Spyke
reddit·RedditbyAmju Wolf

Reddit purges all NSFW subreddits

Something big is happening, as Reddit seems to have purged literally every NSFW sub they know. Reason is always "unmoderated" despite some of the banned subreddits being fully moderated.


Edit: seems to have been a bug in automation (thanks @[email protected]):

https://old.reddit.com/r/ModSupport/comments/1ii67mt/_/mb3fewv

It's still a good reminder on how quickly a community (or communities) thousands of people enjoy and in some cases rely upon can disappear.

View original on pawb.social

As a quick reminder: don't expect them to handle your load (lol) for free. If you are a gooner/goonette with some income, leave a tip for the server costs and consider volunteering for mod duties if you have time and some internet social skills. If you value your nsfw communities, they don't exist without work, like any other community.

142
sh.itjust.works

Are they the only porn instance? I am surprised at little porn I see on here and when I do it's all lemmynsfw.

12
feddit.uk

Hosting NSFW content is an absolute ball-ache, so a lot of instances that are not NSFW focussed do not host it.
In the early days of feddit.uk, we decided to go the path of SFW, to simplify things.
I absolutely salute the lemmy-nsfw admins in taking that load on.
And it makes a lot of sense: If you're going to deal with the headaches, you might as well focus entirely on them!

12

As much as it sucks to say, it wouldn't surprise me if this stuff on Reddit is for the same reason.

2

Isnt it harder to host that kind of stuff, like you need certain providers, prob a bitch to moderate

9

r/transgender_surgeries wasn't porn. It was a community outlet for results so people could understand what to expect. Queer folk always get swept up with porn, cishet only see us as a "kink" and assume our existence is entirely sexual.

It's fucking infuriating.

206
dumplesreply
midwest.social

Queer folk always get swept up with porn, cishet only see us as a “kink” and assume our existence is entirely sexual.

This is the whole point of these porn bans is to remove queer people from the internet. The porn cover just allows it to happen. So whenever you see anything about porn bans think queer ban first and then some porn removal that comes right back

95
eldavireply
lemmy.ml

it's telling that they target trans content; but leave gay content alone.

19
dumplesreply
midwest.social

They knew that their attacks on gay people weren't as popular as they once were so they are taking the exact same tactics and language and moving it towards Trans people. It both predictable and sad at the same time

31
eldavireply
lemmy.ml

it's sad, but expected from conservatives; the real sadness is an "ally" like biden who didn't enact the equal rights amendment that would help protect trans people from the legal version of this shit and then very publicly pretended that he did.

15
nomyreply
lemmy.zip

Why are people still talking about Biden? He's not the president and I thought we all agreed he was a feeble brained old centrist who needed to gtfo the way. Living rent free etc.

2
eldavireply
lemmy.ml

The damage he allowed to happen doesn't magically disappear once he left office

0

The damage they've all allowed going back decades. He's bought and paid for just like every other pol. None of them are on our side and shouldn't be treated like they are.

1
lemmy.world

They lost the chance to scapegoat the gays after they failed to in the 80s during the AIDS epidemic

Now there's too many gay people in the population to keep them down.

Once we get over this hurdle the same will be true for Trans people.

12
clifreply
lemmy.world

Now there's too many gay people in the population to keep them down.

Well if we made more gay people, let's just make more trans people. Problem solved!

9

let’s just make more trans people. Problem solved!

This is literally what right wingers accuse trans people trying to engage with kids in public of doing. Like trans story time, or trans teachers. That they're going to trans their children, like it's some kind of vampire curse.

2
lemmy.world

The old ass fascists trying to hold together their plutocracy suppress anything that goes against their patriarchal values.

Even looking at it as a fetish, trans porn has been skyrocketing in popularity

https://www.pornhub.com/insights/transgender-searches

And this terrifies right wingers

The current patriarchy sees non-binary people as a threat to their heirachies. If the line between man and woman gets blurred then we start questioning why we aren't all actually equal, and that leads to us removing them from power.

