Spyke

I know it's not deliberate, but phrases like 'spineless pussies' are why women don't feel welcome on lemmy.

Is lemmy truly a left-leaning platform? Or is it yet another tech-bro circlejerk that cares more about the aesthetics of inclusivity? You all can't have your cake and it eat it too.

-1
sh.itjust.works

https://www.openstreetmap.org

https://f-droid.org/packages/app.organicmaps/ or https://github.com/organicmaps/organicmaps

Organic Maps is a free Android & iOS offline maps app for travelers, tourists, hikers, and cyclists. It uses crowd-sourced OpenStreetMap data and is developed with love by the community. No ads, no tracking, no data collection, no crapware. 

https://f-droid.org/packages/net.osmand.plus/ or https://github.com/osmandapp/Osmand

This project aims at providing comfortable map viewing and navigation (routing) application for mobile devices. Particular stress lies with complete offline features (via pre-loaded offline map data) or economic internet usage.

https://apt.izzysoft.de/fdroid/index/apk/akylas.alpi.maps or https://github.com/Akylas/alpimaps

Alpi Maps is a map application to help you prepare and enjoy your hike! Get all the info you need before you go, then enjoy all the data offline during your hike.
174
wiareply
lemmy.ca

What you use for email?

5
hashreply
slrpnk.net

Hijacking this to plug contributing to OSM. Improving your local area is very rewarding and can pair well with some youtube binging. Take a look at your city and see if there are things you're interested in working on.

27
feddit.nl

Except when it is frustrating and continually tries to send you through tiny "technically paved" service roads so you know anyone unfamiliar to the area would risk car damage because there is no way to mark a road as "low priority" or "only use if you live on that road".

Street complete is very awesome though! Especially for updating local businesses.

6
wiareply
lemmy.ca

Does Google maps allow that? Does any map program?

3

BRouter and other routing engines can use attributes like surface and smoothness (and probably width) to calculate routes.

1

That's especially fun for those of us on motorcycles. I found a particularly horrible road to ride a sport touring bike on several years ago and would have loved this feature on osm.

1
goldfndrreply
lemmy.ml

Are you referring to smoothness=bad or a narrow width? (I'm guessing you've been using StreetComplete to specify each.)

1
feddit.nl

Holy shit, I never found smoothness in the OSM editor. Does that actually effect routing priority?

That might be a game changer for making my local area much better on OSM.

1

I'm not sure which editor you refer to as "the OSM editor", but surely id has it, JOSM can specify it, and StreetComplete has numerous quests that are disabled by default for various reasons but can be enabled (with SCEE having even more).

As for routing priority, that depends on the routing profile used by the router; there are dozens of routing profiles among several routing providers, many of which probably don't use smoothness but could. OsmAnd can — it targets some smoothness values like unpaved.

1
ickreply
infosec.pub

I am using Magic Earth for navigation. Any recommended companion iOS apps for contributing to OSM?

1

Possibly not "companion" per se, but Every Door is available for iOS and MapComplete can run in browser. Go Map!! can provide more detailed editing.

1
happydoorsreply
lemm.ee

I love the app MagicEarth for turn by turn navigation GPS. It uses OSM!

14

For anyone wondering "where do they get their money?"

It's from businesses who buy their SDK. They (allegedly) don't sell any of your data

Magic Earth is free for all our end-users but we also have a paid Magic Earth SDK for business partners. For instance Selectric.de (a supplier for navigation solutions for ambulances and fire trucks), Smarter AI (developing ADAS systems) or Absolute Cycling (using the platform on bicycles). For more info on the SDK, you can check magiclane.com.

Bottom of their faq

I haven't been able to test it out yet, but it seems pretty decent

2

Magic Earth is proprietary, though. You can believe their privacy policy, but I have trouble believing any privacy policy if I can't see the source code.

3

Actually I think this is a pretty common thing. I know several people who use iPhones and other Apple products specifically to avoid the google alternatives.

