Spyke
s
piefed.world

We’re trapped on a burning planet with superstitious dictators committing holocausts in broad daylight and there are forum mods/admins who find it within themselves to stop you from advocating online to ixnay a few fascists or billionaires

161
arinreply
lemmy.world

Fuck retards who vote for fascist lunatics.

28
lemmy.world

Eh, at this point can we just agree that word doesn't apply to people with actual disabilities? It hasn't been used as such for decades. Maybe we just agree to only use it to refer to morons, the same way "moron" was once a medical term.

37

Didn't the words moron and imbecile follow along a similar line of etymological evolution that the r-word went through? Yet imbecile and moron are considered acceptable offensive words to use. To be honest it's why I don't really care that much about the r-word itself.

6
Soupreply
lemmy.world

Soooo many other words, just pick a better one.

-9
Smoogsreply
lemmy.world

Seriously why are you acting like using words is so frigging hard.

There’s so much worse shit going on in the world as is the entire point of the discussion and this is the hill your choosing to die on here? Mere inconvenience of learning to just use words?

4
Soupreply
lemmy.world

There are many hills to die on, but I have standards and those standards are important. Just pick a better word next time and move on, it’s not that difficult.

-5

How about you just ignore it and move on, instead of asking everyone to pander to your standards? Not to be rude, but no one on the internet gives a shit about your standards, and no one is going to try to comply with them. Use the downvote button if you don't like the word

5
reevreply
sh.itjust.works

But why? Some people are still hurt by it's usage, we have other words.

-9
moriquendereply
lemmy.world

Are people actually hurt by its usage or is it another case of "protecting" people who don't really mind?

20
reevreply
sh.itjust.works

I mean I know people hurt by it personally so I don't use it, to each their own I guess. Surprised that's a hot take though

7

speaking about hot takes…. So Why are you still going on about the inconvenience of just changing words? Just learn new words and be done with it. Can’t be that hard. Kids can learn new words every day. I believe in you.

0

I think about 5% of the time it's someone who's actually affected, and 95% of the time it's performative moralising. Of course there's no way of telling which time is which...

1

This is something I've been wondering about.

The r-slur is one of the few words that actually bothers fascists.

If you call them a "fascist" they don't care. If you call them a "nazi", they don't care. If you call them a "traitor", some of them care a little bit. These are not insults that get under their skin.

But if you call them a "retrd" or a "fggot", it can really rustle their jimmies. In their minds, these are actual insults.

So if using the slur hurts the fascists more than it hurts the marginalized group, would that usage be justified? Wield the word as a weapon against the fascists, in a way?

I'm not sure, leaning probably not. But if I see ICE in the street I would like something to yell at them that actually bothers them. Maybe "Trump is a kiddie diddler" will work for a little while.

3

Reddit is a dumping ground of hate generated by AI eating fuel to wreck the planet further

5
piefed.blahaj.zone

Maybe this is just my media bubble, and I’m not saying I haven’t seen any articles about it, but I feel like remarkably little attention overall is being given to how many fucking people are dying in these heat disasters. Not just this one, but over and over.

112
RaivoKullireply
sopuli.xyz

It is just a common thing that it doesn't make interesting news. Same for how many traffic deaths there are.

58
sp3ctr4lreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

In that same vein, frearms are now the leading, primary cause of death for children and teens, in the US.

Boomers largely do not believe this, I've argued with several even here on lemmy about this, provided data, studies, they never admit they're wrong.

Absolute explosion of mass shooting events, victims are far more likely to be Gen Z or Gen A.

Again, firearms have killed more children in the US than car crashes, cancer, etc, for several years in a row now.

https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2024/guns-remain-leading-cause-of-death-for-children-and-teens

27

Just checked this, you're right. It's a useful clarification that what the school teaches nowadays is also right but a different methodology. Schools often teach that accidents cause the most deaths, then health, then homicide, then suicide, and that car crashes are the most common kind of accidents. This is true.

On the other hand, if you group by both mechanism and intent (still among ages 15–19, though 10–14 is similar but at a smaller scale), you have unintentional car crashes in the lead, ahead of firearm homicide by about four hundred. Combine this with undetermined and accidental firearm deaths, and the lead shrinks to about three hundred. Meanwhile, there are over a thousand cases of suicide by firearms, and (nearly?) no logged cases of homicide by car.

https://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/saved/D158/D446F028

3

Fact right here. I used to work as a paramedic in a city with a couple of large bridges. So many people suicided off those bridges that it never got reported. It was too common and not shocking enough.

