Spyke

More liberals, people of color and LGBTQ Americans say they're buying guns out of fear

For decades, the image of gun ownership in America was white, rural and Republican, but that's been changing, according to gun clubs, trainers, Second Amendment advocates and academic researchers.

They say more liberals, people of color and LGBTQ folks have been buying guns for years and particularly since Trump's reelection in 2024. This story was based on more than 30 interviews. David Phillips is on the training team of the Liberal Gun Club, which has chapters in more than 30 states and provides a haven for liberals to train and learn about guns. He says club membership has grown from 2,700 in November to 4,500 today. Requests for training, he says, have quintupled.

"The concern is about the supporters of the right-wing who feel that they have been given permission to run roughshod at least, if not commit outright violence against people they don't like," Phillips says.

More liberals, people of color and LGBTQ Americans say they're buying guns out of fearhttps://www.npr.org/2025/11/15/nx-s1-5607064/guns-liberals-trump-administration-people-of-color-lgbtq-fearOpen linkView original on lemmy.world
lemmy.world

I was a range officer while in the military. If anybody in WNC need some training I would be happy to help. Training and practice is the key to firearm safety.

94

It is all I have to offer. The bottom line is train like you fight. Practice with your weapon.

17
rainwallreply
piefed.social

We got a West North Carolina now? Fancy.

When are we getting East North Carolina, South North Carolina, or the holy grail, West East South North Carolina?

5

It's not fear...

It's logical risk management.

And I've been saying for a while it's past the point of a handgun for personal defense. Plated vests and rifles need to be the minimum.

This ain't as bad as it can get, and there is zero reason to think shits gonna get better before it stops getting worse.

64
fedia.io

I'm a leftist and life long gun owner, I go to the range every other weekend and enjoy it greatly as a hobby. I shoot competively in both long range and pistol competitions. I also think we are in dire need of much strickter gun control here in the US. I would say a full 80% of gun owners should not be allowed to have them due to a lack of training and understanding of firearms and their use.

If you're thinking about buying a gun I would suggest first going to a range and taking a basic firearms class. I would suggest finding one of the corporate owned chains simply because your less likely to run into the wrong (far right wing) type of gun enthusiast. RangeUSA is a good option. But really any range will have classes available for first time gun owners, usually for under $100. They also offer rentals once you've familiarized yourself with safe operation and handling. For home self defence purposes I always reccomend a mid or fullsize 9mm handgun. They have relatively little recoil, are plentiful, cheap, and easy to handle.

44
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I was trying to steer people toward a 9mm handgun over a pump shotgun for HD here a little while back and people didn't want to hear it. Almost no one fires defensively with ear protection, among all the other downsides imaging your ears ringing for 2 mins after a singe shot before youre able to hear again, no thank you.

9
anarchist.nexus

They may be thinking as my aunt/uncle do - the sound of the pump action is the first defense. After that the ears are a small problem by comparison to what gets through the first defense.

I'd much rather have a handgun myself, but that may be the mentality.

7
fedia.io

Yea, the whole "sound of a pump action" is really the last thing you want in an SD situation. Its always better to have surprise on your side.

4
anarchist.nexus

Hey, its not my take.

I'd rather not give them a chance to take out a weapon either. But its not my shotgun either.

4

I didn't think it was your take, I was just adding to it. But yea, people do as they do lol.

3
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I have mixed feels on that 9mm v pump shotty for the home debate. Personally I’d argue for an AR over the shotgun, but that’s less universally legal and doesn’t have the same binary roadmap of “870 or 590, who cares” and the AR field is FILLED with vendor trash.

But. If it’ll literally never leave the house and you can shoot it, a 12 gauge pump beats the pistol every day imo. Pick a hallway/stairwell, and camp your chosen angle with said shotgun. Compared to a pistol it’s hands down better; shooting handguns quickly and accurately is HARD. The handgun gives up a stock, longer sight rib/radius, use of slugs, and a much better trigger without throwing money away.

The handgun’s primary benefit as a platform is concealment. That’s it. So if someone literally only has $600 and needs a catch all solution - police trade-in Glock 19/17, a real holster, and (plz please puleaze) a lockbox of some kind. If they can swing another $300 or so, then add on a shotgun.

