There can be more than one idiot in a given situation

That's exactly what an idiot would say!! grips tinfoil hat more tightly

There's a post from a developer who works on Firefox linked in the comments of that article that suggests this fingerprinting vector has been known and responded to by other major browsers as well:

https://ritter.vg/blog-webaudio_alibaba.html

Yeah, if I were to attempt these, I'd precook the ground beef so I could drain it appropriately, then try to assemble and finish the pepperoni and cheese under like a low broil. But I'd cook the beef itself relatively unseasoned in the hopes that either mixing it with pizza sauce or layering pizza sauce between the beef and cheese would tie everything together flavor-wise.

I'd also skip the pepperoni entirely because it gives me nightmarish heartburn, but that's neither here nor there.

My mother (who is cis) was a landscaper for most of her career, and the fact that she was more jacked than anyone else in the family because of it was always a genuine point of pride. It didn't stop her from looking good in a dress either (although occasions she felt like fully dressing up for were few and far between.)

My point being, even if your muscles were to stay looking the way they are in this picture, I think that's perfectly okay. Strength is absolutely not exclusive to any gender, and having muscle definition doesn't make you less of a woman. But for the record, I do think your muscles will become less prominent with time. Give it five years. If you are less than a year into your transition now, that's hardly any time at all (even though I am sure there are so many other ways where it is also, equally validly, feeling like a really long time!)

DOJ is really going at it lately.

I can't wait to hear about the outcome of this litigation in 20-25 years.

I can't believe this isn't satire. I hope these incompetent fuckers get sued into bankruptcy

1. I don't intend to victim blame or defend any abusers here; this shit is vile and should not be tolerated, period.

2. From the below, it sounds like it was determined that, despite Omegle's moderation efforts, Omegle could have done better in areas relating to age verification and matchmaking. So I'm not trying to defend or minimize Omegle's role either, I don't know the details of how the site worked but it sounds like this was a problem for a long time:

the judge in A.M.’s case found last July that Omegle’s design was at fault and it was not protected by Section 230: It could have worked to prevent matches between minors and adults before sexual content was even sent, the judge said.

1. However, I really don't like the choice of phrasing "forced", and I wonder whether that's poor paraphrasing or actually taken from the lawsuit.

Her lawsuit, filed in 2021, alleged that she met a man in his thirties on Omegle who forced her to take naked photos and videos over a three-year period. She was just 11 when it began in 2014.

Again, to be clear, not trying to say that the victim should, or even could, have done anything differently. Victim blaming is bad. But how the hell are they saying "forced" to do something by some scumbag over the internet? What kind of conditions does a kid have to be in at home to feel like they can't turn to their parent/guardian for help in a terrifying situation like that? How is an 11-year-old in 2014 being allowed to get into that situation in the first place, between her parents and her school?

It seems like this victim was failed by every support system she should have been able to rely on. This is so messed up. This is exactly why we need things like sex education and Internet safety education.

we shouldn't have records systems not subject to FOIA

You're probably right in the first half, but I wouldn't be too surprised if interactions between voice assistants are special cases that are accounted for by the programmers as a little bit of an Easter egg

Are we gonna gloss over the fact that the EEOC was storing plaintext passwords? Fucking incompetent

Autocomplete suggestion getting "February" wrong is a nice touch

Please be advised, this is an article about a Tucker Carlson segment which doesn't provide any additional info or context of its own

wish kamala's campaign would run some attack ads about how the Republican speaker is refusing to provide hurricane relief to Republican states

Probably more of a "Do x, y, and z and we agree not to sue you about it"

It's real dangerous to look at someone seeking legal representation and take that as an implication of guilt.

Not defending Mr Beast at all, I'm sure there is no shortage of actual evidence of wrongdoing

I hope you replied "you're next."

When the alarm goes off in your building... you evacuate. Doesn't matter if it's a test or not.

that's his left leg crossed over his right

Finally, some good fucking legislation

If we get pissed off enough as a country we can make this happen