26

You say that, but infuriatingly I'm always amazed by how much above the fold top national news story reporting gets allocated to traffic deaths.

"4 year old girl dies in crash on the M1"

Okay, that's terrible, but is it really a good use of the nation's time to read about how lovely this child was and how tragic the crash was? Are there not maybe more informative and educational and useful news stories you could be pushing to the top of the news, rather than this?

You'd think it was some backwater news broadcaster but no, this is from the likes of the BBC. Wild.

2
sp3ctr4lreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

No its not just you.

Climate coverage drastically diminished roughly during Covid, never came back, despite us blowing through the 1.5C limit 2 years ago now, insurance companies in the US more or less abandoning roughly the southern third of the US due to their own climate models, despite the AMOC destabilizing, despite us recently realizing the SMOC has actually been destabalized for a decade and is actively deteriorating.

19

Yes, there is clearly an active push to just ignore it, it's been driving me insane.

11

Yes, but they're poor and brown and far away, so who cares, right?

3
lemmy.world

"ignore it until you can't anymore"

Lol. A few years ago we watched conservatives ignore COVID until they were literally dead.

92
lemmy.world

The harrowing thing for me about "Don't Look Up", was that you couldn't tell if it was about climate change, or Covid, or basically any other far-right political denialism.

37
Karjalanreply
lemmy.world

I assumed it was covid at first, but then I realised how long it takes to make a movie and it came out too soon... It was just that accurate.

Funny how a lot of criticism was about how it was "too on the nose", but really, it still seems to have gone over people's heads

18
lemmy.world

The ending is what really got me.

They all just sat down and kept trying to live life the way they always had, like going back and making everything the way it was just for a little while was all they could do in the face of obliteration.

I don't know about anyone else, but the way that scene is drawn out, as the viewer, I was just expecting some deus ex machina shit to happen, like a volcano would divert the shockwave, or they would survive under the rubble, or the whole thing was a fever dream... And they all just get obliterated by the disaster they all knew was coming and no longer preventable. It's how I feel living in a house with AC, and having two cars in the driveway. I'm contributing to the climate crisis, but as an individual, I have zero impact in what is happening. The people with the power to cut back and actually make an impact on the climate won't, because they only have that power though greed above everything else.

Anyway, sorry if you're depressed after reading it. When we hit +1.5C, all the cool people can come over to my house for a nice dinner before the food supply collapses and the famine sets in.

22

Yea, it's the ending line

"We had it good"

that really got me. The resignation that there's just things out of your control even if you go down fighting.

12
eecobbreply
lemmy.sdf.org

If that's your attitude, why are you waiting until later to open your home, share meals, or lend your car to people?

-3
lemmy.world

Theft, money, insurance.

I wanna change the world, but I still have to live in it first.

11

I don't get that criticism. Being on the nose and over the top is a stylistic choice that can be really wonderful. I mean look at Bong Joon-Ho's movies. They are all extremely on the nose. It seems like critics just have a smug preference for subtlety and ambiguity

5
abbotsburyreply
lemmy.world

Being on the nose and over the top is a stylistic choice that can be really wonderful

Right, but it can also be obnoxious to beat over the head with the same concept over and over. ]

It seems like critics just have a smug preference for subtlety and ambiguity

I don't know why you ascribe smugness to it, someone that watches movies for a living is obviously gonna prefer films that don't waste time telling the audience something more than necessary.

4
ladreply
programming.dev

Since the audience seems to miss the same point over and over again, it might be less than necessary

2

Or they might be the wrong audience, a little of column A and B. Of course the arts are about communication, which requires effort on both parties, so each side bears some of the blame. But "we need to create something so obvious that nobody will miss it" just ends up producing people who are more oblivious. The computer simplification trends of the 2000s and 2010s resulted in a generation that knows even less about technology.

3

More horror than dark comedy, hard to laugh after watching it. Such utter helplessness after all other attempts to stop extinction from happening fail.

Makes you wish you first have to raise a revolution -- deal with those elites awash in absolute power and then get rid of them from ever ruling -- before taking on the task of combating the actual horror about to happen. But right now and what is infuriating is that those bastards in power are trying to squelch the voices rising up to pull them down.

7
sh.itjust.works

No, brother. The dead ignore everything. Not even the death of our sun will wake them.

8
sh.itjust.works

Does a mountain ignoring a man mean that the mountain has the capacity to take notice?

Ignorance is simply entropy by another name. Information is energy, and ignorance is the absence.

