I read the website. I notice it doesn't actually.. say anything about the event at all? It's just a list of a few logical fallacies that exist.

Go read the wikipedia article on the protests and see if you disagree with the 'trolls' after all.

Have you done the most basic thing and read the wikipedia article? Is that "denial" too?

??? Why is it so crazy to imagine people let a tap run for two minutes?

uBlock Origin + NoScript + Toggle referrer (+ SponsorBlock for YT).

NoScript can be a pain to manage occasionally but even on pemit-all-by-default mode you can block some of the more ubiquitous insidious trackers like Google and Facebook without impacting your functionality at all.

I have both. I avoid using my phone for anything as much as possible. Even just general internet browsing is an absolutely chore on the phone, I've never understood the popularity.

Well, exactly.

Do you not agree it's a bit silly to suggest mocking people for their view of an issue, when you don't know the basic facts of said issue? If I found myself doing that, I'd personally be a bit concerned about what I am choosing mock.

I was taught that in high school. Turns out, it's just not true.

Great, then welcome, you agree with the rest of us.

Oh hey! It's the guy who thinks posting videos of Uyghurs is how you dunk on Hexbear, without even knowing what Xinjiang is. Then, without a shred of irony, accuses Hexbear of not critically thinking :o

You might genuinely want to consider how that behaviour is incredibly 'echo chamber'y. Repeating an opinion without knowing the first thing about the actual facts?

Where I come from doesn't matter, the content of my arguments do. At least that's what your website would vaguely imply.

I agree with the overall sentiment, but some of these mentions are not accurate and imo devalues the importance of such important accusations (e.g. since when was NK genociding anyone?)

Evidence? Beyond "A guy said that a guy said that.."

Because they're awful methods of communication that lead to bad community feel? Seems straight forward to me.

??? "Keeping people from voting is literally the only way Republicans can stay in office" is just such an objectively false statement I don't know where to start.

The totality of evidence for this is "a drone stopped working for a bit". It's just baseless waffle.