Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on piefed.social

11 replies

JLD
lemmy.zip

I spent months speaking up against this, and I learned something sad: nobody cares. So now the way I think about it is that apathy leads to its own punishment. It’s depressing.

28

I feel like the average person is too obsessed with convenience and/or not smart enough to draw certain technologies to their logical conclusions. At least you'll be able to say "yeah I warned you about that 10 years ago".

17
piefed.social

I suspect that the 'apathy' thing might be more complex than appears on the surface. For example, there might be a certain amount of mental self-protection going on there, even though that probably sounds paradoxical in terms of taking vital action against a future surveillance state.

9
JLDreply
lemmy.zip

I understand, but now I am the one protecting my mental health. I won't be a proxy anymore. Instead I'll take out my popcorn and watch the collapse.

3

Sick of warning everyone who won’t listen.

welcome to the club. lol

my version is w politics and apathy ABSOLUTELY is the main driver, but like @[email protected] i'm not a marxist so popcorning it is an option to me too; but unfortunately my familiarity with marxism makes me aware it's going to bite me in the ass like it will my neighbor.

2
lemmy.world

From the article:

Key findings

  • In both democratic and authoritarian contexts, technologies are being deployed in ways that erode, and in some cases effectively dismantle, human rights.
  • Technology use risks facilitating or amplifying repressive practices and systems, and becoming an instrument of authoritarian governance.
  • Surveillance technologies are being expanded and entrenched with the purpose of exerting control over entire populations and/or specific groups of people such as journalists and human rights defenders.
  • The authoritarian use of technology is ultimately having a ‘chilling effect’.
  • Some technologies are disproportionately intrusive by design and should not be used.
  • Technologies’ use is often incompatible with the rule of law, lack redress and raise mass impunity risks.
  • A lack of transparency facilitates the authoritarian use of technologies.
24

both democratic and authoritarian contexts

ha, how do we tell them?

7
lemmy.ml

Advocating for privacy without class consciousness ultimately leads to nothing.

10

pretty much why things are getting worse on this front.

2

You reached the end

Global Report on the Authoritarian use of Technology | Spyke