3

OpenStreetMap also needs to deal with this kind of thing. In this case, several people already tried to add it to the map in some form of other, but generally not as something to actually be shown. There is a looong discussion about it here https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 . General opinion is that it is (or will be) "the official name that the US says it has". In OSM you can invent tags for anything, so an object can have many names. Done like this, anyone using the data can still choose to give precedence to any "official US names that are not in common use yet". Later it may be upgraded ased on if it becomes a common alternative name, just in the US, or maybe beyond. All those options can have their own special tag. And only very motivated data users will ever show it to map users. But if you do a search for Gulf of America, you will be able to find it.

3
ctkatzreply
lemmy.ml

is there anything android auto compatible?

1

i never use android auto so my help would be based on what i've read.

i tried magicEarth after the above comment. It's not foss but it seems more practical for driving and it is said to be a. auto compatible.

1
miskreply
sopuli.xyz

Why? Google does this everywhere because naming is completely arbitrary and it makes sense to be up to date with current nomenclature. Poland changed name of Kaliningrad (Russian exclave that we border) to Królewiec (what it was called when it was part of Poland) in a similar manner to troll Russians and Google updated our maps as well. Apple didn’t in either case so you have options.

-9
lemmy.world

Weird, google maps still shows it as Kaliningrad, along with the Cyrillic spelling.

8
miskreply
sopuli.xyz

It’s local, same as Gulf of America which is still Gulf of Mexico for me because that’s the official name here.

8
miskreply
sopuli.xyz

They get away with it because we never bothered to learn those moon runes.

4
lemmy.world

iirc it was not just to troll rusians, it was because it was found kalinin was a murderous psycho killing a lot of poles for the red army.

3
Etterrareply
discuss.online

Two reasons. Firstly, it's the principle of the thing - fuck Google for sucking up to Orange Shitler. Secondly, because somebody, somewhere in Google gets to deal with the endless reporting - even if all that reaction is is to have to write a script to auto-ignore that exact thing because it keeps popping up and there's nothing they can do to stop it.

2

Why would Google make an exception to their global policy? Is it because America is special?

1

Following whatever is the official version of country names and even country borders based on user location has been the thing for many years now. Google probably doesn’t care and doesn’t make the exception for the US.

1
fedia.io

Pathetic. Hopefully the rest of the world doesn't follow suit. Renaming it just for one of Trump's ego trips is not a good reason.

121
PanArabreply
lemm.ee

The rest of the world obviously will not follow suit, but foreign companies selling maps in the US will have to comply, so it is just another exception that need to be handled. Naming and boundary disputes between countries have existed for years, and map makers just make enough versions to satisfy every country.

16
fedia.io

Actually, I'm unclear on that point - do foreign companies actually have to comply, or is it just limited to government communications and government-published maps (e.g. the USGS, etc.)?

13
PanArabreply
lemm.ee

Only if the maps will be accessed from the US or sold in the US, and only for the US. This is my understanding of it anyways, the coming days will reveal more

1

Surely I am allowed to sell fictional maps? If I can sell a map of Middle-Earth, I can sell a map of a fictional world where a Gulf of Mexico exists.

14
jlai.lu

They all bend the knee. Just wait until the persecution of political opposition becomes a thing.

59
ricdehreply
lemmy.world

Has nothing to do with bending the knee. The executive order literally changed the official name of the Gulf in the U.S. This situation is ridiculous, but it is the new U.S. government that you need to complain about, not the people implementing or deferring to their decisions.

-5

Do. Not. Comply.

Giving in is what gives them the power.

I absolutely will call out people who think it's ok to just go along with the new fascist regime.

42
RxBradreply
infosec.pub

Obama renamed Mt. McKinley to Denali by executive order. Trump is using executive order to rename it back.

Biden outlawed oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico. Trump used executive order to rename it so the Gulf of Mexico "doesn't exist". (EDIT: Actually the naming appears to be unrelated to this. The drilling ban was specifically reversed in a different executive order that reversed several Biden EOs)

It's all questionable use of executive order. But which party is going to step up and say "the last guy did it, but our guy shouldn't be able to ignore checks & balances anymore"?

18
sh.itjust.works

The difference is that it's intentional waters and the International Hydrographic Organization is in charge of standardizing the names.

29
RxBradreply
infosec.pub

The IHO proposes names which world nations may or may not use.

Such is the case with the "Southern Ocean" around Antarctica since the early 2000s, which is randomly recognized & not recognized by world nations.

