nuance but then went on to explain that there isn’t nuance and the only reasonable vote is for Biden. And you’re not wrong. There are a lot of folks pretending to be on the left acting like there’s a whole lot of nuance here, and that voting for someone other than Biden, or not voting at all, is an acceptable option.
None of this precludes advocating for your positions or doing other praxis, but when it comes to voting the answer is clear
There's nuance, because leftists saying voting isn't going to change anything meaningfully as far as moving towards the left is still true.
That is true, but not voting or casting a protest vote right now ensures fascism, under which there will be literally no choice at all.
At least under a democracy there are chances to improve things, like replacing FPTP with a better voting system that will actually allow the left a seat at the table. That’s already happening in some places and there’s a movement (supported by democrats and vehemently opposed by republicans) to enact alternative voting methods.
Unfortunately there’s been so much apathy for decades that the fascists have got their foot solidly in the door. There was nuance years ago, but we squandered it. There’s little point debating left vs liberal when fascism has taken hold. That must be stopped first.
There’s no such thing as moral neutrality in this environment, and as much as it sucks, not voting against fascism is the same as voting for fascism.
Hence my original point, leftists must vote for liberals, even if it isn't ever going to improve the system, and must work themselves to build up leftist structures without hoping for help from liberals. If they don't vote, then fascists take power, and leftists lose the chance to build leftist structures at all.
I do think you're too hopeful that a 2 party Capitalist state designed to change as little as possible would meaningfully improve from within, rather than under pressure from without, but it would be great if you were right about that.
I’m not that hopeful that the left can change the system from within, to be honest, I’m just certain it’s too late to think about that because under fascist rule, not only will things not improve, but many of us will face genocide.
The time for leftist change was 20 years ago, or with any luck, 8 or so years from now after the fascist threat has been quashed. Right now we have to think about unifying like it’s 1932.
Only thing I disagree with is the idea that leftist change was more possible 20 years ago, Capitalism's instability and inherent structural flaws only make themselves more apparent and severe as time goes on, and with that comes potential for change. The left is larger than ever before, and is constantly growing.
Where? And who in the DNC supports this?
Here.
And here’s one resource to support it. There are many others, both local and national.
eta: I’m on mobile so searching and linking is hard, but you can find people running for office who support these efforts by googling the office (senator, mayor, or whatever) and ‘free vote initiative’ or some synonyms. There are some (mostly local) republicans, substantially more democrats, and a huge majority of 3rd party candidates for obvious reasons).
I strongly recommend bringing it up with your representatives. 3rd party and democrats have been teaming up for this, and republicans have been fighting it because FPTP greatly benefits them and they know it.
That apathy has been earned.
So is the illusion of being able to shift the Overton window in any way more important than saving your supporters from genocide?
Reread the original comment. It's absolutely important to vote as loss prevention, but you're never going to get meaningful systemic change towards the left via voting.
Vote to protect, actually make grassroots movements like unionizing and organizing to move to the left.
Answer my question. Which is more important, shifting the Overton window or preventing genocide? You only get to pick one
Reread the original comment. It's absolutely important to vote as loss prevention, but you're never going to get meaningful systemic change towards the left via voting.
Vote to protect, actually make grassroots movements like unionizing and organizing to move to the left.
Answer my question. Which is more important, shifting the Overton window or preventing genocide? You only get to pick one.
Yes, nothing meaningful has changed in the US in 100 years.
I suppose it might look that way if you aren't a minority or a woman or gay. If nothing meaningful has changed in the last 100 years, then we could go back to the policies of the 1900s-1920s without any difference. And I very much doubt anyone wants to do that, because there are very big differences.
The things that did change did not start with voting. Especially because women couldn't vote to get the right to vote.
TIL that amending the US constitution doesn't require voting.
Re-read this:
So they started with the liberal framework of free expression and ended with voting? Good point I guess.
I just don't know why the Onus is never on Joe Biden himself. Why is it that we feel like he doesn't have to earn any votes at all?
"Am I so out of touch? No, it's the voters who are wrong."
No, it's more like "LOL you have to vote for me, or the fascist will win". Democrats love opponents like Trump, because he helps them fundraise like crazy.
It also means they don't have to do shit but be second worst to a literal fascist. And it's disgusting how comfortable they are in such a position.
The onus isn't on him because voting for him is for our benefit, not his.
It's to our lesser detriment. There's a difference.
Voting for someone other than Biden or not voting is an absolutely acceptable option, and I’m not pretending to be a leftist when I do so. I have Ranked Choice Voting in my state, but even if I didn’t, I would vote for who I most want in office because I have no faith in either democrats or republicans to fix the most important issues currently plaguing 99% of the people. Vilifying people for voting third party — when third parties are currently the only viable presidential and congressional solution apart from a violent revolution — is misguided.
Democrats are not your friends; you deserve better.
Non voters vote too. They vote for 'I'll have what she's having.' then they complain when she chooses shit.
We're not voting for friends.
Leftist 3rd parties split votes between leftists and the more conservative liberals (who are the vast majority), increasing the chance of a Republican victory. I fully support right-wing people voting Libertarian though :)
With the politics of the U.S. population, and violent revolution would likely be fascist.
Just a random note: Most proper libertarians (not those weird tea party fucks) make Democrats look positively authoritarian on social issues. Economics, no, but social? Absolutely.
True. I considered myself a libertarian when I was in high school (mostly for cannabis legalization and guns, lol). Then, some of my first job experiences were pretty bad (persistent wage theft on multiple jobs, an owner coercing sex from minors, etc), and started becoming more of a leftist.
I get that. Libertarians have a bad habit of downplaying economic hardship by saying that markets will solve themselves. Maybe there's a world in which that might work, but it isn't this one.
I do think that some progressive influencers know that the DNC is much closer to the GOP on social issues. Attacking libertarians is, in my opinion, a calculated lie designed to distract from that fact.
Tell me you don't understand math & game theory without telling me you don't understand math & game theory.
This is very well written and well said. If we want change that doesn't come from working within the Democrats, we have to build our own robust party across all 50 states, drawing on strong local support. No one outside of the two parties is currently trying to do this, which speaks volumes about the Green and Libertarian Parties.
Leftists really have no choice other than to vote Democrat. We have to protect people who would be targeted by Republicans. We fundamentally go against left wing values if we don't. I cannot call myself liberal or leftist or wherever in-between if I sit out an election where innocent people will suffer if one of the candidates wins.
I like how you've phrased this -- voting for Biden isn't because you necessarily like his policies or viewpoints, but because you want to protect people from Trump and the Republicans. I'd love if we didn't have to worry about fascists, but we don't have that luxury. As long as they're a hair's breadth away from power, we pick the option that opposes them.
Exactly. There's one terminally online radlib here that I blocked because they were just shit-slinging for daring to suggest both voting Biden and unionizing, organizing, protesting, etc. As a leftist, we must work from without the Democratic party.
Speaking purely from a leftist perspective, I'm actually of the opinion that Anarchist principles of building up parallel structures actually may be more applicable to the American political climate, even if you're more of a Council Communist, Libertarian Socialist, Marxist-Leninist, etc. The US is seeing rising Unionization, and dramatic impacts from it, so I think Syndicalism actually has some revolutionary potential, unlike waiting for a Vanguard Party a la MLism.
Just my 2 cents.
It's funny, I thought that unions had passed their usefulness, and we needed a new structure to effectively push CEOs. And then the UAW and SAG proved me completely wrong, and I'm glad for it.
I think either way, you have the perfect viewpoint on this. Voting won't work to create change, but that doesn't mean you just ignore voting. You use it to protect what we have from fascists while initiating change from a new organization built from the ground up.
I'm extremely anticapitalist, and Unions are currently the best way for Workers to protect their own interests within current structures, and have the potential to replace current Capitalist ownership. A full replacement of Capitalist structures will be necessary eventually, but Unionization can be an arm to muscle that change through.
Thanks for sharing!
