Spyke
lemmy.world

This is like the square/rectangle thing: "Not all fingers are thumbs, but all thumbs are fingers".

81
Droechaireply

Except for some monkey thumbs that are toes... Apes are so clearly superior even in the thumb area

1
TriflingToadreply
sh.itjust.works

I swear one of these days I'm gonna dive into Wikipedia and find the name for that kinda relationship

1
Cethinreply

I don't know if there's a better term, but a subset is what it is.

2

The thumb is thicker than other digits so naturally it'll be harder to accept. A lubricant may help but the key is to relax and go slow.

57
aussie.zone

It's pretty normal to count the thumb as a finger. I find it strange that you would not.

If you were asked "how many fingers do you have", would you answer 8, or 10? Surely, everyone knows the answer is 10 (assuming no physical abnormalities)? On a fingering chart, music will instruct you to play a note with your thumb with the number "1" and your pinky with the number "5".

52
lemmy.zip

The whole concept of even having a middle finger is a bit arbitrary. When you put your hands on a table, all 10 fingers spread out, the gap between the hands is the exact middle. If you include all 10 fingers, there is no middle finger, but there is a middle gap.

Andy why do we even count the fleshy fingers, when we could be counting the gaps between them? It’s the number of gaps that really matters when you’re holding on to a bunch of things like papers, magazines, forks, sticks, stones, strings, cables or whatever.

-21
Zagorathreply
aussie.zone

Sure, but we don't say you have one middle finger, we talk about the two middle fingers. As in, one per hand. It's not the middle of all your fingers, it's the middle of the fingers on that hand.

We don't count the gabs because that's...not how counting things works. When delivering a bag of apples, you don't count how many gaps between apples there are, you count the number of apples. You have to know that your second paragraph here is a stretch that would make a Republican lawmaker seem sensible, don't you?

26
Prathasreply
lemmy.zip

make a Republican lawmaker seem sensible

Whoa now, hold your horses...

4
Zagorathreply
aussie.zone

Not a comparison I use lightly, I assure you.

Maybe that one politician a while back who wanted to redefine pi to equal 4 would be on this level.

2
Droechaireply

Why leave Pi to mathematicians rather than democratically-ish elected leaders? Pi is far to important to be left outside of democracys sphere of influence

3
lemmy.world

Andy why do we even count the fleshy fingers, when we could be counting the gaps between them?

Each finger is conveniently split into 3 parts. Using 8 fingers we can count to 24 without resorting to any fancy math.

5
Cethinreply
lemmy.zip

I wouldn't. It's easy, people just haven't learned it. It takes probably all of a minute to teach someone to count in binary with their fingers.

0
lemmy.world

If they are already familiar with binary, sure.

There are 10 types of people. Those that understand binary and those that don't.

3
Cethinreply

I'm willing to bet I could teach someone how to count in binary on their fingers who doesn't know binary in five minutes or less. They don't need to know it's binary. It's just a simple rule that you add one and if that finger is up it instead goes down and the next goes up. They don't need to know more than that. Then they just work backwards to get the final count. Knowing this is binary can be helpful, but it isn't a prerequisite.

1
lemmy.zip

That’s the point most westerners seem to miss. There are so many ways to use fingers to count, while the one common in Europe the simplest one possible. It’s like demo version, while some other countries get the full pro ultra max edition.

3
Zagorathreply
aussie.zone

There are so many ways to use fingers to count, while the one common in Europe the simplest one possible

But this isn't about counting on fingers. It's about counting fingers. As in, the fingers themselves are what's being counted when you talk about your "middle finger".

6
lemmy.world

Actually can count to 144 or a gross if you use base 12. One hand for the ones place and the other hand for the dozens.

3

You take one hand and count with the thumb as 1 and the pinky as 5 and the middle number is 3. If you switch and start with the pinky as 1 and the thumb as 5 the middle finger is still the middle number. Talking about the gaps can be useful but anatomically we name things for what’s there and what’s not there and we talk about fingers much more than we talk about the gaps

5
ttrpg.network

There are ten digits in our numeral system, and the thumb is neither a 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9.

3
CmdrShepard42reply
lemm.ee

If you put a fake mustache on that 0, it sure looks like a thumb.