13

Really anything that shows or hints that any part of their "natural" order is something created. Gender is a big one but anything

10

It's a shame. I'm not trans. I'm a cis male and I have no desire to be female. But I live in a very trans friendly community and as such I have many trans friends and they need outlets. I joined a meetup group which inadvertly became a trans safe space (original topic was anime) and many trans people just joined as it was the one space where they weren't judged. We just did it in the way of anime, like their only safe space is something not trans releated and this is despite living in a friendly city. I will be an ally to all my trans friends and support them in this time of need.

17
lemmy.ml

I'm currently discussing with people about mirroring it somewhere on lemmy, but there is also Transbucket which already exists as its own independent website.

16

You... see who's in charge, right? Republicans always target LGBTQ+ folks for "pornographic" violations.

3
sh.itjust.works

I mean, ffs. #notallcishet? I don’t get how people who are being oppressed and all lumped together under one description (which you all definitely are) can be so nonchalant throwing around broad strokes like that.

-11
Dracesreply
lemmy.world

Lol was that hashtag ironic? You know "not all men" is frequently referenced as a critique about men who can't hear criticism of gender equality because "not all men"? As a cishet dude: calm down, their point is valid and your reaction is cringe

15
lemmy.world

You got a problem with trans people? No? Then it wasn't talking about you. Christ, is that hard to understand?

When a group of people makes an "us vs them" against a minority, it forces the minority to use that language back. As a cishet person, your identity is being used as a weapon to harm trans people regardless if you're doing anything. Ignorance of the minorities plight can be weaponized to do more harm and that ignorance can be shielded through appeals to normalcy and tradition.

When you respond to that language with "not all cishet people" you signal that your support is contingent on you not losing anything (your ignorance is one of the things you can lose). Which can and will be used to weaponize more harm against the minority group.

15
sh.itjust.works

I realize that I’m outnumbered here and that this is apparently an unpopular opinion, but nobody is forcing anyone to say “all x are y” because someone else is (I agree, in bad faith) doing the same thing.

You’ve both been quite rude to me and I’m done engaging you, but that’s the full extent of my point and I’m unconvinced by your rebuttals.

Ciao now 🫡

-3
lemmy.world

nobody is forcing anyone to say “all x are y” because someone else is (I agree, in bad faith) doing the same thing.

Legal documents are being made to say that all x (transgender individuals) are now y (the wrong gender) because someone else (the government) is making them say so.

8

I’ve never disputed that. I don’t know how reiterating that fact in any way supports the idea that it “forces” transgender individuals to use the same language to describe “all cishet” people.

That was my point. It always has been.

If I were visually impaired and protesting unsuccessfully for better accessibility in my work environments, I can’t imagine why I would make a claim in any capacity including the language “all sighted people”.

2
lemmy.world

Well it is genitals but the purpose is entirely different. I don’t agree with it but I can at least see the logic.

-12
Echreply
lemm.ee

By that "logic", all obgyn's are sex workers. It's shit justification for bigotry and shouldn't be given any credence whatsoever.

27
lemmy.world

Not sure I follow the logic since an OBGYNs job is not get you off.

If they are banning NSFW images, then that’s why.

Like I said the purpose of those images in the trans subreddits serve an educational purpose. But you probably shouldn’t be viewing it at work. If they are banning nudity, that’s nudity.

Like I said I don’t agree with the ban hammer, but it’s consistent. However, in my opinion, all it should be left as is regardless of the purpose.

-15
lemmy.world

since an OBGYNs job is not get you off.

Neither is trans people posting the results of surgery.

This entire line of thinking is contradictory, nonsensical and unhelpful.

13

I was replying to comment the “OBGYNs are sex workers” comment. Tran surgery pics are very useful and not porn.

If you can’t follow that logic I’m not sure what to do.

-4
lemmy.ml

Unironically devastating for Reddit financially and could see a gooner exodus to Lemmy.

151
Ethalisreply
jlai.lu

As far as I remember they weren't monetizing NSFW subs, so I guess their reasoning is that banning them reduces server costs while not impacting their ads revenue.

Now what will be interesting is to see how much of Reddit's userbase was there at least partly for the porn, and how many users will leave Reddit altogether because of this move

71

I'm curious if the pro bono porn increased the traffic for the monetizes subreddits. So this might lead to a gross loss instead of pure savings from the server costs.

Anyhow. R/all is among the worse places on the internet. It can get fucked.