How's that going? Republicans are enacting all manner of bigoted policy. What are the Democrats doing to reverse their hateful shit at the federal level?
We don't have that option. We have Democrats, who will always care more about decorum and procedural bullshit than they ever will about protecting anyone.
They don't have the numbers in Congress necessary to take federal action. It's a vicious circle -- people don't think they're doing enough, so they don't vote for them. As a result, they don't have the numbers necessary to actually affect change. And then people don't think they're doing enough, and so forth. The justice department is suing states at least, but I agree that's nowhere near enough.
If you have a way to get 60 Senate votes to protect minorities (or 50-51 who also are willing to overturn the filibuster) and the House majority, I'm all for it, and you have my support. In the absence of that, any action we take will be inadequate, no matter who is in office.
And Democrats may not be perfect, but a vote that doesn't go to fascists is a win in my book. I also think we should try to maintain norms and decorum for as long as possible -- if we can beat back fascism without compromising on our institutions, we emerge as a much stronger democracy than if we have to break the rules. If that's what it takes to stop fascists though, then so be it. I just worry that you end up in a French Revolution type situation where there's no stable governance because everyone's given up on the rules.
We're not going to get rid of the two party system without switching to a proportional representation system. I have my preference for America (5 seat districts with proportional approval voting) but any reasonable proportional system will do.
Great comment. 100%
Be the millionaire Democrat socialist/ liberal representative you want to be!
There's no chance they'd ever let an actual Socialist into office within the 2 party Capitalist system.
True, which is why you run as a Democrat then just be a socialist lol.
Can't do much without a mass party to back you up. It takes a lot of people.
That's why you pull a reverse Sinema. Lie your ass off and pretend to be the most corporate corpodem that ever sold out. You'll only have to fight one major party instead of both of them to get elected, then you can move as far to the left as you want, so long as you avoid small aircraft.
Even there, though, even as a president, you can't meaningfully move much without the support of the party. The difference for fascists is that the Republican party legitimately has a ton of actual fascists, so fascist presidents are extremely dangerous. If a Socialist led the DNC, it would be spoiled and wouldn't have much of a chance to move left.
I wasn't talking about the presidency per se.
Yes, that do be how voting works...
He's not talking about voting. He's talking about getting elected.
https://streetcivics.com/9-textbook-examples-of-grassroots-activism/
If I was a fascist, I'd vote Dem - fascism just gets more traction with liberals in the Waffle House, and Dems are utterly ineffective at actually doing anything to stop fascism anyway. It was Trump whipping the fascists into a froth while a lib was in the Waffle House that brought antifa into the streets - not Trump actually humiliating himself on a daily basis in the Offal Office.
Fascists just gets more from a Dem regime - the Dems are doing a fine job strengthening fascist institutions. If Pig City was being constructed under Trump, the resistance to it would be ten times stronger.
None of this means you are wrong, of course (you're not) - but if voting can stop fascists it simply means the political institutions aren't ready to hand power over to them just yet. They are working on it, though.
Accelerationism works both ways, I suppose, but there legitimately are fascists in the republican party.
Doesn't matter. The actual fascists doesn't matter. The thing to be concerned about isn't the fascists themselves - what matters is the liberals that will hand power to the fascists if their precious status quo is threatened enough.
The thing about fascists that nobody except leftists seem to understand is that fascists serve a very distinct purpose in the classical liberal nation-state - they don't exist in a vacuum as some kind of "aberration". Fascism cannot exist without threatened capitalists funding them. Fascism cannot exist without liberals handing power to them to maintain their precious "Law & Order."
There is no such thing as "grass-roots fascism" - it's all coming from above.
It makes sense, but I think the downvotes are from people feeling like this is victim blaming as opposed to recognizing what you're actually saying.
It's not Johnny Democrat going to the polls that's allowing fascists to take power, it's Joe Manchin protecting his own wealth by "allowing" a "friendly fascist" to take power, or pass a bill, if it means stopping a Bernie Sanders from taking office or stopping a popular bill that would cost him potential profit. Unless I'm the one who's misunderstanding lol
The downvotes are from reasonable people who understand that this kind of cynicism is privileged teenager nonsense.
No, you're not. If voting could undo fascism it wouldn't exist. If the wants of the majority of people in the US actually counted the US would be a place we couldn't even imagine in this reality - and so would the rest of the world.
I got the exact same response in 2016 as well... even leftists who should have known better hysterically accused me of "accelerationsim" for stating that a Trump presidency would energize the left - which it did (mysteriously, without any "accelerationism" on my part at all).
I don't blame them... people are grasping at straws. It was the same in 2016.
How fucking privileged can you be? This isn't a fucking game. Grow the fuck up.
Are you talking about a certain neocolonialist prodigy of notorious mass-murderer Henry Kissinger, perhaps?
Do tell, liberal - how many lives in the 3rd world would you sacrifice for your venal and hollow "girlboss" fake-feminism?
Yes it does matter; millions of people will die if Trump wins a second term. Don't lie to our face by claiming it doesn't matter.
Probably. And if the US political establishment actually manages to dig out a competent fascist, many, many more than that will die or have their lives destroyed (which has never been an unusual thing in the US at all - or anywhere the US does "foreign policy").
Your problem isn't Trump. There's a lot more (and much viler) where he came from. Your problem is the political establishment that allows his existence - will they be allowing you to vote on that any time soon?
The problem is a contingent of poorly educated small brained white trash who very incorrectly believe trump can help them out of their sorry economic conditions (in fact he actually helped make them poorer). The problem is lack of education and lack of humanity that is very evident in the responses posted on this forum.l
Oh... so you are placing the blame for the failure of your faux-democratic capitalism on white people who have the least economic power of all white people in the US?
I wonder... if we were to look at the socio-economic background of the average alt-right supporter - what would we find, liberal?
Your cognitive dissonance is palpable.
Trump has plainly stated he will destroy anyone who doesn't cast a vote for him this time around. If that isn't frightening, you need to check your pulse.
So maybe Democrats should try to get votes instead of just acting entitled to them.
Well according to recent articles in USA Today and the local Tribune, we do have the votes now. The current polling shows Biden way ahead among the popular votes. We are entitled to everyone of them, thanks for agreeing with me on that.
"the actual fascists don't matter" .......There's no way you just typed that in good faith.
Lol! It's quite hysterical - the one minute I'm arguing with people who don't believe anything in the US could possibly be fascist, the next I'm arguing with people who believe fascism can be stopped through voting.
No - the fascists don't matter as far as your actual vote is concerned. You can't "establish" fascism through voting. How much power the fascists get depends completely on the political establishment regardless of how the voting goes. You've had four years of Biden and the fascists haven't grown any weaker, have they?
When you vote for a liberal you are basically voting for them because they pinky-swore that they won't hand more and more power to the fascists (never mind them actually doing something about the fascists because they won't) - but they don't need your permission to do so. You have to understand that they, being political elites, will inevitably be incentivized to do so.
There's a good reason we call US "formal" politics a glorified "good cop/bad cop" routine.
I think I once would have believed this but I do not anymore, and I wouldn't be willing to bet the lives of all people who aren't white, heterosexual cis-men on a resistance suddenly appearing. If anything, it seems like people are more willing to normalize, or at least look away from, atrocities than I would have ever imagined in the past.
Feels like for months all we heard about was kids in cages and how terrible it was (under Trump). Now nobody says a gd thing (under Biden). Seems like it's only acceptable to fight against fascism when it's "the other team."
You won't get the chance to bet on it - it is simply the direction in which the US political establishment is careening. By all means, vote your conscience - hell, I'll vote with you - but don't be surprised when that doesn't alter the course much... or even at all.
Certainly - but then, again... a lot of us always have. That's how we ended up here in the first place, isn't it?
If you were intelligent and you're not, you would already be voting Democratic. That you can't tell who are the bad from the good guys in this scenario just speaks to how illiterate and unintelligent you right wingers truly are.
