With how shitty some Christians are, you really have to wonder if Lucifer or Satan is truly "evil"
When I was a teenager, I went to church, and almost every ‘Christian’ there was a complete asshole. What makes it worse is that they try to justify it. This honestly made me think that if God and Satan were real, I’d want to know Lucifer’s story. Maybe he’s not actually ‘evil.’
331
Comments116
Lucifer's crime was daring to question his father.
After being cast out he was put in charge of overseeing those that were deemed by that same father to be bad after death.
Seems to be a common link there, and it's not Lucifer.
And then there's the book of Job, the entirety of which is a story where God and Satan make a bet over a guy named Job. Satan says Job is only faithful because of the wealth God has granted him. God says Job is genuinely faithful, and tells Satan he can put Job to the test. So Satan has the entire guy's family killed by bandits, he loses all his material possessions, and winds up plagued and homeless. Job mostly keeps his faith, yet he is persecuted by his friends (just verbally) who believe his sudden punishments are happening because he must have done something wrong and his faith must be false. Still, he holds out, mostly. Then, when Job finally starts to actually crack, God shows up as a fucking whirlwind and goes on a long-ass ramble about how great he (God) is, to which Job humbles himself. God's response to this is to praise Job. He then chews out Job's friends who persecuted him and demands they sacrifice 7 bulls and 7 rams and have Job pray for them because God is only gonna listen to Job, nevermind it was all a bet between God and Satan that led to this misunderstanding. Then Job is gifted twice what he had, 14000 sheep, 6000 camels, 1000 yoke of oxen, and 1000 female donkeys. A new family, with seven sons and three daughters, and of course the daughters are just the most beautiful daughters in the whole land. Then Job lived another 140 years. And this definitely makes up for the first family slaughtered, because the Bible says so.
Something something reading the Bible is the greatest proof you can ever need that it's bullocks.
Children are fungible of course
Like NFTs?
How attached are you to any of those tokens? Would any of equivalent value be more or less the same? If so yes
I liked the take on this story in good omens
If everybody you
meetmake is an asshole...No, I think his crime was that he wanted to take away the whole purpose of life aka living with choice between good and evil. Then the icing was that he wanted God's glory to be given to him.
My understanding of the purpose of life is that we have no memory of before, we are faced with plausible good and evil choices, and finally we get some hardware that lasts (physical body). There is some irony that the option for evil comes first from lucifer.
If you have come to understand lucifer as good and god as bad aren't you just... ermm... nvm.
I mean... God literally commits genocide multiple times, and that's just from the stories that they chose to actually include. Satan/Lucifer mostly tempts people to do things they want to do anyway.
Seems pretty cut and dry honestly.
Nothing against rascals or tricksters here.
Thinking critically? The dude demanding total obedience and subservience under the threat of eternal torture is not the good guy.
Yeah! That! You know, or just playing nomenclature musical chairs.
I feel like many Christians in America are completely disconnected from actual values espoused by Jesus in the Bible. Republican (many of the Christians) policy is diametrically opposed to Matthew 25:31. No one quotes John 13:34 because they rather quote Old Testament BS about what’s an abomination. Why not focus on the love for others, including enemies? Why not focus on helping the poor, the sick, the homeless? Why not help the immigrant? The Bible specifically calls this out as a marker of getting into heaven.
Most of these people don’t even read the book. They like the sense of community at a church, but it feels like it’s formed into a total in:out group mentality. We can’t be a Christian nation as long as there are poor & people struggling.
Then the Utah governor says something like, “We can’t have people camping wherever they want.” my emphasis. Bud, they don’t WANT to be homeless. The lack of empathy is so apparent.
I see those kinds of Christians as revisionist Christians. US evangelical Christianity is like it's own religion that does not follow the teachings of the Bible or Christ. Their religion is guided by their political dogma, not the other way around.
Yeah, totally different than Cathlocism which never did that kind of thing. Or any of the other sects of Christianity which never did that kind of thing.
Stupid people are dangerous in groups, like the most scary dangerous thing on the planet in the Holocene.
I never said others were good.
also where the rapture came from, evangelicals.
Those kinds of 'Christians' are in the Bible; if you take the rather common view that Revelation is not prophetic but rather describes things which have already happened, then they've been around for a long time
You're correct.