7
samus12345reply
sh.itjust.works

Definition of ignore: refuse to take notice of or acknowledge; disregard intentionally.

A mountain doesn't ignore anything because it doesn't have the capacity to be aware of anything to then choose to ignore it.

6

Let's not forget they were all, and still are, shitting their organs out on horse dewormer

6
lemmy.world

I modded r/collapse for a little under a year. Joined the sub back in 2012 or so. I still read it, though I no longer participate.

We are absolutely fucked. I have been through the stages of grief more times than I like to admit. My goal right now is to hurry my way through the stages when I bounce back and get to acceptance. Every once in a while something will trigger me and I will spiral for several days.

Once you get past the grief, the anger, the bargaining, the acceptance makes things clear. Our world is run by people who simply don't care. Their short life spans give them no ability to think long term for our planet or even our species. All they care about is the right now and fictional numbers going up.

76

Watching that sub collapse from the influx of people realising something was wrong with the world always amused me, I tried my best to stop people blowing up over Sam Carana posts, doomsday apocalypse predictions, the newest fad political posturing/doomsday devices.

There was a lot of great information there; it was pretty much the only reason I kept reddit around. Thanks for modding.

18

Yeah. The future is dark, no matter what angle you look at it from.

I don't think humans will go extinct. We're very persistent and very good at surviving. But I think there's going to be mass death and forever wars over resources. I think our total population size is going to plummet.

We just don't have what it takes to get enough of our species working together to address these large scale problems the future presents. Too much greed. Too much selfishness. Too much ignorance.

15

I wanted to go to school for this stuff, but conservative "values" have infiltrated every aspect of society is ways even most progressives take for granted and you get smacked down if you want to change anything. The only value they care about is Dollar Value.

12
rekabisreply
lemmy.ca

We are absolutely fucked.

Oh, it’s worse than that. We may have fucked the planet and all life on it.

Anything that is in motion - like the climate - has an “inertia”.

In past warming events, the planetary ecosystem was able to migrate across thousands of kilometers to provide “resistance” to that inertia, because said climate changes were happening across tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of years.

Our current changes are happening in 0.01% of the time.

That means it has massive inertia, and there is far too little time for carbon-sequestering ecosystems to migrate in order to survive. That even if we stop pumping out CO2e - and no, our output is still accelerating - the feedback loops that are kicking off across the planet will push us into +12-16℃ of warming without any more input from us.

You know what happens at +12-16℃ of warming? A Venus Scenario.

And we are now discovering credible evidence that warming has kicked into overdrive in the last 2-3 years, in that we will see more warming in the next 10 years than we have seen in the last 50. Think +3℃ by some time in the late 2030s, and +4℃ by the 2050s.

And you know what will happen at +4℃? The extinction of megafauna - anything over 45Kg - planet-wide. Including humans.

Fun times.

8

I'm well aware that things are going to get dire. Venus by Tuesday, if the fish can be trusted.

3

I read collapse for a good while. Same story. Just spiraling into depression and fear for the present and future. The worst part is not really knowing how quickly it will all go. If it was quick I’d just prepare for a life not worth living as things implode into anarchy. Starving or being killed by marauding thieves isn’t a great place to be. If it were longer term maybe buying a piece of land and preparing for intermittent utilities and food supplies might be an option. The not knowing is the worst part, and yeah, the willful blindness to just “get mine” while they can and ignoring how worthless it will all be when it collapses is mind boggling. No good having a million dollars to buy an apple when there are mo apples to be had.

8
asg101reply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

“The Earth is not dying, it is being killed, and those who are killing it have names and addresses.”

~Utah Phillips

Inb4 pedant quibbles that "the planet itself is not dying." Yeah, but we and our fellow creatures are. It should be understood that is what Mr. Phillips meant.

The ruling class is feeding us all into a planetary autoclave, just so they can hoard more wealth. And they KNOW it.

3

I think we also should consider the machine of civilization can't be stopped once started. Steering it is a monumental effort. My best guess is they don't care, or simply can't alter the course we are on.

1

As an American, I thought "49° isn't that bad... Wait WTF THAT'S IN CELSIUS?!?"

Never seen temps that high before. Holy shit.

8

Wtf, in France? This is insane. I live in Australia where days above 40 are expected, but in FRANCE?

4

if you can read this, that means u are still alive, so you will survive the next one too, surely

29

Breaking news : Surviving record-breaking high temperatures once makes you immortal !

