Spyke
lemmy.dbzer0.com

And all the cocksuckers in the comment section saying "fwee speech has conseqwences uwu" deserve to be duct taped into a porta potty and set ablaze.

7
midwest.social

Y'all should have known better than to say something so trite and fascism adjacent.

That you're surprised it's being weaponized against you in turn is goddamn laughable, but you wanted your dumb little slogan that tried to explain a complex topic as stupidly as possible.

Like just think for one goddamn second about how fascists are going to use the literal fucking meaning of your phrase.

-5
jordanlundreply
lemmy.world

Sooo... I'm guessing the complaints are coming from people who didn't watch it? Because I can't put my finger on anything that was horrible or false or anything.

68
pelespiritreply
sh.itjust.works

My guess is that the right wing propaganda machine to hide the epstein connections, doesn't want it shown that trump takes kirk lightly and doesn't give a shit about his death. It's hard to keep it going if dear leader doesn't even care.

25
lemmy.world

his mocking of Trump's grieving of that dude's death was low and distasteful regardless, to say the least.

Edit (and keep downvoting me if you want):

Trump is a narcissistic psycopath who is incapbable of symapthy that's why he is expressing his grief through emotionless shock. This is the way all psycopaths sincerely express their condolences. It does not mean you make fun of them or make fun of death of someone who is already dead.

Charlie Kirk is meeting up with god in front of all the maimed kids of Gaza which he advocated for their slaughter and genocide. He deserves that and it's ironic how he was killed and the world is better without him.

I want to say a million thing but I can't bring myself to make fun of his death or make fun of the grieving of his supporters or family. That is not in me regardless of how much I disagree, hate and wish harm upon these people.

-26
Aulireply

Trump isn't grieving Trump didn't know who the fuck he was. His team is using it for political reasons. In what religion would Charlie be in Heaven? Ah yes the American Christian religion which doesn't listen to anything in the Bible.

7

But I mean, he didn't even compare Kirk's neck to fountain of Kool Aid, or make fun of the look on his face, mention how he was just about to lie yet again about gun violence before he died by gun violence, or anything.

And it's clear you didn't even watch this anyway if you mention Trump grieving.

1
parodyreply
lemmings.world

Hey do you mind if we try an alternate timeline for a few days

8
lemmy.world

I've been saying that the billionaires and oligarchs — who own the majority of the S&P500 and political class — WANT fascism for the last 2 decades. They are behind it's political resurgence, globally; most have already publicly stated things that prove they are authoritarian sociopaths (Musk, Thiel, the Koch's, Ellison, Zuck, etc).

This explains why Trump has never seen the invite or a prison cell, despite 100 clear as day felonies, why the Dem establishment has never done more than performative resistance, etc.

26
Asafumreply
feddit.nl

They always do. When capitalism starts to falter and the public opinion starts to turn on the system the ownership class goes right to fascism to crush the population.

16

I'd argue that for at least half of them, capitalism is just a stepping stone to their true goals. They didn't opportunistically become fascist; they've always been that way

5
Aulireply

This is why they got rid of him. WTF there was nothing bad I guess making daddy Trump look bad is against the law.

6
lemmy.world

Fucking bitch ass move by a bitch ass corporation capitulating to a bitch ass administration.

180

The decision by Nexstar comes as the broadcast station is seeking FCC approval for its $6.2 billion mega deal to acquire Tegna, a deal that would make Nexstar by far the largest owner of local TV stations in the country.

The FCC would have to raise the 40 percent ownership cap in order to let the deal advance.

Quote from The Hollywood Reporter. Just like CBS with Colbert.

15
cmbabulreply
lemmy.world

I’d argue you could’ve trusted them MORE before the Fairness Doctrine was murdered. Certainly still needed to apply skepticism and discernment though

11

I’d argue you could’ve trusted them MORE before the Fairness Doctrine was murdered

Red Scare politics would suggest they've always been untrustworthy. "Fairness" Doctrine only ever included two liberalized perspectives. Meet The Press wasn't bringing on Michael Parenti and Murray Bookchin to debate David Duke and Ayn Rand.

3
lemmy.world

This is why the fediverse matters. Kimmel or Colbert, right now they can turn to platforms like YT and will still be able to get the voice out.

But guess what. The same corporatism that control ABC control google. You live on their platforms your message is dependent on their approval.

The future is free; the future is federated.