No democrat has ever helped "strengthen" a fascist institution. It's possible you're just idiotic and haven't had any education. In fact, I'd say you just proved it beyond all question.
And frankly I'd rather have democratic fascists anyway. Whatever that looks like - I'll take it over a repuglican one anyday.
"Fund the police" - Joe Biden.
A great example of what I mean. Fund the police, not the facists. Which is a police I totally agree with. Only the dimmest of dimwits would want to see the police go unfunded.
Biden was saying it in the context of increasing pig budgets.
Biden literally had a pig for a running mate, genius - what did you think the police really is?
I bet you can't tell me what the first police department in the world was called or why they were created, eh?
Like all "enlightened centrists," you don't even know - and don't want to know - the history of the institutions you are so desperate to normalize. Like all "enlightened centrists," you don't want to see the brutal violence that upholds your precious status quo. It's only when it shows up on your doorstep that you start ineffectively whining about it.
It's true what the leftists say - fascism is just colonialism coming home to roost. And it's only the "coming home" part that you have a problem with.
Oh, I know what those look like - I grew up in Apartheid-era South Africa. They were pretty "democratic" - and their "democracy" would be quite compatible with your batshit liberal conception of it.
The US is about as "democratic" as the USSR was "socialist" - ie, they never were and never will be. You couldn't handle actual democracy, Clyde - your understanding of politics is too constrained to even recognize it when it happens and instead you feel threatened by it.
So go... vote "harder." But when (not if) the faux "democrats" you put your faith in delivers you onto the fascists do remember - somebody tried to explain to you why.
Your views are so inept and wrong I can't bring myself to read them, but I'm sure they're just as idiotic as ever. Have a nice life, loser.
Do tell, Clyde... what has your faux-democrats done to weaken the fascists?
They are weaker, right?
Fucking thank you! I read so much bullshit about this group or that one saying they're not gonna support Biden because of whatever, it makes me want to scream
It really depends on what fields you're comparing. For example, in terms of climate change, both parties, policies will result in the destruction of the planet. Period.
When people say that, they're saying we need radical change to stop the problems right in front of us, and neither party is doing that.
Ok so you DEFINITELY don't know what you're talking about then. Climate change is one of the issues that they're furthest apart on. One has repeatedly made efforts to work with the international community to expand green energy and reduce emissions, and the other believes it's a lie and wants to double down on fossil fuel production and consumption. Just because it's not the immediate, drastic, quasi-legal action that you'd like to see, doesn't mean it isn't happening.
That the thing. We are out of time. Period.
It does not matter unless it is immediate and now.
Except it does matter. If you can keep opposition at bay, slow change can very quickly turn into drastic change if you allow it to compound. The problem has always been people turning back any change made. So long as people still exist to enact change, we're not out of time. Climate change is like riding an elevator down to hell, you can get off whenever you like, but the longer you wait the further you have to climb back up, there is no rock bottom but extinction. Defeatists like yourself are functionally no different than the deniers because you are discouraging action.
No not at all. I'm encouraging that they do something. Right now!
You're the only one discouraging that
5 day account calling people bots. Sus.
Or maybe people plugging their ears and pretending everything is some giant misinformation campaign against their home team because they think they deserve the win without trying are being shocked to find they don't have the support they think is owed to them for simply not being fascists.
If everything you hear is just some fake person with no real problems you miss the people actually complaining about their legitimate ones and feel forgotten about and at best don't vote and at worst vote for the side that agrees that it would be fun to pick on the people perceived as above them.
Biden should at least run debates or else people are just going to be in exactly their own bubble of awareness and have his results of his presidency to work with and hopes and dreams of the other and people suck at objective looks at reality and are much more willing to believe in fairy tales than you think.
And I know my statement makes everyone foam at theouth cause "How dare I say this!" But it is what it is. You must look reality in the face of you want to have any hope controlling it.
Without arguments like these in 2016, women in the south would still be able to have abortions. If you want change, find local elections with candidates you agree with. Their campaigns typically pay well, in my experience, or you can volunteer if the pay doesn’t matter to you. It’s more fruitful than throwing your hands in the air and shouting about disenfranchisement.
Yeah the blame for them never codifying Roe into law, their carcass in the supreme court refusing to retire, them running a terrible candidate against the will of their own voters and that candidate running an awful campaign is the fault of... people arguing on the internet
Hillary Clinton was a poor candidate. Why is it that the neo liberals never want to give her any amount of credit for her loss?
People just want human rights, you egg salad. Try not to ruin that for everyone and I won’t call you a smelly foodstuff on the internet again.
I do too, which was why I fiercely advocated for literally any other candidate in 2016. I held my nose and voted for her, but I absolutely called it. Too many people just ignored the base, and it bit all of us in the butt.
She did win the popular vote, for whatever good that does us. But what prevented a Clinton presidency was Russia seeding propaganda about her on the internet topped off with the FBI being used as a political tool. The 2016 Green Party candidate flying off to Russia last year is still a funny little sign of how absolutely fucked we are when it comes to asymmetrical information warfare.
What the heck? What's the logic on that? People pointing out bad candidates is why they lost? Like seriously how on earth do you blame the weather man for the rain?
Seriously though I point out that blindly refusing to interact with conversation that makes people uncomfortable means not being prepared and the response was that this caused large standing issues with the governmental bodies that have been plaguing this country for longer than a single election?
2016 wasn't the sole deciding factor and everyone is being very emotional and really fucking stupid in here. The push to volunteer is a really good one but doesn't just make up for the idea that people talking are the issue. The share of ideas and push for betterment is necessary and sticking fingers I your ears and blindly blaming anyone that tries to point it out makes you just as fucking blind and ignorant as the people you call lesser.
It's really fucking pathetic. It's like being mad at a doctor who tells you to stop eating sugar cause you are diabetic.
Real simple. I could shut up and you would see no change. Just not hear the conversation about it directly. If you think I or any of the tiny percentage of the real world impact the Internet has is gonna be the changing factor you are incorrectly assuming and overconfidently ascribing power to what happens here. In this fraction of a fraction of a percentage.
Good luck with that prank though. Sounds like a banger of an own.
How long ago were you first legally allowed to purchase alcohol?
Right, people who are “Biden is genocide!!” while republicans would be worse about Palestine and trump is calling for genocide against Central Americans.
If Biden wants those groups to stop being detractors, there is a very easy solution - simply hold a primary for DNC president, and let them cast their “other” vote there. Then Dems can galvanize support for the winning candidate in ‘24.
Unfortunately they know this won’t work due to how massively unpopular Biden is, and so they refuse. So, the problem is that DNC doesn’t want a democratically elected president, they want to try to force a genocidal dinosaur down our throats and somehow at the same time claim that the end of democracy is voting for the other guy. It’s a lose-lose for America - thanks, Biden.
Yeah, Biden doesn't have to support genocide. He can do the right thing. He just chooses not to.
Precisely. The claims of at least trying to protect civilian lives might be believable if the US wasn’t blocking every single effort at the UN to send in peacekeepers to stop the genocide. Or, you know, not approving $14Bn more taxpayer dollars to go towards sending them even more bombs to drop.
Biden’s lies to provide cover for Israel’s war crimes are boldfaced, undeniable, and disgustingly cowardly.
Biden has to earn my vote, just like every other candidate. If you want me to vote for Biden, convince me. What do you like about his platform? Can you convince me to vote for Biden without bringing up Trump?
That doesn't make any sense. You're basically saying that you refuse to look at a suite of potential consequences of your vote. That's not responsible at all.
And yet you need his vote.
What would be the point in that when Trump is the only other candidate who has a chance of winning? The rational thing to do is to compare and contrast them.
If you're not going to vote for either of them, you might as well not vote at all. You're not going to have an effect. Decades of people voting third party have not gotten any third party anywhere. Not even when Ross Perot tried it and he actually had a decent chance.
I think there's something wrong with a system that every 4 years have you pick wether you'd rather get repeatedly punched in the face or shot
Where am I being shot? Maybe it's someplace kinda safe like the ass. I would take a bullet to the ass over being punched in the face.
