Spyke
mildlyinfuriating·Mildly Infuriatingbyairportline

The Spotify Car Thing cost $100, but I can't use it anymore.

EDIT: The only reason why I still had it at this point was because I could use it with other apps. However, now that my Spotify Subscription is cancelled, it doesn't work with anything. It's mildly infuriating because today, I can't still use it with other apps like I was able to yesterday.

Please don't make the same mistake I made. No one should buy this.

View original on lemmy.ml
uisreply
lemmy.world

Sadly he is always right. I wish he was wrong all the time.

29
lemmy.world

I'd check his wikipedia page before throwing around "always" like that.

26
uisreply
lemmy.world

Thank Faust there are times he is wrong! At least I know we live in not the worst world imaginable.

3

Oh even without the controversies, the eating of miscellaneous foot attachments is wrong enough on its own.

Edit: I do btw fully agree with rms being a crude piece of failed excrement

1
uisreply
lemmy.world

Funny you mentioned RedHat's cancelation of Stallman.

-5

I didn't mention that? I don't write on Wikipedia.

But don't you think his views on pedophilia are unacceptable? He says he has changed his mind and that's great but doesn't excuse what he said.

I usually agree with his views on software but the rest is often questionable

8

"Just find another job place to live head unit"

-deliberately obtuse bootlickers

29
lemmy.world

Something tells me they just didn't realize someone would buy a Spotify car play without already having a subscription.

I mean really, you're too cheap for 9.99/m but you'll drop 100 bucks for something your phone already does?

Seems like OP is just in a very unique situation that Spotify didn't expect anyone to be in.

-1
lemmy.world

They say never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by neglect, ignorance or incompetence. But with a corporations I'm pretty sure its the other way around.

4
lemmy.world

I'd usually agree but this product seems exclusively intended for someone who's heavily into Spotify, and the marketing clearly states you need a subscription.

2
lemmy.world

and the marketing clearly states you need a subscription.

So they knew. It was by design.

1
lemmy.world

Knew what? That people buying the device already have one?

You still have it backwards. They didn't sell you the device to get you on the subscription, they assumed only people with money to spend on a subscription would WASTE A HUNDRED BUCKS ON SOME DUMB SHIT LIKE THIS.

3
lemmy.world

Am I missing something, or would basically any old smartphone work in place of this? I have a Pixel which sits in a cradle and takes care of anything I'd use this for. I guess a physical button or dial might be nice, but I have a volume dial on the car dash.

Seems plainly obvious that it'll require a sub. It's a Spotify box.

2

You're correct, I have a five or six year old kindle fire i got for like 60 bucks that I rooted and installed stock android on, it's just a really cheap tablet now. Works perfectly for stuff like this.

My last smartphone would also have worked.

This whole thread is just a bunch of moron-consumer apologists. There are plenty of legitimate reasons to hate corporations and their practices, but this is just a bad purchase and buyers remorse packaged as big corpos fault.

1
lemmy.world

I mean, on all the purchase advertisements they said you must have Spotify premium to use this.

They subsidized the price the device based on the expected return from convincing people to keep their subscriptions. Since it supports other clients they probably also have to manage software updates.

Spotify is a bag of dicks for a lot of other reasons but this really doesn't seem to be one of them.

1
lemm.ee

9.99/m is 119.88/y and it doesn't stop. Maybe OP thought that the purchase was a one time purchase, and I don't really blame him, since why would the thing exist if phones with a subscription can already do that it does?

-3
SCBreply
lemmy.world

I don't really blame him

He bought a piece of convenience tech designed for a specific piece of software, when said convenience tech is totally unnecessary to the function of that software, then got mad that he needed the software

I am shocked that everyone in this thread isn't roasting this dude nonstop. He's an idiot.

3

They just don't consider personal responsibility to even exist. It's the corporation's fault they spent a hundred bucks on a thing your old phone and a 15 dollar magnetic mount could have done for you, because said device needs a subscription service.

I had a guy tell me in this thread that I had "privilege" for saying Spotify didnt expect people without a paid subscription to be spending money on such an overpriced device. OP is throwing hundo's away on stupid shit but it HAS to be the corpos fault somehow, people will toss logic right out the window to keep the cognitive dissonance at bay.

2

Doesn't stop? You sign on the dotted line for a lifetime of payments? You can't cancel your subscription?

since why would the thing exist if phones with a subscription can already do that it does?

That's the exact logic that would lead someone with an ounce of intelligence to go "oh yeah, this product is a completely stupid piece of shit that's marketed toward people with more money than brain cells."

Did it say anywhere on the package that it gets you a lifetime subscription to Spotify? No. Does OP understand that Spotify works on a subscription model? Probably, Saas isnt fucking new.

This is the kind of boy-who-cried-wolf bullshit that keeps corporations from actually being held accountable, because people who want better worker's rights and taxes on corporations look like idiots when lumped in with children like you who consider personal responsibility and thinking for yourself to be too scawy.

1
lemm.ee

I cancelled my paid Spotify account because I can't get them to stop fucking recommending Joe Rogan to me.

203
lemm.ee

I'm moments away from canceling. Splash screens of some bullshit podcast or something I don't want to see. Getting fed up.

