Spyke

Yep. The only pushback is from the countries he wants to cleanse them into or the people themselves he wants cleansed. It's self preservation.

The left strongly disapprove, but that's it enough for a backlash. The leftists think Biden was just as bad and the right and diet-right voters don't care or are happily on board.

3
lemmy.world

I guess all the “Genocide Joe” commenters aren’t getting paid to skew the election anymore, so they won’t be here to comment.

94
samus12345reply
lemm.ee

I haven't seen "Genocide Don" yet. Funny that.

48
P00ptartreply
lemmy.world

Isn't Trump's middle name James? Genocide James works. And you could Photoshop him trying to look cool, like dark Brandon. But obviously just sad like some 60 year old trying to look cool at the barbeque and failing miserably, but even worse because he's older... And trump.

3

It's John (which also happens to be a pseudonym he's used). You could say "Genocide John," but nobody would know who you're talking about.

3

That's because Trump only just got in and hasn't (yet) done anything close to what Biden did in terms of genocide

0

There are a few stragglers around still. And just as sanctimonious with their tiresome and reckless high-flying rhetoric about how principled they are....

sigh.

15
lemm.ee

Bro did you see that articicle about the x whistleblower and how elon influenced the election

15

Or, and this is crazy, Biden could have earned more votes for the DNC by using the Leahy Law and requiring Israel to stop committing war crimes if they wanted to continue to receive military aid.

Almost like it's the responsibility of parties and politicians to earn votes in a democratic system. Not the duty of voters to vote for the "correct" party, which is what you see codified in Authoritarian governments. The writers of our Constitution specifically said the reason for having elections so often was to make sure politicians were responsible to the people, not the other way around.

So the more you try to blame the voters, the more you make them not want to vote blue.

3

Hi I am here. I called Biden "Genocide Joe" because frankly that is an accurate label.

I am here commenting that I already have and will continue to shit on Trump for being a genocidal bigot.

Now can you proceed to take your foot out of your mouth?

0

I'm right here. Trump is gearing up to act as genocidal as Biden was but he's not there yet

0
lemmy.ml

I'm here. Biden is a genocidal monster, and nothing Trump can do will change that fact.

-26
AbidanYrereply
lemmy.world

.ml user with a braindead take? yeah, that checks out.

18
Icemanreply
lemmy.world

So you don't think Biden was complicit in the genocide? The one he funded?

8
lemmy.world

The fact that you place the entire weight of 80 years of US Israeli policy on its most reluctant participant demonstrates your agenda. If Trump was in office on Oct. 7, there would be no palestinian territories anymore. They'd be under the Israeli flag and stained with the blood of American soldiers.

12

The fact that you place the entire weight of 80 years of US Israeli policy

No, I just place the weight of the Commander in Chief refusing to abide by US law, and ending arms shipments to a genocidal rouge nuclear state, and preventing the UN from holding the genocidal rogue nuclear state to account.

6

The fact that you place the entire weight of 80 years of US Israeli policy on its most reluctant participant

Biden was not reluctant in the slightest and neither are you.

5
Count042reply
lemmy.ml

So much for the rational bit of your username.

Though, I guess you can be rational and wrong if you start from false premises.

Biden, and any other American president, can end Israeli wars with a single phone call.

Reagan did it.

Bush did it.

Clinton did it.

In fact, the Israeli military systematically doesn't know how to end wars because they've never had to do it. America has always ended their wars.

It's literally an aspect of their political ideology:

'Oh our party can't be blamed for the war goals not being accomplished. We had to stop because America'

You're either so horrifically ignorant of recent history (my still living father is older than the state of Israel) that any opinion you spout can be tossed out (no matter how rational), or you know this and are trying to actively provide cover for a president who was happy with the slaughter of mostly children.

Which is it?

Edit: and to be exact, it's 77 years. And the US wasn't exactly friendly at the start due to the perceived communist sympathies of the young state. You know, the whole cold war thing? You may have heard of it?

2
lemmy.world

Reagan started the 3 billion in military aid to Israel and the other two you mentioned continued it. And this is the very thing Biden is criticized for.

You say they ended wars with phone calls, without specifically saying what you're referring to. But I can guess the following two things are true of Reagan, Bush, and Clinton: 1) they weren't dealing with Netanyahu, and 2) they weren't dealing with Hamas. Netanyahu was clearly not interested in ending the war until his buddy Trump was president, so there never was an option to bring "peace with a phone call". Biden held back weapons to Israel, taking flak from how own party to do so - did any of his predecessors?

I'm not here to say Biden did enough, but you guys and the pro Israel side have something in common - you have a particular hate for Biden.

-1

...

Really?

That is your response?

https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=Reagan+Israel+war

There is nothing rational about you. It's impossible to be rational with absolutely no historical knowledge.

It doesn't matter who the leader of Israel is. Israel isn't a real country. It doesn't exist without continuous US funding. In fact, a third of ALL U.S. foreign aid has gone to Israel. Without free cash from the US, Israel goes bankrupt. Without free weapons from America, Israel goes bankrupt.

Any American president, at any time, can end any Israeli war with a phone call. That is, in fact, how all Israeli wars have ended. It's actually hurt Israel because they don't know how to set achievable war goals. Instead their wars end when America demands they do.

This is also the same deal Hamas had accepted since may. You mention them like they have been an impediment to the peace negotiations.

Biden held back one shipment of 2,000 lb bombs. A weapon that our military doctrine doesn't allow us to use near population centers due to the likelihood of civilian casualties, and Israel wanted to drop them in one of the most densely populated places on earth.

Note that I said one shipment. We did provide them other shipments of 2000 lb. The only reason he held up that one shipment was to earn the respect of the utterly, foolishly gullible. Of course, he was required by the Leahy Law to stop all shipments to Israel.

Assuming good faith, which is a stretch at this point, you are utterly and completely ignorant of this topic.

Yeah, I have a hate-on for any worthless fucks that commit genocide. And when you have the power to end it, and don't, then you are responsible for it.

Now, before you complain about me not providing links, spend 5 seconds trying to educate yourself by using Google. I'm not going to provide links proving the sky is blue, either. Some things you are responsible for finding out yourself.

0

If Trump was in office on Oct. 7

But he wasn't, Biden was, and Biden made the choice to back Israel in its genocide to the hilt.

1
lemmy.ml

Yeah, you can't get away with critising Dear Leader Biden on .world

-14
Rhoerireply
lemmy.world

And yet, here you are doing just that.

Now, let’s all take a moment and quietly imagine what would happen if someone should go to .ml and call out Putin for being a sad little coward that can’t take criticism without windowing someone to death…

15
ubergeekreply
lemmy.today

call out Putin for being a sad little coward that can’t take criticism without windowing someone to death…

I do not think that would be an issue. Its not like Putin is even pretending to be a leftist, nor has he ever.

3
Rhoerireply
lemmy.world

Seriously? The admin there refuses to answer when asked if they support Russia. And check the modlogs. They hand out vague “rule 1” violations that are critical of communism sometimes several times a day.

.ml isn’t just a safe haven for leftist trolls.

2

are critical of communism sometimes several times a day.

Criticizing communism isn't criticizing Putin, who is not a communist.

I've had posts criticizing capitalism be removed from .world... So, obviously, they hate the US, right?

6
ubergeekreply
lemmy.today

Still not hearing any trump criticism from ya…

Criticize him for supporting a genocide in Israel? Last I heard from the neoliberals, that's just a practical necessity, and we cannot blame Trump for 77 years of US-Israeli policy...

4
lemmy.ml

And I'm not hearing any criticism of Putin, Leobold II, Pol Pot, or Charles Manson from you. What's you point?

2

removed, you were the one who made the bad faith argument first. Don't like your own medicine?