This is not trump support, was a joke about how neither is a good experience. But whatever y'all
Just to name a few:
Continued support and funding to Israel with only the most tepid condemnation as people became more aware of their genocide against Palestinians.
busting the railway union which arguably, if their demand had been met, may not have had the disaster in Ohio. A move rivaled only by Regan
Despite being told that we had to fight for “kids in cages” nothing has actually come to fruition on that front
Woah woah. Biden is definitely the getting punched in the face candidate less we remember that Trump will happily send innocent people to jail for calling him names.
He tear gassed a protest to get a photo of him as supreme leader with his upside down borrowed ǝlqı𐐒.
He will happily roll back any regulations and protections and enrich anyone and any country that makes his erection harder.
Trump is absolutely the getting shot option and it's in the leg and you think it may have nicked an artery.
On Israel, you're spot on.
The rail union thing...that was a hard one, but ultimately, 3/4 of the unions involved had already approved the deal the government forced. A strike could have cost 750k jobs across the entire economy, and we'd be in full-on recession mode right now.
On immigration... We stopped forcibly removing kids from their families and have been working to reunite the families Trump separated. They're currently working on reestablishing judicial discretion (which the Trump admin removed) and fired a bunch of the Trump-appointed immigration judges. The system still really sucks, but that's a legislative issue, not an executive one. At this point, the alternative is talking about immigrants poisoning the blood of our country.
Joe ain't left-wing, that's for sure, but he's the best candidate in the batch at this point (that can win the presidency while we're locked into a 2 party system).
Nowhere near 3/4 of the union MEMBERS, though. The ones that had already caved were a lot of smaller unions with much less bargaining power than the bigger ones who were able to hold on until Biden pulled the rug from under them.
Not without corporations doing the actual firing. Like Biden, you're acting like mass layoffs are just a natural consequence of workers demanding fair pay and decent conditions.
It isn't. It's the result of giant corporations CHOOSING to destroy lives to save their equivalent of pocket change that they could easily spare.
True.
Fixed that for you.
Biden made the best of a bad situation with the railway union issue. He worked pretty hard and without any need for adulation behind the scenes to continue resolving the strikers needs.
Allowing the railways to collapse would have been financially devastating.
If the economy can be destroyed by a private business going under, then it needs to be nationalized.
That's a bit over simplistic, it wasn't a 'single private business', it was a sector involving transport of freight across the entire country.
But I agree re nationalising integral industries.
Or broken up.
Amen.
I think the railway Union situation was handled.
Kinda. By Lauren McFerran of the NLRB and other unsung pro-labor heroes cleaning up the mess Biden made to get much worse deals than they would have been able to if the president hadn't strongarmed Congress into taking their rights away.
The only positive things Biden has done for unions and workers in general is appoint people who are more pro-labor than he is to relevant positions. Usually on the advice of yet other people who are also much more pro-labor than The Senator from MBNA.
And no, that doesn't mean that I'd advise anyone to not vote for him next year.
Being punched in the face is still almost infinitely better than being shot in the genitals and left to die in agony from the resulting blood loss.
Just once, though, it would be LOVELY to have a helping hand to vote for rather than a fist or a bullet.
I’m here for the dark humor. We fucked.
America got 300mil people and the best 2 candidates to lead the country is Trump and Biden??
I don't want Trump to get another term. And Biden putting on his big boy pants and doing popular things is our best chance to preventing a second Trump term. It's retail politics, not rocket science.
There are tons of popular things he's not doing. For one, he could just straight up order the decriminalization of marijuana at the federal level. And by that, I mean, banning enforcement of the law.
Biden literally instructed the DEA to reschedule cannabis already. This kind of rulemaking requires actual policy studies, as the courts have repeatedly stated that it can't be done capriciously.
It's crazy how people know every fucking awful thing the government does but never the stuff they ostensibly support. I'll say it again - the biggest problem with progressive US politics is the cynicism and engagement gap
He directed them to look into it. That's not the same thing as telling them to reschedule it.
"Along with the pardons, Biden directed the HHS secretary and the attorney general to review how marijuana is scheduled"
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4192705-marijuana-rescheduling-falls-short-of-expectations-on-biden/
You're just straight up lying. He hasn't done that at all. He's getting them to start thinking about it.
That is literally what they said, your link supports them lol
Progressive politics is when you just vibe how you feel about things, right?
I specifically said he could decriminalize it at the federal level today. He ordered for it to be looked at potentially, but it has not happened, and there is nothing that stops him from ordering it definitively right now.
The user I responded to specifically said that he already ordered the decriminalization of it.
Centrists consider thinking about doing something to be the same as doing it, and become very angry when people expect tangible results.
I'm pretty sure the executive branch can't unilaterally decriminalize marijuana. And especially not force states to decriminalize it.
I get that the FDA could reclassify marijuana, but the real issue i think is that Congress needs to get on the ball and deal with legalizing it . There are laws on the books that have to be dealt with regarding sale and distribution and banking issues.
Couldnt that be done after decriminalization. Decrim will stop ruining lives and filling jails in an immediate way. People first, then economics would go a long way.
A lot of decriminalization has started with justice department changes. But honestly don't we want something that will stick and not be taken away as soon as a different party is in charge?
I think we want both immediate relief for people and systemic change for laws.
It's neat watching "Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good" and "Politics is the art of the possible" become "I don't want to do it, so nothing is good enough."
The president is in charge of the executive branch, he can decide to decriminalize it overnight and fire any prosecutor that challenges him. Who is going to stop him, conservative judges ruling by decree in Texas? Hahaha.
I mean yeah. That's how it has been working for the last few years. Some conservative lower judge decides to kill an executive order and it works its way to the SCOTUS and they kill it.
You really don't know how the government works, do you?
The marijuana thing is a no brainer. It's political malpractice they haven't done anything on that front.
Agencies within the executive branch have quite a bit of independence, which is a very good thing, because if they didn't, Trump would have done vastly more damage than he did.
Everyone just needs to do the right thing and vote 3rd Party.
My brother in Christ, that is not the right thing.
A second Trump term is everything you hate about Biden plus more shit. Biden still the lesser of two evils, you should vote for him.
But I will say Biden is a fucking moron for doing so many unpopular things late in his term. I guess some of these geriatric Dems would rather punch down on the left than secure democracy against it's biggest threat in decades. I get the frustration.
Who is running third party for folks to rally behind? Moreover, who is running that would somehow overcome both major parties' candidates by drawing enough away from them to win or in some way effect a change in process?
Let me know when there's a third party candidate worth my time. Jill Stein has done nothing to earn my vote, and unless she addresses her anti science remarks, she'll never get it.
Great plan. Everyone just needs to listen to you, and all our problems will go away!
Everybody needs to vote for who they honestly think the best candidate is. If that's Biden, vote Biden. If that's Jill Stein or Cornel West or whoever the Libertarians are running, then vote for them.
Vote your hopes, not your fears. Or, as Jill Stein said, "Don't vote for the lesser evil. Vote for the greater good."
Vote Democrat, but remember they are chosen because they are marginally better, not because they are great.
Do everything in your power to end the rule of a stupid two-party system, for one party going full fascist allows the other to stop fighting for your rights the way it should.
If the DNC wanted to, it could pass ballot & electoral reform. It doesn’t, because FPTP/winner takes all benefits them doubly - either they lose and can fundraise off “red team bad” messaging, or they win power and get their turn at the levers of power.
If you’re politically homeless on the right, anything even slightly to the right of median is preferential to ‘conserve’ the world you’re clutching to. Slowing or preventing change is your mantra politically, because you like the status quo today/previously
If you’re politically homeless on the left, you’re bullied in liberal unity under big-tent centrism, even though it’ll never effectively serve your core interests like right wing unity would. There may be some overlap, but good luck with actual legislative movement on LGBTQ+, unionization, campaign finance reform, alternative policing, etc
Under a different system we’d actually have coalitions and better representation on issues- especially topics with entrenched left-right collusion like foreign policy.
