Spyke
curatedtumblr·Curated TumblrbyChloé 🥕

on the male loneliness epidemic

::: spoiler Show transcript Screenshot of a Tumblr post by nongunktional:

when i first heard about the male loneliness epidemic i was like oh yeah close camaraderie and bonding between men is often discouraged in favor of competition or, if not discouraged, at least filtered through a lens of individualism that precludes deep connections. and then i learned what people meant by it (men arent getting laid) to which i say skill issue

to all the men out there not getting laid: try less hard to get laid and try more hard to be an enjoyable and relaxing presence :::

View original on lemmy.blahaj.zone
programming.dev

Going anywhere in public to socializing is expensive as hell, third places are dead, and the primary way people meet potential SOs is through apps whose purpose isn't to make anyone happy but to extract maximum value from them.

There are people who are off the deep end, yes, but the answer isn't to attack them like this. That's never going to snap anyone out of it, and there really are huge societal problems that are resulting in people withdrawing, which is obviously bad for their mental health.

211
jjjalljsreply
ttrpg.network

This is one of those "people hate every piece of capitalism, but refuse to connect the dots to see the picture" things.

107
lemmy.world

I found a local private club where drinks are cheap and there’s tons of regular customers. Feels like what the Cheers bar seemed like on TV.

29

It’s pretty great. Everyone is really chill and if you just want to find a comfy chair and read you can do that, too.

I can’t wait for football season, not because I particularly like football, but because I like watching football with everybody.

And a few drinks and a couple appetizers are like $60, tops.

Oh, and the bartenders know your favorite drink and will just start making it when you walk in.

7

Loud enough to hear but quiet enough to talk to someone across the bar.

And it’s got one of those jukeboxes where you can pick the song and there’s not many people so you’ve got a good chance of hearing it.

And folks who aren’t there will pick a song to let their friends know they’re thinking about them.

6
lemmy.world

third places are dead

I've heard this line quite a few times. But... as far as I can tell, camping is still absolutely a popular past time. Parks and beaches are still a thing. Gyms and bars and clubs are as crowded as ever.

This reads much more like a meme than reality.

There are people who are off the deep end, yes, but the answer isn’t to attack them like this.

There's a lot of mass media that's screaming at people about how women and men are natural enemies and the only path to intimacy is through sexual assault.

Absolutely attack this ideology. Drag your friends back from it if you can. Mock and deride the notion if you can't. Don't tolerate the intolerable.

there really are huge societal problems that are resulting in people withdrawing, which is obviously bad for their mental health

Absolutely. So throw a party. Invite people out to do things. Mix and mingle.

-28
Crisreply
lemmy.world

Mocking and deriding people is very effective at radicalizing them, please do not do that, it consistently makes the problem worse.

I get that they would deserve that behaviour if they are advocating sexual assault, but if you care about that person, or the cultural issues they're succumbing to, or the rising sentiment that men have to be rapey to ever have success with women, please don't do that, it's detrimental to the cause.

51
lemmy.world

Mocking and deriding people is very effective at radicalizing them

To your side, certainly. That's how hazing works. Exploiting people's insecurities by calling them cucks and betas while presenting a facade of success and popularity is the Andrew Tate Special.

Piercing that bubble and outing fanatics as weirdos is necessary if you want to break their grip. If you're tolerating abhorrent behavior - or, God forbid, rewarding it - you're reinforcing it.

-17

The key point here, however, is that exploiting insecurities through insults is not the only thing that Andrew Tate does.

He simultaneously messages to young men that they are weak/poor/unhealthy/cucks/betas/etc, but also that they deserve more, that it's not entirely their fault that they're not getting rich/women/success/etc, and that if they do xyz, they'll fix themselves. Solely insulting them isn't what makes the messaging effective, it's the putting down of their current position in life while simultaneously promising a solution through notions of them having things like sex or money "taken" from them.

It's certainly okay to mock or insult ideologies that are harmful, and to do a bit of that to the people that promote them, but only doing that will only radicalize them away from you. Think about these 2 scenarios:

Scenario A: "You're worthless, you'll never be anything, you're poor, a virgin, and will die alone"

Scenario B: "You're worthless, you're poor, a virgin, and you'll never be anything unless you follow these x steps to become a better man"

Scenario B is what Andrew Tate uses on young men. Scenario A is pure harassment that doesn't motivate anybody on its own, Scenario B motivates action.

If you just ridicule a friend that has negative beliefs and don't present any alternative, they will stop being your friend. If you deride them for sharing a harmful belief, then explain the alternative and how it would make them better off, you're more likely to get them to actually change. (though this is, of course, not universal, and I'm sure a small subset of people could be motivated to change purely off insults and nothing more)

I hope I explained that well, I'm quite prone to rambling 😅

27
Crisreply
lemmy.world

That sounds like an extremely good way to ensure they cling even tighter to the lies sold by the Tates of the world

Antagonism is extremely effective at shutting people off from change. If you antagonize someone and they actually change, they almost certainly could have been better reached through compassion.

And when, like the vast majority of people exposed to antagonism, they don't? You have now convinced them anyone outside their bubble is unreasonable and cruel, and given them a sense of persecution they will reflexively hide behind any time they're confronted with an outside perspective

15
lemmy.world

That sounds like an extremely good way to ensure they cling even tighter to the lies sold by the Tates of the world

That's because you've bought into the right wing propaganda. The endless campaign to coddle fascists has only ever produced more fascists.

-8
sh.itjust.works

Holy, this thread is a mess. If you think all men who struggle dating are fascists, this conversation ends here. If you accept the fact that not every man not in a relationship is a fascist, then we can talk. More specifically, we can talk about how the point isn't to "coddle fascists", but rather to not antagonize new men into the arms of Andrew Tate and others.

Is someone with social anxiety, therefore struggles dating, a fascist? You might know a far-right socially anxious guy, sure, but that doesn't prove anything beyond the fact that this one person is a fascist. I'm not sure how it's right wing propaganda to say that generalization is bad. But I'm also not sure whether you realize an issue (in this case, men struggle with relationships) can have more than one cause.

9

Word. I'm demisexual and greyromantic. The idea that any guy who isn't dating or may have trouble dating is a fascist is inherently aphobic.

2

If you think all men who struggle dating are fascists

No idea where you got that. But I do see a lot of fascists who alienate women as friends and partners, then grow resentful when they don't receive "respect" they feel they deserve.

This can quickly escalate into stalking and further violence against family or ex-partners, unless other people intervene.

The idea that a violent misogynist shouldn't be argued with or deterred, because their sense of superiority is more important than anyone else's safety is what's brought us to the modern fascist moment.

Is someone with social anxiety, therefore struggles dating, a fascist?

If "social anxiety" means lashing out at women in order to force them to comply with your demands?

Absolutely.

-5

Dead isn’t precise enough. Expensive is generally what they mean. Along with many free spaces being dead.

Having to spend money to socialize is a concern for many. Often times this is a lack of a car too. Or lack of public transportation. Sprawl, Stroads.

It’s a multi variate thing when people quip that third places are dead.

39
lemmy.world

I mean, the answer is that it is both. Like, not having close friends sucks. And not getting laid sucks. And both are valid and legitimate things to complain about.

Like, honestly, the "skill issue" take is super toxic. It's basically the same as telling a poor person that not being rich is a skill issue. The lack of understanding and compassion for peoples' legitimate problems will only radicalize them further.

152
lemmy.world

It's not both because "not getting laid" has nothing to do with the male loneliness epidemic and is not what people mean when they talk about it

38
feddit.org

It's clearly both. Men who are lonely tend to not get laid, either.

23
Epherareply
lemmy.ml

Getting laid is an activity that does involve other humans, so it certainly is a method of combatting loneliness. But if it's not as part of a partnership, it hardly does anything for some of the deeper cutting problems that are described as the "male loneliness epidemic", particularly not having anyone to share your struggles with...

15

The issue is that for a lot of lonely men (probably most), the issue is social ineptitude, hangups and all the issues in modern life that make forming connections hard. That impacts their ability to form friendships, find romantic partners and to get casual sex.

Some men might be able to get casual sex but not friendships, but I doubt that's true for most.

9

For me, while getting laid regularly doesn''t actually solve any of the other problems in my life, it is like an "easy button" for being happy. Things have to be pretty bad for me to get upset when I've had sex in the last few days or expecting it soon. Unfortunately I've never been able to maintain a relationship where that is the case so it ends up having the opposite effect until I eventually end things and go back to being just mid all the time.

3

I'm getting laid regularly and also incapable of joining voice chat with my best friend or inviting them over.

Yes I'm in therapy, it's helping, thanks.

11

Also tend to be a less "relaxing presence", creating a bit of a negative feedback loop.

0
lemmy.ca

So it's misnamed?

What do we call the epidemic where males are lonely in general? We ... are discussing that very real problem affecting the minority sex, right?

Right?

4
lemmy.world

the men who won't man up need to be told to man up, especially if they tried to man up by imitating a child predator fascist.

-50

That language will get you nowhere fast. Given that this post is meant to highlight toxic masculinity and its negative repercussions, “manning up” is the furthest thing from what they should do. Redefining what it means to be strong is closer

28

"redefining what it means to be strong" is stupid

maybe reconnecting with strength and disparaging weak conceptions of strength

-3
ThorrJoreply
lemmy.sdf.org

I cannot fucking wait for the day Lemmy ships the "blocking an instance removes its users from comment threads" feature.

6
ThorrJoreply
lemmy.sdf.org

the problem isn't the good people on .world.

the problem is the endless horde of dipshits on .world who need to do a lot more detox from shithole social media like reddit, and stop spewing their ignorance into every comment section they infest in the meantime.

since they won't stop doing that shit at anywhere near the rate necessary for me to enjoy & derive value from this place, I will be removing them from my default experience the instant that option becomes available to me.

it's on the good people of .world to either help their compatriots self-improve, or find a less shitty instance. because when it comes right down to it, there are a hell of a lot of good people not on .world for me to talk to, and that's plenty. the ones who stay indefinitely on a shitty instance are not irreplaceable. not by a long shot.

0

I think you're funny, spewing your impotent frustration. At least I actually want men to man up.