1
Raiderkevreply
lemmy.world

Man, like I'll welcome new people, but I don't want all flooded with porn. I already had to block a bunch of communities/ profiles, and I'll have to work more to fix my feed. Having said that

Give me your tired, your goons, Your huddled masses yearning to goon free, I guess.

25
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Try jerboa, you can just block the nsfw instance instead of doing it piecemeal. Total game changer. (Some of the other apps probably have this functionality but I don't know which.)

16
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I didn't want other NSFW stuff blocked, just porn. When I was originally signing up it seemed like NSFW was being treated as an all or nothing for most instances. Idk if it's changed or if I just needed to look harder.

3
lemmy.ml

What's an example of NSFW that you want to see that is banned by instances banning porn? Which instances are you referring to?

4
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Idk it was like 2 years ago. I just remember looking through fediverse guides and instances were labeled as either allowing NSFW content or not, no nuance. I didn't dig into whether the specific instances were defederated from lemmynsfw nor did I even know to look for that at the time.

There's not that much NSFW stuff that isn't porn but I come across it occasionally. Usually jokes, sometimes people will also be very cautious and mark shit that isn't really. I prefer to be largely unconstrained with what comes across my feed, just don't care for the random puss intermingled.

1

I think when people talk about an instance allowing NSFW or not they mean pornographic content.

1
Raiderkevreply
lemmy.world

I do this in sync as it is. Just saying if a shitload of reddit refugees come here and my feed becomes 90% full of porn, I'll likely have a few more to ban.

1
lemmy.dbzer0.com

As far as I can tell, you can only block communities in sync which is why you're having to do it one by one. Jerboa you can just block the whole NSFW instance, one and done.

1

I can block instances. It's really not that big of a deal. Just pointing out that an influx like that, I'm sure would bring more instances, and more stuff I wouldn't want in my feed I'd have to block.

1

We will be a melting pot where goon and righteous will mingle in the everlasting hope of prosperity and freedom… for all.

4

I'm not an admin or anything, but there was a recent meta post about this topic. A lot of NSFW and political stuff is restricted but not blocked. All that means is that it won't show in any feed unless you actually subscribe to the community. If you subscribe it will show in the all-feed like normal. I think it's a good middle ground.

2
sh.itjust.works

I'm against the ban, but I also don't want that gooning here. Although that's what drives like half of the internet so maybe it's a good thing for the fediverse.

16

pretty much just lemmynsfw, and nsfw can easily be turned off here

42
lemmy.ml

It'll be constrained to pro-gooning instances, most seem to be defederated from porn but the influx of users in general will spill over to the non-gooning instances.

31
Wxnzxnreply
lemmy.ml

Like - a lot of Reddit users seemed to have accounts specifically to interact with porn, I think that transfers well into the Fediverse, you just get your porn account on an instance that is federated with the porn ones.

21

Yep, and that will have spillover. There isn't going to be an increase in porn on non-porn instances, but the growth of porn instances will increase general users, though not at a 1 to 1 rate.

15

That's how mine works, and I use different apps to browse porn so those apps are logged into the correct account always.

7
bricklovereply
midwest.social

Many technologies lived and died based on what the gooners chose, e.g. VHS vs betamax. I welcome them

6

Betamax was used by climbers^1 , clearly everyone went with vhs to avoid them.
^1 a recomended sequence of moves is called a beta to this day

1
lemmy.ml

Remember when tumblr got rid of porn and everyone stopped using it.

143

Worst case you bail for a different instance, ideally one that doesn't defederate if your goal is not to have content blocked from you.

4
lemmy.world

With Mark Blue flowers and Steven Davis? Wait! Its coming back to me!

Kevin Rose and the other guy who was chunky!

3
lemmy.world

Dont they have to wait like 2 weeks tho to post images or is that just some instances

1
JackbyDevreply
programming.dev

I wonder if we'll see enough users for interactive communities to take off. I'm into literate erotic roleplay (basically cowriting smut), but there's never been enough folks on the fediverse for me to try to get into it.

1

I don't see why not. I enjoy a little realism in them. I've looked up fine dining etiquette and how film development work for them.

2
sopuli.xyz

This has been predicted for many years. Most were expecting it to happen before the IPO, since investors are afraid of porn.