Here's what I don't get about this. If you vote for Trump this time, you know what you're getting. He was already president, so you know what you're in for. Is there really anybody on the fence here? I mean, I understand hating both candidates and declining to vote for either one, but if you vote for Trump, then you agree with Trump.
Yeah it's a real moral conundrum. Do you vote for the fascists who want to destroy the country of America, or the other party who wants to bring people together and have some good social programs going. It's really a very tough and confusing choice.
The side the listener is on believes this to be true regardless of whichever perspective you're speaking from.
The left thinks the right are fascists without exception. The right thinks the left are fascists without exception.
How did those fringe minority opinions suddenly become mainstream as if you can paint a whole population with such a generalization.
I'm not saying both are the same, as one inherently requires the suffering of many to have their desires met. However, both sides will use this "team sport, win at all costs" mentality so long as it resonates with the population they try to reach.
The difference being Republicans have been saying that for... 60 years now?
Democrats have only started seriously saying that since Trump.
You can argue slightly for Bush and retaliation for 9/11. But nobody was thinking the state of American democracy was at stake lol.
Plenty of Democrats allowed nuance for misguided Republicans right up until they voted for Trump a second time. Or saying the quiet part out loud, or preferred convicted pedophiles over the other team.
It ripped the rose tinted glasses off. Most people who lean even slightly left know better now. What your average republican voters says means nothing if you continue voting in fascists lol.
Not sure why the downvotes. Republicans truly believe that Democrats will destroy the country if they win the next election.
The downvotes are because one side has attempted an insurrection, constantly attempts to subvert the outcome of elections, and is saying out loud they plan on weaponizing police against their opposition, while the other is the fucking Democrats. Saying "both sides think that" doesn't neutralize people's genuine concerns that a not insignificant amount of politicians in one fucking party are willing to completely throw out any election that doesn't suit them, which means they are already attempting to take over. Both sides may think that, but one side thinks it credibly while the other thinks it based on absolutely nothing.
My intention wasnt to say both sides think the same, it's exactly the opposite. It's that neither side thinks the way the other is painted.
While both extreme fringes are being sold as mainstream now, the majority of people are simply more complicated than that. People on the right need to recognize that their party has been taken over, and put aside the greed of short term wins to consider if they really back this ideology. You're instantly branded a RINO and tossed aside if you do, and fear arising from cultlike mob mentality is used to keep people at the fringes.
Depending on how you want to count, they've had at least 6 years to consider this. Clearly their decision has been made.
It's also been 6 years of a concerted effort to sway their opinion towards the fringe through bad actors slowly and methodically moving the goalposts.
Some are in the deep end, but many are just blindly following like sheep because they're too busy simply trying to get by. They're not evil by nature, they're just stupid and have been weaponized. There needs to be work to bring them back in a manner that doesn't scare or shame them.
I understand all of that. The OP was just saying that both sides feel the same about each other. He was not saying that one side is better than the other, or that both sides are the same, they are clearly not the same.
The media demonizes everything it can about the other side while downplaying or denying everything their side has done wrong. Everyone sticks to their 'feed' or 'channel' and so only understands their weaponized story of events. There are teams of professionals spinning each of these stories to the best of their ability. There are extremely complex algorithms pulling people further and further over their side of the boat to maintain enngagement and sell ads.
If they only ever watch 'Fox News' then they'll only hear about the good stuff their party doing and fear mongering over the other party. If they happen to see a counter argument on 'CNN' or something they'll see it as fake/misleading/out of context/false. They'll go into their similar minded social media communities and discuss and rant with a group that they see as everybody, validating their concerns.
This is a media bubble, a worsening bipolar extermist movement driven my massive market forces. We have to acknowledge we are subject to the same media bubble effects as they are, the same market forces are being applied to us. Swap the positions of 'Fox News' and 'CNN' in the above paragraph and reread it.
Until people acknowledge this and learn to engage with their opposition in a productive manner, the political climate in this country will continue to worsen. The politicians and media will never engaged the opposition productively as it is against their interests to do so. This bipolar extremism works too well for improving votes, user engagement, donations, and merch sales. Yet in the end, it is us who they are competing over. De-escalation is the best path forward from this. While that effort is against the flow of the system, we are the only ones who can do it.
Democratic leadership and a literal few sane Republicans Representatives do indeed engage with their opposition at the detriment to how their base views either of them. They are a very fickle bridge currently holding our democracy together.
That doesn't mean that either base is incorrect on vehemently denying the others stances. Plenty of people see eye to eye on a multitude of issues. Only Republicans almost unanimously agrees with their opposition but still votes against their own wishes. That's what single issue voting and scare tactics gets you.
You're falsely conflating a Democrats ability to vote with confidence in their parties stances and a Republicans ability to vote against a democrats. The Republican view harshly belies their ability to find an olive branch.
Take an upvote, well said and i can't disagree with you.
My reason in speaking out is to hopefully promote positive change. I see too many people here giving in to the us vs them, 'deport them' mindset that the other side has maintained for so long. Positive change requires one side to act better than the other and engage with them positively.
https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544861933/how-one-man-convinced-200-ku-klux-klan-members-to-give-up-their-robes
I generally agree. There have always been far more bridges crossed with kindness and understanding than there have been in othering your neighbors.
However like we've said, the issues everyone disagrees on are also very real, visceral, and part of of an every growing divide that happens naturally in democratic environments.
Too many people forget that you can compromise on a lot, but once you've gone through everything, you end up with stances that cannot be budged on. They're antithetical to how your entire worldview may work. And that's fine to draw the line, but don't mistake it for something you can't whittle away at. Knowledge and understanding can get past a lot it, and sometimes, you never will. But it doesn't make it NOT the best avenue for non-violent change.
Projection, as always.
But who operates the machine :O :O :O
The machine is set up in such a way that this does not matter. It only turns to the right.
Alternatively, when Democrats (rarely) control Congress, it's by a hair, nearly 50/50. When Republicans control Congress it's much closer to 55/45.
This is largely what leads to the rachet effect.
It does. Biden is able to get away with being toothless and doing things like continuing to build the border wall. It feels like his only redemption is he's not Trump. I will vote my mind during the primaries but if it's Biden, I'm gonna hate that I have to vote for him simply because the alternative is worse.
Really good npr podcast on the medias failing by trying to stay nonpartisan and treat both candidates like they are equal.
Made a point to say there were more articles about bidens dog biting someone than trump saying he wants to execute a general.
Bonkers
The lesser of two evils is still evil. We need a 3rd party.
Jeff needs to leave Xitter already
It's the same thing I was saying in 2020. I'm not voting Biden, I'm voting bye don.
"Both parties are the same" is an obviously silly statement.
At the same time, "Vote for the man who says he can't avoid building Trump's wall, but can use executive power to sell weapons specifically to be used for genocide... Because the other guy is worse." is not a great way to raise voter turnout.
Some of the people criticizing others in this thread have been organizing against genocide. Have been calling their representatives, protesting in the street, etc.
If that's you; Great! My beef is not with you.
If not, and especially if you were telling people to vote for Biden in 2020 because we could "push him to the left"; Maybe work on getting Biden to stop funding genocide and generally push an agenda that will make people want to vote for him.
With current levels of partisanship, turnout is what makes the difference in elections.
Criticizing the very people you're trying to get to vote is at best counter-productive.
Like it or not, if you're campaigning for Biden then you're an embassador for the Democratic party. People notice what you spend your energy on, and what you don't. If you spend more time calling people on the left "stupid" than you do campaigning to end genocide? People will notice, and they will associate Biden supporters with hypocrites that don't actually care about them or people like them.
Being a dick is easier than actually organizing; But it won't achieve your stated goals.
Least deranged "centrist"
I hate that I agree with someone as obnoxious as Jeff "swear words are hilarious" Tiedrich
Jeff may be an edge lord, but he's on point most of the time.