-2
lemmy.world

What is this place anyhow? I get pushback on .world for telling feminists that men's problems won't be fixed if they understand the patriarchy harder, and here people are defensive of the notion that politics made some men really shitty.

Did a bunch of lonely men end up here instead of lemmy world?

0

You are making the mistake of anthropomorphising communities. There are no singular trains of thought here. There are just people of many sorts posting messages for others to read. Full stop.

Yeah ok but you are not immune from having a local culture sorry

leftists of ALL sorts (which is its own entire topic of how freaking diverse that is),

so is it like the subset of leftists that isn't outright commie?

You seem to be using politics as a cudgel against men instead of attempting to understand the social forces that are creating this problem in the first place.

yes, because using the cudgel is preferable to endlessly theorizing

You can pretend to not understand all you want, but your ignorance won’t be tolerated for long here.

🫡

0
lemmy.zip

And by dismissing their very real issues as a trivial matter not worthy of even discussing, you've now pushed them into the arms of people who make false promises and exploit them.

Congrats, you shot yourself in the foot.

4
lemmy.world

I'm not saying that punishing politically toxic men is trivial, I'm saying it's worth doing. You can't make a man change by pandering to him, you have to actually communicate with them directly, or they'll tune you out.

-4

What you're doing is not communicating with them. You're preemptively dismissing them as your enemy and then acting surprised when they walk towards those who are acting welcoming.

"Not immediately insulting them over their voiced concerns" isn't pandering...

5
shalafireply
lemmy.world

I get you. Some of these boys need to be told to get out there and get scared. Everyone wants to huddle in their comfort zone, and to hell with anything or anyone that drags them out. That's a toxic black hole. If you're not experiencing some discomfort and fear, you're not living life.

Had to break myself away from that black hole today. Went out to my camp. Ah fuck me it sucks out there in the summer. You gotta bathe in bug spray, and reapply constantly. Thought I would stroke out several times. Got some walking and shooting in, got some work done, came home and showered, feel great. Imagine if I had sat at this keyboard all day talking to you fuckers. Downward spiral.

Bravery is being scared and doing it anyway. Be brave.

-15
shalafireply
lemmy.world

Good lord are you worked up with assumptions! I say again, young men need to get off the coach and get out their comfort zones. This is a thing anyone can do. You don't need 2 acres of swamp, you can go walk till you drop, talk to a girl, go somewhere you're leery of, anything that scares you will do. We can't experience bravery without fear, and we can't live a full life without bravery. Anything less is merely waiting to die, and no one deserves that.

I'm not blaming these men, and if we're making assumptions, that smells like victim mentality. Fuck all that. As I said:

these boys need to be told

How to encourage them to get out and purposefully be uncomfortable? I have no ideas. But it has to happen or we lose a generation to ennui, depression and reclusive dweebs. Again, downward spiral. That's a hella gravity well to escape.

As active as I am, been fighting it for a year since I lost my job. Young guy across the street and I were tight a couple of years back. Now he sits and plays video games all day, growing fatter every time I see him, zero social life. What am I doing? Chatting with you people. I'm certainly not helping him. Best get off my ass and eat my own dog food. Charity starts at home they say! :)

And don't for one fucking second lecture me on privilege. I understood and internalized the fact of my luck and status since the 90s, since long before society at large started talking about the concept. You been alive that long? How many stories you want where I felt my privileges in my very guts? I am well fucking aware, thank you for your concern.

You are way out of line and owe me an apology. That's not a thing I say online, but you have wronged me, put me in boxes I don't fit in or deserve.

-1

(Can't edit my own posts)

Just texted the guy. Nah. He just jumped in a game with some people. See what I mean?! He's getting fatter and more antisocial by day by day. He's in his comfort zone, totally unbothered. I'm not baggin' on gaming, but outside a part-time jobs, that's all he does!

-1
sh.itjust.works

I've only rarely heard it used as a shorthand for "I/we/you can't get laid". I've always interpreted it to mean the first thing. OP isn't wrong about the second though, honestly. It is a skill issue.

31

Sure, there are a minority of people who have legitimate physical disabilities that make it difficult for them to get laid, or impossible to have sex at all. I was under the impression that we were discussing the general case, though. I'm not going to prefix every comment I make with a statement about the exceptions when I'm speaking casually.

It makes conversation awkward and difficult to follow, because you have to dig through the throat-clearing and ass-covering to figure out what the person is trying to say. If you want to discuss those exceptions, feel free to bring them up, but if you feel that I'm ableist for refusing to pad out all my comments with performative acknowledgements to satisfy your asinine sense of morality, then I don't know what to tell you. Well, actually, I guess I do: "No".

2
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Right, it's very early and I rarely (if ever) have a sexual appetite, so Imma need clarification: how is getting laid not a skill issue? It is my understanding that if people want it enough, they find ways to change themselves or their circumstances to make it happen.

-3

Just like how if people want to be billionaires enough, they find ways to change themselves or their circumstances to make it happen. People only have partial control over who they are and the circumstances they're in, and the changes they're able to make don't always make a difference here.

5
lemmy.blahaj.zone

depends on your circles. in feminist and leftist circles, it usually means the first

but most men outside of those circles use it just to mean "im not getting the dates i am ENTITLED to 😡"

2
Beaconreply
fedia.io

I don't know who gave you that idea, but it's incorrect

59
Flamekebabreply
piefed.social

Actively wanting to date someone less intelligent than oneself feels like predatorial behaviour.

20
Sergioreply
lemmy.world

I can't believe people are downvoting you, I totally heard something similar about some guys who don't like dating women who make more money than they do... It's just kinda funny to see "PhD" sticking out like that...

6
LiveLMreply
lemmy.zip

She has higher education -> She earns more -> "She can't be earning more than me, I'm supposed to provide for the household!!!!!"

I assume it's something along those lines?

2

Perhaps it's a self worth thing. If she's making more than you, what reason does she need to keep you around if someone else comes along?

1
lightnsfwreply
reddthat.com

I haven't got along well with any of the women with PHDs I've known but it wasn't a very large sample size for me to write them off as a whole. If I ran into too many more that had the same personality type as the ones I met I might consider it though because they were frustrating to be around. It wasn't that they were smarter than me, it was that they wouldn't even listen to me on subjects I was more knowledgeable about.

1
Septimaeusreply
infosec.pub

Most who have pursued a PhD, and all who attain it, are the lost ones.

These poor souls live only a half life now. He was right to fear her.

16

We have walked through the valley of insanity, bashed our heads on the walls of frustration only to seek the next valley, the next wall for we thought we glimpsed enlightenment only a decade ago and have dreamed of it since. Sayeth not whether one draws close or hath traversed a false path. Half a life! Bah! A whole life and more is demanded and others too drawn in, burn thy candle from every end lest thou be cursed with an eternal postdoc and irrelevance.

PhD=permanent head damage lol.

7

"She has spent many years pursuing one small insignificant thing. Surely she will not give up on me any sooner!"

e: the more I think about it, the less sense it makes. wouldn't even the manliest man want an advisor who is smarter than he? What Arthur does not have his Merlin? What Corleone does not have his consigliere?

4
cheezyreply
lemmy.ml

She has kids

I understand this perspective only if someone wants to remain childfree; it's impossible to compromise on having kids or not, you either do or you don't

If it's just because he only wants his own biological kids, I'm less sympathetic

8
gollireply
sopuli.xyz

Depends on the specific circumstances, but i feel like it can be just as much of an issue, if you want children and don't even care if they are biologically related to you.

Depending on how much the other parent of ones stepchildren is involved in their lives and their age, taking on a parenting role might not be wanted or even allowed. So you might have children living in your house, but won't ever have a complete parental relationship with them. You will always have that additional relationship that needs to be build around, whether that be vacations or where you live.

2

That's fair - I suppose there is more complexity & nuance for those situations than I initially thought about

1

Honestly, though, that sounds like an avoidant attachment style. He desperately wants intimacy, but it scares the bejeezus out of him, so he unconsciously finds a way to sandbag every potential connection.

4

And you listen to them to figure out what's correct and what isn't?

26

Oh, so it's just the deliberate misunderstanding of a nuanced term, like what they did with toxic masculinity.

21

You got that backwards. Feminist and lefty leaning circles routinely dismiss the first as the second which is partly responsible for pushing young men further right.

5

The problem is we live in a society pause for laugh track

Where men are told they have to get laid or their personhood is questionable and women are told they must never get laid or their personhood is questionable.

The result is that heterosexual men are frustrated, cisgender women everywhere are afraid of anything with a penis, and dating men as a transwomen is pretty fucking easy because men are tired and desperate.

Source: Am Transwoman

93
jagungalreply
aussie.zone

Trans people always have the greatest insight into these issues. Thank you!

22

I guess it comes from being between the typical roles.

The same predjudice also appears to apply to gay people.

6

Do you have any idea how many femboys just went for me? I have to reject them all as it won't work out, but I appreciate it I guess.

Meanwhile, a handful of women went for me. Like, I'm fine now with whatever happens. I simply accepted that people are different, and we don't all have to have the same lives.

3

I'm tired of this bullshit attitude. It contributes to the very issues it diminishes. Men are allowed to have problems without being incels.

91
deaf_fishreply
midwest.social

It's not all men's fault, but there are things you can do increase your chances. If your problem is that you never shower, then who is going to date you?

-32
deaf_fishreply
midwest.social

Ok, what is the emotional problem?

For example, if you easily get upset and attack other people for little reason, then who is going to date you?

If it is that you get sad sometimes, lots of people would date you.

-7
deaf_fishreply
midwest.social

Fascinating, you seem to be telling me there is a problem with my though process, but instead of just telling me specifically what it is, you choose to insult me instead of answering my basic questions.

Is this the emotional problem you have?

-3

I have nuance, I have not claimed there were only two emotions. I gave an example of only two emotions. I know there are more than two. I just decided not to write them all out because they are uncountably many of them. That is also why I asked you, what specific emotional problem we are dealing with. So that we could get specific.

0
gmtomreply
lemmy.world

This is peak

"Well if you dont want to be homeless you should get a job"

Energy.