Check out "The Separation of Church and Hate" by John Fugelsang. It's an almost comprehensive teardown of Christofascist ideology using the words of Jesus directly. No extras and no oulled punches. It's excellent. The author is a comedian and while the content is serious and presented well it's dressed up as an easier read than I expected.
I grew up Christian in the American South. I left religion in college and faith generally a few years later. I was initially compelled to leave organized Christianity exactly because it demanded exercising cruelties which Jesus clearly opposed.
Fugelsang's book gathers all of the major contradictions between Jesus and modern right-wing Christianity then dismantles any justification for each one just by quoting Jesus. I'm recommending this book to every reasonable person I know as required reading for the present moment. Not just in the US but the world over.
Fascism respects nothing and if it takes root in a land with the means to export then no shore is necessarily safe harbor.
they get thier fill from evangelical/televangelist pastors.
Supply side Jesus
Have you read the Bible? The only evil shit that Satan does is when he fucks up Job's life, and that's in collusion with God. Meanwhile, God is doing evil on almost every page of the Old Testament.
The reason we're supposed to hate Satan is because he rebelled against God. Again, if you've read the Old Testament, you have dozens of good reasons to rebel against God.
This train of thought is what lead to the creation of Satanism as a literary movement in the 19th century and then as a religion in the late 20th century.
Also, the "satan" that is the Torah is actually more of a job title, that of an "accuser".
Sure, but we're talking about Satan within Christian mythology, not Judaism.
Jesus was a Jew. He believed a lot of what is in the Torah. It wasn't until about 600 years later the Bible was "finished"
That's cool and all, but I don't see how that changes anything. Christian Satan is different from Jewish Satan.
As a man who works in retail, Lucifer was an employee who thought he deserved a raise, and maybe even take over as manager one day, but the current manager didn't like that so he sent Lucy to burn at the customer service desk (hell) for eternity.
Well, there's also Lucifer's questionable scheme to genocide and enslave all the customers, though that part is debated.
Wait, are you saying that Amazon is actually Satan?
You ever read the three little pigs, from the perspective of the wolf?
The Bible is one side of a story.
Cogito ergo Diablo
I think, therefore I'm the Devil?
Lucifer was just unionizing the angels. God is just the first union buster and ran a smear campaign against the organizer.
Lucifer is also called "the light bringer" as he is tied to the persuit of knowledge. In other words he was woke and was cast away.
I like the name Lucifer. Which is why I called my dog Lucifer. He's a 8.2 kilo dog who loves pink, and has diamonds on his collar. He also goes by Luci or Lulu. It's so much fun to see the confusion in some peoples eyes when I tell them he's a he.
I think my favourite was when he was 7 months old, and we were in a confirmation in Norway and was allowed into the church. Afterwards, everyone wanted to meet him, and some faces when they heard his name was fucking priceless!
I have Luci the Cat who also goes by Lulu.... he's like Luci from Disenchantment. He too is a he
My interpretation of Book of Job is God and Satan are in a toxic relationship where they egg each other on to fuck with people so you shouldn't trust either of them.
We moved on from the pantheons of Greece, Egypt, Rome, the Norse and Aztecs, etc. Hopefully one day our descendants will be smart enough to realize that Abrahamic mythology is no different than any other, it was just more successful.
Satan pretty much exists as the bad cop to Yaweh's police chief. Both are in cahoots, it is just that one can be thrown under the bus when convenient to do so.
Much like how the president is lying about Chicago and Portland being crime filled dens of sin to keep people from finding out how cool of a city they are.
Portland seems so cool, based on all the live videos they have shared.
I like Satan because he brings presents to kids on Christmas made by elves in the North Pole, in exchange for some cookies and a kiss from Mom
"I have no special regard for Satan; but I can at least claim that I have no prejudice against him. It may even be that I lean a little his way, on account of his not having a fair show. All religions issue bibles against him, and say the most injurious things about him, but we never hear his side." - Mark Twain
You don't have to look at Christians to think God isn't so good.
In the Bible, Satan kills 10 people, Job's children, and he did it with God's blessing while they were having a bet.