2
Machinistreply
lemmy.world

Woah. What's it called when you can't tell sarcasm and serious apart? Godwinned?

The .ml troll that got banned, are they serious or are they playing? That went 0 to nazi in the fewest steps I think I've ever seen.

0

Your removed post at the same level in this chain. You called the guy you were slapfighting with a nazi and there was a Hitler comparison as well.

I can't tell if you actually believe that, are just trolling, or are muddying the waters to control the narrative.

0

"hmm, funny how all the people criticizing genocide Joe disappeared"

"No we didn't, are right here"

"Blocked"

1
Grimyreply
lemmy.world

I only started using the term after the election, I wish I was paid. It's crazy how I'm expected to shut up about it for the next 4 years. Apparently, asking the dems to change their stance on genocide of everything is too much and everyone would rather stick their head in the sand. The moment someone enables it just a bit more then them, they get none of the blame and we get to wait through 4 years of shit just for them to give us literally the same stance.

Both parties enable it and are complicit. Defending either on the subject is clear bootlicking imo.

-31
lemmy.ca

It's not just that he's much worse it's that some people somehow expected him to be better?!?

23
ubergeekreply
lemmy.today

I don't think anyone realistically thought he'd be "better", unless you count the scum who consider "More dying" to be "better".

4
lemmy.ca

I've seen multiple videos of people walking around interviewing people that voted for him and asking why. Lots of them stated that Biden arming Israel against Gaza was a major concern for them. None of the interviewers dug into what they hoped would change but it was clear they expected Trump to improve the situation for the people of Gaza. Now I've got no idea why they thought that - I certainly never saw anything to make me think that - but lots of people seemed have got that message.

0
lemmy.world

Not only that, but if you took them at their word, that donvict and Kamala would have been the eXaCtSaMe on Gaza, then that issue is cancelled out and you have to weigh all the other policy positions, and even then, it is clear that donvict is a TERRIBLE choice compared to Kamala.

They have no excuse. None.

12
ubergeekreply
lemmy.today

Not only that, but if you took them at their word, that donvict and Kamala would have been the eXaCtSaMe on Gaza, then that issue is cancelled out

Not true.

You can refuse to support both of them because they are both evil, and you morally should not support evil. Even if one evil person will put more money in your pocket, or if one person will smile at you while your rights are being eroded while telling you nothing is wrong.

4
lolcatnipreply
reddthat.com

This is like choosing to do nothing in the trolley problem because you disagree with the notion of taking part in something that will kill people. Congratulations on keeping your hands clean while failing to prevent avoidable deaths. I hope your sense of moral vanity is satisfied.

-1
ubergeekreply
lemmy.today

This is like choosing to do nothing in the trolley problem because you disagree with the notion of taking part in something that will kill people.

Nah, it's rejecting the entire scenario as being made up. Why not fucking stop the trolley?!?!? Its our foot on the throttle making it run people over!!

2

You "rejected the scenario" but didn't actually stop the trolley, and now it's crushing people. Brilliant fucking job there with your out of the box thinking!

1

Here's my excuse: I'm not American, and I'm not going to refrain from criticising a genocidal monster just because Americans treat their political parties like sportsteams.

1
Grimyreply
lemmy.world

His comment implies anyone speaking disfavorably about the dems stance on genocide is somehow a paid shill.

Read the rest of the comments. It's always the same thing. The dems lost because the voters got manipulated into thinking genocide was something to draw a line over. Well it fucking was. I still think not voting and voting for Trump of all people is massively stupid but I hate the message we are sending.

Trump isn't worse, he's the same on it. We shouldn't be calling them anything other then Genocide Joe and Genocide Trump. Biden did a lot of good but his whole legacy is not breaking with genocide.

We have 4 years to exert pressure and make sure the next candidate isn't a mossad and wallstreet plant. Instead we are infighting like peasants and trying are hardest to not hold the politicians who are suppose to represent us accountable.

-19
lemmy.world

Biden did a lot of good but his whole legacy is not breaking with genocide.

Now Trump has already undone most of that good, has 4 more years to cause damage, and the genocide that you "drew a line over" hasn't stopped. Nice job.

28
Grimyreply
lemmy.world

I voted strategically but I shouldnt have to do it while gritting my teeth. They offered nothing because they thought they had an easy win. If we keep pointing at scapegoats and refuse to lay the blame with the ones actually in charge, we get the same exact choice in 4 years and we will lose again.

Ya, drawing the line was dumb but so is blaming the ones that drew it instead of the driver that's sending a train straight into a group of children.

-3
lemmy.world

They offered nothing because they thought they had an easy win.

Remember, nothing was...

A woman's bodily autonomy. A Trans person's right to comfort in their body. The separation between church and state. A birthright citizens right to live in their country. An employee's right to a safe job.

And so much more... And it's only been 7 days. Fuck anyone who said the Dems brought nothing to the table. You ignored what they were fighting to keep a hold of in order to parrot some bullshit Russian disinfo false equivalency about a genocide being committed by a different fucking leader in a different fucking country.

16

A woman’s bodily autonomy. A Trans person’s right to comfort in their body. The separation between church and state. A birthright citizens right to live in their country. An employee’s right to a safe job.

Hate to break it to you, but we were losing ground on all of that, even with Biden as POTUS. Hell, a fair chunk of that happened when Biden was POTUS, and Dems had a majority in the house and senate.

And yes, don't talk to me "But Manchin/Sinema!!!"... Fuck off. Because if they were so bad, why were the dems funding those campaigns? Where was the party leaders, demanding their people get on the line, or else lose committee seats, lose money, etc etc.

And why didn't the Dems drop the filibuster from the senate rules packages? Simple majority vote for everything.

Its almost like they pretended to want to do things to better the working class conditions, without actually doing anything, in order to provide a constant feed of campaign talking points to run on.

4

You ignored what they were fighting to keep a hold of in order to parrot some bullshit Russian disinfo false equivalency about a genocide being committed by a different fucking leader in a different fucking country.

I would find the lesser evil argument more convincing if the people advocating it didn't always turn out to be genocide denying conspiracy theorists who will ignore reality to defend unspeakable acts

Seems like you're not actually capable of pragmatically choosing the lesser evil while still condeming it. Seems like you always end up defending evil.

2

Why are you ignoring all the funds and arms sent to this entire different country? Do you think all that military aid is Russian disinfo?

-10

they didnt offer nothing but it was ridiculous to parade around with Liz Cheney - possibly the least popular politician in the US. I can only think they were trying to get Trump elected

2
lemmy.world

I hope you're right about four years because that's a return to normalcy that I can barely imagine right now

14
Nunarreply
lemmy.world

Trump immediately authorized 2000 lb bombs for Israel. That wasn't a thing before. He's worse and you suck for enabling him.

8

Biden authorized sending 2000lb bombs.

Then it came out that such bombs were being sent and under pressure he paused the sending of those bombs.

Trump resumed it.

You're whitewashing Biden's part in the willful mass murder of civilians (the US Military itself refuses to use 2000lb bombs exactly because of their massive collateral damage and Israel was using them in an urban area thus maximizing the killing from said collateral damage) for political point scoring.

While you're claiming the other poster "sucks" for being critical of Biden's stance on this you might want to look at yourself in a mirror.

6

I mean one 2000 lbs bomb, or 2 1000 lbs bombs... The result is the same: A genocide.

3

I do not know how to explain to Blue MAGA that symbolic gestures do not matter more than the actual material effect on Gaza.

1

The paid shills were running a con. If you weren't on payroll, then you're the mark.

Seeing how most of the conmen have cut and run now that the job is done, it really only leaves one option for you.

0
lemmy.world

His comment implies anyone speaking disfavorably about the dems stance on genocide is somehow a paid shill.

