Spyke
BigPotatoreply
lemmy.world

DOD doesn't want to pay upkeep and it was designed for roadside bombs in remote mountains not Iranian drones.

Might as well give it to the cops, in case one of their supporters accidentally hits it while trying to bomb a women's shelter or something.

71
Madison420reply
lemmy.world

They're specifically not to be used on roads because they don't fit, rollover if sneezed at and destroy our roads but fuck it they're police right?

26

I dunno, it might have to “monster truck” its way over all the other motor vehicles already parked in the bike lane.

7
sh.itjust.works

I'm confused about the design. If it's designed for mountain areas but is top heavy and rolls easy, isn't that a major design floor for an area where the terrain is likely to be steep from left to right in parts?

Maybe my idea of terrain in mountainous areas is wrong.

7
antonreply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

It's designed to stay on roads.
Those roads are natural choke points where bombs are often hidden on the ground, which results in a high and heavy design.

5

MATV begs to differ. We always had the technology. We just wanted a cheap solution to stop taking so many casualties.

3

Correct, they move slow but they are quite explosion survivable past the original design.

2

You have correctly identified one of many reasons the military hated these.

4

Tall but narrower than other options while having survivability in case of getting IED'd. I know HMMWVs are actually big but the MRAPs didn't all have a much larger footprint.

Fun fact though, they had to add a gunners harness because the gunners were more likely to die in a roll over. Armored plates all up over your back but you get crushed because the Specialist driving hasn't even driven anything bigger than his Civic and doesn't have enough hours dealing with actual Afghan roads.

2

Hey, you can easily get them up to 50mph on an airfield runway and feel the death rattle telling you to slow down. It's basically all operator error.

1
crusa187reply
lemmy.ml

Is it “gifted” to them, or are they paying taxpayer dollars to purchase these war machines? When they’re turning our local communities into war zones, some of us might even question whether we should reduce their funding significantly if this is what they’re squandering our money on.

Watch them cower inside of this vehicle, idling in the parking lot as a school shooter empties one magazine after another.

3

They pay little to nothing to get them, then they pay everything to keep, maintain, and store it. As someone else noted, looks like it's already leaking oil.

6
Maggotyreply
lemmy.world

They pay very little for it. Essentially shipping.

3
crusa187reply
lemmy.ml

Hmm, can’t decide if that’s better or worse.

3

Title of your sex tape our government's entire domestic agenda...

1
lemmy.world

I feel like these should be used as a sort of honey pot. If your police department buys one of these, fire everyone and start over from scratch.

101
Melonpolyreply
lemmy.world

I think these are handed down for cheap/free by the military. Not that a police department needs these types of vehicles.

27
ShunkWreply
lemmy.world

Precisely this. If the military donates it, they can get budget to get a new one.

17
Mirshereply
lemmy.world

DoD hardware for police usually comes with contracts that state they have to be maintained in working order, because the DoD can just take them back if there's a military need.

Effectively, it's the PD paying to warehouse and maintain DoD equipment for them, as long as the DoD doesn't mind the stuff getting used once in a while.

7

The military will never want these back. In fact most of the stuff they give police is extremely obsolete from a military perspective.

3

It's a cover. The military is never asking for this equipment back unless they're conscripting the cops to the front line in the Rockies because of the surprise North Korean invasion.

2
midwest.social

Let's say you're a cop and you get a call: there's a hispanic gay crossdresser armed with a .50BMG sniper rifle with explosive rounds reported on the roof of the KwikeeMart, and they're threatening to shoot the Walmart across the street unless they're called by their proper pronouns, black lives/matter. This situation calls for an immediate response with at least a MRAP, and that's only because they don't have the funding for an airstrike from an A-10.

93

Yeah I mean they would need an MRAP to keep them safe while they wait for the shooter to finish up or run out of ammo. We've got to think of the officers and their safety.

49
Maggotyreply
lemmy.world

Fun fact. That MRAP does not protect against .50 cal rounds.

17
frezikreply
midwest.social

All the better reason for the government to fund the airstrike option.

7
lemmy.world

[...] only because they don't have the ran out of funding for an airstrike from an A-10.

