Comment on
We would've been fooled
Reply in thread
It's because the camera angle is different and her mouth is open in the right which causes it to look different. She has the same chin
Comment on
We would've been fooled
Reply in thread
It's because the camera angle is different and her mouth is open in the right which causes it to look different. She has the same chin
Comment on
Time zones can be silly
Reply in thread
At 00:00 (midnight) UTC on monday, Russia's time would be 12:00 (noon) of monday and alaska's would be 15:00 (3 pm) of sunday.
Comment on
Photographer killed after accidentally walking into plane propeller in Kansas
Not very oniony. Condolences to her family
Comment on
*Permanently Deleted*
It eggs even states
Comment on
The most well-funded campaign in US history
Reply in thread
Based on OP's post history, it's meant to be against Batman (and Biden) here. Post has the opposite effect though lol
Comment on
Breaking news! My cat is officially off her diet!
My cat looks similar to yours :D
Comment on
For my own safety
Reply in thread
What does the comic have to do with trans folk?
Comment on
"Normaize This Reaction" (Art by Cellspex)
Reply in thread
Probably referring to "you're the only one thinking that." There's at least two of us :p
But yeah, probably not most
Comment on
Took me by surprise
Reply in thread
IMHO "males" is also dehumanising, but I digress. When used in the derogatory sense "females" is often beside "men," implying that women are inferior to men. It's become somewhat of a "dog-whistle," which is a form of coded language that the speaker uses to imply a different message to a specific audience (usually some sort of bigotry) while maintaining plausable deniability. Someone may purposely use "females" to refer to women to indicate their own misogyny to people who share their beliefs, and it is intentially ambiguous to prevent women who pick up on it from calling it out. Tmk "males" isn't commonly loaded in the same way
Comment on
Took me by surprise
Reply in thread
Subtle changes in diction can sometimes dramatically impact how your message is interpreted. Language evolves, and words can take on additional (perfecly valid) meaning over time that are only added to a dictionary after being well-established. This can cause misunderstandings, as demonstrated in this thread. I'm sure you have no negative intentions, but to many it does not seem that way. The takeaway is that a small change in phrasing or words can decide how effectively your meaning is communicated, even if you are unaware of it. Language is messy, and consists of mutual understandings of what a given "word" means. In this case, the hidden negative connotation in "females" is causing you to be misunderstood. I believe using "woman" instead would reflect what you meant without causing anybody to be uncomfortable. Best regards
Comment on
More Jpeg Rule
Reply in thread
Comment on
*Permanently Deleted*
Reply in thread
Real men don't shower 💪💪
Comment on
Tesla Reportedly Has $800 Million Worth of Cybertrucks That Nobody Wants
"worth"
Comment on
Anyone?
Reply in thread
Malenia is a Elden Ring character. You're thinking of megakaryocytopoiesis
Comment on
Y tho
Reply in thread
Cosine starts at 1 and decreasing, sine starts at 0 and increasing
Comment on
The park in my parent's neighborhood got rid of all the benches
Reply in thread
Comment on
Regularly
Reply in thread
Likely AI. What sticks out to me is the text thats too messy to be font and too clean to be handwriting. It does not come up in a Tineye search, which would be common if it was reposted from somewhere else, and if OP made it they could say so. Lack of credit is always suspicious
Comment on
CHESS BAN
Reply in thread
TIL
Comment on
phon
Reply in thread
destroy the phone with eye lasers so you can sit in peace
Comment on
My Void
Reply in thread