6
fedia.io

Pistols also have maneuverability on their side. Moving around a house is more difficult with something as long as a shotgun, which is fine if like you said you post up at the stairs or a choke point. But I have kids, if someone comes in my house, getting to them and ensuring they're safe is my priority. Pistols also give you more rounds and easier reloads. It all depends on individual preference and situation. You're right pistols take more practice to use effectively, but they're way more versatile.

5

I hear you, and like you said it all depends on your scenario. Someone on a ranch compound with multiple buildings they need/want to check on versus a RV/boat living alone are dramatically different ends of the home defense spectrum.

Your scenario may be vastly different from mine or someone else’s - which is why I have a hard time giving universal advice. Pick your platform, and test it. See if it’ll will or will not work out at 3am when you’re carrying a frightened child back to your safe area, or if your long gun needs a sling added, or if that 33rd Glock magazine is actually kinda massive and gets in your way.

4

A 12g is a little too big for a home. A 14g works just as well. And breach load isn't too difficult to reload either. Pistols are harder to aim in a panic, shotguns allow for errors in accuracy. Home defense only, of course. Plus 14g make for decent varmint guns too, if you have issues with invading or dangerous wildlife (coyotes, raccoons, opossums, snakes, etc.)

1

I grew up around guns, I'm rather familiar with them. That said refamilliarizing myself with it is an excellent idea.

5
P1k1ereply
lemmy.world

Mossberg shockwave, small, 5 shot, 12 gauge

Even legal in Cali

Edit: can't modify it at all tho :(

7
fedia.io

Modifications generally don't make a gun more dangerous, they're generally about making them easier to operate for the user. Different grips to fit bigger or smaller hands, flashlights so you can see what your shooting in a dark house, different sights for different situations or eye conditions etc. I for one have astigmatism so many standard sights don't work for me and I'm also very tall so a longer butt stock enables me to be more accurate and stable.

6

That makes more sense. I also know these things exist so idk what I'm on about. Think I just have travel brain.

3

Your anti gun in general so I'm not surprised to hear thst

4
Fondotsreply
lemmy.world

Alright, I'll bite, why shouldn't you be able to mod guns?

I'm not talking about something like converting a semi auto to a machine gun

I'm talking about stuff like choosing a different stock or grip that feels more comfortable.

Or maybe you'd prefer a lighter or heavier trigger pull, or maybe you find that your gun's not cycling properly with a certain kind of ammo and you'd like to swap out some springs or other internal components to address that?

Or maybe there's a part that wasn't deburred properly from the factory that is making your gun jam and it needs a little filing or polishing to make it move properly?

Or maybe you have a shotgun for hunting, maybe you'd like to have just one gun and swap between a rifled barrel to fire slugs for deer and a smoothbore barrel for bird shot?

Maybe you want to add a different optic, a scope more suited to the distances you shoot at, or iron sights with colored dots on them so they're easier for you to see?

Maybe you'd just like to add a sling?

4
lemmy.world

Yeah those are fine, I think in general I'm thinking of bump stocks or something. Basic maintenance & accessibility are cool with me.

2

It sounds like you need to think about your word choice better then, because that's exactly the kind of thing many gun owners have in mind when they talk about modding their guns.

And a lot of our gun laws are already incredibly stupid without people trying to drum up stupid ideas like "you shouldn't be allowed to modify your guns"

3

I might be misremembering, but I think even the much maligned bump stock was created as an accessibility device originally. It might be another kind of similar stock that was victimized by the media, but IIRC the bump stock was designed as an aid for veterans who had lost a limb to allow them to use a pistol one-handed.

There's a lot of stuff like that that has been fear mongered by the media. Like suppressors. Everybody has been told that they make a gun basically silent when what they actually do is reduce the sound of a gun from "permanent hearing damage" to "not permanent hearing loss."

1

IIRC the bump stock was designed as an aid for veterans who had lost a limb to allow them to use a pistol one-handed.

The bump stock is derpy and just for simulating full auto. You’re thinking of the pistol brace that you strap to your arm - they both were in discussion for bans around the same era, that’s likely where you got them mixed up 🙂

Pistol braces are in a “legal but the ATF doesn’t like that fact” area atm. Tl; dr they made an interpretative rule change out of whole cloth, got slapped in the courts, and have a permanent stay on enforcing their rule change.