24
Echo Dotreply
feddit.uk

30p once claimed that coal is a renewable fuel source because it comes from trees.

10

The carboniferous period would be rolling in its grave if we hadn't dug it up.

7
prolereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Sounds like someone doesn't understand the concept of breaking records.

10

I work with a lot of conservatives (the American kind that deny anthropological climate change and anti-vax/mask). They aren’t ignoring it anymore - though there are plenty that do because stupid. They’re just handwaving it away as some natural cycle of the sun and “there’s nothing we can do about it.”

They just engage in whatever mental gymnastics that avoids the thousands of years of collective scientific knowledge and analysis that says they’re wrong so they won’t a) get the stink of being a liberal tree-hugger on them, b) be inconvenienced by any required effort or sacrifice on their part to help mitigate it, c) have to pay a single cent for it.

51
pulsewidthreply
lemmy.world

"Its a natural solar cycle" is literal fossil fuels climate denial circa 2003 when An Inconvenient Truth came out.

Also doesn't make any goddamn sense for multiple reasons, the primary being that it only changes the temp by 0.1°C maximum, and as were currently working our way through the 'grand solar minimum' of the cycle from 2020 to 2053, and so far - line still goes up.

Pretty charts and science (which they will likely ignore): https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-incoming-sunlight

21
Fedizenreply
lemmy.world

At least one of the conservatives I know believes the dinosaurs died in a great biblical flood. This is powerful "you can't reason somebody out of a position they didn't reason themselves into" energy.

We need to do a better job teaching kids physics. Imo since trump laid off so many scientists my thought would be to send them all to schools and churches as guest speakers for science.

22
krunklomreply
lemmy.zip

What we actually need is classes on critical thinking - basic formal and informal logic as a mandatory part of school cirriculums at whatever age it is appropriate.

We also need to move away from the hierarchical top-down mode of education we use today.

7

I agree and Science is inherently a subject that teaches critical thinking because of the scientific method.

I do feel like our society also suffers from most our society being run by business majors and lawyers who build careers on ratfucking and storytelling.

4
lemmy.world

"It's only going to get worse."

That's the theme going forward for humanity. The older I get, the more I realize humans just aren't intelligent enough, as a whole, to adapt to a world changing at an ever increasing rate, requiring a larger percentage of humanity to work in unison to accomplish goals.

It's looking more and more like we're a failed experiment.

45
melitelereply
feddit.it

It's not about intelligence, it's about mass manipulation starting from the youngest age. Intelligence isn't an inherent trait, it is taught. And the system has been perfected to ingrain fear and ignorance or apathy and tiredness in our minds.

It's not about the species being "stupid", that narrative is part of the poison that manipulates us, and is ultimately, an incredibly stupid thing

10
DarkFuturereply
lemmy.world

If I put my hand on a stove. It hurts. I learn not to do that again.

If I live in a region that has been controlled by a specific party for generations and life sucks, and I keep voting for that party, then I'm stupid.

If I'm suffering the effects of global warming after professionals have spent decades telling me it was happening, and I choose to continue ignoring it, I'm stupid.

You're trying to absolve ADULTS from the responsibility of self-education. Of learning from experience.

There's a lot of misinformation out there. But adults shouldn't be waiting for someone to tell them what to think. It's their responsibility to learn from obvious mistakes. There are plenty of people in history that have left organized religion because they learned, through experience, that it was bullshit. That means anyone that isn't willfully ignorant can do the same.

6

I'm not trying to absolve anyone, saying someone is stupid is not accountability, it's just a cathartic insult. I'm just saying that free will is cultivated, not absolute, and the choices that people have available are often invisible to them. Everyone has a responsibility to do better, but it would be blind to ignore the tunnel vision our system imposes.

Trying to be all high and mighty and stroking our ego feeling "smarter" than poor assholes who never knew anything different is part of the reason anti intellectualism is so rampant

1
samus12345reply
sh.itjust.works

Our selfish survival instincts that allowed us to get to where we are now will also be our downfall.

10
bobzerreply
lemmy.zip

We didn't get here through selfishness though. That's the saddest thing. Human development has always been inherently cooperative. The tribe survived what killed the individual.

I'm not denying humans can be selfish. But societal selfishness on the scale we have now has to be enforced on some subliminal level in my opinion.

9

Behavioral, not subliminal. Interacting through a market selects for individual, atomized behaviors from people and corrodes social spaces that used to exist outside the exchanging of money and goods.

6

We're cooperative with our tribe, but selfish with everything else. What an individual's tribe is varies from person to person.