5

It still requires Congress to pass legislation. I think they would have to leave the organization entirely or amend the resolution to join it and recognize it's naming convention. The executive order is illegal.

4
joel_feilareply
lemmy.world

Actually very little of the gilf falls into international waters

0

gilf

I've heard of MILFs... but i've only seen GILFs in Japan. That's not the geography we're discussing here.

6

A line joining Cape Catoche Light (21°37′N 87°04′W) with the Light on Cape San Antonio in Cuba, through this island to the meridian of 83°W and to the Northward along this meridian to the latitude of the South point of the Dry Tortugas (24°35'N), along this parallel Eastward to Rebecca Shoal (82°35'W) thence through the shoals and Florida Keys to the mainland at the eastern end of Florida Bay and all the narrow waters between the Dry Tortugas and the mainland being considered to be within the Gulf.

3
lemmy.ca

Biden outlawed oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico. Trump used executive order to rename it so the Gulf of Mexico “doesn’t exist”.

I'd be very surprised if all laws/treaties cease to exist if you just rename the "counterparty"/location. Declare Mexico to be named South Texas, and laws no longer apply there?

7

Probably true.

But until a court actually steps up to say it, it's the Wild West out there. And as soon as this gets shot down, another executive order will get wedged back in there to keep the rigs drilling.

EDIT: Apparently the naming had nothing to do with drilling. The drilling ban was already specifically reversed in a different executive order that reversed several Biden EOs

5
ubergeekreply
lemmy.today

International bodies of water tend to be named by... International governing bodies.

That said, Google's choices about which country to rely on has... Some real-world ramifications. Like the very... shall we say, "open to interpretation" border between India and Pakistan. Or, China and India's border.

3
lemmy.ca

This is super dumb.

How are these morons so offended about the name of a body of water?

Their fragile ego is so completely shattered because Mexico "has a Gulf" and they "don't"? Little men with too much power.

107

The loop is broken and spilling loop juice all over at this point

9

Ultimate pettiness, show of power, or misdirection from other, more concerning news.
Could be all at of those or something entirely different, but it sure is pathetic.

21
DannyMacreply
lemm.ee

It's misdirection and makes any laws or regulations specifically mentioning the Gulf of Mexico no longer apply since "tHeRe iSnT a gULf oF mExIcO."

10

You see, I don't think it would invalidate any laws... I suppose it would be subject to whatever judge is making the call, but I would imagine that any judge that's rational and logical would take into effect the concept behind the law, not just it's specific wording as it currently applies.

I hope that anyone looking at a law, written when that specific body of water was named "the Gulf of Mexico" and determine that, since it was called that at the time of the law being passed, that the law applies to the body of water that is, or was, known as "the Gulf of Mexico" at the time it was written, and the law continues to apply to that physical place, regardless of any changes in name.

But that might be a bit too logical, and I might be expecting a lot from the US Justice system.... Or any Justice system for that matter.

1
lemmy.world

Another day another issue that completely doesn't matter at all to distract from the fact that our politicians are incapable of actually fixing any of our problems.

84
Lemminaryreply
lemmy.world

incapable of actually fixing

Or making them worse. He just upped taxes on the lower classes and gave the rich tax breaks... again.

39

politicians are incapable of actually fixing any of our problems.

They're not incapable, they just don't care. They're your problems after all, not theirs.

24
sudo42reply
lemmy.world

Politicians are more than capable of solving our problems. They’re paid not to.

23
lemmy.world

I think you're overestimating humans. Even if we actually attempted to solve all of our problems I seriously doubt we can. I do wonder how much better things could be though.

-1

I do wonder how much better things could be though.

What are you talking about? Oligarchs are living their best lives right now. Trump is in office and there is nothing that is not up for sale. If you have big money right now, the US is your oyster. Bend the knee, kiss the ring and grease the palm. You’ll walk away with your own fiefdom. Pay a bit more and he’ll rent an office in the White House.

11

There's little point in doing so, other than the feel-good moment. Google, and all other mapping companies, ultimately take their data from official sources. This differs per country, so users of maps from outside of the US will continue to see Gulf of Mexico, but complaining that it is wrong will only be ignored because they're following the data from the official US government source.