58
sol87reply
lemmy.world

Search for Github SpotDL And Navidrome

No need to sail them seas, but maybe still use a vpn, just on case. Fun fact i heard from a friend of a friend: Youtube starts rate limiting after 50,000 audio-only video downloads, until you have a new IP.

15
lemmy.world

I am skeptical of the quality of audio on YouTube. And of full album tracks running together properly.

Am I wrong?

7

Im not audiophile so I scrape audio with newpipe. Downloaded and stream quality are indistinguishably satisfactory.

3

I've also noticed that sometimes it downloads the wrong versions of songs. While my Spotify playlist has the album version of a song, it might sometimes download a live performance audio or a reprise version.

2

It's free. You're getting "free" quality. Actual quality anything costs money or requires theft.

-1
dingusreply
lemmy.world

I have hundreds upon hundreds of songs in my Spotify music library. Downloading them one by one sounds like hell. And then I wouldn't be discovering new music either.

3

If you want to move them elsewhere(or even just get a csv export of them) there are apps for that.

https://freeyourmusic.com will let you pay a one time fee to do it to as many services as you want, it’s a bit slow but it’ll get there eventually.

5

Renting music sounds like hell to me. If the songs can't exist as files on my computer (Opus, Ogg, MP3, etc.) then I'm out.

1

ive donated to slsk. I like the song radio and album radio features of spotify, found one of my favorite bands that way

1
histicreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

leave em sail the seas or tidal for the same price you get better audio so win win in my book either way

4
lemmy.ca

Allegedly, YouTube Music is about to shove podcasts in our faces with a soon to come update.

I'm leaving YTM if they do that. I'll go back to ☠️⚓⛵ and using locally available music.

18
lemmy.world

If you have an android, just download blackplayer and use a YT link to mp3 site to get whatever music you want.

5
lemmy.ml

I've been pretty happy with YouTube music. I got legacied in due to Google Music shutting down and thought I would hate it, but I've had zero complaints. Plus, it comes with free YouTube Premium, so I haven't seen an ad in years.

13
Sippy Cupreply
lemmy.world

I have so many complaints, Google Play music was fine. It did exactly what I wanted it to.

YouTube music is like an alien looked at that app, and tried to recreate it exclusively by smashing it's forehead against a keyboard until an app that started most of the time came out.

30
zournreply
lemmy.world

I would actually argue that Google Play Music was the best music streaming app that I've used. It was great being able to upload music from CDs of small local bands and have it right in there with the other streaming music.

Just today I had a hankering to listen to a specific song through my android auto, and instead of just being able to verbally ask the unit for that song, or even being able to search through the atrocity that is the YouTube Music interface on my head unit, I had to pull over, pull out my phone, search for the band, then click the uploads tab (because uploaded music does not show with the regular search results) and then click the song to get it to play.

15

Yes and the glorious "playing near you" feature of Play Music. That made the best recommendations for local shows, and I mean local, within a few miles, not just bands I'd listened to but always relevant and often small shows! That feature, I found several new bands I liked that way and good live music. YouTube has nothing like that. Also interface not as intuitive, more cluttered. My kids like it better because they do like having the videos available, but as I do not give a fuck about that but do like live music this is still not as good as the Play Music.

2

It's not optimal, and I would like for uploaded music to just show up in the regular search, but there is a top navigation bar where you can just switch between where to search (uploads being one of the options). Also YTM has the upside of showing YouTube uploads as well, I could always find obscure bonus EPs that only came with the physical CD because someone uploaded it, which is really handy

0

It's definitely not Google play music, but I treat it a bit like Pandora twenty years ago and it's ok for that.

1

YouTube music is like an alien looked at that app, and tried to recreate it exclusively by smashing it’s forehead against a keyboard until an app that started most of the time came out.

You think they that much care and attention into the app?

But seriously, yeah, I had pretty much the same experience -Google Play Music just worked beautifully, whereas YouTube Music was a steaming turd on Android. I gave up after six months and two phones and went to Deezer, never looked back

1
lemmy.one

I would say the same myself. They don't do the worst job for music discovery either which is important to me. Amazon Music drove me nuts constantly recommending Cage the Elephant and other well-known (profitable) artists instead of obscure music similar to my tastes.

5

Same. Honestly, I expected YTM to make things worse. That's usually how those kinda things go. But it actually did get better for me. I jumped to Google Play Music because it had better selection than Spotify (at least back then). YTM kept that, but fixed the issues I was having with the desktop browser player sometimes getting stuck. And the more recent support for lyrics that are synced to the music is great.

3
rambarooreply
lemmy.world

Their queueing system sucks. All I want to do is queue up some songs but instead YTM fills my queue with tons of crap I've never listened to before because that's how they make money. They put my manually queued songs at the END of the queue so I have to move them up 20+ spaces. There's literally no way to do it other than creating a custom playlist every time I listen to music, and they intentionally made that take more clicks/taps than queuing. I don't get how people are ok with the YTM app, it's terrible.

I hate YTM and I hate that I can't cancel it because they bundle it with YouTube premium, which my partner uses every day. Screw Google and they anti-consumer manipulative bs.