3

I'm proud to say I was able to vote for Zohran in the primary before I left :)

But you're right, moving abroad is incredibly difficult and not accessible to most. You also have to be mentally ready to take the opportunity the second it presents itself. Things are still difficult for my partner and I and we share a lot of grief for the friends and lifestyle we left behind.

6
sh.itjust.works

I’m super envious. I’ve been begging my wife to consider this, but she won’t even listen. She thinks I’m crazy. I joke she prefers her head in the sand.

2
sh.itjust.works

Yup, I was pretty anti gun until about 6 months ago. Now I have three (pistol, AR-15, shotgun).

11
Mike Dreply
piefed.social

Based on your selection I bet you have a large house with some property around it. I have a tiny place with a small patch of back yard.

Raised around guns but have never owned. Been thinking a lot about getting an AR-15 because it is less hassle in California.

Any thoughts?

4

No actually, pretty small house and lot. I just like to be prepared and that load out was the consensus among my gun-knowledge friends for general cover-your-bases utility.

The AR-15 was the first one I got, the others were just in case. It seems like it's pretty much accepted as one of the best options out there if you can only have one gun. It's an extremely well-supported system with lots of options for customization to fit particular niches. Based on my research, I would recommend it. Not only is it pretty flexible, but it looks imposing as an open carry if that's your use case.

I went with a Ruger 556 because it reviewed well as a fantastic budget option and I found a good deal on a used one, but Palmetto State Armory has a well-reviewed option for a tad cheaper.

4
JoeBigelowreply
lemmy.ca

You can make an AR pretty small, even smaller if you get a sbr tax stamp.

3

Didn't know about sbr stamp but i know an AR can small. Figure an AR is more versatile than a shotgun of the same length.

1

Im glad im not the only one. It's generally something I keep to myself. I fear im running out of time to make a decision

8

Guns aren't inherently bad. Gun worship is bad. Gun ownership without proper safety and use is bad. Gun as a toy philosophy is bad. Gun's being taught to children as a weapon to destroy those they hate is bad. Guns are a qeapon to be used fr defense, or a tool to hunt to eat. Guns aren't a hotrod that gets modifications for fun, or a contest to see who can get the most. Teach children they can't touch guns without supervision, keep them locked up. Practice with guns, read or get training on maintenance and safety. If you are a person who thinks about using a gun more than a few times a week or so you probably should question why you think that way. If you have anything but a sick feeling at the thought of killing someone with a gun you need therapy. Guns are a last resort, and they should be respected as the grim reapers they are.

6
piefed.social

Guns are a good example of how everything else went. Like I believe in regulation. Allowing it to be banned on private property and at local levels if the citizen majority want it. Also to limit modern capabilities. At the same time I think it should not be banned nationally or limited to a point of not being able to work as defense or hunting or such (and I mean reasonable not bend over backward like silencers are necessary because you can't be bothered to wear ear protection.) One side looks at me as super anti gun liberal commie etc and the other as promoting murder as such. Admitadely the one side is the average folk of the side while the other is an extreme few.

3
nomyreply
lemmy.zip

Buying into antigun rhetoric is one of the biggest missteps "the left" has made in recent decades.

We have an authoritarian fascist state coalescing as we speak and there are still leftists advocating gun control. It's a losing argument in the U.S. right now. I tell people as often as I can, especially my trans and bipoc friends; now is the time. Get a couple guns (a long one and a short one) and learn how to use them. Learn some basic first aid, you really just need to know how to stabilize someone. Start networking with like-minded people in your communities. The police will not protect us, they’ve proven they’ll happily club senior citizens to the ground and shoot any protesters in the face with rubber bullets while escorting a rightwing murderer to safety. Iran was a secular, liberal state until almost 1980 when they (mostly legitimately) elected an Islamist theocracy; it could happen here.

Our current situation really is the culmination of almost 70 years of rightwing efforts. It’s a long listen but worth checking out How Conservatism Won by Robert Evans. He lays out in a clear concise way “how a consortium of rich failsons got together to fund a network of right wing think tanks and shift American culture in a fun new direction. (note: it was not actually fun at all).” They’ve been very successful and those think tanks are now pipelines used to funnel ideological purists into powerful positions like our current Supreme Court.