14
daddy32reply
lemmy.world

They never fix bugs in maps. Some places IRL even got renamed, because it was easier than fixing the name in google maps.

7
lemmy.world

Do you have any examples? It's impossible to find with a search with the recent news.

1
discuss.online

Cowards and sycophants. But this is a problem I, as a Chicagoan, am already familiar with. You see we have this building called the Willis Tower. But everyone here knows that Willis is correctly spelled "Sears."

So you see, the correct spelling of the America in the context of the Gulf is "Mexico."

64

Same problem in toronto.... We have a building called the SkyDome, but everyone misspells it Robbers Center....

19

And what about taking a nice drive down Jean Baptiste Pointe du Sable Lake Shore Drive?

3

Huh, I didn't know the Sears Tower was renamed to Willis. Though the Sears Tower never comes up in conversations for me, I'll surely only ever know it as Sears. So yeah, that's a great point you make

2

Oh so it'll become a shibboleth like how the capital of Ohio is pronounced and spelled "central ohio" if you're at the rare intersection of cool and ohioan

1

I support this.

But we should probably at least have a conversation with Mexico about it, since something like half of their country borders it. IDK, I failed geography.

4
ctkatzreply
lemmy.ml

i think when they rebranded as alphabet, they repealed that corporate philosophy.

11

Sadly though this was never going to be avoided, sure they're leaning hard into conservative cult nonsense, but they were still on a downword optics trajectory. Its impossible not to have this happen in capitalism, it will always be inevitable that enshitifcation happens to milk profit from anywhere it can, and that will always look bad.

6

Wildly, people still think that about working at Apple, for now. I do see that changing slowly too though.

4
ChaoAmberreply
feddit.uk

Open Street Maps needs more contributors!

Been playing the StreetComplete game, which is very much Pokemon Go but helping OSM data.

61
reevreply
sh.itjust.works

OSM unfortunately doesn't seem public transit friendly at all. I did a quick glance over some of the documentation and it mentioned:

Whilst OpenStreetMap is probably not the place for full timetable information, adding information about public transport infrastructure and services to the map means that we can provide basic routing services.

Timetables are a must if you realistically want to use it for public transit. Currently it just tells me to walk to my destination for an hour and a half if I select public transportation. This is the main thing keeping me from using OSM.

14

Well, the ball is in the court of the public transport agencies, then! While OpenStreetMap cannot be expected to accept any and all kind of geographic data imaginable, OSM is meant to serve map data that can supplement other data sources and services.

I'm in Finland, and there's at least a couple of Web services that do long distance bus/rail/plane route planning, all using OSM. Our municipal bus schedule service, mobile app and the bus stop displays have been using OSM for over a decade.

11

Hey great idea, is there an open street maps app?

I found the StreetComplete one here

2
lemmy.world

If this was a different admin, it was an international agreement and the name change was to refer to the continent, I'd be on board. As it stands, this looks like the sort of BS power play the CCP does with the South China Sea.

18

Most of them can't even place their own damn country on a map.

13
lemmy.sdf.org

I'm old fashioned. It's still the Gulf of Mexico and Pluto is still a planet.

47
accideathreply
lemmy.world

I disagree on the Pluto stance because it being classified as a dwarf planet makes sense for various reasons and isn’t about the ego of a racist megalomaniac.

47
Klearreply
lemmy.world

How many planets are there in the solar system in your opinion?

1
sh.itjust.works

it's more so emotionally based because it's personified and I feel bad for poor Pluto 😢, not actually thinking that Pluto should in all scientific circumstances be considered a planet.

It's a lot different to vaccine deniers who don't trust meaningful science and evidence that actually effect the lives of people and can do real harm to the lives of others.

4

Well as a planet pluto was mini mini. As a dwarf planet Pluto is one of the mightiest.

Also, if you call Pluto a planet then it's not fair to Eris and they've done nothing wrong

1

If you want Pluto to be a planet, have the definition of "planet" changed so that Pluto would fall within that definition.

1
lemmy.ml

What the hell. No one’s going to call it the Gulf of America, except for the magas, the rapist and his useless offspring.

This is 4 years of drivel and it’ll always be knows as the Gulf of Mexico.

The man in charge is the biggest moron to ever be given power to lead.