-2
szmer.info

Their queueing system sucks. All I want to do is queue up some songs but instead YTM fills my queue with tons of crap I’ve never listened to before because that’s how they make money. They put my manually queued songs at the END of the queue so I have to move them up 20+ spaces. There’s literally no way to do it other than creating a custom playlist every time I listen to music, and they intentionally made that take more clicks/taps than queuing. I don’t get how people are ok with the YTM app, it’s terrible.

wrong.

  1. you can disable automatic queuing by hitting the 'auto-play' switch in UP NEXT
  2. you can queue songs by long-pressing and hitting 'play next' (which will put it in front of the queue) or 'add to queue' (which will put it in my the end
1
rambarooreply
lemmy.world

No, I'm not wrong. Option 1 does not exist on my phone. There is no switch.

And the "play next" feature also sucks. I don't want to "play next". I want to build a queue like literally any other music app and that isn't what "play next" does.

Edit: I don't see that "auto-play" switch on the web app in Safari either.

0
szmer.info

yes you are, it must be there unless you're using an obsolete release of the app. Below is a screenshot how it looks like

yes, you can build a queue by "adding to queue".

0
rambarooreply
lemmy.world

So I finally figured it out. this is how that toggle works:

  • it only appears when you manually search for a song or select a song from certain groups on the home page.
  • it does not appear to appear if you select a song from "listen again" or "quick picks" in which case the app forces you to listen to whatever is in their queue unless you manually clear the queue.

So no matter what it's still a bad experience.

1

oh yeah, you are right-ish. it doesn't show up if you launch a "radio", which innately is a automatic, end-less playlist of similar music. I do agree though that this should be more visible in the UI

1

No. I'm not wrong, and I don't appreciate you repeatedly telling me I am when you obviously have no clue what I'm looking at.

It isn't there. I'm on Android 13 with the latest version of the app. There is no "auto-play" toggle anywhere. I'd upload screenshots to prove it but lemmy is throwing exceptions. I've checked every tab and settings page as well.

-1

It's kind of a joke, but Napster is actually trying to get back into it. They hired the guy in charge of music from Roblox to be CEO

1

There's literally a feature on Spotify where you can hide an artist and never see it, fyi

5
sh.itjust.works

Never had issues with that either tbh. I guess the algo just picked up on something for you. That's annoying.

5
lemmy.one

That's really dissapointing, did Spotify seriously release a hardware device that expensive, and mandates a subscription to operate?

It's a shame because it looks quite nice too, and is sadly guaranteed to be e-waste at some point

162
Hyperi0nreply
lemmy.film

Are you kidding me? It's been par for the course as far as car assessors go. Sirus radio was like 100 and still required a subscription. A lot of GPS were that price and most had subscriptions.

120
4amreply
lemm.ee

Don’t know why you’re being downvoted - enshittification as a viable consumer business model was pretty much proven in the auto space.

Just like they want to charge you to use the heated seats you’re paying the gas to lug around anyway

61
gruereply
lemmy.world

Just like they want to charge you to use the heated seats you’re paying the gas to lug around anyway

That's not the same thing at all. As bad as e.g. Sirius or GPS subscription might be, at least with those the subscription is for ongoing access to new data being transmitted to you. In contrast, a subscription purely for the use of hardware already included in the car is literally theft.

11
lemmy.one

Just because it's percieved as normal doesn't mean it's something we should put up with though.

With GPS subscriptions (the ones I'm aware of anyway) they will still navigate you from A to B when you stop paying the subscription, you usually just miss out on traffic updates, map updates and other localized enhancements. If there are any that deny you navigation outside the subscription that's plain scummy IMO.

I'm not familiar with Sirius Radio but from what I can see online, it's a satellite radio subscription service that seems to bring new things to the table (like starting a radio station at the beginning of a last song etc). The hardware appears to actually serve a purpose, i.e. it's the satellite receiver for the radio service subscription. I believe we could compare this to buying a Starlink dish for internet access, and paying the monthly subscription. The spotify device shown here is not a standalone device and is only fitted with bluetooth IIRC, requiring a phone for operation.

In comparison to Spotify, Sirius does not appear to have ever had a free plan - whereas Spotify does... I see is no reason why Spotify could not make their free plan usable on this device.

Edit: fix typo

20
Hyperi0nreply
lemmy.film

The device is free to premium users. It's a marketing device for the premium subscription.

The box clearly states that a premium subscription is required.

4

Glad to see someone mention that the subscription being required for use is clearly conveyed. It’s not like this was some hidden information

1

Assuming you're referring to the Sirius radio, it makes the Spotify device an even worse proposition IMO

Edit: Clarify assumption

1
bdonvrreply
thelemmy.club

Those I don't fault. Sirius has satellites to maintain and they don't get ad revenue.

GPS makers, well making maps on that scale is very expensive. Not everyone can be google and give it away to end consumers by harvesting user data and selling ads to businessplaces.

Spotify though, fair enough to charge for the hardware but once bought should work with the ad-supported version of their product....

5

The hardware is free for subscribers...

If you buy it outright it tells you that you need a subscription.