The shadowy cabals the rightwing says are behind everything is classic projection again, they're controlled by shadowy cabals of rich people. One of the primary ghouls/traitors responsible for the attempted overthrow of our government on J6 was Roger Stone, the same traitorous ratfucker who began his career working for Nixon and has a fucking Nixon tattoo on his back. It's really impossible to overstate how bad these people are and they're winning.

The coup was successful, they're in power and if they don't want to give it up they won't.

Get to know people in your community. Take an interest in growing food, learn how to fix things. Establish secondary lines of communication and start preparing.

https://www.dsausa.org/

https://mutualaiddisasterrelief.org/

https://socialistra.org/

https://generalstrikeus.com/

https://afsc.org/news/how-create-mutual-aid-network

https://www.immigrantdefenseproject.org/raids/

https://mutualaidhub.org/

13
piefed.social

I mean im still for it as much as I have ever been but its never been something important enough to negotiate for. I won't give up one iota of social safetynets or civil rights or whatever for it. Of course gun control is like regulation to me. I want businesses regulated but I don't want to throw out capitalism.

0
overtherereply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Suppressors are a prime example of how Hollywood has shaped so much of the population’s perception of firearms. You even make a great example yourself by calling them silencers.

Suppressors are a great tool for making a loud hobby less likely to damage people’s hearing (yes, even with proper ear protection) and less annoying to everybody else within a few miles. They don’t make guns silent like in the movies. Some countries like the UK even require them or make them readily available because they’re so obviously beneficial.

6

I really think the folks who get all up in arms about silencers (another legitamate word for suppressors) are being disengenous. It makes guns a fuck ton less noisy and that is what people know. No one thinks it makes them silent any more than a bow, sling, or rail gun is silent. When folks hear gunshots though they get the hell out but if "suppressed" they might react with. What is that. Thats weird.

0
lemmy.world

I'm on the left, never been anti gun but never owned a firearm till this gestapo crap started. I do not recognize the authority of ICE to question me, as a born US citizen I am not required to carry proof of citizenship. They come to my front door I'm not opening it and if they break my door down they'll have my Beretta 1301 answering. I'd rather die in a firefight and taking some scum down with me than getting disappeared to some foreign prison because I had the audacity to be born brown.

44

Slightly unrelated but I live in a liberal county in Texas and am somewhat removed from all this and at the beginning I thought it was the news just making stuff up but I recently visited a family member in Chicago and I shit you not ICE and the police are straight up chasing brown people. If they see a Mexican they will interrogate you on the spot and god forbid you speak Spanish. It’s absolutely insane what we are allowing as a society and if this continues we will have a US citizen killed at a protest in the not too distant future.

27
lemmy.today

MAGA won't back down if they don't get a bloody nose. Be it self defense or a civil war, the good guys need to be able to trade shots when the time comes.

32

California's famous anti-gun policies were born out of Republican fear of the Black Panthers.

27
J92reply
lemmy.world

Is voting in the US not anonymous?

2

Your voter registration isn't, at least. So, for example, anyone can easily look someone up online and see what party they're registered with, along with their home address.

2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pink_Pistols

The Pink Pistols is an LGBTQ gun rights organization in the United States and Canada. Their motto is "Pick on someone your own caliber".[1]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonewall_Shooting_Sports_of_Utah

Stonewall Shooting Sports of Utah is a group of gun rights advocates in Utah. It supports the Pink Pistols' idea that was described nationally in 2000 by writer Jonathan Rauch for the legal, responsible and safe use of weapons for their self defense, recreation and shooting sports.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Rifle_Association

The Socialist Rifle Association (SRA) is a socialist gun rights advocacy group based in the United States, which is dedicated to "providing working class people the information they need to be effectively armed for self and community defense."[5][6][self-published source] The group advocates for Second Amendment gun rights from a left-wing perspective.[7]

https://blog.socialistra.org/official-statement-on-recent-doj-discussions/

Official Statement on Recent DOJ Discussions

The Socialist Rifle Association opposes in the strongest terms the stripping away of gun rights for our trans comrades. Trump's DOJ is far beyond the pale having floated the idea.