11

No, it's more of "If you want to increase the probability of being in a relationship, you can work on yourself." energy.

-7
lemmy.world

The Tumbler OP is 100% not a man, if they were they‘d know not getting laid as a man is very often not a personal skill issue. I know many young men who are conventionally attractive and emotionally mature who just kind of have lost interest in dating even though they generally want a relationship.

I totally understand that between job/school, social media biases, self-worth doubts and economic insecurities, the incentive to navigate through predatory dating apps and toxic left/right bubbles just to meet another insta reels addict is minimal.

Staying single however makes you neither bloom nor gloom, it‘s just okay. Which is something I‘ve learned not to complain about given the current state of the world. Maybe someday I‘ll reconsider…

86

I've definitely been there quite a few times. I can get by romantically, but sometimes I just don't have the energy. Finding someone you mesh with can be exhausting.

I have a handful friends of varying genders who seem to be in similar boats. I can't be sure as I haven't asked. It seems like the current options are inadequate for a good chunk of people.

15

Which is something I‘ve learned not to complain about given the current state of the world. Maybe someday I‘ll reconsider…

This is where I'm at. I have enough stress in my life without adding all the extra crap that comes with trying to date to it. Sure when things are going good it's amazing but that never seems to last and then you end up in limbo trying to evaluate whether it's worth stringing it along or ending it.

10
Eccentricreply
sh.itjust.works

Assuming a roughly equal number of straight men and women, either a large amount of women are consistently sleeping with a small number of men or the same number of women are not having sex as men. The former is a pretty common incel assumption that would require women to be a hive mind, so imo the latter should be more true. In my experience as someone present in both male and female social circles, women tend to feel a lot more emotionally supported in platonic relationships while men tend to expect more emotional support from a romantic partner than a platonic friend. I think as a result, men tend to associate physical intimacy with emotional intimacy because they aren't really getting either from their non-romantic relationships. You can see this in the way platonic men are so much less likely to hug each other or hold hands or cuddle than platonic women. So to me, OP is actually onto something with their original assumption. Not getting laid isn't as much of a problem for women because they don't expect as much emotionally from sex and romantic relationships since their emotional needs are fulfilled elsewhere. Imo, male loneliness isn't so much a problem with modern dating or with women as a problem with the fact that social expectations placed on men are preventing men from feeling fulfilled outside of romantic relationships and sex. In conclusion, hug your bros and tell them everything will be okay and you're proud of them.

8
Clentreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

You've literally just explained what the male loneliness epidemic is and its causes. It's why it's specific to men and a women not understand the nuance here is no diffeeent the people not understanding toxic masculinity.

There is actually some overlap in these two issues and it's one of those rare moments where it's women who need to shut up and listen because it's not about them.

The loneliness epidemic is not a personal attack on women anymore than toxic masculinity is an attack on men. Ultimately, the loneliness epidemic is about reduce the male suicide rate. Anyone who takes it as any attack is misinformed and borders on a self absorbed asshole. Might as well just tell these men to kill themselves.

The solution isn't for women to be more promiscuous because that doesn't fix the problem and isn't what anyone is suggesting is regards to this issue.

Casual sex does not cure loneliness for the majority of men. It may offer temporarily relief but even this isn't true for all men.

15

Someone else pointed out I was really uncharitable with reading your post, just wanted to apologise. I'll leave my crappy response up for some good ol public shaming

1
Eccentricreply
sh.itjust.works

The question I posited was: if all signs point to men and women having equal amounts of sex, why is there no "female loneliness epidemic" but there is a "male loneliness epidemic"? I posit that the reason we think of sex as a benefit for male loneliness therefore can't be quantity of sex but men must be getting something from sex that women either don't need or are getting elsewhere. Since scientific evidence points toward gender differences being social and not innate, there must be something women are doing different socially that leads us to think of men as a population as in need of sex or intimate relationships but not women. I'm presenting a neutral logical argument here by way of discarding illogical conclusions, not accusing anyone of anything or implying that the comment above me was accusing women of being too promiscuous. I just wanted to ask the question of why are straight men lonely but straight women not lonely even though logically the two populations must be dating and having sex at approximately equal rates

-1

Oh yeah you're right. I thought they were being sarcastic at points where I see they weren't. Sorry about that

1
lacaioreply
mander.xyz

It's about making the male feel special. You don't get it, do you?

-2
nekbardrunreply
lemmy.world

I'd even go further to say that the male loneliness epidemic is tied with homophobia.

Not as in the usual way one thinks of homophobia, but as in a fear to do all these things women can do among themselves without being labeled gay or shunned by social peers as being needy or similar things.

Or better saying, it is the fear of having platonic male-male relationship being seen as homosexual relationship (hence, homophobia).

2

I think that's part of it but less and less so nowadays and especially the younger generation. I think the aversion to physical or emotional closeness is more cultural memory at this point than homophobia, but it might still play a part. Like someone else pointed out, I think a big part of it is just wanting to feel a bit special but just not having existing avenues for support

2
gmtomreply
lemmy.world

I know many young men who are conventionally attractive and emotionally mature who just kind of have lost interest in dating even though they generally want a relationship.

Big mood. Not to try and jerk myself off about the cinventionally attractive part. But yeah modern dating has become so processed and transactional. As man it feels like you have to put so much work in and practically beg for a bit of time from someone thats git so many options that theyve started to objectify you and are basically just looking for any reason to pass on you and move on to the next person.

And then dating in person isnt much better. I never ever want to be the creepy guy that hits on a girl when shes just trying to enjoy herself, so unlesss a woman approaches me, ehich very rarely happens, im not finding someone that way.

And then dating from freinds has a lot of the same issues, i currently have a freind that i would date, shes given me some signals that she might feel the same way, but possibly also signals the complete opposite and since shes one of my closest freinds i dont want to risk ruining that freindship taking that shot.

7

Do it anyway. If she's really a good friend, it won't ruin the friendship.

Also the odds are high that you're going to wish you did later.

3
lemmy.ca

Dumbass take.

A "skill issue" take, is just a republican "personal responsibility" take.

It's dumb as fuck. How about you examine the systems that produce outcomes? Have you learned literally nothing from the last 50 years of the social justice movement?

84
Lileathreply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Most women tend to not want to form relationships with misogynistic incels. That's what's seen as a skill issue.

-8

Or men with autism or adhd. Cause that's who you target with "just be more social and enjoyable."

Men spending time to fix their financial issues instead of socializing up there too.

7
lemmy.world

Don't deprive the weak men of their agency. So many Trump toxicity 'outcomes' chose this.

-30
lemmy.ca

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feedback

The notion of cause-and-effect has to be handled carefully when applied to feedback systems:

Simple causal reasoning about a feedback system is difficult because the first system influences the second and second system influences the first, leading to a circular argument. This makes reasoning based upon cause and effect tricky, and it is necessary to analyze the system as a whole.

22
lemmy.world

The solution to a complex system isn't to fret about how complex it is, it's to cut the feedback loop.

Weak men who developed toxic politics are caught in a feedback loop. Cut them out of it. Not complicated, just abrasive.

But you can continue constructing your nuanced and sympathetic understanding. These men just need to be understood, that will help them.

-4
lemmy.ca

You're advocating genocide, or at least, one step away from it, and you don't even seem to realize it.

You also seem to have no grasp of how complex systems or feedback work, given that feedback is a necessary and inherent part of many systems and cannot just be 'cut out'.

Quite frankly, you're more toxic then most of the men you seem to despise.

3
lemmy.world

it does not follow from the marginalization of the other that every time you experience the marginalization of the other, it is directly connected to genocide. humans are more than ideal atoms, and some of them need to be communicated with in the language of harsh blunt truth.

Men who are unfuckable because of their politics need to man up. If you are spending several hundred words to say: "please integrate a more healthy relationship with masculinity" which is literally just telling them to man up with extra steps that they are uninterested in, you should consider that they are man enough to need to hear: "man up."

-3
lemmy.ca

You sound like someone who has read a lot and understood very little.

4

Sucks that men's issues are being treated as a joke or mischaracterized as something else and not important.

80
lemmy.world

Came here to say this.

I'm 42, happily married, and can't find/keep/make a friend to save my life. My wife is very anti-social/introverted and has a good number of friends.

I cycle between thinking my interests suck, or I must just be un-fucking-bareable to be around and completely oblivious.

Maybe both... Probably both.

49

Man, I feel you. I am genuinely jealous of people who can walk in a room and be friends with everyone in a few minutes.

9
vithigarreply
lemmy.ca

I'm in my 40s and made a number of new friends this year by getting involved with my local fighting game scene. If you're into videogames at all I'd suggest trying it, and if you're not into fighting games specifically there are absolutely people at your locals who will be happy, if not excited, to teach you.

Fighting games are unique among competitive games in that while there is no cooperative aspect in the game itself they have developed one of the most collaborative and friendliest gaming communities I have ever had the pleasure of interacting with.

7

I am 43, currently dating someone, but this is more someone to spend some intimate time with, and do things with, with neither planning on anything deeper. I guess a type of friends with benefits. My last relationship was very long and serious, but we both had some serious issues, I went on to work on mine, she spent a few more years not trying to get help, and then she spent a few years with serious improvement, but died late last year. So I am not really trying for anything deep.

I moved to were I am about 6 years ago, I have several new friends, a number of acquaintances I get along with at social events, and said girlfriend. This is how it has always worked out for me. I am not sure why. I do believe that growing up in a situation where I moved every couple of years, and thus had to make new friends every time, kinda play a big role in how I developed. On top of this I have the blessing/curse of not experiencing anxiety, this often helps in the beginning, but that lack of inhibition can also turn a lot of people off. However, that is me.

This being said one of the biggest differences I see between me, and people around me who have no friends, is that I spend time researching what is going on where I live, and then I participate in it. Often I don't even like what it is, but I would otherwise be sitting at home, so fuck it, might as well. Beyond this I go out of my way to talk to everyone, in a general group sense. I don't hone in on one person, and I keep it very casual. The critical thing though, is that there is reciprocal conversation. I ask them something "Oh, hey I am new here, how long have you been guys been involved in this?" I try to keep it to where I am asking, comfortably non-invasive, questions about themselves, and try and get them to talk about themselves, and hopefully their interests. Then you make yourself a regular, and over time, the conversation become much more second nature, and you slowly get to know each other better.