2
atoccireply
kbin.social

I think I got an Echo Auto for $25 (during the public tests). It doesn't need any kind of a subscription to use as far as I'm aware. It only does streaming still, but there are Alexa skills that let you stream from your Plex or Jellyfin server.

3
Hyperi0nreply
lemmy.film

Yes, but the Echo platform is a tool to gather user data.

0

Man you are seriously going to hate the future lol

0
lemmy.ml

I could still use it for playing music in other apps. Now I can't.

3
Bitrotreply
lemmy.sdf.org

Car thing doesn’t handle the audio, they have to pair their phone to their stereo with Bluetooth or an aux cable anyway.

7
lemmy.world

How is that any different than just using the app on a phone in a mount then?

4

Is that it? I'm sure you can find a replacement that doesn't require a subscription if that's all you cared about.

3

It was free for premium subscribers and was marketed to those who had older cars.

1
FaeDrifterreply
midwest.social

I mean, it's basically a cheap smartphone or computer tablet, with a lower resolution, but nice quality screen, and a giant volume spinner. $100 does not get you much at all in the phone and tablet space. I don't think there's much of any profit margin, if at all for it.

20

Poor-poor multibillion company has to nickle and dime you earn sometging to eat

0
Hazdazreply
lemmy.world

No way to hack the hardware and allow it to be used for something else?

2

I considered getting one of these a couple years ago and saw Spotify was discounting them heavily and even giving them away for free in some cases. I didn't wind up getting one but do wish they would release a simple player + speaker like this for home use.

1

Why would you even buy this? Literally just buy a phone mount and use your phone. This thing was a textbook example of a useless product.

116
lemmy.world

They named their device “Car Thing?” Just looked it up. Why not just buy a phone mount and play through your phone?

112
falsemreply
kbin.social

You can get a magnetic phone mount for like $10-15 that fits in the CD slot like in the picture. Not sure why this is a thing.

54
mihntreply
kbin.social

I have one on my seat bolt that is strong enough to hold a tablet for like $20.

9

My phone mount attaches to my car's air vent and I've been using it for years. Cost maybe 15 bucks.

1
Double_Areply
discuss.tchncs.de

Why not just buy a phone mount and play through your phone?

It has the nice big knob so you can change the music while looking at the road...

12
lemmy.world

Deception followed by coersion is an excellent way to increase shareholder returns.

Why do you hate capitalism?

89
lemm.ee

Deception and coercion are by definition not part of capitalism. If those things are happening, capitalism has broken down.

Central characteristics of capitalism include capital accumulation, competitive markets, price systems, private property, property rights recognition, voluntary exchange, and wage labor.

— Wikipedia

I’ve highlighted the parts the conflict with deception and coercion.

-15
AllonzeeLVreply
lemmy.world

You're quoting capitalism's sales pitch of capitalism.

Go to your local tent city in every city if you want to see what "voluntary" looks like, dying of exposure and police capital defense force harassment while serving as capitalism scarecrows to keep the working poor scared shitless into "voluntarily" showing up to be exploited for already wealthy people's further profit for their unquenchable greed.

Capitalists aren't even willing to admit being greedy, only acting on "rational self-interest." If you want to believe what capitalism claims to be, you do you. If you want to see what capitalism is, use your senses and your critical thinking skills.

16

It's a definition. When something doesn't match the definition, it doesn't meant the definition is wrong it means it's wrong to call that thing that term.

Greed is, by definition, irrational. But greed vs generosity is independent of capitalism.

If you want to see what "capitalism" is, learn what a definition is and how that relates to reality.

If there are people who truly have no choice, then you don't have a free market and you don't have capitalism. However, I will say that I was homeless and during that time my choices were constrained but didn't disappear. I stopped being homeless because I made the right choices while homeless. This "having no choice" thing is simply not true.

-6

I have a car thing, I use it at my desk for media controls. It is pretty great.

But the product description was pretty clear that you needed premium to use it. The same goes for using any third party Spotify client. Shouldn't have expected otherwise.

75
lemmy.world

What is this device? I'm confused as to why it even exists.

Edit: I discovered it is literally called "Car Thing".

72
lemmy.world

I've never heard of it before, it looks like a smartphone that doesn't do anything other than have the spotify app? Like is there any mapping or calling built in? And to lock hardware like this behind their premium subscription is wildly, not mildly infuriating.

23
lemmy.world

Man we’ve hit the point where people don’t even know about Sirius or XM radio do they? You paid to listen and you had to pay for the receiver, oh and likely an adapter to get it to work on the vehicle too.

11
danreply
upvote.au

I got a SiriusXM antenna thing and they paid me for it lol

My car radio (a Pioneer one I installed many years ago) supports SiriusXM; I just had to get the right receiver for it. SiriusXM were having a sale where you'd pay $70 for the receiver but they'd give you a $70 rebate, making it free. During the rebate period, Crutchfield had a sale where they reduced the price of the receiver to $30. I bought it for $30, filled in the $70 rebate form, and they gave me the whole $70 rebate.