God killed entire cities, all the firstborn of a nation even down to the slave's children, killed everyone on earth except 8 people, killed a guy for picking up sticks, killed a guy for not allowing the ark of the covenant to fall, told the Hebrews to attack nations and kill every man woman and child in the land and was furious when they left a few alive, had a God-off to show he was more powerful and when the other side converted to believe in him he had them killed, killed David's son and had his 10 wives publicly raped, killed 42 children for making fun of a bald guy... the list goes on, not to mention that God told the Hebrews to have slave's, women were property and have to be killed if they ruin the one thing they were good for, their virginity.
Christians have weirdest relationship with the Bible. Many don't really read it. If they did, they'd be Jewish. Jesus said to keep the Jewish laws, but Paul said it's ok not to. Christians go with Paul instead of Jesus and generally disregard the Old Testament except the parts they think prove Jesus was the Messiah.
The Old Testament is a monotheistically rebranded Epic of Gilgamesh. A lot of the themes were borrowed adapted and rebranded from there and other literature are the time. Even the monotheistic Jewish God Yahweh takes on the title of the supreme God in the Canaanite pantheon (El).
The Old Testament is a time capsule from 5000 years ago. There are some general concepts that can apply to a modern moral life but if you tried to follow everything it says in life today, it would be problematic.
The clear message in the Old Testament is one of God as the absolute and final authority. Its very clear that the message is one to keep people in check. Theres often bending of the rules and some degree of favoritism towards God's chosen ones. Does not give off an egalitarian vibe but religion is generally not meant for that. Its generally meant to reinforce hierarchical structures (and to get people to accept them even if they are the lowest rung on the ladder out of fear of God).
I agree in general but I can't think of anything in the OT that is taken from The Epic of Gilgamesh except the Noah's Ark story, which is a clear rip-off. And the 5000 years ago is too long, I think the oldest books are from the 8th century BCE.
You mean the god that prioritizes fealty and "love" for him alone over virtue, righteousness and good works? One who will give entrance to heaven to a life long sadistic, violent, and self-centered man who repents in his death bed, but will eternally condemn a man who has fed and clothed millions, who saved lives, who reformed bigots and criminals but questioned the existence of God or worshipped another. Compared to Satan, an angel that wished to overthrow this selfish god. Who values knowledge and choice in humanity. Who rewards ambition and creative joy. Who is stuck in hell with the rest of those condemned by the Almighty. I mean, is really no wonder many Christians are how they are.
If you haven't, read Horns by Joe Hill (skip the movie, it's not the same). It plays a lot with this dynamic. The protagonist isn't a hero, isn't "the good guy", but has a righteous cause and when God fails him, the Devil steps up.
I mean, Lucifer is an angel who questioned the system. We know that statistically, there is a chance he is right and everyone else is wrong. Based on my observations of humanity, the chance of the minority being right is higher.
Honestly to me the whole concept of Lucifer as written in the bible to me, makes me question the whole thing.
like 5 year old me was like "OK wait so how is this guy so stupid that he thinks that he went to battle against god, is he really stupid, everyone knows god is 100% perfectly all powerful", then you think further and realize literally lucifer was supposedly like the closest angel to god, if anyone has a solid view on gods power, it's him. Which honestly points to the idea that god... isn't immortal, isn't all powerful etc... he just uses that lie as a crux to prevent people from threatening him.
Honestly the story of the tower of babel cements that even more. Now first of all if you've heard this story from christians... get rid of the pre-conception because usually preachers etc remove a lot of what is actually in the text, and add things that aren't there. The story is not about stupid men trying to build a stairway to heaven.
The story as written, in short, man was amazingly unified, world peace was achieved. They were building the tower as an enormous landmark so basically people could see their city from wherever they were, as well as just a testament to what they could accomplish when they worked together.
God looks down at it and says "wow, look at these humans, when they work together, they can accomplish anything they set their mind to. They keep this up and they would be as powerful as gods. To which, god saw that as a credible threat, and so he smashed the tower, spread them all out, and made them speak different languages. Ensuring that they would be too busy fighting eachother rather then becoming a potential threat to him later.
In short, the old testiment is kind of littered with actions that only make sense, if you conclude god, actually has weaknesses and can be beaten.
"can be" vs. "should be". But yes, the god of the Torah is a jealous god. I mean, he flat-out says, "you shall have no other gods before me". Not, "no other gods exist", or "you can't respect other gods". Just, none before him. Which says that while he might be omniscient and omnipotent, he's not the only god who is so.