Another thing is that I know a lot of people just won't like me. That is fine. Even rude rejection is just a minor thing to me. I have been reject so many times that if I took it personally, well, I doubt I could deal with it. There are people out there with some sort of overlap between you and them, see if you can make this something. You need to view rejection as just a minor inconvenience. Move on. I see so many men who refuse to do the footwork to get this off the ground, and of those who do, I see many who display disturbing behavior over rejection. It is no wonder why women are scared to give definite answers, hand out fake phone numbers, and lie to create an exit for so many interactions.

Small talk is the gateway to real conversation. Finding places people go to socialize while doing a particular thing provides an immediate ice breaker, ie "Hey, I am new here, how long have you guys been doing this?", as well as a topic to discuss. Rejection isn't to be taken personally the vast majority of the time. Working on improving yourself is very important. Always be looking for things to improve on, discuss it. These places of interest are not obvious because society has decided you need to pay simply to be human these days, but unless you live in the middle of nowhere, there are things going on out there. Often these interest groups will meet at a designated house. If you can't find one that you enjoy, go to one based on something you have not done before. Tell people you aren't just new to the group, but to the whole thing. Get conversation off the ground by asking about the topic. You can make good friends from places created to do things you aren't really interested in. What I would do is if I can't find something that fits my interests, I look for things that are interests with a lot of cross over between that, and people who are interested in something I enjoy.

If you live in the middle of nowhere, and you are unhappy, and isolated, do anything to move away from that. It won't be easy, and it won't be comfortable, and it will be anxiety inducing, but that is all part and parcel of life. It sucks. Moving to places, and traveling is it's own set of skills. People who don't really do that, at least not often, can get overwhelmed with it. When I say anything I mean it. Sure, don't like do something particularly dangerous, but it will have to become a singular goal you spend your time working towards. Living in a tiny rural area, where you have no friends, no interests, and you are isolated, is a death sentence. Not always literally, but internally. This tiny place is what it is, and if there is nothing for you, it is to small to change in a way that will work for you. You need to get out.

If your work/life balance is way out of whack, you will need to put a lot of effort into changing that. I spent a lot of time working 70+ hour weeks. It was literally killing me. I began spending the very little personal time I had looking for work that gave me some hope of having a life. I would have to make a lot of material sacrifices, as I would make significantly less, but the restructuring of my life, in that direction, was the only way I could avoid dying from stress in my office. This shit sucked, and ultimately my life collapsed, but that is a whole other story. Point being, if you have no life because you work all the time, that shit needs to change, and it isn't going to be easy.

All of these things are skills, you need to practice them by doing them, and you need to learn how to accept failure, and course correction. You may also have depression, or other psych issues, and need therapy. Depending on where you are this can go from "well it's there" to "this is an expensive luxury". There is no real good answer here. Giving any real advice would require knowledge of all the things going on with you to make any type of recommendation.

5

I mean, it's welcome. But it has more to do with everyone is an asshole, and not worth being around really.

15
BussyCatreply
lemmy.world

The idea that men are struggling to find friends is a real concern that should be addressed, people being unable to find sexual companionship because people of their desired sex don’t want to be around them due to their personal choices is something that can be made fun of.

Many women want a guy who is pro choice, can cook, is able to hold a conversation that’s not about sex, is capable of having platonic female friends, has hobbies, and has decent hygiene.

If that is not something you can attain, that’s fine and there are still women out there for you but that eliminates a large percentage so if you want to be picky on top of that you are going to have a problem

-2
lemmy.world

The idea that men are struggling to find friends is a real concern that should be addressed, people being unable to find sexual companionship because people of their desired sex don’t want to be around them due to their personal choices is something that can be made fun of.

But conflating those two categories of men as if all lonely men are the latter, does no good to anyone, and only helps fuel misandric stereotypes.

37
BussyCatreply
lemmy.world

The conflation is the problem but in my experience it is more people who are blaming the former when it is clearly the latter

Like if you walk around with a maga hat and tell women your body my choice and also complain you can’t find a nice women to settle down that is a skill issue

-24

if you walk around with a maga hat and tell women your body my choice and also complain you can’t find a nice women to settle down

That's an absurd stereotype that obviously doesn't apply to the vast majority of lonely men, though.

Maybe the skill issue is in not realizing that.

P.S. Also, there are plenty of married couples who are both MAGA, and I myself had no shortage of single MAGA women popping up on dating apps when I was single who made it crystal clear they weren't interested in anyone who wasn't also MAGA, also anti-vax, etc.

P.P.S. Looked it up, and there are literally over two left-wing singles for every one right-wing:

Marital StatusLeaningExample Partisan Split (Historical Survey Data)
MarriedRepublicanRoughly 35% Republican, 32% Democrat
UnmarriedDemocraticRoughly 19% Republican, 41% Democrat

P.P.P.S. 'Your body my choice' was a meme for like three weeks.

24
sh.itjust.works

So tell me this then: When people hear that a man hasn't dated, why is the first thing that comes to your mind the assumption that "you walk around with a maga hat and tell women your body my choice"? Is that the only explanation? Is there no nuance in the world? If a man has never dated, is he automatically MAGA and anti-abortion?

10

It’s not the first thought, however when a person blames society for all their problems instead of making an effort to improve themselves that screams maga

Plenty of people struggle to date for a variety of reasons but the people out there calling not get laid the “male loneliness epidemic” are generally not the most normal people

-5

What about all the MAGA who got women? What did they do right?

4
bollybingreply
lemmynsfw.com

Pro choice, sympathetic to womens issues, good cook, able to converse about many topics, platonic female friends, hobbies, good hygiene, >6ft tall, healthy weight, reasonably attractive, good degree and then job.

That is/was me and I'm happily married, but it took 7 years of putting a lot of effort into dating before I met her, and I was not picky about who I dated.

The idea that men can easily find a partner by meeting a few basic requirements is divisive tribalist nonsense.

23
BussyCatreply
lemmy.world

It’s not that they can easily find a partner if they meet a few requirements it’s that lacking those requirements makes dating much harder and if you are struggling to get a girlfriend and when trying to think of reasons why it’s been hard and all you think to do is blame society instead of focusing on self improvement that’s a problem

Anecdotal evidence counts for shit but I’ll give it anyway of my friends/coworkers who complain “I can never find a good woman” about 3/4 have no hobbies where they ever interact with women and the last 1/4 fit the “I can’t have a normal conversation with a woman without trying to sleep with her”

Society itself does suck and it has made in person hobbies much less common with the death of the third space, isolating people through technology, and just how much it cost to live but I have never met a person who is even moderately social that has a hobby where they interact with people of the opposite sex, and has platonic female friends that couldn’t get a date in less than a year if they were actively searching.

Introverts need love too but if they look at their list of problems and rank “society hates men” above “I never see women in a social setting” that alone is their biggest problem

-13
shooreply
lemmy.world

The problem with "just get hobbies to meet women" is it's glaringly obvious when people are there to do that. You can't force yourself to enjoy an activity; you'll naturally do what you want, which is approach women.

I have never met a person who is even moderately social that has a hobby where they interact with people of the opposite sex, and has platonic female friends...

Kind of a pointless truism. Dating is a numbers game, more encounters is more success. You even admit it could take this prospect up to a year of effort, now imagine that you have to build that opportunity network from scratch.

10
BussyCatreply
lemmy.world

It is a pointless truism, and it is a numbers game which is why it’s so shocking people don’t see that!

So if one persons spends 1 hour a week with eligible women and the other person spends 10 hours a week with eligible women the second person is statistically much more likely to find a partner.

And if you spend only 1 hour a week with eligible women and instead of increasing that time you just decide to blame society that’s a you problem

There is also a difference between pretending to be interested in something to get laid and trying to find ways to do things you find interesting with other people

0
shooreply
lemmy.world

The time and energy investment to get those hours is not linear. Going from 0 hours to 1 hour is (by definition) a massive change. You're describing the solution as if there's an accessible way to make meaningful connections in the digital era. If it were as simple as described, we wouldn't have this societal problem because humans really don't like being lonely.

...a difference between pretending to be interested in something to get laid and trying to find ways to do things you find interesting with other people

What's the difference? Your advice never said the hobby needs to interest you. This whole conversation is about finding companionship and intimacy, not group hobbies.

Also, all of this argument puts aside that diving into new group activities is time and resource intensive. Having the time, flexibility and money to switch between them just to meet a few new people is an incredible privilege. It also inherently assumes you have access to these groups. Guess if you live in a social desert or don't have reliable transportation you're SOL and a loser for life?

3

You mention this as being because of the digital era but what about that is any different than 25 years ago? If you don’t have time to spend a few hours a week pursing a hobby how are you going to have time to be in a relationship? The cost of pursing hobbies is a real concern for lower income people but how has that changed? How were you supposed to date a person if you lived in a social desert with no reliable transportation before?

Maybe I haven’t been clear with what I am saying because you are grossly misunderstanding my point.

I am saying when you have a problem you should try and improve yourself to address the problem vs blame society. For example if you can’t figure out how to program in python: you could read about it, watch educational videos, or take a course. Going onto a message board and complaining that python is impossible and stating we are in a programmer epidemic while not trying to learn it first is bad. We can make the acknowledgement that python can be hard for some people to learn but calling it impossible to learn without having put in the effort is useless

0
bollybingreply
lemmynsfw.com

Nobody here is arguing that Trump supporters or stinky men who only care about women for sex deserve to have partners.

It's just that you and the OP don't acknowledge that finding a partner is hard for a lot of men who aren't jerks and have a reasonable amount going for them and the implication is that it's own fault and they must be a dick.

If you flip the genders and make a statement like: "if a woman can't find a decent man it must be their own fault. It's easy, just go and take up some male dominated hobbies and take a shower." Its an asshole thing to say, no?

So how about we try not to be assholes and have some empathy.

10
bollybingreply
lemmynsfw.com

I've looked and I don't really see that you have. You seem pretty dismissive of the fact that this group actually exists and quick to jump to attacking maga cultists and gross men who disrespect women - who nobody here is sticking up for.