82
lemmy.world

As an immediate illustration to your point apparently Reddit politics has apparently been removing this story left and right.

52
sreply
piefed.world

Out of curiosity, I went and checked the front page of r/all. Of the current top 25 posts, these are the ones which pertain to the Kimmel situation followed by their respective subreddit:

/1. news /2. askreddit /3. cringetiktoks /7. technology /9. nofilternews /10. politics /13. fauxmoi /14. facepalm /18. whitepeopletwitter /23. popculturechat

The post on r/politics pertains to before the show was pulled, but it was posted after it was officially pulled. Some subreddits do delete repeat posts that are about the same story to keep the discussion all in one thread, so maybe that has happened with that subreddit?

[Edit: added slashes to prevent auto-formatting from changing the numbers]

12

I’ll try to find the one I navigated to but they kept getting closed for being “off topic”.

Also I’d argue the FCC making a threat and ABC actually pulling the guy are 2 separate stories.

I don’t think it’s some Reddit wide cabal as much as R/Politics sucking

4
zbyte64reply
awful.systems

If the fediverse was a threat then it would also be a target.

6

How we monetize might need to change. Maybe less ads, more donations? Budgets will have to go down, but that's not so bad if the leash finally comes off.

3
lemmy.world

We just found out when someone does something that all the top supposedly leftist commentators immediately capitulate and actually cry about it like a bunch of bitch-baby neoliberals

4
lemmy.world

Even this framing is dishonest - he didn't make comments about Charlie Kirk, he was mocking MAGA for rushing to weaponize his death. ABC shut down his show for a valid criticism of MAGA.

73

Yeah, it's not looking good for them. Everyone is siding with trump in fear of being targeted.

19
lemmy.world

Why were universities letting this shit bag talk to their students?

24

Cause they agree with him?? Cause he paid them to be there? Who the fuck knows.

8

Especially since he never attended any college or had any education after high school.

8
WindyRebelreply
lemmy.world

Because they are institutions that are trying to provide comprehensive discussion since the world is grey. We don’t have to like it, but that’s probably why they allow it. Plus, yes, they make money.

5
explodiclereply
sh.itjust.works

While they're at it, they should have an astrologist come debate the statistics professor.

6

"I understand your point, well ok, I don't really understand it, but that doesn't matter. Mercury is in retrograde so that explains everything. No need to bring numbers into this, unless we're consulting numerology, then we need them of course."

2

Reporter: "Mr. Krab, why were universities letting this shit bag talk to their students?"

Mr. Krab: "...MONEY."

E: grammar

3

Those are paraphrases of Kirk's words. It might be more accurate to say those are his positions.

20

Especially.since they're apparently paraphrases.

Could be a much more useful list

1

I've seen this before. It would really be a lot nicer if these quotes all had sources. Just showing someone a list of quotes with no context doesn't really scream "credible" to this target audience.

3

They're just getting started. Colbert was fired as a demand to allow the sale of CBS' to Larry Ellison, 2nd richest man, and a vicious MAGA. With Colbert out, the decks were cleared for the sale.

CBS used to have the reputation of being the gold standard of broadcast news. Now it's just going to be one more mouthpiece in the Conservative Propaganda Machine.

49
sopuli.xyz

Phew! Thank GOD We're ONLY keeping True Americans on the Air like people who ADVOCATE FOR MURDERING POOR PEOPLE and NOT People who Quote Dead People!

48
fedia.io

Elon musk, noted free speech absolutist, falls to his knees

33

"Why can't we put all the people that disagree with our speech in jail? Why?!"

Free speech absolutist means they want to be able to say the horrible things they believe out loud so they can encourage others to act on those beliefs. At the same time, they believe its their "right" to continue to hold everyone in their life hostage and force them to tolerate their lies and hate speech.

6
lemmy.world

Canceled my D+ and Hulu subscriptions and wrote in other:

“Capitulating to Trump’s version of fascist America and knee jerk reaction to Kimmel made me rethink why I should give you my money. I don’t even like or watch Kimmel, but you are allowing free speech to be violated. I don’t support free speech abolitionists.“

29
lemmy.world

We need to start poisoning Disney brands.

Never thought I’d see the day the Mouse wore a swastika.

11

Not only do I agree, but I will comment to show visible support. This isn't about Charlie it's free speech.