Electing a rapist seems like a very American thing to do, who also married an immigrant, which is very odd since he’s doing his best to stop immigration.

Something something racist rapist hypocrite.

44

Only hot and or under aged immigrants are acceptable. Specially if they have big natural boobs because that means new Americans with big natural boobs. I think penis-wise probably they might consider 8" and longer but must be very girthy. What do I know, I'm not a rapist politician. I could be totally wrong.

6
lemm.ee

One of my favorite lines from early on in trumps rise to cult leader was "Conservatives would let Trump shit in their mouth just to watch liberals become disgusted"

24

Yeah you're right, I couldn't remember the exact wording only the general sentiment, so i went with something close enough lol

6

Why not get right down to it and call it exactly what they want it for?

Gulf of Oil...

37
lemmy.world

Yeah, I've been meaning to switch to OpenStreetMaps for a while now and this was the impetus to drop what I was doing and download it immediately. Fuck Google. So sick of this mask off tech plutocracy bullshit.

Edit: I've tried it a few times yesterday and today, and I like it. Works with Android Auto in my car, guidance voice isn't annoying, directions are accurate. Only complaint is I'm not sure how to search up a business and have the app map me to the nearest location. I need to dig deeper and figure out if I just haven't found it yet.

I would 100% drop GMaps if I could hit the directions button on a Google search and have it bring up OSM instead. Google Maps has been bugged for me for years and the maps app never gets the address from a browser search. I have to search for the business or address in the maps app itself for it to work.

37
Furbagreply
lemmy.world

The discussion seems to be focused around possibly waiting for one or more governing bodies to rule on the name change, or just going along with it and adding an alternate text for people who would prefer the old one, which I think is way more democratic than anything Trump had in mind when signing this XO.

I certainly prefer this over the blind deference that Google seems to have for an executive order that is functionally just direction to the state department and not legally binding in any way whatsoever.

6

Well the openstreetmap community aren't employed by a bunch of hacks perching on a tower of cardboard held together by a failing scheme of duck tape that nobody left after all the layoffs and enshittification knows how to repair, so that makes sense : )

6
lemm.ee

well google always displays the locally official names and borders. so just business as usual.

but why does the president of the usa get to decide what places are called? isn't there a cartography department or something?

36
lemmy.world

Yes. The United States Board on Geographic Names is the group within the Department of the Interior which handles these matters. They are a part of the executive branch. I suspect that you can follow a chain of delegated authorities through that board, up the civil service hierarchy, landing on the desk of the President.

This is an example of the system not accounting for, or being ambivalent about, the election of someone to that office with a fascist ideology.

6
ToxicWastereply
lemm.ee

fair enough. i guess the usa never did a great job ar limiting their presidents power. that way he can extend his reach way further down, than he should...

1

If all he with his remaining term is just randomly rename stuff, I think we will consider ourselves to have gotten off lightly.

1

I'm maining privateemail through namecheap (custom domain) and I've got no notes.

Still got an ancient gmail for legacy stuff, but will definitely be moving stuff off of that now.

I guess there's no way to forward gmail emails after I delete the account?

4
bfg9kreply
lemmy.world

I switched to Proton mail and haven't looked back since

  • Custom domain support
  • Email encryption
  • can auto-import from gmail
1
bfg9kreply
lemmy.world

Oh for fucks sake, I finally find a decent alternative and they do this shit.

8
Karjalanreply
lemmy.world

Given Colbert took the absurdity of conservatism in the US and cranked it up to 11... I'm not surprised it's becoming reality now.

17
lemm.ee

One of my favorite funfacts about the Colbert Report is that many conservatives couldn't tell it was satire.

So much so that Colbert earlier on was regularly invited to things like White House Dinner with Bush and Conservative Conferences. Even when he ended the show he claimed he had a lot of fan mail from Republicans saying they'd miss "Having a sane voice of reason on an otherwise liberal media network."

Some Conservative Subreddits even had to have guidelines explaining he was satire, some claiming he was a straight up "Left Wing Disinformation Agent!"

13

That’s incredible.

I was quite conservative back in 2006, having been raised that way and still years away from my “enlightenment,” but I knew Colbert was satire. I still thought he was hilarious. I’ve always thought it’s important to be able to laugh at yourself.

