Future
::: spoiler EDIT: A rough timeline of events here:
- In 2024, a user noticed this odd traffic on their local network, took a screenshot of the graph, and posted it to Twitter
- After discussing the issue with other Twitter users, the original poster realized that this graph was actually a mistake with their router or something. This reporting software was reporting some other device's network traffic as being the washing machine's traffic. The washing machine was actually only using a reasonable amount of data.
- Despite this past revelation, in 2026, someone put together a "meme" of sorts comparing the supposed events in that 2024 graph to what people in the past had predicted the future to be.
- For whatever reason, that "meme" was put through AI post-processing of some sort. Was the attempt to "upscale" this image after it had been passed around and been automatically compressed down by various platforms? Or was it someone using some newfangled AI-assisted compression technique in an attempt to create a smaller file size than any of the more traditional compression techniques? No idea. Whatever the reason was, the image was left with a bunch of nonsense text on the graph portion.
- I saw this "meme" and decided to share it here without scrutinizing the text on the graph. As mentioned in my first point, this graph was originally posted years ago, so I was already familiar with it and did not feel the need to read into it in the image I was sharing. I felt safe assuming it was just the same graph that I remember seeing years back.
- After users here called out the nonsense text, I just recreated the "meme" from scratch. I grabbed the original screenshot of the graph from Twitter and a stock photo of clouds, and then combined them along with some text so that this is more-or-less the same exact "meme", just without the AI gibberish. :::
1125
Comments184
1980: "I bet there will be flying cars in the future!"
2026: "Oh......nonononononono. That would be far too dangerous. Not after 9/11."
80: "9/11?"
26: "Yeah, they flew a bunch of planes into buildings, and blew up the pentagon, and the world trade center buildings, and an empty field in PA."
80: "Why would they blow up an empty field?"
26: "Because those men and women inside that plane are HEROS!"
80: "I don't understand....."
2020: "Hey guys!"
26: "Oh god! 1980, put this mask on. 2020 is here."
80: "I don't understand whats going on..."
20122016: "I just shot a gorilla, and altered the future!20 and 26: "FUCK OFF
20122016!!!"Harambe was in 2016, unless you're from the alternate timeline where the event actually happened in 2012.
Harambes demise was fortold by the Mayans.
........ok, either you somehow have the ability to alter google results before I search for them, or this is some Bearenstein Bears Bullshit!
I SWEAR it was in 2012.....wait, was Kony 2012 not in 2012? I remember them both happening in the same summer.
The world ending thanks to the mayans was 2012, harambre was the confirmation that the world ended in 2012
Me after 9/11/2001 seeing all the American flags being waved, reminiscent of Nazi Germany: "I sure hope this doesn't lead where it looks like it could lead..."
Later: "Fuck."
For what it's worth, my LG washer has sent 14.3 MB in the past MONTH, but my Unifi router has misidentified my Nvidia Shield TV as another LG washer. The Shield has downloaded 11.6 GB in the past month, mostly from YouTube. While I don't doubt it's possible for a washer to send/receive that much data if it's compromised and part of a botnet, I'd also question whether the device in question is actually an LG laundry appliance.
why do you even need to have your washer connected to the internet at all?
Knowing when the washer is done with a polite buzz on my wrist is way better than not hearing a beeper from 3 rooms away. It also reports your energy and water usage so you can learn about where you use resources.
There’s a lot to be gained from smart appliances, it’s just that our current system makes the manufacturers adversarial to the users unfortunately.
I just set a timer. As for knowing how much energy it uses: How much can you change once you know? You only get a few options on the machine to make any difference. Knowing this stuff is useful before you buy it, not after.
I wonder what happened to the capability of people to remember a time and read a watch.
I think you skipped the rest of the reply
If your washer and dryer are running for a fixed amount of time instead of monitoring the status of the clothes you are wasting valuable resources.
What status is there to observe in a washer? Loading weight and program are considered and a time is calculated at the start. And a dryer can work the time it needs. Standy by needs almost no energy, certainly less than fancy computational boards in "smart" stuff.
My washer also monitors soiling levels to decide how much water to dispense.
because those people don't think, they do what they are told by companies. there is ZERO logical reason to have the thing connected to the internet.
it won't add soap..it won't add clothes..it won't remove clothes...
there is nothing that machine can do better while connected to the internet vs offline...if there is, then it's a limitation/problem specifically designed to make the product worse, in order to manipulate people to sign up for stupid crap.