Like, in the story he literally sends Moses' follower to do a sorcery battle with the priests of the gods of Egypt. They're both able to turn their staffs into serpents, which implies they're both getting divine help. But Yahweh had the bigger serpent (could this be any more on the nose?), so was proven to be the more potent god.
This is interpreted both ways. The “original” Cult of Yahweh view saw the god Yahweh as El, the head god of the Canaanite pantheon. Later, after the Cult of Yahweh became old Judaism, the comandment was reinterpreted as Yahweh being the only god jews should worship, and then later as the only God, since any other divine being worshipped by others would not be God.
I recall as a kid being told most of the angels rebelled with Lucy. That was told in the perspective that God was all powerful to put down the superior numbers. As an adult its more like bro?? Wtf 75% rebelled?
lol yeah one of those things that is attempted to be fanfic to make him seem stronger... but in the end it does the exact opposite. If most the people on your side rebel, you either made or recruited very evil people that thought you looked weak. Or you were doing things that they found horendous enough they'd rather make a futile attempt and accept the cost of failure then take part in whatever you are doing.
The old testament - in many parts - as well as other ancient "religious" texts, is the passed down reflection of humans on the process of "civilizing" themselves during the late neolithic period. It's all there, beginning with the end of their life as hunter-gatherers and the emergence of diseases of civilization, the hardship and suffering that came along with the "gift" they got that is learning how to cultivate land.
It's been the complete loss of everything that made up human life for the largest part of our (pre-)history, suddenly gone, because we literally "tasted the fruit".
You can call yourself anything you want, and no one will stop you. Calling yourself a Christian, while violating every tenet of Christian teachings, does not qualify you as a Christian. I finally coined the term Hypochrists for people like that.
There are plenty of Christians who do follow Christian teachings, to one extent or another, and are generally trying to be decent people. Unfortunately, there are also large numbers of "Christians" who just use the name to justify their selfish behavior, hatred, and cruelty.
All large religions have, or have had, groups like that. Any social institution that can provide credibility is going to be abused as a tool to gain power by someone. It is appalling that the Hypochrists have become large enough, and powerful enough, to have taken over the popular image of what Christianity is.
Hypochrists is a good one.
The only right answer in this thread.
Thomas Paine's The Age of Reason
Anne Rice wrote an interesting book in the Vampire series on this, Memnoch the Devil, where the narrative is that Satan created a place for the souls to go that God otherwise would have extinguished in his cold hatred for much of humanity. Satan, who loved humans more than any other angel, rebelled against God's harsh treatment of them, and was cast down as a result.
Look into Gnosticism. Eventually what got me interested in Luciferianism.
I wish I'd started with the parent religion, but aspects of gnosticism and hermeticism actually prepared me to begin to understand it, lol. It's a new journey.
I mean the guy actually met God and decided to rebel. Meanwhile, we have to believe without evidence and assume he knows best. Sure, buddy, sure
If it were a democracy Satan would still end up in hell.
Early christians had an interesting take on this.
Before the religion organized into a hierarchical orthodoxy, communities distant from the emerging establishment (not particularly attached to jewish traditions) in places like Alexandria were left to their own devices to figure out christianity: they formed loose households & study circles to interpret texts in the context of their local traditions & culture and settled on a number of competing interpretations. Among them emerged a popular, influential interpretation.
This interpretation became known as gnosticism.
Sticklers with the evil trash god of older jewish scriptures didn't like this idea, became early church authorities, denounced it as heresy, & purged all the texts they could of it.
So, yes, even some early christians believed the entity modern christians refer to as god is kinda shit.
Popular Christianity is heavily based on paganism, which is incredibly ironic considering that paganism is generally posed as the antithesis of Christianity. The story of Lucifer is syncretized with the story of Prometheus, although Lucifer doesn't really benefit humanity at all. According to the popular interpretation, Lucifer is the origin of all evil, became a snake in the garden of Eden, and then tempted Eve to eat the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. However, the snake isn't actually connected to Lucifer in the text—that interpretation was added later to explain the problem of evil (why it exists if God is supposedly good)
The idea that Lucifer is insubordinate and violated the natural hierarchy is very old, but the idea that Lucifer is the origin of evil is relatively new.