They had also been gradually heading down this path for a long time, making porn harder and harder (heh) to find and view.

89
Michalreply
programming.dev

It's not only porn. Today i google-image searched a skin condition. Most results were reddit links, but i wasn't able to open any of them without their app as the subreddits were apparently 18+!

I wasn't able to view any of the information as i refuse to install the app. Google should deprioritize the results that can't be viewed in the browser.

29
frosty99creply
midwest.social

You should still be able to navigate to those posts by changing the link to old.reddit.com. But I assume that will go away at some point too.

27

In the top right of your internet browser, there should be a menu button. If you hit that, there should be a "Desktop Site" button. If you check that, the app prompt goes away. It's annoying that it's required, but at least you won't be locked out

1

It's only a matter of time. They don't display any ads on nsfw subreddits currently, so management likely sees these subreddits as nothing but a cost, especially because they tend to be heavily image/gif based. what they are unsure about, which is why they haven't been purged yet, is likely how much traffic to non-nsfw subreddits nsfw subreddits drive. I think we are likely to see purges of them when/if ad money dips or plateaus and they turn their eye to minimizing operating costs.

9

Are they going to revert the changes in a few weeks when Musk loses interest? Seems like a huge loss of website traffic for some Elon virtue signaling.

4

It did happen before the IPO. It's been happening for several years. They have not been doing mass bans all at once. They've been surreptitiously taking down subreddits over the years. Mostly smaller ones that woujldn't draw much attetnion. Looks like they went for the bigger targets now.

This isn't a sudden change to ideologically align with the current US administration either. They have been at this for a long time.

3
sh.itjust.works

The subs are back up for the record. According to an admin, it was a glitch.

64
almost1337reply
lemm.ee

The glitch being they got caught and people complained

49
almost1337reply
lemm.ee

I mean, one has to ask why they were setting up automated banning of these subreddits in the first place.

29
iAmTheTotreply
sh.itjust.works

The reason for all of them was unmoderated. So it seems to me like they have/are testing a method to auto ban unmoderated subs. Not that crazy, imho.

3
Clasmreply
lemmy.world

Then why weren't there loads more "unmoderated" subs of different categorize blocked?

If it was just a glitch, I suspect that the affected subreddits would better represent a random distribution of topics than what we witnessed.

15
iAmTheTotreply
sh.itjust.works

A glitch is when something doesn't work as you expect it to. I don't know why you'd suspect any kind of behaviour from a glitch. Glitches can do all kinds of crazy shit.

To be clear, I'm speculating on what tool they may actually be working on.

2

I'm aware of what a glitch is. What I'm saying is that they are already targeting these specific subs regardless of their moderation status. The only 'glitch' here was that they got caught pushing an agenda.

6
Jomnreply
jlai.lu

If they are really testing things like that, it's quite worrying that they did it on the production server...

9
iAmTheTotreply
sh.itjust.works

Hence the glitch. A glitch is when doesn't perform as expected or desired.

1

I see, I assumed trans_surgeries wasn't a nsfw sub, so I was weary of why it would be in the list with the rest.

2

😂 like that Facebook "glitch" that banned any inclusive terms and force-followed Trump on people's profiles? Lol these fuckers

37
lemmy.ml

I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out they're making a ban list for all these communities, but the 'glitch' was that someone turned it on before whatever PR move/manufactured scandal they were going to use to justify it was ready to go.

Or this was just a test fire to see how people would react.

22

That's a pretty big glitch. 1. You have a nuclear button. 2. The omega thermal nuclear cluster bombs are pointed at a particular target

11

Lmao, somebody said to do it and got called on the carpet by their shareholders.

5
lemmy.world

Reddit is preparing to surrender to somebody who does not want NSFW content on their site in an attempt to appease advertisers. Possibly Musk.

57

The anti-porn conservatives have always been about controlling women.

That woman who founded OnlyFans driving around in 10 different Lamborghinis, that's their worst fucking nightmare.

Before that, it was that one lady whose husband died and then she discovered massive oil reserves under her land.

That kind of stuff is an existential threat to the patriarchy, which conservative control freaks must preserve at any cost.

They cannot allow women to become self-sufficient and thereby self-determinative. Otherwise, who will take care of the men, and raise the men's babies?