If you really don't think there's a legitimate reason someone might want their washer connected to the Internet, you need to get out more.
Have you considered that a washer might be in the basement? And the person might be 2 floors away where they can't hear it? And they might appreciate being able to get a notification when it is complete to remind them to move it to the dryer?
Open your mind a little more.
Have you considered that you could learn how long it takes to do a cycle and then set a timer on your phone?
That's more effort per wash instead of being something that only needs setting up one and then will work forever. Also, it's common for post-90s appliances to include sensors and vary the cycle time based on how dirty the water gets. Except for the data privacy and security concerns, which are mainly because it's proprietary software rather than inherent in Internet-connected devices, there's no advantage to using your phone timer over getting a notification.
It won't work forever. It'll stop working once they stop supporting the app or shut off the servers.
Again, that's specific to it being proprietary software. I've got some devices in my home that are connected to the local network (but not the internet), and have configured Home Assistant (which I've got running on an old desktop PC) to send a notification to my phone when it detects that those devices report that they're finished with what they do. That'll keep working until I turn off the Home Assistant server or replace the devices.
lol... more effort to set an alarm ve goes through the hassles of dealing with companies bullshit? yeah.. ok, totally more effort. I don't buy that for one second.. it's exhausting dealing with crappy software and companies that purposely tamper with their own products for profits
That's a proprietary software problem rather than a being connected to the internet problem. One of the send-a-notification-when-it's-done devices I set up took about as much effort as setting the right time on a phone alarm about ten times because the device's firmware was open source with no companies' bullshit involved, so all I had to do was navigate to the right page in Home Assistant and pick the right phone from a dropdown and the right even for the notification to trigger on from a dropdown. That's not wildly different from picking the right time from a dropdown on a phone.
Whether or not I can isn't relevant to whether I want to or not. My point is that you act like you can't conceive of why someone would want it that way. It's an absolutely narrow minded stance.
Or to start it late in the work day so you can throw it in the dryer when you get home without leaving clothes wet for 9 hours. Some may not understand why that matters, but some of us have fairly busy social lives and turning the active part of a load of laundry from 2 hours to three 5 minute increments that can be done at my convenience sounds really nice actually
Now, personally I'm unwilling to let my washer speak to the internet directly, but it is why if I had a house I'd look into something I can connect to my homeassistant setup without letting it speak to the internet directly
I think that you and I are roughly of the same temperament when it comes to what we expect of devices. But can you really imagine
that anyone might want to? Like getting an alert when their stuff is done?
My phone already does that because I set a timer on it cause I’ve done my laundry before and I know how long it takes to do a cycle.
"How long it takes to do a cycle" is dependent on the mode and settings you pick. Congrats on your streamlined existence, though.
Okay. Pick those settings and set a timer for how long they take. Streeeamlined.
yeah but s tying an alarm is hard.... apparently.
it's so much easier hooking the washing machine to the Internet, downloading the app, creating an account, remembering the password, updating firmware, getting constant notifications that Samsung has a sale on something you already bought, doing the firmware again because it failed, bricking your washing machine and waiting for AI to go all possible scenarios to fix it to then hear you need a new one.
I wouldn't mind being able to start my washer remotely - I want it to run while I'm not home because it's noisy, but I don't want the wet laundry to sit all day like it would if I started it and then went to work.
Doesn't practically every one have a delayed start option?
Or start it right before you leave. I swear, people in this thread are bending over backwards to try and justify having to connect appliances to the internet. It’s wild.
I mean, in a vacuum, a smart washer is a nice idea which is actually useful. Set the time to start the washer to 430 so it finishes when you get home. That's a good and useful improvement.
In practice however, gestures wildly there's the obvious data collection both of your laundry habits and anything the app on your phone can reach.
I'm not opposed to smart tech, but it has to actually benefit to product. A smart TV is a better TV (again, the data collection BS, but I am ignoring that for the moment). It can launch Netflix or Hulu or whatever, and you can watch from the comfort of your couch without another device. It is doing TV better than a non smart TV.
Also, I would love it if there was a good FOSS TvOS.
That's having wet laundry sit for most of the day, which the person above already said they didn't want to do.
You think I can remember to set that?! Well look at you, miss functional adult!
I have my air fryer connected to the internet
I wonder if usage of a phone app for controling and such impacts data use. If the app connects to an LG server before processing the task or notification, maybe its also grabbing a bunch of data from the phone as well?