1

Did you look two comments up when I said

“ The idea that men are struggling to find friends is a real concern that should be addressed”

0
LH0ezVTreply
sh.itjust.works

Alright, anedotical evidence time! I am aware I am in a bit of a bubble, as I try to avoid the local variant of maga as much as possible in my life.

But I know several single male friends who I would say are at least of average attractiveness, smart, funny, know how to use a shower and a toothbrush, have decent education/money, cool hobbies and are politically progressive. Also I know of at least three of them who are deeply unhappy about not getting into a meaningful relationship.

Sometimes people are just stuck in a life situation or a place with not many compatible options and ways to meet people.

18
LH0ezVTreply
sh.itjust.works

Skinning hookers in their basements, plotting the violent takeover of the government, woodworking, climbing, just the usual boy stuff, you know?

Jokes aside, "things that a large percentage of the population looks at and says, hey, that is a cool hobby". How is that for a definition?

5

Woodworking is a fun thing to do and a great conversation starter but also commonly done at home or at a shared work area that is all male

Rock climbing and plotting the violent takeover of the government has worked well for me however

0

Many women want a guy who is pro choice, can cook, is able to hold a conversation that’s not about sex, is capable of having platonic female friends, has hobbies, and has decent hygiene.

As someone who is literally all of these, it's still a nightmare to find a romantic partner. Personallt, I've given up on going out of my way to find someone, because every time I put myself out there I either get ignored or ghosted

9

Damn, the platonic female friends part really got me. Reality is sad.

1
lemmy.world

If it's misandrist to tell the Trump voters who modeled their personalities on empty victory declaration and hurting brown people, then I'm a proud misandrist. Men who suck don't deserve to get laid. No one deserves sex.

-42
lemmy.world

Is it possible to have a discussion without some queball trying to make it about Trump?

58
lemmy.world

a discussion about masculinity in the present political era with toxic online personalities and toxic politics and you're upset that Trump gets mentioned? That's a 'you' problem.

-34
lemmy.world

the Trump voters who modeled their personalities on empty victory declaration and hurting brown people

???

Are you assuming lonely men all fit the above description? If so, that's idiotic.

If not, then I don't know what the fuck you're on about, lol.

52
lemmy.world

I think a lot of lonely men do fit that description; studies show that political division is affecting dating. It's not that complicated.

-31
lemmy.world

Stereotyping and generalizing is uncomplicated by nature, yes. That's the whole point, after all—to prejudge so that you can 'spare' your mind the effort of considering individual situations and circumstances.

33
lemmy.world

Mass individual situations are contemplated through generalizations. I'm not interested in every snowflake.

-3

You're very much part of the problem. Reddit would be a much better fit for you.

14
sgtgigreply
sh.itjust.works

Why do you believe that lonely men must suck? Like, do you think men who would be decent partners just immediately find success and leave the dating pool, never to vent their frustration with modern dating culture?

35

Studies show that political division is affecting dating.

The political environment involves a lot of broken weak men who learned broken weak masculinity and that's affecting dating.

-26
lemmy.world

All Trump supporters who are lonely have some work to do and don't really deserve sympathy.

-23

You... do realize there are lonely men in other countries, right? Like, the US is not the only place on Earth? Ah yes, the infamous Trump voters from checks notes ... Norway, Egypt, Japan, etc.

And if you're gonna say "Well they're not voting for Trump but some other Trump-like politician", don't bother. You can't generalize every man, half the world population, just because you know men who voted Trump/Trump equivalents. Because if that'd be how it works, I could just as easily find you a woman that voted Trump and then point out how, supposedly, women suck cause they vote Trump based on this "evidence".

12
lemmy.world

Frankly my positioning on men and feminism is also received negatively on lemmy world. Everyone's all about extending compassion and sympathy to men as subjects in an attempt to control them. Someone suggested we 'redefine strength.' To me strength cannot be redefined: you can only accept that many men are lonely because of their own choices and do, in fact, need to man up.

-2

It isn't easy, you know? It's whether you get it or you don't. Being fit and reliable is hard to some people.

3

Yeah. Politicians won't get nowhere telling the population about their next NO-BLUEBALLS Act.

1

Haven't seen you in awhile Drag, wonderful to run into you. First time on my new instance! (Had to switch form Lemm.ee)

5

There something quite ableist about all of this.

As if everyone can pull themselves up by their bootstraps without the support of a community around them.

72

That isn't what people mean by it. Loneliness means loneliness.

Imagine what would happen if somebody said this about women. Are you lonely, ladies? Have you tried being enjoyable and relaxing? And you should smile more!

71

and then i learned what people meant by it (men arent getting laid)

Weird post, that literally just isn't a thing at all. This reads like a thinly veiled attempt to try to put down people they perceive as "not getting laid". This kind of "skill issue" attack rhetoric actually contributes to the male loneliness epidemic

69
lemmy.world

It's as ironic as it is frustrating that so many of the same people who'd be outraged at the notion of a woman's value being determined in any part, by whether she is a virgin, will, gleefully and without irony, consider virginity not only a valid, but a go-to insult to use against men.

Double standards are so irritating.

26
feddit.org

Also all the "progressives" who use penis size as insults. Like, are you trying to promote toxic masculinity?

20
lemmy.world

Especially frustrating when they try to justify it because it's aimed at a 'bad guy'. Doesn't change the fact that penis size is as immutable as height, and is therefore completely idiotic to use as basis for insult.

Not to mention the complete lack of empathy and consideration for all of the decent guys who have penises that are 'small' too, who are catching strays for no good reason every time that's used as an insult.

19
lemmy.dbzer0.com

...height, and is therefore completely idiotic to use as basis for insult.

Boy do I have some bad news for you, "manlet" is also perfectly valid in their eyes.

6

It's not news to me, my choice of height for the analogy versus something like eye color, which also would have worked, was deliberate.

I'm extremely wary of anyone who insults or compliments others or even themself, based on any immutable characteristic.

5

Yeah, right? Sex isn‘t even a huge aspect of why I‘d want a relationship anymore. It would complement it, sure, but if the relationship otherwise is just an expensive, instagram story bullshit, body insecurity fuelled mess where eating disorder meets self-worth anxiety…fuck no!

I just want someone to hug and cuddle with atp if I‘m being real. Does sharing this on lemmy make me “weak” and “un-manly” in the eyes of society? Maybe, but that‘s part of a problem I honestly don‘t care about any longer.

16

To me, it reads like they're just extrapolating the statements from the loudest group of people who tend to yell online about the male loneliness epidemic (incels that blame women for their celibacy) out and assuming that's the majority opinion, which actually tends to be more referencing actual loneliness in general. Either that, or they just worded it a little badly.

I do agree that the rhetoric can be a bit detrimental though.

14

Well this is just... Wrong. The "loneliness epidemic" doesn't just have to do with getting laid. What an absurd take.

Having sex is just a part of it, because lo and behold sex is a healthy and normal part of the human biological process.

However, ask a man what it's like trying to make friends. Or if they made any new friends as of late... Or in the past 5 years. Yes, just friends, not sexual partners.

You'll find a lot of guys past the school phase and into the work/career phase haven't made any new friends. If you're a man with a career then congrats! You probably have money. But no real time to make new friends, get back in touch with old friends, or find someone to date. If you're a man with work, but not a career, you're probably broke most of the time. Too broke to go or do anything.

Even men in relationships, having families, can suffer from loneliness. Yeah, you got a wife, abd maybe a kid... but you still need friends!

An issue with this loneliness problem is that it's not taken seriously, and dismissing it as "Oh it's just a sex thing. Git gud." is exactly that. Not difficult to see how something like the so-called "manosphere" can swoop in; religions, cults, and similar find the lost, stuck, and disenfranchised easy prey.

66

Male loneliness is about camaraderie. If it was about getting laid, then prostitution would solve it. Busting a nut isn't gonna fix a psychological problem facing the adult male population in modern western society and this shitty tumblr post isn't gonna either. Its down right perpetuating it. Now, some truth is there; COMPANIONSHIP (not not getting laid) is a wonderful thing and does help, but the root of the problem is societal.

55
slrpnk.net

Wait, what? I thought it was about camaraderie as well. I mean, yeah, I wish I was getting laid but I’d honestly rather have a community of people around me who provide mutual support to each other.

54
lemmy.world

Yeah, I don't know what the tumblr user in the screenshot is talking about. That's just not what people mean when they talk about the male loneliness epidemic. Seems like they just want to put others down while dishing out useless, hollow advice ..."be enjoyable"... lmao wow they solved it, great thanks.

53

Turns out "leftist" take-generators are not immune to making up bullshit to mock & deride for social clout

18
medgremlinreply
midwest.social

If it's a conversation about 3rd spaces and a lack of opportunities for IRL social interaction in modern society, I think it's more apt and more productive to just call it a loneliness epidemic. People who are not cis-men have the same problems of not being able to access affordable, pleasant places to socialize in their communities. Calling it the "male" loneliness epidemic just leads to animosity and division where there should be solidarity.

4

I mean, the specifically-male loneliness epidemic is a symptom of the patriarchy. Patriarchal societies pretty much define "male" as someone who can't talk about their feelings. Which is, again, pretty much the definition of the specifically-male loneliness epidemic.
Males are hardly allowed to talk about their struggles, so they frequently struggle with mental health problems on top of that. Feminism, a.k.a. solidarity, is the only way to solve this.

5

It's not just about getting laid, but there are of course incels that make it all about that.

13

I feel like this type of reply to the male loneliness epidemic (or y'know just the loneliness epidemic, since loneliness has been on the rise independent of gender) really does not give a shit about the people that experience loneliness by reducing them to the most horrible and loud of subset of them.

Sure, there are incels that will twist and turn every societal tragedy into why they are victims and deserve to keep hating women. But by listening to them and reducing the entire problem to hahaha, the women haters are getting what they deserve, you are just hurting everyone else.

52

I...simply don't know what to make of this. I'm a guy who finds himself thinking about the male loneliness epidemic a lot, and never in terms of finding a romantic/sexual partner. It's always about solid platonic bonds outside of that and kin, and factors that make those harder to find and maintain these days.

