More likely it will never be profitable because her great grandparents didn't enter the lemonade and beverages market seriously enough. So Coke Cola Europe rules the industry.

...actually looking into it, Pepsi owns 10% of the market, and Coke owns 5%... There's still some room for her if she has the right angle. She should probably try to disrupt the market somehow. Maybe make soda as a drug delivery system? She can piggy back on media hype like "Could this soda cure your diabetes?" Or perhaps custom targetted ads printed on cans? Maybe made-to-order taste sensation?

Tell her to get a degree in marketing and raise a billion dollars in VC money, she might have a chance still.

Massive amount of work protecting a horrible corporation that they wouldn't do for you or someone you loved!

They don't do this when someone's house is attacked. They don't put this effort into protecting vulnerable people. They only gove VIP service to wealthy people and their companies.

There's currently 3 million people with Glacoma in America (whose total population is about 350 million). So if EVERYONE in America (suddenly became middle aged men who) took this erection drug regularly, that number would go up to 3.7 million people with Glacoma.

Knowing how to kill yourself won't increase or decrease the outcome of depression, because that knowledge isn't driving the depression. The problem is the depression, its causes, and its severity (jumping off tall place, or running into traffic isn't difficult to figure out). Knowing methodologies is of marginal influence to how depressed the person is. Severity of the condition is the primary factor to the outcome.

Also, fuck no I don't support the "Rational Altruist" or the "Effective Altruism" movements because I don't get caught up in shitty ass word games and poorly crafted "thought experiments".

Those people are idiots. Those groups are full of really smart dumb people.

Also "Rationalism" in general has a fraught history, from Ayn Rand to Economic Rationalism. People are better off acknowledging that they're not always rational and shouldn't seek to be.

I don't really get what they're going to do with all those data centers, the current models suck as far as output quality and returns on training new ones are diminishing (that's part of the technology, you can't average the internet EVEN MORE and to get a 'better' result)...

...so the best models seem to have been trained well before the majority of data centers were finished and running. Hell the technology isn't that old.

So why all the datacenters? Models can be run on your PC (no connection required)... there's no need for data centers apart from spending whilst the bubble is high.

It must be part of the scam. Stock value bolstered by brick and mortar realestate and the hopes of working for the surveillance state.

Nah, dude got a bit too anti-comm for my liking.

No, the problem is worse than that - it's not very good at ANY of those thing.

.

No way! The Chinese government?? Trying to track users??? They would never!

Every website from Facebook to Google has fingerprinted you my guy.

Unfortunately society is full of "politically slow" people who either don't pay attention, are subject to extra propanagda, or just slow to cotton on... And they sort of screw things up for everyone.

I mean, there are still Trump supporters out there.

The flavors are "Tracker, Bloodhound, Passport, and ID tag".

I recommend that no one use this OS, ever.

...you mean, science fiction?

He he he, after the trial justice will be served, and this billionaire is gonna have to pay the government a million dollars!

....huh, sounds like bribery with extra steps.

So exotic!

Imagine going to all this work and then your dumb ass doesn't include the product names for fear that it will upset companies. Fucking scientists.

They really need to learn that when you find information that is important to public health, and publish it in journal - you are a journalist and should be legally and ethically bound to tell everyone which products passed, and which failed.

Maybe that's why SimpleX came along.

"Information hazard" is a term from the Rational Altruist community that many wealthy people in the AI industry have paid attention to, as well as people like Sam Bankmanfried and at least one cult (the zizians). Despite a lack of reasonable evidense/logic to their claims.

Thus using the term seriously is an information hazard, in that it leads others to not take you seriously.

Fucking "rationalists" and their stupid claim that knowing things is harmful. Also, most lawyers aren't asking about jury nullification, because people who hear that term are probably gonna look it up (giving them a chance to do it)... This isn't a movie.

Fascists, sticking together.

You can run you own models on your own computer using KolboldAI.

There's nothing innately fascist with GAN and Neural Network technology.

The kind of relationship that takes away your health, donating it to someone elses sense of urgency and inability to communicate or talk through problems.