43

Literally why witch hunts existed. It was just a way for authorities to expropriate the wealth of some random dowager who won't remarry (and therefore automatically cede all property to her new husband).

24

Also, frankly, I think sexual repression is just a HUGE part of the control mechanisms these people employ. Basically, "joy" is seen as a "sin" because there should "only be joy in God" or some stupid bull shit. You are supposed to take bride in being as missrable as possible so in the afterlife you will get eternal joy or whatever.

9
lemmy.ml

Could be going for IPO finally.

Edit: didn't realize it already happened, I haven't been on Reddit in a long while.

6
reddthat.com

I don't care about NSFW subs per se, but they're useful canaries in the coal mine. If they're gone gone, it's a fine indicator of what's about to come next.

48

No, your canaries are already long dead. It's long been a process when Reddit admins don't want a sub to exist but it isn't actually breaking any rules to laser focus on the moderators, ban them the moment they have an excuse, immediately ban the sub for being unmoderated, refuse to give it to a new mod via reddit request and ban any replacement subs for recreating a banned sub. Hell, r/GamingCircleJerk has been laughing about some right wing gaming memes sub having that done to it just a few weeks ago.

They only care about it not looking like they are just nuking subs they don't like is because they don't want to scare off other users who might get antsy about having a community under those sorts of capricious admins.

This sounds a lot like an automation of that process that misfired. That they were all specifically banned for being "unmoderated" is what jumps out to me as telling.

4

Normies will still use it, despite that it will be filled mostly with AI content in near future.

15

Spez: "Daddy Elon wants me to get rid of all the twitter critical and trans related subs. How can I do it without it being too obvious?"

Snoo Lackey: "Easy. What we'll do is ban a load of morally grey subs like porn and drug related ones along with the twitter critical and trans ones. Then, when the predictable uproar kicks off, we'll wait awhile then announce it was all a terrible mistake and we'll reactivate all the porn ones. We just won't reactivate the twitter critical or trans ones. Because lets be honest - no one really cares and as long as the simpletons have their wank bank back, they'll neither notice nor care either!"

Spez: "Brilliant!"

38

Good theory, but it looks like they all came back including the transgender related subs.

6

First they came for the NSFW, and I did not speak out—because I was not NSFW.

35
feddit.org

OK but how the FUCK did r/forcedcreampie survive the purge?

34
Tuxmanreply
sh.itjust.works

Under the New Founding Fathers, forced cream pies are ok, willing abortions are not.

52

Oh that's the most vile and gut wrenchingly nauseating comment i read all year. Well done and well said.

7

Porn is made by actors who sometimes roleplay scenes that aren't actually real.

6
delgatoreply
sh.itjust.works

Same, when I was a teenager it was Erowid for all my questions, then r/drugs in college. I also loved r/tooktoomuch, which had the best life lessons to offer.

17

havent heard of 'Erowid' in a minute. Great memories back then, simpler times

5
lemmy.ca

Is erowid still good? I have it enshrined in the back of my head as the place for plant info

3

Erowid is still good, though I wish there was a little more info about current operations and projects outside of maintaining the experience report database. As far as I can tell, both Erowid Monthly and Erowid Extracts are dead, Ask Erowid is dead, DrugsData is not currently receiving samples, etc.

There's reason to play some stuff close to the chest, obviously, but there used to be more activity than just the experience database, and it's sad to see the other functions languish. But as a repository of drug information it's still pretty great.

A newer good harm reduction/info site is tripsit.me, which also has a trip sit via chat service. Can't speak to the quality of the chat service, over something like the Fireside Project which has been around for a while now, but the infosheets on tripsit are pretty good.

Edit: Ugh, going through the other Erowid sections again...beginning to think I need to step up and see if they want more volunteers. Lots of dead links where Wayback can probably help a ton, the Character vault can probably be expanded quite a bit, etc. But this all might just be the focus moving on a bit. I just wanted to see Ralph Metzner's blog, since you hear so much about Tim Leary and Ram Dass but Metzner was right there with 'em.

4

That's so sad. It was not a sub to sell anything but to help and comfort those who need it in this space.

