Spyke

headline: trump saves baby from house fire

The story: trump was escaping a fire in his pedophile sex trafficking dungeon and accidentally knocked a crib out the door as he ran by

140
Clentreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Why so contrvived?

In his panic he accidentally carried one of his sex victims to safety.

7
hitmyspotreply
aussie.zone

Let's not make it graphic. We can be disgusted by concepts alone.

-2
hitmyspotreply
aussie.zone

Omg no. Its sad that that's where your mind went first. I'm glad mine didn't. It doesn't need to be graphic to be disagreeable.

2

Then you haven't been paying enough attention to what they don't want you to remember, namely;

Trump and Epstein were inseparable fuck buddies that specialised in underage, unwilling participants.

Trump is a narcissistic, corrupt, paedophile whose every move is to do his utterly incompetent best to keep his history from catching up to him, ad infinitum.

The real wonder of the whole sorry fucking shitshow is that so many gormless fucking cunts are taken in by his syphilitic ramblings or provably false promises, and thus assist the ambulatory binbag of spray-painted second hand cumrags in his obvious grift.

The US as a whole deserves the public international humiliation being collectively reaped for allowing such a heinous example of a human being anywhere near power or influence, let alone celebrating and elevating it to their supposed highest office.

/Rant

2

Hey can you take your performative pearl clutching back to reddit thanks.

-1

Trumps rapes women and young girls and the Republicans aren't mad at all.

I didn't even need an "if" at all.

104
lemmy.world

Probably because he never would and everyone would be in disbelief that someone would make such an outlandish announcement.

It would be more believable if he sent ICE in to arrest the baby to deport it after ICE set the fire.

70

That or he would have been the on that started the fire while trying to give the baby to the Epstine estate.

15
jaybonereply
lemmy.zip

That will make a good story. We’ll call it A Song of Ice and Fire.

7

But only after he raped both the mother of the baby and the baby itself

6
lemmy.world

The fun thing is, we know Trump wouldn't do anything to help someone, anyone, in a burning building.

There was a wealthy, elderly man who hit his head at Mar-a-Lago some years back. Trump noted he frantically looked for someone to clean up the blood because he was worried about the marble. And then the next day, was still bitching about the blood and how the marble looked different.

He's not going into any burning building for anyone. No matter age, no matter wealth, that man is a coward. Always has been, always will be. Their post should be "Imagine if Trump didn't dodge the draft..." because they'd have to imply he wasn't already a spineless coward 60 years ago.

38
boolyreply
sh.itjust.works

There's literal video footage of him standing around, bored, in the Oval Office, seemingly annoyed that he still has to be standing, while people tend to a guy who fainted a few feet away from him.

19

That's a bit unfair. He did struggle to a standing position and then stare like he was trying out a new pair of eyes. I had more fun watching RFK Jr. as the coke was wearing off.

3
feddit.uk

There are two documented accounts of him having fits of generosity. One where he laid on a Trump jet converted for medical transport of a child across the US for an operation; and one where his car broke down, he hitchhiked with a guy, and he paid off the guy’s mortgage as thanks.

Note that both instances quoted simply involved throwing down money.

2

Back in the '80s, trump offered to pay the funeral expenses of a child who had been killed by a bear. He then reneged, naturally enough.

4
lemmy.world

What I find really interesting is that the MAGA type are literally incapable of defending Trump on his own merits, they always resort to some sort of logical fallacy that deflects, distracts, or misinterprets. It implies that they are in some degree aware that Trump is indefensible, but they defend him anyway because they're brain dead and their entire ethos is built around dishonesty.

14

Please make sure to strip the tracking parameters when you share a YouTube video! Everything after (and including) the “?” Serves only to track the people you share to.

22
lemmy.world

For anyone under the age of 16, he is the fire.

26

If Trump raped a baby on live television, live streamed for the entire world to see, MAGAts would still be protecting a pedophile and try to rationalize it.

8
fedinsfw.app

When I went through boot camp many decades ago, my ti had a great saying about ifs, "if worms had machine guns then birds wouldn't fuck with them". One of the very few things I still remember from boot camp. Also release all the Epstein files.

20
jaybonereply
lemmy.zip

If my grandmother had wheels, she’d be a bicycle.

12

Honestly we probably have enough Epstein data to start getting to work

5
lemmus.org

If “ifs” and “buts” were candy and nuts, EVERY DAY would be Christmas.

My 9th grade history teacher said this one time and I say it to my kids now.

3

Of course liberals are going to be mad, hes just going to rape it.

12

And even in the hypothetical, he was trying to molest the baby and he was the one who set the house on fire

10

Because he would have set the house on fire himself 5 minutes prior

8

Trump's first term teemed with moments that Trump did the right thing (they were rare, but, y'know, the broken clock rule) and left-wing pundits would say yeah, it's good that Trump did that.

Then he'd tweet something obnoxious about it. Or when he was thrown off Twitter, would Truth his obnoxious commentary. Sometimes it was about him taking credit, or regretting that he had to do that thing, or walking back is rational statements in favor of irrational ones.

But there were a lot of pundits who believed principle over loyalty, and would give Trump credit when it was due.

11
prolereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Trump's first term teemed with moments that Trump did the right thing (they were rare, but, y'know, the broken clock rule)

I think "teemed with" suggests that it was "overflowing with". Which is like the opposite of "rare".

