Wife of former Marine to be deported to Mexico Friday, after 20 years in U.S. (2018)
Temo didn't figure his vote for President Donald Trump would affect them personally. That was before the enforcement of Mr. Trump's "zero tolerance" policy toward illegal immigrants.
https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/wife-of-former-marine-to-be-deported-to-mexico-friday-after-20-years-in-u-s/Open linkView original on discuss.tchncs.de313
Comments67
Pretty pathetic that a community of deported military spouses exists there. So much for “supporting the troops”.
I'd live in Merida. Its a lovely little city and nice people.
I’m glad, hope my comment didn’t come across as disparaging it. Just sad that a spousal expat community there is even a necessity.
And beaauuuuutiful beaches, omg.
There's this thing in Roman history, where the Romans basically stopped being warriors and left all the fighting to men from the provinces like Gaul. Despite the Gauls being a part of the Roman Empire for centuries, and being their main fighting force and protectors, the Romans still saw them as barbarians and looked down on them. They were just as educated as Romans by this point but were still seen as others. Of course that eventually blew up in their face when those "barbarians" turned on the the Romans and chased them out of their own city.
Anyways, that's how Trump supporters view people of color in the military. They fight for them and protect them but they're still "barbarians" and they don't want them around.
I think that your history is a bit off. The tribes that overturned the western Roman empire were not from Gaul.
This articles from 2018.
Hmmm who was President then?
Here's a follow up where she came back during Biden's term: https://www.stripes.com/incoming/2021-05-19/%E2%80%98It-felt-like-a-miracle%E2%80%99-Marine-veteran%E2%80%99s-wife-returns-to-US-three-years-after-being-deported-to-Mexico-1495210.html
It's probably the guy you voted for because it clearly needs to be spelled out in Crayon for you.
August 3, 2018
This is an article from 2018 that is very likely to repeat next year
Quite possibly with the same people.
Boo fucking hoo.
The post title and 3 top level comments all day 2018. But some people still struggling.
It was edited 2 hours after it got posted so maybe title got changed after the comments.
Oh that's fair. I thought titles couldn't be edited
This is the real reason biden lost. Even the people who did read the 2018 are somehow thinking biden was president then.
In this thread... People who think this is a current article, and aren't asking why Biden is splitting up families.
Is this really something you'd approve of Biden doing?
The article is not current, but now it's not the first time people voted for Trump. 2018 wasn't Biden's term.
Oh I get that. That's not my point.
You think Biden was president in 2018? I bet you also wonder why Obama didn't do more about 9/11. See, you people having a vote is why we can't have a good country.
I see you failed critical reading.
They think this was done under Biden.
Their objection is lacking.
This article is from 2018.
Who was president then?
Just wait. I’m sure there will be similar articles in 2025 you’ll be able to post.
I really hope every average Joe that voted for him gets exactly what they asked for.
If you don't have any Trump stories from this decade, it might be time to open your eyes.
Oh he's changed since then? I guess 4 years is plenty of time for self improvement. Can you tell me what regime he followed?
More like the "journalist" should probably write about something more recent. That's what I meant.
..... It was written in 2018....
No you don't understand, the "journalist" was supposed to write an accurate article about 2024, back in 2018. Is it real journalism if there's no time travel or scrying powers involved?
See now YOU look like an idiot! The "journalist" should have written the article ABOUT 2025 in 2018 and posted it in 2024.
The Internet it full of dummies.
You mean like where he repeatedly promised to do the same thing during his current campaign? Or where he promised to destroy the US economy by imposing 60% tariffs that will cause rampant inflation and destroy working class consumers?
I think as long as the article date is in the title for old news, like this post, the relevant posts are fine.
Having historical references are pretty helpful, and hilarious.
i'm not sure i would call this hilarious.
Oh no...
... anyway
As others have pointed out, the article was from 2018. I wonder how Temo voted this time.
Are those policies from Trump's first term?
Yes. This story happened during and as result of Trump's first term
... What do you think?
I'm just surprised Biden or the the Dems haven't done anything about this.
https://www.stripes.com/incoming/2021-05-19/%E2%80%98It-felt-like-a-miracle%E2%80%99-Marine-veteran%E2%80%99s-wife-returns-to-US-three-years-after-being-deported-to-Mexico-1495210.html
You have the entirety of humanity's fuckin' knowledge at your fingertips. Like do we really gotta bring back LMGTFY?
Ok so why the heck was this posted in the first place???? I was under the impression this read recent and it was the authorities going ahead before Trump was even sworn in. This was confusing.
Buddy, it says 2018 right in the title.
Just note this whole thing for next time and I hope you learn from it. People will repost old material sometimes just to remind what happened under previous circumstances, not limited to politics.
You see something crazy, look into it a little bit, you're already on the internet, what's another couple of minutes to get some closure?
I find your tone very condescending. What did I do to you?
A retired one? I mean I get what you're saying but I'm not referring to some 50 year old Trumper fatass as a marine just cause he used to do it
Someone that was in the marines but is not currently.
Someone who separated or retired from the Marine Corps. If you're not putting the uniform on at least once a month anymore then you're not a Marine anymore. You are a Former Marine and you have an entire community. Yelling at civilians for not getting your inside motivational slogan is peak boot.
This couldn't have been Trump, he doesn't take office until January. Why is the media pretending to care about these stories now?
This article is from 2018, halfway through Trump's first term in office.
You had 20 years to become a legal citizen. After that period of time, getting deported is on you.
The system is unfortunate in that you can't apply for legal status while you're in the country illegally. Like you get married, you then have to leave the country and apply for a spouse visa from a consulate. Even if you leave, if you've been in the country out of status for over a year, you're barred from getting a visa for 10 years(even as a spouse or parent). She likely had no legal path to stay with her family. It's fucked.
Biden tried to do something about that and failed. https://www.npr.org/2024/11/08/g-s1-33370/judge-biden-program-immigrant-spouses-deportation
I get that though. If a country endorses that, you're inviting more people to break the law, get in the country, then apply for citizenship.
Also, what happened to green cards? A non-legal citizen marries a legal one, and eventually they get citizenship. Is that not a thing anymore?
You need an immigrant visa to start getting a green card. Technically a green card is a visa, really. It's a whole change of status thing that is quite Byzantine.
And in general, I do not see the punitive value of breaking up families. It's like cutting off your nose to spite your face.
Because you're sending a message that it's ok to break the law as long as you eventually are in compliance with the law. This is a complicated situation, especially when you have a wife/husband and children involved. I won't pretend to have all the answers. Obviously no one is happy when a family of many years is separated, but this person knew what they were doing was wrong (from a legal perspective), and did it anyway. Just like breaking any other law, there are consequences for our actions.
In this case we're creating all the social ills and costs that broken families entails, being monsters, and punishing frankly a minority of those that lack status. All for a bad policy. I mean, you yourself thought there was a pathway when we started this conversation because obviously that's the most humane and sensible thing to do.
I'm sorry, what does this have to do with voting Trump? Trump isn't in the white house yet, he doesn't have this power yet. Come January, sure shit will hit the fan but for the moment this doesn't seem to be a trump issue yet.
This is an article from 2018, this is what Trump has already done. It's to show what he will continue to do.
It has to do with voting Trump, because it's a news story from 2018 when Trump was president, and shows what's going to happen again.
If you had read the article, you might have figured it out on your own.
Then again...
This is from 2018, when Trump was in charge.
I know others have already pointed out that the article was from when Trump was president, but it's always good to remember (as folks should have done prior to November 05) that there are almost always degrees of difference.
Check the date
Point taken.