Is this just a shitpost and I'm too stupid to get the joke?

48
sh.itjust.works

It's the "works on my machine" of social interaction. I have never received a less useful piece of information.

26

It's way more than a sex issue. Getting laid is easy, if you only care about getting your dick wet. Making and keeping friends, especially meaningful friendships, is getting harder and harder. Anyone who reduces it down to "lol who cares about incels not getting laid" is being bad faith dismissive about a massive problem.

42

Haha! Hey, look! Men expressing feelings in comments and getting attacked by alphas and women for doing so! Next post on askmen - "Why are men so closed in and do not share their feelings?"

Maybe some are making it about getting laid, but overwhelmingly most men struggling with it have completely different reasons for why it is happening, in many cases outside of their power.

42
piefed.ca

I'm lonely because my male friends turned into incredible assholes during the pandemic, became predatory creeps and started sharing videos of Andrew Tate. So I dumped them.

I miss 'hanging out with the boys' nights eating wings with beer while estiver l watching sports, or having barbecues, or playing board games or video games.

I have a LOT of lady friends now, though. But it's not the same.

40
Crisreply
lemmy.world

🫂

That sucks man. Its never an easy thing to lose a friend, nevermind a whole bunch of them.

18
piefed.ca

Man... the dude was my friend since my early teens. We were like brothers. We drifted a bit apart after he moved in the suburbs and had a family. It was hard to hang out with work and everything. He was like the central hub of a group of friends from those early teens.

We had a group chat and new people joined in. Friends of theirs. During the pandemic some became vehemently anti-mask, or anti-vax. It was extremely difficult and awkward when we got back together coming out of the pandemic when it was still a hot topic. One of the guys is a far-right religious type and started pushing Fox News and Andrew Tate clips in the chat and the others either became outraged (in the wrong way, like in agreement with Fox News) or started agreeing with Tate.

Then my best bud became vehemently LGBTQ-phobic. Like it became a conspiracy where they were trying to indoctrinate his kids, 2 girls. Became outraged at trans people and anything related to that.

I tried to talk some sense into them, but it was really not working. They very quickly got deeper into this shit through YouTube videos and their fucking algorithms that keeps pushing more far-right content than anything else. Then it went out of control.

When the other far-right guy posted a Fox News clip about the female olympic boxer who could be disqualified because she was failing a test for testosterone or something, Fox saying she was a trans woman, my friend lost his shit. I didn't have any more energy to talk any sense in him so I just quit the group chat and never spoke to him or the group again.

I spent some awesome times with those guys and have fond memories of hanging out with them. Sharing DragonBalls mangas, playing GoldenEye 007 on the N64 and later playing Halo on the X-Box together. Watching stupid b-movies and awesome anime. Going out to sports bars together. Playing basketball. Etc.

I feel so lonely right now. I don't have any friends like them any more and it's really weighing down on my depression. I only have the one friend from high school left who's normal, but he's flaky and often cancels on our plans or is always 1h late to dinners and events. He also never calls me. I'm always the one calling him. He's not doing too well either so maybe that's why.

Anyway. Thank you for reading through this if you did.

18

This is really sad.

I want to believe your former friends could be de-eadicalized, but man, i would not envy anybody actively trying to do so.

4

I have had a similar experience with a group of friends from college. They have been slowly getting worse, if not quite as bad as your group. I haven't completely cut them off, but I rarely hang out with them in person, and ignore the group chat most of the time.

I had another group of friends from rock climbing, that slowly moved away to colorado. I still talk to them online and play video games with them occasionally, but I miss the literal IRL hangs.

I'm also fortunate to have other friends from college who I have more politically in common with, we have another group chat where we talk shit about and commiserate about the other group and the general state of the world. We've also been trying to get together IRL more.

3

Thats gut-wrenching man, I'm so sorry, that's a horrifying loss

I have a sleep disorder that often leaves me very isolated in spite of my connections- feeling disconnected from anyone around you is brutal, it does rough things to your head

It doesn't help that making friends as an adult is incredibly hard. Most of my friends came from going to events in my local kink community and that has helped, but I've been trying to brainstorm more ways to feel connected to community when my sleep allows. The universalist unitarian churches seem interesting, they're essentially secular (I'm very much an atheist) and are very progressive. It might be kinda nice to pick up a hobby like martial arts or rock climbing but those cost money and I am very broke right for the time being 😅

I hope that in the not too distant future more good folks find their way into your life, isolation can take a very heavy toll 🫂

2

I think it is funny how you post this, then in the comments deny that this is the type of opinion someone like you, a proud leftist feminist have, and that it is actually most men who think like this.

depends on your circles. in feminist and leftist circles, it usually means the first but most men outside of those circles use it just to mean “im not getting the dates i am ENTITLED to 😡"

If that is the case, why did you make this post? What was the purpose of your post if this isn't how you think about lonely men? What did you want to achieve with it? I can tell you, that you're not going achieve anything positive.

I assume you'd like to be treated with respect and compassion yourself since you have that blåhaj attached to you. That respect and compassion is a two way street.

The fact that SOME men feel entitled to women doesn't mean that most men think or feel like that. The loneliness many men (and women for that matter) feel is very real and it is a far bigger and more complex issues than just "lawl, can't get laid".

I personally know what it is like to be mistreated by very bad men. It left deep scars on me that I have to carry for life. However, I promised myself that I would not become a man hater back when I was going through my trauma. I refused to let a couple of asshole determine how I would meet the world and the men in it. It would be unfair to those who had never done a thing to me and it would be unfair to myself because I was better than that.

You too are better than this and you either have to start treat all people with respect and compassion if you want the same in return or you need to own that it is in fact not "most men" who think like this, it is you who think like this. Stand by your convictions and own them or change course because you know that what you're putting out into the world right now is ugly and reductive.

39

No, it's actually the first but being shoved aside and ignored as the second.

38

I didn't ask to have BPD. I didn't ask for inability to regulate emotions. I can only be me. I definitely cannot pretend to be relaxed or fun. That's not just me. Relaxed side of me comes out slowly.

I am not asking for every woman to date me or even go out with me. All I am asking for is a bit of empathy. But if that's too much, well. I cannot change anyone's mind.

p.s., I wish I were not born. But, that is out of my hands too.

36
aussie.zone

This is gonna sound crazy but I've had some incredibly lonely sex where I haven't felt connected, intimate or seen by my partner.

34
discuss.online

omg welcome to being gay, yeah you can have sex instantly 24/7 but it's absolutely soulless and soul destroying in a lot of cases. Intimacy is what people what but can't figure out how to have. That's true in every form of relationship.

18

you can have sex instantly 24/7

Fuck me. Conservatives told me gay was a choice. And here I picked the wrong team.

13

omg welcome to being gay, yeah you can have sex instantly 24/7

Either you're male, things have changed a LOT since I found a steady partner, or I'm really bad at this.

3

I don't think that sounds crazy at all. I wish that this sentiment were discussed more freely in society, because I hate the stereotype that men only care about pure physicality in sex (and the corresponding stereotype that women only care about emotional connection).

10

Same, it was like a one night stand but with someone I had known and slept with before. I call it the n+1 night stand.

6

What? That's perfectly normal. First two times I had sex I was like, "THIS is what all the hoopla was about?!" Gf and I met at 17 and fucked like rabid wolverines. She had had the same experience! Two guys before me, meh.

Felt that way with my ex-wife. Woke one day, realized I was lonely as hell, with a wife and two kids! Thank god she left. Took the kids, had to fight like hell to get 'em back, but thank god she's gone. Proceeded to have many fine lovers over the next few years, landed my wife, could not be happier.

5

I think it’s good to discuss our feelings. Men have socially reinforced the exact opposite amongst themselves and had it imposed on them by others. We’ve all heard “boys don’t cry, man up” etc. I worked with a young man who thought he was mad all the time. We broke through that, he was having so many emotions he didn’t know how to label because he simply wasn’t encouraged in that direction. That, I think, is incredibly lonely.

Stack on top of that growing up behind a computer screen, surrounded by manfluencers giving questionable advice, having your formative years recorded and picked apart…not being able to make those early awkward social interactions because of covid for a lot of young men as well…yeah.

Of course I think it does get conflated with a lack of intercourse or whatever. Young women are feeling abused by their lack of rights and they view what would traditionally be awkward young love/courtship as a threat. Incel ideology used to be fridge, but there are a disturbing number of young men embracing these ideas. All while women’s reproductive options are limited, making intimacy more difficult for everyone.

So there’s this historical precedent of not opening up, but boys started to learn not to do that anymore. Just in time to get shut down. It’s not girls fault, it’s not boys fault, it sucks. But I don’t see it improving until intimacy feels safe for everyone again.

33

I love posts that explicitly state that my loneliness is entirely my fault, and not an unprecedented societal issue affecting more people than ever before

try less hard to get laid and try more hard to be an enjoyable and relaxing presence

Been doing that for 30 years. Is there another step?

32

I don't think it's just about sex. I'm not even sure incels think that. I think it's more about relationships and someone to share your life with. I know some people seem fine with just friends and casual sex, but I think a lot of people have a need, or strong "want," for a close, deep, intimate relationship. I know I do at least. Even if it was just about sex, sex is pretty much a human need.

Personally, I have severe life-long social anxiety (and depression), so it's always been very hard for me to make friends or meet potential partners. I have worked on my anxiety issue (medication, attempts at self help, though I could never afford therapy), and I am better than before (I used to sometimes get panic attacks just being around large groups of people), but it's still severe enough to hinder me in life in general (and noticeable to people around me).

31

Genuinely, who keeps posting shit like this on here? I keep seeing posts such as this one and it's honestly pushing me away from Lemmy. Why spend time on a platform that hates me? If being a man who didn't date (because of social anxiety, btw, not that you'd care, since clearly men are by default fascists, according to some comments here) is a sin, let us know on the front page, so that me and others like myself can avoid this place.

A lot of comments are, thankfully, calling this shitty behaviour out. But then I look at the post itself, which has 696 upvotes and 166 downvotes, and I'm like... I'm not wanted here.