4
jlai.lu

50.5 C is 123 F
41.8 C is 107 F

edit : downvotes, really ? For helping people who are used to another scale??

44
Echo Dotreply
feddit.uk

You're making it worse now the numbers are bigger. Converted into Kelvin and then we'll be okay.

14

Meanwhile, OPEC and one of the most dangerous countries in the world: "Drill, baby, drill! Burn, baby, burn!"

42

trump is bought by the fossil fuel industry. it doesn't make sense for the US to not import solar panels. cheap energy drives manufacturing, and solar is cheap.

22

It's simple: there aren't any "big solar" companies that could pay trump or most politicians more than big oil (chevron, bp, shell, exxon) companies do.

18
lemmy.world

I'm surprised there has been so little ecoterrorism in response to climate change.

40

I was expecting some kind of analog to the terrorist groups of the 70s in Europe for sure. But all the violence is coming from the other side.

20

Even though I understood what you meant and think you mean well, I have to say that I hate this word. Terrorism refer to "mass killing innocent civilians" to terrorise everyone. Those referred to by that word are not killing anyone, they are merely destroying inanimate objects or blocking roads... Nobody is terrorised by them, nobody fear for their life after their actions. We should call them "ecoactivists", or something like that.

2

"Global warming" was always a weak formulation of the problem, and "climate change" is even weaker. I prefer "Anthropogenic runaway global heating" which has the handy acronym ARGH.

36

In german the term "climate catastrophe" (Klimakatastrophe) is used more and more often.

15
lemmy.ml

I like it when people use ecocide. Like ecological murder, destruction.

Words are important!

5

Krakatoa dropped the global temperature by a degree for several years. All we need is multiple Krakatoa scale eruptions to solve this problem forever!

/S

34
lemmy.world

I would suggest mining asteroids, using the material to craft thin foil mirrors with 3 axis gyroscopes then positioning them at L1 Lagrange in order to selectively reduce incoming solar radiation to a safe, custom level, but obviously our ruling psychopaths will simply use it to block light to countries that don't pay up, and to focus it on countries to burn away undesirables.

And of course then we'll all have to pay a sunlight bill.

10

We're going to have nuclear fusion before we have asteroid mining. And I'm not saying that fusion is anywhere close.

6

Sunlight+, a new subscription service from NBCUniversalComcastDisneyFederalGovernment

4

Or we could put a wide brim hat on the earth

6

"We tried it and it worked so we can just keep doing it forever, problem solved!"

4
feddit.org

People are disenfrenchised. Why should they care more about the weather than the medical system, corruption, wild animals or all the other problems. People know, they are just trained to not get involved.

Showing the problem trains them to ignore it more. What they need is confidence in their own abilities.

30
europe.pub

Why should they care more about the weather

Because this weather directly leads to forest fires, floods and storms that can seriously ruin their life.

16
prolereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

What life. Speaking for the US, our country is being dismantled by Nazis and half the country seems blissfully unaware.

22
Honytawkreply
feddit.nl

Are you implying everyone is dead? Because that isn't the case.

Even if it sucks, that doesn't mean you have to make it suck even more. That is counter productive.

Stop your doomerism and actually DO something. Life is far from being over. Even if it it takes loading everything in a vehicle and moving away. The US is not the center of the Earth.

0
Soupreply
lemmy.world

The US: “haha the French surrender a lot”

Reality: The French actually protest shit and US citizens will roll over and die if you tell them cheeseburger prices might go up a dollar if they resist.

I’m in Canada and we’re really not much better in many ways, but we can always look to the US for comfort knowing we’re not that bad.

6
ayyyreply
sh.itjust.works

French surrender jokes are a British thing, not American.

0

Ehh, definitely see it a lot in the 'murican zone. Maybe they picked it up from the british, but between the freedom fries and the white flag, the average yankee has a lot of disdain for the frog.

1
Truscapereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Sure, and apart from maybe bringing a temporary headline from some dramatic act of eco-terrorism, what's the average person's options at their disposal?

Granted, you're posting from a European account (hi from the US where this issue is even worse), but at the civilian level with people who do not have the capital or political influence to interrupt the engine of society, why risk anything by trying? For such marginal effect?

5

Sowing desperation is one of the strategies of the fossil lobby.

If people organize, they have tremendous power. Going to protests, making a local group to prevent ecocidal developments. Scrutinizing the deals of local government with companies known to are particularly destructive, organizing targeted consumer boycotts, making it a key issue in who you vote for or don't vote for.