Bush clearly felt the same, he was laughing right along with the roast, and had just finished doing a bit with a Bush impersonator that also roasted him.

But Trump is incapable of humility, and cannot stand the traditional presidential roast at the Press Correspondents’ Dinner.

6

They can name it how they want. They could name it piss puddle and the rest of the world wouldn't care, it'll still be Gulf of Mexico.

30
Cocodapufreply
lemmy.world

That's an interesting theory, we may just test that out.

But I suspect that ten years from now, it's name will be whatever it's been saying on the maps. Just ask New Yorkers (sorry, I mean new Amsterdamers).

-1

New Amsterdam is different, that was hundreds of years ago before there were millions of printed maps, and it's a different thing to rename own landmarks after a conquest versus something which isn't within your country.

3
mander.xyz

Any chance there's a place we could all start submitting bug reports about the incorrectly named body of water? Once the change goes into effect we should post that everywhere and see if we can swamp Google.

29

They’ll regex those bug reports so fast it won’t even matter.

25
bitwabareply
lemmy.world

Trump would be okay with that because it's still a fuck you to the left coast.

8
lemmy.ca

You mean West coast?

I mean, if I'm facing south, the left coast is the East coast.

4
bitwabareply
lemmy.world

Conservatives like to call the West Coast the left coast. It's their little way of making fun of progressive states.

2

Ah. Thanks. I'm not American so I'm not exposed to that kind of stuff on the regular.

Today I learned. Thank you again.

1
lemmy.world

Where did this gulf of America thing come from anyway. It just seems so left field. Was it a hot topic among the MAGA or something?

It just seems like he woke up one day and had an idea 💡

23
Doomsiderreply
lemmy.world

Someone was saying they want to rename it to work around the laws preventing drilling in the Gulf. It sounds really stupid, but that is on par for this shit show of an administration.

27
0x0reply
programming.dev

So call Greenland Northwestern US and bingo! you can drill? Is that really a thought process in those heads?

6

Why would the name have any bearing on the laws that govern what can, and can't be done there?

This is so freaking dumb I can't even.

2
lemmy.world

They're on this stupid renaming kick. Renaming all the "woke" names back to the "original" white slavers and racists these places originally honored. There are few enough brain cells and energy in government and this is what Trump is making them waste it on. Gulf of THE AmericaS would make sense but obviously the intent is to claim it as the US's.

11

You know what, sure whatever. It burns their political capital and it doesn't actively oppress people

2

Here google. It's correct here. Nothing to change.

E: i love the DV, denying geography lol

22
lemmy.world

I cannot believe they bent on this at all. This isn't the will of the people or a problem we asked to solve it is the asinine rantings of a fucking baby. Why the fuck am I stuck in this timeline holy shit.

21

I'm trying to work out who this is for. Presumably his fan club will approve, but I don't think it was something that even they were particularly asking for.

4

"The Trump administration has passed a resolution saying that Mexico will now be called 'America South' and Canada 'America North'. Google said it will follow the government's lead in changing the names on it's maps app."

19
lemmy.ca

So many important issues affecting America right now ..... and the country and its government is fixated and pouring so much energy, manpower, knowledge, education, experience and capability into .... renaming something on a map that no really gives a shit about.

18

You misunderstand, that’s exactly the point. Giving you something to talk about, while rights are eroded elsewhere.

13
lemm.ee

It's my understanding that the executive does not have the authority to unilaterally change official geographic names. As of my writing this, the name “change” has NOT been adopted by the United States government. Congress granted that authority to the US Board of Geographic Names in 1890. Unless accepted by the US BoGN, it changes nothing. I suppose Congress could rename it if they passed a bill that the president signed into law overriding that authority for that specific case, but until they did so, it’s not official.

Here is the link to the US Geographic Names Information system page showing the current official name of the Gulf of Mexico: https://edits.nationalmap.gov/apps/gaz-domestic/public/search/names/558730. Note the list of accepted variant names, which still doesn’t include “Gulf of America”.

Google are saying here that they will only change it on maps if it's made official by the US Government, which has not happened yet. That's why they haven't made any change yet, and won't unless Trump gets the US BoGN to do his bidding.