It's also worth noting that the major gun rights groups, which tend to be on the right side of the spectrum, also condemned the Trump administration for suggesting that trans people should be disarmed:

https://www.newsweek.com/gun-rights-group-condemn-trump-transgender-firearm-proposal-2125307

The National Rifle Association insists the Second Amendment "isn't up for debate" as senior Justice Department officials have reportedly held internal deliberations about issuing regulations restricting transgender individuals from possessing guns in the wake of a shooting at a Catholic school in Minnesota that left two children dead and 17 others injured on August 27.

The Second Amendment Foundation, a Washington state-based gun rights advocacy nonprofit group, also blasted the Department of Justice's reported consideration of new firearm restrictions, saying it "stands resoundingly in opposition" of any such policies.

Gun Owners of America, a Virginia-based nonprofit with more than two million members and supporters, also denounced the Trump's administration reported plans.

"Gun Owners of America does not compromise with our support for the right of all the People to keep and bear arms," GOA senior vice president Erich Pratt told Newsweek in a statement. "That means we oppose any and all gun bans — whether proposed by Republicans or Democrats. Anti-gunners would happily label every gun owner 'crazy' in order to confiscate our firearms and infringe on our rights. We're not going to give up an inch."

The National Association for Gun Rights, meanwhile, noted that only a Title III court can adjudicate someone as "mentally defective" for purposes of firearm restriction.

"It is a judicial branch function, not an executive branch function," NAGR president Dudley Brown told Newsweek in a statement. "This process — and only this process — is available today as it may apply to transgenders or to any American suffering from mental health issues, but taking rights away from any American without due process is an affront to the Constitution. All ex parte gun bans are unconstitutional."

22
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Remember folks: don't just buy it, train with it.

And if you can get like minded friends to do the same even better.

Personally I'm not a fan of handguns, I prefer rifles but both are good at poking holes.

Also be sure to pick a firearm that takes a common type of round, the last thing you need to worry about is trying to find some obscure round type when you need it.

18
Gormadtreply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

9mm Parabellum

I've never heard 9mm referred to as that (had to look it up to be sure) but yeah 9mm and 5.56 NATO rounds are great choices as they're available basically anywhere here in the states. So is 30-06, 308, and 22LR.

Personally I've got guns that take 5.56, 30-06, and 22LR. The 22LR are consistently the cheapest ones to shoot and I usually buy them by the box of 500. Among my friend group the only deviation is those that have handguns, they've got guns that take 9mm and 38 special as well.

4
sh.itjust.works

Please do not count on 22LR for any sort of self defense purposes. It's a great round for shooting paper targets and small critters, but against a human it has the stopping power of a letter opener. Sure, it might stop someone if you hit just the right spot, or pain might shock someone inexperienced into pausing long enough for you to run, but you don't really want to be counting on either of those in a life or death scenario.

3

Yeah the 22LR is for fun for me not for defense. The 5.56 and 30-06 are quite expensive per shot by comparison so they're shot less for fun and more for making sure I'm still skilled with them.

2

Both are excellent calibers. Their extreme abundance means you will always have ammo available. They also both offer very manageable recoil.

1

IRL events is filled with irony.

Dems are the ones that tried to implement "may-issue" gun permit laws, which delegated the power to issue gun permits to police discretion, guess what happens if a black dude tries to get a gun permit and the officer was white. See the problem? "I have a bad feeling about this guy, DENIED!"

Meanwhile, the 6 authoritarian far-right supreme court justices ironically were the ones that stuck down those shitty laws, and now it's "shall-issue" nationwide, meaning cops can no longer use their discretion or "gut feeling" to deny gun permits, if a person meets the requirements, they are required to issue a gun permit. Makes the process more fair.

Such irony, authoritarians end up making carrying arms easier.

18

Only ironic if you don't see the motivations behind their actions.

Liberals who feared a school shooter or deranged ex aren't the ones arming up now. Conservatives who knocked down the regulations aren't the ones who feel particularly threatened by a liberal with a gun.

authoritarians end up making carrying arms easier

But organizing any kind of community defense significantly harder. There's no magic bullet you can buy to protect yourself from the violence of your neighbors, much less your external oppressors.

A great deal of the pro and anti gun frameworks have been about organizing local political interests into activist groups and police-aligned influencers.