We're easy to dismiss that way. Then they don't have to think about how monstrous they have been to support genocide all this time.

0
lemmy.world

She was the only viable option other than trump, as pro-genocide centrists were so fond of gloating. I voted for her. You gonna gloat that I voted for your genocide now?

3
lemmy.world

There are a disturbing number of people in this thread who feel that condemning Democrats is more important than worrying about what is about to happen to Palestinians.

As if you folks were using genocide as a tool. And it's pretty hard to read.

11
Grimyreply
lemmy.world

When you dismiss people condemning the democrats, you essentially send the message that enabling genocide is okay.

I see attacking the voters as a zionist dog whistle, to desensitize on the subject and low key make genocide something that can be overlooked for the "right" reasons.

Insulting to be said I'm using it as a tool. Every thread about it, there's multiple comments talking about the voters and using them as a scapegoat. I'm just responding to them. If I'm using it as a tool, so are you. And you are a lot more vocal about it then me.

1
lemmy.world

I am dismissing people continuing to talk about the election when it's over as if it matters when people are fucking dying.

But you don't care because American politics.

1
Grimyreply
lemmy.world

Seems like you're dismissing only the people responding to the behavior negatively and not the ones actually doing the behavior. I find it convenient that you are constantly silent on the genocide in general. I only see you commenting when it comes to pointing the finger at scapegoats. It's easy to notice with the amount you post (not an insult, just an observation, I don't mind high engagement).

It doesn't seem like you are arguing in good faith, since you accuse me of something I'm clearly trying to curtail.

Yes it's annoying when every thread about the genocide has people screaming at the top of their lungs trying to blame voters.

I have more to say on the subject but I was too harsh and got my comment removed so I will leave it at that.

3
lemmy.world

No, I'm dismissing anyone who doesn't give enough of a shit about Palestinians to bother talking to them.

How often have you done it?

1

Feeling empathy for a population isn't contigent on direct communication with them. Pure rhetoric. But to answer your question, I have a good friend who's Palestinian. He's been here for many years but it was still brutal to see how it affected him. So yes, I've talked to them.

You are also dismissing only the people that don't align with your beliefs. You are clearly only pushing one side, the one that makes light of the genocide and seeks to divert attention to anyone who isn't Biden and by extent Israel, and it's easy to assume why.

1
ubergeekreply
lemmy.today

I am dismissing people continuing to talk about the election when it’s over as if it matters when people are fucking dying.

Did it matter 30 days ago to you? If so, why do you support the person wanting to continue it, and blame voters for not wanting either of the genociders?

1

Of course it mattered to me 30 days ago. It mattered to me when this genocide started which is why I have been doing everything in my very limited powers to stop it. What have you done?

1
ubergeekreply
lemmy.today

condemning Democrats is more important than worrying about what is about to happen to Palestinians.

Well, if we want to take it this way...

Yes, Trump's open declaration of supporting a genocide in Palestine is just as bad as when Biden did it. They are both fucking ghouls, and I hope they both join Kissinger, Reagan, and Thatcher soon.

0

I don't give a shit about Trump or Biden. I give a shit about Palestinians. And I have asked multiple people in this thread when they have ever asked a Palestinian what their needs are. You know how many people have told me when they did that? I'll give you a hint: it's less than one.

How about you?

2
lemmy.world

Where did I make it about me?

When are you going to give more of a shit about Palestinians than American politics?

4
lemmy.world

And there it is: fuck Palestinians. They don't matter.

Which is what I was saying about all of this arguing over American politics.

2
Maggotyreply
lemmy.world

This is the top of this comment thread (link). And it's been like this for 3 months in any content section about Palestinians. It really seems like the big push is to absolve the DNC for it's support of Netanyahu. Elsewhere in this thread they try to characterize Biden's complete support and mirroring of IDF propaganda as "reluctant".

-1
lemmy.world

Biden is irrelevant now. But people would rather talk about him than talk about what Palestinians need today.

Fuck Biden, fuck Trump. Let's talk about their needs. No one here seems interested in that.

4

I can't believe there are actually people who are surprised about his 'proposal' at all. Like.. everyone saw this coming, right? Plenty of people have been warning other people for years that Trump would do this sort of shit.

But hey, what do I know. I'm just an alarmist fearmonger. Or whatever they used to call me.

57

"Clean out that whole thing."

He doesn't even pretend it's something other than ethnic cleansing. Just literally "clean out" the Palestinians.

And we're powerless to stop him.

33

And once again the media is creating apologetic headlines. I guess they want people to only realize the leopards ate their faces when they only have their Lying Eyes left.

“Does no one in the media know what it’s called when you ‘clean out’ an ethnic group and expel them from their land?” one commenter asked, adding: "Trump Calls for Ethnic Cleansing of Palestinians From Gaza," that is your headline.”

8

Of course it is ethnic cleansing. But in his opinion, it is the good kind of ethnic cleansing. Just like deporting immigrants, or sometimes even Native Americans...

27
lemmy.world

The "two parties are the same," "Genocide Joe" people are literally quibbling about that just to maintain their arguments and it's depressing.

26
JeeBaiChowreply
lemmy.world

Well after all, if you argue with them, you're a genocide supporting liberal troll. Sometimes in all caps, even!

17
lemmy.world

I always tell them how many hours a week (until recently, for unrelated issues) I have spent sending emails, making phone calls and even visiting politicians' offices to beg for them to do something about the genocide and ask them if they have even sent one form email or made one phone call.

The closest I got to anyone saying they did anything of actual note was someone who hilariously told me that they couldn't tell me what they did because it would ruin their anonymity. As if there would be no possible way to put it in general terms.

I even ask them if they ever have talked to a Palestinian about what they think. But of course not. Because they don't actually care about genocide, they care about berating people and playing political games on the internet.

11
ubergeekreply
lemmy.today

You mean like being outraged people are unwilling to vote for you, because you fully endorsed a genocide?

Or the performative outage at the genocide now, that was somehow "Just a practical necessity" just about 30 days ago?

If genocide support wasn't your bright line before, why is it suddenly your bright line?

-2
programming.dev

I'm sorry you lost me there mate. Let's take them in order

I'm not and have never been a political candidate.

The performative outrage of which I speak is people encouraging that the Democrats be punished despite the explicitly stated desire and highly probable outcome of the Republicans enabling greater atrocities, whilst disregarding the harder and more useful work of pushing individuals to oppose the genocide within the existing system of reality

What is this even meant to mean? This is precisely the performative outrage of which I speak, and it doesn't even carry semantic weight. It's just useless pseudo-accusatory sentiment

3

The performative outrage of which I speak is people encouraging that the Democrats be punished despite the explicitly stated desire and highly probable outcome of the Republicans enabling greater atrocities, whilst disregarding the harder and more useful work of pushing individuals to oppose the genocide within the existing system of reality

How do you push elected reps to not genocide, if there are never repercussions for it, because you'll still always vote for them?

And what greater atrocities are there than genocide? Its like the one thing the entire world (At one point) agreed on, and called it "Crimes against humanity"...

-2
ubergeekreply
lemmy.today

The closest I got to anyone saying they did anything of actual note was

Well, let me assure you, I've done more than just phone calls and emails. However, I cannot admit to them publicly.

-1
lemmy.world

That's a real cop-out and you know it. You could say something extremely general, but you won't, because you haven't done a thing.

4
lemmy.world

Why do you think I voted for the people I contacted? Can you provide some evidence please?

3

Yes, I know your think my view that people should care more about Palestinian genocide than American politics are wrong. I'm just not sure why.

1
lemmy.world

Fuck these people, really. What did they think would happen with Trump?

8

They thought he would pull support for Ukraine and let Russia keep what they'd taken.

After all, that's what they asked him to do.

1
ubergeekreply
lemmy.today

The same thing that happened under Biden, and would have happened under Harris.