Edit: well that didn't take long. They already made made the change.

16

Except they’re waiting on bended knees aren’t they? They’ve show who their daddy is by announcing it.

4
lemmy.world

Google made an issue of this by officially commenting rather than silently conducting business as usual (which would be changing the name when the govt source does).

They're trying to have their cake and eat it, I guess? Theoretically this would appease X viewers and Trump (who would move onto the next trending controversy), while stating that they are following usual procedure?

3

That's my read on it too. Trying to have it both ways, and not exactly succeeding at it.

1

This is a good reminder and sanity check. Things this big are rarely easy to change.

2

Yeah, I'm with you.

This timeline took a serious nosedive somewhere around 2010. I'm no longer sure think we're pulling out of it...

1

I have a tiny penis. But I know a guy who has my real penis. I call his penis my penis. Trust me guys, its big!

16
lemmy.world

Reminds me a lot of after 9/11 when they tried to change French Fries to Freedom fries. That stuck about as well as water on teflon.

15
lemmy.world

For what it's worth, this is how Google maps has always worked. Use Google maps in China and you'll notice that borders are in different places, HK, Tibet Bhutan, the whole China sea, those are within China's borders. It's the same with Russia, crimea is just part of Russia if you use Google maps in Russia. If your country recognizes different borders or different names for places, that's what Google shows you in your country. It's basically either that or they can't operate in that country, so they don't really have a choice if they want to exist in that region.

13
PanArabreply
lemm.ee

HK and Tibet are part of China in all maps. Did you mean Taiwan?

5
Cocodapufreply
lemmy.world

Well yeah, as of 6 years ago, after China invaded with military force, HK has been recognized as part of China on all maps. But Google showed it as part of China even before then.

And then yeah, I just remembered the wrong name, it was the border of Tibet/Bhutan that are in dispute, so parts of Bhutan display as Chinese territory.

Thanks for catching that.

5
Cocodapufreply
lemmy.world

I never said it was exceptional, quite the opposite, I'm saying many countries have border disputes.

Interesting that you don't seem to care about my other examples, Gaza or Crimea. Got a soft spot for China?

2
PanArabreply
lemm.ee

What a weird response. I was addressing your comment. You didn’t mention Palestine -all of it is Palestine FYI, Israel is just another Crusader state- and Crimea should be returned to the Crimean Tatars, both Slavic peoples are invaders.

But no, you would rather play the Sinophobia and Yellow Perilism card and assume that I receive Xi bucks. What a day! I didn’t mention my own country’s border disputes with its neighbors either! Didn’t see it necessary to educate you on the matter.

1

What a weird response. I was addressing your comment. You didn’t mention Palestine.

Oh whoops, it must have been a different post in this thread that I mentioned Gaza.

you would rather play the Sinophobia and Yellow Perilism card and assume that I receive Xi bucks.

I've said nothing of the sort. That sounds like deflection.

3
lemmy.world

It's giving big "freedom fries" energy. Makes sense when you think about how much of a wet dream the post-9/11 circle jerk was (is) for conservatives. They're trying to recreate the same 2002 Republican, plastic-patriot distraction machine again.

13

I don't think it's gonna work as well because people could afford to eat Big Macs everyday back then. No joke, the economic situation is so dire I'm saving up to treat myself and my boyfriend to a fancy dinner date....

The dinner is at fucking Waffle House

6
lemmy.blahaj.zone

So why didn't they change Crimea to be part of Russia, if that's always been the longstanding policy, Google?

(Note; I'm not suggesting it is a part of Russia; just pointing out the hypocrisy of Google since Trump claiming ownership of the Gulf of Mexico is the same thing as Russia claiming ownership of Crimea.)

13

They did (in Russia). There's no hypocrisy here. Just blanket compliance with local authority.

The maps look different when viewed in different regions, this becomes apparent whenever there's contested territory, like crimea, the China sea, Gaza. We only see the maps that our local government approves.

2

Google added that the name Gulf of Mexico will remain displayed for users in Mexico. Users in other countries will see both names, the company said.

Yeah. "Both Names" for other countries is a bit lame but better than just Gulf of America everywhere.

The Denali / McKinley thing is pretty awful though. I hadn't realised Trump had changed that too.