3

Can't tell if this is a list of Roman Numerals or the names of some of Elon Musk's kids

1

All of them are fingers. Thumbs are fingers, but a finger is not necessarily a thumb. I dont know where people get the idea that a thumb is not a finger. So many common sayings reinforce that it is. "Counting on your fingers (including your thumbs)", healthy babies have "Ten fingers, ten toes", "What did the five fingers say to the face... slap", "high five", "five finger discount", etc. Also, honorable mention to Princess Bride's Inigo Montoya searching for "the 6 fingered man" which includes his thumb. "Middle finger" is not the only thing that makes no sense if you don't accept that the thumb is a finger.

29
KubeRootreply
discuss.tchncs.de

I don't think that's right? I know polish has a separate word, and sampling in Google translate seems to show separate words in German, french and Spanish. Maybe I got lucky and hit the exceptions, but it seems to commonly be a separate word.

3

I only know Japanese, but it is 親指 (oya yubi) which means parent-finger.

2

Not sure about other languages, but in polish the thumb is "kciuk", while the rest are variants on finger - "palec wskazujący", "palec środkowy"

Edit: checking google translate, German seems to be the same, with the thumb being a distinct word, and the rest being compound words of "finger"

1
Quadhammerreply
lemmy.world

Its a thumb. Its its own thing. If we had only 5 fingers we would be INFERIOR BEINGS

glares at spider monkies

Edit: apparently sponkeys have 4 fingers on their hands and thumbs on their feet

3
Quadhammerreply
lemmy.world

Its a thumb. Its oppsable. If you had 2+ thumbs on each hand we would probably differentiate them more

1

It is a finger but its more of a thumb than a finger. It has its own function and does thumb things

1
Lv_InSaNe_vLreply
lemmy.world

Are your fingers not opposable? I can move all of my fingers and touch the other 4?

1

Opposable, meaning positioned in the opposite. Guys look if you cant look at your thumbs and tell they are different than your other fingers I dont know what to tell you.

-1
MrScottyTayreply
sh.itjust.works

Nah it's the thumb finger, like the index finger etc. We have fully truncated it to just thumb because of how it feels more unique to the others. Doesn't mean it no longer fits the categorisation though.

4
sugarfoot00reply
lemmy.ca

We have fully truncated it to just thumb because of how it feels more unique to the others

Kinda like the goalie on a hockey team or the drummer in a band. Still on the team, just a bit weirder.

5

you count your pinky as a finger ? it is not a finger; it is a pinky.

with the thumb being a thumb and as we have previously discussed about pinky leaves three fingers and certainly a middle one

23
kbin.earth

I used to genuinely argue that it wasn't a finger bc it had only two segments, not three. I've since realized that there is a third and I'm fucking stupid.

23
sugarfoot00reply
lemmy.ca

Your original instinct was actually correct. Fingers have the metacarpal, proximal phalange, middle phalange, and distal phalange. The thumb doesn't have a middle phalange. The proximal and distal phalange connect directly to each other.

4

I may or may not have just started feeling up my hand while wiggling my fingers to check this

1
JigglySacklesreply
lemmy.world

Not unless they are on your hand. Either way though they are phalanges.

6
remotelovereply
lemmy.ca

Probably because of its unique structure. It is slightly different than the rest of your fingers. I wouldn't consider it different enough to exclude it from being a finger though.

3

"middle finger" is "the finger in the middle of the digits" not "the finger on the middle of the fingers"

9
madjo
feddit.nl

Why do you accept your pinky as a finger?

7

When I was in elementary school I tried to start a protest during the break by getting on the desk and proclaiming that we need to stop the discrimination of the middle finger, it is a finger like the others and should be allowed to stand on its own just like the other fingers. Needless to say I held up my middle fingers during that passionate speech. I was also very sincere about it, not emotional, but I did find it unjust. I'm not sure where I am going with this but it was weighing on my chest for too long and needed to get out finally. Thanks for reading.

7
feddit.org

You have three fingers named fingers.
Index finger, ring finger and middle finger. The middle finger is in the middle of the three. Thumb and pinky are both outliers.

2
guy
piefed.social

I got shocked when I learned my SO had learnt we have only four fingers. And a thumb.
I mean..

2

Have you ever thought that it's called the middle finger but it's actually the long finger?

1