4
lemmy.world

I cancelled mine too. Clicked other but don't remember seeing a place to comment. Missed opportunity. Well done you, though.

3

Nice! Good on you! Don’t worry about not saying why, if everyone is canceling today then they probably know why. Hulu didn’t have a spot to leave a why but Disney did. 🤷‍♂️

2

Honestly he said more about how little Trump gave a shit about him and how much more Trump cared about his stupid ballroom

20
Aulireply

No it isn't. People are to comfortable and lazy.

2

Absolutely! I've been an ABC News viewer for many years, but I've been concerned lately. This cements it. I'll be switching my news to NBC for the time being.

4
Aulireply

They aren't going to buy design. 2025 wants it to be bloodless and looks like it well be.

2

Okay I know we're all pretty deep into the nerdweb here, but let's not lose the thread of reality here. ABC still pulls close to 5 million individual viewers every night, JUST on broadcast and cable rebroadcast. That ain't fuckin nothing; TV is still an important and influential medium.

15
lemmy.zip

I just cancelled my Hulu account this sucks, my daughter loves volleyball and I'm a football fan

12

I could see some little snitch inside there feeding to their doxxing resources to try to get complainers fired.

3
lemmy.zip

Trump just declared antifa a terrorist organization. We're not even one year into this yet people.

Something needs to be done

10
lemmy.world

I still don't know whether ANTIFA is supposed to be a left group, a right group. Or just some made up entity.

0

It’s not an even a cohesive group or one that exists. Like, I’m anti-fascist. But there is no antifa for me to join. This is 🤡💩 💯

8

Or just some made up entity.

Kinda. It's sorta like anonymous where pretty much anyone can hack a system and claim they're part of anonymous. The shooter could have killed Kirk and said he's antifa, but there is no actual group.

6
lemmy.ca

I knew Trump was coming for Kimmel eventually. How long until American television is all pro-trump propaganda?

10
sh.itjust.works

All late night shows and their crews should walk out in protest.

9
lemmy.world

No, they should not only stay on the air, but lean into this and talk about the situation even more. Being silent on the issue is exactly what those in power want.

11

Great idea. I didn’t mean to imply that a protest wouldn’t also include them being vocal about why they are protesting and what they would do during that time frame. I would assume it would be covered by media along with interviews, etc.

Either way, good point.

2
lemmy.world

Well what are the remarks? What a shit article. It's barely longer than a sentence.

9

Yeah all the articles are trying to leave out the actual remarks because there isn't anything bad about what he said. Maga just didn't like it.

16

Time to use your millions to set up a home shop, Jimmy. Keep doing the thing, but indie style

7

Reminder to everyone to cancel their Hulu/Disney+ subscriptions if they still have them.

7

But I thought that "cancel culture" was anathema to the GOP and MAGA?

Is this something I'm too Canadian to understand?

5

Instead of shitting their pants, they should fight against the system Trump and Murdoch.

4

Shortly before ABC announced the suspension, Nexstar, an owner of ABC affiliate stations around the country, said that it would pre-empt Mr. Kimmel’s program “for the foreseeable future” because of his remarks.

Any creative ideas to turn cancel culture against these bitchass media companies & their dickhead affiliates? It needs to make the impact on their pocketbook to comply with fascism higher than the cost to oppose.

3

Seems like a great recipe for unrest. Destroy economy and even take away any relief valves like Colbert and Kimmel.

Cannot imagine that will make anyone happier with Taco. The dumbfucks that hate Kimmel and Colbert don't watch their shows anyway, so the only way they will be "happy" is that they will sit there with dark little hearts and a smug grin about "owning the libs". But that won't improve their life one iota and these broken people definitely will not be happier for it.

3

indefinitely preempt

So he's on paid vacation. Getting an eight figure salary to do nothing ain't so bad for a guy who got into comedy selling "Women jumping on trampolines" as his main gimmick.

Excited to see what kind of mindless AI slop they get replaced with.

3
reddthat.com

Even worse than that. He started off working a shitty job at a radio station, fetching coffee for coworkers and whatnot.

3
hdnsmbtreply
lemmy.world

What, he didn't start as a TV show host right away? What a loser!

4

I'm not pointing that out to crap on him. In fact the opposite. I'm sure back in those days he never envisioned that he'd become one of the most famous people in the US.

My favorite era of his is watching him awkwardly read disgusting trivia question category names on Win Ben Stein's Money.

2