-2

And now we would not be surprised if Trump builds some beach resorts there once the Palestinians are gone. I hope you are happy with your endorsement of Trump.

1
lemmy.world

An awful lot of those people are russian bots. But it's not like you can say that on pro Palestinian spaces, because any comments pointing out how delusional protest voting is or how much worse things are getting because of trump will get removed for racism.

-2
ubergeekreply
lemmy.today

How do you propose the voters try to push their representatives to actually represent them, if there's never a repercussion to the representative?

2

You won't, lobbyists will always be louder than voters. It's a rigged system, but it's rigged in such a way that you can either fail or fail much harder. Other than that you have protests (which have become a lot more dangerous) and doing a Luigi. But noone cares about a few people not voting out of protest, turnout is extremely low anyway.

1
sopuli.xyz

Hi I voted for Harris and am pro Palestinian, stop repeating the lie that we are all like this.

1

I wasn't? I literally just said that pointing out that trump is worse for Palestine will get your comment removed from a lot of places. I said nothing at all about Harris voters. Just that lemmy has a fascist/delusional tankie problem.

1
lemm.ee

Fewer Palestinians die today murdered by the apartheid state of Israel than they did one month ago. There is literally no difference, both the democrats and the republicans are more than willing to sacrifice the entire Palestine to their interests in the middle east

0
Rhoerireply
lemmy.world

There is literally no difference

The LGBTQ+ and all free-thinking women in America would probably disagree.

No one voted thinking genocide would end. So I’m not sure what you thought would happen. There is a shit ton of nuance and complexity to that situation and it’s not going ways anytime soon.

But for the other damage trump has promised to cause- tell me…

Did you see Kamala Harris rounding up and deporting American’s born from immigrants? Did you see her restricting trans-rights to serve in the military? Did you see her dismantling our education system? Did you see her pulling us out of climate acts?

It must be nice to be so entitled that you can sacrifice the freedoms of other people because you decided to take on a brand new single issue protest.

Especially when that single issue has been going on for decades before you ever even knew about it.

2

Not to mention, with Harris, we could expect her to respond to backlash pushing her to protect Palestinians, she likely could have at least been pushed by public perception to do better.

Trump is going to do whatever Trump wants to do or is paid to do because he knows his followers aren't going to abandon him, and realistically he's not having to worry about reelection at this point (either he'll term out, be made dictator for life, or decide he just wants to retire (or dies in office, which is entirely possible at his age)). No amount of protesting is going to move him.

2

Both sides aren't the same, but they are in this circumstance. Don't you want more differences between the two mainstream political parties?

0
lemmy.ml

Both are the same: genocidal monsters who want to ethnically cleanse Gaza.

-24
lemmy.dbzer0.com

most normal .ml take directly disproven by the article itself and the rest of the comment section

11
lemmy.ml

I'm willing to condemn genocidal monsters even if they're Democrats

-12
Nunarreply
lemmy.world

You're willing to stand your trash ground to enable worse. The Palestinians deaths and suffering from now are on your hands.

6
prolereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Stop fucking misrepresenting the points of the people you're arguing with. Is that the only way you can "win?" If you create a straw man, and then talk about how shitty the straw man is?

Wow, impressive.

3
lemmy.ca

This too shall pass and once it has, we shall remember the names of those that pushed genocides, those that pushed anti science that will inevitably cause the next pandemic.

17
lemmy.world

I mean this is a pretty weak ass take and it's not even really right. Like after this "passes" we will be fully locked in to rocketing off the edge of the climate abyss and there is nothing anyone could possibly do to prevent it. They will try with Geo engineering but that's a toss up at best.

No one will remember anyone.

12
alvvaysonreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Climate change has a relatively cheap and easy solution.

Aresol sprays can buy a few decades of time if things get too hot.

We already have cheap solar and cheap batteries are becoming a reality. We only need a cheap, non-intermittent energy source to provide baseload energy. Cheap nuclear power is possible and can fill that niche - we had the tech in the past and China has it today.

For about $1T a fleet of reactors could be built to extract all the excess carbon from the atmosphere in 50 years, working in tandem with cheap solar energy and cheap batteries to power human civilization.

-8
lemmy.world

Are you under the delusion the climate disaster is confined solely to energy production?

Also the laws of thermodynamics say that pulling all of that carbon out the air would be not only inefficient to the extreme and take centuries, it would also use far more energy than we currently produce ON THE PLANET.

I have no idea where you got 50 years from, but that's a joke. we couldn't build the shit you would need to do it in 50 years.

2
alvvaysonreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

The laws of thermodynamics say no such thing. Plants use solar energy to extract carbon from the atmosphere daily.

We could farm fast growing crops and bury them to sequester the carbon, but using nuclear energy is going to be cheaper and require less land.

E = mc2

People really don't understand the massive amount of low carbon energy we have at our disposal with nuclear fission.

An unwillingness to use it just means we don't want to solve climate change and would rather have our little "oh noes, world is ending" panic.

China seems to be the only big economy that understands the reality and they will probably solve climate change for the rest of the planet by 2050.

0
lemmy.world

How long does it take to build a reactor: 15-25 yrs each Main component of construction: Concrete, a major contributor to CO2 emissions How many would we need to produce the energy required to run carbon capture infrastructure: ~1500

For your alternative, it has more merits but the main drawbacks come down to where do you grow it, and how does that effect the environment around it. Growing a shitton of kelp is going to create problems with nutrition in that area. I like this method most but the scalability is still a major problem. The amount you would need to grow is STAGGERING. I don't know how we could do that and still have any coastal sea left open. Maybe massive floating barges in the open ocean.

1
alvvaysonreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

It only takes that much time and cost in the West, because we killed nuclear with regulations.

Look how many reactors China is building.

I refuse to take anyone seriously that spouts this level of ignorance on technological matters.

1

You were claiming that a single country could undo all of this. I really don't know how you take yourself seriously. Look at any data. There hasn't been a pause in acceleration let alone a slowdown.

1
Phoenixzreply
lemmy.ca

Its not cheap and not a solution.

It will give us a temporary reprieve at best. We still need to solve the issue by lowering the CO2 in the environment. Chemically speaking, you'll basically have to spend the same amount of energy to pull all the CO2 out as we got over the past 200 year by putting that CO2 in the atmosphere.

That is if we have 100% efficient machines, however. In reality most combustion engines get 30% at best. Electrical system to pull it out will do some 70%? Let's call it 50 on both, so you'll have to double the amount of energy that this cost twice.

Basically, to get CO2 back to preindustrial levels we'll have to spend 4x the amount of ALL the energy we've spent over the past 200 years.

You say it's cheap? Basically double all energy prices (and with that, the prices of everything and destroy all economies) for, say, the next 50 years or so and generate twice the amount of electricity we do now, and we'll be fine.

1
alvvaysonreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Why comment if you don't understand physics. I'm not saying turn the carbon into hydrocarbons, which is wat you are implying.

Carbon sequestration takes way less energy than the energy released during burning.

1
Phoenixzreply
lemmy.ca

Why comment when you're just randomly going to claim that ther person you disagree with must not know the subject because they disagree with you?

Sure, don't convert back to hydro carbons. Where are you going to store all that CO2 in a way that you know it guaranteed won't escape?

Do you have any idea how much CO2 you're talking about? Are you going to store it in high pressure tanks? Are you going to freeze it maybe and put it in caves? Pump the gas underground and pray it won't sleep out?

The reason that I'm talking about converting it back to hydrocarbons is exactly that: you need to store it somewhere stable and reliable. For the incredible amounts that we have to store, there aren't that many options beyond making hydro carbons and storing those

1
alvvaysonreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Perhaps read an introductory article on carbon storage, or ask ChatGPT:

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): This involves capturing CO₂ emissions from industrial sources, transporting it, and storing it underground in geological formations.