What kind of permissions does the app ask for? That'll tell ya right there.
The only permission I have enabled for LG ThinQ is notifications. I also have a Home Assistant integration that has access to my LG washer/dryer
Why do you have it hooked up to the Internet?
"Sock! Sock! Sock! Sock! Sock! Sock! Sock! Sock! Sock! Shirt! Sock! Sock! Sock! Sock!" - LG Dishwasher, probably.
I believe that if a dishwasher sees a sock, it might be used for the wrong purposes.
You don't know me.
If you give it a sock, it will become a free dishwasher.
I wonder how many cum socks it would take to poison the data collected 🤔
Bro
Pretty disappointed in Lemmy not noticing and downvoting this AI slop.
I'm all for calling out bullshit IoT garbage but zoom in and look closer.
Update: op updated the photo with a non AI image that's the same but without hallucinated text. The original graph was real and made by a human, but through memes got degraded and an AI upscaler added new hallucinated text to it. Mystery solved and fixed.
You're right, but also, why did someone use AI to make this image look worse??
The original is included in this article: https://www.tomshardware.com/networking/your-washing-machine-could-be-sending-37-gb-of-data-a-day
Lovely_reader doing the real investigative journalism here, I love it ☺️
So yes it's ai slopified, but it is also a real graph that didn't need to be slopified but was done so using AI upscaling.
So, everyone is right in a way fun twist 😅
Pretty sure I saw a post version of this like a year ago or so, with the font not janky in any way
What makes you think this is AI?
I mean, if you zoom in and actually read the text, it very quickly becomes noticeable as fake
Look at the numbers on the scale. Look at the “Downloaid” numbers. Look at the fact that “Syert” is apparently a data unit.
Or how about the fact that something apparently managed to “Uploaid” 97.70 Bytes? Not KB. Not MB. Bytes. You can’t upload .7 bytes, because a byte isn’t divisible by 10. A byte has 8 bits, so it is only measured in eighths. You could upload .625B, or .75B, but not .70B.
Worst part? The original is super easy to find, and also didn't need up-scaling at all.
Maybe it's in Gaelic
On the day that’s between 31\ and 59, the scale that goes from 15poc to 301 000 is making up less Uploaid, of which the total is 53,8B Syert. Both totals are 3.66 GB
It’s been around for several years. It’s probably been passed around so much that the image quality degraded and someone sharpened it with AI which disrupted the text.
I saw this probably 6-7 years ago on reddit, the answer was that the appliance was attempting to download and install an update, then failing the update for some reason, so it was constantly re-downloading the patch all day.
Nothing nefarious or AI slop (other that some crappy image correction) about this.
Interesting. The image seems to have been fixed now, I didn’t know that’s possible. As for your theory, it would then show download traffic, not upload like seen here. I hope the washing machine got fixed too.
My brain hurts
Uploaid and downloaid, and many of the numbers in the chart are in no order
The suggestions that are being used as placeholders for numbers.
For a while, I carefully scrutinized every image for signs of AI
Now, I've decided to not bother with a close examination unless it's important for some reason. There's not enough time in the day
True however it could be ai upscaling. I seem to remember this post or at least something similar.
I always notice and downvote the ai slop but here I don't see the patterns?
Also I think I saw this graph from more than a year ago
Edit: op replaced the ai slop graph with the original one so that's why I didn't see the garbled text
Shit almost missed it. Thank you.
My dishwasher keeps begging for internet. And it can keep on fucking begging.
Depends on the manufacturer, it can be useful. Here's my dishwashers internet usage:
Basically two notifications, one that it's done one that a machine cleaning is needed. Less than a Kilobyte of data.
I know that it’s done when it stops making noise.
"and in case it starts making noises I don't recognize, there is a shotgun nearby"
My dishwasher is not audible in the middle of the night if I stand more than 5 steps away. During the day with all the noise of daily life... not even if I hug it.
That’s fair, honestly I was mostly joking. I just have a fairly deep distrust of IoT devices, even if not for the privacy angle they’re generally not built with robust network security in mind.
Does your dishwasher not have a drying cycle?
If only there was a way to show that information on the actual machine. The one you need to be in front of to do anything about the information.
If I'm in my office I need to first get to the dishwasher. If I'm on my way home I can't turn on the oven to preheat. If my kids leave the fridge open I want to be notified before all the food is ruined, even if I'm at work.