I've been on a $5/month promotional plan for a few years. Whenever the price goes up, I complain to them and they reduce it back down. It's a pretty good service for $5/month, since you get both satellite and streaming included. Satellite is good since it works all over the USA - good for road trips.

4

Oh jeez that’s not a bad deal at all, and that’s almost what I was doing. I would just let the subscription/deal lapse and they would call and ask why I didn’t renew. Told them I’m not paying $15 a month and than they offer the $60 for a year or 2 years.

At the time they didn’t even have dedicated car units, you had to have one of their portable units, and an am/fm adapter or tape adapter.

3

All it provides is a simplified ui and voice control, the same voice control as the Spotify app. It doesn’t even play the audio, it is a remote for the app on your phone which is doing the real work.

3

I have the hobby of cracking stuff like that (but mainly windows apps to tell you the truth) and there are many-ish people out there with the same hobby. search around a bit and google stuff like "Spotify Car Thing github" or "Spotify Thing bypass" or jailbreak. Heavily rely on github and russian forums. Also random small blogs

If you're so determined though and nobody else has done it and you're fine not using it for 3+ months, there's a very slim chance that I could find the time to bypass it

EDIT: Yeap it's cracked and it's easy too

68
lemm.ee

And? Their site clearly states that a premium subscription is required.

49
sh.itjust.works

Honestly this is such a stupid product... Just buy an Android Auto and/or Carplay device instead. They are cheaper, offer more features, and don't force you to pay a subscription fee to utilize it.

Fuck products like this one. If you own it, it should be yours to use.

8

Do you have a recommendation for a good one of the Android auto things? They vary so much in price and I don't know if paying more means it's actually better

1

As a consumer, Spotify competes for my money with Bandcamp, who gave their cut to artists throughout covid.

Owning things is always a better model than renting them (edit: exceptions exist, none of which I need to be @ed about)

19

totally agree. and plus i kind of want to be charged money here. i want the musicians i listen to to get paid and be able to continue making music. i don't know if the amount they get paid vs spotify's cut is fair, but honestly if I wasn't paying my monthly subscription id probably be paying $0 and listening to less music.

4

I have hundreds upon hundreds of songs in my Spotify music collection. The people telling me to just pirate my library are absolutely wild. I can't even imagine how long it would take me to find and download every single song. And then I wouldn't have a simple way to discover new music. Spotify is the one and only subscription service I find to be useful.

2
lemmy.ca

I'm enjoying Tidal as an alternative, haven't heard anything bad about them!

3
lemm.ee

I tried Tidal back when "Amazon Music HD" launched and I was on a hunt for the best lossless streaming. My only issue with tidal is their catalogue. It is laughably deficient. In the end I found zero good lossless streaming options and went back to ripping my own CDs.

7

Compared to when I first tried them a few years ago their catalogue has gotten significantly better

About 6 months ago I took my 750ish songs from Spotify over and only the FFXIV game tracks didn't get imported in the move

Compared to like 60 or so percent when I last tried I'd say it's come a long way

4

even more incompetent and greedy

even more incompetent ****or greedy

Napster pays artists more, costs less… but the service was garbage.

2

I mean to be fair, Spotify as a company clearly would rather give millions to right-wing shitheads than ~anything else.

41
lemmy.world

Image Transcription:

A photo of a Spotify Car Thing with the text displaying on the screen under the Spotify logo: "Need a Premium account To use Car Thing you need to be logged in to a Spotify Premium or Premium Family account on your phone."

[I am a human, if I’ve made a mistake please let me know. Please consider providing alt-text for ease of use. Thank you. 💜]

40

I betcha someone in the piracy groups can help you jailbreak that thing so it will continue to function.

Edit: Yep someone in the comments linked you a GitHub project that should work

38

Wait, so let me get this straight.

You purchased a device that presumably has no local storage and are upset that it needs you to login to a server that can then stream you the music?

Or is this an issue of not having a paid account?

I guess Spotify didn't realize someone who didn't pay for Spotify would be likely to pay 100 bucks for a device to stream Spotify, and in most cases I'd say they're probably right.

37

That makes total sense else I'd be getting a lifetime Spotify sub for $100 and a $100 device thrown in as an unrelated bonus.

30

I don't use Spotify, but I selected a song on someone else's phone recently. The first time opening it in years and it opens up to an ad saying "buy our tshirts".

I couldn't help but think times must be hard 😅

28

You paid $100 to play music that you didn't own. It feels mean to put it that way, but it was never a foolproof plan if we're being honest.

27
Googlereply
lemmygrad.ml

You'd be shocked to hear that people purchase radios for over $100 to listen to music they don't own.

36
Grimyreply
lemmy.world

Yes, and after the 100$, they can listen to the radio. Op has a brick unless he pays more every month.

12
Googlereply
lemmygrad.ml

This is my point. The person I replied to said OP shouldn't expect more than what they got. I pointed out this same business model has worked for decades so OP shouldn't have expected the outcome of a bricked device.

1
lemm.ee

Under a rock question here, but do you know of any sites that map out radio stations so you can preview them or note them to check out when traveling about?

I mostly listen to my own music when traveling because I don't know any radio stations that might click with me, and don't really feel like or sometimes have the time to scan for them.