Direct Air Capture (DAC): This technology captures CO₂ directly from the air and stores it underground or uses it in industrial processes

It's a sad state of affairs that a fellow human being is more insufferable to talk to than an AI.

0

Yeah, you're right, you are insufferable and sad.

Having said that:

The amount of CO2 to store, depending on how far you want to go with removing all the CO2 humans have put in the atmosphere goes in the order of cubic kilometers. Humans have been, and continue to be busy beavers. Good luck with storing that in tanks.

Storing it in geological formations may be possible in a limited fashion but since it would be in gas form there is a litany of problems with that if you want to be absolutely sure it won't escape.

Instead of bitching and moaning it may be more productive to just, you know, stay on subject.

0
ubergeekreply
lemmy.today

Its even cheaper than your estimates...

We just need to plant trees, and get our forests to grow again. Like, the earth has these fabulous organisms that clean greenhouse gases out of the atmosphere... And they are self-replicating!

1
lemmy.world

Someone almost literally said that to me here. That what Trump is wanting is better than what Biden was doing because this is "just" ethnic cleansing.

28
lemmy.world

It's not a competition because it's fucking moot since the election is over and all of you who think arguing this shit is more important than the welfare of Palestinians disgust me.

1
lemmy.world

What are you talking about? There are lots of Palestinians still alive. Suggesting they're all dead means you're just giving up and conceding it all to Israel. Why?

2
lemmy.world

I have no idea what the point of all these links are for other than proving my point.

2
lemmy.world

Here is my bOtHsIdEs Pikachu face. :|

I'm sure Kamala was going to be exactly the same. /s

16

I’m sure Kamala was going to be exactly the same. /s

Pretty much the only difference is she wouldn't say it out loud, frankly. She clearly stated she had Israel's back, regardless of what anyone said. I mean, look at how she reacted to people stating, to her face, that they could not vote for her, due to that.

And what did she do? She doubled down on her support for the genocide.

3

She was, the only difference is she wouldn't come out and say it bluntly to the American public.

0
xenomorreply
lemmy.world

Fuck off with this nonsense. Kamala would literally push the same policies, just like Joe did. The only difference would be that she’d use vague and hollow language to keep a pretense of humanity up so people could continue pretending that they themselves are not contributing to this atrocity. Your naive picture of mainstream Democrats is why that party continues to be as ineffective as it’s been for 50 years. I welcome all the neoliberal Lemmy downvotes. Assholes.

-18
lemmy.world

Interesting how you're more interested in condemning Biden and Harris for this thing they didn't do than Trump for doing it. In fact, you seem very unbothered by the actual plan here because the Democrats weren't involved.

19
lemmy.world

I can't even blame Russia at this point. These people seriously do not give a shit about this genocide apart from the political points it can score them.

10
lemm.ee

Go to hexbear's mutual_aid community, look at the posts there, and tell me again how much more .world cares about palestinians

-1
ubergeekreply
lemmy.today

In fact, you seem very unbothered by the actual plan here because the Democrats weren’t involved.

The difference is? Trump didn't lie about it, he said, outright this is what he was going to do. Harris planned to do the exact same thing, but with a pride flag, and it would have been a woman making the bombs being dropped onto kids.

0
xenomorreply
lemmy.world

I will think back to threads like this every time I wonder why Democrats never achieve anything meaningful and the country continues to lurch toward fascism. You all seem to be more interested in team sports than actually having principles and expectations for your own party.

-2
_stranger_reply
lemmy.world

The "leftists" on here literally supported Trump. Their reason doesn't matter, they're fascism-enabling Trump supporters in every way that matters.

If you didn't vote, or if you didn't vote for Kamala, you helped Trump get elected. That's not politics, it's math.

8
ubergeekreply
lemmy.today

The “leftists” on here literally supported Trump.

I'm a leftist, and I do not, nor have ever, supported Trump. I just didn't support the other genocider, either. Because I have principles that I stand on, one of which is "Never give support to genociders".

-3
_stranger_reply
lemmy.world

I'm glad you feel good about yourself. Your inaction is part of the problem.

5

Your inaction is part of the problem.

Why isn't Harris' inaction part of the problem? I mean, she could have said,"You know, genocide is bad, and when I take office, I will end all support for Israel until they agree to an immediate ceasefire?"

-3
lemm.ee

The "leftists" on here literally supported Trump

We fucking didn't. Not voting for Kamala isn't supporting Trump, it's just rejecting genocide. If democrats passed progressive policy and stopped a genocide, they might have had a chance, but they'd rather lose the elections to a fascist than actually pushing progressive policy.

-4
lemmy.world

There were no actual leftists on the ballot in every state that campaigned beyond the election year. Kamala was the realistic option. It’s perfectly reasonable to be conflicted about voting for someone because they’re the lesser of two evils, but there’s nothing rational thinking a leftist or faux leftist candidate that only shows up during election years had a realistic chance of winning.

7

It’s perfectly reasonable to be conflicted about voting for someone because they’re the lesser of two evils,

There is no "conflicted" on whether or not I should support a genocider. How well do you sleep at night, knowing you supported a genocider?

-3

Exactly, so you make it clear to the democrats in the meanwhile: either you move to the left, or eat shit. They decided to do the latter. Now start blaming them for the loss and move towards organising labour and political orgs

-3

That everyone who disagrees with me is a “neoliberal”?

No, just that anyone who doesn't cut off someone for being a genocider is a neoliberal ghoul.

2

Centrists are suddenly unhappy now that trump is implementing their only policy for them.

15

US President Donald Trump is facing widespread criticism and accusations of proposing ethnic cleansing after stating that he would like to “just clean out” Gaza and relocate its Palestinian population to neighbouring countries.

Speaking aboard Air Force One during a flight from Las Vegas to Miami on Saturday, Trump described Gaza as a “demolition site” and suggested moving its residents to Jordan and Egypt.

“I’d like Egypt to take people. I’d like Jordan to take people,” Trump said. “You’re talking about probably a million and a half people, and we just clean out that whole thing.”

He added that the move could be either temporary or long-term, saying, “something has to happen”

To everybody who voted against Kamala Harris because she didn't change her stance on Gaza, how does it feel to be played harder than a tenor saxophone?

9

You'll often see Zionists condemn Egypt and Syria for not taking the Palestinians "oh the Palestinians are so bad that even the other Muslim countries won't take them". No, they just don't want to be complicit in ethnic cleansing.

9

when utilitarianism seems less burdensome than whatever twisted knot the "genocide joe" folks have to tell themselves justify their actions, you gotta wonder about the choices they made.

8

Love that all the pearl clutchers are in this thread to say that NOW the genocide is bad, as if they'll catch leftists in a whataboutism.

The truth is that Trump is giving the same carte blanche that Biden did to Bibi. It remains on the people of Israel to stop this conflict, as it always has. You can't pretend the genocide is only bad when your enemy is doing it, this was the same plan under Biden. Trump just likes bragging about the cruelty, whereas Biden was smart enough to pretend to care.

7

The day Trump actually tempers a decision based on the feedback the world gives him, I'll eat my hat. He doesn't give a shit about this kind of criticism. He's right. Everyone else is wrong. One of the few genuine stable geniuses in this world.

7
midwest.social

Stay on message, Democrats! Remember, it wasn't the Democrats fault for losing, it was those loony leftists for going against the approved narrative of the Democratic Party. The Dems aren't out of touch or negligent, and Bill Mahr is funny and relevant.

God the comments suck on this post

7
lemmy.world

Do you think maybe there can be more than one source of culpability for things in this universe?

12
Aceticonreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I think the problem is so many people trying to politically point score by whitewashing a bunch of Genociders by using the actions of a new bunch of Genociders.