The pro-gun groups have won primarily because their organizations are in tight with sitting administrations, but because they simple have guns available to any dipshit with a credit card and a driver's license.

6
lemmy.world

A reminder to all those who want to buy a gun for protection, get training and not just shooting at paper.

I can tell you that even just being a hunter, you're reaction to a situation that will involve potentially taking a life, you're not going to react the way you think you will when adrenaline is pumping through you.

16
JasonDJreply
lemmy.zip

You saying we should practice shooting at living humans? I'm not really sure what you're implying here...

3
lemmy.sdf.org

There are many exercises to help train your reactions during actual emergencies that don’t involve firing live ammunition at real people. Im more familiar with martial arts than firearms, but sparring works.

9

Shooting competitions can be useful. Especially something like a 3-gun match where you're moving around, reloading, changing weapons, have an accuracy penalty, and are running against a clock.

But the biggest problem there is money. Ammo is reaaly expensive these days, and 3-gun will use up a LOT of it.

1

Yeah, I don't wanna go through the proper training to actually be a useful gun carrying person. I also don't want to carry a gun. Between those two things, I haven't bought one. If I weren't a straight I might have to reconsider.

2
lemmy.world

What if it's a hunting trip to hunt predator animals instead of prey animals?

Wouldn't that be better training because the creature can fight back?

-1
lemmy.world

Wouldn’t that be better training because the creature can fight back?

That depends. What kind of firearms training has the predator animal received and are they equally armed? Otherwise its bringing claws to a gun fight.

8

The hunter can always just bring humanity's most iconic weapon to practice better: the spear.

If you are feeling fancy, a bow.

If you wanna go on a humanity fuck yeah trip, a gun.

There's a lot of choices. What matters is that they develop a proper response in the face of danger and avoid freezing.

2
chiliedoggreply
lemmy.world

Hunting predators has caused massive ecological harm in the US.

Hunt hogs. They're invasive and cause massive damage ecologically and economically. They can also fuck you up.

5

Hunting feral hogs is outdated management practice. It interferes with centralized operations that combat the feral hogs, but also educates the hog populations to be better at evading capture. Drop cages with baiting and cameras are the most effective management practice. Seconded by drones that use infrared to find sounders of hogs, those details are send to a helicopter with a sharpshooter to take out the whole sounder.

TL; DR: hunting feral hogs makes smart hogs and only makes thr problem of controlling and reducing population worse.

2
bobgobblerreply
lemmy.zip

This isn’t entirely true… extermination of apex predators has brought environmental damage. Sustainable hunting is actually a net positive, brings additional revenue to the area and helps population dynamics. Specifically things like how they hunt African Lions today. The pick sick or old animals, it has high barrier to entry so it’s not something you do often and most of the money goes back into conservation and local developing economies.

1

So you're saying thousands of people people who aren't members of the rich, white, cis, straight Republican, male ruling class should spend 200 grand each to hunt old apex predators?

1

It is good that people finally understand why its important to be able to have these. That said make sure if you buy on to train with it. A weapon you hold but cannot use belongs to your enemy.

12

They shouldn't be buying them out of fear... It should be out of the drive for the protection of genuine humanity.

If it's about fear then America has no hope.

11

Good thing it is their right to keep and bear arms!

It isn't a political party issue, it's about defending rights when no one else can or will do it for you.

Gun rights are trans rights. They're gay rights. They're little old lady rights. They're white rights, black rights, legal immigrant rights. They're rights for weaklings, and rights for the strong.

That's the thing about rights - we are all entitled to them!

Now go get yourself some instruction about safety, and time at the range, and don't be stupid with your tools for death ☠️

10
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Can confirm. My local range is full of people of all types. Probably 40% female and all ages. Surprising considering I'm in a red state.

8
phaedrusreply
piefed.world

I grew up in a red family, in a red state. Everyone went to the gun range, including the women and children. It was encouraged, not gate-kept behind their strange gender rules. Probably the only thing that wasn't.

7
lemmy.world

There's also nowhere to shoot in most red states, except ranges and private land. They sold it all. BLM land is almost non-existent and NSFS that doesn't have wildlife conservation efforts (thus making much shooting illegal) is exceptionally rare to come by. So most of it has to be done at ranges. Gate keeping ranges would exclude people from shooting altogether.

