Spyke
piefed.ca

a failure so spectacular, it lead to fdr, the new deal..... republicans wouldn't win the white house back until 1952.

179
lemmy.world

And only 6 years after they finally got the Whitehouse again, they started plotting for the next massive fuck up era by founding the John Birch Society (which is a major cause for the GOP's current psychosis.

112
adarzareply
piefed.ca

that wasn't ike, though. those nutcases thought he was a commie.

28
lemmy.world

Yeah, I agree. As conservatives go Ike was pretty reasonable.

My point was that almost as soon as the party got the Whitehouse again, influential portions of it started to plot for the next Great Depression like catastrophy.

As an ideological movement, they've proved many times that they cannot be trusted with power.

23

The rich people made a lot of money from the last Great Depression, I bet that's what they're hoping for again.

15

Don't forget about the McCarthyism of the late 40s and the 50s. Ronald Reagan was involved with that particular movement since the beginning when he testified in front of Congress (specifically the House Un-American Activities Committee) saying that communists were taking over Hollywood.

19

well I meant the part about Republicans not getting the house for a long time lol

4

A quarter of the trans population in the US has already been displaced due to the new Republican Jim Crow laws.

2
Spezireply
feddit.org

The world cup reminds me of the 1936 Berlin Olympics.

4

200 million deaths later, in the 1950s... worth it, said the world?

Surely we learned from our mistakes?

2
lemmy.world

Yeah but the Democrats were competent back then. I don't have confidence in most of the modern Democrats. There are only like 3 of them who seem to get what's going on

18

A lot of that comes from the development of corporate lobbyists and special interest groups in the 1970s. Even then they were highly regulated, and oversized campaign contributions still counted as bribes. That all changed after Reagan got into office, and Gucci Gulch got unfettered access to elected officials. After that, a lot of politicians were too tempted by the prospect of getting fantastically wealthy and forgot about the dream of changing the world for the better.

A lot of this isn't really new. To quote Rutherford B. Hayes, The real difficulty is with the vast wealth and power in the hands of the few and the unscrupulous who represent or control capital. Hundreds of laws of Congress and the state legislatures are in the interest of these men and against the interests of workingmen. These need to be exposed and repealed. All laws on corporations, on taxation, on trusts, wills, descent, and the like, need examination and extensive change. This is a government of the people, by the people, and for the people no longer. It is a government of corporations, by corporations, and for corporations.

So the influence of wealth and corporate interest on political power is, in fact, an old problem. What frustrates me is how reforms could have been made during their rare collective moments of conscience, and they didn't. To be fair, civil liberties of non-whites and women were a higher priority.

5
piefed.ca

In their view the Great Depression was probably started by a bunch of lazy woke activists who didn't want to work, thus spurring the dust bowl with their uh, inaction. Dust everywhere. No one dusting.

85
piefed.social

It's what Republican's do best; fuck up the economy.

78

Conservatives are – and have always been – the enemy of the people.

57
Mulligrubsreply
lemmy.world

In response to 2008 we didn't actually fix anything, bail outs just postpone the inevitable.

11

The New Deal didn't fix things, but kicked the can down the line as well. Anything to prevent us from giving up on capitalism.

I think Techno-feudalism may push us over the line. < Bolshevik chorus swells >

5

Just harder to get a mortgage, but way easier to get a car loan.

2

2008 was "just" a recession. A depression is much, much worse

8
sh.itjust.works

We have an extremely stable, rational market where share prices are based solely on tangible business value and not at all artificially inflated due to completely unrealistic goals and investor greed.

...I'm sorry. I can't even type this with a straight face.

18

What is this Artificial Inflation? I've seen no such thing.

3
lemmy.world

Allowing presidents to pick your justices and then giving them jobs for life is the stupidest system ever created. Ripe for abuse.

36

What so bizarre is SCOTUS has always been conservative. We get a couple of judges who are not hardcore conservatives and they help make a couple of rulings that aren't just one sided conservative nonsense and suddenly "they are taking over the judiciary with activist judges".