Yeah I tend to agree with what he says but the way he says it is so annoying. I'm surprised that post didn't start with "holy fucking shit!"
I feel like his posts are usually just lukewarm takes on topics that many other people have already articulated (obviously with fewer f bombs). I rarely see him post anything that actually adds anything to the discourse. People have pointed out the ridiculousness of the "bOtH sIdEs" mindset plenty of times for a long time.
If this tweet had been in response to something specific it would be fine, but with no meaningful context it's just Jeff Tiedrich once again shouting "holy fucking shit [insert extremely common left wing opinion here] fuckity fuck" to his echo chamber of a follower list.
This guy and their aversion to swear words. Fucking lame.
Don't forget, with all the bad talk about immigrants, his wife, late mother, and late ex-wife are/were all immigrants.
Ideally, Biden steps aside for a better Democrat. That would make me happy.
It's just sad that you can't vote for the party you agree with because then your vote loses any value. Americans probably can't imagine the amount of parties in other countries,
Image Transcription: Twitter Post
Jeff Tiedrich, @itsJeffTiedrich
gee, who do I vote for, the guy who I sometimes don't agree with, or the fascist dictator-wannabe who warns about immigrants "poisioning the blood" of white people. what a fucking conundrum
Obama-Trump voters break Tiedrich's brain.
How come this genius is still in twitter?
Inertia is a bitch sometimes.
When you use a service for years, multiple times per day, and all your contacts also use it, it's hard to switch even if you hate what the service has become.
What is the definition of insanity, again? But, please, go on and vote for the lesser of the two shits, and be surprised that you get... shit
With this behaviour and this thinking you'll be voting against "The Bigger Evil" for the rest of your life. Your kids will be bullied into voting for "The Lesser Evil" their whole life, your grandchildren will be reminded by their friendly AI legal expert to vote for anyone just not for "Evil Jeff".
Your whole political conscience revolves around a struggle that doesn't exist. You do no good voting for any of these manipulative racists, liars and/or genocidal clowns by listening to paid twitter jesters or hollywood stars. The eChoEs of these shouting matches are so loud now, normal spoken words don't have any weight.
If you put just a fraction of the energy, money or your thoughts into changing your fascist system instead of this useless reality show you call politics every four years (and the years in between), you might be able to die with a knowledge that your children and grandchildren could live in a (more) normal world.
But where's the fun in normality? right?
Ah yes, genocide is something I "sometimes don't agree with"
Disgusting.
Both men enable genocide. Trump is just worst. There is no winner here plus Dems constantly let themselves get punked out by GOP cultists. We have reached the end result of vote blue no matter who.
Most fucked up part is that that Turd is the reflection of republicans. ;/ Which means that half of the USA went crazy, not just one politician ;/ If electorates were decent human beings, republican party would be forced to offer a decent human being for presidency ;/ and not this anti-science Turd..
If it's a constant race to the bottom... who cares. I would rather see us bottom out so that there is a chance that I could see real change in my lifetime.
Just don't vote for the one currently supporting a genocide.
That dictator guy sounds like a doctor, doctors can't do harm, thus vote for him!
Just vote 3rd party. It takes enough people throwing their votes away to break this duopoly. Build new political parties and stop giving money to either republicans or dems. These people are only as powerful as we make them with our money.
If you tally the effects of lifetime policies enacted by Trump vs Biden...
The revolution won't happen if Biden wins 🤔
Who the fuck is Jeff Tietrich? And why does he think he's smarter than Princeton?
"Don't compare me to the Almighty; compare me to the alternative."
Biden is practically saying, "What are you going to do? Vote for the other guy?"
For fuck's sake, this is how you lose. Time's tickin', people.
Edit: Biden will not lose the popular vote, but he can easily lose the Electoral College. Demand more of him while there is still time.
I really think they need to run a primary against him just so that people can feel like he is at least the right decision to make even if it feels weak cause this aggressive "It's someone else's fault and I won't do anything about it unless I get exactly what I want!" Attitude is absolutely gonna make him lose the vote even if it pisses everyone off to hear.
Fascist dictator? where do I sign up?
Jeff Tiedrich is so fucking annoying. I thought I got away from seeing screenshots of his dumbass Twitter posts when I left reddit.
Tiedrich's useless perpetual crying on xitter is iconic of this political era. What he can't see is that he does the Democrats damage.
The guy bombing Palesinian babies and being a Zionazi is not a fascist btw .
Democrat mental gymnastics wow.
Wow Democrats are eating each other alive at the realization that they may not win. I'm a bleeding heart leftist that would really love if we don't backslide into a fascist Cristo nationalist state but seriously this screaming anger that people aren't agreeing with the milquetoast forced pick is definitely not gonna help.
Everyone said that the Republican party would split but no. Democrats will lose again by being angry and not supporting people once again.
A party that looks willing to change to better support the requests of their people is a lot more attractive than one that just wants to push the tower back together and keep playing the same games. And when competing against someone who is able to pretend the rubble is is a castle if you just whip hard enough then you are gonna be against a wall that doesn't budge.
This look of spiteful anger isn't going to get people to back the old man and that's the hard truth that needs to be accepted.
Nobody will ever make me feel bad that Trump is going to win because I'm not going to vote for Biden. Just more blaming everyone but themselves.
One I saw how willing democrats are to sabotage candidates to push ahead "the safe pick" I just gave up. The Republicans went full steam behind their radical, won, committed hundreds of crimes, and are going to win again.
But Bernie sanders and Universal Healthcare? No fucking chance. We can deal with a little insurrection, just throw em in jail. But if everybody got Healthcare, stopped fighting each other, and were healthy enough to fight against the rich people? Can't stop that.
Fucking moron, hope you don't have to explain your dumbass takes to a mother/sister/SO
Real activism is enabling fascists, apparently lol
I heard that a million times in 2020. Mostly on Twitter.
They won.
In fairness, Joe Biden barely scraped through electorally. We're talking a handful of thousands of votes in key states.
He destroyed on the popular vote, but sadly that's not how our system works.
Well it's a year out and we are all just being reactionary to polling numbers but the more the sentiment sticks the more we shape the future. So I guess we just have to see when an election year actually starts instead of doing nothing and fighting about it.
Also can I just add: doing nothing and expecting the same outcome is insanity
The reason people are worried about the poll numbers right now is that now is the only chance we have to put up a different Democratic nominee. I'm not really sure we have a window of time to correct anything if we've already put them up as our nominee.
The window doesn't exist. No one wants to hear what makes them uncomfortable anymore. They are tired of the same but scared of anything different. And so down we will grind. Biden can win and delay this more but we will see and it won't be just because he is there like last election.
No, I'm not saying he's not in trouble or that they don't need to get hold of the message or change policies in key areas or whatever.
I'm saying that the argument that "shaming leftists for wanting to stay at home won't work" or that "spiteful anger is not going to get people to back" Biden doesn't track. We all spent a year in aggresively spiteful anger at a bunch of performative Berniebros all over social media who argued that they would never vote for Biden under the circumstances. Turns out either they showed up, they hadn't shown up before either or weren't that many. Because, again, Biden won.
This whole "why don't Democrats court us specifically" dejection is infuriating, especially because it tends to be a pre-electoral thing only. The way I see it, with the US's electoral system a leftist is at their most powerless around major elections. They get no choice. It's liberal centrists or active fascism.
The right time to apply political pressure to Biden or any other centrist democrat in power is during the term, when they need leftist votes to get past narrow majorities and there is a reasonable opportunity to trade reform for commonplace legislation and normal operation. But pressing before elections? All that gets you is the only one of the two factions you can influence in any way losing all power, and as a result you losing all power.
Vote for democrats and then apply pressure between terms or go start the revolution. But whining about Dems not caring about you just before an election is not it.