I know that lemmy is fully of contrarians, but not everything is a conspiracy theory. Sometimes progress is useful.
You really should not turn the oven on remotely, especially when you have kids. Also your food will definitely not be ruined because your kids leave the fridge open for a few hours. And for the dishwasher you can just set a timer.
The oven is set high and has triple isolation, even after 1 h it's barely hot on the surface, plus the kids are with us when shopping. The fridge will surely compromise the food, plus consume a lot of energy. And no timer can select the mode of the dishwasher, or change or on the fly or integrate projected solar production.
I will not make my life more expensive,.more risky and less comfortable to save 1kb of internet traffic.
Neighbors house almost burned down because of remote controlled device. It was a sauna stove instead of a oven and didn't even have network, just control panel outside of the sauna where you could turn it on without checking the stove first. Kids had left some plastic toy on the stove. Gladly they noticed the smell just in time, few minutes more and smoke would have ignited, at least according to firemen who were alerted on site.
My stove has option for remote control too via simple relay input so I could just throw in esphome or whatever on it and control it across the world over home assistant, but for that exact reason I didn't install anything on the header.
If you have meat or dairy items in your fridge, those can become unsafe to eat after only 2 hours. Since the cold air is more dense, it spills out the bottom of the fridge and gets replaced by room temperature air rather quickly. I've definitely eaten my fair share of questionable foods going past this, but the calculus changes if you're giving that food to other people.
As for the main point, agreed. I'm definitely not a luddite, but if I had kids who weren't yet responsible enough to not leave a fridge open for hours, I think I'd just put child locks on the fridge and make sure they had access to something else.
Yeah but i did the same thing with a zigbee socket.
Which i just stuck in there as a route booster between the main house and basement brewery (under kitchen)
It's not the same (I have that setup for the washing machine which doesn't have wifi). You just get on/off status and power usage, enough for notifications alone. You don't get other info, or control. Like start the dishwasher remotely on a fast cycle because unexpected guests. Or on the eco cycle when solar power is available. Or pre-heat the oven when leaving the store with frozen pizzas.
It's not a must have thing, but a nice comfort feature.
Yeah nah they're not big enough carrots for the concerns introduced
What exactly are the concerns?
Overall I'm quite excited about smart home stuff, but it must live on its own isolated network with some device I have full control over as a bridge to the internet (home-assistant+tailscale or a similar setup). No "IoT" device should have direct internet access, ever.
Point 1 doesn't concern me much because the oven doesn't come with a camera or microphone. At most they might know how hot I bake my pizza at. I can tell you all here: it's 180C.
Point 2 doesn't either, all IoT devices run their own WLAN isolated from my network and each other.
Similar setup here, home assistant bridge which is then available via reverse proxy from the internet.
Privacy concerns, unecessary technical faultpoints, ownership and control concerns, security vulnerabilities (that then offer a jump point to compromise the rest of the network), bullshit repair hampering....
I volunteer my private information. Here it is for you too: I run the dishwasher at 55C in eco mode which takes 4h and 5 minutes. There, now the whole internet knows about it. It doesn't have a camera pointed at my bed, it's a dishwasher.
The wifi is not needed for it to work, it's an addictional interface. If anything it provides redundancy, in case some of the buttons (which are exposed to water and chemicals) fail.
All my IoT devices are in a separate vlan and ssid, so security doesn't worry me much
And regarding repair, I chose this brand because they offer replacement parts even for 20 year old appliances, with manuals how to repair it yourself. And again, if the wifi fails I will still have the buttons.
Yeah all this sounds really nice for with a home assistant setup. I'd love to be able to start my washing machine to start while I'm at work so it's done when I get home and can throw it in to the dryer real quick even though I'm busy that day.
any kind of unified interface for all those smart gadgets?
Home assistant
groovy
New kink unlocked
I think in 1980 3.7 GB of data seemed further away then a flying car.
We have the tech for flying cars, it's just not practical or economical. We've even got flying bikes and good jet packs
Flying cars would be a nightmare for the FAA. Helicopters are enough for cases where you need to land in a small area where fixed-wing aircraft can’t
The idiots around my place can't even get around in regular cars. Pretty damn sure half of them would be dead within 2 months so it's flying cars.
Oof imagine the severity of car accidents when they occur in the sky
Isn't someone in China trying to do flying taxis. No idea about plausibility I just read things on the interweeb.