2
Amju Wolfreply
pawb.social

To be fair I don't think that many people go to Reddit for porn. With Tumblr it seemed almost exclusive. But it's still an odd move.

2
feddit.uk

Porn on Reddit used to be good but has been awful since the rise of OnlyFans. Now almost every post on porn subreddits is someone shilling their onlyfans using the same 5 second tease clips across dozens of tenuously related subreddits. If the exodus happens to Lemmy, that is what it will be here.

OF killed good amateur porn

Edit: Boobs is banned because it was unmoderated apparently. i haven't checked the others in the OPs list. i've logged into my porn account and there's plenty of large and small porn subreddits still around so i don't think this was a porn purge

13
Wxnzxnreply
lemmy.ml

OF killed good amateur porn

As I have seen it pointed out, it's not just that, although it is a huge part of it. Another, sadly, is that there was so much uncontrolled porn floating around the internet, much of it was pretty fucked up - involuntarily filmed and/or published without consent, not traceable, even with very unclear ages, etc., etc.

So as a secondary effect, that I think is highly positive, most sites also just don't allow for non-verified content, or at least are much better at removing anything remotely suspicious. That leaves the OF stuff as the main non-studio-produced source, as it allows for easy, professional verifications.

4
feddit.uk

it was at the time i wrote that comment (hence the screenshot). Reddit since came out and said there was an error. most of the banned subreddits are now back up

2

Fair enough, and reddit might ban nsfw again, so your reply was/is quite warranted.

1
lemmy.world

Yeah this worked out great for OnlyFans, Tumblr, and Flickr. At least OnlyFans was smart enough to remember which side their bread was buttered on.

30
lemm.ee

the tumblr one is so funny because yahoo promised not to screw it up and then they did

12
lemmy.world

And now there's still tons of NSFW content, they just started labeling it as NSFT (not safe for Tumblr) to get around the auto censors

9

My experience is that modern NSFW on tumblr is just porn bots. You used to get really nice, high quality slutty art for whatever TV show or movie character tripped your trigger. Now they have an Ai bot that's trained itself to flag black and white sfw sketches but not straight up literal tiddy drop videos with spam links below them.

7
lemmy.ml

What would be left if onlyfans got rid of porn? Wtf. I'm not paying to watch someone fix rust on their car.

3

I think that was temporary and something to do eith their parent company or payment processor and not a real policy change, but I may be misremembering.

1
lemmy.ml

If LLMs were actually intelligent they would have done it to all of reddit

3

That's what it looks like. There are a lot of NSFW subs that didn't get banned, and some that got banned that weren't NSFW like /r/narcissisticabuse. All marked as for "being unmoderated". If they were actually banning NSFW subs, you'd think they'd say so.

16
lemmy.ca

I welcome all the porn y'all want to post ....

26

this was literally why i still kinda used reddit. welp hello lemmynsfw!

25
r.EndTimesreply
lemm.ee

thank god all the niche fd up ones that make me question why reddit is public are still there

9

My guess is that they’re expecting some new federal anti-porn legislation and are prepping for that. Porn is already basically outlawed in much of the south, (if not explicitly, then implicitly due to how many hoops porn makers need to jump through), and republicans have made it clear that they want to bring conservative policies at the federal level so liberal states can’t overrule them.

23

Just a reminder that pornhub is a Canadian site and is not subject to the US's increasingly stupid rules.

1
lemmy.world

No porn = more horny people = more births

No abortion = more births

The logic driving US legislation everyone, it's not so much "protect the children" thinking as "make the children have children" thinking.

Honestly, they've guaranteed that the US therapy industry is going to have patients for decades to come!

20
drcabbagereply
lemmy.ml

No abortions can equal less births. Women aren't going to want to take the risk of getting pregnant if there isn't a safety net if things go wrong.

7

You might want to crack a sex education reader with special attention to possibilities of error.

Unfortunately, young and uninformed people will keep falling in love and getting tingly about it.

5

What do you mean no safety net? They just live with and serve their husbands. He is the safety net.

/s

1

As with anything thiose Nazi does if therapy still exist when they are done with the health sector it will be to make sure the child are well brainwashed after the education camp ( or whatever will replace education in most red state )

4

I don't think this is really tinfoil hat. I'd like to see they explain how it just happened to remove that subset and not other things.