1

Oh, to clarify, when I said my own music, I meant my local files. I'm a weirdo that buys music & syncs it across devices.

That said, I did a little searching after asking this and found a cool little site called Radio.garden that helps find some radio stations around you, and found some cool stations I might give more of a listen to.

1

I'd be shocked if you can explain why that's the same as owning a walled garden front-end that turns into e-waste the second your wallet closes.

-5
alephreply
lemm.ee

There's a difference between purchasing a product and paying for a service.

Paying for Spotify would be the latter.

4
Bitrotreply
lemmy.sdf.org

You’re right. They paid $100 for a remote control for Spotify.

2

One wonders why but each to their own, I guess.

1
lemmy.world

Water is a liquid. The human body can only breathe gases. When you breathe a liquid, that is called drowning.

Boom.

🫳

🎤

I agree, smugly stating the obvious is fun. I didn't think it would be, but you won me over.

-15

Actually, they've developed breathable liquid like from The Abyss. It's been a thing since the 90s.

If you want to smugly state the obvious, at least be accurate.

5
dan
upvote.au

I don't understand the point of this device. Why not buy a replacement radio for the car instead? I bought a Pioneer one and it was a nice upgrade to my 2012 Mazda3 since I can plug in my phone to use Android Auto and get the screen to show Google Maps + pretty much any music app on my phone.

26
lemm.ee

There's plenty of 2010-2015ish cars with dogshit radios that are hard to find, expensive to get or literally impossible to find good replacements for, thanks to vehicle manufacturers killing of the DIN system.

21

A lot of aftermarket radio installation kits come with adapters to make up for the odd sizes. Of course, there may not be kits for every car.

4

My 2012 Mazda 3 has an adapter available to fit a standard double DIN radio into their weird shape. I imagine those are available for lots of cars.

2
lemmy.world

Because buying a double DIN or even a single DIN radio can require buying a replacement bezel, disassembling your dash and often your center console as well, wiring in a steering wheel media control adapter, correctly wiring in the stereo, and having the knowledge to make adjustments when things don’t quite fit or go right.

“[just] buy a replacement radio” is not how it works at all.

13
Tekchipreply
lemmy.world

Best Buy does this all for you for $80, assuming the person is in the US. I expect this is available most places for similar prices though. You can get anything from a BT only unit for $20 online to a much nicer unit with Android Auto/iOS's thing. While the initial cost might be higher the opportunity cost of your thing being disabled is almost certainly much higher, as this thread's existence seems to support. $150-$200 well worth it in the long run to do a head unit upgrade.

4
lemmy.world

And then after I spend over $100 on a decent stereo, $50 for an adapter for my car, and the $80 to have some kid install it for me I'll be $250 in the hole and still paying for a Spotify subscription so I can listen to music that's not shit. Or for $100 I could buy a cheap ass tablet and shove it into my air vent.

3

Or for $5 you can use Velcro strips to stick your phone to something in your car, or for $0 you can just balance the phone on your dashboard.

The cheap tablet or phone mount works well, but a nice radio is a lot cleaner and IMO is worth the expense.

1

Oh yeah, you nailed it. Clearly worked for the OP... I also didn't put a value on said opportunity cost. Perhaps it's greater than $250 depending on the individual. Subjective as opportunity cost can sometimes be. Not trying to ascertain or consider it is at best just short sighted, or perhaps at worst ignorant. Cheap junk, effectively rented according to the EULA, subject to the whims of the rights holders, is never the way.

1
danreply
upvote.au

I did it all by myself with no experience - wired up the wiring harness properly, installed the bezel, connected some sort of adapter so the car alert tones and steering wheel controls still work, etc. I bought the radio from Crutchfield who have lifetime phone support to assist with any issues (I didn't need it though). I just followed the instructions they provided.

1
XeroxCoolreply
lemmy.world

Car radios have become much more entrenched. My 13 Fusion has an external amp. Shit, my 96 Taurus did too. Plus if you have any phone, steering wheel, or other peripheral integration, you often lose those features. OP probably has integrated hvac buttons. Sometimes you can get adapters, sometimes the signals are buried in canbus lines

4
danreply
upvote.au

My 2012 Mazda3 has an external amp under the front passenger seat. I bought my Pioneer radio from Crutchfield and they included an adapter to make everything work. The amp works fine (most radios have a preamp output for this purpose), and the steering wheel controls work fine too.

My car just had a basic radio though. I guess it might be harder in newer cars with fancier radios. People that mount their phone or use things like this Spotify... thing usually have older cars/radios though. The newer ones just have Android Auto and Apple Carplay built in.

1

Manufacturers at removing away from auto/carplay just as fast as it came in. They want you back in their ecosystems

1

But weird, an android auto upgrade kit for my car would cost me 160. The Spotify thing is so not a good deal.

26
Burpreply
kbin.social

FYI, those are known to be full of malware if you buy the random branded ones off Amazon. It’s Highly recommend that people go with known reputable brands.

23

What's one of the reputable brands? All the ones I've looked at have really poor English in their descriptions so I don't trust them

1

They heavily discounted them and then stopped selling them altogether. Spotify has a huge track record of doing that kind of thing with features, much like Google. I’m surprised they still work at all.