I know that in Moscow you could order a "flying taxi" with Yandex.Taxi (russian uber thing), it was actually a tiny two-seat helicopter. I suspect that Chinese "flying taxis" would be quite similar.
80s cyberpunk where they have video calling and moon resorts, but the internet is closer to a system of carrier pidgeons than whatever the fuck this is.
That's....actually a really good point
If I remember correctly the OP of this network traffic graph figured out that their network equipment were accidentally misattributing the traffic to the washer, and it was actually some other device that had caused the traffic.
The toaster
Related: a criminal group managed to steal data from a casino thanks to their internet connected fish tank. In 2017
https://www.forbes.com/sites/leemathews/2017/07/27/criminals-hacked-a-fish-tank-to-steal-data-from-a-casino/
HAHAHAHA
Bored household item developed sexting addiction with ChatGPT
the hell? why the fuck a washing machine needs a wifi for? to google how to wash clothes?
Just wait until you find out about wifi connected toothbrushes
man, i'm living under a rock - why the fuck would you need a wifi on a toothbrush?
When I installed pihole at home the Number One request in the network was the Google nest thermostat. Why the fuck do you need to upload the temperature or other stuff this often?
Doesn't that one have a microphone?
no, it "only" has a room presence + humidity + temperature sensor
From this point on , any useful new technology, any advancement in medicine, will be for the very wealthy. The rest of us will be taking ivermectin and paying unholy fees just to keep driving our falling-apart cars.
Lesson: never buy an appliance that has internet connectivity.
If they ever sell a smart hammer that measures my impact strength and sends it to some system somewhere for further analysis then I'm giving up building. Let the damn AI build. Why does the world incorporate tech even when it adds nothing to a pre-existing method and drives up the price? Oh...I get it now.
Because "data is the new oil."
Doesn't matter what that data is, collect it first, and figure out how to sell it later.
except this oil is like 99% useless given the current scope of data collection.
You say that, until your hammer data is used to detect improper use, which your employer's insurance can use to deny a claim.
Or it can be used to void a warranty. Or it could detect G-forces of your commute to work and raise your car insurance rates for hard accelerations. Or a biometric sensor in the handle can tell your boss if you can work another 30 minutes before there is a financially significant risk of heatstroke.
You get the idea, that data is useless, until some hairbrained jackass packages it and sells it's to an even more unscrupulous asshole.
i wonder why the governments haven't close this shop given how fucked up this whole thing is... oh wait...
just how fucked up it can get?
Period tracking apps are selling the data of minors to states where abortion is illegal in order to to see if they become pregnant (or un-pregnant).
Need I go on?
Psssst. They’re “in on it.”
yeah. fuck this shit!
And the typical consumer has no critical thinking skills and also, is ignorant, and very often a moron, and a sucker. People aren’t smart. The appliances are lol. And the people at the top of giant companies have a greed that is insatiable.
I think the typical consumer just does not give a fuck. The rest are as you say. The rest after that are complicit.
The products are made to male the owners Roch not benefit the users.
Though it would be cool to do that and then set up microphones to pick up the house settling sounds and see if there's a correlation. If only those with the resources to set that up could be trusted to not abuse that access to data because I wouldn't consent to some data firm having access to mics in my place.
What the fuck kind of data could it be? Crazy shit
Money laundering.
Ba dum tssssssss
Seen a bunch of theories on this but the most likely one is that the washer ended up in a loop of failing firmware updates, downloading the same thing over and over again. It fits with the graph showing that it’s downloaded data. Could also straight up be a reporting bug in the router as someone else said.
Gremlins in the washing machine were watching a movie.
I imagine a darkened office in the far outreaches of an LG research facility where a hermit lives.
They call him the stain expert. He gazes at this data all day.
they're learning every crease in your underwear
Long as they dont know my skids...
To be honest they wish they didn't.....
Err...anyone actually zoomed in to this weird AI-slop? 😁
Not that I doubt that those "smart" things send whatever they may find...
Canteit, Uploaid, Syert, and Downloaid are all totally normal human words!
Only if you have the latest PLS-protection!
It could also be ai upscaled. I believe I’ve seen a post similar to this before.
I think i did too, but this one was clearly not it. And this shitty quality image upscaled? Very unlikely.
Go a little back and look at the prediction made in 1949 for the future, written in a book with the title "1984".
Sure, it came a little late than forecast, but a lot of it came true.