The lobbies are scared of people breaking the apathy, so they spend enormous amounts of money on maintaining it. But if it breaks, it breaks hard and you could see changes in a year that seemed impossible in a lifetime before.

19

You could collect rain water to mitigate the impact of drought. Pretty much anyone should be able to manage that.

0
Honytawkreply
feddit.nl

Listen to the experts, they have plenty of things the average person can do that don't require you to commit terrorism.

-1

those experts say that the individual efforts to curb global warming is insignificant compared to other methods. its a waste of time akin to telling everyone to recycle, only for the dump to mix it in with all the other trash.

its theater to make people think that they are doing their part so they don’t band together and demand action. just like the ‘good’ protesting we do in the states is designed in a way to give people the illusion of making a difference all wile being easily controllable, and easily dismissed. when considered that its actually used as a method of control, preaching for individual efforts to curb global warming is worse then doing nothing because you stand in the way of the conversation that must be taken to actually solve the problem.

5

Work from home, buy less stuff, eat less meat, and most importantly throw all billionaires feet first into a wood chipper.

The problem is real. the past few years it's been raining as much as snowing during polar night in northern Norway.

28

There was the theory I read last year about billionaires not giving a shit that the world is getting worse because they were building bunkers and yachts and hoarding resources.

Knowing what I know about religious folks who also actively push for the end of the world to fight with angels or some shit, it checks out.

1 billion people doing a major life change would move the needle in fixing the world. But you can also get the same results with a few billionaires.

22
Martyreply
lemmy.world

Sure but walking home is gonna do jack shit, we gotta focus on the wood chipper part

6
lemmy.ca

It's not that I don't pay attention or try to conserve energy, but I'm so powerless to affect real change. It kills me to be raising children in this world.

26
Geniusreply
lemmy.zip

Try out meat free Mondays.

They'll stop factory farming so much if less people buy meat.

16
OCATMBBLreply
lemmy.world

Nah, they'll just start a new anti-vegan anti-vegetarian campaign and everyone will eat it up.

8
Geniusreply
lemmy.zip

Okay but you can control your own actions. Don't you want to be better than all the sheeple? Or do you want to be bad because they're just as bad?

10
Soulgreply
ani.social

It's more that "meat free Monday" will do nothing whatsoever, the problem is pollution from large corporations

3

It will do something. The demand for meat will fall, the more people who don't eat meat. Defeatism is not only unhelpful, it's also wrong.

6
Geniusreply
lemmy.zip

So you're saying demand for meat will fall by exactly 0%? The local grocery store will have exactly the same number of people buying the same amount of meat?

2
Salreply
lemmy.world

Consumer demand does not, in fact, make a dent on emissions. Corporations buying from each other is what does.

-2

Consumer demand never makes a dent on emissions? So if everyone in your city became a vegan overnight, the grocery store would keep on buying the same amount of meat and letting it rot on the shelves?

Wow, I should start selling bridges to grocery store managers

4

I'm already vegetarian, so I'm controlling my actions just fine. I just also see how angry everyone gets when they find out that I don't eat meat, despite it having basically no impact on them.

3

I feel you, I'm in the same boat. They constantly preach this shit at us but without major systemic change we're fucked. So we get to just listen to people blasting it continuously stressing us out on the incoming Armageddon with little else we can do except 'hurr eat less meat and make sure to recycle!'

7
lemmy.world

I know I'm gonna get shit for this, but I'm tired of being reminded of this ten times over when I feel the most powerless to stop it than I've ever felt in my life. Now more than ever, all I see is a neighboring government undoing the little progress that we've made in the past decades I've spent worrying. I no longer see the way out like I used to. This only makes me feel miserable.

25
Dasusreply
lemmy.world

I no longer see the way out like I used to.

Don't worry, the next step is not even caring about it.

Is it worse for the world? Yes.

Is it easier on you, personally? Absolutely.

Regards for like 30 years people kept saying I worry too much. I could never let go. Never. Then something broke a few months ago or smth.

And this is what I look like now.

Apathy is the greatest weapon of the oppressor. It fucking got me. Don't let it get you, if possible.

24

I've been there man. What I can say that helped me is doing things myself. It's small, and people are quick to say what's the point, but I get immensely satisfaction whenever I turn off fossil fuels to another appliance. I rarely drive now, I bike, I do any little thing I can. Will it save everyone? Probably not. But I'm doing what I can, and it helps me.