FTFY

11
lemmy.world

Operating an A-10, without firing its nose gun, runs about 19k-25k and hour. A full load of rounds is 1200. They fire at a rate of 3900 rounds per minute. The rounds, depending on the exact type, cost between 90 and 175$ per round. This also doesn't include the cost of maintaining the gun which incurs a lot of maintenance because of all the heat, and forces, involved.

4
lemm.ee

For real? Shooting the entire load of ammo is done in like 20 seconds? SO all those brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr memes should be more like brrr?

3

correct. the reality is that is fires in short bursts. the rounds are huge and include, DU and tungsten cores, incendiary loads, high explosives, and others. a one second burst of fire from the A-10's GAU 8 Avenger Gatling gun is enough to destroy anything the rounds can penetrate.

2
lemmy.world

In that case, I'd like to have one A10 airstrike of loan forfait please.

Pretty please?

1

I mean, we can't exactly shoot loan forfaiting. We can shoot the financial industry executives though.

1
Dragster39reply
feddit.de

Didn't police actually bomb parts of a town? But that might be from my limited knowledge about history

9

Yeah, the Phillie cops bombed an entire city block into rubble when they went after the MOVE group of fanatics. Coincidentally it was in a black neighborhood. What were the chances of that, eh?

20
lemmy.world

Please, anyone who reads this, stop posting links to the mobile version of Wikipedia. It doesn’t switch automatically on PC, and I see it happen all the time. Just take the half a second to remove the “.m” from the beginning of the link, save everyone else from the pain of having to be surprised by it and taking the time to do it themselves.

4
lemmy.world

I totally missed that. I completely agree and apologize for the oversight.

1

Please, anyone who reads this, stop posting links to the mobile version of Wikipedia. It doesn’t switch automatically on PC, and I see it happen all the time. Just take the half a second to remove the “.m” from the beginning of the link, save everyone else from the pain of having to be surprised by it and taking the time to do it themselves.

-1
Thomradereply
lemmy.world

Tulsa, I believe they bombed the black communities while attempting an ethic genocide.

5
lemmy.world

Slightly too big to fit through a school hallway. Just big enough to wait outside in the parking lot. We'll take it - TX police

89
Kiosadereply
lemmy.ca

Lol yeah, i like how no one else realizes it’s supposed to be IED (Improvised Explosive Device)

36
lemmy.world

They meant what they said. It's Texas- they seem far more afraid of women's issues than explosives.

61

You know, i hadn’t considered that, but that makes a lot of sense actually!

6
Demdarureply
lemmy.world

Oh, me? Nah. Now, that car, damn that's radical. Imma gonna enlist! :D

No, really, why do you think they post these?

19

because they believe those boots will never be on their necks, that's why

13
lemmy.world

I'm sure they do. But radicalized to do what? Wave a sign? Write an angry letter? Vote?

Besides, excessively strident opposition to the police MRAP will get you labeled a tankie.

-22
HessiaNerdreply
lemmy.world

No, shilling for Russia will get you labeled as a tankie. Not wanting police to have what is essentially a light tank, will not get you labeled as a tankie. Don't try to dilute the term.

32

Seriously.

It's like when you see a post about punching Nazis, and concern trolls show up to complain about people misusing and overusing the term. They don't offer a correction, and they're not defending anyone because no specific person or group of people was called out. They just saw a negative post about Nazis and fascists, got defensive, and tried to muddy the waters. A hit dog will holler.

Also, obviously any term will be misused and overused, and I don't know every context people are talking about. But, for my part, I see complaints about people being called "tankies" way more often than people being called tankies, and in situations like the above. And it's usually accompanied by complaints that right-wingers are calling people tankies, something I don't actually see all that often. What I see more often than that is the terminally online, gatekeeping left. So, is the problem coming more from actual conservatives, or from leftists that other ostensible leftists want to dismiss out of hand?

I don't know what's in anyone's heart, the specific people they're talking about, or the contexts and personal experiences they're talking about. I'm not going to assume bad faith. But, when I see people jump in to say "tankie" is a meaningless phrase, it just sounds like the same rhetorical game when people try to say "Nazi" and "fascist" have become meaningless.