Christian theology contains many holes like this because there's a tendency towards treating every word in the Bible as literal, where it may have been written allegorically or as a parable, as Jesus often did. (Just to be clear, Jesus did NOT write the Bible, I'm just pointing out that the writers of the Bible may have tried to replicate his style.) This issue is compounded when you include the Old testament, as it contains portions which are clearly mythological, but are nonetheless treated as fact by certain modern Christians.
Lucifer existed before but didn't become entangled with Satan until after christianity had roots. So it is a post biblical merge, but pre-biblical. The concept is older, the merge changed the focus of the concept.(69 is just number, until it becomes a joke as well.)
Satan and more properly the 'Devil' as is the main concept in modernity. This is due to the romans using this translation preferably from the Greeks. The devil then got most of their iconography from Pan and some roman art traditions. This is far more important than people realize. Anyways, all this was forming in the roman zeitgeist while Christianity was not canonical to the empire yet.
I like the Gnostic explanation that the being who created the material universe was a lesser deity of some sort (I think they call it evil but I'd probably go with chaotic or something). It made people to have intelligent-ish beings to interact with, and it put the Trees of "Knowledge of God & Evil" and "Life" in the Garden (for some reason) but didn't want Adam & Eve to become knowledgeable & immortal.
In this telling, the "Serpent" is Jesus by which they mean the physical projection of the actual highest actually all powerful, all loving, etc etc god, and it wants to free A&E so it convinced them to eat the fruit.
I know next to nothing about christinanity and this little taste had a nice archeological vibe to it. Can I ask you a followup question? What do we know about Jesus' style? Are the different accounts of his life consistent enough that we can infer a style of expression?
edit I am reading this now
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorship_of_the_Bible?wprov=sfla1
One thing we know about Jesus is that he was very good at using rhetorics. Other than the accounts in several books about him using rhetorical techniques very advanced for the day, there's also evidence that he was skilled enough to start a religion. But any information finer than that is hard to prove. The books are over a thousand years old, written at different times by different people, followed by several translations, so we can't know his exact word choice or style of speech with certainty. The closest to the 'source' are ancient Greek texts which were likely translated from some other language.
Alright, pretty cool ! thanks !
I'd be curious to know more about his rhetorics, I'll look this up but if you happen to remember specifically where I can find these accounts, don't hesitate to let me know. Cheers !
Satan was the good guy.
Even our language has been perverted. When we like something, we call it good - a word that is derived from god: we put it in god's vicinity. Therefore, it is instilled in us that everything we like must be close to god.
Satan isn't close to god but i still like them. How do i convey that in a single word?
Heinlein wrote about this very topic in "Job: A Comedy of Justice".
Fuck I read that as a kid but didn't realize it was Heinlein. Weirdly enough it was one of my very catholic father's books
Written by Larry David
I hear that. Catholic school kid here.
Lucifer ain't that bad on my book tbh.
It's funny cause... when you're a small kid it's very common to want to be a good boy/girl/other. Many of us, at an early age, wanted the approval and validation from those that knew and understood how things worked (in our eyes), but most importantly, had power over us. Lots of us wanted to be seen as good by them. You know, like lots of people (the ones that actually try) want to be seen as good by god.
Lucifer is a symbolic representation of.. well.. whatever it is one associates to them. However, most people associate the satanic impulse to that of individuation, of blazing our own trails and rejecting the established (maybe divine?) order. You know, like teenagers. Teenagers basically want to understand how much of what they were told and warned of was not true and how much power they have to change the things they were told could not be changed.
When many of us become adults, we realize that the people telling us how things worked when we were small children were pretty clueless, and many of the things they taught us were mistaken, but it doesn't matter if they were or they weren't. What matters is some of those people looked after or cared about us and did the best they could with the hand they got dealt. And you know... passing that down is a nice thing. No one's gonna send you to hell if you don't, ofc. You'll just feel better if you do.
And even if they go completely against everything we tried to convey at some point, that's just how people learn and grow (or transcend what was previously thought possible) so it's all part of the game.
Oh and yeah, Christians can be really shitty. Satanists can be shitty. The church can be shitty. Everyone and everything can feel really shitty at times. You know what isn't shitty though? When you make things better for other people. idk about you but it makes me feel good.
