Corporations pretend to the public that their business is providing services when in reality their business is making profit. Corporations are just starting to realise AI research has pulled a similar switch on them, it pretended to be in the business of making profit but actually its business was something else, something about switching the means of production.

Heat tsunami?

Cost won't probably be a true limiting factor but will just be used to rationalise restricted distribution.

He is a war leader and will do what he must do to lessen the unspeakable horror being done to those he leads.

I do not think it is certain China would apply it universally, a totalitarian government views its population as an enemy to be controlled. The most likely scenario is that until machines can take over production the general population would be encouraged to reproduce but no longevity treatment given, with it being forbidden to discuss the fact that the ruling elite does not age. The reason the treatment would be denied in the East and the West is that significantly increased lifespan inevitably increases experience which itself increases the likelihood of revolt against subjugation. All governments are in the business of management and not the business of improving the lot of their population, talk of improvement is just one of its methods of control. The only improvement that is permitted is technological advancements in production and surveillance.

I once woke up from a nap that overtook me and it was twilight and I didn't know if it was ten on a summer evening or seven in the morning in the middle of winter.

If you think the large social media platforms are in the business of public service I have a bridge I can sell you.

Our entire cultural infrastructure is there to deny we are meat and that we will rot but we are meat and we will rot and therein lies all of the unrest.

The machine beeps when the software cycle completes but often the mechanical process termination lags behind this due most commonly to sunspots. Happy now.

My problem whenever I see this argument is how do you know this is not what human minds are doing, that we just aggregate opinions and seem convincing. The benefit of the doubt we give to other humans is that if it convincingly seems like they are thinking then we are convinced.

All threats are a grift by people that believe they cannot win fairly.

Before it came if you couldn't see this one coming then frankly you had it coming.

I tried to make that exact argument when I was buying a hammer from Homebase but they said fading into the background of an observing consciousness is not the same as merging into a single entity with it.

I wonder if their take on human history is that the only consequences of interfering with complex natural systems are those that were intended.

Good cop, bad cop.

Any subject, like political science or social science, that includes the word science in its name is probably trying to convince itself as much as you.

You mean that thing everyone knew about since the authorities derailed open-source TrueCrypt and forced them to message their users that they should migrate to BitLocker?

I will NOT comprehend basic science.

Is this update planned to extend all the way up the food chain to executive offices, rhetorical question of course. We all know the answer.

Dynamic pricing nudges the price to the maximum a customer can afford which temporarily maximises profits but creates in the mind of the customer a feeling of being relentlessly over charged and eventually and long-term they won't come back.