3
Maggotyreply
lemmy.world

I would love to believe you. But I've been called a tankie too many times in the last few months for the brave position of... "We shouldn't be funding a genocide".

2
Moneoreply
lemmy.world

Who the fuck cares if some random person calls you a tankie?

1

I don't particularly care. But it does show how diluted it is already when Biden stans are using it to "other" anyone who won't fall in line.

4
lemmy.world

shilling for Russia will get you labeled as a tankie

I've heard it aimed at anyone who is anti-cop. I've heard it aimed at folks advocating a general strike. I've heard it hurled at Palestine protesters. I've heard it aimed at people who won't vote for Joe Biden.

Don’t try to dilute the term.

Way too late for that.

2

Someone that thinks "tankies" are a thing that most people talk about or have even heard of outside of "online" needs to go listen to the bees buzz.

5
RaoulDookreply
lemmy.world

That's just some stuff that you claim that you've heard. For the rest of us those are not the definitions. Tankie does not mean anti-cop at all, it's a pro-authoritarian label for authoritarian communists.

1
lemmy.world

Tankie does not mean anti-cop at all, it’s a pro-authoritarian label

It's a "pro-Russia/China" label. You can be as authoritarian as you like without being a tankie. You just need to couch it as pro-NATO or pro-American.

But any suggestion that Western censorship, trade sanctions, or militant policing is bad can get you tagged as a Russian Bot or Chinese Wumao.

3
RaoulDookreply
lemmy.world

Nope, your last sentence is just plain wrong. Anywhere on Lemmy or Reddit or similar sites you look, it is a mainstream acceptable position to criticize any of those.

3

This is literally a thread on an anti-communist instance complaining that militant policing is bad...

1
lemmy.world

You won’t get labeled a tankie if you think the people’s police shouldn’t have one either. Then you get labeled an anarkiddie

3
lemmy.world

You won’t get labeled a tankie if you think the people’s police shouldn’t have one either.

If you're going all in on the "Fuck the CCP! Fuck Castro! Fuck Vuvuzela!" memes, maybe. But you need to lean in hard. Never let them think your hate is less than pure.

Then you get labeled an anarkiddie

Sure. Everyone knows why we need the Good Kind of Cops.

Proceeds to scroll through Nextdoor Ring camera porch pirate posts in earnest

-1
lemmy.world

I’m actually mixed on Castro. Venezuela isn’t communist. Neither is the CCP (I stand with the Chinese leftward opposition). And while we’re at it, the USSR shot the Soviets and killed the Revolution at Kronstadt.

Vietnam though? I can respect Vietnam. I don’t always agree with what they do, but they’re really doing their best.

It wasn’t the anarchists who keep doing dengist bullshit

3

Venezuela isn’t communist. Neither is the CCP

They are very real and literal instances of Communist economic theory put into practice.

And while we’re at it, the USSR shot the Soviets and killed the Revolution at Kronstadt

That's ahistorical, if for no other reason than the full cohort of Communist policymakers in Russia weren't hiding on a single naval base in four years after the October revolution.

Might as well claim the CIA killed all Latin American Communists in Bolivia during 1967.

It wasn’t the anarchists who keep doing dengist bullshit

Anarchists repeatedly tried and failed to build working power bases, all during the 1920s. From Communes in Paris to Shanghai, from Sioux Reservations to Spanish Republicans, the fascist militaries absolutely demolished anarchist movements.

Dengism, by contrast, secured the Chinese state from reconquest and expanded the Chinese economy to its modern apex.

No anarchist government can claim to have ended domestic poverty, excised foreign landlords, harnessed nuclear power, or put a flag on the moon.

Fifteen five year plans later, no other country is doing better.

Vietnam though? I can respect Vietnam.

Sure. They've been phenomenal. But they are following that same Chinese playbook. Harnessing foreign investment for domestic capital improvements and cancelling the dividends into a rising quality of life is a recipe for success.

This is textbook Marxism.

-1
fedia.io

This is a little town on the north outskirts of the Dallas metro area with a population of about 38,000. The reasons they need it are innumerable. /s

59
lemmy.world

Protect from IUDs?! intrauterine devices?? They sure are taking birth control seriously in Prosper boys..