So the conservatives do exactly this, they start stacking their already suck ass conservative courts that always rule for big business with even more extreme ideological fucktards. Every accusation is a confession I suppose.

12

They have to get approved by our Congress too it's just that they're also not doing their jobs well.

4

A country built on the back of genocide and slavery is the stupidest system ever created. Ripe for abuse.

1

I mean, that seems like that would be nice to have, at least for a bit...

6
lemmy.world

Knowing what happened in 1929 would require reading and thinking…

24

*knowing how to and/or being capable of reading and thinking

7

Hey, at least this time the republicans aren’t jerking off to nonsense tariffs, right?

22
Prathasreply
lemmy.zip

Interesting. I wonder how it was resolved given their lower medical knowledge...

2
lemmy.world

There is higher than 0% chance that DJT won't reach a deal with Iran "Soon", the possibility of oil crisis and economic recession are still very real.

13
megopiereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Right now, prices and availability are being kept semi stable by draw downs on strategic reserves, but that won’t last forever.

6
Pulsarreply
lemmy.world

$25 a gallon will cause a severe economic recession. I'm not sure I want a third "one in a lifetime recession"

2

ah yes, party like its the most recent '28. with a beer.

which was illegal at the time.

some kind of dog whistle?

11
spacegoatreply
lemmy.world

To oversimplify, the parties “switched” platforms in the 60s when Republicans realized that they could appeal to uneducated, racist white people.

16

The southern strategy was also kind of the major tactic the Democratic Party used to maintain the New Deal coalition. It essentially meant ignoring southern racism in favor of major infrastructure. Southern states just fucked over infrastructure projects where it served black people. It fell apart when, in the 1950s, the Democratic Party began to pursue racial rights.

*edit But it was Nixon and the GOP that coined it as a term I believe. It's a long standing strategy in American politics, though.

9

Essentially racism as a political platform developed by Nixon's campaign as a reactionary movement to the Civil Rights movement.

Jerry Falwell didn't want his whites-only college to be integrated by mandate, and started the Moral Majority, a voting bloc that didn't care how crooked a candidate was (or worked against their interests) so long as they were anti-abortion-access. And this helped Reagan win by a landslide in 1980.

And as many history analyses will show you, Reagan was the beginning of the end of the United States by an uncountable number of different metrics.

6
lemmy.world

I don't know how bad the US education is, but this is a fake post, right? Right?

8

Honestly? As someone educated in the US who has spent the last couple decades recovering from that education, it's a coin toss.

6
lemmy.ca

Remember when the Dems controlled all three bodies and for all that non stop hysterial talk about gun control what happened?.....crickets ..... no change. Why would anyone expect change from either side is always my question.

8
Dnbreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Sorry when was this that dems had filibuster proof control of house, senate and presidency for a while?

3

I’d rather take no change than chaos. What do you expect will happen?

1

I'm not a tankie, and I agree with "bOtH sIdEs SaMe" in regards to being pro-military, and pro-corporate, and anti-labor, for example.

Sure, they have some differences, too. But really not that many.

The major parties have another "sAmE"... they are both less than 30% of the voters now. Independents are now 40% of the voters (pick your poll, there are many). So... of course your party machine surrounds you with "both sides" disparagement and talking points.

Good, it's to be expected.

2

Also the law that froze the number of house seats (and this number of electrical college votes), screwing everything up and allowing both Bush and the pedo to "win" was passed in 1929.

It should be triple by now.

3

They have all this control but the only box these guys have ticked is removing some brown people from the country (who they are very likely never crossed paths with). Everything else is getting shitter for them, so what's to celebrate?

2
lemmy.zip

Trump will take office again in 1928 and then we can have second depression time!

1

Yeah take us back to the start of the great depression, such awesome rad times in America. Everyone was living high on the hog and business was booming!!!

1