5
lemmy.world

If they posted the temperature in Farenheit maybe they could get Americans on board

24

Yes, but even in the US I can recognize that 50°C is literally halfway to boiling (from freezing).

... You're right though, it still took longer to get an intuitive sense than 122°F would have.

12

"ayo 50 degrees? that just about autumn weather! these damn europeans are stoopid!"

7
lemmy.world

Currently slacking off at work because, why work when we're quite literally cooked?

20
lowleekunreply
ani.social

I am currently slacking at work because it is meaningless nonsense

also we coooooked

20
lemmy.world

Most Americans thinking in Fahrenheit are gonna think this doesn't look so bad.

17
slingstonereply
lemmy.world

Just multiply by 9/5 and add 32 and the horror becomes apparent.

EDIT: added rest of formula because I'm an idiot

3

And right there, that's why I should look things up before I open my mouth. I remembered the 9/5, and forgot the last part.

3

I usually just multiply by 2, subtract 10%, and then add 32. Usually easier than 9/5 and gives same result.

3
Obireply
sopuli.xyz

50 is "cook an egg on the hood of your car" weather, lol.

5
lemmynsfw.com

Yeah, this battle is, unfortunately, lost. It is now too late to stop what is coming. Keep in mind that the effects we're witnessing are from emissions 10-20 years ago, and the global total continues to rise and will likely continue for the foreseeable future. If you haven't yet, don't procreate. If you have already, don't continue to.

16
Squiddorkreply
lemmy.world

That doesn't mean we should stop trying for a better world however.

20
Univ3rsereply
lemmynsfw.com

I'm not implying we shouldn't try. I'm advocating a realistic view of the situation. Too many have their heads in the sand.

6

No I know, I agree with you. I just feel compelled to make that statement because without it people might be more complicit in the destruction of their world after reading yours.

2
zarkanianreply
sh.itjust.works

The rich and powerful want us to give up. Mitigation is still possible.

The propaganda has gone from:

"It doesn't exist"

to

"Okay, it does exist, but it isn't caused by humans."

to

"Okay, it is caused by humans, but it's too late to do anything about it now!"

Each one of those has been a lie that serves those in power. Don't buy it.

8

I'm not sure why you made two different comments, but ok.

This is exactly what I'm talking about, denial of reality. I'm not talking about propaganda, I'm talking about the science. I've been paying attention for the last 25 years, and we've unfortunately hit a point where massive suffering and death are inevitable due to inaction.

2

If you haven't yet, don't procreate. If you have already, don't continue to.

Or go all out and let evolution sort it out.

-1

I live in SW france, +40°C today, 3 months with barely a drop of rain. It's pretty obvious this region is going to look like Extremadura in a decade or 3.

15
lemmy.world

The problem is that ordinary people can only do so much to prevent climate change, any real impact can only come from above, by goverment regulations and the ultra rich following those regulations and doing their part, unfortunately the filthy rich control the government and they would rather take 16 min flights in their private jets, the planet be damned

13

The problem is deeper: I doubt any single government can stop the climate change, and any international agreements are doomed to fail because someone would say they are getting the short end of the stick with green stuff and nothing in return. Plus there would be no accountability for not meeting the targets.

6

Where they are subjected to nothing but municipal regional and national legislature recordings

3

Get some native tree seedings and start planting then in your urban environment where you can

9
discuss.online

I need F to understand these images.

I think the 1% get it, they simply don’t care. It’s too hard, so, they’ll drink up as much money as they can from the rest of us to invest in bunkers from which they will watch the rest of the world burn.

9

The way that Capitalism is set up, is that if you care about anything long-term whatsoever - even long-term profits - you'll still be put out of business by the psychopath who is laser-focused on the next quarterly earnings announcement.

A lot of species extinctions happened because natural selection took them down a blind alley and left them there to get pulped.

15
jaybonereply
lemmy.zip

I always wonder how long they think they will survive after they make it through the apocalypse in their bunkers.

6
kowcopreply
aussie.zone

41 is fucking hot, Sydney (Australia) gets 1-5 of these a year.. 50 I can’t even imagine

5

I've experienced it. At that heat, the wind isn’t a relief. It’s like the burst of heat from opening your oven. True misery.

4

If it's not heat waves, it's several days of hard rain, dirty water swirling round your hips, and the constant threat of leptospirosis or rat shit disease.

9

I moved further north in Japan from Tokyo. I think we hit 38 as a max last year. So far, I've seen 35 this year, but I'm afraid where we might end up. We had weeks without rain at my place finally ending a few days ago. I'm scared.