54

Improvised Uterine Device? Medically-assisted abortions are gone but the police still need protection from coat hangers.

15

I mean those gentleman need an MRAP to keep all the ladies off of them. You never know when an IUD is going to get you.

7
uranibabareply
lemmy.world

Is this a typo? I can't find what IUD could mean otherwise.

6
lemmy.ca

Let's not pretend the average cop isn't too stupid to understand "I"mprovised "E"xplosive "D"evice.

It wasn't some "witty pun on IED and DUI". It was an idiot cop not knowing the proper acronym, nothing more.

7

how could he possibly just see a three letter acronym and change the order HE MUTHT BE INTHANE

3

Hmm, how indeed. Maybe try some trick like holding the word in front of a mirror and see what happens?

3

Looks like they are ready to violently suppress the rioting MAGAts when they riot after their criminal leader is imprisoned. What's that? Those that work forces are the same that burn crosses? I guess they're ready for any counter-protestors.

50
lemmy.ca

IUD?

Intra-Uterine Device??

How much of a threat is female birth control to these people??

47
lemmy.world

Militarization of police.

Can't use military on U.S. soil against its citizens? Turn police into the military to be used against its citizens.

45
Donkterreply
lemmy.world

Also: does the US have less troops on the ground around the world than they usually do? Gotta find a new market for the military industrial complex.

1

Don't worry.. terrorism will never end and wars will always find a way to creep back into our lives.

1
andros_rexreply
lemmy.world

I suggest anyone interested in the history of police militarization pick up Radley Balko’s Rise of the Warrior Cop. There are so many tiny little towns with fully kitted out SWAT teams. Cops are taught to view themselves as soldiers in hostile territory. They go to trainings where they’re taught bullshit science to encourage them to kill.

16

They are soldiers in hostile territory. They're occupying indigenous land. Killing a cop isn't murder, it's warfare according to the proper rules of engagement.

2
lemmy.world

Not even in Dallas. But hey, at least some small town got to employ people to build this tank, and not call it socialism.

14
Voroxpetereply
sh.itjust.works

The "tank" was gonna be built either way. These items are purchased through a program that allows the military to sell off surplus equipment to law enforcement. So, basically, it's a way of subsidizing the v already insane US military budget with money drawn from municipal and state taxes, while getting military hardware into the hands of cops.

11

I think law enforcement is lacking long range potential and will need HIMAS equipment as well.

4

What makes this even better is the military hated these things. They were forced on them and completely changed the way the military had to operate. Now the police want more of them. The big change? Being able to effectively engage with the local population. Why is our military more concerned with that than the police?

2

It's even stupider than that.

It's either military surplus or reconditioned units that are offered for resale to stateside PD's to "pacify" civilian unrest.

3
lemmy.world

It depends through which glasses you look.

For them every black person, LGBTQ person and woman who wants to own their own body by having an abortion is a criminal. And according to right wing extremist propaganda the leftists are extremely dangerous, so I guess that would justify the purchase of military equipment.

Do you have any idea how deadly woke people are? Every time someone shouts "black lives matter" a white Karen's feelings are hurt. The only way to combat this is assault rifles and infantry vehicles.

8
Soulgreply
sh.itjust.works

I get the sentiment but this kind of hyperbole helps nobody

0

Those pigs aren't helping anyone either. I'm just being sarcastic because that's basically the only response I can think of when reading things like this. It's a fucking disgrace. It's like people want to live in a dystopian shit show so bad, they don't know how fast to dig their own grave. It's fucking embarrassing. Yeah, awesome, let's go for extremism and get a militarized police state, because that never went wrong. Extremism always solves all our fucking problems.

2
EatATacoreply
lemm.ee

Wait...you think that if someone gets murdered, but they don't arrest anyone, this doesn't go into the crime rate?

1
lemmy.world

You man someone had an accident? This is a safe place to live, we've never had anything like that happen here.

4
lemmy.world

Do you think cops who are buying that sort of shit are reluctant to arrest people?