Today's society has been pretty predictable for quite a while:
Sure, people used to think "Democracy" and thus "This time is different", but it turns out politicians and elites under Democracy still operate per the very same principles of Power as in the early XX century, they just managed over the years since then to get the populace to stop thinking and talking about Power itself and instead think only in terms of Politics all the while making sure Politics was subservient to older forms of Power, most notably Money.
Personally, ever since I observed how governments in the West reacted to the 2008 Crash, most notably who they chose to save and who they chose to pay for it, that I realized that the power of Democracy (specifically, the control of Citizens over how countries are managed by chosing who manages it using their Vote) has been made almost entirelly subservient to the power of Money, which is why it looks so much like we live in Oligarchies with theatrical Voting that changes only that which Money doesn't care about (hence the loud Identity Wars in the Moral plane between the dominant parties) rather than real Democracy.
Brave New World got it even better because in that book, everyone welcomed oppression with open arms and celebrated it.
I just checked. My LG washer and LG dryer both transmit ~30KB a day whether we use them or not. I do like being notified when they finish since they're in the basement and my work desk is upstairs. I wouldn't know otherwise.
Have dumb washer and dryer. I set an alarm for an hour. It won't hurt your clothes sitting for a second.
I miss the one at my old apartment that was combined wash and dry. I could toss stuff in at 4am., eat breakfast, fuck off for work, come back and its all washed and dried with no sitting there all day wet smell.
Set a timer?
My BSH machines transmit less than 1KB a day, even when actively using them.
Well in 1985 they "predicted" that in 2015 we will be so advanced that we will all have Home Cold Fusion Reactor, flying cars, double neck tie and each home will have multiple Fax Machines.
Well, we now technically have a fusion reactor in the sky, and we can receive the energy it beams down right at our homes
The 1980's - Padded with lies, just like the shoulders in mall blazers.
say what you will about al-qaeda but at least they made a solid demonstration as you why flying cars have always been a stupid fucking idea.
Hmm. This sounds like maths.
Quick google search say that averag plane weights are about 40 000 kg for small jets, 70 000kg for narrow-body planes and up to 570 000 kg for large wide-body planes.
While average car weight is somewhere in the 2000 kg mark.
If the dreams of flying cars come to trough the way most scifi/cyperpunk depicts them and the flight speeds would be at the similiar range than driving on the street.
So lets be generous and say flying cars would be much hevyer and weight 3000kg and the flight speed would max 175 km/h wich is pretty much the max speed for regular cars.
Lets go with the average plane so Weight is 70 000kg and flight speed is 930km/h
So maths:
E = 0.0386 * m * v^2
Car: E = 0.0386 * 3 000 * 175^2 ≈ 3.5MJ
Plane: E = 0.0386 * 70 000 * 930^2 ≈ 2.3GJ
So you would need about 670 cars to get same impact as one plane.
*all the numbers came from google-fu and from my ass. Also all the maths was done while sitting on a toilet, so there is large margin for error.
who says you need the same impact? a car can still fly through your window.
I'm not talking about literally recreating 9/11 itself, especially since the twin towers are not as tall as they were. shame. anyway, my point is flying cars make any kind of accident a potential mini-9/11. you can put guardrails on roads, what the hell are you going to have for flying cars?
Talking about the danger. Cars can allready be driven to masses and many houses or businesess dont have any guard railings protecting them from normal cars, but we dont see those happening that much. Why it would suddenly change, by adding additional dimension.
Also small planes are not really that hard to come by. Why we dont have those driving in to buildings now?
Also doing "mini-9/11" would most certainly kill or atleast hospitialize the driver. I can somehow understand giving your live for cause you support and cause the enemy lot of pain, but i think there would be much higher treshold to give a life for something that is very unlikely to do anything but structural damage and hurt your self.
More likelly would be crashing while driving under influence, but i would imagine there would be higher treshold for anybody to fly drunk than drive drunk.
because there are roads and usually cars stick to those. grip is an important aspect of safety. there's no grip in the air.
small planes aren'tn hard to come by? compared to cars? also do you think flying cars are going to use the same routes as planes? what about air traffic control?
you're still thinking about my point as deliberate attacks when I'm talking about accidents having much bigger consequences. contrary to your belief there are tons of guardrails, literally or conceptually, around roads. there are no such things in air. if your car goes haywire in the air, it can end up anywhere.
