What's important to note is that these placed aren't going back on it because it doesn't work. They are going back on it because of back room deals made with corporate insurance lobbyists and their bought politicians. Profit is always the driving force for privatization.

Stop with the "cosmetic surgery" and call it what it is...genital mutilation!

Do you have any sources to support your claim that these cause an increase in gastrointestinal cancer?

I would like to point out that recent studies have actually shown that one of the biggest risks for gastrointestinal cancer is actually a lack of fiber.

Sources :

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23567349/?hl=en-US

https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/15/3801?hl=en-US

For a movie to be eligible, it needs to have a theatrical run that includes being in a number of theaters for a specific length of time. Since the film was strictly on a streaming platform it initially didn't qualify so Netflix released it in a handful of theaters to meet the minimum requirements.

This was always the plan. A low price for unlimited games to choke out smaller studios and competitors and once they control more of the market, raise prices.

Blue cheese mold is a banger!

https://youtu.be/HmadzQ1uL0s?si=WUJ3_-shyZ_4d_qT

It's technically a calzone. Sandwiches aren't closed on the sides.

Did you read the article? The kid ran out into the street. The driver wasn't speeding or impaired. They did nothing wrong so what exactly do you want them to be blamed for and why are they the asshole in this situation?

Did I read it wrong or is all that is required to meet guidelines to implement gender neutral washrooms accrossed the board? I feel like this would have the opposite effect that the anti-trans movement wanted and I am here for it.

"I'm jealous!" Ftfy

No, it sounds like Canada needs its troops at home to also defend itself against the US.

"Scott Street, Dunbar’s attorney, argued that his willingness to sacrifice his job underscores the sincerity of his religious views, which he said are no less real for being outside the mainstream."

His attorney kind of screwed him here. "Sacrificed" means he willfully knew he would lose his job and chose to walk away. It proves the company isn't at fault here. He knew the consequences of his actions and proceeded anyways. That isn't the employers fault.

That the choices you make have consequences? It's not a view...that's life.

PB&J calzone

It will shift manufacturing desire. It will become cheaper to manufacture in Europe and ship to the US, costing jobs and tax dollars to the US economy. Otherwise, it will cause prices to increase in the US. You're dismissing it as non consequential, but that couldn't be further from the truth.

So you would rather Canada send its troops away and leave itself vulnerable to US action?

The Killbill fight alarm sound.

That would be the healthy way of looking at it, but sadly isn't the case for most who are "proud of their country." The reality is that many just feel proud because they are told to, because it's pushed onto them from the moment they attend school (the Pledge of Allegiance every day in class is an example of this). Being proud of one's country for the sake of it just breeds nationalism, which just breeds extremism.

It isn't yourimagination.

What it really comes down to is risk. In the 90s, studios relied on the dvd release as a second boost to revenue so if a film didn't do well in theaters it had a back up.

With physical media all but gone the studios can only rely on theater revenue which has to be split with the theater itself.

Because of this, execs are sticking with successful old faithfuls rather than risking money on unprodictable new IP.

I can not find it. Maybe I am blind, but where in that article does it say the CRA reports criminal activity to the Department of Justice?