1
phaedrusreply
piefed.world

I was making a comment about women and children being at ranges, not that people are gate-keeping ranges themselves. The comment I replied to was implying that red state folks have something against women learning to use guns.

It's been extremely common through my whole life to see all ages and genders learning to shoot, especially in the red states, which is the opposite of what the comment was trying to say.

3

not surprising, women probably face alot of domestic violence from men, or get harassed or stalked by creeps.

2
lemmy.world

Some of the bluest states are the hardest places to purchase firearms.

Ever been committed for mental issue or have a felony or are foreign born, tough cookies.

Some are even putting in financial requirements like WA just passed, so the poor liberals can't get their hands on a firearm.

8

In California being committed only gets you a temporary ban. Five years I think.

Any citations for the other two?

2
lemmy.world

What does Project 2025, "Make a Christo Fascist Shithole," say about gun control and 2A?

5
lemmy.world

I thought that was a good question so I looked it up, not least because one of the right's oft-repeated accusations has been that "the libruls want to take our guns!" which to me means that the right has been thinking about taking them all along.

Historically, authoritarian regimes are NOT big on letting citizens defend themselves against government, which is how the US got the Second Amendment to start with, so I'm still low-key convinced that the long-term strategy here is to create an environment of regular stochastic terrorism until the military is fully on board, and then to react to that public carnage by declaring all privately-held firearms illegal as part of the move to full martial law.

But in the meantime, as the Brady Campaign, a long-established gun control group, says, for Project 2025 the plan is "Guns everywhere."

Project 2025 also seems to have a particular aversion to state-level concealed carry laws, and wants to overturn those as well.

There is a good amount of information out there if you're interested in looking further but that's the gist of it. Project 2025 = guns are good, and lots of 'em . . . at least for now.

11

Good on you for being so helpful. You're what's good about this community. ❤️

Project 2025 = guns are good, and lots of 'em

(Sarcastically) Finally, an unexpectedly bipartisan opinion!

I imagine they had it in their heads that all of those left-of-fascist are cowering hoplophobes who won't defend themselves when abused.

This will bite them in the ass, hopefully soon before or after the tsunami of "find out" from their other ideas does.

I'm of the firm belief that our current society's issue with weapons is based in a distinct and highly politicized lack of education and sense of responsibilities around them.

The more we educate and train as a community, the better prepared we'll be to protect ourselves and our neighbors, and the more the the blowhard cowards who need a big bad boss to do their thinking for them will think twice.

4

Thank you and +1! I find it odd that Project 2025 supports "LIBERAL" gun policies, because when Mango F'n Mussolini goes for the full power grab, he must control the guns.

2

The world is like a ride in an amusement park. And when you choose to go on it you think it's real because that's how powerful our minds are. And the ride goes up and down and round and round. It has thrills and chills and it's very brightly colored and it's very loud and it's fun, for a while. Some people have been on the ride for a long time and they begin to question: "Is this real, or is this just a ride?" And other people have remembered, and they come back to us, they say: "Hey, don't worry, don't be afraid, ever, because this is just a ride." ... and we kill those people.

Ha ha, "Shut him up. We have a lot invested in this ride. Shut him up. Look at my furrows of worry. Look at my big bank account and my family. This just has to be real." It's just a ride. But we always kill those good guys who try and tell us that, you ever notice that? And let the demons run amok. But it doesn't matter, because it's just a ride. And we can change it anytime we want. It's only a choice. No effort, no work, no job, no savings and money. A choice, right now, between fear and love. The eyes of fear want you to put bigger locks on your doors, buy guns, close yourself off. The eyes of love instead see all of us as ONE.

Here's what we can do to change the world, right now, to a better ride. Take all that money we spend on weapons and defense each year, and instead spend it feeding, clothing and educating the poor of the world, which it would many times over, not one human being excluded, and we can explore space together, both inner and outer, forever, in peace.

-- Bill Hicks.

5
lemmy.ca

This is bad. They are gearing up for the next civil war. They just don't know it yet

3

If anybody needs any firearm purchasing, selection or safety advice. I would love to help. Ive instructed basic firearm safety, volunteered as a range safety officer, and have read dozens of arms manuals.