1

True. I was saying that the pundits teemed with praise for Trump, not that Trump's positive acts teemed themselves.

I could totally have worded it better.

1

I remember someone saying in the first term that "If he took a shit at the Resolute Desk they'd still defend him."

Then it literally happened. And they did.

6

MAGA is so unredeemable, the only arguments they have for voting for them are hypothetical situations for which they can invent a heroic ending for their candidates.

What choice do they have? Run on their experience as crooks, traitors, racists, rapists, and pedophiles?

14
feddit.uk

If Trump went into a burning building the heat would react with the bronzer and he would be laminated into immobility. Not that there's any chance the coward would be anywhere near the fire.

9

Ben Shapiro starts every other sentence with "let's imagine xyz for the sake of argument..."

8

I think also that conservative types like to play pretend cause they don't have critical thinking skills. There is no "If" Trump did this or that. He is the sitting president, he needs to judge by his actions, the things he's always lying about. Trump is an 80 yo man. He physically can't even clip a medal of honor to a soldier, he can't save a cat from a tree or kids from burning buildings. Usually he's the one setting the fires and then lying about it. America wake up.

10
lemmy.world

It's funny

Here in Australia our far right wing pollie had a poster unroll behind her, and our exaggerators now are using the "what if it's a bomb" thing.

And I've been arguing the exact same. It wasn't, no chance of it. Police don't screen for embarrassing posters

7

In the UK after Nigel Farage had a milkshake thrown at him, for the second time, he actually tried to claim that it was a dangerous assault because it could have been acid.

You know because milkshake is well known for transmuting into acid en route, everyone knows that. It's a miracle anyone dares drink it really.

3
auzy1reply
lemmy.world

Gina bought 10% of channel 7.

I wouldn't necessarily believe her popularity. I've definitely seen a lot of comments that are definitely bots or lobbyists

2

The second something says they watch 7 or 9 "news", I instantly lose respect for them

10 is barely any better

1

Indeed and at least the Italian Prime Minister, Meloni, finally had enough of the orange sack of shit. The US giving up to Iran at Versaille, sigh,...stay classy MAGA.

3

The only reason Trump would save a baby is if he was attracted to it. Which he is.

6
lemmy.zip

If this were to happen, it would probably be because he started the fire by burning evidence that implicates him, and only "saved" the baby because he's a god damn pedophile.

8

If there were systemic efforts to improve the environment and move away from coal, republicans would shit themselves in absolute fury and make it a goal to find the nearest Leaf or Prius to “roll coal” on them in revenge.

6

Yes, if you were a member of a pedophile ring and used your political power to see that no participants were ever even investigated for the crimes, and you saved a baby from a burning house, I would still be mad at you for that first thing.

4

One saved baby doesn't undo all the children he raped or the ones he sold to be raped by others.

2

If Trump was in a building in fire, he would shit himself, waddle out on his widdle stumpy legs, make an unhinged post on truth blaming Obama for migrant fires, shit himself again, and the go eat a McDonald's

2
lemmy.zip

Actually, I’d shake the guy’s hand and give him a pat on the back for actually saving someone.

3
tacopleasereply
lemmy.world

I would too but that'll also be the day I fuck Tinkerbell on the back of a unicorn.

1

trump would likely molest if its a girl, or sell it to post-epstein clientele or give it to bryan johnson, or peter thiel so they can suck the lifeforce out of the baby.

2

Yeah I'd still be mad about the pedophilia and dismantling of the constitution and the fascism and corruption.

You wouldn't?!

1

If he did that, which is a laughable premise, is that supposed to make up for the lives he's destroyed?

1

If Democrats didn't suck so hard and people weren't scared of something other than the two we wouldn't have to care

-1
lemmy.world

I think the main problem is that Americans seem to think Democrats are any different

-11
prolereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Anyone who has been alive for longer than 12 years knows they are different.

And yeah, I know. Apparently even suggesting this makes me a filthy liberal.

But sorry, you aren't automatically a fucking diehard Democrat supporter simply because you acknowledge and accept objective reality.

4
Ardhareply
lemmy.world

Also like bro chill, we're all on the same side here

1
prolereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Both can be lacking without being the fucking same. Try inviting some nuance into things.

1
prolereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Yeah I remember when Obama and Biden killed all of our soft power worldwide for no real reason.

I remember when they tore up the existing Iran agreement and invaded them in an attempt to get a worse agreement.

I also remember now that foreign policy is the only thing we're allowed to compare, so really good point!

1

It's a good thing the pedophile in chief is destroying any remaining soft power for the fascist global hegemon. Hopefully it leads to collapse and balkanization!

-2

They both support genocide, they both support the interest of the wealthy(and have been doing so since they were born) they both feed votes into each other, they both terrorize the third world and they both do nothing to address the root issues of your society.

-1
lemmy.ml

Which party is anti genocide? Which party is anti war? Which party is anti billionaire? Which party is anti Israel?

-1

Really? What about human rights? What about social services? Healthcare? Quality of life?

There are massive differences between the two parties.

Dems aren't perfect by any means, but many are for the only issues you think matter and pretending they are the same is why we've constantly gone downhill with Republicans gaining power pulling farther to racism and the right

3

Liberals can't even get to "if" since they're too busy playing "ain't it awful."

-6