It's not just about the fucking Berniebros. It's about the silent majority of Americans who never say shit and just vote or don't. It's about the people that really matter and I'm trying to speak for them. The idiots who will eat up whatever confirms their current ideas of how everything is going that you get from being down on their level and talking to them.
Christ you pick your boogymen and stick to it and direct all your anger and energy at the people being vocal and not notice the everything else.
It's about giving those people an idea of a choice, it's why I have called for Biden to do some debates or make an effort to campaign a little and toot his own horn. Fuck I would love him to be rallied by a leftist and show that he gets more of the middle by being a slow and careful old curmudgeon but you stick to one stupidly flawed argument that it's about the people being vocal.
Whatever. The easy target is the one that puts it's head up to talk. This entire chat is full of people that are scared and simply screaming at the people that try to offer a conversation to point out ideas that they aren't thinking of. But stay with blinders on. Shut up the people that try to say anything and just be shocked and remember our names as the problem if it all goes sideways because someone has the audacity to say something you didn't want to hear.
But that's my point, the Berniebros were the ones saying that the silent majority would stay at home because they were being berated about Trump being an existential threat. Turns out, the silent majority did need the raised alarms and the sense that they needed to get off their ass, so the allegedly arrogant tand not constructive raised alarms were both effective and necessary.
Instead, a sector of the left assumes that the silent majority agrees with them specifically and doesn't get the ripples of people raising their voice to say that inaction based on mild dissatisfaction with liberals is a major, major mistake that may take the US past the point of no return. The left keeps making claims that actually no, it's about making people exicted and hopeful and stuff, which sounds great... except look at the other guy. It's not exciting and hopeful here, it's welcome to the rise of fascism, either you keep stomping them down every single time or it's the last time you get the chance. That's forever now, until the GOP solves their actual fascist problem. Somehow, this seems to be the centrist democrats' fault every time an election comes around, but not while the online left is in between bouts of blaming them for the rise of fascism.
So I say again, I am begging people on the left to rise up in between elections and deploy absolutely ruthless pressure to get structural reform that will lock fascists out of institutions. Once campaigning for major elections starts, though, you rally behind the leader, whoever it may be, and keep facists out with whatever tools are available.
And if you don't do that, then it's your fault as much as everybody else that is creating the scenario where fascists rule the country. Again. It's insane that we haven't learned this lesson yet.
I'm certainly not voting for Joe "I'm a Zionist" Biden.
Though to be fair, I'm in Florida so my vote means fuck all anyway. Maybe if I lived in a state he had an ass chance of winning I'd consider that "least harm" BS.
No, you shouldn't vote Democrat - both parties tend to have unimaginably negative foreign policy that perpetuates the American empire across the globe. This is the greatest source of evil in the world - not regressive immigration policy.
This is even why you should consider voting for Trump, regardless of what you think about him: he actually seems to endorse isolationism to some degree. I think they are probably the same concerning Israel, but it is not illogical to say that Trump would've done something else concerning the Ukraine, or that he would have be engaging with China very differently.
How about the candidate who will hold Isreal accountable. Which one is that?
They’re not on the table.
who's gonna be the Green Party candidate?
Putin's friend Stein
Jill Stein is a friend of Putin?! how did you find that out?
Anyone taking votes from Trump's top opponent is doing this country a disservice. We have a first past the post voting system. Voting 3rd party is a vote against your interests.
This is the only correct take.
Imagine having the gall to run for office and take votes from the establishment because voters actually agree with your platform.
If you're not voting for the blue team you need to get our head out of your ass and show a little gratitude. You don't know what's in your best interest, so don't even think about any other party.
In fact, we should just ban all 3rd parties. That way nobody can be misled into thinking anyone other than Democrats are looking out for their best interest.
that's an undemocratic appeal to the "tactical vote". i respect anyone's choice on how they use theirs, but after having been manipulated years ago on that premise, i have refused to do it again
I'll respect the idea that they have a choice, I will judge them if their choice is stupidly anti-pragmatic, though.
The presidential race is fucked. We're not making it fair any time soon, especially not with a vote for a candidate who doesn't have a chance in hell of winning. The best we can do is ensure that the candidate who'll do the least damage wins. Anything else spells disaster.
In the mean time, vote for better candidates in state and local elections, where an outsider has a chance at winning. And if they do, they have a better chance at changing the system so it doesn't suck.
If you're serioualy asking:
https://www.newsweek.com/jill-stein-ties-vladimir-putin-explained-1842620
Man that still absolutely hurt but glad it's out there to show for why we have to be worried of well funded alternatives with not much tracing on how they rose or got the funds.
The Green party didn't even file all their paperwork for the last election and instead threw a tantrum about it. Pathetic that they are considered the closest to an 3rd party we might have.
i was. thanks for the reply, but what does that prove? i can get you dozens of photos of Biden or some other democratic personality in the same room with Putin
this whole thing about anyone who's not 100% for the DNC's choice of candidate must be a Putin puppet is paranoid
powerful people i don't like nor trust will benefit from Biden's election, and the same can be said about Trump. those are not the reasons to choose one over the other. the same applies to any other election
this whole attitude seems very obscurantist and very undemocratic to me
We can't even hold ourselves accountable
That’s not an option in US politics, unfortunately. But one candidate would probably say “nuke Palestine!” and want to send troops, or maybe not depending on what Putin tells him to do.
Neither of them, lol. Find another wedge issue to make your grand moral stand over.
i naively believed the other lemming's statement but Cornel West's running. if Jill Stein wins her party's primary, that'll be two candidates with a history of condemning Israel's war on palestinians, both having described that state's actions as genocidal
And a vote for either is a vote for Trump. But if you want to bury your head in the sand and condemn the country to oblivion on principle, well hey, it's a free country for the next 12 months.
nope, a vote for some candidate is a vote for that candidate. i'm not burying my head in the sand because i'm not an american voter. i'm a foreigner that's been a victim of lying imperialist presidents from the bullshit land of the free fairyland for a long freaking time
you claim the US to be a free country for at least the next 12 months, and i think you have your head in the sand. just because i think Trump is way worse than Biden doesn't mean i don't know for a fact that he's really bad
i came here because @[email protected] falsely claimed that no one else is on the table
Duverger's Law says you don't know what you're talking about.
yeah it's not the first time you stamp that out of someone.
/s i really think bullying people into the same choice as yours is very democratic
Cry more, propagandist.
Considering you have no skin in the game, do you think it's proper to try and influence the political process of another country?
I didn't like it when Cambridge Analytica did it in my country.
first, most of the world has a skin in this game
second, it seems to me that you're claiming i'm trying to influence US elections because i don't agree with you. i started typing in here because i was mislead by a lie, asked for clarification, and then added information for other readers to clarify that lie
you're comparing my posts to the actions of Cambridge Analytica (lol!!) that's really sensasionalist and manipulative
Okay so technically others are on the table, but realistically you only have two options. My country uses a representative parliament, your party needs to hold a certain amount of votes to enter parliament because each (literal) seat in parliament corresponds to a certain amount of votes. You obviously can't divide a person in two, so you need to clear the bar.
The U.S. has a singular winner. Unless for some reason a very large portion of voters decide to vote for a third party (and the same third party at that), you're unlikely to ever see a third party candidate actually win.
Still not voting. The problem hasn't been fixed. That problem is how we vote.
The metaphorical Joker snaps the pool stick in half every 4 years, and ya'll scramble for part of the stick to outdo the other person.
Not voting is a vote for the dictator.
I'm sure not voting will fix the problem
2 wings, 1 bird.
No though
One of the wings is hopelessly broken and gangrenously putrid.
Which means the bird is going to fall to the ground and be eaten.
Sounds about right.
Yep. In fact I would even say the bird has already died on the ground and is incapable of being resurrected. As someone above said, it's time to hitch our balls to a new bird and start over.
Ok so maybe we attach our coconuts to a new bird then since this one is not well
I'm for that. My coconuts are aching for a bird to be attached to. (?).
Hmmm... Have you tried a swallow? Heard it can be a good way to take care of those kinds of loads.