-2

Common for agencies to have internal ticket and arrest quotas for their officers and to promote based on number of arrests by officer.

Consequentially, a change in the quota can result in a "crime wave" as the number of arrests rise. It is not uncommon for surges in arrests to occur during campaign season, as police departments lobby for bigger budgets and more manpower.

3

Now check the stats for crimes involving IUDs (or IEDs)

4

Very normal for suburbs (particularly white suburbs adjacent to black urban neighborhoods) to act like they're living in a war zone, because they saw a guy in a durag smoking a scary cigarette outside of the gym.

4

I recently lived in Denton and frequently traveled to Prosper for various reasons.

It's a little rich person town in the middle of nowhere. They definitely don't need this.

2

Police don't but they often want a vehicle for SWAT related reasons, but SWAT trucks costs hundreds of thousands. Meanwhile MRAPs are "free".

Prosper, Texas is home to 40,000 people. In 2010 their population was under 10k. They have quadrupled in size and are near the DFW area, so it's not really a surprise they took the 1033 offer for an MRAP. That said most of these decom'd heaps of shit are loathesomely expensive. "High Cost of Free MRAPs" by Strongtowns. Most MRAPs being given out are first and second gen versions. And for those first gens, they got sent to the front lines of the GWOT and got beat to shit while newer ones were tested and approved. These old models they're "giving out for free" have tire drum parts never used on later versions, transmissions like that of an F650 with half the reliability, and are ticking time bombs of use. Most cities often estimate maintenance costs at $5k per year, until something actually breaks and they have to get a second MRAP to cannibalize to fix the first. (Hint - that's why you often see them picked up in pairs or more)

That's before the optics. Petaluma, California has one and the police chief has even said "yeah it kinda has some bad optics sending police around in a former war machine".

If your city is wanting to pick one up, it's because someone who has zero experience with them really likes the idea of a big scary diesel monster rolling up on drug houses, and hasn't actually considered that if they can't pony up thousands of tax dollars every 6 months to keep the moneymonster fed, the only place it's gonna drive is into a storage shed.

Edit: I should add that these vehicles are incredibly versatile and aren't necessarily a bad thing for municipalities. With their ride height, sheer bulk, and high torque engines, Fire and rescue could probably make great use them in several cities. They make fantastic road clearing vehicles in the event of large accidents needing to move to the side of the road, or pushing debris out of the way. Additionally in flood prone areas they make very good rescue vehicles due to their ride height and "crew space" inside. They DO have value outside of terrorizing civilian populations, just that that's all PDs will use them for.

42

It's Texas, you never know when someone might be in danger of wanting to have some level of control over their own body.

28

It’s just so damn full of fossil fuel, it’s bursting at the seams.

6

You know that thing has gotta be a hangar queen that measures efficiency in gallons per mile. I guess the towncs educators are gonna have to tighten their belts some more.

0
lemmy.world

This is probably more dangerous for them then a normal car. The features that make a MRAP good at surviving an IED also make them top heavy and easy to roll. I'm fairly sure they are more likely to have a reckless driver behind the wheel then have a roadside bomb.

31
lemmy.world

I have a feeling this will sit in a garage most days. It will only come out for July 4th parades and to drive through some brown persons house "accidentally" during a welfare check.

18

It will only come out for July 4th parades and to drive through some brown persons house “accidentally” during a welfare check.

Don't forget about running over protesters. Way better than your average SUV.

https://youtu.be/vBz2tE7d-iQ

8

Yup. Have fun driving to that emergency at (checks notes) 35 mph.

2
lemmy.world

"Yippy Dippy Doooo!!!! We can hide in here as the kids get killed in Uvalde!!!!" - Texas Cops

29
Empricornreply
feddit.nl

I think I get where you're going with this, but law enforcement isn't hired by the public, except maybe the Sheriff, depending on where you are...

2

All the electable positions that were involved were re-elected.

2
lemmy.world

Iud's are baby killers. They stop cop sperm from impregnating their victims.

27

The female body just has a way of shutting impregnation down in the case of cop rape. Its in the Bible.

