Also they are addicted to sycophancy. Now that they have a convincing yes man in their pockets they are uniquely vulnerable to AI psychosis.

Yeah same. Once I visited Niagara falls with my bro and we were kind of into poker at the time so we each took 100$ and went to the casino. Got fleeced by a texan looking old guy with a cowboy hat then we went back to our hotel lol. I have many vices but apparently gambling isn't one of them.

I find it interesting because it forces lots of people to think at least superficially about how they would define consciousness and its boundaries.

Does it need a substrate? Does the substrate need to be constantly active? Does it need to be organic? Does it need to be able to do high level computation and thinking? Any answer you may give is unfalsifiable so it's not like it's a scientific subject anyway. It's all vibes.

I like that it gives anyone the opportunity to wrestle with some hardcore metaphysics.

I think it's always fine to use AI stuff as intermediary material, but almost never as finished product unless you specifically need something that feels samey and average.

For world building it's pretty cool cause you can finally visualize that city that you've spent time imagining in detail, and use that to sharpen your description of it or spot incongruities. And for writing in general there's nothing wrong with story boarding scenes and characters to ground your writing if you have more of a visual mind. Anything that helps you on your specific craft without bogging down the quality of the finished piece.

Yes but there is no reason to think that they wouldn't fall roughly in the same distribution.

Yes. A virus wouldn't pop a cmd, it has way better methods to gain privilege.

It's typical of dev burnout, though. Communication starts becoming more impulsive and less constructive, especially in the face of conflicts of opinions.

I've seen it play a few times already. A toxic community will take a dev who's already struggling, troll them, screenshot their problematic responses, and use that in a campaign across relevant places such as github, reddit, lemmy... Maybe add a little light harassment on the side, as a treat. It's a fun activity ! The dev spirals, posts increasingly unhinged responses and often quits as a result.

The fact that the thread is titled "is lutris slop now" is a clear indication that the intention of the poster wasn't to contribute anything constructive but to attack the dev and put them on their back foot.

Oh great the campaign of harassment is continuing. Keep going guys, hopefully you can get another dev to quit a project, and I know none of the people commenting here have what it takes to fork and maintain it.

You wouldn't be doing anything different if you were getting paid by corporate interests to hurt the open source movement. Great job you can be proud of yourselves.

Dude, we work for the same company and I could have typed that in, and maybe I did. I wanted your experience with it, that’s why I asked you.

To me it's like sending the "let me google that for you" link to answer a question. It's just bad form. I don't want your whole reasoning trace man, i just want to know what you understand of it and maybe you'll catch some detail i'm missing or whatever. It's simple, i won't read LLM output, my colleagues know it and i get shit for it but no i am not digesting this material for you. Give me a 3 bullet-point version in your own words, the point is not just in the data exchange it's also to make sure you are aware of the answer and we have a common truth.

Or failing that, just give me the fucking prompt and at least i'll know if you understand the question.

I hate the "Random industry is cooked" trope. Right now if you go on LinkedIn you'll find a ton of bros proclaiming the death of Hollywood because Seedance can now generate 3 minutes of incoherent eye-candy with vaguely realistic looking special effects.

It's like brainrot for boomers, you can see they are getting absolutely hypnotized by the loud noises and bright colors, and totally missing that the main character who was running to the right with blue pants is now walking to the left with red shorts.

Yes, both threads are led by two accounts with probably less than 50 commits to their names during the last year, none of which are of any relevance to the subject they are discussing.

In a world where you could contribute your time to make some things better, there is a certain category of people who seek out nice things specifically to harm them. As open source enters mainstream culture, it also appears on the radar of this kind of people. It's dangerous to catch their attention, as once they have you they'll coordinate over reddit, lemmy, github, discord to ruin your reputation. The reputation of some guy who never ever did them any harm apart from bringing them something they needed, for free, but in a way that doesn't 100% satisfy them. Pure vicious entitlement.

I'd sooner have a drink with a salesman from OpenAI than with one of them.

Didn't you hear? Elon announced the total collapse of the baking industry within the next 6 months.

What's funny is they got into this mess solely by their own crass ignorance. I'm persuaded they thought it would be like Syria or other asymmetrical wars they fought. Well though luck dipshits, Iran is a whole other kind of beast.

They already shit their pants in Afghanistan despite it being literally nicknamed "the graveyard of empires". But Iran is not that, Iran is its own empire and has been for thousands of years. Good luck trying to get Elamites and Medes to bend the knee. You're not the first to try.

I think the issue is also that you need some serious hardware to get good inference speed when your devs are working, but then most of the time this hardware will be under utilized.

That being said you can get good performance from indie inference farms, at a fraction of the cost of the big US labs. I think it's a great compromise and in a few months the open models will be near parity with opus 4.6 which is really all you need for most tasks.

Yeah the role of the maintainer is to gatekeep the quality of the finished product. As long as they do that it's fine. The contributor could be a clanker or a junior trying to get their first PR, I don't care cause the person I trust is the maintainer.

Rsync's creator has been maintaining load bearing infra since before I learned to code, if you can't trust them who can you trust?

Once I was driving home on the highway and Google maps suggested I get off at the next exit. Sometimes there's heavy traffic at the entrance of my city so I figured it would make me save a few minutes by approaching from another angle.

Nope, it made me take the exit, drive a kilometer in a dead end then turn a roundabout, drive back and enter the highway exactly where I exited it.

Reverse baiting is a thing though. I do it all the time on LinkedIn. Read a boomer's post complaining about taxes, accuse them of being part of a whiny generation that doesn't know anything about hard work. It's hilarious.

Yeah same. I'd like to think i'd answer "I'll use AI, if you don't like it you can fork the project and i wish you good luck. Go share your opinion on AI in an appropriate place.". But realistically there's a high chance it catches me on a bad day and i get stupid.

But where will the maintainers for these alternatives come from, when barely anybody has stepped up in the 30 years of rsync's existence? Your comment implies that tridge didn't call for help before, which is far from the truth.

This is thankless maintenance on critical software, not some *-arr toy project for hobbyist self-hosters.

That's bullshit. Almost all meta hires are poached, and they're not coming for you if you're not in a position to make good money.

The vast majority of these people chose to leave an already cushy job to get in there.