There isn't any open source solution possible if AI models are beholden to copyright laws.

This is advocating for a world where only a handful of companies would be able to train AI models, and the rest of us would become their pets as we move towards an AI driven society.

The artist and writers already lost, there is no going back. Now we see if we all win together or if only google, openai, shutterstock, Adobe, stack overflow, github and reddit win since they are the only ones with the data or able to pay for it.

I think it's fine, even more so if you name who the original author is. I already created two clone subs and I plan on boosting them with a lot of stolen content from a bit everywhere until people join, if they do.

That being said, I'm new.

China didn't take your job and neither will AI. Corporations will replace you for something that cost less.

We can't really legislate against AI because other countries won't. Its also a huge boon for society, we just have to make sure the profits are redistributed and work hours overall are reduced instead of all the productivity gain going into the pockets of the mega wealthy

The original author's name was deleted. It's a good one too, shame that i can't attribute it.

Original author: QuasarIR

Thank you for taking on the responsibility, the little background info does inspire confidence. Very cool.

I kind of preferred the rules as they were. This is kind of a wall of text, hard to parse and will probably mostly go unread.

I think keeping the old and just adding the anti bot rule and attribution rule is fine. Just saying attribution must be kept on the image frame if possible is enough. I think bumping up the 2 limit per day max is alright but 5 might be a lot. Quality over quantity and all that.

I'm really against any kind of heavy handedness for raunchy comics, especially if it's about the joke and not the image itself. Having people tag the NSFW stuff (ie actual nudity, sexual content, dildos, etc) is fine imo.

For violence, I mean, we are all adults here and it's cartoon violence in any case. It just feels a bit puritanical to be hard on this kind of stuff. It doesn't really feel like a problem.

Sorry if this is overly critical. Thanks for the help!

Crows laying traps for other birds would be wild. Survival books sometimes talk about laying snares for birds in trees using wire.

The shadow part is usually implied, I'm surprised to see it actually written

It's this one, although I can't find the original, only the reaction to it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYub79GEcFw

"They've built a library of small building blocks for character movements. These blocks can be combined in various ways to create a wide range of animations."

That's what they patented. Their animations a tiny bit more modular. The patent and copyright system is literally only their to fuck us.

Original author: CottenballVonDot

Go to the press, make it public. They will only hurt you to silence you, once it's out there, it's too late. The press would love this story too

This community revolves around two sentence horrors, stories where the first sentence typically takes on an other far darker meaning once the second sentence is read.

Its very common for these types of stories to explore difficult content like murder, suicide, conjugal violence, etc so it's natural that some of them would gravitate to the worst horror of all time.

I think it's a very big mistake to turn the holocaust into a taboo that can't be mentioned. I wouldn't call Schindler's list or The Book Thief antisemitic, I wouldn't label this story like that either. I believe it's okay to explore what happened through popular mediums.

There's really nothing humourous about it and it doesn't make light of it at all imo.

Dalle2 was always kind of shit tbh.

Nothing beats chat gpt and gpt4 currently, but meta just released llama v2 which is now the best open source base model. V2 is literally only a day old but im sure we will get something that rivals ChatGtp very soon as it gets fine tuned by the community

Really love the last bit with the "which way the number is ticking", it really gets you thinking about just how big the number is. Interesting twist.

He fell off the boat. He's hearing the party music go further and further as he starts to drown.

Building a carless society will take time but we need to get rid of gas right now. The difference of emission for the use and manufacturing of an EV is absolutely not close to the cost of use and manufacturing of an ice vehicle PLUS literally burning gallons just to move it.

Oil companies, their assets and the assets of the barons who own them should be violently seized and used to offset the cost of what they created. Until that happens, we will have to suffer a bit or we will be stuck suffering so much more probably sooner than we think.

The ask_____ format is good because it's easy to find and jump to it's sister communities like ask historians and ask electricians, etc

Original author: Slacking (Came up with this one myself!)