6

Weird. Last I looked into an Android Auto update or something like this for my car, it was like $2000-3000. These cheapo units don't seem to replace the functions my current dash screen properly.

I wonder if it's because my dashboard already has a screen so it's more difficult to upgrade. It would need to integrate with the features that already involve the screen like the back up camera, climate controls, Bluetooth controls, etc.

But I mean I just put my phone in a $15 phone mount instead.

1

You literally can’t buy them anymore! Spotify quietly canned the project. Support pages are still up but I can’t find a purchase option anywhere.

I bought one pretty early into launch and even then they were already heavily discounted. It was a weird choice for a peripheral, but personally I really wish they had tried a bit harder instead of giving up outright

25

This type of shit is why I just want a vehicle with a CD player that can hold multiple discs. Then I could just burn my favorite music onto a few discs and not have to worry about not having paid to have access to the music I want and don't have to worry about a song I dislike popping up randomly.

18
feddit.uk

Sell it and buy an Android Auto/CarPlay head unit. Then use Spotify in that. In my opinion, it's a much better experience.

14
elscallrreply
lemmy.world

I just use a Bluetooth -> aux adapter and my phone on a mount. Never wanted a screen on my dash.

8
lemmy.world

Even USB-C is lacking as far as volume is concerned. I recently had to upgrade my 8-year-old phone to a new model that only has USB-C and no audio jack. My car has an aux-in plug and I got an adapter for the new phone, but the max volume is only about half what the old phone was. How the fuck am I supposed to destroy my hearing with USB-C?

2

When playing music from USB-C the audio precessing is happening in the adapter, not the phone. You may want to get a different/better adapter and that should solve your problem with low volume.

This one from Amazon sounds good, gets crazy loud, and is very inexpensive:

USB Type C to 3.5mm Female Headphone Jack Adapter https://a.co/d/40sa5qF

4

The limitation on volume is mildly irritating, but I only notice it every once in a while.

1

Then they should build an adapter that doesn't need a UI. I'd use it. Maybe I'll build it.. WPS makes one button wifi connections an option.

2
lemmy.world

Do you have any suggestions on which one of those to get? There are so many choices but they all have very bad English in their descriptions or spam Instagram ads so I don't trust them

2

Am I missing something, or why would you assume or expect that a Spotify peripheral could be used without a Spotify subscription? What even is this thing?

14

If you use anything by the monopolist assholes, you can totally expect to get enshitified. I swtiched over to Tidal a while back. They support artists, not hate speech. And the audio quality is better.

14

Can I have it? I'd never buy one but I use Spotify constantly in my cab. It'd be nice to have it not attached to my phone.

12

I am sitting here, remembering buying a deck for satellite radio which also required a subscription to use. Definitely not new but definitely stupid in this day and age.

10
lemmy.world

Oof. I managed to dodge a bullet on this one. I preordered it,but never received it / was never charged.

I picked one up for like $5 when they were fire selling them. I've used it like 4 times.

8
Encromionreply
sh.itjust.works

My wife and I use ours (I bought 2) all the time. We like the voice activation from the unit and we like the interface for seeing what's playing better than we do our entertainment systems (we have used cars). It's not a slam dunk but it's good for what it does.

3

I wanted it to let back seat people control Spotify without touching my actual phone, and for that it works well.

1

I bought one too, I think for $75 pre-lauch. Very underwhelming interface... it's barely usable. I think they discontinued them already.

8

That sounds like a Subaru problem, on my Chevy the carplay and Android Auto interface are the same exact size and take up the whole info screen.

My old Subaru wasn't like that either.

9

Lol why did you buy something without reading the fine print. Now suffer and keep complaining. Never buy anything that has a subscription model. If you paid $100 , that thing is yours ans you should be able to use it the way you want. Checkout YouTube Louis Rossman videos for some education.

7
uisreply
lemmy.world

Checkout YouTube Louis Rossman videos for some education.

I think you don't watch him or you are troll(or both) because first thing you is started to blame the customer

5

in my 1998 car i just put in an Bluetooth capable radio with good speakers and a subwoofer and nobody can disable anything because it's not connecting to anything except for a Bluetooth device. i'm never gonna by anything newer just because i can repair this cars myself and i really don't want the mechanics in my area to fix it because i can't trust them to fix it and not make it worse

7
lemmy.world

About a year ago, maybe two years ago? Spotify started sending me feedback requests about the “Car Thing.” I was super confused about why anyone would buy something they could just use their phone for, and I finally caved and sent some feedback saying “I already have my phone, I don’t want more devices in my car. This is a bad idea.” And the requests stopped.

Guess they went through with it. Makes no sense to me. I use Spotify everyday, often for most of the day, I really have no issue with what I’m paying for, but that “Car Thing” just seemed like the most braindread venture.

Just my $.02

7
kbin.social

I think it's selling point is supposed to be voice commands and haptic controls (actual knob and what not). The interface does look like it'd be superior to the phone (at least a non-android auto or whatever Apple's is called) though I dunno if it's $100 superior.