2

I am strongly against citizens owning guns but if it was legal in my country i would surely buy one because of all stupid people that walk around, would be walking around while carrying guns.

1

I always advocate training and joining like minded gun clubs to help you train and gather around a community. Organizations like Liberal Gun Club and Socialist Rifle Association seem like good places to start.

1
lemmy.wtf

Y'know we could have had spaceships each since the 1930s?

*[Edit: No. Seriously. Follow the tech arc from Michael Faraday through to Nikola Tesla. Take a look at the Sonora Aero Club from 1850. See? We never needed rockets. Even air-planes came after the zero-inertia-propulsion innovations. See how much we're kept down?] *

But sure, lets just keep succumbing to this manufactured scarcity and provocations unto civil war, pitting us against each other, falling for pitchforks-vs-torches, buying more pitchforks in fear, believing the rumours the torch people want to take away your pitchforks, or even that other pitchforkers are plotting against you. Yeah, keep believing that narrative from the plutarchs, kleptarchs, attercoparchs, oligarchs, billionaires in the handshake clubs. Maybe they care. :3 Maybe your neighbour is your enemy. Be very afraid! Obey! LOL.

Or we'll stop falling for it already?

PS, 2A means we're all to be afforded access to the best of means... what better than a spaceship that you cannot crash, safe enough for a 2 year old to fly home, can sustain human life indefinitely, can print another of itself instantly, zero point energy powered, with zero inertia propulsion (means it can accelerate or stop instantly, and do high speed right angle turns, etc), for your defence against rotters foreign and domestic?

Do you have a spaceship yet?

Everything else is noise [or worse ~ like the whole guns thing, keeping us down, keeping us divided and conquered, keeping us fearful, keeping us in a prisoner dilemma and tragedy of the commons, keeping us from taking our countries back from the crooked club who couped it decades ago... arguably a century ago. Does anyone like what Edward Bernays (or Hearst, or Anslinger, or Hitler) did to us? No? Maybe we should undo that, and get back to where we should be by now [i.e. spaceships for everybody]. And again, no, I am not trying to take your guns away from you. I'm saying that's a divisive weapon of mass distraction to turn us against each other, to take our attention off the crooks in power. Time to party like it's 1999 (or even 2019) again, and stop falling for the weapons of mass distraction.].

-2

PS(2),

Yeah... I'd probably succumb to it too, and buy a gun or two, if I lived there.

Easy to be an angel in heaven.

-1
lemmy.world

this is just utter horseshit

eye for an eye makes everyone blind well in this case maimed or dead

fuck this timeline

-51

The chances of really anybody being able to successfully defend themselves against an organized armed threat targeting them individually is nil. More guns in circulation and money to gun manufacturers just perpetuates this reality.

What do the radicalized people who tune into the far-right media pipeline think when they see this headline? They likely see the "radical left" arming - the very people they have been propagandized to see as violent terrorists. It doesn't calm anything down, it only further inflames the situation - while the people who make and sell guns rejoice.

1
lemmy.world

this is just utter horseshiteye for an eye makes everyone blind well in this case maimed or deadfuck this timeline

You're right. We should look to history, to see how one should deal with existential threats.

Last century, the world defeated Nazi Germany with complaining and hand wringing.

43
lemmynsfw.com

And forgiveness for an eye destroys society as we know it. Arming against the armed and dangerous is the only way. Except of course, enacting sensible weapon laws, but this is America we're talking about. It's only 500 years old, still very feudal.

7

And forgiveness for an eye destroys society as we know it.

There are alternative systems to facilitate justice just waiting to be explored that don't involve blame or forgiveness on a societal level.

Blame and forgiveness are personal matters, but societally we can hold people who e.g. commit violent acts to account and allow them the chance to rehabilitate and participate in society when they are deemed capable of doing so.

Punitive measures are not an effective deterrent to disincentivize crime.

1

Right when my door is getting nocked down I'm worried about revenge and not, ya know, self defense

5

Bullies, maga, and facists dont stop on thier own. they take and take until they are forced to stop. you arent going to reason your way out of this one. If you ask politely, they will see it as weakness and will take everything from you.

3

And the money train continues to flow to these crooked gun manufacturers, meanwhile your gun is more likely to be stolen and used in a crime than used for personal protection at any time.

1