3
lemm.ee

OBVIOUSLY it's so that next time there's a SCHOOL SHOOTING they can rock up in STYLE while they wait for the Shooter to run out of Bullets or Bodies whichever happens first!

27

After they take 40 minutes to go a 5 minute drive in this thing... Next time the excuse will be, "our equipment wasn't there yet!"

1
midwest.social

I've never wanted to blow something up so bad in my life. I mean, I don't want anyone to get hurt and I wouldnt actually do this since its stupid, but the desire is very strong.

25
HessiaNerdreply
lemmy.world

I believe it's one part gas to one part oil. I could check with my mixologist friend. He made a lot of cocktails during the winter on fire.

6

I've always subscribed to the styrofoam dissolved in gasoline until no more can be dissolved school of cocktail mixing

4

Well, give a man a match, he'll be warm for a moment. Set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

1

If you need this type of vehicle as police, you're the issue, not the people around.

22
reddthat.com

My extremely rural county of 60k population has one for some reason. The best part is, the one time there was actually an armed and dangerous individual on the run, they called in aid from a major city an hour away. They did however parade around with it and strongly consider actually pulling at the tractor pull with it

17

It's absolutely wannabe soldier types being jealous of the military toys and begging to have have them paid for by the cities.

You don't look to your neighbor anymore to keep up with the Jones' you now know of and look at hyper specialized interests and tools.

Similar to how people have entire production centers in their houses revolving around resin crafting and 3D printing. Now everyone can get the cancer they were so jealous of.

Definitely bad in this case.

1

My extremely rural county of 60k population has one for some reason.

The reason is that it's decommissioned from the military and police forces get a massive discount on buying equipment decommissioned from the military.

2

The fun thing is a lot of smaller departments find out after they get something like this, they can't afford to actually use or maintain them. Shit be expensive yo.

17
lemmy.world

Sitting in it while a school shooter blasts some kids.

14
Sam_Bassreply
lemmy.world

Unless they come equipped with cameras around their perimeters, anyone could sneak up to one and plant a couple bricks of semtex with remote detonators in strategic places and that safety gets real sketchy

2
Maggotyreply
lemmy.world

I would not recommend trying that. Instead just dig a ditch across where they'd have to drive this thing. And keep the area around the ditch muddy. And suddenly it's a stationary gun emplacement.

2
Maggotyreply
lemmy.world

More than sourcing the exact right kind of explosives to breach the armor without the FBI knowing?

Also, obligatory hello to the NSA who's reading this right now.

2

Since i do not and cannot source semtex, i couldnt tell how long it would take to set it up. I can only speculate using the basic mechanical knowledge ive gained from 40+ years in the workforce and compare those timings with the physics required to rig up such things. Tl;dr: Just guessing

1

I mean, in any revolution within the US, it would be cops trying to play soldier vs the citizens in the initial moves.

Folks like to think the army, or the marines are what we would be fighting. Maybe eventually, after things get far enough along, but the first steps in seizing control is removing the police because they're the ones that will be guarding property and responding to attacks against politicians and/or oligarchs.

Of course the cops want to play soldier. There's enough of them in place because they're infiltrators from extremist groups. Often the most rabid racist groups. It's no secret at all that their plan is to be in place to seize control themselves.

I don't buy into the literal acab bullshit, only the systemic version. But that system is bad, and part of what's making it worse is this kind of thing. Those assholes right there? Those are the guys you'll want to be watching if shit gets real.

11
chiliedoggreply
lemmy.world

Which is funny because part of the reason to have civilian police is that they don't report to the military and ideally would side with the civilians against a tyrannical government.

5

Funnily enough, cops would probably not know a tyrannical government until it knocked on down their door.

4

well we know texas hates birth control. now they can obliterate it with superior force

11

Wait! You're saying that your police department doesn't get blown up by multiple IEDs every week? How odd.

::: spoiler :::

11
lemmy.ca

Yeah, it would seem that the reason they own this is so that they can block the fire lane.

I'm not sure that thing has enough fuel to get out of the fire lane.

2
jaybonereply
lemmy.world

They’re gonna say they’re allowed to park there for emergency purposes. But taking dick pics with your buddies is not an emergency.