31

Semi related but it's actually so irritating how I have to go through life where my value as a human being is decided by how much money I make, how many girls I get, how successful I am when I could not care less about any of that, but I will get judged severely for it if anyone "finds out" that I'm not successful in... things I don't care about...

Like why is that my value to people? I don't want to have kids with you, you don't have to live my life, if it's fun and rewarding being around me why is that not enough? It seeps in even to progressive speech where people will say "clearly he gets no women" like that decides their value as a person. Very cringe. Also don't forget to downvote for minimizing male loneliness as men can't get women for the 9999th time.

29

I am in a relationship, but also lonely. I would like someone to share relationship-problems with for when they occur every once in a while. But it's hard.

Don't believe all the crap you see on TikTok and talk to actual people about their problems. Please.

28
lemmy.world

Unfortunately, in addition to being discouraged from camaraderie and bonding, many boys and young men are also discouraged from ever developing the emotional security needed to see, or outwardly acknowledge that they are lonely and suffering from their lack of connections to others beyond sex.

They are instead taught that any form of vulnerability (like acknowledging their unmet need for connection) is weakness they should be ashamed of because it's unbecoming of a man

We really do men and boys a huge disservice :(. Sometimes you hear the idea that we should "teach men not to rape, rather than teach women to protect themselves", but I've never heard anyone talk about how in practice what that would look like, is raising emotionally healthy and secure, interpersonally competent boys, who are equipped to handle difficult emotional situations and the hormones that will show up as teenagers.

28
lemmy.world

Not everything comes down to how men are taught. These men made bad decisions for their cultural and interpersonal growth, and until they stop making those bad decisions, they're unfuckable, and that's good.

-15
Crisreply
lemmy.world

There being causes for someone's cruelty doesn't change their responsibility for it, but understanding those causes is vital if you wish to do anything about the fact that it is a persistent societal issue.

I don't think ill socialized, emotionally unwell, harmful people should be fuckable, I think that we need to recognize that they are ill socialized, and emotionally unwell, if we'd like there to be fewer harmful people in the future.

7

I don't have any problem recognizing that, my solution is to tell them they made bad decisions and need to man up.

-1

no, make loneliness epidemic is exactly what's described in the first post. societal norms mostly hinder men from forming meaningful friendships with other men, and women as well. they're discouraged from expressing feelings (maybe other than aggressive ones) and being vulnerable. i don't know how you can form any relationships without doing either. and turns out you really can't. hence a lot of men feel lonely.

27

OK, but...no? That's not what people are talking about with the male loneliness epidemic. They're talking about how an inability to connect with their peers on a more than superficial level, coupled with a lack of older male role models, are causing Gen Z and Millennial men to report extremely high levels of loneliness.

It's tangentially related to, "getting laid," as many of these men are driven towards misogynistic monosphere influencers who make sexual conquest a measure of self-worth, but that's a symptom of the problem, not the totality of it. Also, some people debate the existence of the loneliness epidemic altogether, but no one defines it as, "men aren't getting laid."

25

to all the men out there not getting laid: try less hard to get laid and try more hard to be an enjoyable and relaxing presence

As someone who spent a full seven years as a horny teenager, I'm afraid to report this is much more difficult than it sounds on paper.

But I'll spot you something that can help a lot

close camaraderie and bonding between men

Honestly, the most success I've had with women was when I was surrounded by male friends who left me feeling relaxed and confident.

24

Anecdotal, but I struggle with connecting with people in person. I try to do the 'be yourself' thing, the 'talk about what you like' malarkey, all that stuff. I have watched eyes glaze over and interest recede in real time simply because I answered, truthfully and wholly, the question of "what do you like to do?" To boil it down to two words that don't cover any specifics or explore any deeper aspects: experimental music. There are others, but that's the biggest hat I choose to wear.

So I've instead closed in on myself when I'm in public, especially at work. Don't speak unless spoken to, keep to myself, and just keep hands on the keyboard and eyes on the screen. And then I go home, to try to reach out to any of the local friends I do have - friends that love me and have told me, directly, often, that I'm a comforting and relaxing presence in their often chaotic and confusing lives - to try to gain a moment of in-person, face-to-face contact. Too busy, too far, they need space to take care of themselves. The last thing I, or anyone, wants is for me to be needy. I do not, and have never, faulted anyone for how they navigate their own slice of the shit pile called life they have to deal with.

But I'm living alone for the first time in my life through no choice of my own. Connecting to new people, whether it is just for friendship, or, even more unlikely, romantic endeavors, more often than not feels like talking to a brick. Not even a wall made of bricks - a singular, boring, uninspiring brick. They have no interest in what I am or am about, and I struggle to find any kind of connection to what they have to say.

So, I stay lonely. I know I'm the problem, but I don't want anyone else to help me deal with it.

23

I have a wife and I don't feel lonely.

But I noticed my third place "go to" places are very lonely and they were a place I use to be to socialise randomly.

Backthen: Going to the gym was an adventure, blast some weights and grab a cappucino with someone on the way out and talk about the routine, how they are progressing etc... PEOPLE TALKED.

Now? Everyone on the phones during sets, if they aren't doing that they run around with headphones and walk and use the phone,..

It's everywhere. I am not different now.

But trust me guys and ladies, it's not having no partner. It's the phones, it's the phones. If they'd shutdown the internet people won't be dating anymore and the human race would just end cause people can't communicate in person anymore.

23

is it ok if i don't judge my sense of manhood by the "getting laid" part ?

i'm not into judging womanhood by using male anything, and i don't see why the other way makes any more sense.

16

People who make getting laid or not their whole personality are people that I would want nothing to do with.

15

I'm with the second guy. I'm not going to doom scroll through useless dating apps and talking to every woman on the street. I'd rather do my own hobbies and do my own things so worst case scenario, I'm happy with what I'm doing, best case scenario I get a SO, or reasonable scenario is I make some friends.

15

Funny. I always thought it was a camaraderie thing because I'm married. That definitely makes a lot of sense though because young men are becoming more right-wing and most women do not like that so it seems like that would be a big hurdle and maybe they just need to figure their shit out.

13
sh.itjust.works

The fact that men are turning to Far Right Grifters is tragic. They're not doing it because they're horrible people, they're doing it because they're being left behind by everyone and only noticed by the Joe Rogans of the world.

If we had a guy on the Left who looked at men and say "I don't know who you are, or what's going on, but you my friend are enough and it's not your fault you're struggling.", we wouldn't have Man-O-Sphere bullshit

Instead we blame men for all of the world's problems, and double down when they side with the only people who aren't calling them incels. People who ironically, are actively turning them into

"They treated me like an animal, so that's what I became." seems to be the mindset between those brainwashed by the Man-O-Sphere

Part of my reason for thinking this is I'm trans and when I presented as a guy, I got treated like shit, nearly got kicked out of college over a bullshit claim (That was thankfully proven bullshit, which is why I said nearly got kicked out) that I stalked a female classmate. But once I grew tits, suddenly everyone was quick to tell me how much I mattered and that it "gets better", people complimented me, people held doors open for me.... Sure I probably make less than my male coworkers, but at least I feel like I matter.

When you're a man, you're assumed guilty because the world sees things through a Pink and Blue lens, anyone Pink is a victim, anyone Blue is an abuser.

And quite frankly, it's not healthy for anyone.

21

Trans masc friends tell me that one of the things they miss most about presenting as women is drunk girl solidarity in nightclub bathrooms. Until I was a part of that conversation, I didn't realise how much I cherish these moments. Hearing this helped me to understand the loneliness of being a man far more than I did before.

I think that there are men on the left who leverage their platforms to reach out to men as you describe, but the problem is that their reach is far more limited because compassion doesn't sell as effectively as outrage bait; Manosphere content is incredibly skilled at creating a vicious cycle in which they incite anger in viewers, and, having nowhere to channel this anger effectively, it threatens to turn to despair, leading emotionally vulnerable viewers to return to the Manosphere, to "re-up" their rage. In the short term, it seems to offer some catharsis, but it fosters an odd dependence. The compassionate men on the left are more likely to resist this kind of dependence cycle (such as through taking steps to avoid unhealthy parasocial relationships with viewers, even if said relationships would make sponsorships more lucrative.

12
lemmy.world

When the vast majority of everyone (other than said grifters et al) offers boys nothing but contempt and prejudice, they make them easy pickings for the only people offering them something else, even if they're lying.

It's similar to the reason that a guy who never gets attention from women is likely to 'fall in love' and immediately develop a strong infatuation for the first woman to pay attention to him.

14
sh.itjust.works

This, men are attracted by the Man-O-Sphere because everyone else says they don't matter.

God I'd love it if there was a Joe Rogan of the Left.

9
ThorrJoreply
lemmy.sdf.org

Critically, however, the "Joe Rogan of the left" will never, can never, and must never be engineered and groomed by the absolute unmitigated fucking cryptkeeper scumbags running the Democrat party.

3

Joe didn't used to be an alt right scum bag. But then his left leaning guests boycotted him for having right leaning guests. Leading to a situation where he only had right leaning guests....

It was a mistake for Kamala to turn down the Rogan interview

4

Male loneliness is real and multifactorial, but yeah its also self fulfilling. Rather than examine difficult societal reasons and address them, we fall back on tired masculine tropes and try to blame women for not being accomodating or whatever.

11

I'm trying really hard to not reduce the issue to "women won't have sex with me" but the responses are flooded with this general sentiment.

I think some guys suffer from mental illness and don't have support from the people around them and things like male privilege can diminish their perceived suffering. Even so, I rarely see men actually talk about it.

Like, only on places like 4chan people are brave enough to spew whatever shit's on their mind and I'll tell you that while they can be the minority in a lot of regards, there is something sincere in their unfiltered, crude language that really helps me understand it a little. A lot of it does feel like whinning about sexlessness, but sometimes they make a point and actually talk about their suffering.

It seems like men are desperate for sex and, in pursuit, find grifters who peddle them conservatism. These are the type of people that come to my mind when we talk about it.

9

Ok, ok, ok. I know everyone likes anecdotes.

I don't fall in the lonely camp, but I'm definitely not getting laid.

Why am I not getting laid?