"Yeah, but our guys' mass murdering of children was all fairies and unicorns shitting rainbows from their arses whilst those other guys' Genocide is all dark and shit" isn't the Grand Principled argument the tribalists seem to think it is.

It's kind of understandable that anybody with enough Principle in their bodies to trump tribalism is a "little" peeved at people excusing any group of willful and eager collaborators in the mass murder of children, be it the previous bunch or the new bunch.

1
lemmy.world

Seems like the problem in this thread is a bunch of people trying to politically point score by not giving a shit that Trump is moving forward with this because they'd rather condemn people who are not in power and may never be in power again.

I see very little condemnation of Trump and a lot of "Genocide Joe would have done the same thing."

And fuck the Palestinians, they're just a tool in this from what I can tell from such people. How many "Genocide Joe" people here not bothering to condemn Trump have ever even talked to a Palestinian?

5
Aceticonreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Re-read the posts: plenty of people who criticize Biden are also criticizing Trump.

I can't speak for others but I personally am not constantly criticizing Trump because their is no lack of criticizing Trump here so it's not a problem I feel I need to address in my comments, much less do it all the time.

It's the whitewashing of the actions of Genociders that I feel is a problem so my comments are directed at that, and in this thread so far I've only seen the actions of one bunch of Genociders be whitewashed, and that's the Biden bunch.

If this was 4chan I'm sure there would be plenty of comments whitewashing Trump's actions that I would feel the need to counter.

3
lemmy.world

You need to re-read my posts because you are still doing what I am saying, not giving a shit about what is going to happen to Palestinians because you're too busy continuing to argue about an election that was decided months ago.

What have you actually done to try to stop this genocide?

4
Aceticonreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Mainly spreading awareness of what's going and exposing the flawed logic and lies in pro-Israeli propaganda since the very start and pointing out the hypocrisy of those who empower the Genociders by supporting politicians who knowingly and actively give them military support. (To the point that I've actually received e-mails in my native language from a Tel Aviv based organisation inviting me to a "learn about Israel" web course, which is funny 'cause I've never published my e-mail address here)

I'm also a member of a small party in the country I live in which is very loudly against the Israeli Occupation and the Israeli Genocide.

I keep on hammering against the whitewashing of the Democrat Genociders because their actions help normalized the support of Genocide and extreme racism in the US - they're supposed to be an alternative to the likes of Trump, the opposite not the "almost the same but a tiny bit less bad".

Democrats are supposed to walk towards Less Evil, thus opening up a political gap in the middle that also pulls the Republicans over towards Less Evil, but instead Democrats are walking towards More Evil, effectively making the baseline of American politics be Quite A Lot Of Evil and worsening, and supporting the normalization and even increasing extremism of the Evil in the Republican Party.

This isn't about the Present, because that war is lost and all that people have left is Resistance (and me not being in US means I can't be part of that), this is about the Future - if the Democrat leadership comes around to accept that their only chance is to actually be the opposite of Trump in actions, fighting for actual Principles, rather than merely be the slightly dissenting performative voice, then there is hope for improvement otherwise (as indicated by Trumps reelection after what he did last time in office) America is condemned to a cycle of presidents like Trump and worse.

People whitewashing Genocide-support as long as it's done by Democrats ain't gona push the Democrat leadership to start moving towards Less Evil.

0

"Spreading awareness." So getting on the internet and talking shit. Big fucking deal.

Have you spent even five minutes sending a form email and making a phone call? No, apparently not. You can very easily contact politicians in other countries, but you'd rather just sit on your ass and berate people.

And you are the one whitewashing genocide here. You have not spent two seconds discussing what is going to happen to Palestinians and you clearly don't care since they're just pawns in your game.

2

I have said this multiple times. I have spent 4-5 hours a week writing, phone calling, visiting political offices and doing everything else in my power to stop this. I have very little power, so I am doing what I can.

You rioted on one day and did nothing since and that makes me a coward?

1
lemmy.world

Which side is my side? Please present evidence?

Why do you care more about this than you do about Palestinians?

1

Maybe care about the people who are currently victims more than what could happen to you?

1
lemmy.world

I'm not sure what you need explained here. Pretending it's the Democrats and only the Democrats that caused Harris to lose is silly. Sure, they have culpability. So does every person who loudly and repeatedly said not to vote for "Genocide Joe" and then "Holocaust Harris." So do people like me for not trying hard enough to keep Trump out of office.

There's lots of blame to go around, but everyone is going "not me! Not me!"

3
Juicereply
midwest.social

That's fine, it's nice you're taking responsibility, it shows initiative. All I'm saying, all I've ever said, was to stop defending the democrats in this, by persecuting people who voted, or didn't vote, according to their conscience. The dems should be sharply criticized for their failures. Maybe there's lots of blame to go around, but there is a higher concentration of blame where there is a higher concentration of power.

Blame actually isn't worth much to me. But the brow beating, infantalizing, condescending attitude toward working Americans while gate keeping every scrap of power, apparently just to end up losing it to the right, is an absolutely inexcusable yet predictable consequence of deep political corruption. Until you personally start organizing against it, then any blame you try to deflect away from the party by taking it on yourself will be a reflection of your ego, not your willingness to put it on the line and fight for change.

And you don't even have to be a commie like me, you can be a pragmatist/reformist and I'll give you shit but at least I'll respect the struggle. Probably doesn't mean much to you but it beats defending corruption.

-1
lemmy.world

I never defended Democrats. Nor do I think Democrats are even relevant anymore. My whole point in this thread is a bunch of people are arguing over Democrats and Republicans and not giving a shit about Palestinians, just using them as pawns to argue about American politics.

2

Okay thanks for clarifying I'm in a couple threads having similar arguments and got my wires crossed.

My comment was really directed at many of the other commenters who are defending dems and pointing the blame.

I'm glad you're working through the problems and it shows a commitment to truth that is lost in most political discourse so thanks for bringing something nicely and distinctly human to the discourse.

If the point you are trying to make is that our spectacular political theatre of divisiveness and trump is actually moving the discourse away from where it should be grounded, that is the fight for the liberation of Palestinians from genocide and decades of oppression, from the actual suffering and struggles, then we agree. Not sure how I would have gotten that from your first comment, but I'm happy to accept that's what you meant, or whatever your actual intent happened to be.

2
_stranger_reply
lemmy.world

Someone was telling you this shit was going to happen and there was only one way to even have a chance of preventing it. You decided compromise was for losers and are now reaping the rewards of your ill informed, short sighted decision. Why are you whining so much, you got exactly what you were told you would get.

1
Juicereply
midwest.social

So did you! You got exactly what we told you was going to happen, yet its our fault it happened. Look at this post! This whining is on your side my dude. I just can't believe you fools didn't stop with the brow beating after such a catastrophic loss. Couldn't do one fraction of a second of self reflection. I was not telling people not to vote for the democrat, but I didn't hide my real feelings either.

A movement to withhold votes against Democrats has been building for years. the uncommitted movement is ideologically closer to liberal democrats than so called tankies, but Dems threw them under the bus, called them Putin influenced for protesting against a genocide in the only way they knew how. I was fighting for Palestinian liberation in different ways, I don't really get too involved in electoral politics though I'm active politically. Never was I whining. God what projection.

It really demonstrates the two tendencies of liberalism: good conscientious people who are cool and hate injustice, vs. bloodless defenders of private capital who make noises like they care about justice so they can take power and broker influence.

Get a grip, do some actual criticism of your movement, do better for christs sakes. There wouldn't be nearly as many communists and anarchists becoming radicalized if democrats were even a little effective. They are the only force that has the power to oppose the fascists and criminals in charge of the republicans. and they blew it, time and time again. Stop blaming the people, the fucking lemmy posters for Christ sakes, and start looking at your party,and namely where they get their funding.

this may require you to read and process information instead of just repeating what some 68 year old millionaire said. Which may take some growth on your part, so maybe hydrate and stretch a little first.