4
uisreply
lemmy.world

Ah, yes. You are at fault, not the corporate greed.

19
MSidsreply
lemmy.sdf.org

I would have expected that the ad supported Spotify would have still worked. There is still a free tier.

2

yeah, it's just access to a website. it's not like they pay artists shit

0

That’s painful. Chargeback on credit card if Spotify doesn’t take that back.

Although why would you need something like this if you have a phone + aux cord + adapter/dongle?

6

That's so sad I really wanted one of these, shame man. I hope you can flip it or return it or something. Don't listen to the people telling you it's stupid, it's a cool idea I had my eye on it as well. Thanks for the warning

5
sh.itjust.works

Spotify is a terrible option to use in 2023. I highly recommend Tidal for anyone with good headphones, speakers, Dac's, etc.

Honestly, I hate to say it, but even Apple music is a MUCH better solution right now.

3
kbin.social

Yeah, nah.

Spotify is fine. Apple Music is just the same but with worse music recommendations.

Looking into Tidal and it seems like a huge problem, who the fuck wants content exclusivity of songs? Its bad on consoles and it’s a fucking terrible idea with audio too. Can’t recommend anyone goes with them for such anti-consumer practices.

35

Just tried switching to apple music for the 10th time. Spotify is just so much better for recommendations and while spatial audio is neat the only way to find out if something is available in it is through the promoted playlists or playing the song and seeing if it says Dolby.

I have car thing and while it's better than pulling out your phone I still wish I had carplay. Have you tried "hey Spotify" on car thing? It hasn't heard me correctly a single time even parked with the AC off.

9

Genuinely curious why you think Apple Music is better. When I got my first iPad in years last year, I decided to try to go "all-in" on Apple services partly to consolidate and partly to save some money. After about 14-21 days, the only service left standing was Apple News+ (and only because the only other option was NewsReader which is 3x the price and I just generally didn't love the UI and the way it worked overall).

Apple Music seemed to have slightly less of the music I searched for (I don't have specifics, it was a year ago) and also seemed to be slower/shittier overall than Spotify. It was just generally unpleasant to use - this, coming from a guy who has plenty of gripes with Spotify's user experience.

I'm all for ditching Spotify (I have all kinds of issues with their general business practices and how they stiff artists, among other things), but like @[email protected] mentioned elsewhere in these comments: "every bit of competition is even more incompetent and greedy than they are." I'm not going to say Apple is more greedy in this case, but they felt less competent.

14
ickplantreply
lemmy.world

I like having a family Spotify account, it’s a convenient and cheap way for 5 people to listen to music. Why are they terrible?

8

Spotify uses 320kbps ogg vorbis when on max quality, I would be really surprised if people could tell a difference compared to lossless.

8
alephreply
lemm.ee

The audible difference between Tidal and Spotify is way overblown even with audiophile quality gear.

Apple Music does sometimes sound better by comparison, but that's more to do with the fact that they tend to curate their music library with better sounding master recordings than it does with what codec/bitrate they use.

The downsides of AM is that it can be a pain if you aren't already in Apple ecosystem, and its suggestion algorithm often isn't as good.

5
Selmafuddreply
lemmy.world

Yep I've tried them both and can pick between Tidal and Spotify when flicking between the same song but if played a random song on 1 service and not the other I can't pick it, Spotify is definitely good enough for me.

5

Yup, and even when doing quick A-B testing, it's usually a slight volume disparity that makes it possible to tell them apart.

The idea that Tidal sounds noticeably better because it offers FLAC instead of a lossy codec is pretty much a myth.

3

Much like movies and tv shows, I've just started downloading my music again and putting it in Plex. I stream it to any device that I can put Plex/Plexamp on (or connect my phone to). Not great for music discovery, of course, since it's only playing music you've added to your library.

5

Nah. Tidal's collection is nothing compared to Spotify's and I, like most people, don't have the equipment to actually benefit Tidal's higher bitrate. I don't even have any wish to upgrade, I'm happy with Spotify's quality. I listen to mostly non-English songs and let me tell you, Spotify is miles ahead of Apple Music there. For English music, I find them mostly comparable. But Spotify has a nice Linux app, so they get my money.

3

Seconding Tidal even without hi-fi because they pay artists significantly better than most services but honestly I just buy my music individually like a caveman and self-host it.

3

Yeah, when they announced this thing I saw this coming a mile away. Sucks for all the people that they scammed with it though. Unless you're somewhat paranoid like me you probably would've thought it was neat, especially if you had an older car without an infotainment system.

3

Wait, you paid for it? For awhile they were giving them out for free to anyone with Premium.

0

Sucks but that's what happens when you support capitalism. 🏴‍☠️🦜⛵

-3
lemmy.ml

Thus makes me kind of glad I still use pandora premium instead. I debated getting Spotify premium again but f that.

-3
Dozzi92reply
lemmy.world

This does? Did you have a Car Thing?

Spotify to me is a far, far superior product. Sure Pandora paved the way, but it's Chrome to Netscape Navigator at this point.

6

I've always had a better experience with pandora anyways. It's a matter of preference too. Not saying people can't enjoy Spotify, I just don't.

1