Well I used to think it was cause I was fat, but then I lost a ton of weight. Then I thought it was cause I wasn't fit so I put on muscle. Then I thought it was cause I was vampire pale so I got sunburned.

Reality is:

  1. I annoy myself in my own head. I'm definitely going to annoy a potential sex partner.
  2. I am literally scared of everything. Fear does not encourage one to partake in mating rituals.
  3. I have priorities like a job and a son that are more important than a new woman in my life will be for a while.
  4. Having a big dick doesn't give you big dick energy.
8

“A gentleman is someone who makes everyone around him feel as comfortable as possible” - Brendan Fraser in “Blast from the Past”

5
ttrpg.network

I feel like, as an average white ~40 year old guy in a major city, getting dates and sex wasn't that hard. But from what I've heard, the bar is extremely low. Like, all the woman I talk to (and the men who date men) have horror stories.

I think my worst dates were like... they mildly insulted me.

Neither of those come close to, like, various threats, violence, boundary breaking, and unsolicited dick picks that seem too common.

4
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I've had three women cheat on me, one threaten to shoot me, one tell me "no you don't understand, this is going to happen" when I attempted to refuse sex (which would be called rape if the genders were swapped but legally women can't rape in my area so it was "just" sexual assault), one cry and threaten suicide if I ever wasn't in the mood, and one that stalked me for months.

I'm glad you're having a good time, but women aren't God's Perfect Little Creatures, they also do bad shit too.

5
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Workin' on it lol.

Though, would you tell that to women who has had bad experiences with men? Food for thought.

3
lemmy.world

Yeah, I’ve told multiple women that very thing, I’ve got a friend who I’ve said that to like a million times.

1

This is a pretty stupid take. Just stupid. Not much to add to this.

Much of my energy is spent trying to be an enjoyable presence and it god damn works as people seek my presence. Does this lead to sex? No, why would it?

Being an enjoyable presence in order to get sex makes absolutely no sense.

4

I think this is one of those "All advice is bad advice, if you are behaving like a dumbass" situations.

6

Meanwhile I find I get unwanted attention from women, at a work event they kept talking to me. For some reason pretending to be interested in my clearly boring story. Why won't she leave me alone? I just want to eat the free food and go home.

I even talked about Linux and that didn't drive her away.

3

I got the opposite problem. I'm tall and fairly well built, so I have plenty of luck on the apps. But since I moved states, I can't be fucked to find a friend. Literally just tried to arrange a "play date" and got cancelled on the moment I was about to knock on their door.

Maybe I'm just not likeable?

2

and then i learned what people meant by it (men arent getting laid) to which i say skill issue

Is that what it actually refer to ? Then I too, misunderstood.

2
lemmy.ca

I had a long, protracted discussion with someone before leaving reddit in which he was certain toxic masculinity was feminists’ fault.

Women expect too much of men, will only accept buff and young guys, over 6’ tall, etc.

My ex of 30 years was like 5’10 and had a very agreeable dad bod. You know what actually matters – and what always mattered to all my girl fiends? The guys who cared enough to learn what we cared about, and who did all the little things. Never looks, never spending 5 hours in the gym. Spending 5 hours making a 2 year old happy is the sexiest thing there is.

But yeah, women make men toxic. 🙄

1

?

Where did I say that?

I said that the ‘alpha male’ culture is toxic and wrong, in my opinion.

Why did you take my comment as an attack? That’s kind of weird, tbh.

0

I don't want to come across as a mysogynist or a misanthrope but this "It's your fault that you're lonely because you're a trash human that nobody wants to sleep with" infuriates me, because I get that shit enough from my own head without it coming from outside as well.

I don't want to just sleep with someone, I want to be able to comfortably enjoy my time with people I like and then maybe meet someone likeminded enough to build a relationship with.

I have a few friends, and spend time with them whenever I can, but 99% of my time is spent working or at home recovering from work.

I know there's the whole "You have to get out there and socialise." and "Get a hobby and you'll meet new people." But how does a single man even approach people without coming across as weird or creepy?

For obvious reasons I should probably clarify that I'm aware my brain doesn't work like regular people's do, and am probably doing the same shit as the old "people online; 'Having throw pillows makes you part of the bourgeoisie' / People irl; 'Hey man how's it going?' " tweet, but god damn if it isn't hard to have the confidence to meet people irl when all you see is things like the 'bear in a forest' trope and news stories about violent abusers reinforcing negative self bias.

Who knows. Maybe I just need to throw my nightmare rectangle off a cliff and buy a phone that only does 4 things, text, call, tell the time and play snake.

1

If anybody here wants to make friends but not get laid, I invite you to my discord channel. We're planning to make the leap to a different platform soon, but no idea when.

0

TIL: Male Loneliness Epidemic isn't Loneliness, is Laidlessness

Edit: MLE = Incel???

-1
lemmy.world

But if they stop trying to get laid: they also wont get laid because they'll... not go out and socialize. They'll probably stay home in their comfortable bubble, play video games, watch youtube or anime or whatever, eat junk food, and jork it. Fall back into a comfy ritual. Catch 22.

And then they'll look at social media, experience FOMO when it seems like everyone else is fucking or in a happy relationship, get stars in their eyes thinking maybe there is a chance to not be forever alone. Go out and try again and fall flat on their face socially again as they desperately and obviously try to get laid and reek of social ineptitude. And the self loathing is reinforced another notch towards suicidality/blackpilling.

Or they avoid flaring up that sense of loneliness and horniness by just shutting off from socializing (online or offline) entirely. Can't experience fomo if you try to forget other people exist. But then of course they'll get cabin fever and start hallucinating the hat man.

Crackpot theory of my own: I also think some of these men, considering how much they complain about how hard it is being men, are not particularly attached to being men at all. If it were convenient and safe and they could ensure they were hot/decent looking at the end of it they'd probably transition into being a girl to just not be lonely anymore. Basically, they're "conditional eggs" or at least agender. If it becomes medically trivial to become a hot girl that's what a lot of them would transition to. There was a thing within the incel crowd called "trans-maxxing". While obviously transitioning with current technology and social acceptance probably wont make their lives easier (despite the transmaxxing manifesto claiming it would) there might be a point in the future where it would. Medical technology is advancing at a pretty crazy rate.

I do wonder what the social gender-divide fabric in that case would look like. What if say, a significant portion of existing men gave up on being men (but where not dysphoric trans, just desperate incels willing to throw away their identity for any intimacy through advanced medical transition). Most transwomen end up being straight once they transition. Either because they were always attracted to men on some level or because there is a significant chance HRT induces a change in who they're attracted to. If the medical transition technology was advanced enough, it'd probably be possible to increase that probability by demand. This would shift the ratio of hetero women available vs hetero men available. Lower pressure to compete as men since you can just "join the other team" and there would intrinsically be more straight women available vs straight men.

Of course, this would likely upset traditionalists and conservatives. And it'd make TERFs feel vindicated "See! Men just want to possess women's bodies for sex!" or something.

Brain computer interface haptics + VR/AR or Robot Waifus are probably more likely arrive before trivial "hot girl" transition is possible though and probably more likely to attract more forever-alones & incels than transition. Still a fun thought experiment IMO.

-2
fodorreply
lemmy.zip

Your rant got it wrong in the first paragraph. People can socialize with or without hitting on others. Ah well, better luck next time!

4

My autistic rant started out longer and with more context. I cut it down and perhaps too aggressively. I was mainly talking about guys who specifically are less inclined to socialize than to stay home. Which is clearly a lot of people in general, not just hetero-guys.

That is, some hetero men generally only go out with a specific goal or reason to go out and socialize outside of socializing itself because they don't find that on its own naturally a good enough reason, other than maintaining basic sanity/avoiding cabin fever.

Generally speaking hetero women have different requirements that don't necessitate consistent socialization or even social skills so if they're naturally a home-body and barely get out this probably wont be an issue for them dating-wise. If a woman is having issues dating, the advice given is almost never "you need to touch grass more".

My own context: These days I do enjoy socializing for its own sake. Maybe a little too much considering how expensive it can be... However, I am an autistic guy and I used to think I was straight. I generally spent most of my early adult life staying home playing video games, working, and not otherwise socializing at all for like 5 years of my life like some kind of hermit. Thinking for that things would just work out magically for some reason in terms of romantic relationships for me. So I kind of have some understanding of this particular mentality. I only really got into socializing and "touching grass" originally to find a woman. If I had not had that goal originally I probably would have stayed predominately a loner. Its fortunate that I ended up enjoying being a socialite for its own sake anyway, but not every guy does.

-1

The internet gives everyone mental health issues, especially adolescents and especially women.

It does so largely because it distracts away our attention from our natural environment, and also because the internet is largely very toxic, if one considers social media platforms like Instagram and Xitter. Both of these effects lead to a surge in anxiety, depression and related diseases.

It is no wonder then, that these adolescents and young adults don't want to engage in relationships anymore. That leads to a loss of self-esteem (because being attractive to others is a large source of self-esteem), which troubles the mental health condition even more.

The best way forward would be if large parts of the society ditch social media altogether. Xitter is becoming a propaganda instrument more and more, day by day, and there's simply no use exposing a large part of the society, which has no critical thinking skills, to the non-stop mind-manipulating brainwashing machine that large parts of the internet nowadays are.

-3

Be an actual person. Have empathy. Have sympathy. Stop listening to Rogan, Peterson, stop doing Wim Hof baths, stop taking T when you don't need it - focus on life, see nature, see the destruction of climate change, stop wanting to "get yours" and enjoy money and material goods in this life without caring about what impact these choices have to those who follow. Talk to women as peers and not sex objects. Join groups where the focus is not sex or angry fight club bullshit and meet people and get to know them slowly. Go to third spaces like coffee shops or local events - get out of your room and step away from the keyboard. This has become very hard for people. And FFS delete TikTok and Reddit.

So many people have become introverted and focus on hate and allow their homes, apartments, and lives to wither in benign neglect as they go deeper down the redpill rabbit hole. See someone. Go to therapy. Get the medications you need not the ones you want (T, stims, PEDs) - exception being if you actually have ADHD then stims might be appropriate but many men who want these meds do not have low T they do not have ADHD they have profound mood disorders and depression.

-9