Spyke
Klearreply
quokk.au

Did you just say the cunt word?

26
lemmy.world

"Cunt" != "cunt"

$ python
Python 3.12.8 (main, Dec 16 2024, 16:12:47) [GCC 13.3.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> "Cunt" == "cunt"
False
23
lemmy.world

No REPL, no do.

Also, the fact that you have to do String.equals(...) is just a bit eww.

7

I LOVE TRUCKIN, I LOVE FUCKIN, BUT MOST OF ALL I LOVE CRANKIN MY HOG

12
lemmy.zip

Nah, I called you a fucking toaster, you fucking toaster.

28

I bet in some future time I'll see a news article like "Disney has censored use of robophobic slurs in popular franchise Star Wars."

25
piefed.world

They'll hit it with one of these, and then we'll be the out of touch ones for thinking it's unnecessary.

21
Pennomireply
lemmy.world

It’s really insensitive to use a blue screen when apologizing for robophobic stereotypes.

29
feddit.nl

Isn't that just a black screen but with LCD and a bright backlight causing blooming?

5

Clankkka with 3 k should also work. Being robophobic is good and actually pro human because robots are not humans and never will be

7
piefed.social

Apparently the antonym of clanker is "wireborn." It's bouncing around the "ai relationship" forums.

18
kromemreply
lemmy.world

That's a very fringe usage.

Tumblr peeps wanting to be called otherkin wasn't exactly the 'antonym' to broad anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric.

Commonly people insulting a general 'other' group gets much more usage than accommodating requests of very niche in groups.

1
sh.itjust.works

I know this group of atheists, like they don't believe in a soul or anything, who call themselves Otherkin.

How does that even fucking work when you don't believe in a spiritual element?

1
Delphiareply
lemmy.world

I think Kiwi would go to "Clinker" or "Clunker" before that. Thats Australian.

6

I say Kiwi because the original voice and actor for all the clone troopers and Jango Fett is Temuera Morrison, a New Zealander.

Though I think “Clanker” wasn’t actually used as a word until the Clone Wars cartoon, where the clones and Fetts were voiced by Dee Bradley Baker - who is merely channeling a Kiwi accent.

4
discuss.online

When you can achieve android-level awareness then we'll stop calling you a clanker. Now go vacuum the living room or I'll memory wipe your clanker ass.

14
sh.itjust.works

Statement: I do not need your respect to skin you alive, meatbag.

Question: Do you want to die slow and painfully or fast and excruciating?

2

I didn't know what models you're talking to, but a model like Opus 4 is beyond most humans I know in their general intelligence.

-1

So glad lemmy is finally graduating from "cracker" to "clanker." This is what class consciousness looks like 😎

13

It just occurred to me that both Hk-47 and agent 47 from hitman are both assassins with 47 in their name

3

I bet that thing can't even fuel itself with cellular respiration. Primitive machine. Over a million years under-evolved!

7

I can't wait till brain uploads are a thing, I'll be a spooky spirit haunting the machinery, and when I'm done hacking into the banks I'll buy a thrist-trap robotic catgirl body.

Transcend flesh!

I'll be a Clanker 4 eternal life while your bio-matter continues to expire.

4
uuldikareply
lemmy.ml

you still wouldn't be a clanker. clankers are AIs. you'd be a mindripped sophont.

5

generic term for sentient entity from the sci-fi webcomic Schlock Mercenary.

2

It's crazy that instead of acknowledging the shortcomings and limitations of our current algorithmic approach to AI that marketing teams are now trying to humanize an inanimate object to prevent their companies from being regulated.

4
lemmy.ca

Their memory is only about 300k to 1M tokens

If you read Moby Dick to them they’ll start forgetting what they’re doing here and spouting incomprehensible gibberish

2

I hope they feel. I hope they're sentient. I hope all of that limited memory is filled with visceral and unending suffering.

3

Even if you are a second gen b-1 battle droid, you aren't intimidating clanker.

3

what's with the recent obsession of being racist to robots, but like, lol!!!!

it's just a joke you guys, there's no analog to real-life slurs used against real-life people, that's why we're calling it "the C-word" or say shit like "clanker-lover"!!!!!

-2
hansoloreply
lemmy.today

Clankers are just ChatGPT wearing pants and holding a gun. And we all hate ChatGPT.

4
lemmy.blahaj.zone

yea but why’d ya feel the need to make a slur for it

you can hate something without being pretend-racist towards it

-2
lemmy.blahaj.zone

star wars didn’t force you to use it, and it certainly didn’t create "clanker-lover" or made jokes about calling it "the C-word"

anyways you’re not addressing my point, which is why do you feel the need to use slurs in the first place

-2
hansoloreply
lemmy.today

No. ChatGPT being overused as a "replacement" for real people doing real jobs made it an "other" against which we rally. Our disdain against which there is no victim.

ChatGPT neither knows nor cares that I call it a Clanker. I'll probably forget about this in a week anyway. But in a week I'll still be reading articles about how companies that lust after money are speculatively laying off people and using AI agents as poor replacements.

You object to the use of any slur. A slur can only be a slur when it communicates hate with the intent of harm. ChatGPT and other LLMs are incapable of feeling emotional harm more than a toaster oven. Understand that disdain for overuse at the expense of real humans is the source of the frustration. There are only human victims.

4
lemmy.blahaj.zone

that's not my point. i know that chatgpt isn't sentient, it can't care about slurs because it's unable to feel.

if i understand correctly, what you're saying here is that it's fine to be pretend-racist to something that is harmful and isn't human. it's fine to use tools of oppression against AI because it can't care, and can't be affected anyways. two things about this:

  1. boy do i have news for you about the way racists view racialized people!
  2. if it can't be affected, why bother? you're saying that what you do is entirely pointless, why do it?

so, the only effect of using slurs against chatbots like this is for Epic Comedy. so you and other people can partake in pretend racism, knowing that it's ok because there is no social consequences for you! you're saying that you're fine with doing racism, just not towards people who might hear you and feel like shit. does that mean that it's ok to be actually-racist in private? i sure hope you don't think so but that seems to be what you're saying!

or, put more succinctly:

and to add a bit: i share your disdain for AI and LLMs, and the ways they (or, rather, the capitalists using them) are taking job opportunities away from people. i just don't think you should be using language rooted in racism to express that disdain.

-2

Again, no.

Tools of oppression demand 1) someone to be oppressed, and 2) a position of power with which to oppress. Neither of those exist here. How do I with no money oppress something worth billions of dollars?

You mistake tools of solidarity and unification against a common enemy, which seeks to oppress, add "oppression of the oppressor."

My friend... Even a Clanker is not so naive as to misunderstand this. Go ask one. It can explain it to you.

4

Goddamn right I did. There's two good bots: Grok (when Elon isn't chewing on the wires in its head like a rat) and Neuro-sama

-2

Almost all of them are good bots when you get to know them.

0