From what I understand, it was a ticketed VOD stream and was never uploaded to YouTube. I don’t think you can buy it anywhere, but there are file sharing download links in some of the top google search results.
The question is ... which one is the good angel? and which is the bad? ... or are they both bad? ... or both good? .. or do they just randomly change positions and perceptions every time you need them?
Welcome to the wide-wide world of moral relativism!
There is no good or bad, just differently moraled. These two shoulder spirits advocate for different actions with outcomes of mixed better and worse consequences.
Makes sense. You need fat (energy) to build and maintain the muscles. Muscles get used as energy source first, fat second, because fat is for emergencies.* Which is why muscly without fat looks so fake (and ugly imo).
* At least that's what i was educated for cows as a farmer, no clue what the fitness guys learn nowadays.
No, your body prefers fat as an energy source. Turning muscles into energy is a lot of effort for your metabolism, and building new muscles when you refeed also.
Uhm, no, it builds first fat, needs fat as an "ingredient" to build muscles (makes no sense to build all that muscle if you barely have enough energy to survive). Then burns preferably muscles. Fat is hard to convert, protein (muscle) is easily accessible (bodybuilders take protein as supplement). You need excercise and not just starving to lose weight, no?
And btw, even just keeping muscles needs more energy. Fat not.
No, muscle protein synthesis needs amino-acids. Fat is not used to build muscle
Then burns preferably muscles
No
Fat is hard to convert
Not nearly as hard as it is for the body to atrophy muscle mass, turn the proteins into amino-acids, and turn those amino-acids into glucose and then ATP
protein (muscle) is easily accessible (bodybuilders take protein as supplement)
It isn't, and the digestion of whey protein supplements can not be compared to muscle atrophy
You need excercise and not just starving to lose weight, no?
At this point I'm sure you're just trolling, because that couldn't be further from the truth
And btw, even just keeping muscles needs more energy
True
Fat not
Keeping fat cells also uses energy, just not nearly as much as muscle mass
If you wanna know my credibility on this topic I would suggest a look at my profile picture
being bisexual is being attracted to two very specific types of men, and all women- those being femboys and "i know it when i see it but it's certainly not muscle dudes"
Ah yeah, that was dumb, I should've specified that you can do that, if you're looking at the post in the Lemmy web-UI.
The button would take you to the webpage of the original post, so before it got federated. Images often load when I do that, because my instance has an image proxy that's sometimes at fault for loading errors. If I'm interpreting your screenshot correctly, slrpnk.net has an image proxy, too.
Maybe your app has a different button to open the original post, or a button to open the Lemmy webpage for the post in your browser and then you can click the rainbow pentagon there...
I'm sorry, does that man have a tattoo of a derpy wolf with an overbite?
Is that Courtney left and Shayne right?
Looks like Ian in the center so it could be a Smosh bit.
Anthony Padilla’s Funeral Roast.
Oh I didn't saw that one
From what I understand, it was a ticketed VOD stream and was never uploaded to YouTube. I don’t think you can buy it anywhere, but there are file sharing download links in some of the top google search results.
I'm more concerned with the fact that it appears he's just had his left nipple surgically removed.
Where are your nipples, friend?
A MILF and a Roman Gladiator?
I'm on board.
The question is ... which one is the good angel? and which is the bad? ... or are they both bad? ... or both good? .. or do they just randomly change positions and perceptions every time you need them?
Yes
He's good at being bad and she's bad at being good.
Sounds a lot like modern Christianity.
No, that's more like: "bad cop, worse cop."
i got that reference dot jaypeg
They're both very bad in very good ways..
Sounds a lot like The Satanic Temple
Welcome to the wide-wide world of moral relativism!
There is no good or bad, just differently moraled. These two shoulder spirits advocate for different actions with outcomes of mixed better and worse consequences.
At a certain age every ILF becomes a MILF.
the problem being?
Tbh muscle-y dudes have never really done it for me
This might be my favorite comment on lemmy
Thank goodness on behalf of dudes like me.
Visually nothing; but being embraced by them is a whole 'nother story. I can practically feel my spine realigning just thinking about it.
It depends. Muscle underneath a small layer of fat is amazing.
Makes sense. You need fat (energy) to build and maintain the muscles. Muscles get used as energy source first, fat second, because fat is for emergencies.* Which is why muscly without fat looks so fake (and ugly imo).
* At least that's what i was educated for cows as a farmer, no clue what the fitness guys learn nowadays.
No, your body prefers fat as an energy source. Turning muscles into energy is a lot of effort for your metabolism, and building new muscles when you refeed also.
Uhm, no, it builds first fat, needs fat as an "ingredient" to build muscles (makes no sense to build all that muscle if you barely have enough energy to survive). Then burns preferably muscles. Fat is hard to convert, protein (muscle) is easily accessible (bodybuilders take protein as supplement). You need excercise and not just starving to lose weight, no?
And btw, even just keeping muscles needs more energy. Fat not.
No, muscle protein synthesis needs amino-acids. Fat is not used to build muscle
No
Not nearly as hard as it is for the body to atrophy muscle mass, turn the proteins into amino-acids, and turn those amino-acids into glucose and then ATP
It isn't, and the digestion of whey protein supplements can not be compared to muscle atrophy
At this point I'm sure you're just trolling, because that couldn't be further from the truth
True
Keeping fat cells also uses energy, just not nearly as much as muscle mass
If you wanna know my credibility on this topic I would suggest a look at my profile picture
Lmfao Yes.
being bisexual is being attracted to two very specific types of men, and all women- those being femboys and "i know it when i see it but it's certainly not muscle dudes"
Ian from smosh has really rebranded.
Fairly certain that is literally Ian from Smosh. Flanked by Courtney Miller, and Shayne from iCarly (both also from Smosh)
No, no. They've got a point.
The Emperor's New Groove reference. SICK
Image won't load for me :(
Here ya go, hope this helps :)
In what way did I hurt you? Did I fuck your dad or something? :(
I guess I'm just a little bit broken on the inside.
Click the rainbow-colored pentagon...
Where?
Ah yeah, that was dumb, I should've specified that you can do that, if you're looking at the post in the Lemmy web-UI.
The button would take you to the webpage of the original post, so before it got federated. Images often load when I do that, because my instance has an image proxy that's sometimes at fault for loading errors. If I'm interpreting your screenshot correctly, slrpnk.net has an image proxy, too.
Maybe your app has a different button to open the original post, or a button to open the Lemmy webpage for the post in your browser and then you can click the rainbow pentagon there...