And about lucifer? Following the image of him or any other representation of what we aspire to have or become is pretty much the same as following any other aspiration. Like... whatever a deity represents to you or even rational stuff like love of knowledge. If you dedicate yourself to its pursuit and worship it through your actions more than anything else, you will see it everywhere and it will become the most important thing... until it fails you in a time of deep existential crisis and then you'll look for the next thing.
That's just how it goes. Now please excuse me while I go to keep dedicating my worldly existence to the big Great Pudu in the Sky.
Have a good one. :)
The only way Christianity makes any sense to me within the real world (aside from it being not real) is if Satan wrote the Bible pretending to be God, while denigrating the good guy as the rebellious angel Lucifer. If Satan had written the Bible instead of God, would you expect more genocide, slavery, torture, and rape, or less? So why is there any in the first place?
Look at 2000 years of Christian history. As soon as they could, they usurped political power in the most powerful nation in the area; Rome. Then began slaughtering and torturing anyone anywhere who thought different. They claimed divine rights and authority. They committed genocide in every single nation on the planet over nearly 2000 years. They perfected the dark arts of torture. They conquered earthly territory and plundered earthly wealth. They slaughtered so many that they built orphanages the world over where they could claim divine morality, but also rape children for centuries.
What did Lucifer do exactly? He told the first people that God was a lying dick and they should rebel against him, as he did.
Wouldn't you?
hes also known as samael before the fall, or lightbringer, which is pretty much the opposite in his current form. plus there were other angels that fell with him, but they are more obscure and depending different texts?
The name "Lucifer" also means "light bringer", and it can be interpreted to refer to his gift of the "light of reason" to humanity in the garden.
I got really stoned one time as teenager and thought I had come to the very real and imminent discovery that Christianity is and was always the work of deep evil to silence and quell all other true religions. The crusades, the burning of the library at Alexandria, Pope John Paul III sitting on his throne of pure gold, It all made perfect sense. Don’t question it, just have faith.
I more or less fell headlong into atheism of a sort shortly thereafter, so part of me must really believe that on some level I guess?
Sethian gnosticism. You beheld the demiurge and stopped short before seeing the light of the pleroma. You're not wrong, but there's a few more steps on the path yet.
You’re getting downvoted but I believe you’re principally correct. Except it’s Sethian.
Yeah thank you for that. Damned autocorrect is a crime against literacy.
I read the excerpt on Wikipedia and it didn’t seem to fully describe my own experiences, though I expect it doesn’t hold a candle to the depths of the topic. I will have to read more to see if it helps verbalize the feeling I get towards organized religion.
Thank you for this.
Isn't this the theme of WICKED? The "good" people are wicked and the "wicked" people are good. Of course, anyone who has done DMT knows that the insectoid creatures, machine elves, aliens, angels, clowns, snakes and green lady are all good which does make you wonder if we have it all backward.
I will choose the path that's clear.
You might be interested in Dr. Ammon Hillman, his doctorate is in classical philology and he has a masters in immunology as well, he's been reading and translating Ancient Greek for 35 years, including a lot of neglected medical texts. He asserts that both the Old and New testaments of the Bible were originally written in Greek, within a couple hundred years of each other. He has a lot of praise for Satan and the figure's apparent origins in Greek culture (Diana Lucifera and other mentions), and talks about Satan predating both Judaism and Christianity.
Hes also got plenty of scorn for Jesus, who according to his seemingly rigorous translation of the Greek bible was on a lot of drugs throughout his life and during his death, and was sexually exploiting and trafficking minors (the Apostles apparently ranged in age from 10-19)
He did some decent interviews on the Danny Jones show and on Hamilton Morris's podcast, and Ammon hosts a live stream a couple times a week at Lady Babylon on youtube. The name of his channel comes from Medea, a "sorceress" from Scythia who became queen of Babylon at one point. She was Hecate's daughter and sister to Circe from the Odyssey, and apparently was the first named person in history referred to as a "Christ", a term that he has showed at length refers to the use of drugs in antiquity. We get the word "medicine" from Medea.
Pretty outlandish if you're not familiar with him but despite his sometimes abrasive and eccentric presentation style I feel like the picture he paints of the ancient Greek world during the few centuries around the time of Jesus makes a lot of sense, and I appreciate that his channel is non-monetized and he doesnt accept donations for what he does sharing what he's found in half a lifetime of studying Greek source texts.