9

You mean all my reddit porn is now gone?

Fuck it. They all should migrate to Lemmy. There was some hard to find porn that I haven't saved yet...

19
sh.itjust.works

Good news to me. I can watch reddit and twitter self destruct from the comfort of the Fediverse. Welcome home, fellow refugees.

18
khaleerreply
sopuli.xyz

They would rather hop into another corpo boat instead of choosing an instance.

1
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I sure am grateful for how easy it is to avoid porn on lemmy, may that continue to be the case with the certain upcoming influx of it.

17
crt0oreply

It's segregated to lemmynsfw.com, which most instances don't federate with

18
Derpgonreply
programming.dev

Since when is drinking rum, singing sea shanties, and downloading content hidden behind a monthly subscription in 4k illegal?

26
lemmy.ml

Just following in Tumblr's footsteps. They have to sanitize it to fully monetize it.

12

Reddit is run by big business and greedy corporate America. When it went public for the stock price to make even more money then it did before, I left that place.

12

Couldn't have happened to a scummier hive of villainy. I wil unironically applaud every bad thing that happens to the site.

Nothing of value lost, there are uncountable alternatives.

11
lemmy.ca

Imagine all these OF models with their bots posting all over NSFW communities, it will be dead! How they will promote? Lol

If all this people go over Lemmynsfw, it won't handle all of this, that's why more NSFW instances should be maid IMO.

8
lemmy.world

Monkey’s paw has granted your wish, 53 new nsfw communities based on maids will now be founded.

12
lemmy.world

It doesn't look like all the NSFW subs are banned yet, but it wouldn't surprise me if that happens soon.

8

Looks like maybe they're starting with the main ones‽

2

Hmm, maybe they reverted? Everything still seems accessible right now

Edit: the ones on the screen seem down but there are definitely still some nsfw subreddits still open. Either the purgening has just begun or those fit some kind of criteria for a ban.

8

Terrible choice caving into the pseudo-moralists, but they've been going down a bad path for a long time. They should've looked at the cautionary tale of Tumblr before committing this own goal. Making sweeping changes to fit in with corporate agendas may be popular among their own class, but it also has the longer-term effect of sacrificing the user base. And they've been hemorrhaging for a while anyway. Where do they think their future profits will come from?

8

According to a post from our Admin, in the small instance I'm in there has been a sudden influx of new users (about 200) in the last day or so (as new users have to be approved, somebody is getting cramps on their approve finger).

(Guess Anarchism and Piracy could technically count as NSFW in most workplaces, especially the latter)

6

Reason is always “unmoderated” despite some of the banned subreddits being fully moderated.

Well, that's a lie, because /r/programming still has mods. Pretty sure they did nothing in the last 10 years. I guess it's because the sub wasn't NSFW, I guess.

5

They have been coming back. /drugs being one that is back. Don't know wtf happened, but glad I'm here.

5

that's funny because I was banned for saying fireworks in Brampton Ontario

3
Amju Wolfreply
pawb.social

It's funny because I watch zero NSFW content on Reddit or Lemmy.

::: spoiler Spoiler Have way better sources for that, you know 😏 :::

4

it really is funny. furries have the best image board for the worst content. (or not, depending on how you see it i suppose)

furries stay winning, what can i say.

2
pawb.social

The only thing I use Reddit for is porn, and my feed isn't empty, so either they're doing this in stages or there's some other criteria they're using beyond just being NSFW.

1
Derpgonreply
programming.dev

Many of these subreddits were not straight up porn. But then again, it is Reddit, should nuke the site altogether.

2

A bug? You mean someone in the office accidentially pressed the big red 'purge-everything-unholy-for-when-the-evangelicals-come-after-us' button?

21

Seem to have a big wave of shill and bot ( and private scam DM ) all with Nickname with a leaf emoji at the end to the point where i auto block every name i see with them

5
sh.itjust.works

A Reddit comment on a trans community on my feed. That’s all I remember man, didn’t think about it twice to be honest.

1

Seems you're right. I tried a few subs when the original comment was posted and they didn't work but now they seem to be back.

To be fair, it's still a good thing to remember that it takes like one press of a button to kill a shitton of communities a lot of people care about.

1