1
lemmy.world

Not only is it ridiculous and likely unnecessary, but also consider they'll need to budget maintenance costs for this.

9

They get to be abhorrently expensive. Newark NJ got 2 Vietnam era helicopters (one for parts only) and in 5 years spent 1.13 million just keeping it around to fly for 4 hours every other Friday/Saturday.

Decom stuff is a maintenance moneypit

7
lemm.ee

Don't worry. They'll take it out of the budget they don't use to pay for lawsuits.

2

Who needs an education budget? Just let more kids get killed and the cops can take it all.

1

They're not compensating for something; they're compensating for everything.

8

Since nobody has offered te correct answer, I will:
It’s because increasingly so, the enemy is becoming you.

8

The only thing that can stop a bad guy with an MRAP, is a good guy with an MRAP.

Now if only we could find some bad guys with an MRAP...

7
lemmynsfw.com

No, they said what they said. IUD, Illegal Unwanted Darkskins

/s because that's way too fucking plausible, fuck me I think I need to wash my soul

12

I think they meant IUD as in intrauterine device, because this is Texas and women are supposed to give birth, not avoid pregnancy

4

play on words
noun
A pun, or similar humorous use of language such as a double entendre.

:)

0

this is needed and justified to compensate for small brains and small penises

5
lemmy.world

The ONLY reason you'd need something like this is maybe hurricane prone areas to get around flooded parts of the city

5

Where i live it's awfully common to use large vehicles like this to rescue people in flood waters. They have boats too for the deeper sections but trucks like this can roll through a neighborhood nonstop to search and rescue people.

1

But don't you see it makes perfect sense? Now they can wait outside schools with an active shooter in safety! Wouldn't want any officers getting hurt when children are getting shot now would we?

4

I WANNA PLAY WITH THE MRAP!! But I'd... Like maybe not run over brown people with it, and instead use it as a force for good...?

Edit: or just fun.

2

Good morning, I hate America and wish for its total annihilation.

2

Uh, sure. The police should walk around on pointe shoes, in pink ballet tutus and with bouquets of fresh flowers.

-7
lemm.ee

Storing it 10 hours north of the border (assuming it can reach highway speeds and only needs to stop for gas twice) might not be the strategic move you think it is

15
sopuli.xyz

So either keep it safe and too far away to be useful or keep it where its useful but will get stolen? Might as well not have one then

10
lemmy.world

They would probably fly in some military defense first. The local law enforcement and other state law enforcement would mostly likely just provide reinforcement to their effort. Here’s hoping Claudia can keep the cartels in check, right?

-9

So you're saying the cartels are already in Texas but this exists in case they ever cross the border into Texas?

4
Paprikareply
lemmy.cafe

This is one of the funniest things I've ever read. Also one of the dumbest things I've ever read coincidentally. But funny!

4
Dasusreply
lemmy.world

Americans genuinely don't understand the difference between police and the military rofl

4
lemmy.world

Yeah, I’m sure you attended police academy, or served in the military, right? If you had, one of the first things they would tell you is to not have social media.

-1
Dasusreply
lemmy.world

served in the military, right?

I did, yeah. About 75% of males around here do, nothing special about it. Also, while we do it we genuinely get better training in the use of force than most American police.

And yes, they do talk about the responsibility of what you share. When I was in the army, not so much, as social media wasn't really a thing yet and phone cameras weren't much of thing. My brother, though, went a few years after, they covered it in much more detail.

Edit technically I'm still in the army, as I'm in the reserves.

2
Dasusreply
lemmy.world

Like they do more than 90% of males here. ~7% go to civil service.

"Lucky you". You Americans and your military fetishes. Exactly what's the problem here, preventing you from discerning your police from your military or even really knowing the difference.

2
lemmy.world

Oh, so you aren’t even American? You don’t live in America. So what is your problem with police in Texas? This post specifically addresses police in Texas and the new vehicles they received.

-1

"You're not even American, and think you have the right to laugh at the American military-industrial complex?!"

What's wrong with an overmilitarised and undereducated police force...?

What's wrong with people genuinely not being able to name the difference in roles between the military and the police?

We can figure this out together, I'm sure.

2