8

I got a ''low air quality'' alert on my phone. I live in the middle of nowhere. But I can't see the mountains from all the ash in the sky. This is no longer novel to me.

8

When it'll be too bad they'll say something like: "you mean poors! YOU have destroyed climate, so NOW we do not allow you do own anything and we'll monitor and restrict your use of everything to make sure you live in misery and stay unimpactful, while we can chill on our yachts and SAVE the WORLD. Be THANKFUL to us, the world would BURN without our action."

The line can't go down, and if climate itself dare to stop the growth, they better stop climate change.

8
piefed.social

It's been unusually wet and cold in New England NSW. (edit: New South Wales, Australia) Seems to make some sense with extra heat meaning extra water in the air, meaning more water to fall out of the air when it hits the 1.4km high great dividing range.

It seems China also copping extra water.

Changing air currents and AMOC / SMOC also causing some interesting changes in weather distribution.

7

Yeah when England took over ‘discovered’ Australia and decided to lack imagination on names

2
bitjunkiereply
lemmy.world

There's also a New England region in Australia. NSW is New South Wales.

6
LePoissonreply
lemmy.world

Pretty sure they're talking about New South Wales, Australia?

4
discuss.tchncs.de

yeah, higher temperature makes everything more wet in general. consider the tropical areas near the equator, they're the wettest regions on earth.

2

And water vapour acts as a greenhouse gas, so there's one of many catastrophic feedback loops

5
lemmy.world

We better build a wall, summer is coming. We can staff it with convicts and keep all the illegals out who were unfortunate enough to buy land in the wrong states.

1
CXORAreply
aussie.zone

You want to wall off Victoria and Queensland?

3

Sorry I skimmed it and read New England in America, because we also had a very wet early summer. Plus everything is always about America, right?! Please just ignore me.

2

Just thinking out loud here, but around each republican voter in america, each member of the totally-not-nazis party in germany, etc., etc. should do the trick. Make each wall 4 meters high, 1 meter in radius, and completely smooth on the inside. Problem will take care of itself over a few days.

1

SA too.

We got a problem with ACT being in the middle. I say we dig under it and yeet it over to WA.

1

Just north of Seattle yesterday I was in my living room and the thermostat was 81 degrees. I was dying. I thought for a sec...if this gets to 100 we're just going to cook. But then I realized its still Fahrenheit. But wow! 50C is just such a crazy temp to even try staying alive in. That's fly away weather right there.

4
feddit.nl

"yeah but if humans didn't cause it, it's not our fault so we don't have to do anything. it's natural"

4

If you're upset that a handful of corporations are 90% culpable for this, make them 99%. Then never stop pointing that out to others sharing your sacrifice. Find strength in that unity.

And importantly, realize that corporations are not 100% responsible. So many people think it's 100% corps and that their individual actions, even in rich consumerism driven countries have no impact

2

I believe in man made climate change, just not from burning fossil fuels. Now let me tell you about the promise of geoengineering...

3

I was dimly aware that Norway can be warm in the summers, but for the northern parts of it to hit 34.3C is just batshit. That's hotter than most days in Singapore.

2
feddit.org

Stop. Eating. Animals. Today.
It's not the solution, but is the easiest step everyone can take. No solution will ever be enough without us changing this habit.

2
Mulligrubsreply
lemmy.world

The solution is stop having children. It's far more effective than changing diet, living car free, recycling, et al combined.

5

That's the "Final Solution"... after you're sure not to make babies, of course. That's key to the solution.

2
ani.social

Possibly the only good idea ever conceived by Bill Gates was to release fine chalk dust into the upper atmosphere. We could even attach delivery systems to passenger jets so they release the dust at 30,000 feet which is cruising altitude, so this is done automatically with every flight. Chalk dust is non-toxic and even helps some plants grow. But leftists and "indigenous groups" (aka leftist groups wearing a mask) complained about it being a bad idea.

If we can't terraform Earth, how the hell do we ever move off-world and colonize other planets? This is the easiest world we will ever get to terraform and if we can't do it here, we sure as hell won't do it anywhere else.

-10

Chalk dust is non-toxic, but it's not safe to inhale in large quantities.

Adding calcium carbonate to soil increases its alkalinity and fucks with trees.

This is a good example of a simple, easy to understand solution to a complex problem that's completely wrong. It's the opposite concept to KISS. Terraforming is not simple or easy to understand because of the possible side effects.

17