I'll concede higher threshold for drunk driving even though I don't believe it can be enforced reliably. let's say you can. people still make mistakes while sober. even more when tired. or preoccupied.
I must missread something somewhere. I put much more weight on the terror side than the accident side.
If i was a civic engineer and a law maker and i would need to start making infra for flying cars, cities would be no fly zones, outside of dedicate "roads" that can be designed in so there is minimal danger to others in the case of crash. There would need to be dedicated flight height. These could be enforced similiarry than rentable electricscooters are now, so if driver would drive on a no fly zone or at wrong height the car would slow down. These would need to be build in things from the manufactorer. These no flight zones would also be near anything dangerous like energy plants, airports, military instalations etc etc.
We have allready things like automatic braking because pedestrians or deer or other cars. These would need to be supercharged so the vehicles do not let people drive to close other people or buildings.
Then things like harhers punishments for breaking the traffic law, more strict inspections for the vechicles and own permint for driving flying cars, that is prerequisite to buy a car and if you loose it, you cant keep the car, or there needs to be a mechanism where the car is made earhbound only.
A lot of responcilibity for the manufactores in case there are malfunctions.
Own mandatory insurance for flying, that pays to the victims in case of anything happening.
Mandatory breath analyzier for starting the vehicle, or in more scifi world blood test for any substances.
Drivers licence should have strict health inspection and it would need to be renewd often.
Mandatory flight plan system, where you need to mark where you are leaving from and where you are going, and the system could caluculate current traffic and give you the flight path, height and landing spot. So in a way automatic flight control that can open new "roads" if needed and there would be information on all traffic all the time so collision risk is small and traffic flows.
Clear idea that flying is not a right, it is a responsibility.
Edit: added few points.
dumb washers clean as well and are cheaper, idk why would want online access, i need to be there to load and unload, and if i have different electric power metering for night time, all it needs is a clock
Network access can make sense if you want to be notified when your wash is done. Some cycles don't have a preset running time. You can do some neat stuff with home automation. None of that should require internet access or use a cloud service controlled by the manufacturer.
But how will LG know my usage patterns to better nickel and dime their next model down to bare minimum standards if my device isn't checking in with the cloud every couple minutes? My device needs weekly software updates so it can notify me when the pump mysteriously quits after an update and the washer has already booked the service visit and shared my credit info with the repair company.
correct on all fronts with exception to the service visit... that wouldn't happen, they just tell you to throw it out because the pump somehow costs 3x as much as the machine
They tell you to throw it out after their certfied technician bills you 3 hours to tell you its not worth fixing.
true
My washing machine is in the basement, there isn't even a WiFi signal
I dunno, man. Home Assistant talks to my LG washer and dryer. The tablet on my desk shows a countdown timer for both when they're running. It's convenient as hell because I can't hear the finish chime from my office.
Just to stay on topic, according to my router they've generated 256KB of traffic this week and 1.55MB the past month.
You guys aren’t seeding torrents with your appliances?
Another reason why im buying a speed queen.
What is a washing machine doing that adds up to 3.7 gigs of data, per DAY? How many loads it does? How long it sits before it gets emptied? Why would anyone even care?
And so far the flying cars that exist are about 10 times as expensive as normal cars. One of those things you buy if you already got the Lamborghini and have still an empty spot in the garage.
Aye, it's cheaper to keep'yer little peeper cub in its plane sleeper, and just have two cars for either end. Tiny planes are relatively cheap and could be afforded on an upper middle class salary like an engineer, mid-tier lawyer, or software coder, much the same way as a second car.
I mean, maybe that's not true anymore with how wages have been suppressed while costs have risen, but it was the last time I saw flying cars being seriously discussed.
There was but, from what I recall, it turned out to be a bug in the router software not counting the traffic correctly.
There was but, from what I recall, it turned out to be a bug in the router software not counting the traffic correctly.
How much fucking data does a spinning thing of water need?!
Roughly 3.7 GB per day, if I had to guess.
What is a reasonable amount of data for a washing machine to use (other than zero)?
There is no other reasonable amoujt
For some, there are. Just have to be a multi millionaire.
WHY DO WASHING MACHINES HAVE ACCESS TO THE INTERNET???
Well you do need 17 blood settings, it needs to send a dvd to figure that out /s
note that flying cars exist (they're called private airplanes) but they're looked down upon because they obviously consume way too much energy for getting people from A to B.