6

Google; we're still calling it Twitter you think we're gonna start calling it Gulf of America just because a doofus says so?

13
xia
lemmy.sdf.org

Wait... so... this was not a joke? They're serious?

10

There is absolutely nothing that is too stupid for republicans.

If the US had an actually functional political system they wouldn't get anywhere near power. They're all crazy and they don't care about anything that actually matters to people. But because there's only two parties they just go "biden bad" and everyone votes for them.

1
narpreply
feddit.org

That doesn't make much sense, since Baja California was named California before the US-State which even belonged to Mexico back in the days.

If anything Trump is going to change California to Ivankia or Putinstan, but I guess at that point California will rather rejoin Mexico.

6

Makes as much sense as changing Gulf of Mexico to Gulf of America - which will go the way of Freedom Fries in 4 years anyway.

5

How do people not understand that Google Maps is regional, and the region sees their official government-endorsed maps?

7

They never wasted any time thinking about that, I fear

2
lemm.ee

Why would google, a company of such unfathomable power and reach, be fearful of Trump? They can say no and it won't affect their bottomline much.

6
Eezyvillereply
sh.itjust.works

Google, or rather Alphabet, is an American company. Trump is the president of America, the most powerful country militarily and economically. Alphabet is also subject to American laws and is currently under an anti-trust lawsuit with America. What makes you think Google can stand up against the US?

6
Echo Dotreply
feddit.uk

They're not required to change it. All the law does is officially change the name for official government purposes it doesn't require everyone in the US to start calling it that.

2

I never said they were required to change it. I just wanted to put into perspective the power that Google has vs the power the US has. Also change the name of the Gulf of Mexico is not law. It did not go through Congress.

1

The only thing they care about is money. If their bottomline doesn't benefit, they don't do.

Unless the CEOs are worried they'll have a Trump supporter shoot them dead and then be immediately pardoned and released by Trump.

1
sh.itjust.works

Does anyone know if Waze will warn you if there is an accident ahead and will redirect you?

6

But to answer your question, absolutely. In fact, Waze's reporting is why Google bought it and added those features to Google Maps.

4
JonEFivereply
midwest.social

Continuing to call it the gulf of mexico will piss him off more

11
lemmy.world

If you are close enough to it for the name to have any relevant reference, you're just guna say Gulf anyway.

4

True. This is how it is with [Arabian|Persian] Gulf.

2
Belgdorereply
lemm.ee

Because the president should have no say in naming geographic locations that have long agreed upon names. And it’s a waste of money to have to replace all the maps and books with updated names.

There’s also no reason for Google to change anything. The US government has no power to make Google use this new name instead of the widely agreed upon name.

It’s a nod to the fact that if Trump says jump google will say “how high?” And no one with any sense likes that bigot.

15
PanArabreply
lemm.ee

And it’s a waste of money to have to replace all the maps and books with updated names.

Who prints the books? They probably made a big contribution to Trump

5

Because it's a corporation bending over to the whims of a government trying to erase the name of a geographic place.

15
lemmy.world

So If I use the flatpak app on Linux would it actually be able to know i'm in the US? I don't use any sort of location services.

1
fedia.io

Geolocation is done by IP address if nothing else is available. It's not exact, but if, for example, you use a US-based internet provider, all their customer IP exit points will already be marked as US-based, and any access from one of those to a Google service will get the new name.

2

yeah, America was a continent long before US was a thing. Which makes the "MAGA" slogan hilarious, as if he's governing for the other countries in America too.

1
lemmy.world

I mean if Turkey can just decide to change it's name and everyone has to respect it (not me Turkey it is), I don't see why this is different

-4
lemmy.world

The Left: its called an Allow List now, you racists! The Right: its called the Gulf of America, you commies!

Jesus, we're pathetic.

-4

One is propaganda made up by right wing nerds and one is the president of fucking america if you didnt catch how silly you were being right now

2
Echo Dotreply
feddit.uk

Nobody calls it that though. No one who is actually left-wing thought that calling them blacklist / white list was offensive.

1

Is this another of those things where someone wrote some mild Substack post about “maybe the phrase black list does imply black = bad” that maybe five people read before conservatives decided that it represents the ideological position of all leftists?

3