5
_stranger_reply
lemmy.world

I'm not defending the party, the movement, the history, the people or their choices. I'm pointing out that no one wanted to hold their nose to vote and now we're all swimming in shit.

Downvote me all you want. No amount of political theory will make the math go away. Every single person who decided to not vote, or to vote for catharsis, was a helping hand pushing Trump's ass into the oval office.

Yes, the Democrats pissed you off, yes you should have still voted for them.

0
Juicereply
midwest.social

Its a hell of a situation we are in, but abstracting this one political act away from the movement, the people, their choices, the history behind it all, is the only reason you are able to look at the situation in such a limited way.

I believe you, that you want to get your intentions or beliefs untangled from whatever schemes political and economic elites are cooking. It is a great tragedy that people didn't vote to keep Trump out. But if you want your individual beliefs to stand on their own and hold water on their own, then you have to extend the same courtesy to conscientious uncommitted voters.

For months people told me I was a bot for daring to suggest Biden was too old to run. Then that view was vindicated too late, and when progressives wanted to get in line behind Kamala, it was made pretty clear that other than uncomfortable noises and "concerns" about the genocide, money and weapons were still going to flow. Do you understand that this lesser evil messaging was doomed to fail? millions of voices on the left who are in no way hoping for another trump term were warning exactly this, and were silenced, not to mention beaten, arrested, kicked out of school or worse for daring to put their bodies on the line for Palestinians?

Maybe ask yourself why the most progressive stripe of voters withheld their vote, while millions of others just didn't think, maybe wrongly, that it would affect them either way. Was there a conspiracy by Russia and other countries? I mean its been established, I think, that a great deal of this goes on. So let me ask you: in this situation, where democracy is being attacked from without and within, night and day by well funded and well organized forces, do you think that a mere vote every 4 years or so is enough to actually prevent the degeneration of a democracy? Or might it take quite a bit more effort? Second question: have the democrats proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are worth that vote, so that the critical mass of rational and conscientious people in this country would not have grounds to doubt their commitment to restoring democracy and overcoming fascism?

My answer to both questions is no. This does not make me naive or idiotic, but I'm afraid that is how I am made to feel, made to seem, by the mainstream of the Democratic party. And so were hundreds of thousands or perhaps millions of other Americans whose conscience would not allow a vote for genocide.

The oppression of the Palestinian people didn't begin on oct7, let's not pretend that Democrats werent culpable before and after. Therefore there is good reason to doubt the dems would have influenced any meaningful change in the conflict

2
_stranger_reply
lemmy.world

The only political act that was being asked of the millions who didn't vote was to vote. That's the only political act that matters in this contact. It's the lowest possible bar in a democracy. Show up, check a box. I get that it sucks, but this, what we have now, is going to be so much worse.

Just to sum up my point: The system is rigged hard against any kind of progressivism. The left might be able to influence a Democrat, it absolutely will not influence a Republican, and a third party has absolutely zero chance of getting elected.

If third parties want clout, they have to build it from the ground up, and that means money in a capitalist system. Where's all the third party money that's going to help defeat the established parties? It doesn't exist.

Again, I'm not celebrating his reality, I'm only pointing out that it's always been that way and opting out of having a voice isn't going to do shit to change it.

Not voting is hurting the people we care about, all for the sake of feeling better about yourself.

1
Juicereply
midwest.social

A system that restrict democracy to checking a box every 4 years while silencing peaceful opposition calling for peace, is not a democracy it is tyranny. You won't be able to sell tyranny to me as democracy. And every cycle that the deep political corruption at the heart of the Democrats exposes itself for what it is, more and more people see it for what it is.

They didn't create these contradictions, neither did you and neither did I. But many people are responsible and benefit directly from the carnage. And your plan to oppose them is to stay dumb and stand in line every 4 years.

I said it elsewhere, but it just shows the divide in the Democrats between the progressives and the establishment. The fact that you've resigned to a single unconscionable viewpoint doesn't mean that other people are stupid for going the opposite way. The Palestinian people have been the victims of liberal pragmatism for 75 years. I know you want to collapse all morality and ethics into a single moment when a ballot is cast, but seriously don't you think that view is somewhat convenient for the establishment? Is this the society you want to take part in and participate in?

No its not, you dread to do it but once every 2-4 years as a matter of duty. But people who don't subscribe to your sense of moral duty, no different than the enemy right? Cant you see how self defeating it all is?

2

Refusing to participate grants you zero benefit, and makes it easier for the system to continue.

This has nothing to do with political viewpoints, this is math. There's no way in hell you're going to tear it down from the outside so what's the plan? Sit there and feel smug that you did nothing while everyone suffers?

Checking the box is the bare minimum, and you couldn't even do that, because it made you feel icky.

Your protest vote, or non vote (same thing), holds negative value for the people of Palestine.

0
Rhoerireply
lemmy.world

So… you’re actually saying that your protest successfully got trump elected- in defense of someone accusing you of helping to get trump elected….

-2
Juicereply
midwest.social

No I'm saying that material reality affects peoples views more than your version where people are dumb babies; and acknowledging that, let alone standing next to us in struggle could have carried Democrats to victory, instead they abandoned even the semblance of ethics and morals other than "Cheeto bad." Some people, and you may struggle with this because of an apparent lack of empathy or theory of mind, although maybe not, are not able to cash in their ethics and morals for a pat on the back and literally nothing else, from the same people who are resolved to continue the genocide. Maybe you can, but others have more character and compunction.

Hopefully someday you have experiences that stimulate growth as a person.

And like I'm not particularly partial to taking this view of you as some kind of vampire bereft of all reason and conscience. But when you do it to others, don't get grumpy when someone calls you out on it. If you don't like the way it feels, and if you think its possible that you might take a contrary position to me because of our roles on either side of this discourse, then think about how when you do it, it affects others.

Fuck me for thinking you should be better than that!

4
Rhoerireply
lemmy.world

So… I’m having difficulty understanding because of your obvious intellectual superiority, but…

I’m going to need a simple answer here:

Did your protest work, or not?

Because if it did, then it would seem to me- in my humble ignorance, that you enabled a trump victory.

But if it didn’t, then it would seem to be, also in my humble ignorance, that you enabled a trump victory.

Be sure to use small words so that my brain can understand.

-2
Juicereply
midwest.social

My question is answered by your question: did you and the democrats stand with the Palestinians or did you stand with Israel?

The organization you are defending with your bad faith questioning is one where it is impossible to stand with ones own principles against genocide. Democrats could not convincingly demonstrate that they would stand by Palestinians and end this genocide, even after the UN and an avalanche of international bodies, legally and scientifically proved that it was indeed a genocide that was occurring. Even then, there was just an uncomfortable shifting of feet as democrats who had been receiving campaign contributions on the order of millions of dollars over decades, were forced to either stand against that money or genocide.

They chose money, and the people who stood against the fascist oppression of the Palestinians, chose to stay home.

Because you know what didn't work? Standing with Israel when the time came to support Palestine, and then expecting people to be guilt tripped into turning out to vote for Democrats. To be clear, i never once advocated for staying home on election day, but at least I was able to surmise it by looking at the situation.

You act like I'm putting on an air of intellectual superiority, but my standards for consciousness of the situation are actually quite low. I would ask that someone would learn about and think about the situation leading up to a particular event, which you seem to want to ignore; and I ask that you have a measure of empathy. Your inability to demonstrate either should not be read as my judgement of you, but your own guilty judgement of your own fucked up reasoning that you want to put on to me. Save it for your therapist.