10-19... I guess he'd really fit in with his followers.
Also, in Dr. Hillman's book Original Sin: Child Rape and the Church he outlines how medieval and earlier rape of children by church leaders led directly out of Jesus' pederasty, something the priests wrote at length about using Jesus' actions as justification.
His other book The Chemical Muse was instrumental in getting academia to admit the widespread use of recreational drugs in antiquity.
Dr. Hillman doesnt get any money from the purchase of these books and he encourages you to pirate them.
Hey they crucified him for being arrested in the Garden of Gesthemane (Mark 14:51-52) in the middle of the night with a naked ~12 year old boy with a bandage on his junk (some drugs and eunuchs shit) - somehow Christians miss this crucial plot point of his big act. All the other apostles were at that time, out cold on the drugs he had given them.
Crucified between two other traffickers too, lestes in the Greek, same sort of people who held Julius Caesar for ransom - after Caesar got free he instituted crucifixion as the standard punishment for traffickers.
They mistranslate it as thieves and say Jesus was marked as a political rebel or something but the mob of people and heavily armed soldiers that came for him were very justified in their anger.
I felt this way coming from the Midwest to down south. There are plenty of biggots west of the missippi too but folks like the west borrow morons are rare. Down south id hear biggots on the goddamn radio.
At least for the most part, as an outsider, Midwest churches were mostly just seen doing charities (like that's all Jesus asked them do for others...).
I like the approach of - there is no tue good or evil, but acts of nature. Life feeds on life.
A head monk asks his disciples to describe a pitcher of water without calling it a pitcher of water. Some monks say what it isn't. Some monks describe what it can do at length. One monk says nothing, instead, he simply kicks the pitcher over with his foot; he is declared the winner.
What a koanvoluted way of gatekeeping, don't you think? ;)
What's a teacher to do when the lock to the gate is in the student's mind?
Good question. What kind of gate are we talking about though? How umm.. how gateful are we talking here?
Why, however gateful do you need to be? Tis a tease, a tease! Be as gateful as you please! Meander round it 'nd walk about, or walk right through it, in and out!
I like you.
I like you, too. Cheers, mate! 🍻
And on death and decay.
Being Christian or going to church doesn't make you a good person any more than a speed limit sign prevents people from speeding.
I think if a being like lucifer exist and is truly evil then it has tricked these 'christians' in to worshiping it instead of the god.
Good chance what we call the Satan at some point we're originally a god from a pagan religion, like Beelzebub for example. If they were good that depends, if they were replaced in the first place perhaps that old religion was worst compared to what predates Christianity, another thing also is perhaps replaced because were forced to by the invaders.
Dat Demiurge be at it again
The concept of good and evil is actually very limiting and tends to raise people with twisted worldviews. Most intelligent people learn that morality is complex, reality is not black and white, and to wish harm upon others to ensure personal bliss is rather sociopathic and fucked up.
Christianity faces a major foundational dissonance. Early tribalist (in group, out group thinking) values that have to coexist with radical empathic universalism. They usually ignore the development of Jewish traditions, and it took priests centuries of dissertation to mesh both views together. But they are incompatible. To believe in clearcut good and evil, and also things like a reward heaven (an idea also eradicated in most Jewish tradition). One must learn to suspend empathy for the fellow human being. To be happy while knowing others are harshly suffering (aka "they deserve it"). To think that one's own cruelty will be forgiven just by saying a magical incantation is also fucked up.
Now, the solution given to it is not widely accepted, and is the source of schisms in different Christian cults. Jesus's message is that of universal forgiveness with radical empathy. The abolition of heaven and hell. But many intermediate concepts had to be inserted to make it make sense with organized religion. Like sin forgivenes through repentance, second coming prophecies to delay the forgivines, apocalyptic prophecies to delay the abolition of hell and other exceptionalist interpretations.
Anyways, I started rambling, but Christianity is incapable to be internally consistent as it is. And some dogmatic views require people to be actively assholes by definition.
I think about this all the time. He probably just believes in science and kindness.
You should read Revolt of the Angels.
Have you ever read Paradise Lost?
Since he's the one driving them, you can't wonder too much