Kind of shameful of /e/ to blatantly disregard user privacy like that. Is Graphene our last stand against Orwellian surveillance?

So the nation can share its own wealth instead of bowing to modern day colonialism

"no way to stop this" says the only country where this happens

as per the bbc article linked by the other dude who replied to you, the NRA and other pro-gun lobby groups have urged investigation into the circumstances of Pretti's death. I'm kind of interested in how much that divides Trump supporters who are mostly pro-ice and pro-gun. It probably won't tbh...

these rockstar execs are not only greedy but they are also dumb as shit

everytime WE get into a car with our friends we ALWAYS read the privacy policy aloud to them right guys

Let's take a few seconds to think about the meaning behind this post, conduct a bit of research, then talk with your table partner about why OP posted this here

sometimes i wonder what dignity means to certain artists

For the record, my friend (he uses arch btw) has used Pearson before and I dont believe it actually affected him, so to me the message means "it could work for you but we won't support Linux if something screws up on your end because we're lazy developers"

few words. big impact.

right but consider his stance on mexicans and drug addicts. not much of empath

What life choices do you even make to be the murderer of a 4yo

app to manage router

This shit was a pain in the ass and now learning about this makes me feel even more pissed off as a customer

Thank you for letting us know. I'll be sure to use this information to my best.

no, it's bad in general? why would you say rape and torture is only bad in a certain case?

now theyll rewrite the right click menu AND windows explorer in react

End times, just like the ones in 2012 right? Look at how that turned out LMFAO

just wait til you hear about cis/trans isomers in organic chemistry!

A recent analysis (1) finding a negative relationship between fluoride exposure and adolescent IQ was prominently cited in decisions to end community water fluoridation (CWF) in parts of the United States. However, the quality and salience of that evidence have been questioned (2, 3). Most notably, the bulk of the evidence presented by Taylor et al. (1) concerned extremely high dosages of fluoride—far exceeding levels relevant to CWF policy discussions. None of their evidence came from population-representative samples; most failed to account for selection into treatment. None of the research was conducted using data collected in the United States.

this research was done to figure out the unknown