2

As expected, walls of text without answering a simple yes or no question.

-2
ubergeekreply
lemmy.today

No, what they are saying is the Dem's consistent refusal to listen to their voters, and instead thinking that voters "owe" their votes to the dems, is what got Trump elected.

2
Rhoerireply
lemmy.world

How on earth does refusing to listen to voters equal losing an election without also admitting that you are responsible for the outcome of an election if this was your reason to protest vote/stay home?

You either had an effect on the election that caused trump to win via your act of protest, or you didn’t/ and therefore don’t get to say “we told you this would happen.”

If you didn’t vote in protest; or voted third party to send a message to the democrats, then you get to take the blame for trump. That is how a logical conclusion is made.

If you chose not to eat chicken because you don’t like it, and your only other option is to eat pasta, and you don’t like that either-

It is YOUR fault you are hungry, not all the other people eating their dinners.

Seriously…. Even children should be able make this distinction. But I guess that’s what happens when arrogance meets shame-

You get stubborn ignorance.

0
ubergeekreply
lemmy.today

How on earth does refusing to listen to voters equal losing an election without also admitting that you are responsible for the outcome of an election if this was your reason to protest vote/stay home?

Because I don't blame individual voters, for the decisions of the candidate running?

You either had an effect on the election that caused trump to win via your act of protest, or you didn’t/ and therefore don’t get to say “we told you this would happen.”

So, no fault goes to the candidates? At all?

It is YOUR fault you are hungry, not all the other people eating their dinners.

Isn't it the fault of the person who only provided the food, and only giving the choice between shit sandwich and diarrhea soup?

If voters protest voting had an effect, doesn't that mean the blame lies with the candidate who wholly ignored the voters? Because they ignored the voters during the election, its fair to say they would be ignored after the election.

Seriously…. Even children should be able make this distinction. But I guess that’s what happens when arrogance meets shame-

Yes, even a child should be able to make the distinction of genocide being evil, regardless of the purported justification.

And, here's a spoiler: I voted for Harris! Yes, it was a very selfish decision on my part, because I have direct interactions daily with, well, most of all the groups that were being impacted under Biden, and now under Trump. At best, I was hoping for 4 more years of radicalizing people.

But guess what? I still am working to radicalize people.

2

No one said the candidate or the party takes no blame. That’s foolish to even think to assume.

But 90 million people didn’t vote. It’s safe to say that several million of those were single issue protesters. And then the over 3 million third party voters?

Yeah…

It’s your fault you’re hungry.

0

there was only one way to even have a chance of preventing it

State level electoral reform so people can vote outside the two party system without a spoiler effect

2
ubergeekreply
lemmy.today

Someone was telling you this shit was going to happen and there was only one way to even have a chance of preventing it

Preventing what? A genocide?

Harris was all on board with it.

0
_stranger_reply
lemmy.world

Well never know, she's not the president.

Trump, the guy you enabled, however, Is. And he's a fucking nightmare.

He wants to displace every Palestinian by force and hand their land to Israel.

Is that what you non-voted for? Take a plane to the Gaza Strip and preach that on a corner, see how well that works out for you.

-1
ubergeekreply
lemmy.today

I voted for Harris, even though I didn't want to.

End result, for Palestinians are the same, regardless, though. She supported a genocide of them.

3

Well, the truth can sting a little if you've just found out you've been fooled. The important thing is to grow up and learn from your mistake.

1
lemmy.world

Well you sure showed those democrats by not voting huh? Like shooting yourself but calling it a win because you got blood on the other guy.

The American left has become so toxic, and splintered into micro groups with special labels who all hate each other and reject each other's support while blaming each other and calling anyone even slightly right or even left of you an enemy. Meanwhile the right was united while trump and Netanyahu played you all so blatantly and obviously and you all bought it.

Well I’m sure Gazans thank you American leftists for staying home and letting trump win. I’m sure your blaming democrats will make them feel better

0
lemmy.world

Sadly you're damned if you do, damned if you don't. If you're voting you're supporting the status quo of the Dems really only listening to corporate backers, if you're not voting you're letting the opposition (Trump) have a better chance at office (which he did get). They're both terrible options, and I'm not sure blaming individuals who are tired of having to fight for the lesser evil instead of a better tomorrow is fair

8

Are you suggesting that material conditions can be contradictory, moving people to make different, equally rational, decisions for conflicting reasons, rather than just being two camps that define all moral obligations as the opposite of the other?

Someone should look into this

1

I did vote, but I was also trying to tell people that the whole strategy of browbeating wasn't going to work. But that's all the dems have to offer which is why they lost.

2
lemmy.world

Biden was a poor president, maybe given Harris was his vice-president we could guess she might be a poor president also. Trump on the other hand is evil. Anyone that voted for him should be ashamed of themselves. If he was running against a bag of frozen brussel sprouts the bag of sprouts would make a better president than him.

6

It's the exact same as last time. Hilary would have been bad, but Trump is actively evil and destructive. I wanted Burnie, but I still voted for Hilary because it's a two party system and I understand how spoiler votes work. Now we're all fucked and I hope every single person who voted for the Orange Idiot suffers for it.

14
lemm.ee

Because he funded and enabled a genocide, maybe? No betterment of worker rights, no betterment of welfare state, no meaningful legislation to improve healthcare and to make it universal, no push towards a public pensions system, dramatic rise in fossil gas exports...

5
P00ptartreply
lemmy.world

He did lower the cost of medications significantly. And it was undone with a signature. He defended Ukraine, he put in a decent infrastructure bill, got some green projects in. Yeah, granted, he also allowed a former president to walk free from 90 felonies, leading to where we are now. Dude should have been on gallows and somehow he's now the president. THATS where Biden fucked up. (Please read further, I will explain that controversial point.)

And ya know? That's a pretty big fuck up. Yes, Gaza was a huge fuckup. But, I would argue that it was a cause of not hitting Trump harder and faster with the DOJ. Had he been further along in the justice system, he wouldn't have been able to even campaign. He should have been prosecuted immediately for Jan 6. There was no excuse to wait. Gather other evidence while he's in court for that, as J6ers are going to prison one after the other, trump would be in prison before going to court over stolen documents, hush money, or anything else. If he would have jumped on that, we'd be living in a different world right now. He wouldnt have been able to gather steam and likely wouldn't even have primaried. The Democrats where in an upward trajectory. Then Russia and then Israel, but, if that pile of shit was behind bars, Biden would be able to throw more weight into decisions. Who would be able to touch Biden, had it not been trump? Anyone? But because Trump was there, he played possum. If they had moved on him when they should have, our country would be getting better, instead of swan diving off a cliff. Honestly at the rate we're going, we lose hegemony and GDP to China in less than 2 years.

3

Honestly at the rate we're going, we lose hegemony and GDP to China in less than 2 years.

Can't fucking wait for the genocidal empire to fall

2

Primarily? Because of his support for a genocide. That makes anyone objectively an evil person.

3

Biden was also evil. Less evil than Trump maybe, but trying to claim be wasn't evil goes beyond pragmatism and into white washing genocide.

1

Right here, still glad I voted for the anti-genocide candidate instead of the 2 pro-genocide candidates

Biden was already actively doing the ethic cleansing that trump is talking about

1
Rhoerireply
lemmy.world

I think their… cicadian rhythm only allows them to wake every 3½ years, make a lot of obnoxious noise, and then go back to sleep, or… “спать” as they like to call it.

0

Some people are working on changing how we vote so 3rd party voters can vote how they want and still have their vote count against the Republicans.

I guess you're to busy telling people how to vote to come up with a solution to the problem you are so concerned with.

2

The guy who defines everything by "great countries " and "shithole countries" wants to clean the shithole out and all the shitty people. Hmmm

5