Yes good advice, a swallow could probably handle the large loads required, especially with these big coconuts.
A giant douche or a turd sandwich, who will you choose?
edit: it's a south park reference people, chill. It's just recognizing that both candidates are shitty. Obviously in this case one is far worse than the other, and it doesn't mean you shouldn't vote... fucking vote
I always hated that episode. A giant douche is functional and useful. A turd sandwich will literally make you sick.
I think you're overthinking it. I just think it's funny how relevant it always seems to be every election
But that's my point, it's not relevant. It's a bOtH SiDeS sAmE enlightened centrist platitude that's just meant to ride the fence to avoid pissing anyone off. "Haha, both the candidates suck, I don't want to vote for either." That's neither insightful nor entertaining. There are real differences between the candidates, the parties, and the various sides of an issue, and pretending it doesn't matter is part of why the world is a fucking mess.
Honestly, for me it's just a reflection of the fact that there are always going to be 2 shitty candidates. It's not some centrist manifesto, obviously Biden is still the clear choice compared to a fucking fascist psychopath.
As someone who is neither centrist nor enamored of either party, it isn't ever "both sides are the same." It's "these two groups actively work together to prevent others from sharing the platform' and 'of all of the possible candidates, these are their best?'
Biden is better than Trump, point blank. Regardless, if Biden is polling poorly, then the Democrats should set aside their pride and pick a candidate that appeals to independents and proper progressives. The Democratic base will vote for whoever the DNC fields, so the real challenge is convincing those swing voters.
Attempting to shame people into voting for a problematic candidate is what got us Trump in the first place. Perhaps its time to listen to those seeking actual change.
Or at the very least, fix their fucking messaging.
Are you suggesting that there is no difference between a turd sandwich and a giant douche?
I'm suggesting that people who quote that line do so in order to imply that there isn't a difference. The whole episode is about how Stan doesn't care for either candidate, and resents being forced to choose.
And yet he still does choose
But does his choice matter? Is the end result functionally different?
You say that like it matters what a Democrat's position is. It doesn't. Not even when they have a supermajority in Congress and control the Supreme Court. They will not get things done.
Status quo is far from ideal, but it's still better than actively trying to make things worse.
The status quo is gradual decline. It'll be better for a while but eventually we'll still be screwed.
I can fix my car if it's got an oil leak. I can't fix my car if I push it into a burn pit.
I'll take that eventually over right now though
Vote abstinence in situations where you dont like any candidate is a valid option and part of your civic duty in a democracy. Not voting for Biden isn't a vote for Trump, no matter how many times you people try to gaslight yourselves into believing otherwise.
But the republicans vote Trump no matter what, and now you’ve nullified your vote in protest
And the Democrats vote for the Democratic candidate no matter what. That they have a better candidate is obvious, but pretending that the core would deviate from voting as they're told is not supported by their past behavior.
It's also essentially you declaring that you don't really mind if Trump gets in. If you were opposed to Trump, you'd actively try to stop him gaining power again. If you're not voting in a way where you try to prevent him gaining power, sure, you're not actively supporting him, but you're still willing to sit by while fascism rears its head. That is what people are judging you for.
To pick an extreme analogy: if there's a child drowning and you're in a position where you could easily save them but choose not to because you saw that child being mean to someone once, no-one's going to call you a child murderer but people are going to judge the hell out of you for being "the guy who doesn't save drowning children".
So yes, vote abstinence is an option. But I'd argue what's more a part of your "civic duty" is to prevent fascists rising to power when you personally have a say in preventing that.
Fine, I'll play.
Democrats and the DNC hold all of the power when it comes to who they field for the election. If their current chosen is polling poorly, if he's not energizing the people that the DNC needs to win, then they have the power to nominate someone who does. If they're willing to risk Trump getting in by fielding the candidate anyway, then they're indicating their willingness to put stubborn pride and the need for control over doing what they know needs to be done.
The Democrats hold all of the cards when it comes to who to run. If Trump gets in because they cling to stubborn pride, then they have only have themselves to blame.
"Maybe if the Republicans get elected on a platform of christofascist dictatorship and enact massive disenfranchisement and roll back civil rights, things will get more representative and we'll see more left leaning candidates in future elections somehow, rather than the people who have promised to ratfuck every election for eternity ratfucking every subsequent election." This is your ridiculous logic.
Actually, no.
My logic: Democrats hold all of the cards. They are not required to run Biden and they have plenty of time to find a candidate that appeals to progressives outside of their core. If they choose to push forward with a mediocre candidate who is currently polling poorly and the worst possible person gets elected, they are responsible for the loss.
They actually don't have time. The first of the primary caucuses happen in less than a month. You're talking about putting a full slate of unvetted candidates in front of a national primary with less than a month before voters would have to choose.
The Democrats made an error. They thought the Republicans surely would nominate someone else. They didn't know Trump would quote Hitler a few days ago. They're trying to run in an election with an incumbent. That's how the parties have operated since.. maybe the beginning. I don't know that I know of a time when an eligible incumbent presidential candidate didn't run. Maybe Washington?
Democrats are making the same mistake that voters are. They're treating Trump like a beatable candidate, and expecting voters to act rationally. But yet, we see people saying the same irrational thing you are, that it's better to sit out and let Trump get elected again than it is to vote for a milquetoast candidate like Biden. That's it's better for the worst evil to be elected than to vote for the lesser evil. It's irrational. And yet, here we are, with someone thinking that the Dems can spin up a national primary for couple hundred million people in a couple of weeks.
Sadly the cynic in me thinks it's precisely the opposite. I think Democrats knew that they would run Donald Trump and just assume he's an easily beaten target. An impossibly high stakes gamble.
People aren't that smart and don't think like that. They think that they are hurting and don't like feeling forced and will look for who is "on their side and punishing up" or even just become apathetic. You are able to see the long picture and be rightfully scared of it but then it's up to us to point that out to the people who have power and ability to do something about it. And raise awareness where possible.
He, nor I, have any logical statement on how it will get better for it being worse just that reality is what is. It would be likely a lot worse should Republicans get everything they want, but the Democrats need to see they won't get votes just for whipping like the Republicans.
You are having an emotional response cause you are scared and shooting the messenger.
I don't mean to be blunt but...are you Russian?
You know that as an american citizen, whoever gets voted in is someone you would have to deal with, right?
Domestically, that would be saying you are no further than "wag finger on a soapbox" towards allowing the voting in of someone who has attempted treason and has said he would go dictator if voted in, while doing speeches that can literally be pulled from Adolf Hitler.
If you are an american citizen, speak like this is your FUCKING PROBLEM
People really stretching to ignore Pride as one of the cardinal sins against a proper perception on reality.
People's inability to change or pivot is truly one of our greatest downfalls even if the stubbornness is one of our greatest tools to survival.
Duverger's Law makes it very clear that you don't know anything regarding what you're talking about.
Vote abstinence means what exactly?
Because not voting for Biden is absolutely not the same as voting for Trump. That I agree with. Not voting at all though is voting for either. Only by showing up and literally voting for neither is the only way to vote for neither of them.
"I made up this Manichean worldview, therefore I'm correct and you're worse than Hitler"
Trump is literally saying that immigrants are polluting the blood of the country. He's calling his political opponents vermin and saying he wants to be dictator (don't worry, just one day!) How much clearer could the stakes be?
I bet you can't name 23 times when Trump was racist! I'll wait!
Okay maybe you can. But how about only in 2023?
Oh shit, you can do that too?
Fine then, at least he didn't say anything racist yesterday.
Oh shit he fucking did?
Genocide Joe really isn't much different lol. Both parties are gradually shifting to the right.
Did you type that with a straight face
Not sure how their face could be straight when their head is fully shoved up their asshole
I sure hope not. In my opinion, the right is splintering off into a fascism regime and more people who once were undecided are voting democratic (per USA Today) than in any prior year.
I’d say there was at least ninety-one differences between Trump and Biden.